Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.2979/vic.2023.a911106
Andrea Kaston Tange
Abstract: Victorian "hidden mother" photographs are portraits of babies in which adult figures are draped with textiles, blocked with furniture, tucked behind a mat, orotherwise (often ineffectively) obscured. Fascination with them habitually turns on their presumed erasure of nineteenth-century women's labor; however, modern assumptions about the production of these photos have shaped consumption of them. This essay locates these images within multiple contexts: the technologies of their production, growingsentimental ideals of middle-class motherhood, and the ways that carework and its cultural (in)visibilities varied widely by gender, race, and class in the period. Arguing thatthe mother figures' persistent presence (not hiddenness) is fundamental to these photographs, this essay makes a case for reading them as revealing intimacies and documenting tenderness rather than evincing erasures.
{"title":"Gestures of Connection: Victorian Technologies of Photography and Visible Mothering","authors":"Andrea Kaston Tange","doi":"10.2979/vic.2023.a911106","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/vic.2023.a911106","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Victorian \"hidden mother\" photographs are portraits of babies in which adult figures are draped with textiles, blocked with furniture, tucked behind a mat, orotherwise (often ineffectively) obscured. Fascination with them habitually turns on their presumed erasure of nineteenth-century women's labor; however, modern assumptions about the production of these photos have shaped consumption of them. This essay locates these images within multiple contexts: the technologies of their production, growingsentimental ideals of middle-class motherhood, and the ways that carework and its cultural (in)visibilities varied widely by gender, race, and class in the period. Arguing thatthe mother figures' persistent presence (not hiddenness) is fundamental to these photographs, this essay makes a case for reading them as revealing intimacies and documenting tenderness rather than evincing erasures.","PeriodicalId":45845,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN STUDIES","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135448357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.2979/vic.2023.a911118
Reviewed by: Victorian Pilgrimage: Sacred-Secular Dualism in the Novels of Charlotte Brontë, Elizabeth Gaskell, and George Eliot by M. Joan Chard Thomas Albrecht (bio) Victorian Pilgrimage: Sacred-Secular Dualism in the Novels of Charlotte Brontë, Elizabeth Gaskell, and George Eliot, by M. Joan Chard; pp. xii + 156. New York: Peter Lang, 2019, $95.15, $89.20 ebook. In a chapter devoted to George Eliot, M. Joan Chard asserts, "The path taken by Eliot's characters on their spiritual journeys … leads to a purely humanistic response to life." Chard then supplements her images of path and journey with a musical metaphor, "Scenes of Clerical Life, the starting-point for Eliot's literary pilgrimage, introduces in the manner of an overture the dominant motif which is orchestrated in increasing complexity and [End Page 321] variation throughout [Eliot's] novels until it reaches its fullest expression in the finale, Daniel Deronda" (111). Chard's metaphors in these sentences are revealing not only about Eliot's literary project as she interprets it, but about her own project in Victorian Pilgrimage: Sacred-Secular Dualism in the Novels of Charlotte Brontë, Elizabeth Gaskell, and George Eliot. In the book, Chard takes as her topic the predominant Victorian theme of pilgrimage, which according to these sentences manifests itself in Eliot's novels as an increasing fusion of the spiritual with the humanistic. And as her sentences suggest, Chard complementarily conceives of the oeuvres and literary trajectories of each of the writers she examines (Eliot, Charlotte Brontë, Elizabeth Gaskell) as themselves constituting teleological progressions, a form of pilgrimage. Chard repeatedly traces plot and character trajectories in individual works by Brontë, Gaskell, and Eliot that she argues are cast by those novelists as figurative pilgrimages. Her readings of Brontë generally define these pilgrimages as reconciliations within an individual character's mind of the sacred and the secular. Her readings of Gaskell define pilgrimages as reconciliations within a given social context of an individual character with some form of wider community, while her readings of Eliot define them as reconciliations of the human with the religious. As in the works of Brontë and Gaskell, Eliot's reconciliations fuse sacred and secular, and individual and community. In the works of all three novelists, Chard repeatedly finds versions of pilgrimage that transcend restrictive forms of Victorian dualism and thereby move from states of disconnection to states of reconciliation, from states of rupture to states of union. Chard clearly indicates the broader critical stakes of her readings and of exploring the significance of Christian motifs like pilgrimage within the social, political, and ethical agendas of three fundamentally secular novelists. For instance, Chard's reading of Brontë through the pilgrimage paradigm would rebut commonplace assumptions that Brontë's feminism is founded on her
书评:维多利亚朝圣:夏洛特小说中的神圣-世俗二元论Brontë,伊丽莎白·盖斯凯尔和乔治·艾略特作者:M.琼·查德托马斯·阿尔布雷希特(传记)维多利亚朝圣:夏洛特小说中的神圣-世俗二元论Brontë,伊丽莎白·盖斯凯尔和乔治·艾略特作者:M.琼·查德;Pp. xii + 156纽约:Peter Lang出版社,2019年,95.15美元,电子书89.20美元。在专门讨论乔治·艾略特的一章中,琼·查德断言:“艾略特笔下的人物在精神旅程中所走的道路……导致了对生活的纯粹人文主义回应。”然后查德用一个音乐隐喻补充了她的道路和旅程的形象,“牧师生活的场景,艾略特文学朝圣的起点,以序曲的方式引入了主导主题,这个主题在艾略特的小说中越来越复杂和变化,直到它在最后的丹尼尔·德隆达中达到了最充分的表达”(111)。查德在这些句子中的隐喻不仅揭示了艾略特的文学计划,也揭示了她自己在维多利亚朝圣中的计划:夏洛特小说中的神圣-世俗二元论Brontë,伊丽莎白·盖斯凯尔,和乔治·艾略特。在书中,查德以维多利亚时代的朝圣主题为主题,根据这些句子,这在艾略特的小说中表现为精神与人文的日益融合。正如她的句子所暗示的那样,查德将她所考察的每一位作家(艾略特、夏洛特Brontë、伊丽莎白·盖斯凯尔)的全部作品和文学轨迹互补地视为自己构成了目的论的进步,一种朝圣的形式。查德在Brontë、盖斯凯尔和艾略特的作品中反复追溯情节和人物轨迹,她认为这些小说家将其塑造成具象的朝圣之旅。她对Brontë的阅读通常将这些朝圣定义为个人思想中神圣与世俗的和解。她对盖斯凯尔的解读将朝圣定义为在特定社会背景下的个人角色与某种形式的更广泛的群体的和解,而她对艾略特的解读则将朝圣定义为人类与宗教的和解。正如Brontë和Gaskell的作品一样,艾略特的和解融合了神圣与世俗,个人与社会。在这三位小说家的作品中,查德反复发现不同版本的朝圣超越了维多利亚二元论的限制形式,从而从分离的状态转变为和解的状态,从破裂的状态转变为结合的状态。查德清楚地指出了她的阅读和探索基督教主题的意义的更广泛的关键利害关系,比如朝圣在三个基本世俗小说家的社会、政治和伦理议程中。例如,查德通过朝圣范式解读Brontë,反驳了人们的普遍假设,即Brontë的女权主义是建立在她拒绝基督教的父权制、伪善和专制的基础上的。她论证了Brontë的女权主义建立在一种基督教的基础上,这种基督教的定义不是严格的虔诚或被动的顺从,而是精神与身体、理想与物质、女人与男人的超越性融合。她的观点是Brontë既不是一个正统的基督徒(正如一些批评家所认为的那样),也不是一个反对基督教的女权主义者(正如许多其他人所认为的那样)。相反,查德坚持认为,她是一位作家,她的复杂女权主义以独特的基督教术语定义自己,她对朝圣实现的愿景融合了女权主义和基督教,世俗和神圣的记录。同样,查德的目的是反驳把盖斯凯尔简单地视为社会和政治上的保守派作家,或者从根本上说是个人作家而不是政治作家的观点。她对盖斯凯尔微妙而非二重性的描写揭示了一个小说家的作品,他将个人与社会和政治融合在一起,将政治对抗的冲动与和解的冲动结合在一起。查德在这三位作家身上反复追踪的和解与团结的运动与她的批判方法相关联。有人甚至会说,他们是基于这种方法。正如我对艾略特的开篇引语所暗示的那样,查德以两种方式对待每位小说家的作品:一是作为一种“整体性的愿景”,一种基本上连贯的内部统一,就像她对音乐作品的比喻所暗示的那样(119);第二,作为向“最充分表达”(111)的目的论进展,“追求……
