首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Corporate Real Estate最新文献

英文 中文
Identifying interior design strategies for healthy workplaces – a literature review 确定健康工作场所的室内设计策略-文献综述
IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2021-11-30 DOI: 10.1108/jcre-12-2020-0068
Susanne Colenberg, Tuuli Jylhä
PurposeIt is widely recognized that interior office space can affect health in several ways. Strategic and evidence-based design, including explicit design objectives, well-chosen design solutions and evaluation of results, aid realization of desired health effects. Therefore, this paper aims to identify possibly effective interior design strategies and accompanying design solutions and to provide examples of effectiveness measures.Design/methodology/approachA literature sample of 59 peer-reviewed papers published across disciplines was used to collect examples of workplace design features that have positively influenced workers’ well-being. The papers were grouped by their health objective and design scope successively and their theoretical assumptions, measures and findings were analyzed.FindingsFour main workplace design strategies were identified. Design for comfort aims at reducing or preventing health complaints, discomfort and stress, following a pathogenic approach. It has the longest tradition and is the most frequently addressed in the included papers. The other three take a salutogenic approach, promoting health by increasing resources for coping with demands through positive design. Design for restoration supports physical and mental recovery through connections with nature. Design for social well-being facilitates social cohesion and feelings of belonging. Design for healthy behavior aims at nudging physical activity in the workplace.Originality/valueBy drawing complementary perspectives and offering examples of design solutions and effectiveness measures, this paper encourages workplace designers, managers and researchers to take a transdisciplinary and evidence-based approach to healthy workplaces. It also serves as a starting point for future empirical research.
人们普遍认为室内办公空间会在几个方面影响健康。战略性和循证设计,包括明确的设计目标、精心选择的设计解决方案和结果评估,有助于实现预期的健康效果。因此,本文旨在确定可能有效的室内设计策略和伴随的设计解决方案,并提供有效措施的例子。设计/方法/方法采用了59篇跨学科发表的同行评议论文的文献样本,以收集对员工幸福感产生积极影响的工作场所设计特征的例子。按健康目标和设计范围对论文进行分组,分析论文的理论假设、措施和研究结果。研究结果确定了四种主要的工作场所设计策略。舒适设计的目的是减少或预防健康投诉,不适和压力,遵循致病的方法。它有着最悠久的传统,也是收录论文中最常提到的。其他三个采取了有益健康的方法,通过积极的设计增加资源来应对需求,从而促进健康。修复设计通过与自然的联系来支持身体和精神的恢复。社会福利设计促进社会凝聚力和归属感。健康行为的设计旨在促进工作场所的身体活动。原创性/价值通过绘制互补的观点并提供设计解决方案和有效性措施的示例,本文鼓励工作场所设计师、管理人员和研究人员采取跨学科和基于证据的方法来实现健康的工作场所。这也为未来的实证研究提供了一个起点。
{"title":"Identifying interior design strategies for healthy workplaces – a literature review","authors":"Susanne Colenberg, Tuuli Jylhä","doi":"10.1108/jcre-12-2020-0068","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-12-2020-0068","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000It is widely recognized that interior office space can affect health in several ways. Strategic and evidence-based design, including explicit design objectives, well-chosen design solutions and evaluation of results, aid realization of desired health effects. Therefore, this paper aims to identify possibly effective interior design strategies and accompanying design solutions and to provide examples of effectiveness measures.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000A literature sample of 59 peer-reviewed papers published across disciplines was used to collect examples of workplace design features that have positively influenced workers’ well-being. The papers were grouped by their health objective and design scope successively and their theoretical assumptions, measures and findings were analyzed.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000Four main workplace design strategies were identified. Design for comfort aims at reducing or preventing health complaints, discomfort and stress, following a pathogenic approach. It has the longest tradition and is the most frequently addressed in the included papers. The other three take a salutogenic approach, promoting health by increasing resources for coping with demands through positive design. Design for restoration supports physical and mental recovery through connections with nature. Design for social well-being facilitates social cohesion and feelings of belonging. Design for healthy behavior aims at nudging physical activity in the workplace.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000By drawing complementary perspectives and offering examples of design solutions and effectiveness measures, this paper encourages workplace designers, managers and researchers to take a transdisciplinary and evidence-based approach to healthy workplaces. It also serves as a starting point for future empirical research.\u0000","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45005513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
The impact of healthy workplaces on employee satisfaction, productivity and costs 健康工作场所对员工满意度、生产力和成本的影响
IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2021-11-25 DOI: 10.1108/jcre-03-2021-0012
Theo van der Voordt, P. Jensen
PurposeThis paper aims to explore the added value of healthy workplaces for employees and organizations, in particular regarding employee satisfaction, labour productivity and facility cost.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is based on a narrative review of journal papers and other sources covering the fields of building research, corporate real estate management, facilities management, environmental psychology and ergonomics.FindingsThe review supports the assumption of positive impacts of appropriate building characteristics on health, satisfaction and productivity. Correlations between these impacts are still underexposed. Data on cost and economic benefits of healthy workplace characteristics is limited, and mainly regard reduced sickness absence. The discussed papers indicate that investing in healthy work environments is cost-effective.Originality/valueThe findings contribute to a better understanding of the complex relationships between physical characteristics of the environment and health, satisfaction, productivity and costs. These insights can be used to assess work environments on these topics, and to identify appropriate interventions in value-adding management of buildings and facilities.
