This study aimed to evaluate how the addition of resveratrol nanoparticles (RNPs), which act as an antimicrobial agent, affects the strength of acrylic resin used in orthodontics.
Methods
According to ISO 20795-1-2013, 76 cold cure acrylic resin samples (65 × 10 × 3.3 mm) were prepared. The samples were divided into four groups (19 samples in each group) based on RN concentrations added to 1 mL acrylic monomer (0 for control, 256, 512, and 1024 μg/mL). Flexural strength was assessed in megapascal (MPa) using a universal testing machine. Data analysis involved nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and pairwise post-hoc Dunn's test.
Results
The flexural strength decreased as the concentration of RNPs increased, with the lowest value observed at 1024 μg/mL (63.06 ± 5.33 MPa). The control group exhibited the highest mean of flexural strength (88.43 ± 4.41 MPa), followed by the groups with RNPs at the concentrations of 256 μg/mL (82.69 ± 4.41 MPa) and 512 μg/mL (76.02 ± 4.59 MPa).
Conclusion
In conclusion, the addition of RNs to orthodontic acrylic resin had a dose-dependent impact on its flexural strength. Based on the findings, we recommend incorporating RNs at a concentration of 256 μg/mL as an antimicrobial agent in orthodontic acrylic resin. However, further research is necessary to assess the long-term effects and clinical applications of this approach.
{"title":"The flexural strength of orthodontic acrylic resin containing resveratrol nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: An in vitro study","authors":"Rashin Bahrami , Fateme Gharibpour , Maryam Pourhajibagher , Abbas Bahador","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100846","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2024.100846","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate how the addition of resveratrol nanoparticles (RNPs), which act as an antimicrobial agent, affects the strength of acrylic resin used in orthodontics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>According to ISO 20795-1-2013, 76 cold cure acrylic resin samples (65<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->10<!--> <!-->×<!--> <!-->3.3<!--> <!-->mm) were prepared. The samples were divided into four groups (19 samples in each group) based on RN concentrations added to 1<!--> <!-->mL acrylic monomer (0 for control, 256, 512, and 1024<!--> <!-->μg/mL). Flexural strength was assessed in megapascal (MPa) using a universal testing machine. Data analysis involved nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and pairwise post-hoc Dunn's test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The flexural strength decreased as the concentration of RNPs increased, with the lowest value observed at 1024<!--> <!-->μg/mL (63.06<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->5.33<!--> <!-->MPa). The control group exhibited the highest mean of flexural strength (88.43<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.41<!--> <!-->MPa), followed by the groups with RNPs at the concentrations of 256<!--> <!-->μg/mL (82.69<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.41<!--> <!-->MPa) and 512<!--> <!-->μg/mL (76.02<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.59<!--> <!-->MPa).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In conclusion, the addition of RNs to orthodontic acrylic resin had a dose-dependent impact on its flexural strength. Based on the findings, we recommend incorporating RNs at a concentration of 256<!--> <!-->μg/mL as an antimicrobial agent in orthodontic acrylic resin. However, further research is necessary to assess the long-term effects and clinical applications of this approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 2","pages":"Article 100846"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139714848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-29DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100838
Diego Coelho Lorenzoni , Olívia Thomaz de Almeida Monteiro Barbosa, Adriana de Alcantara Cury-Saramago, Cláudia Trindade Mattos
Non-surgical treatment of Class II subdivision may involve complex mechanics or asymmetric tooth extraction in its resolution. This report demonstrates the result and the short-term stability of Class II subdivision treated with asymmetrically installed Herbst appliance followed by conventional fixed orthodontic appliance. The approach allowed the correction of the unilateral Class II molar relationship and increased overjet, as well as the deviation of dental midlines, with improvement in lip posture and facial profile. The results remained stable two years after treatment, confirming the treatment success.