{"title":"Victorian Pilgrimage: Sacred-Secular Dualism in the Novels of Charlotte Brontë, Elizabeth Gaskell, and George Eliot by M. Joan Chard (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.2979/vic.2023.a911118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/vic.2023.a911118","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Victorian Pilgrimage: Sacred-Secular Dualism in the Novels of Charlotte Brontë, Elizabeth Gaskell, and George Eliot by M. Joan Chard Thomas Albrecht (bio) Victorian Pilgrimage: Sacred-Secular Dualism in the Novels of Charlotte Brontë, Elizabeth Gaskell, and George Eliot, by M. Joan Chard; pp. xii + 156. New York: Peter Lang, 2019, $95.15, $89.20 ebook. In a chapter devoted to George Eliot, M. Joan Chard asserts, \"The path taken by Eliot's characters on their spiritual journeys … leads to a purely humanistic response to life.\" Chard then supplements her images of path and journey with a musical metaphor, \"Scenes of Clerical Life, the starting-point for Eliot's literary pilgrimage, introduces in the manner of an overture the dominant motif which is orchestrated in increasing complexity and [End Page 321] variation throughout [Eliot's] novels until it reaches its fullest expression in the finale, Daniel Deronda\" (111). Chard's metaphors in these sentences are revealing not only about Eliot's literary project as she interprets it, but about her own project in Victorian Pilgrimage: Sacred-Secular Dualism in the Novels of Charlotte Brontë, Elizabeth Gaskell, and George Eliot. In the book, Chard takes as her topic the predominant Victorian theme of pilgrimage, which according to these sentences manifests itself in Eliot's novels as an increasing fusion of the spiritual with the humanistic. And as her sentences suggest, Chard complementarily conceives of the oeuvres and literary trajectories of each of the writers she examines (Eliot, Charlotte Brontë, Elizabeth Gaskell) as themselves constituting teleological progressions, a form of pilgrimage. Chard repeatedly traces plot and character trajectories in individual works by Brontë, Gaskell, and Eliot that she argues are cast by those novelists as figurative pilgrimages. Her readings of Brontë generally define these pilgrimages as reconciliations within an individual character's mind of the sacred and the secular. Her readings of Gaskell define pilgrimages as reconciliations within a given social context of an individual character with some form of wider community, while her readings of Eliot define them as reconciliations of the human with the religious. As in the works of Brontë and Gaskell, Eliot's reconciliations fuse sacred and secular, and individual and community. In the works of all three novelists, Chard repeatedly finds versions of pilgrimage that transcend restrictive forms of Victorian dualism and thereby move from states of disconnection to states of reconciliation, from states of rupture to states of union. Chard clearly indicates the broader critical stakes of her readings and of exploring the significance of Christian motifs like pilgrimage within the social, political, and ethical agendas of three fundamentally secular novelists. For instance, Chard's reading of Brontë through the pilgrimage paradigm would rebut commonplace assumptions that Brontë's feminism is founded on her ","PeriodicalId":45845,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN STUDIES","volume":"2016 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135448360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.2979/vic.2023.a911126
Reviewed by: Charles Kingsley: Faith, Flesh, and Fantasy ed. by Jonathan Conlin and Jan Marten Ivo Klaver Oded Steinberg (bio) Charles Kingsley: Faith, Flesh, and Fantasy, edited by Jonathan Conlin and Jan Marten Ivo Klaver; pp. 284. New York: Routledge, 2021, $170.00, $52.95 paper, $47.65 ebook. In the preface to the new edition of Charles Kingsley's The Roman and the Teuton (1864), published a short while after his death, his close friend and scholar of Comparative Languages Friedrich Max Müller wrote: "Charles Kingsley will be missed in England, in the English colonies, in America … aye, wherever Saxon speech and Saxon thought is understood. He will be mourned for, yearned for, in every place in which he passed some days of his busy life" ([Macmillan and Co., 1889], 1). Indeed, the industrious life of the famous novelist and "polymath" Victorian Kingsley—with all his inner doubts, contradictions, and controversies—is studied magnificently in this new volume edited by Jonathan Conlin and Jan Marten Ivo Klaver (251). Charles Kingsley: Faith, Flesh, and Fantasy includes fourteen essays (not including a foreword and an afterword) on the different facets of Kingsley's life, delving into his personal life, Christian attitudes, racial perceptions, and of course his celebrated and less celebrated novels. Kingsley was a man of contradictions, a Christian socialist who supported the South during the American Civil War, a fervent Anglo-Saxonist who advocated for racial mixing, and a devoted Christian who supported some aspects of the theory of evolution. Instead of adopting a binary perspective, a recent trend of many works, labelling historical figures or phenomena under the simplistic verdicts of good or bad, the volume presents a far more composite approach throughout. The volume does not shy away from Kingsley's contentious ideas, while also discussing his contribution to Victorian culture and beyond. The question of Kingsley's perception of race is, without a doubt, situated in the heart of these contentious ideas. There is no coincidence, therefore, that Müller praised Kingsley as a symbol of (Anglo-)Saxonism. As evident throughout the volume, [End Page 337] Kingsley's understanding of Anglo-Saxonism or Teutonism includes complex racial, national, and religious identities. Simon Goldhill's chapter underscores this complexity as he shows how Kingsley's Hypatia, or New Foes with an Old Face (1853) lauded the benefits of racial mixing in Alexandria between the Teuton and Roman as the key to racial growth and Christian success. His treatment of the Irish, Norman Vance illustrates, is further evidence of Kingsley's support of racial mixture, claiming that such process may benefit the English. However, as Theodore Koditschek and Goldhill show, this argument for miscegenation did not mean that Kingsley was refuting any notion of Anglo-Saxon superiority. As a liberal scholar, it is argued, Kingsley mediated complex ideas such as race to a larger audience.
