首页 > 最新文献

Team Performance Management最新文献

英文 中文
Trust and performance in business teams: a meta-analysis 商业团队的信任与绩效:一项荟萃分析
IF 1.7 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2020-07-17 DOI: 10.1108/tpm-02-2020-0012
Amy M. Morrissette, Jennifer L. Kisamore
The purpose of this study is two-fold. First, the nature of the relationship between team trust and team performance in the business context is determined. Second, both team design (team size and team type) and methodological moderators (source of criterion measure and study date) of the relationship are assessed.,A random-effects meta-analysis was performed on published and unpublished empirical studies. Subgroup moderator analyses were conducted using Cochran’s Q. Continuous moderator analyses were conducted using meta-regression.,Data from 55 independent studies (3,671 teams) were pooled. Results indicated a large, positive relationship between team trust and team performance in real business teams. Further analyses indicated that the relationship was significantly moderated by business team type, team size and source of criterion measure.,Results indicate that different team types, sizes and performance criteria should not be treated as equivalent. Results are based on cross-sectional research and can only be generalized to business teams.,Managers should be attentive to trust issues in work teams, as they may portend future performance problems or mirror other organizational issues that affect team performance. Team function and size predict how team trust is related to team performance.,The present study answers a call by Costa et al. (2018) for additional investigation of moderators of the trust-performance relationship in teams using a quantitative review of studies.
这项研究的目的有两个。首先,确定了业务环境中团队信任和团队绩效之间关系的性质。其次,评估了团队设计(团队规模和团队类型)和关系的方法调节因素(标准测量的来源和研究日期)。,对已发表和未发表的实证研究进行了随机效应荟萃分析。使用Cochran Q进行亚组调节因子分析。使用元回归进行连续调节因子分析。,汇集了55项独立研究(3671个团队)的数据。研究结果表明,在真实的商业团队中,团队信任与团队绩效之间存在很大的正相关关系。进一步的分析表明,业务团队类型、团队规模和标准测度来源显著调节了这种关系。,结果表明,不同的团队类型、规模和绩效标准不应被视为等同的。结果基于横断面研究,只能推广到业务团队。,管理者应该注意工作团队中的信任问题,因为这些问题可能预示着未来的绩效问题,或者反映出影响团队绩效的其他组织问题。团队功能和规模预测团队信任与团队绩效的关系。,本研究回应了Costa等人的呼吁。(2018)通过对研究的定量审查,对团队中信任-绩效关系的调节因素进行进一步调查。
{"title":"Trust and performance in business teams: a meta-analysis","authors":"Amy M. Morrissette, Jennifer L. Kisamore","doi":"10.1108/tpm-02-2020-0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-02-2020-0012","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is two-fold. First, the nature of the relationship between team trust and team performance in the business context is determined. Second, both team design (team size and team type) and methodological moderators (source of criterion measure and study date) of the relationship are assessed.,A random-effects meta-analysis was performed on published and unpublished empirical studies. Subgroup moderator analyses were conducted using Cochran’s Q. Continuous moderator analyses were conducted using meta-regression.,Data from 55 independent studies (3,671 teams) were pooled. Results indicated a large, positive relationship between team trust and team performance in real business teams. Further analyses indicated that the relationship was significantly moderated by business team type, team size and source of criterion measure.,Results indicate that different team types, sizes and performance criteria should not be treated as equivalent. Results are based on cross-sectional research and can only be generalized to business teams.,Managers should be attentive to trust issues in work teams, as they may portend future performance problems or mirror other organizational issues that affect team performance. Team function and size predict how team trust is related to team performance.,The present study answers a call by Costa et al. (2018) for additional investigation of moderators of the trust-performance relationship in teams using a quantitative review of studies.","PeriodicalId":46084,"journal":{"name":"Team Performance Management","volume":"26 1","pages":"287-300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2020-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/tpm-02-2020-0012","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49302375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Framework of on-board team effectiveness: a qualitative study of shipping industry 船上团队效能框架:航运业的定性研究
IF 1.7 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2020-07-17 DOI: 10.1108/tpm-02-2020-0010
S. Jha
Marine experts have recognised the importance of on-board teamwork for a ship’s safe operation. The purpose of the study is to develop a framework of “on-board team effectiveness” as perceived by the seafarers with the help of conceptual categories discovered from the study. It describes and explain how members of floating shipboard team operates in a global environment which is dynamic, complex and full of challenges.,Qualitative research design was used to study wherein the grounded theory approach was adopted for data analysis. A purposive sample of 44 Indian seafarers covering all ranks and departments of the shipboard team were selected for the study. Primary data were collected through long interviews and focused group discussions with the respondents. Secondary data were collected through industry periodicals.,Ten conceptual categories were developed, and their interplay was identified to understand various aspects of shipboard team working in different contexts.,The insights gained from the study can be used to enhance shipboard team’s working and safe operation of the ship.,The study is unique in addressing team effectiveness issues of shipboard teams. Understanding teamwork effectiveness of a culturally diversified shipboard team shall facilitate safe working practices and act as a deterrent to human errors, which causes accidents and incidents.