目的本文旨在探讨健康工作场所对员工和组织的附加值,特别是在员工满意度、劳动生产率和设施成本方面。设计/方法论/方法该论文基于对期刊论文和其他来源的叙述性综述,涵盖建筑研究、企业房地产管理、设施管理、环境心理学和人体工程学领域。发现该综述支持适当的建筑特征对健康、满意度和生产力产生积极影响的假设。这些影响之间的相关性仍然暴露不足。关于健康工作场所特征的成本和经济效益的数据有限,主要涉及减少病假。所讨论的论文表明,投资于健康的工作环境是有成本效益的。原创性/价值这些发现有助于更好地理解环境的物理特征与健康、满意度、生产力和成本之间的复杂关系。这些见解可用于评估这些主题的工作环境,并确定建筑和设施增值管理的适当干预措施。
{"title":"The impact of healthy workplaces on employee satisfaction, productivity and costs","authors":"Theo van der Voordt, P. Jensen","doi":"10.1108/jcre-03-2021-0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-03-2021-0012","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000This paper aims to explore the added value of healthy workplaces for employees and organizations, in particular regarding employee satisfaction, labour productivity and facility cost.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000The paper is based on a narrative review of journal papers and other sources covering the fields of building research, corporate real estate management, facilities management, environmental psychology and ergonomics.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The review supports the assumption of positive impacts of appropriate building characteristics on health, satisfaction and productivity. Correlations between these impacts are still underexposed. Data on cost and economic benefits of healthy workplace characteristics is limited, and mainly regard reduced sickness absence. The discussed papers indicate that investing in healthy work environments is cost-effective.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000The findings contribute to a better understanding of the complex relationships between physical characteristics of the environment and health, satisfaction, productivity and costs. These insights can be used to assess work environments on these topics, and to identify appropriate interventions in value-adding management of buildings and facilities.\u0000","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41562462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Coworking space practices: assessing space users’ preferences and challenges in Ibadan, Nigeria 共同工作空间做法:评估尼日利亚伊巴丹空间用户的偏好和挑战
IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2021-10-25 DOI: 10.1108/jcre-03-2021-0011
T. O. Ayodele, O. T. Ogunbayo, K. Kajimo-Shakantu, T. Babatunde
PurposeCoworking spaces are recent developments in commercial property investment portfolio in Nigeria. Given the user-centered nature of coworking space practices, the purpose of this paper is to examine the factors influencing users’ preference for coworking, and the challenges associated with the use of coworking spaces in the emerging Nigeria property market.Design/methodology/approachThis study used a quantitative research approach. This study sampled nine (9) traditional coworking spaces in Ibadan property market, from which 15 coworking space users were randomly selected in each of the coworking hubs. From a total of 135 respondents, only 45 (33.33%) questionnaires were retrieved and found suitable for analysis. The data collected were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.FindingsThe results showed that economic and social motivators were significant drivers influencing coworkers’ decision to cowork. Personal factors were the least rated. Also, top-rated features/facilities that users prefer in the workstations include a neat environment and conveniences, uninterrupted power supply, serenity of the neighborhood and ease of signing up. The findings also showed that the challenges being faced by the users were predominantly about disturbance/noise from guests and/or other users, lack of privacy, poor internet connectivity, power failure and inability to personalize workspace (in decreasing order).Practical implicationsThis study has implications for investors and users of coworking spaces in comparable developing markets. Also, the study will influence strategies and decisions of private firms/companies, as it relates to the work pattern of their employees.Originality/valueThis paper is relevant given the emergent behavioral changes, necessitated by the changing work practices. This compels the need for a reevaluation of the preferences and challenges associated with coworking spaces, especially as it relates to the users of flexible office spaces in emerging economies.