《查尔斯·金斯利:信仰、肉体和幻想》,乔纳森·科林和简·马丁·伊沃·克拉弗主编;284页。纽约:劳特利奇出版社,2021,170.00美元,纸质书52.95美元,电子书47.65美元。在查尔斯·金斯利死后不久出版的新版《罗马人和条顿人》(the Roman and the Teuton, 1864)的序言中,他的密友、比较语言学者弗里德里希·马克斯·梅勒(Friedrich Max m ller)写道:“查尔斯·金斯利将在英国、英国殖民地、美国……是的,在任何能理解撒克逊人语言和思想的地方被怀念。”在他度过忙碌生活的每一个地方,人们都会哀悼他,怀念他”([麦克米伦公司,1889],1)。事实上,著名小说家和“博学家”维多利亚·金斯利的勤劳生活——以及他所有的内心怀疑、矛盾和争议——在这本由乔纳森·科林和简·马滕·伊沃·克拉弗编辑的新书中得到了精彩的研究。《查尔斯·金斯利:信仰、肉体和幻想》包括14篇文章(不包括前言和后记),讲述了金斯利生活的不同方面,深入探讨了他的个人生活、基督教态度、种族观念,当然还有他著名的和不太出名的小说。金斯利是一个充满矛盾的人,他是一个在美国内战期间支持南方的基督教社会主义者,是一个倡导种族混合的狂热盎格鲁-撒克逊主义者,也是一个支持进化论某些方面的虔诚基督徒。而不是采用二进制的角度来看,最近的趋势,许多作品,标签的历史人物或现象下的简单判决的好或坏,该卷提出了一个更综合的方法贯穿。这本书并没有回避金斯利有争议的观点,同时也讨论了他对维多利亚文化和其他文化的贡献。毫无疑问,金斯利对种族的看法是这些有争议的观点的核心。因此,米勒女士称赞金斯利是盎格鲁-撒克逊主义的象征,这并非巧合。纵观全书,金斯利对盎格鲁-撒克逊主义或条顿主义的理解包括复杂的种族、民族和宗教身份。西蒙·戈德希尔的章节强调了这种复杂性,他展示了金斯利的《旧面孔的新敌人》(1853)是如何称赞条顿人和罗马人在亚历山大的种族混合的好处,认为这是种族发展和基督教成功的关键。诺曼·万斯(Norman Vance)指出,金斯利对待爱尔兰人的方式进一步证明了他支持种族混合,声称这种过程可能有利于英国人。然而,正如西奥多·科迪切克和戈德希尔所表明的那样,这种通婚的论点并不意味着金斯利驳斥了盎格鲁-撒克逊人优越的任何观念。有人认为,作为一名自由派学者,金斯利将种族等复杂的思想传播给了更多的读者。皮尔斯·j·黑尔认为,“进化”是金斯利试图通过《水中婴儿》(1863)向英国儿童宣传的另一个新兴概念。金斯利认为,年轻一代必须明白,上帝和自然之间不存在矛盾。艾伦·劳奇也通过《水中的婴儿》表明,宗教与科学之间的和解是通过死亡在这两个领域都保留了意义这一事实。金斯利认为,这种将宗教与进化融合在一起的平衡,只有在新教和条顿人的英格兰(也许还有一些德国实体)才有可能实现。对金斯利来说,条顿和新教英格兰的另一个优势是其“男子气概”的特点,这使它有别于天主教国家的“柔弱”(1,71)。詹姆斯·伊莱·亚当斯(James Eli Adams)写道,金斯利(Kingsley)将“娘娘腔”一词用于各种用途,包括描述英国的“国民福祉”(76)。在一次演讲中,金斯利在剑桥大学的学生面前说,英国比欧洲其他任何地方都更成功地珍视日耳曼人对男子气概和自由的价值观,同时避免了罗马和天主教的女性影响:“我们英国的法律,我们英国关于正义和仁慈的观念,比大多数欧洲法典更能保留旧日耳曼法律的自由、真实和仁慈……英国比任何其他国家都更能摆脱腐朽的罗马文明的污点”(Roman, 266)……
{"title":"Charles Kingsley: Faith, Flesh, and Fantasy ed. by Jonathan Conlin and Jan Marten Ivo Klaver (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.2979/vic.2023.a911126","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/vic.2023.a911126","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Charles Kingsley: Faith, Flesh, and Fantasy ed. by Jonathan Conlin and Jan Marten Ivo Klaver Oded Steinberg (bio) Charles Kingsley: Faith, Flesh, and Fantasy, edited by Jonathan Conlin and Jan Marten Ivo Klaver; pp. 284. New York: Routledge, 2021, $170.00, $52.95 paper, $47.65 ebook. In the preface to the new edition of Charles Kingsley's The Roman and the Teuton (1864), published a short while after his death, his close friend and scholar of Comparative Languages Friedrich Max Müller wrote: \"Charles Kingsley will be missed in England, in the English colonies, in America … aye, wherever Saxon speech and Saxon thought is understood. He will be mourned for, yearned for, in every place in which he passed some days of his busy life\" ([Macmillan and Co., 1889], 1). Indeed, the industrious life of the famous novelist and \"polymath\" Victorian Kingsley—with all his inner doubts, contradictions, and controversies—is studied magnificently in this new volume edited by Jonathan Conlin and Jan Marten Ivo Klaver (251). Charles Kingsley: Faith, Flesh, and Fantasy includes fourteen essays (not including a foreword and an afterword) on the different facets of Kingsley's life, delving into his personal life, Christian attitudes, racial perceptions, and of course his celebrated and less celebrated novels. Kingsley was a man of contradictions, a Christian socialist who supported the South during the American Civil War, a fervent Anglo-Saxonist who advocated for racial mixing, and a devoted Christian who supported some aspects of the theory of evolution. Instead of adopting a binary perspective, a recent trend of many works, labelling historical figures or phenomena under the simplistic verdicts of good or bad, the volume presents a far more composite approach throughout. The volume does not shy away from Kingsley's contentious ideas, while also discussing his contribution to Victorian culture and beyond. The question of Kingsley's perception of race is, without a doubt, situated in the heart of these contentious ideas. There is no coincidence, therefore, that Müller praised Kingsley as a symbol of (Anglo-)Saxonism. As evident throughout the volume, [End Page 337] Kingsley's understanding of Anglo-Saxonism or Teutonism includes complex racial, national, and religious identities. Simon Goldhill's chapter underscores this complexity as he shows how Kingsley's Hypatia, or New Foes with an Old Face (1853) lauded the benefits of racial mixing in Alexandria between the Teuton and Roman as the key to racial growth and Christian success. His treatment of the Irish, Norman Vance illustrates, is further evidence of Kingsley's support of racial mixture, claiming that such process may benefit the English. However, as Theodore Koditschek and Goldhill show, this argument for miscegenation did not mean that Kingsley was refuting any notion of Anglo-Saxon superiority. As a liberal scholar, it is argued, Kingsley mediated complex ideas such as race to a larger audience. ","PeriodicalId":45845,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN STUDIES","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135448364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.2979/vic.2023.a911108
Toby Harper
Abstract: Victorian Britons were interested in encounters between humans and fish for many reasons: fishing for sport as opposed to food gathering was expanding rapidly in popularity; fishing was practiced by many different people in many ways around the world; and fish populations were visibly suffering from pollution, overfishing, and terrain modification. This article analyzes the changing meanings of these encounters through addressing the beliefs about fish pain held by Victorian anglers. These beliefs were intertwined with ideas about race, food, civilization, and class. Elite British anglers increasingly understood their relationship with fish and their own capacity to feel pain (and to judge others' pain) as a justification of their place as the managers and stewards of all fisheries, not just those in Britain.
{"title":"Fish Pain and Human Sport in Victorian Britain","authors":"Toby Harper","doi":"10.2979/vic.2023.a911108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/vic.2023.a911108","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Victorian Britons were interested in encounters between humans and fish for many reasons: fishing for sport as opposed to food gathering was expanding rapidly in popularity; fishing was practiced by many different people in many ways around the world; and fish populations were visibly suffering from pollution, overfishing, and terrain modification. This article analyzes the changing meanings of these encounters through addressing the beliefs about fish pain held by Victorian anglers. These beliefs were intertwined with ideas about race, food, civilization, and class. Elite British anglers increasingly understood their relationship with fish and their own capacity to feel pain (and to judge others' pain) as a justification of their place as the managers and stewards of all fisheries, not just those in Britain.","PeriodicalId":45845,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN STUDIES","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135448330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.2979/vic.2023.a911115