非手术治疗 II 类牙列不齐可能涉及复杂的力学或不对称拔牙。本报告展示了使用不对称安装的赫氏矫治器和传统固定矫治器治疗 II 类牙列不齐的效果和短期稳定性。这种方法可以矫正单侧 II 类臼齿关系和增加的过咬合,以及牙齿中线的偏差,改善唇姿和面部轮廓。治疗两年后,效果保持稳定,证实了治疗的成功。
{"title":"Class II subdivision treatment and stability with asymmetric Herbst appliance: A case report","authors":"Diego Coelho Lorenzoni , Olívia Thomaz de Almeida Monteiro Barbosa, Adriana de Alcantara Cury-Saramago, Cláudia Trindade Mattos","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100838","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100838","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Non-surgical treatment of Class II subdivision may involve complex mechanics or asymmetric tooth extraction in its resolution. This report demonstrates the result and the short-term stability of Class II subdivision treated with asymmetrically installed </span>Herbst appliance followed by conventional fixed </span>orthodontic appliance. The approach allowed the correction of the unilateral Class II molar relationship and increased </span>overjet, as well as the deviation of dental midlines, with improvement in lip posture and facial profile. The results remained stable two years after treatment, confirming the treatment success.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 2","pages":"Article 100838"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139643059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-19DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100843
Julian Woolley , Natasha Wright , Maurice J. Meade
Introduction
Detailed insight regarding the use of temporary anchorage devices (TAD) in Australia and the United Kingdom (UK) is lacking. The primary aim of the present cross-sectional survey was to investigate TAD usage among UK-based and Australian-based orthodontists. The secondary objectives were to compare TAD-related preferences and protocols between orthodontists in the two countries.
Methods
A pilot-tested electronic questionnaire was distributed to members of the British Orthodontic Society and the Australian Society of Orthodontists. Questions pertained to their demographic details, and current use of TADs including protocols, treatment objectives and factors influencing their use.
Results
A total of 192 responses were recorded (Australia: 122; UK: 70). One hundred and forty-two respondents (74.0%) reported using TADs as part of their orthodontic treatment, 77.0% in Australia (n = 94) and 68.6% in the UK (n = 48). Molar protraction was the most common procedure for which TADs were reportedly used (Australia: n = 118; 87.2%, UK: n = 36; 75.0%). “Loosening” was the most prevalent reported complication overall (n = 124; 90.1%). “Confidence”, “insufficient postgraduate education” and “availability of equipment” were the factors that most influenced the decision not to provide TADs.
Conclusions
Most orthodontists in both countries provided TADs. TAD protocols of orthodontists in both countries were reported. Similarities and differences regarding TAD-related clinical practices and procedures, complications and factors influencing the use of TADs and reasons for not using TADs were explored. Information from the present study can provide baseline data for future related studies in each country and for comparison of TAD usage in other countries.
导言:关于澳大利亚和英国临时固定装置(TAD)的使用情况还缺乏详细的了解。本次横断面调查的主要目的是调查英国和澳大利亚正畸医师的 TAD 使用情况。方法:向英国正畸学会和澳大利亚正畸学会的会员发放了一份经过试验测试的电子问卷。问题涉及他们的人口统计学细节、目前对 TAD 的使用情况,包括治疗方案、治疗目标和影响其使用的因素。结果 共收到 192 份回复(澳大利亚:122 份;英国:70 份)。142名受访者(74.0%)称使用TADs作为正畸治疗的一部分,其中澳大利亚为77.0%(n=94),英国为68.6%(n=48)。据报告,臼齿牵引是使用 TADs 的最常见程序(澳大利亚:n = 118;87.2%;英国:n = 36;75.0%)。"松动 "是最常见的并发症(124 人;90.1%)。"信心"、"研究生教育不足 "和 "设备可用性 "是影响不提供 TAD 的最大因素。两国正畸医生的 TAD 协议均有报道。研究探讨了与 TAD 相关的临床实践和程序、并发症、影响使用 TAD 的因素以及不使用 TAD 的原因等方面的异同。本研究提供的信息可为两国今后的相关研究提供基线数据,也可用于比较其他国家的 TAD 使用情况。
{"title":"Usage of temporary anchorage devices: A cross-cultural and cross-sectional survey of orthodontists in Australia and the UK","authors":"Julian Woolley , Natasha Wright , Maurice J. Meade","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100843","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100843","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Detailed insight regarding the use of temporary anchorage devices (TAD) in Australia and the United Kingdom (UK) is lacking. The primary aim of the present cross-sectional survey was to investigate TAD usage among UK-based and Australian-based orthodontists. The secondary objectives were to compare TAD-related preferences and protocols between orthodontists in the two countries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A pilot-tested electronic questionnaire was distributed to members of the British Orthodontic<span> Society and the Australian Society of Orthodontists. Questions pertained to their demographic details, and current use of TADs including protocols, treatment objectives and factors influencing their use.