目的共同工作空间是尼日利亚商业地产投资组合的最新发展。鉴于共享办公空间实践以用户为中心的性质,本文的目的是研究影响用户共享办公偏好的因素,以及在新兴的尼日利亚房地产市场中使用共享办公空间的挑战。设计/方法论/方法本研究采用了定量研究方法。这项研究对伊巴丹房地产市场的九(9)个传统共享办公空间进行了抽样,从中随机选择了每个共享办公中心的15名共享办公空间用户。在总共135名受访者中,只有45份(33.33%)问卷被检索出来并被认为适合分析。使用描述性和推断统计学对收集到的数据进行分析。研究结果表明,经济和社会激励因素是影响同事共同工作决定的重要驱动因素。个人因素评分最低。此外,用户更喜欢工作站的顶级功能/设施包括整洁的环境和便利、不间断的电源、宁静的社区和易于注册。调查结果还显示,用户面临的挑战主要是来自客人和/或其他用户的干扰/噪音、缺乏隐私、互联网连接不良、电源故障和无法个性化工作空间(按降序排列)。实际意义这项研究对可比发展中市场的共同办公空间的投资者和用户具有意义。此外,这项研究将影响私营公司/公司的战略和决策,因为它与员工的工作模式有关。原创性/价值考虑到工作实践的变化所带来的突发行为变化,本文具有相关性。这就需要重新评估与共享办公空间相关的偏好和挑战,尤其是与新兴经济体灵活办公空间的用户相关的偏好。
{"title":"Coworking space practices: assessing space users’ preferences and challenges in Ibadan, Nigeria","authors":"T. O. Ayodele, O. T. Ogunbayo, K. Kajimo-Shakantu, T. Babatunde","doi":"10.1108/jcre-03-2021-0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-03-2021-0011","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000Coworking spaces are recent developments in commercial property investment portfolio in Nigeria. Given the user-centered nature of coworking space practices, the purpose of this paper is to examine the factors influencing users’ preference for coworking, and the challenges associated with the use of coworking spaces in the emerging Nigeria property market.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000This study used a quantitative research approach. This study sampled nine (9) traditional coworking spaces in Ibadan property market, from which 15 coworking space users were randomly selected in each of the coworking hubs. From a total of 135 respondents, only 45 (33.33%) questionnaires were retrieved and found suitable for analysis. The data collected were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The results showed that economic and social motivators were significant drivers influencing coworkers’ decision to cowork. Personal factors were the least rated. Also, top-rated features/facilities that users prefer in the workstations include a neat environment and conveniences, uninterrupted power supply, serenity of the neighborhood and ease of signing up. The findings also showed that the challenges being faced by the users were predominantly about disturbance/noise from guests and/or other users, lack of privacy, poor internet connectivity, power failure and inability to personalize workspace (in decreasing order).\u0000\u0000\u0000Practical implications\u0000This study has implications for investors and users of coworking spaces in comparable developing markets. Also, the study will influence strategies and decisions of private firms/companies, as it relates to the work pattern of their employees.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000This paper is relevant given the emergent behavioral changes, necessitated by the changing work practices. This compels the need for a reevaluation of the preferences and challenges associated with coworking spaces, especially as it relates to the users of flexible office spaces in emerging economies.\u0000","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41415598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corporate real estate and green building: prevalence, transparency and drivers 企业房地产和绿色建筑:普遍性、透明度和驱动因素
IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2021-10-11 DOI: 10.1108/jcre-05-2021-0016
T. Richter, Eveline Soliva, M. Haase, Isabelle Wrase
PurposeGreen building is a megatrend in corporate real estate management. This paper aims to document the prevalence of green building reporting in public firms, assess how well firms apply good practices of green building and show which firms, countries and industry sectors are particularly advanced in the application of green building technologies.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses data on green building reporting, green building scores and firm characteristics of 1,281 publicly traded firms from different industries in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries over a 5-year period. Regression analysis is used to relate the adoption of green building reporting and excellence in green building to firm characteristics.FindingsThe results indicate that there is a huge variation in green building activities and reporting in corporate real estate management across countries and industries. The study finds that firms in the financial and health-care sectors are leading in green building reporting. Environmental, social and corporate governance-oriented, profitable and large firms receive the highest green building scores.Research limitations/implicationsThe results in this paper rely on the reported but not inevitably monitored green building activities. There may also be companies that use green building technologies but do not report on them. The conclusions are largely based on correlations and do not allow for causal statements (endogenous variables).Practical implicationsThe results in this paper are crucial for practitioners in corporate real estate to benchmark their green building activities and reporting. Additionally, the paper sheds light on how information on green building is propagated in the financial market.Originality/valueThe paper looks at the drivers and barriers of green building for 25 countries and across all industry sectors (1,281 firms). In contrast to that most of the existing literature focuses on single countries and limits the analysis to companies in the real estate and construction industry. Additionally, the paper has a joint focus on publicly available green building reporting and green building scores.