Reviewed by: Cities, Mountains and Being Modern in fin-de-siècle England and Germany by Ben Anderson Simon Bainbridge (bio) Cities, Mountains and Being Modern in fin-de-siècle England and Germany, by Ben Anderson; pp. xi + 301. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, $89.99, $69.99 ebook. The development of mountaineering as a leisure pursuit is often seen as driven by the desire to escape both modernity and the city, with its early origins linked to the industrial revolution and urban growth. The poet and pioneering scrambler Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who made the first recorded use of the word mountaineering in 1802, compared himself to the figures of the shepherd and chamois hunter, suggesting a search for a preindustrial, mountain-based identity. However, examining the remarkable period of mountaineering's evolution in Europe roughly a century after Coleridge's groundbreaking exploits, Ben Anderson offers a striking reconceptualization of upland activity, arguing not only that most mountaineers were "urban people" who "lived, worked and spent most of their leisure time in Europe's towns and cities" but also that they were quintessentially modern (25). In his fascinating and richly detailed study Cities, Mountains and Being Modern in fin-de-siècle England and Germany, Anderson argues that the mountains provided a location for the performance and contesting of different forms of modernity, showing how upland environments were physically and imaginatively shaped by values that came from the cities. Anderson's focus is on Manchester, Munich, and Vienna in the decades leading up to 1914; he brilliantly traces the presence of the mountains in these cities and reveals how their residents took their ambitions to be modern into the high places, particularly the English Lake District and the Eastern Alps. He draws illuminatingly on the archives of several mountaineering and rambling clubs and associations, including those of the Co-operative Holidays Association, the Rucksack Club, the Deutsche und Oesterreichische Alpenverein, Touristenverein "Die Naturfreunde," Oesterreichische Touristen-Club, and Oesterreichische Alpenclub (10). While remaining attentive to local and national detail, Anderson examines how these organizations shared a view of mountaineering and rambling that justified the activities as exercises in self-improvement and progress; ascent facilitated mental and physical strengthening that in turn could regenerate society. Reversing a familiar binary, Anderson shows how mountains became a part of city life through exhibitions and displays in a range of civic environments as well as through the discussions and initiatives of those who climbed the peaks. His writing on the role of Alpine panoramas and landscape reliefs is particularly interesting, describing them as forms that "promised complete knowledge, and control, of a landscape—these were celebrations (or fantasies) of human sovereignty over self and nature" (107). Anderson presents this mo
书评:《城市、山脉与现代:英格兰和德国的末日》,作者:本·安德森;第xi + 301页。伦敦:Palgrave Macmillan出版社,2020年,89.99美元,电子书69.99美元。作为一种休闲追求,登山运动的发展通常被认为是由逃避现代性和城市的愿望所驱动的,其早期起源与工业革命和城市发展有关。诗人、登山家先驱塞缪尔·泰勒·柯勒律治(Samuel Taylor Coleridge)在1802年首次使用了“登山”这个词,他把自己比作牧羊人和羚羊猎人,暗示人们在寻找一种工业化前的、以山区为基础的身份。然而,在考察了柯勒律治的突破性成就后大约一个世纪的登山运动在欧洲发展的非凡时期后,本·安德森对高地活动提出了一个惊人的重新概念,认为大多数登山者不仅是“城市人”,他们“在欧洲的城镇生活、工作和度过大部分闲暇时间”,而且他们是典型的现代人(25)。安德森在《城市、山脉和现代》一书中指出,山脉为不同形式的现代性的表现和竞争提供了一个场所,展示了来自城市的价值观是如何在物质上和想象上塑造高地环境的。安德森关注的是1914年前几十年的曼彻斯特、慕尼黑和维也纳;他出色地追溯了这些城市中山脉的存在,揭示了这些城市的居民是如何将他们的现代化野心带到了高海拔地区,尤其是英格兰湖区和东阿尔卑斯山。他生动地描述了几个登山和漫游俱乐部和协会的档案,包括合作假日协会、背包俱乐部、德国登山协会、自然之旅协会、登山俱乐部和登山俱乐部。在关注当地和全国细节的同时,安德森考察了这些组织是如何共享登山和漫步的观点,并将这些活动视为自我完善和进步的练习;上升促进了精神和身体的增强,从而可以再生社会。Anderson颠倒了一个熟悉的二元结构,通过一系列城市环境中的展览和展示,以及那些攀登山峰的人的讨论和倡议,展示了山脉是如何成为城市生活的一部分的。他关于阿尔卑斯全景图和景观浮雕的著作特别有趣,他将它们描述为“承诺对景观的完全了解和控制——这些是人类对自我和自然主权的庆祝(或幻想)”(107)。安德森将现代对山脉的反应描述为“与浪漫主义对景观的理解脱节”,尽管这段历史可能比浪漫主义/现代二元所允许的更复杂;托马斯·韦斯特在他的《湖泊指南》(1787)中著名的对观景台的识别,以及威廉·华兹华斯在他自己的《湖泊指南》(1822)中对阿尔卑斯浮雕模型的开篇描述,为安德森写得很好的现代人对居高远下的景观的兴趣提供了浪漫时期的相似之处(106)。安德森通过“从阿尔卑斯山的一端到另一端的密集的路径、小屋、观景点、路标、桥梁、梯子、电缆和木桩”的制作,展示了对整体景观的渴望如何塑造了山区环境,特别是东阿尔卑斯山。这些基础设施的发展,被安德森称为“有效约束旅游的新形式”的一个特点,最大限度地减少了到达指定景点所需的体力劳动,使山脉的视觉消费更容易,将具有挑战性的环境置于中产阶级观众的控制之下(112)。在关于“时间”的精彩章节中,安德森展示了这种对山脉的控制是如何在时间和空间方面实现的;登山者们不仅通过把过去归因于不现代的其他人来强调他们自己的现代性,特别是通过把高地地区和那里的居民描绘成原始的,而且他们还找到了各种方法把山脉带入“现代”的领域,例如通过“指南时间”来测量路线。登山者和步行者不仅……
{"title":"Cities, Mountains and Being Modern in fin-de-siècle England and Germany by Ben Anderson (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.2979/vic.2023.a911115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/vic.2023.a911115","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Cities, Mountains and Being Modern in fin-de-siècle England and Germany by Ben Anderson Simon Bainbridge (bio) Cities, Mountains and Being Modern in fin-de-siècle England and Germany, by Ben Anderson; pp. xi + 301. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, $89.99, $69.99 ebook. The development of mountaineering as a leisure pursuit is often seen as driven by the desire to escape both modernity and the city, with its early origins linked to the industrial revolution and urban growth. The poet and pioneering scrambler Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who made the first recorded use of the word mountaineering in 1802, compared himself to the figures of the shepherd and chamois hunter, suggesting a search for a preindustrial, mountain-based identity. However, examining the remarkable period of mountaineering's evolution in Europe roughly a century after Coleridge's groundbreaking exploits, Ben Anderson offers a striking reconceptualization of upland activity, arguing not only that most mountaineers were \"urban people\" who \"lived, worked and spent most of their leisure time in Europe's towns and cities\" but also that they were quintessentially modern (25). In his fascinating and richly detailed study Cities, Mountains and Being Modern in fin-de-siècle England and Germany, Anderson argues that the mountains provided a location for the performance and contesting of different forms of modernity, showing how upland environments were physically and imaginatively shaped by values that came from the cities. Anderson's focus is on Manchester, Munich, and Vienna in the decades leading up to 1914; he brilliantly traces the presence of the mountains in these cities and reveals how their residents took their ambitions to be modern into the high places, particularly the English Lake District and the Eastern Alps. He draws illuminatingly on the archives of several mountaineering and rambling clubs and associations, including those of the Co-operative Holidays Association, the Rucksack Club, the Deutsche und Oesterreichische Alpenverein, Touristenverein \"Die Naturfreunde,\" Oesterreichische Touristen-Club, and Oesterreichische Alpenclub (10). While remaining attentive to local and national detail, Anderson examines how these organizations shared a view of mountaineering and rambling that justified the activities as exercises in self-improvement and progress; ascent facilitated mental and physical strengthening that in turn could regenerate society. Reversing a familiar binary, Anderson shows how mountains became a part of city life through exhibitions and displays in a range of civic environments as well as through the discussions and initiatives of those who climbed the peaks. His writing on the role of Alpine panoramas and landscape reliefs is particularly interesting, describing them as forms that \"promised complete knowledge, and control, of a landscape—these were celebrations (or fantasies) of human sovereignty over self and nature\" (107). Anderson presents this mo","PeriodicalId":45845,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN STUDIES","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135448331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.2979/vic.2023.a911109
Thomas Dilworth, Michael Crawford
Abstract: Edward Lear was in the vanguard of cultural assimilation of evolutionary theory. In what amounts to a gestalt relationship, some of his published "nonsense" figures against, and largely derives its meaning from, innovation in the natural sciences. Certain of his works, some not previously interpreted, are specific in their engagement with evolutionists, including Erasmus and Charles Darwin, Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, and Robert Grant. Before and after the appearance of On the Origin of Species (1859), Lear backs one side against another in public debates sparked by evolutionary theory. His implicit engagement with the new biology becomes evident in close attention to the drawings, which are essential components of Lear's innovative hybridization of visual and literary artforms.