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>A total of 192 responses were recorded (Australia: 122; UK: 70). One hundred and forty-two respondents (74.0%) reported using TADs as part of their orthodontic treatment, 77.0% in Australia (</span><em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->94) and 68.6% in the UK (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->48). Molar protraction was the most common procedure for which TADs were reportedly used (Australia: <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->118; 87.2%, UK: <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->36; 75.0%). “Loosening” was the most prevalent reported complication overall (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->124; 90.1%). “Confidence”, “insufficient postgraduate education” and “availability of equipment” were the factors that most influenced the decision not to provide TADs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Most orthodontists in both countries provided TADs. TAD protocols of orthodontists in both countries were reported. Similarities and differences regarding TAD-related clinical practices and procedures, complications and factors influencing the use of TADs and reasons for not using TADs were explored. Information from the present study can provide baseline data for future related studies in each country and for comparison of TAD usage in other countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 2","pages":"Article 100843"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139503923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-18DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100839
Julien Bord
Date of birth
24/09/1998; sex: female.
Pre-treatment documents
13 years 5 months old; 07/03/2012.
Diagnosis
Skeletal Class I with biretrusion, hypodivergent facial pattern; angle's Class II division 1 with overbite; moderate dento-maxillary discrepancy; maxillary incisor malposition.
Treatment planning
Bimaxillary buccal fixed appliance with Class II elastics. Active treatment duration: 25 months.
{"title":"Thirteen-year-old female patient with Class II division 1 malocclusion and hypodivergent facial pattern treated with buccal fixed appliance. Case report no 230052. European College of Orthodontics. Commission of affiliation and titularisation","authors":"Julien Bord","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100839","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100839","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Date of birth</h3><p>24/09/1998; sex: female.</p></div><div><h3>Pre-treatment documents</h3><p>13 years 5 months old; 07/03/2012.</p></div><div><h3>Diagnosis</h3><p>Skeletal Class I with biretrusion, hypodivergent facial pattern; angle's Class II division 1 with overbite<span>; moderate dento-maxillary discrepancy; maxillary incisor malposition.</span></p></div><div><h3>Treatment planning</h3><p>Bimaxillary buccal fixed appliance with Class II elastics. Active treatment duration: 25 months.</p></div><div><h3>Post-treatment documents</h3><p>15 years 7 months old; 09/05/2014.</p></div><div><h3>Post-retention documents</h3><p>(minimum 1 year) 16 years 9 months old; 08/07/2015. Retention period: unlimited.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 2","pages":"Article 100839"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139493247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-12DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100842
Monika A. Hersberger-Zurfluh , Melih Motro , Alpdogan Kantarci , Leslie A. Will , Theodore Eliades , Spyridon N. Papageorgiou
Introduction
This study aimed to discover the genetic and environmental factors that contribute to the mandibular development of untreated monozygotic and dizygotic twins.
Material and methods
The sample, taken from the Forsyth Moorrees Twin Study, included 52 untreated monozygotic twins (36 male, 16 female) and 46 untreated dizygotic twins (23 male, 23 female). At the ages of 12 and 17, lateral cephalograms were collected and traced to assess total mandibular length, mandibular ramus length, mandibular corpus length, gonial angle, SNB, and bony chin prominence. The genetic and environmental components of variation were assessed using multilevel mixed-effects structural equation modelling.