绿色建筑是企业物业管理的大趋势。本文旨在记录绿色建筑报告在上市公司中的流行程度,评估公司如何应用绿色建筑的良好实践,并展示哪些公司、国家和行业部门在绿色建筑技术的应用方面特别先进。设计/方法/方法该研究使用了经济合作与发展组织成员国不同行业的1,281家上市公司在5年期间的绿色建筑报告、绿色建筑评分和公司特征数据。采用回归分析将绿色建筑报告的采用和绿色建筑的卓越性与公司特征联系起来。研究结果表明,不同国家和行业的企业房地产管理在绿色建筑活动和报告方面存在巨大差异。研究发现,金融和医疗保健行业的公司在绿色建筑报告方面处于领先地位。以环境、社会和公司治理为导向、盈利的大型企业获得了最高的绿色建筑得分。研究的局限性/意义本文的结果依赖于已报道的但并非必然监测的绿色建筑活动。也可能有一些公司使用绿色建筑技术,但没有对其进行报告。结论主要基于相关性,不允许因果陈述(内生变量)。本文的研究结果对企业房地产从业者制定绿色建筑活动和报告的基准具有重要意义。此外,本文还揭示了绿色建筑信息在金融市场中的传播方式。该报告研究了25个国家和所有行业(1,281家公司)绿色建筑的驱动因素和障碍。与此相反,大多数现有文献侧重于单个国家,并将分析限制在房地产和建筑行业的公司。此外,该论文还共同关注可公开获得的绿色建筑报告和绿色建筑评分。
{"title":"Corporate real estate and green building: prevalence, transparency and drivers","authors":"T. Richter, Eveline Soliva, M. Haase, Isabelle Wrase","doi":"10.1108/jcre-05-2021-0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-05-2021-0016","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000Green building is a megatrend in corporate real estate management. This paper aims to document the prevalence of green building reporting in public firms, assess how well firms apply good practices of green building and show which firms, countries and industry sectors are particularly advanced in the application of green building technologies.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000The study uses data on green building reporting, green building scores and firm characteristics of 1,281 publicly traded firms from different industries in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries over a 5-year period. Regression analysis is used to relate the adoption of green building reporting and excellence in green building to firm characteristics.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The results indicate that there is a huge variation in green building activities and reporting in corporate real estate management across countries and industries. The study finds that firms in the financial and health-care sectors are leading in green building reporting. Environmental, social and corporate governance-oriented, profitable and large firms receive the highest green building scores.\u0000\u0000\u0000Research limitations/implications\u0000The results in this paper rely on the reported but not inevitably monitored green building activities. There may also be companies that use green building technologies but do not report on them. The conclusions are largely based on correlations and do not allow for causal statements (endogenous variables).\u0000\u0000\u0000Practical implications\u0000The results in this paper are crucial for practitioners in corporate real estate to benchmark their green building activities and reporting. Additionally, the paper sheds light on how information on green building is propagated in the financial market.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000The paper looks at the drivers and barriers of green building for 25 countries and across all industry sectors (1,281 firms). In contrast to that most of the existing literature focuses on single countries and limits the analysis to companies in the real estate and construction industry. Additionally, the paper has a joint focus on publicly available green building reporting and green building scores.\u0000","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44806927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Switching behaviour in activity-based working environments: an exploration of the reasons and influencing factors 基于活动的工作环境中的转换行为:原因和影响因素的探讨
IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2021-10-06 DOI: 10.1108/jcre-12-2020-0072
Eunji Häne, L. Windlinger
PurposeA tendency that employees do not frequently switch between different activity settings was reported in previous studies, which are opposed to underlying assumptions of activity-based working (ABW) offices. Although ABW is increasingly becoming a standard office concept, employees’ switching behaviour has not been studied in depth. This study aims to understand employees’ switching behaviour by identifying reasons (not) to switch and various influencing factors of switching behaviour.Design/methodology/approachAn online survey was conducted across Switzerland and Belgium, and 124 respondents participated in the questionnaire. The mismatch model was developed to examine whether the misfit between either activity or preference and work environment leads to switching to another place in the office.FindingsResults show that most of the respondents switch multiple times a day, which runs counter to the previous studies. Furthermore, this study presented clear evidence that mandatory switching frequency is independent of various factors presented in the study, indicating that the distinction between mandatory and voluntary switching is valid. Besides, results identified privacy, acoustics, distraction, proximity to team/colleagues as reasons to switch and as reasons not to switch, place preference/attachment, proximity to the team were determined.Originality/valueThis study contributed to better understanding switching behaviour by defining, distinguishing switching behaviour, identifying reasons (not) to switch and influencing factors of switching frequency. In addition, this study compared the misfit between activity and environment and the misfit between preference and environment as push factors leading to switching behaviour. These findings can provide more knowledge of switching behaviour to workplace or facility management practitioners.