{"title":"Evolution, Two Darwins, and the Gestalt Imagining of Edward Lear","authors":"Thomas Dilworth, Michael Crawford","doi":"10.2979/vic.2023.a911109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/vic.2023.a911109","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Edward Lear was in the vanguard of cultural assimilation of evolutionary theory. In what amounts to a gestalt relationship, some of his published \"nonsense\" figures against, and largely derives its meaning from, innovation in the natural sciences. Certain of his works, some not previously interpreted, are specific in their engagement with evolutionists, including Erasmus and Charles Darwin, Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, and Robert Grant. Before and after the appearance of On the Origin of Species (1859), Lear backs one side against another in public debates sparked by evolutionary theory. His implicit engagement with the new biology becomes evident in close attention to the drawings, which are essential components of Lear's innovative hybridization of visual and literary artforms.","PeriodicalId":45845,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN STUDIES","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135448361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.2979/vic.2023.a911133
Reviewed by: Sounding Feminine: Women's Voices in British Musical Culture, 1780–1850 by David Kennerley Alisa Clapp-Itnyre (bio) Sounding Feminine: Women's Voices in British Musical Culture, 1780–1850, by David Kennerley; pp. xiv + 220. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2020, $82.00. Part of Oxford's New Cultural History of Music series, David Kennerley's Sounding Feminine: Women's Voices in British Musical Culture, 1780–1850 is a welcome contribution to a series that includes studies on the music of France, Russia, Germany, and so on. British music, and that performed by women, is an especially vital field of study to which many of us over the last thirty years have contributed, answering the call by Nicholas Temperley in his formative 1989 book, The Lost Chord: Essays on Victorian Music, who writes: "Anyone who has studied Victorian history or literature is likely to be well aware of the presence of music, for it played a prominent part in Victorian life. Yet music has played little part in Victorian studies" ([Indiana University Press], 1). Kennerley's own important contribution is from a historian's perspective; his thorough investment in the archives of conduct literature, letters, diaries, and musical press brings a rich engagement with women's music often from new, intimately personal perspectives. As he writes, "[o]ne aim of this book, then, is to pursue these newly emerging links and cross-currents between public and private, professional and amateur worlds, and to do so as part of a wider rethinking of the categories scholars have applied to British musical life, especially in relation to gender" (12). Voice and sound are central foci as he argues that "the sound of the voice is always a product of a profound encounter between the body's physical structures and cultural norms" (3). Chapter 1 focuses on conduct literature that discouraged not only public performances by amateur women singers, but also immodest singing within the home. Chapter 2 considers a vast array of diary entries and personal letters, both of singers and listeners, to suggest, not surprisingly, that class and religious views shaped how one heard female voices. Chapter 3 considers attitudes of musical critics by focusing closely on conflicting reviews of three professional singers: Catherine Stephens, Eliza Vestris, and Giuditta [End Page 352] Pasta. Chapter 4 focuses exclusively on an upper-middle-class, amateur singer named Dorothea Solly. Kennerley uses extensive family papers to examine attitudes held by Solly, and those directed toward her, about singing and life. Chapter 5 returns to examining a wider grouping of women, now from personal papers such as Adelaide Kemble's letters, Clara Novello's singing adaptations (as read through reviews about her), and Marianne Lincoln's own tour diary. Kennerley shows anxieties and battles each experienced in their careers. Kennerley's timeline for the book, 1780 to 1850, is intentional and ends with the hope-fill
《女性化的声音:1780-1850年英国音乐文化中的女性之声》作者:大卫·肯纳利页14 + 220。牛津和纽约:牛津大学出版社,2020年,82.00美元。作为牛津大学新文化音乐史系列的一部分,大卫·肯纳利的《女性化:英国音乐文化中的女性声音,1780-1850》是对包括法国、俄罗斯、德国等音乐研究在内的一系列研究的一个受欢迎的贡献。英国音乐,以及女性演奏的音乐,是一个特别重要的研究领域,在过去的三十年里,我们中的许多人都做出了贡献,响应尼古拉斯·坦波利(Nicholas Temperley)在他1989年的著作《失落的和弦:维多利亚时代音乐随笔》(the Lost Chord: Essays on Victorian music)的号召,他写道:“任何研究过维多利亚时代历史或文学的人都可能很清楚音乐的存在,因为它在维多利亚时代的生活中发挥了重要作用。”然而,音乐在维多利亚时代的研究中几乎没有扮演什么角色”([印第安纳大学出版社],1)。肯纳利自己的重要贡献是从历史学家的角度;他对行为文学、信件、日记和音乐新闻的档案进行了彻底的投资,从新的、亲密的个人角度对女性音乐进行了丰富的研究。正如他所写的,“这本书的目的之一就是追求这些新兴的联系和公共与私人、专业与业余世界之间的交叉潮流,并以此作为对学者们应用于英国音乐生活的类别进行更广泛反思的一部分,特别是与性别有关的类别”(12)。声音和声音是中心焦点,因为他认为“声音的声音总是身体的物理结构和文化规范之间深刻相遇的产物”(3)。第1章着重于行为文学,这些文学不仅不鼓励业余女歌手的公开表演,而且不鼓励在家里唱歌。第二章考虑了大量的日记条目和私人信件,包括歌手和听众,毫不奇怪,阶级和宗教观点塑造了一个人如何听到女性的声音。第三章通过密切关注对三位专业歌手:凯瑟琳·斯蒂芬斯、伊丽莎·维斯特里斯和朱蒂塔的相互冲突的评论来考虑音乐评论家的态度。第四章专门讲述了一位名叫多萝西娅·索利的中上层业余歌手。肯纳利使用大量的家庭文件来研究索利对歌唱和生活的态度,以及那些对她的态度。第五章回到更广泛的女性群体,现在从个人文件,如阿德莱德·肯布尔的信件,克拉拉·诺韦洛的歌唱改编(通过对她的评论阅读),以及玛丽安·林肯自己的旅行日记。肯纳利展示了每个人在职业生涯中经历的焦虑和斗争。肯纳利为这本书设定的时间线,从1780年到1850年,是有意为之的,并以1854年克拉拉·诺维洛在水晶宫举行的充满希望的音乐会结束,这是“一种新型女性体现的时刻……表明19世纪中期观众接受英国女性音乐艺术家声音的成熟——富有表现力、情感丰富、充满力量”(185-86)。肯纳利研究的最大优势在于他对大量档案资料的研究。除了大量已出版的当代资料外,他还从英国各地的图书馆和档案馆收集并探索了未发表的手稿、论文、日记、信件和通信。他对当代报刊的阅读也同样详尽。如上所示,他将这些材料按类型组织成有用的章节:音乐女性的行为文学、生活写作和评论。读者会发现他的最后两章特别值得一读,因为它们利用了所有的流派,以及肯纳利对社会历史的娴熟理解,以非常专注、引人入胜和个人化的方式阐述了一位业余女音乐家(索利)和三位专业歌手,这是前几章有时所缺乏的。他的标题巧妙地突出了他的移情结论的主题:“因此,对于这些音乐女性来说,听起来女性化的挑战是一个持久的挑战,面对着观众对女性可能发出的声音的种类的分歧”(190)。如果我有预订的话…
{"title":"Sounding Feminine: Women's Voices in British Musical Culture, 1780–1850 by David Kennerley (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.2979/vic.2023.a911133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/vic.2023.a911133","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Sounding Feminine: Women's Voices in British Musical Culture, 1780–1850 by David Kennerley Alisa Clapp-Itnyre (bio) Sounding Feminine: Women's Voices in British Musical Culture, 1780–1850, by David Kennerley; pp. xiv + 220. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2020, $82.00. Part of Oxford's New Cultural History of Music series, David Kennerley's Sounding Feminine: Women's Voices in British Musical Culture, 1780–1850 is a welcome contribution to a series that includes studies on the music of France, Russia, Germany, and so on. British music, and that performed by women, is an especially vital field of study to which many of us over the last thirty years have contributed, answering the call by Nicholas Temperley in his formative 1989 book, The Lost Chord: Essays on Victorian Music, who writes: \"Anyone who has studied Victorian history or literature is likely to be well aware of the presence of music, for it played a prominent part in Victorian life. Yet music has played little part in Victorian studies\" ([Indiana University Press], 1). Kennerley's own important contribution is from a historian's perspective; his thorough investment in the archives of conduct literature, letters, diaries, and musical press brings a rich engagement with women's music often from new, intimately personal perspectives. As he writes, \"[o]ne aim of this book, then, is to pursue these newly emerging links and cross-currents between public and private, professional and amateur worlds, and to do so as part of a wider rethinking of the categories scholars have applied to British musical life, especially in relation to gender\" (12). Voice and sound are central foci as he argues that \"the sound of the voice is always a product of a profound encounter between the body's physical structures and cultural norms\" (3). Chapter 1 focuses on conduct literature that discouraged not only public performances by amateur women singers, but also immodest singing within the home. Chapter 2 