Results
At 12 years of age, high additive genetic influences were observed for total mandibular length (74%), gonial angle (76%), SNB (41%), and bony chin prominence (64%), whereas strong dominant genetic components were observed for corpus length (72%), and mandibular ramus length was under unique environment influence (54%). At 17 years of age, only total mandibular length (45%), ramus length (53%), gonial angle (76%), and bony chin prominence (68%) were under strong additive genetic control, while the remainder were under strong dominant genetic control.
Conclusions
Although monozygotic and dizygotic twins share at least a portion of their DNA, additive, dominant, or environmental components were discovered during adolescence. Nonetheless, by the age of 17, the majority of the mandibular traits are under either additive or dominant genetic impact.
{"title":"Genetic and environmental impact on mandibular growth in mono- and dizygotic twins during adolescence: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Monika A. Hersberger-Zurfluh , Melih Motro , Alpdogan Kantarci , Leslie A. Will , Theodore Eliades , Spyridon N. Papageorgiou","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100842","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100842","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study aimed to discover the genetic and environmental factors that contribute to the mandibular development of untreated monozygotic and dizygotic twins.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>The sample, taken from the Forsyth Moorrees Twin Study, included 52 untreated monozygotic twins (36 male, 16 female) and 46 untreated dizygotic twins (23 male, 23 female). At the ages of 12 and 17, lateral cephalograms were collected and traced to assess total mandibular length, mandibular ramus length, mandibular corpus length, gonial angle, SNB, and bony chin prominence. The genetic and environmental components of variation were assessed using multilevel mixed-effects structural equation modelling.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At 12 years of age, high additive genetic influences were observed for total mandibular length (74%), gonial angle (76%), SNB (41%), and bony chin prominence (64%), whereas strong dominant genetic components were observed for corpus length (72%), and mandibular ramus length was under unique environment influence (54%). At 17 years of age, only total mandibular length (45%), ramus length (53%), gonial angle (76%), and bony chin prominence (68%) were under strong additive genetic control, while the remainder were under strong dominant genetic control.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Although monozygotic and dizygotic twins share at least a portion of their DNA, additive, dominant, or environmental components were discovered during adolescence. Nonetheless, by the age of 17, the majority of the mandibular traits are under either additive or dominant genetic impact.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 1","pages":"Article 100842"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1761722723001213/pdfft?md5=c23735eda8eb80f927d6a8539436f6f6&pid=1-s2.0-S1761722723001213-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139433991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-12DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100841
François Camelin , Aline Saade , Marwan El Helou
Objective
The main objective of this review was to evaluate the effects of orthodontic intrusion on patients with reduced periodontium. Additionally, this review aims to explore the potential for attachment gain and tissue regeneration in these patients and identify optimal therapeutic conditions to mitigate any negative effects of intrusion.
Methods
A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. Duplicate electronic searches of the PubMed, Cochrane, EMC Premium, and Science Direct databases were performed by two independent reviewers. Data extraction and quality assessments, including risk of bias evaluation using the Cochrane and ROBINS-I tools were conducted.
Results
From an initial pool of 418 articles, 29 were selected after title and abstract screening for full-text review. Following thorough full-text reading, 15 studies were ultimately included in the analysis. The total number of patients included in the studies is 528, who underwent orthodontic intrusion on reduced periodontium. Studies indicated a decrease in periodontal pocket depth and an increase in clinical attachment with ortho-periodontal treatment. Alveolar bone level outcomes varied, showing both increases and losses. Authors generally observed improved papillary regeneration and reduced gingival recessions.
Conclusion
Clinical studies involving combined ortho-periodontal treatment showed that orthodontic intrusion on a reduced but healthy periodontium can be considered a beneficial treatment for the periodontium, provided that potential adverse effects are carefully monitored.
