Pub Date : 1998-01-01DOI: 10.2753/CES1097-1475310160
Li Yanling
With regard to the question of the natures of the privately run economy and of the proprietors of privately run enterprises in our country at this time, there are a variety of different understandings and opinions among theoreticians on the subject. In the following [article] we will provide an overview of some of the major points of view.
{"title":"An Overview of the Discussion on the Question of the Natures of the Privately Run Economy and the Proprietors of Privately Run Enterprises","authors":"Li Yanling","doi":"10.2753/CES1097-1475310160","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CES1097-1475310160","url":null,"abstract":"With regard to the question of the natures of the privately run economy and of the proprietors of privately run enterprises in our country at this time, there are a variety of different understandings and opinions among theoreticians on the subject. In the following [article] we will provide an overview of some of the major points of view.","PeriodicalId":45785,"journal":{"name":"CHINESE ECONOMY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/CES1097-1475310160","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69417117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1998-01-01DOI: 10.2753/CES1097-1475310155
Pan Zhengqiu
Given that our country is in the primary stage of socialism, and that we do not have a high degree of socialization in our society's productionâand, furthermore, that our production has the character of being multileveledâit is entirely necessary that [at this stage] we permit, and, indeed, encourage, the appropriate development of the privately owned economy. It is very much the correct thing to do. However, at the same time, we must firmly uphold the premise that, in terms of [the ownership of] the means of production >i>[shengchan ziliao]>/i>, the public-ownership system must remain as the dominant core.
{"title":"Two Problems to Which We Must Pay Attention as We Develop the Privately Owned Economy","authors":"Pan Zhengqiu","doi":"10.2753/CES1097-1475310155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CES1097-1475310155","url":null,"abstract":"Given that our country is in the primary stage of socialism, and that we do not have a high degree of socialization in our society's productionâand, furthermore, that our production has the character of being multileveledâit is entirely necessary that [at this stage] we permit, and, indeed, encourage, the appropriate development of the privately owned economy. It is very much the correct thing to do. However, at the same time, we must firmly uphold the premise that, in terms of [the ownership of] the means of production >i>[shengchan ziliao]>/i>, the public-ownership system must remain as the dominant core.","PeriodicalId":45785,"journal":{"name":"CHINESE ECONOMY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"1998-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/CES1097-1475310155","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69417107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1997-11-01DOI: 10.2753/CES1097-1475300633
Liu Renliang
Although the proportion that the state-owned economic sector makes up in the national economy has been declining from year to year since the beginning of reform and opening up, it nonetheless remains in a dominant position today. Up to 1995, the largest contribution to the state's annual fiscal revenues has come from the state-owned economic sector, representing 65.8 percent and giving it the dominant position. The state-owned economy holds a position of absolute predominance in certain industrial sectors that are critical to the nation's economy as a whole and to the livelihood of the entire population. For example, the energy-resource industries, the postal-service industry, and the telecommunications industries are almost 100 percent in the hands of the state-owned economy; within the transportation industrial sector, the railroads and the long-distance maritime transportation industry are basically controlled by the state-owned economy; of the total amount of goods transported and handled by the transportation industrial sector as a whole, more than 97 percent is handled by state-owned economies. Although the nonâstate-owned economy has already come to manage a considerable portion of the value-added communications industry and the non-basic communications industry, state-owned economies remain the primary force in the basic communications service industrial sector. In recent years, banks operating under a shareholding system, credit cooperatives and credit unions, and nonâstate-owned insurance companies have experienced relatively rapid growth, and have come to occupy a considerable share of the market in these financial industries; and yet, in the financial industrial sector as a whole, the state-owned banks continue to control over 90 percent of the deposit and loan business in banking, and the People's Insurance Corporation [a state-owned economic entity] controls more than 90 percent of all insurance business in the nation. Furthermore, in the stocks and securities industry, the state-owned securities corporations remain dominant. In the manufacturing industrial sector, the state-owned economy continues to make up a very large proportion of all the major industries and trades. In 1995, 78.1 percent of the overall output value of mining industries, 67.5 percent of the output of raw industrial material, and 78.5 percent of the output in the electrical-power, gas, and water-supply industries were all under the state-owned economy. In the processing industries sector, the share of the state-owned economy is relatively less, but even here, if we were to define enterprises in which state ownership controls more than 50 percent of the stocks/shares as part of the state-owned economy, there would be a substantial increase in the state-owned economic sector's share of the output in the processing industries as well.