目的以前的研究报告了员工不经常在不同的活动环境之间切换的趋势,这与基于活动的工作(ABW)办公室的基本假设相反。尽管ABW越来越成为一个标准的办公室概念,但员工的转换行为尚未得到深入研究。本研究旨在通过识别转换的原因(不)和转换行为的各种影响因素来了解员工的转换行为。设计/方法/方法在瑞士和比利时进行了一项在线调查,124名受访者参与了问卷调查。开发不匹配模型是为了检查活动或偏好与工作环境之间的不匹配是否会导致换到办公室的另一个地方。调查结果显示,大多数受访者每天转换多次,这与之前的研究背道而驰。此外,这项研究提供了明确的证据,表明强制切换频率与研究中提出的各种因素无关,表明强制和自愿切换之间的区别是有效的。此外,研究结果表明,隐私、声学、分心、与团队/同事的接近是切换的原因,而不切换的原因是位置偏好/依恋、与团队的接近。独创性/价值本研究通过定义、区分开关行为、确定开关的原因(不)以及开关频率的影响因素,有助于更好地理解开关行为。此外,本研究比较了活动与环境之间的不匹配以及偏好与环境之间作为导致转换行为的推动因素的不匹配。这些发现可以为工作场所或设施管理从业者提供更多关于转换行为的知识。
{"title":"Switching behaviour in activity-based working environments: an exploration of the reasons and influencing factors","authors":"Eunji Häne, L. Windlinger","doi":"10.1108/jcre-12-2020-0072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-12-2020-0072","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000A tendency that employees do not frequently switch between different activity settings was reported in previous studies, which are opposed to underlying assumptions of activity-based working (ABW) offices. Although ABW is increasingly becoming a standard office concept, employees’ switching behaviour has not been studied in depth. This study aims to understand employees’ switching behaviour by identifying reasons (not) to switch and various influencing factors of switching behaviour.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000An online survey was conducted across Switzerland and Belgium, and 124 respondents participated in the questionnaire. The mismatch model was developed to examine whether the misfit between either activity or preference and work environment leads to switching to another place in the office.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000Results show that most of the respondents switch multiple times a day, which runs counter to the previous studies. Furthermore, this study presented clear evidence that mandatory switching frequency is independent of various factors presented in the study, indicating that the distinction between mandatory and voluntary switching is valid. Besides, results identified privacy, acoustics, distraction, proximity to team/colleagues as reasons to switch and as reasons not to switch, place preference/attachment, proximity to the team were determined.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000This study contributed to better understanding switching behaviour by defining, distinguishing switching behaviour, identifying reasons (not) to switch and influencing factors of switching frequency. In addition, this study compared the misfit between activity and environment and the misfit between preference and environment as push factors leading to switching behaviour. These findings can provide more knowledge of switching behaviour to workplace or facility management practitioners.\u0000","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42418581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The pricing of corporate real estate holdings on the UK capital market 英国资本市场上企业房地产资产的定价
IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2021-08-24 DOI: 10.1108/jcre-11-2020-0059
Julian Seger, K. Stoner, Andreas Pfnuer
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to find out if corporate real estate ownership is priced into the capital market performance of non-property companies in the UK. This is of particular interest because ownership still represents a significant weight on the balance sheets and is predominantly considered unfavourable due to its bulkiness and difficult revisability in the event of changes in space demand. This draws attention to the UK as one of the most important European economies that have been exposed to strong uncertainties and dynamics, for example, due to the withdrawal voting of the United Kingdom from the European Union (BREXIT).Design/methodology/approachA first look at the real estate assets reported in balance sheets provides insight into possible changes in ownership strategy. This serves as a basis for subdividing companies based on their real estate assets using a portfolio-based approach and that are then analysed using the Fama and French multi-factor model with regard to their influence on capital market returns.FindingsIn general, the share of real estate assets has fallen over the past 10 years, although coinciding with BREXIT voting, some industries such as manufacturing show a turnaround. At the same time, ownership is priced in as a factor on the capital market, which applies to a sample across industries, as well as to separately considered sectors in the manufacturing and service industries. The pricing also shows a counter-cyclical pattern.Practical implicationsCorporate real estate management should be aware of the negative influence of ownership, especially against the background of economic fluctuations. The reduction of ownership can reduce the associated cost of capital and increase company success.Originality/valuePrevious UK-related studies mostly refer to a period before the global economic crisis in 2008, and therefore, are too old to reflect a changed view on corporate real estate ownership because of new corporate environmental conditions, based on inaccurate proxies or mainly refer to the retail segment. This research gap is closed.
目的本研究的目的是了解英国非房地产公司的资本市场表现是否反映了企业房地产所有权。这一点特别令人感兴趣,因为所有权仍然在资产负债表上占很大比重,而且由于其庞大性和在空间需求发生变化时难以修改,因此主要被认为是不利的。这引起了人们对英国作为最重要的欧洲经济体之一的关注,这些经济体面临着强烈的不确定性和动态,例如,由于英国退出欧盟(BREXIT)的投票。设计/方法/方法首先查看资产负债表中报告的房地产资产,可以深入了解所有权战略的可能变化。这是使用基于投资组合的方法根据房地产资产对公司进行细分的基础,然后使用Fama和French多因素模型对其对资本市场回报的影响进行分析。调查结果总的来说,房地产资产的份额在过去10年中有所下降 多年来,尽管恰逢英国脱欧投票,但制造业等一些行业出现了转机。与此同时,所有权被作为资本市场的一个因素定价,这适用于跨行业的样本,以及制造业和服务业中单独考虑的部门。定价也显示出反周期模式。实际含义企业房地产管理应意识到所有权的负面影响,尤其是在经济波动的背景下。所有权的减少可以降低相关的资本成本,提高公司的成功率。独创性/价值先前的英国相关研究大多涉及2008年全球经济危机之前的一段时间,因此,由于新的企业环境条件,基于不准确的指标或主要涉及零售部门,这些研究过于陈旧,无法反映对企业房地产所有权的看法发生了变化。这一研究差距已经缩小。