{"title":"To intrude or not to intrude? A systematic review of the controversy surrounding orthodontic intrusion on reduced periodontium","authors":"François Camelin , Aline Saade , Marwan El Helou","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100841","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100841","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The main objective of this review was to evaluate the effects of orthodontic<span> intrusion on patients with reduced periodontium. Additionally, this review aims to explore the potential for attachment gain and tissue regeneration in these patients and identify optimal therapeutic conditions to mitigate any negative effects of intrusion.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. Duplicate electronic searches of the PubMed, Cochrane, EMC Premium, and Science Direct databases were performed by two independent reviewers. Data extraction and quality assessments, including risk of bias evaluation using the Cochrane and ROBINS-I tools were conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From an initial pool of 418 articles, 29 were selected after title and abstract screening for full-text review. Following thorough full-text reading, 15 studies were ultimately included in the analysis. The total number of patients included in the studies is 528, who underwent orthodontic intrusion on reduced periodontium. Studies indicated a decrease in periodontal pocket<span><span> depth and an increase in clinical attachment with ortho-periodontal treatment. </span>Alveolar bone<span> level outcomes varied, showing both increases and losses. Authors generally observed improved papillary regeneration and reduced gingival recessions.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Clinical studies involving combined ortho-periodontal treatment showed that orthodontic intrusion on a reduced but healthy periodontium can be considered a beneficial treatment for the periodontium, provided that potential adverse effects are carefully monitored.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 1","pages":"Article 100841"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139433097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-12DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100840
Ioannis A. Tsolakis , Aliki Rontogianni , Apostolos I. Tsolakis , Moschos A. Papadopoulos
Objective
The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for dental model scanning to the accuracy of model scanners.
Methods
Subjects from private practice were collected and scanned according to specific selection criteria. A total of 10 STL files were produced and used as reference files. They were printed with a three-dimensional (3D) printer and then scanned with CBCT and model scanner. For trueness evaluation, all models were scanned once with both equipments. Each file derived from each scan was compared with the corresponding reference model file. For the precision measurements, the physical model from the first master reference model file was scanned 10 times with each equipment and compared with the reference STL file. A reverse engineering software was used for all 3D best-fit comparisons.
Results
With regard to the measurement of trueness of each method, the calculated mean root mean square (RMS) value was 0.06 ± 0.01 mm for the CBCT, and 0.15 ± 0.02 mm for the model scanner. There was a significant difference between the two methods (P < 0.01). For the evaluation of precision of each scanner, the mean RMS value was 0.0056 ± 0.001 mm for the CBCT, and 0.153 ± 0.002 mm for model scanner. There was a significant difference between the two methods (P < 0.01).
Conclusions
Cone Beam Computed Tomography seems to be an accurate method for scanning dental models. CBCT performs better than model scanners to scan dental models in terms of trueness and precision.
{"title":"Comparing CBCT to model scanner for dental model scanning. An in vitro imaging accuracy study","authors":"Ioannis A. Tsolakis , Aliki Rontogianni , Apostolos I. Tsolakis , Moschos A. Papadopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100840","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100840","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for </span>dental model scanning to the accuracy of model scanners.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Subjects from private practice were collected and scanned according to specific selection criteria. A total of 10 STL files were produced and used as reference files. They were printed with a three-dimensional (3D) printer and then scanned with CBCT and model scanner. For trueness evaluation, all models were scanned once with both equipments. Each file derived from each scan was compared with the corresponding reference model file. For the precision measurements, the physical model from the first master reference model file was scanned 10 times with each equipment and compared with the reference STL file. A reverse engineering software was used for all 3D best-fit comparisons.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>With regard to the measurement of trueness of each method, the calculated mean root mean square (RMS) value was 0.06<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.01<!--> <!-->mm for the CBCT, and 0.15<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.02<!--> <!-->mm for the model scanner. There was a significant difference between the two methods (<em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01). For the evaluation of precision of each scanner, the mean RMS value was 0.0056<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.001<!--> <!-->mm for the CBCT, and 0.153<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.002<!--> <!-->mm for model scanner. There was a significant difference between the two methods (<em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Cone Beam Computed Tomography seems to be an accurate method for scanning dental models. CBCT performs better than model scanners to scan dental models in terms of trueness and precision.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 1","pages":"Article 100840"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139433093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-30DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100837
Xian Wang, Jie Gao
This case report describes a 19-year-old man presented with a 5.7-mm deep overbite, Class II division 2 malocclusion with the right upper maxillary canine completely buccal ectopia, deviated midline in the upper arch, severe crowding and retroclination of the maxillary and mandibular incisors. The patient was treated with clear aligners to correct the Class II relationship and the deep overbite. A series of clear aligners were used to move bilateral maxillary molars distally with unilateral mini-screw anchorage. The final results showed that clear aligners with mini-screws could effectively achieve the required upper distal molar movement thanks to a reasonable design of the stages and anchorage. The treatment was completed in 19 months and the patient was satisfied with the treatment outcome in this context of mild to moderate Class II division 2 malocclusion.