{"title":"An Analysis and Forecast of the Growth of Economies Under Various Types of Ownership Systems in the Year 1997","authors":"Liu Renliang","doi":"10.2753/CES1097-1475300633","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CES1097-1475300633","url":null,"abstract":"Although the proportion that the state-owned economic sector makes up in the national economy has been declining from year to year since the beginning of reform and opening up, it nonetheless remains in a dominant position today. Up to 1995, the largest contribution to the state's annual fiscal revenues has come from the state-owned economic sector, representing 65.8 percent and giving it the dominant position. The state-owned economy holds a position of absolute predominance in certain industrial sectors that are critical to the nation's economy as a whole and to the livelihood of the entire population. For example, the energy-resource industries, the postal-service industry, and the telecommunications industries are almost 100 percent in the hands of the state-owned economy; within the transportation industrial sector, the railroads and the long-distance maritime transportation industry are basically controlled by the state-owned economy; of the total amount of goods transported and handled by the transportation industrial sector as a whole, more than 97 percent is handled by state-owned economies. Although the nonâstate-owned economy has already come to manage a considerable portion of the value-added communications industry and the non-basic communications industry, state-owned economies remain the primary force in the basic communications service industrial sector. In recent years, banks operating under a shareholding system, credit cooperatives and credit unions, and nonâstate-owned insurance companies have experienced relatively rapid growth, and have come to occupy a considerable share of the market in these financial industries; and yet, in the financial industrial sector as a whole, the state-owned banks continue to control over 90 percent of the deposit and loan business in banking, and the People's Insurance Corporation [a state-owned economic entity] controls more than 90 percent of all insurance business in the nation. Furthermore, in the stocks and securities industry, the state-owned securities corporations remain dominant. In the manufacturing industrial sector, the state-owned economy continues to make up a very large proportion of all the major industries and trades. In 1995, 78.1 percent of the overall output value of mining industries, 67.5 percent of the output of raw industrial material, and 78.5 percent of the output in the electrical-power, gas, and water-supply industries were all under the state-owned economy. In the processing industries sector, the share of the state-owned economy is relatively less, but even here, if we were to define enterprises in which state ownership controls more than 50 percent of the stocks/shares as part of the state-owned economy, there would be a substantial increase in the state-owned economic sector's share of the output in the processing industries as well.","PeriodicalId":45785,"journal":{"name":"CHINESE ECONOMY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/CES1097-1475300633","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69417063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1997-11-01DOI: 10.2753/CES1097-1475300666
Fang Xiangdong
For more than the past decade there has been a period of rapid growth of the nonâstate-owned economy in our country. In the period from 1978 to 1994, the following areas of the nonâstate-owned economic sector and their average annual growth rates were: number of people employed, 8.8 percent; gross industrial output value in this sector, 28.2 percent; gross amount of retail commodity sales, 28.2 percent; and amount of fiscal revenue submitted to the government, 16.9 percent. In each case, these figures are far greater than those that pertain to the state-owned economic sector. In view of this, the relative weight of the nonâstate-owned economy in terms of [its contribution to] the number of nonagriculturally employed workers [in the economy as a whole] has risen from 36.5 percent in 1978 to 60.1 percent in 1993. The industrial output value accounted for by the nonâstate-owned sector has also risen from 22.4 percent of the total [in 1978] to 65.9 percent [in 1993]. Whereas in 1978 the nonâstate-owned economy accounted for 45.4 percent of the gross amount of retail sales of commodities in the national economy, in 1993, that figure rose to 68.1 percent, while its share of the fiscal revenues submitted to the government increased in the same period from 13.2 percent to 34.3 percent. Taking all of this into consideration, we may rightfully state the basic fact that the nonâstate-owned economy already makes up, or occupies, half of the national economy as a whole. In the following article we shall examine the state of development and growth in the various categories and types of nonâstate-owned economies in the past dozen years or so.