{"title":"The pricing of corporate real estate holdings on the UK capital market","authors":"Julian Seger, K. Stoner, Andreas Pfnuer","doi":"10.1108/jcre-11-2020-0059","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-11-2020-0059","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000The purpose of this study is to find out if corporate real estate ownership is priced into the capital market performance of non-property companies in the UK. This is of particular interest because ownership still represents a significant weight on the balance sheets and is predominantly considered unfavourable due to its bulkiness and difficult revisability in the event of changes in space demand. This draws attention to the UK as one of the most important European economies that have been exposed to strong uncertainties and dynamics, for example, due to the withdrawal voting of the United Kingdom from the European Union (BREXIT).\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000A first look at the real estate assets reported in balance sheets provides insight into possible changes in ownership strategy. This serves as a basis for subdividing companies based on their real estate assets using a portfolio-based approach and that are then analysed using the Fama and French multi-factor model with regard to their influence on capital market returns.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000In general, the share of real estate assets has fallen over the past 10 years, although coinciding with BREXIT voting, some industries such as manufacturing show a turnaround. At the same time, ownership is priced in as a factor on the capital market, which applies to a sample across industries, as well as to separately considered sectors in the manufacturing and service industries. The pricing also shows a counter-cyclical pattern.\u0000\u0000\u0000Practical implications\u0000Corporate real estate management should be aware of the negative influence of ownership, especially against the background of economic fluctuations. The reduction of ownership can reduce the associated cost of capital and increase company success.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000Previous UK-related studies mostly refer to a period before the global economic crisis in 2008, and therefore, are too old to reflect a changed view on corporate real estate ownership because of new corporate environmental conditions, based on inaccurate proxies or mainly refer to the retail segment. This research gap is closed.\u0000","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42918440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Managing COVID-19 in workplaces – a theoretical framework for integral employees’ health 在工作场所管理COVID-19——员工整体健康的理论框架
IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2021-08-24 DOI: 10.1108/jcre-10-2020-0045
Sandra Gauer, Barbara Germann
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a framework on how to deal with stressors emerging from the COVID-19 outbreak. The theoretical framework aims to explain pandemic-related stressors and potential ways to prevent them, considering a wide range of interacting factors at individual, team and organizational levels to ensure their employees’ health.Design/methodology/approachThe authors drew on an integrative literature review to identify pandemic-related stressors influenceable by the organization and gathered solution approaches to counteract them. Popular psychological stress theories served as a theoretical base for the framework.FindingsThe authors based the framework on an integration of the transactional stress theory (Lazarus and Folkman, 1984) and the job demands resources model (Schaufeli and Bakker, 2004), focusing on their respective theoretical strengths. The final framework offers a solid orientation for scholars regarding the introduction of holistic and strategic measures in coping with pandemic-related stressors. A section describing possibilities for practitioners’ use of the framework has been integrated.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to offer a framework on how to handle COVID-19-related stressors in the workplace by implementing teamwide and companywide measures.
本文的目的是为如何应对新冠肺炎疫情带来的压力制定一个框架。该理论框架旨在解释与大流行相关的压力源和潜在的预防方法,考虑到个人、团队和组织层面的各种相互作用因素,以确保员工的健康。设计/方法/方法作者利用综合文献综述来确定可受本组织影响的与流行病有关的压力因素,并收集解决这些压力的方法。流行的心理压力理论为该框架提供了理论基础。研究结果作者将交易压力理论(Lazarus and Folkman, 1984)和工作需求资源模型(Schaufeli and Bakker, 2004)整合为框架,重点关注各自的理论优势。最后的框架为学者们在应对与大流行有关的压力源方面采取全面和战略措施提供了坚实的方向。一个章节描述了从业者使用框架的可能性。据作者所知,这项研究首次提供了一个框架,说明如何通过实施团队和公司范围内的措施来处理工作场所中与covid -19相关的压力源。
{"title":"Managing COVID-19 in workplaces – a theoretical framework for integral employees’ health","authors":"Sandra Gauer, Barbara Germann","doi":"10.1108/jcre-10-2020-0045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-10-2020-0045","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\u0000The purpose of this paper is to develop a framework on how to deal with stressors emerging from the COVID-19 outbreak. The theoretical framework aims to explain pandemic-related stressors and potential ways to prevent them, considering a wide range of interacting factors at individual, team and organizational levels to ensure their employees’ health.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000The authors drew on an integrative literature review to identify pandemic-related stressors influenceable by the organization and gathered solution approaches to counteract them. Popular psychological stress theories served as a theoretical base for the framework.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The authors based the framework on an integration of the transactional stress theory (Lazarus and Folkman, 1984) and the job demands resources model (Schaufeli and Bakker, 2004), focusing on their respective theoretical strengths. The final framework offers a solid orientation for scholars regarding the introduction of holistic and strategic measures in coping with pandemic-related stressors. A section describing possibilities for practitioners’ use of the framework has been integrated.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to offer a framework on how to handle COVID-19-related stressors in the workplace by implementing teamwide and companywide measures.","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42649701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Classifying changes. A taxonomy of contemporary coworking spaces 分类的变化。当代联合办公空间的分类
IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2021-08-24 DOI: 10.1108/jcre-12-2020-0061
Marko Orel, Will M. Bennis