considers a vast array of diary entries and personal letters, both of singers and listeners, to suggest, not surprisingly, that class and religious views shaped how one heard female voices. Chapter 3 considers attitudes of musical critics by focusing closely on conflicting reviews of three professional singers: Catherine Stephens, Eliza Vestris, and Giuditta [End Page 352] Pasta. Chapter 4 focuses exclusively on an upper-middle-class, amateur singer named Dorothea Solly. Kennerley uses extensive family papers to examine attitudes held by Solly, and those directed toward her, about singing and life. Chapter 5 returns to examining a wider grouping of women, now from personal papers such as Adelaide Kemble's letters, Clara Novello's singing adaptations (as read through reviews about her), and Marianne Lincoln's own tour diary. Kennerley shows anxieties and battles each experienced in their careers. Kennerley's timeline for the book, 1780 to 1850, is intentional and ends with the hope-fill","PeriodicalId":45845,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN STUDIES","volume":"2016 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135448349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.2979/vic.2023.a911127
Reviewed by: Oscar Wilde and the Radical Politics of the Fin de Siècle by Deaglán Ó Donghaile, and: Wilde Between the Sheets: Oscar Wilde, Mail Bondage, and "De Profundis" by David Walton Sos Eltis (bio) Oscar Wilde and the Radical Politics of the Fin de Siècle, by Deaglán Ó Donghaile; pp. x + 250. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020, $110.00, $29.95 paper, $110.00 ebook. Wilde Between the Sheets: Oscar Wilde, Mail Bondage, and "De Profundis", by David Walton; pp. x + 251. Lanham and London: Lexington Books, 2021, $111.00, $45.00 ebook. Since the 1980s Oscar Wilde has undergone a critical transformation from a superficial wit whose life merited more attention than his work to a politically engaged, provocative, and influential thinker, and two new books—Deaglán Ó Donghaile's Oscar Wilde and the Radical Politics of the Fin de Siècle and David Walton's Wilde Between the Sheets: Oscar Wilde, Mail Bondage, and "De Profundis"—offer valuable and notably different contributions to this ever-growing body of scholarship. Wilde's politics—like every other aspect of his writings—have long been the subject of fierce debate, and Ó Donghaile offers one of the boldest readings to date. He argues that Wilde was a committed and consistent radical progressive, recognized as such by a range of contemporary anarchist and socialist thinkers and activists. Tracing Wilde's critique of capitalism and colonialism from his earliest book reviews through to his final letters from prison, this study brings fresh information and perspectives to bear. Ó Donghaile has a deep and detailed grasp on the Irish context and uses it with great effect in his analysis of Wilde's early play Vera; or, The Nihilists (1883). The play, he argues, was a thinly veiled depiction of British state coercion in Ireland with its engineered mass deaths, imposition of martial law, and suppression of the peasantry, which should be read as a reflection of the Irish Famine of the 1840s and 50s and Land War of the 1880s rather than the depiction of Czarist Russia it purports to be. Detailed and illuminating, Ó Donghaile's interpretation is, however, partial, steering around the play's hesitancies and ambiguities. If the Nihilists are to be read as Fenians, what does their ready embrace of the cynical political operator Prince Paul signify? And [End Page 339] what does it imply when their revolutionary violence exacerbates the Czar's paranoia and leads to further oppression? Consistently informative and often provocative, this study is, however, tactically selective, eliding the elements of Wilde's writings that challenge or complicate its vision of the writer as a committed collectivist anarchist. A chapter on Wilde's fairy tales as a fierce condemnation of imperialist consumption—the environmental damage, colonial exploitation, and cruelty that underpin modern capitalism—centers on attentive close readings of "The Happy Prince" (1888), "The Selfish Giant" (1888), and "The Young King" (1891). Wild
书评:《奥斯卡·王尔德与法兰西之鳍的激进政治》(Deaglán Ó Donghaile)、《床上的王尔德:奥斯卡·王尔德、邮件奴役和大卫·沃尔顿的《深度》(de Profundis)》(Sos Eltis)(传记)《奥斯卡·王尔德与法兰西之鳍的激进政治》(Deaglán Ó Donghaile);Pp. x + 250。爱丁堡:爱丁堡大学出版社,2020年,$110.00,纸质书$29.95,电子书$110.00。《被窝里的王尔德:奥斯卡·王尔德、邮件奴役和《深屋》,大卫·沃尔顿著;页x + 251。兰哈姆和伦敦:列克星敦图书,2021年,$ 1111.00,电子书$45.00。自20世纪80年代以来,奥斯卡·王尔德经历了一个重要的转变,从一个肤浅的机智,他的生活比他的作品更值得关注,到一个政治参与,具有煽动性和影响力的思想家,而两本新的books-Deaglán Ó东海勒的奥斯卡·王尔德和激进的政治,以及大卫·沃尔顿的王尔德在床单之间:奥斯卡·王尔德,邮件束缚,和“深度”——为这个不断增长的学术机构提供了宝贵的和显著不同的贡献。王尔德的政治——就像他作品的其他方面一样——长期以来一直是激烈辩论的主题,Ó Donghaile提供了迄今为止最大胆的阅读之一。他认为王尔德是一个坚定而一贯的激进进步主义者,被当代一系列无政府主义和社会主义思想家和活动家所认可。追溯王尔德对资本主义和殖民主义的批判,从他最早的书评到他在狱中的最后一封信,本研究带来了新的信息和视角。Ó东海勒对爱尔兰语境有深入细致的把握,并在分析王尔德早期戏剧《薇拉》时发挥了巨大的作用;或者《虚无主义者》(1883)。他认为,这部戏剧是对英国政府在爱尔兰的强制统治的一种几乎不加掩饰的描述,包括精心策划的大规模死亡、强制实施戒严法和对农民的镇压,这应该被解读为对19世纪40年代和50年代爱尔兰饥荒和19世纪80年代土地战争的反映,而不是它所声称的对沙皇俄国的描述。尽管如此,Ó东海勒的解释还是不完整的,他的解释是围绕着戏剧的犹豫和模棱两可。如果虚无主义者被解读为芬尼亚人,那么他们欣然接受愤世嫉俗的政治操纵者保罗王子(Prince Paul)意味着什么?当他们的革命暴力加剧了沙皇的偏执并导致进一步的压迫时,这意味着什么?然而,这项研究内容丰富,经常具有挑衅性,但在策略上有选择性,省略了王尔德作品中那些挑战或使其作为一个坚定的集体主义无政府主义者的作家的观点复杂化的元素。王尔德的童话是对帝国主义消费的强烈谴责——环境破坏、殖民剥削和现代资本主义的残酷——这一章集中在仔细阅读《快乐王子》(1888)、《自私的巨人》(1888)和《年轻的国王》(1891)上。王尔德一贯倡导无私的慷慨,然而,与这些故事同时出版的其他故事,如《忠实的朋友》(1888)和《夜莺与玫瑰》(1888),使这一主张变得相当复杂。在这两个故事中,Ó东海勒忽略了naïve,主角们毫无意义地为不值得的接受者牺牲了自己的生命。Ó东海勒同样把《多里安·格雷的画像》(1891)作为对资本主义唯物主义的批判,把多里安作为最终的现代购物者,被他不受控制的消费主义所腐化。小说对奢侈品和艺术品的大量分类揭示了物质主义的空虚,以及支撑它的暴力和痛苦——这种解释没有提到王尔德选择的风格,即奢华的帕特式散文,来描绘这些艺术作品,并对它们的美流连不去。对《社会主义下的人的灵魂》(1891年)的详细欣赏概述了王尔德对市场价值、功利主义和制度权威的拒绝,这些都是贬低个人和艺术表达的阻碍力量。对王尔德挑衅性地拒绝将无私或公共本能作为社会主义理想的基础感到不安,Ó Donghaile试图将他所认为的王尔德的“唯美主义”(没有参考古stave Flaubert, th ophile Gautier, Walter Pater, William Morris或任何其他倡导者或理论家)与无政府主义者Peter Kropotkin的互惠主义和他对……
{"title":"Oscar Wilde and the Radical Politics of the Fin de Siècle by Deaglán Ó Donghaile, and: Wilde Between the Sheets: Oscar Wilde, Mail Bondage, and \"De Profundis\" by David Walton (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.2979/vic.2023.a911127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/vic.2023.a911127","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Oscar Wilde and the Radical Politics of the Fin de Siècle by Deaglán Ó Donghaile, and: Wilde Between the Sheets: Oscar Wilde, Mail Bondage, and \"De Profundis\" by David Walton Sos Eltis (bio) Oscar Wilde and the Radical Politics of the Fin de Siècle, by Deaglán Ó Donghaile; pp. x + 250. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020, $110.00, $29.95 paper, $110.00 ebook. Wilde Between the Sheets: Oscar Wilde, Mail Bondage, and \"De Profundis\", by David Walton; pp. x + 251. Lanham and London: Lexington Books, 2021, $111.00, $45.00 ebook. Since the 1980s Oscar Wilde has undergone a critical transformation from a superficial wit whose life merited more attention than his work to a politically engaged, provocative, and influential thinker, and two new books—Deaglán Ó Donghaile's Oscar Wilde and the Radical Politics of the Fin de Siècle and David Walton's Wilde Between the Sheets: Oscar Wilde, Mail Bondage, and \"De Profundis\"—offer valuable and notably different contributions to this ever-growing body of scholarship. Wilde's politics—like every other aspect of his writings—have long been the subject of fierce debate, and Ó Donghaile offers one of the boldest readings to date. He argues that Wilde was a committed and consistent radical progressive, recognized as such by a range of contemporary anarchist and socialist thinkers and activists. Tracing Wilde's critique of capitalism and colonialism from his earliest book reviews through to his final letters from prison, this study brings fresh information and perspectives to bear. Ó Donghaile has a deep and detailed grasp on the Irish context and uses it with great effect in his analysis of Wilde's early play Vera; or, The Nihilists (1883). The play, he argues, was a thinly veiled depiction