本病例报告描述的是一名19岁的男子,他有5.7毫米的深覆牙合,Ⅱ类第2分区错颌畸形,右上颌犬齿完全颊外翻,上牙弓中线偏斜,上颌和下颌切牙严重拥挤和后倾。患者接受了透明矫正器治疗,以矫正二类关系和深咬合。使用一系列透明矫正器将双侧上颌磨牙向远端移动,并用单侧微型螺丝固定。最终结果显示,由于阶段和固位设计合理,带有微型螺丝的透明矫正器可以有效地实现所需的上远磨牙移动。治疗在 19 个月内完成,患者对这种轻中度 II 类 2 分裂错颌畸形的治疗效果表示满意。
{"title":"Clear aligner treatment assisted by mini screw for an adult with Class II division 2 malocclusion and a right upper canine completely outside of the dental arch: A case report","authors":"Xian Wang, Jie Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100837","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100837","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This case report describes a 19-year-old man presented with a 5.7-mm deep overbite, Class II division 2 malocclusion with the right upper maxillary canine completely buccal ectopia, deviated midline in the upper arch, severe crowding and retroclination of the maxillary and mandibular incisors. The patient was treated with clear aligners to correct the Class II relationship and the deep overbite. A series of clear aligners were used to move bilateral maxillary molars distally with unilateral mini-screw anchorage. The final results showed that clear aligners with mini-screws could effectively achieve the required upper distal molar movement thanks to a reasonable design of the stages and anchorage. The treatment was completed in 19 months and the patient was satisfied with the treatment outcome in this context of mild to moderate Class II division 2 malocclusion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 1","pages":"Article 100837"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S176172272300116X/pdfft?md5=cba12e23e4da9c55e01867650ce857c1&pid=1-s2.0-S176172272300116X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139075420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-22DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100835
Neylla Berg Gomes , João Victor Francetto Paes de Almeida , José Guilherme Neves , Américo Bortolazzo Correr , Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho , Ana Rosa Costa
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the influence of different manufacturing procedures (Eli annealed – hot work versus cold worked – cold work) of the raw material under mechanical properties and morphological characteristics of orthodontic miniscrews (MS).
Material and methods
Thirty MS were randomly separated into 3 types (n = 10) according to manufacturer and manufacturing process of the raw material: type A – SIN® annealed (control group); type B – Dentfix® annealed; and, type C – Dentfix® cold worked. MI were inserted in artificial bone blocks, through the manufacturer's specific manual key attached to the digital torquemeter stabilized via custom device. Data of fracture's occurrence was performed using Fisher's exact test. Comparisons between the other two types regarding insertion torque and removal torque were performed using the Mann-Whitney test. Data of fracture torque, shear stress, normal stress and torque ratio was submitted to Kruskal Wallis and Dunn tests (α = 0.05). Representative images of surface morphology and fractures were selected.