PurposeDuring the past decade, the coworking concept has expanded and evolved along with the industry associated with it, so that references to coworking often refer to notions quite distinct from the original conception. The purpose of this paper is to establish a classification of contemporary coworking environments and clarify the scholarly, as well as the industry usage of a coworking model.Design/methodology/approachThe paper reviews popular and scientific literature and the authors’ field experience in the industry to derive three defining features of coworking and distinct categories that help clarify the concept and can be used to identify and evaluate coworking spaces.FindingsThe main finding behind the following paper is the taxonomy of contemporary coworking spaces that takes into account the broad spectrum of shared workspaces that commonly receive the coworking label, specifies the features required to warrant that label and provides a framework for understanding the defining factors of a coworking model. The taxonomy showcases four unalike types of coworking spaces and the three types of non-coworking shared offices that are repeatedly and somewhat mistakenly labeled as coworking environments.Originality/valueUnderstanding the core differentiation between unalike models would enable scholars to guide and structure the study to evolve in coworking research. The taxonomy can be seen as a base for further research in the field of coworking that helps ensure scholars are sufficiently specific and distinctive in the shared subject of their research, suggests a roadmap for future coworking research and provides a tool to evaluate real-world examples of work environments concerning the degree they fit the coworking concept.
目的在过去的十年里,共同工作的概念随着相关行业的发展而扩展和演变,因此提及共同工作通常指与最初概念截然不同的概念。本文的目的是建立当代共同工作环境的分类,并澄清共同工作模式的学术和行业用途。设计/方法论/方法本文回顾了流行的科学文献以及作者在该行业的实地经验,得出了共同工作的三个定义特征和不同的类别,这些特征有助于澄清概念,并可用于识别和评估共同工作空间。发现以下论文背后的主要发现是当代共同工作空间的分类,该分类考虑了通常接受共同工作标签的广泛共享工作空间,指定了保证该标签所需的特征,并为理解共同工作模型的定义因素提供了框架。该分类法展示了四种不相似类型的共同工作空间和三种类型的非共同工作共享办公室,它们被反复错误地标记为共同工作环境。独创性/价值理解非同类模型之间的核心差异将使学者能够指导和构建共同工作研究中的研究。该分类法可以被视为共同工作领域进一步研究的基础,有助于确保学者在共同研究的主题上足够具体和独特,为未来的共同工作研究提供了路线图,并提供了一个工具来评估现实世界中的工作环境示例,这些示例与共同工作概念的契合程度。
{"title":"Classifying changes. A taxonomy of contemporary coworking spaces","authors":"Marko Orel, Will M. Bennis","doi":"10.1108/jcre-12-2020-0061","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-12-2020-0061","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000During the past decade, the coworking concept has expanded and evolved along with the industry associated with it, so that references to coworking often refer to notions quite distinct from the original conception. The purpose of this paper is to establish a classification of contemporary coworking environments and clarify the scholarly, as well as the industry usage of a coworking model.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000The paper reviews popular and scientific literature and the authors’ field experience in the industry to derive three defining features of coworking and distinct categories that help clarify the concept and can be used to identify and evaluate coworking spaces.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The main finding behind the following paper is the taxonomy of contemporary coworking spaces that takes into account the broad spectrum of shared workspaces that commonly receive the coworking label, specifies the features required to warrant that label and provides a framework for understanding the defining factors of a coworking model. The taxonomy showcases four unalike types of coworking spaces and the three types of non-coworking shared offices that are repeatedly and somewhat mistakenly labeled as coworking environments.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000Understanding the core differentiation between unalike models would enable scholars to guide and structure the study to evolve in coworking research. The taxonomy can be seen as a base for further research in the field of coworking that helps ensure scholars are sufficiently specific and distinctive in the shared subject of their research, suggests a roadmap for future coworking research and provides a tool to evaluate real-world examples of work environments concerning the degree they fit the coworking concept.\u0000","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47089593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
Co-working, co-learning and culture – co-creation of future tech lab in Namibia 纳米比亚未来科技实验室的共同工作、共同学习和共同创造
IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2021-08-19 DOI: 10.1108/jcre-01-2021-0004
Marko Lahti, Suvi Nenonen, E. Sutinen
PurposeFuture places for learning and working are digitally and physically integrated hybrid environments. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the co-creation process of the remote presence-based digital and physical co-working and co-learning place. The context is cross-cultural when Finnish space approach is applied and further developed in Namibia.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative case study is conducted of the Future Tech Lab (FT Lab) in the University of Namibia’s main campus. The case study of the FT Lab is about 200m2 space with three different zones in the University of Namibia’s main campus. The physical solution encourages collaboration and technical solutions interlink the place overseas by using the remote presence. The data are gathered by using document analysis, observations, participatory workshops and interviews including structured questionnaire.FindingsThe action design research approach is a functional framework to co-create hybrid environments in two ways. It helps to design digital and physical solutions as integrated entity. Additionally, it provides a tool to analyse decision-making processes as well as design initiatives, also from the cultural perspective. Both Finnish and Namibian cultures are normative and feminine, which helped the realisation of the project based on mutual trust. However, the differences in power distance were affecting the process fluency and decision-making processes.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings indicate that the co-design of the hybrid-learning environment sets requirements for the physical solution such as surface materials for premises and retrofitting of technology, which need to be considered by co-creation from the shared vision to realisation of the space. The co-creation involves many stakeholders, and cultural differences have a different impact on various stages of the co-creation process.Originality/valueThe cultural context in the case study provides an interesting comparison between the Finnish and Namibian approach. The remote presence and its requirements provide new knowledge and guidelines for co-creation of hybrid environments.