of British state coercion in Ireland with its engineered mass deaths, imposition of martial law, and suppression of the peasantry, which should be read as a reflection of the Irish Famine of the 1840s and 50s and Land War of the 1880s rather than the depiction of Czarist Russia it purports to be. Detailed and illuminating, Ó Donghaile's interpretation is, however, partial, steering around the play's hesitancies and ambiguities. If the Nihilists are to be read as Fenians, what does their ready embrace of the cynical political operator Prince Paul signify? And [End Page 339] what does it imply when their revolutionary violence exacerbates the Czar's paranoia and leads to further oppression? Consistently informative and often provocative, this study is, however, tactically selective, eliding the elements of Wilde's writings that challenge or complicate its vision of the writer as a committed collectivist anarchist. A chapter on Wilde's fairy tales as a fierce condemnation of imperialist consumption—the environmental damage, colonial exploitation, and cruelty that underpin modern capitalism—centers on attentive close readings of \"The Happy Prince\" (1888), \"The Selfish Giant\" (1888), and \"The Young King\" (1891). Wild","PeriodicalId":45845,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN STUDIES","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135448338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.2979/vic.2023.a911134
Reviewed by: The Aesthetics of Senescence: Aging, Population, and the Nineteenth-Century British Novel by Andrea Charise, and: Aging, Duration, and the English Novel: Growing Old from Dickens to Woolf by Jacob Jewusiak David McAllister (bio) The Aesthetics of Senescence: Aging, Population, and the Nineteenth-Century British Novel, by Andrea Charise; pp. xlv + 194. Albany: SUNY Press, 2020, $95.00, $34.95 paper. Aging, Duration, and the English Novel: Growing Old from Dickens to Woolf, by Jacob Jewusiak; pp. xi + 202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020, £75.00, $108.00, $29.99, $29.99 ebook. The nineteenth century has long been fertile ground for scholars in the field of literary age studies. The disruption of traditional communities of care by urbanization, the emergence of an economic model that valorized the youthful body, and the development of medical and scientific disciplines that focused on old age all mark this period as one in which discourses of age and aging were being transformed. Two new books on the subject indicate a field that remains in rude health, with both Andrea Charise's The Aesthetics of Senescence: Aging, Population, and the Nineteenth-Century British Novel, and Jacob Jewusiak's Aging, Duration, and the English Novel: Growing Old from Dickens to Woolf offering compelling new approaches to the study of age and aging in nineteenth-century literature. Both books are substantially focused on Victorian literature and culture, though each expands its discussion of aging across period boundaries. Charise traces the influence of Romantic conceptions of age on Victorian novelists including George Eliot, George Gissing, H. Rider Haggard, and Anthony Trollope, while Jewusiak discusses a similarly canonical range of authors including Charles Dickens, Elizabeth Gaskell, Thomas Hardy, and H. G. Wells before moving forward, in his final chapter, to consider Virginia Woolf's modernist approach to aging. They share a broadly historicist and interdisciplinary approach, with Charise's work in particular drawing on an unfamiliar selection of scientific and medical texts that cast fresh light on the construction of age throughout the nineteenth century. [End Page 354] Charise identifies an "unprecedented … climate of crisis associated with growing old" in the period, which first crystallized in the 1798 dispute between William Godwin and Thomas Malthus (xix). This debate ostensibly centered on the issue of population, but as Charise points out it was also fundamentally concerned with antithetical conceptions of age and aging. She describes their dispute (in a characteristically memorable phrase) as a competition between "the imagined romance of immortality and the observed reality of dwindling food supplies" and suggests that by recasting aging as a biopolitical problem Malthus initiated a more complex understanding of aging and generationality (2). These new conceptions of age demanded (and shaped) aesthetic representation, and in ch
{"title":"The Aesthetics of Senescence: Aging, Population, and the Nineteenth-Century British Novel by Andrea Charise, and: Aging, Duration, and the English Novel: Growing Old from Dickens to Woolf by Jacob Jewusiak (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.2979/vic.2023.a911134","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/vic.2023.a911134","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: The Aesthetics of Senescence: Aging, Population, and the Nineteenth-Century British Novel by Andrea Charise, and: Aging, Duration, and the English Novel: Growing Old from Dickens to Woolf by Jacob Jewusiak David McAllister (bio) The Aesthetics of Senescence: Aging, Population, and the Nineteenth-Century British Novel, by Andrea Charise; pp. xlv + 194. Albany: SUNY Press, 2020, $95.00, $34.95 paper. Aging, Duration, and the English Novel: Growing Old from Dickens to Woolf, by Jacob Jewusiak; pp. xi + 202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020, £75.00, $108.00, $29.99, $29.99 ebook. The nineteenth century has long been fertile ground for scholars in the field of literary age studies. The disruption of traditional communities of care by urbanization, the emergence of an economic model that valorized the youthful body, and the development of medical and scientific disciplines that focused on old age all mark this period as one in which discourses of age and aging were being transformed. Two new books on the subject indicate a field that remains in rude health, with both Andrea Charise's The Aesthetics of Senescence: Aging, Population, and the Nineteenth-Century British Novel, and Jacob Jewusiak's Aging, Duration, and the English Novel: Growing Old from Dickens to Woolf offering compelling new approaches to the study of age and aging in nineteenth-century literature. Both books are substantially focused on Victorian literature and culture, though each expands its discussion of aging across period boundaries. Charise traces the influence of Romantic conceptions of age on Victorian novelists including George Eliot, George Gissing, H. Rider Haggard, and Anthony Trollope, while Jewusiak discusses a similarly canonical range of authors including Charles Dickens, Elizabeth Gaskell, Thomas Hardy, and H. G. Wells before moving forward, in his final chapter, to consider Virginia Woolf's modernist approach to aging. They share a broadly historicist and interdisciplinary approach, with Charise's work in particular drawing on an unfamiliar selection of scientific and medical texts that cast fresh light on the construction of age throughout the nineteenth century. [End Page 354] Charise identifies an \"unprecedented … climate of crisis associated with growing old\" in the period, which first crystallized in the 1798 dispute between William Godwin and Thomas Malthus (xix). This debate ostensibly centered on the issue of population, but as Charise points out it was also fundamentally concerned with antithetical conceptions of age and aging. She describes their dispute (in a characteristically memorable phrase) as a competition between \"the imagined romance of immortality and the observed reality of dwindling food supplies\" and suggests that by recasting aging as a biopolitical problem Malthus initiated a more complex understanding of aging and generationality (2). These new conceptions of age demanded (and shaped) aesthetic representation, and in ch","PeriodicalId":45845,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN STUDIES","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135448341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.2979/vic.2023.a911136