海事专家已经认识到船上团队合作对船舶安全运行的重要性。本研究的目的是借助研究中发现的概念类别,制定海员所感知的“船上团队有效性”框架。它描述并解释了漂浮船上团队的成员如何在动态、复杂和充满挑战的全球环境中运作。,定性研究设计用于研究,其中采用扎根理论方法进行数据分析。选择了44名印度海员作为研究对象,他们涵盖了船上团队的所有级别和部门。主要数据是通过与受访者的长时间访谈和重点小组讨论收集的。二次数据通过行业期刊收集。,开发了十个概念类别,并确定了它们的相互作用,以了解船上团队在不同背景下工作的各个方面。,从研究中获得的见解可用于加强船上团队的工作和船舶的安全操作。,这项研究在解决船上团队的团队效能问题方面是独一无二的。了解文化多元化船上团队的团队合作效率,应促进安全工作实践,并对导致事故和事件的人为错误起到威慑作用。
{"title":"Framework of on-board team effectiveness: a qualitative study of shipping industry","authors":"S. Jha","doi":"10.1108/tpm-02-2020-0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-02-2020-0010","url":null,"abstract":"Marine experts have recognised the importance of on-board teamwork for a ship’s safe operation. The purpose of the study is to develop a framework of “on-board team effectiveness” as perceived by the seafarers with the help of conceptual categories discovered from the study. It describes and explain how members of floating shipboard team operates in a global environment which is dynamic, complex and full of challenges.,Qualitative research design was used to study wherein the grounded theory approach was adopted for data analysis. A purposive sample of 44 Indian seafarers covering all ranks and departments of the shipboard team were selected for the study. Primary data were collected through long interviews and focused group discussions with the respondents. Secondary data were collected through industry periodicals.,Ten conceptual categories were developed, and their interplay was identified to understand various aspects of shipboard team working in different contexts.,The insights gained from the study can be used to enhance shipboard team’s working and safe operation of the ship.,The study is unique in addressing team effectiveness issues of shipboard teams. Understanding teamwork effectiveness of a culturally diversified shipboard team shall facilitate safe working practices and act as a deterrent to human errors, which causes accidents and incidents.","PeriodicalId":46084,"journal":{"name":"Team Performance Management","volume":"26 1","pages":"265-285"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2020-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/tpm-02-2020-0010","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47484342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Adult third culture kids: expatriate potential is one piece of the puzzle 成人第三文化的孩子:移居国外的潜力是拼图的一部分
IF 1.7 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI: 10.1108/tpm-11-2019-0108
Megan Nash
Adult third culture kids (ATCK) have been identified as a potential source for global business because of their experience in expatriation and increased intercultural competence. The purpose of this paper is to build on existing research focused on this population and to highlight crucial areas for further study to gain more comprehensive insight to their potential in working teams.,This viewpoint design reviews previous literature and research on ATCK and their potential for business expatriation and raises questions for areas of necessary further research to better understand their impact upon assignment.,There is strong support for ATCK suitability and inclination for expatriate assignment from previous literature. There is much unknown about their performance upon expatriation and a need for further research specific to ATCK performance in teams and organizations.,This study poses questions about translating ATCK experience into team performance; emphasizes the challenges in isolating one trait in personal development and the risks of conflating ATCK experience in professional capabilities.