{"title":"On the Basic Current Conditions, Industrial and Trade Structures, and Industrial—Regional Distribution of Non—State-Owned Economies in Our Country","authors":"Fang Xiangdong","doi":"10.2753/CES1097-1475300666","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CES1097-1475300666","url":null,"abstract":"For more than the past decade there has been a period of rapid growth of the nonâstate-owned economy in our country. In the period from 1978 to 1994, the following areas of the nonâstate-owned economic sector and their average annual growth rates were: number of people employed, 8.8 percent; gross industrial output value in this sector, 28.2 percent; gross amount of retail commodity sales, 28.2 percent; and amount of fiscal revenue submitted to the government, 16.9 percent. In each case, these figures are far greater than those that pertain to the state-owned economic sector. In view of this, the relative weight of the nonâstate-owned economy in terms of [its contribution to] the number of nonagriculturally employed workers [in the economy as a whole] has risen from 36.5 percent in 1978 to 60.1 percent in 1993. The industrial output value accounted for by the nonâstate-owned sector has also risen from 22.4 percent of the total [in 1978] to 65.9 percent [in 1993]. Whereas in 1978 the nonâstate-owned economy accounted for 45.4 percent of the gross amount of retail sales of commodities in the national economy, in 1993, that figure rose to 68.1 percent, while its share of the fiscal revenues submitted to the government increased in the same period from 13.2 percent to 34.3 percent. Taking all of this into consideration, we may rightfully state the basic fact that the nonâstate-owned economy already makes up, or occupies, half of the national economy as a whole. In the following article we shall examine the state of development and growth in the various categories and types of nonâstate-owned economies in the past dozen years or so.","PeriodicalId":45785,"journal":{"name":"CHINESE ECONOMY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/CES1097-1475300666","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69417071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1997-09-01DOI: 10.2753/CES1097-147530056
Yang Xueye
On the dry, cracked land of the northern Huai River region in Anhui Province, a small group of emaciated men sat trembling in a dirt hut under the dim light of a kerosene lamp as they signed their names to a piece of yellow paper. ⦠On the upper portion of the document was written: "We hereby pledge to divide the land to individual households. ⦠If it fails, we know we will lose our heads. We have arranged for our children to be cared for until the age of 18." These were common folks without much educationâperhaps no more than elementary schoolingâbut what they did that day was to release a force of social energy that could not be terminated.
{"title":"Preface >b>December 1978. Depth of winter. China.>/b>","authors":"Yang Xueye","doi":"10.2753/CES1097-147530056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CES1097-147530056","url":null,"abstract":"On the dry, cracked land of the northern Huai River region in Anhui Province, a small group of emaciated men sat trembling in a dirt hut under the dim light of a kerosene lamp as they signed their names to a piece of yellow paper. ⦠On the upper portion of the document was written: \"We hereby pledge to divide the land to individual households. ⦠If it fails, we know we will lose our heads. We have arranged for our children to be cared for until the age of 18.\" These were common folks without much educationâperhaps no more than elementary schoolingâbut what they did that day was to release a force of social energy that could not be terminated.","PeriodicalId":45785,"journal":{"name":"CHINESE ECONOMY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"1997-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/CES1097-147530056","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69417053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1997-07-01DOI: 10.2753/CES1097-1475300453
Yan Qixian
The problem of reforming state-owned enterprises [SOEs] is currently a most critical issue in our country's economic development and economic reform; one may say that it is also a major and difficult hurdle that confronts us. At the moment, the large numbers of nonâstate-owned enterprises in our country, for the most part, are already basically able to operate in accordance with market-economic principles; what seriously lags behind are the SOEs. To date, with the exception of an extremely small number, the SOEs are still incompatible with the development of socialized mass production and with the market economy. Unless we break through this barrier, not only will we be unable to establish a socialist market economic system, but we will also be unable to bring about a benign cycle in the economy as a whole, or sustained, speedy, and healthy development.