目的未来的学习和工作场所是数字化和物理一体化的混合环境。本文的目的是分析基于远程存在的数字和物理协同工作和协同学习场所的共创过程。当芬兰的空间方法在纳米比亚得到应用和进一步发展时,背景是跨文化的。设计/方法/方法对纳米比亚大学主校区的未来技术实验室(FT实验室)进行了定性案例研究。FT实验室的案例研究位于纳米比亚大学主校区,占地约200平方米,有三个不同的区域。物理解决方案鼓励合作,技术解决方案通过远程存在将海外连接起来。数据是通过文件分析、观察、参与式研讨会和访谈(包括结构化问卷)收集的。发现行动设计研究方法是一种以两种方式共同创建混合环境的功能框架。它有助于将数字和物理解决方案设计为集成实体。此外,它还提供了一个从文化角度分析决策过程和设计举措的工具。芬兰和纳米比亚的文化都是规范的和女性化的,这有助于在相互信任的基础上实现该项目。然而,权力距离的差异正在影响过程的流畅性和决策过程。研究局限性/含义研究结果表明,混合学习环境的共同设计对物理解决方案提出了要求,如房屋表面材料和技术改造,需要通过从共同愿景到实现空间的共同创造来考虑这些要求。共创涉及许多利益相关者,文化差异对共创过程的各个阶段有不同的影响。创意/价值案例研究中的文化背景提供了芬兰和纳米比亚方法之间有趣的比较。远程存在及其要求为共同创建混合环境提供了新的知识和指导方针。
{"title":"Co-working, co-learning and culture – co-creation of future tech lab in Namibia","authors":"Marko Lahti, Suvi Nenonen, E. Sutinen","doi":"10.1108/jcre-01-2021-0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-01-2021-0004","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000Future places for learning and working are digitally and physically integrated hybrid environments. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the co-creation process of the remote presence-based digital and physical co-working and co-learning place. The context is cross-cultural when Finnish space approach is applied and further developed in Namibia.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000A qualitative case study is conducted of the Future Tech Lab (FT Lab) in the University of Namibia’s main campus. The case study of the FT Lab is about 200m2 space with three different zones in the University of Namibia’s main campus. The physical solution encourages collaboration and technical solutions interlink the place overseas by using the remote presence. The data are gathered by using document analysis, observations, participatory workshops and interviews including structured questionnaire.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The action design research approach is a functional framework to co-create hybrid environments in two ways. It helps to design digital and physical solutions as integrated entity. Additionally, it provides a tool to analyse decision-making processes as well as design initiatives, also from the cultural perspective. Both Finnish and Namibian cultures are normative and feminine, which helped the realisation of the project based on mutual trust. However, the differences in power distance were affecting the process fluency and decision-making processes.\u0000\u0000\u0000Research limitations/implications\u0000The findings indicate that the co-design of the hybrid-learning environment sets requirements for the physical solution such as surface materials for premises and retrofitting of technology, which need to be considered by co-creation from the shared vision to realisation of the space. The co-creation involves many stakeholders, and cultural differences have a different impact on various stages of the co-creation process.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000The cultural context in the case study provides an interesting comparison between the Finnish and Namibian approach. The remote presence and its requirements provide new knowledge and guidelines for co-creation of hybrid environments.\u0000","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47167313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Experiencing an augmented-reality assisted assembly task autonomy, passive work attitude, and responsibility 体验增强现实辅助装配任务的自主性、被动的工作态度和责任感
IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2021-08-17 DOI: 10.1108/JCRE-01-2021-0005
Cornelia Gerdenitsch, Thomas Meneweger, Christina Stockreiter, Paul Butterer, Martina Halbwachs, Daniel Scheiblhofer
{"title":"Experiencing an augmented-reality assisted assembly task autonomy, passive work attitude, and responsibility","authors":"Cornelia Gerdenitsch, Thomas Meneweger, Christina Stockreiter, Paul Butterer, Martina Halbwachs, Daniel Scheiblhofer","doi":"10.1108/JCRE-01-2021-0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-01-2021-0005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46170090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Corporate Real Estate
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1