Reviewed by: Darwin's "Historical Sketch": An Examination of the 'Preface' to the Origin of Species by Curtis N. Johnson Devin Griffiths (bio) Darwin's "Historical Sketch": An Examination of the 'Preface' to the Origin of Species, by Curtis N. Johnson; pp. xxvii + 425. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019, $40.95. A big challenge in writing an entire book about any major figure is to break new ground. Take the risky course and attempt to engage their full career? Or pursue a narrower strategy, diving into a smaller and less-studied aspect of their life and work? In Darwin's "Historical Sketch": An Examination of the 'Preface' to the Origin of Species, Curtis N. Johnson takes the latter tack with a zeal that sometimes overtakes its subject. The topic is the short, just over six-page "historical sketch" that Charles Darwin added as a preface to the fourth American printing of On the Origin of Species (1859), later revised and included in subsequent editions. The historical sketch responded to a range of correspondents who contacted Darwin to point out various earlier contributors to both evolutionary theory and nascent articulations of natural selection. When, over the course of a couple of weeks and after suffering a bout of ill health, Darwin did finally draft a preface in early 1859, he made a quick job of it, often relying on second-hand descriptions to give a sketch of each contributor and their relative priority. Darwin's "Historical Sketch" revises that hasty account. Over the course of seventeen chapters, Johnson explores the thirty-five figures cited in various versions of the "Preface." Drawing together materials from the Darwin Correspondence Project, digitizations of Darwin's manuscripts and books, and Mario Di Gregorio and N. W. Gill's careful study, Charles Darwin's Marginalia (1990), Johnson pieces together Darwin's engagement with previous writers. It will prove extremely useful to scholars who want to decode the "Preface." As Johnson explains, Darwin's references are sometimes vague, and many of the figures cited are obscure, their specific contributions unclear. About each previous writer, Johnson asks the same series of questions: How did Darwin encounter this writer? What did he read or know about them? And why did he cite them in this way? At times, Johnson's passion for expounding these mysteries becomes overzealous. Each section works laboriously through all possible answers before finally landing on solutions that often seem self-evident. At other times, Johnson spends disproportionate time speculating on Darwin's motives. Take the treatment of Baden Powell, whose work, Johnson argues, "may have deserved lengthier treatment," and for which, he suggests, Darwin "may have felt some embarrassment" (6, 7). This contrasts with the following observation that Powell's work "was certainly no forerunner of Darwin in terms of the details of his theory" and by Powell's "own admission … [was] not offering new ideas" (9). Why, then, i
达尔文的“历史素描”:对柯蒂斯·n·约翰逊《物种起源》“序言”的考察德文·格里菲斯(生物)达尔文的“历史素描”:对柯蒂斯·n·约翰逊《物种起源》“序言”的考察;第27页+ 425页。纽约:牛津大学出版社,2019年,40.95美元。要写一本关于任何重要人物的整本书,最大的挑战是要有新的突破。选择冒险的路线,尝试全身心投入到他们的职业生涯中去?还是采取更狭隘的策略,深入研究他们生活和工作中更小、更少研究的方面?在《达尔文的“历史概要”:对《物种起源》序言的考察》一书中,柯蒂斯·n·约翰逊以一种有时超越主题的热情,采取了后者的策略。主题是查尔斯·达尔文(Charles Darwin)在1859年美国第四版《物种起源》(On The Origin of Species)的序言中添加的简短的、只有六页多的“历史概要”,后来被修订并收录在后续版本中。这篇历史小品回应了一系列联系达尔文的记者,这些记者指出了进化论和自然选择的新生表达的各种早期贡献者。在经历了几周的病痛之后,达尔文终于在1859年初起草了一份序言,他做得很快,经常依靠二手描述来描绘每个贡献者及其相对优先级。达尔文的《历史概要》修正了这个草率的描述。在17章的课程中,约翰逊探索了在不同版本的“序言”中引用的35个人物。约翰逊收集了达尔文通信项目的资料,达尔文手稿和书籍的数字化,以及马里奥·迪·格雷戈里奥和n·w·吉尔的仔细研究,查尔斯·达尔文的旁注(1990),将达尔文与以前作家的接触拼凑在一起。对于想要解读《前言》的学者来说,这将是非常有用的。正如约翰逊解释的那样,达尔文的参考文献有时是模糊的,许多引用的数字是模糊的,他们的具体贡献不清楚。对于之前的每一位作家,约翰逊都问了同样的一系列问题:达尔文是如何遇到这位作家的?他读过或知道关于他们的什么?他为什么这样引用它们呢?有时,约翰逊对解释这些谜团的热情变得过于热情。每个部分都费力地研究了所有可能的答案,最后找到了通常看起来不言自明的解决方案。其他时候,约翰逊花了过多的时间猜测达尔文的动机。以贝登·鲍威尔为例,约翰逊认为,他的作品“可能应该得到更长时间的处理”。因此,他认为,达尔文“可能感到有些尴尬”(6,7)。这与下面的观察形成对比,即鲍威尔的工作“在理论的细节方面肯定不是达尔文的先驱”,鲍威尔“自己承认……没有提供新的思想”(9)。那么,为什么鲍威尔在草图中简短而似乎适当的承认在约翰逊的研究中得到了如此广泛的关注?我最近听到了一个采访,在采访中,作家n·k·杰米辛(N. K. Jemisin)分享了她给那些努力构建自己想象世界的作家的建议:不要让你的读者像你一样受苦。这对我们所有人都是好建议。约翰逊对达尔文“素描”的非传统研究方法,除了追踪他与更多次要人物的接触之外,还有一些有趣的特点。除了达尔文本人,所有35个主题都有自己的素描肖像,改编自其他绘画和照片。这些插图为研究增添了温暖,但也有一些很奇怪。威廉·赫伯特,19世纪40年代的曼彻斯特院长,被描绘成留着伊丽莎白时代的皱领和胡须,他的形象来自彭布罗克第三任伯爵(也叫威廉·赫伯特)的肖像,他是詹姆斯一世领导下彭布罗克学院的创始人。封面上显眼的达尔文本人肖像,是达尔文不喜欢的一张19世纪50年代中期的照片。(在给约翰·胡克的一封信中,达尔文观察到“如果我真的有这么糟糕的表达……我怎么能有一个朋友是令人惊讶的”[达尔文qtd]。在约翰·凡·怀赫的《查尔斯的照片……
{"title":"Darwin's \"Historical Sketch\": An Examination of the 'Preface' to the Origin of Species by Curtis N. Johnson (review)","authors":"","doi":"10.2979/vic.2023.a911136","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2979/vic.2023.a911136","url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Darwin's \"Historical Sketch\": An Examination of the 'Preface' to the Origin of Species by Curtis N. Johnson Devin Griffiths (bio) Darwin's \"Historical Sketch\": An Examination of the 'Preface' to the Origin of Species, by Curtis N. Johnson; pp. xxvii + 425. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019, $40.95. A big challenge in writing an entire book about any major figure is to break new ground. Take the risky course and attempt to engage their full career? Or pursue a narrower strategy, diving into a smaller and less-studied aspect of their life and work? In Darwin's \"Historical Sketch\": An Examination of the 'Preface' to the Origin of Species, Curtis N. Johnson takes the latter tack with a zeal that sometimes overtakes its subject. The topic is the short, just over six-page \"historical sketch\" that Charles Darwin added as a preface to the fourth American printing of On the Origin of Species (1859), later revised and included in subsequent editions. The historical sketch responded to a range of correspondents who contacted Darwin to point out various earlier contributors to both evolutionary theory and nascent articulations of natural selection. When, over the course of a couple of weeks and after suffering a bout of ill health, Darwin did finally draft a preface in early 1859, he made a quick job of it, often relying on second-hand descriptions to give a sketch of each contributor and their relative priority. Darwin's \"Historical Sketch\" revises that hasty account. Over the course of seventeen chapters, Johnson explores the thirty-five figures cited in various versions of the \"Preface.\" Drawing together materials from the Darwin Correspondence Project, digitizations of Darwin's manuscripts and books, and Mario Di Gregorio and N. W. Gill's careful study, Charles Darwin's Marginalia (1990), Johnson pieces together Darwin's engagement with previous writers. It will prove extremely useful to scholars who want to decode the \"Preface.\" As Johnson explains, Darwin's references are sometimes vague, and many of the figures cited are obscure, their specific contributions unclear. About each previous writer, Johnson asks the same series of questions: How did Darwin encounter this writer? What did he read or know about them? And why did he cite them in this way? At times, Johnson's passion for expounding these mysteries becomes overzealous. Each section works laboriously through all possible answers before finally landing on solutions that often seem self-evident. At other times, Johnson spends disproportionate time speculating on Darwin's motives. Take the treatment of Baden Powell, whose work, Johnson argues, \"may have deserved lengthier treatment,\" and for which, he suggests, Darwin \"may have felt some embarrassment\" (6, 7). This contrasts with the following observation that Powell's work \"was certainly no forerunner of Darwin in terms of the details of his theory\" and by Powell's \"own admission … [was] not offering new ideas\" (9). Why, then, i","PeriodicalId":45845,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN STUDIES","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135448343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}