{"title":"Rational Thoughts on Reforming State-Owned Enterprises","authors":"Yan Qixian","doi":"10.2753/CES1097-1475300453","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CES1097-1475300453","url":null,"abstract":"The problem of reforming state-owned enterprises [SOEs] is currently a most critical issue in our country's economic development and economic reform; one may say that it is also a major and difficult hurdle that confronts us. At the moment, the large numbers of nonâstate-owned enterprises in our country, for the most part, are already basically able to operate in accordance with market-economic principles; what seriously lags behind are the SOEs. To date, with the exception of an extremely small number, the SOEs are still incompatible with the development of socialized mass production and with the market economy. Unless we break through this barrier, not only will we be unable to establish a socialist market economic system, but we will also be unable to bring about a benign cycle in the economy as a whole, or sustained, speedy, and healthy development.","PeriodicalId":45785,"journal":{"name":"CHINESE ECONOMY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"1997-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/CES1097-1475300453","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69417018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1997-05-01DOI: 10.2753/CES1097-1475300384
Zhou Shijian
In June 1995, when Lee Teng-hui visited the United States, SinoâAmerican relations fell to their lowest point since the establishment of diplomatic relations. In the spring of 1996, our troops conducted military maneuvers in the Taiwan Strait, and the United States dispatched two aircraft carriers to the Taiwan Strait to back up and encourage the Taiwan Independence forces. China and the United States were almost on the verge of "drawing swords and arming crossbows."
{"title":"The Influence of the New Clinton Government on SinoâAmerican Economic and Trade Relations","authors":"Zhou Shijian","doi":"10.2753/CES1097-1475300384","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CES1097-1475300384","url":null,"abstract":"In June 1995, when Lee Teng-hui visited the United States, SinoâAmerican relations fell to their lowest point since the establishment of diplomatic relations. In the spring of 1996, our troops conducted military maneuvers in the Taiwan Strait, and the United States dispatched two aircraft carriers to the Taiwan Strait to back up and encourage the Taiwan Independence forces. China and the United States were almost on the verge of \"drawing swords and arming crossbows.\"","PeriodicalId":45785,"journal":{"name":"CHINESE ECONOMY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"1997-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/CES1097-1475300384","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69417008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1997-05-01DOI: 10.2753/CES1097-147530037
Zhong Zhengyan
Using direct investments from abroad is an important component of China's opening up to the outside and is an effective way of using external resources for the purpose of speeding up China's economic construction. Since reform and openness, our country's work of utilizing foreign capital has scored enormous achievements. In recent years, along with the accelerating process of integration of the world economy and the increase in investments by transnational corporations, China's practice of utilizing foreign capital has come up against a new situation; new circumstances and new problems have arisen and new comments and views have also emerged in society with regard to the use of foreign capital. Some of the comments are highly critical of the use of foreign capital. Hence, a conscientious summing up of China's experience with direct foreign investment, an objective assessment of the position and effect of direct foreign investment in our country's construction of a socialist market economy, clarification of some muddled understanding in quarters concerned about the utilization of foreign capital, and, from there, a definition of the long-term strategy for China's use of foreign capital and the adjustment of relevant policies continue to be urgent tasks of real significance.