Results
Type C showed statistically the lowest fracture torque (N.cm) (26.11 ± 0.41) (P = 0.0012) and highest torque ratio (%) (98.74 ± 0.85) (P = 0.0007). Type C showed statistically higher calculated shear (MPa) (2,432.73 ± 508.41) and normal stress (MPa) (1,403.86 ± 293.39) than type B and type A, showing that they differed in relation to the mechanical strength of the material with which they were made (P = 0.0007).
Conclusion
Type A fractured completely inside the most apical bone. Type B and type C fractured closer to the transmucosal profile. Cold worked process should be more prone to fractures than those annealed raw manufactured.
目的:本研究旨在评估原材料的不同制造程序(伊莱退火-热加工与冷加工-冷加工)对正畸微型螺丝(MS)机械性能和形态特征的影响:根据原材料的制造商和生产工艺,将 30 个微型螺钉随机分为 3 种类型(n=10):A 型--SIN® 退火型(对照组);B 型--Dentfix® 退火型;C 型--Dentfix® 冷加工型。通过生产商指定的手动钥匙将 MI 插入人工骨块,并通过定制装置将其连接到数字扭矩计上。骨折发生率数据采用费雪精确检验。其他两种类型在插入扭矩和移除扭矩方面的比较采用 Mann-Whitney 检验法。骨折扭矩、剪切应力、法向应力和扭矩比的数据采用 Kruskal Wallis 和 Dunn 检验(α=0.05)。选取了具有代表性的表面形态和断口图像:据统计,C 型的断裂扭矩(N.cm)最低(26.11±0.41)(P=0.0012),扭矩比(%)最高(98.74±0.85)(P=0.0007)。据统计,C 型的计算剪应力(MPa)(2,432.73±508.41)和法应力(MPa)(1,403.86±293.39)均高于 B 型和 A 型,这表明它们在制造材料的机械强度方面存在差异(P=0.0007):结论:A型完全在最顶端的骨头内断裂。结论:A 型完全在最顶端的骨内断裂,B 型和 C 型的断裂位置更靠近粘膜横断面。冷加工工艺比退火生料更容易发生断裂。
{"title":"Evaluation of mechanical properties and morphology of miniscrews Ti6Al4V cold worked versus annealed in artificial bones","authors":"Neylla Berg Gomes , João Victor Francetto Paes de Almeida , José Guilherme Neves , Américo Bortolazzo Correr , Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho , Ana Rosa Costa","doi":"10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100835","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100835","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p><span>This study aimed to evaluate the influence of different manufacturing procedures (Eli annealed – hot work versus cold worked – cold work) of the raw material under mechanical properties and morphological characteristics of </span>orthodontic miniscrews (MS).</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Thirty MS were randomly separated into 3 types (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <span>10) according to manufacturer and manufacturing process of the raw material: type A – SIN® annealed (control group); type B – Dentfix® annealed; and, type C – Dentfix® cold worked. MI were inserted in artificial bone blocks, through the manufacturer's specific manual key attached to the digital torquemeter stabilized via custom device. Data of fracture's occurrence was performed using Fisher's exact test. Comparisons between the other two types regarding insertion torque and removal torque were performed using the Mann-Whitney test. Data of fracture torque, shear stress, normal stress and torque ratio was submitted to Kruskal Wallis and Dunn tests (</span><em>α</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.05). Representative images of surface morphology and fractures were selected.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Type C showed statistically the lowest fracture torque (N.cm) (26.11<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.41) (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0012) and highest torque ratio (%) (98.74<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.85) (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0007). Type C showed statistically higher calculated shear (MPa) (2,432.73<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->508.41) and normal stress (MPa) (1,403.86<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->293.39) than type B and type A, showing that they differed in relation to the mechanical strength of the material with which they were made (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0007).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Type A fractured completely inside the most apical bone. Type B and type C fractured closer to the transmucosal profile. Cold worked process should be more prone to fractures than those annealed raw manufactured.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45449,"journal":{"name":"International Orthodontics","volume":"22 1","pages":"Article 100835"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139032705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}