{"title":"My Understanding of the Relationship Between Using Foreign Business Investments and Protecting National Industries","authors":"Zhong Zhengyan","doi":"10.2753/CES1097-147530037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CES1097-147530037","url":null,"abstract":"Using direct investments from abroad is an important component of China's opening up to the outside and is an effective way of using external resources for the purpose of speeding up China's economic construction. Since reform and openness, our country's work of utilizing foreign capital has scored enormous achievements. In recent years, along with the accelerating process of integration of the world economy and the increase in investments by transnational corporations, China's practice of utilizing foreign capital has come up against a new situation; new circumstances and new problems have arisen and new comments and views have also emerged in society with regard to the use of foreign capital. Some of the comments are highly critical of the use of foreign capital. Hence, a conscientious summing up of China's experience with direct foreign investment, an objective assessment of the position and effect of direct foreign investment in our country's construction of a socialist market economy, clarification of some muddled understanding in quarters concerned about the utilization of foreign capital, and, from there, a definition of the long-term strategy for China's use of foreign capital and the adjustment of relevant policies continue to be urgent tasks of real significance.","PeriodicalId":45785,"journal":{"name":"CHINESE ECONOMY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"1997-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/CES1097-147530037","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69416996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1997-03-01DOI: 10.2753/CES1097-147530026
Wu Bangguo
>i>Comrades:>/i> The leadership of the Central Party School wants me to introduce to you some of the current situation with regard to the reform and development of state-owned enterprises. In general, since the beginning of reform and opening up, our country's state-owned enterprises have continued to grow and get stronger in the course of deepening reform. In particular, in recent years, the dynamics of reform have intensified gradually and the pace has accelerated, and with that, we have made many fruitful explorations, blazed some paths, accumulated many valuable experiences, and achieved a certain measure of successâthe situation with regard to the reform and growth of state-owned enterprises is a good one. Nonetheless, in this process, there are indeed some difficulties and problems. With regard to the problems of the reform and growth of state-owned enterprises, in the following I shall share my opinions on three areas that seem to concern everyone. There are some other opinions that I have already shared at last year's Central Party School colloquium, and I shall not repeat them here.
{"title":"Several Questions Concerning the Reform and Development of State-Owned Enterprises (October 25, 1996)","authors":"Wu Bangguo","doi":"10.2753/CES1097-147530026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CES1097-147530026","url":null,"abstract":">i>Comrades:>/i> The leadership of the Central Party School wants me to introduce to you some of the current situation with regard to the reform and development of state-owned enterprises. In general, since the beginning of reform and opening up, our country's state-owned enterprises have continued to grow and get stronger in the course of deepening reform. In particular, in recent years, the dynamics of reform have intensified gradually and the pace has accelerated, and with that, we have made many fruitful explorations, blazed some paths, accumulated many valuable experiences, and achieved a certain measure of successâthe situation with regard to the reform and growth of state-owned enterprises is a good one. Nonetheless, in this process, there are indeed some difficulties and problems. With regard to the problems of the reform and growth of state-owned enterprises, in the following I shall share my opinions on three areas that seem to concern everyone. There are some other opinions that I have already shared at last year's Central Party School colloquium, and I shall not repeat them here.","PeriodicalId":45785,"journal":{"name":"CHINESE ECONOMY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"1997-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/CES1097-147530026","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69416962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1997-01-01DOI: 10.2753/CES1097-1475300194
Wu Jing-lian
In the preceding articles, we have discussed such issues as what constitutes a modern enterprise system and how to set up such a system. The fact is that enterprises do not exist in isolation but are closely connected with all other facets of the economic system. Thus, enterprise reform and setting up a modern enterprise system must proceed in concert with reforms in other fields. In this article, we will explore the complementary relationships between enterprise reform and reforms in other fields.
{"title":"Complementary Relationships Between Enterprise Reform and Reforms in Other Fields","authors":"Wu Jing-lian","doi":"10.2753/CES1097-1475300194","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2753/CES1097-1475300194","url":null,"abstract":"In the preceding articles, we have discussed such issues as what constitutes a modern enterprise system and how to set up such a system. The fact is that enterprises do not exist in isolation but are closely connected with all other facets of the economic system. Thus, enterprise reform and setting up a modern enterprise system must proceed in concert with reforms in other fields. In this article, we will explore the complementary relationships between enterprise reform and reforms in other fields.","PeriodicalId":45785,"journal":{"name":"CHINESE ECONOMY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/CES1097-1475300194","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69416951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：