成年第三文化儿童(ATCK)已被确定为全球业务的潜在来源,因为他们在国外的经验和增加的跨文化能力。本文的目的是建立在现有研究的基础上,重点关注这一人群,并强调进一步研究的关键领域,以更全面地了解他们在工作团队中的潜力。本观点设计回顾了以前关于ATCK的文献和研究,以及它们对商业外派的潜力,并提出了必要的进一步研究领域的问题,以更好地了解它们对任务的影响。从以往的文献中,有强烈的支持ATCK适合和倾向于外派任务。他们在外派后的表现有很多未知之处,需要进一步研究ATCK在团队和组织中的表现。本研究提出了如何将ATCK经验转化为团队绩效的问题;强调在个人发展中孤立一种特质的挑战,以及将ATCK经验与专业能力混为一谈的风险。
{"title":"Adult third culture kids: expatriate potential is one piece of the puzzle","authors":"Megan Nash","doi":"10.1108/tpm-11-2019-0108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-11-2019-0108","url":null,"abstract":"Adult third culture kids (ATCK) have been identified as a potential source for global business because of their experience in expatriation and increased intercultural competence. The purpose of this paper is to build on existing research focused on this population and to highlight crucial areas for further study to gain more comprehensive insight to their potential in working teams.,This viewpoint design reviews previous literature and research on ATCK and their potential for business expatriation and raises questions for areas of necessary further research to better understand their impact upon assignment.,There is strong support for ATCK suitability and inclination for expatriate assignment from previous literature. There is much unknown about their performance upon expatriation and a need for further research specific to ATCK performance in teams and organizations.,This study poses questions about translating ATCK experience into team performance; emphasizes the challenges in isolating one trait in personal development and the risks of conflating ATCK experience in professional capabilities.","PeriodicalId":46084,"journal":{"name":"Team Performance Management","volume":"26 1","pages":"319-323"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/tpm-11-2019-0108","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44720073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
A study of the influence of project managers’ signature strengths on project team resilience 项目经理签名优势对项目团队弹性的影响研究
IF 1.7 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2020-05-28 DOI: 10.1108/tpm-12-2018-0081
J. Karlsen, M. Berg
This paper aims to study the influence of project managers’ signature strengths on project team resilience.,The authors performed a qualitative multiple case study design to explore the research question. Open-ended interviews, site visits, observations and documents were the data sources. The authors used character strengths and virtues within positive psychology as a theoretical framework in the data analysis.,The main finding of this study is that the project manager’s use of signature strengths influences the resilience of the project team. The cross-case analysis revealed four signature strengths – leadership, open-mindedness, persistence and hope – that influenced team resilience in all three studied cases.,Future research should investigate other organizations, types of projects and countries so that the findings may be generalized.,This paper provides managers and teams with useful insights on signature strengths and team resilience. The findings stress the importance of managers being aware of their signature strengths and knowing how to use them. As the working situation today is often more complex, uncertain and difficult than ever, it is important to have resilient managers and teams.,This study contributes to increased knowledge on signature strengths and team resilience.
本文旨在研究项目经理签名优势对项目团队弹性的影响。作者进行了定性的多案例研究设计来探讨研究问题。开放式访谈、实地考察、观察和文件是数据来源。作者将积极心理学中的性格优势和美德作为数据分析的理论框架。本研究的主要发现是项目经理对签名优势的使用影响了项目团队的弹性。跨案例分析揭示了四个标志性优势——领导力、开放性、毅力和希望——在所有三个研究案例中都影响了团队的弹性。今后的研究应调查其他组织、项目类型和国家,以便研究结果可以普遍化。本文为管理者和团队提供了关于签名优势和团队弹性的有用见解。研究结果强调了管理者意识到自己的标志性优势并知道如何利用它们的重要性。由于当今的工作环境往往比以往任何时候都更加复杂、不确定和困难,因此拥有有弹性的管理者和团队非常重要。本研究有助于增加对签名优势和团队弹性的认识。
{"title":"A study of the influence of project managers’ signature strengths on project team resilience","authors":"J. Karlsen, M. Berg","doi":"10.1108/tpm-12-2018-0081","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-12-2018-0081","url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to study the influence of project managers’ signature strengths on project team resilience.,The authors performed a qualitative multiple case study design to explore the research question. Open-ended interviews, site visits, observations and documents were the data sources. The authors used character strengths and virtues within positive psychology as a theoretical framework in the data analysis.,The main finding of this study is that the project manager’s use of signature strengths influences the resilience of the project team. The cross-case analysis revealed four signature strengths – leadership, open-mindedness, persistence and hope – that influenced team resilience in all three studied cases.,Future research should investigate other organizations, types of projects and countries so that the findings may be generalized.,This paper provides managers and teams with useful insights on signature strengths and team resilience. The findings stress the importance of managers being aware of their signature strengths and knowing how to use them. As the working situation today is often more complex, uncertain and difficult than ever, it is important to have resilient managers and teams.,This study contributes to increased knowledge on signature strengths and team resilience.","PeriodicalId":46084,"journal":{"name":"Team Performance Management","volume":"26 1","pages":"247-262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2020-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/tpm-12-2018-0081","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"62441546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Personality configurations in teams: a comparison of compilation and composition models 团队中的个性配置:编译和组合模型的比较
IF 1.7 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2020-05-04 DOI: 10.1108/tpm-09-2019-0097
Kathryn Ostermeier, Mark A. Davis, R. Pavur
The purpose of this study is to examine the facilitating and inhibiting influence of team-level negative affectivity and conscientiousness on a dyad of emergent states, adopting and comparing both the composition and compilation perspectives.,Data were collected over three time points from 410 undergraduate students nested within cross-functional project teams (N = 62). The data, including individual self-reports and judges’ ratings of team performance, were aggregated to the team-level using both composition (mean) and compilation (skewness) approaches.,The findings indicate that mean-levels of negative affectivity were associated with decreased psychological safety. The use of skewed conscientiousness counterintuitively suggests too many highly conscientious members can also be detrimental to psychological safety. Psychological safety influences team potency and ultimately performance.,The results of this study highlight that the aggregation approach used is important. For example, the use of skewed (but not mean-level) conscientiousness brought an undetected and counterintuitive relationship to light. Future research should use compilation approaches in addition to composition approaches.
本研究旨在探讨团队层面负性情感和责任心对两种紧急状态的促进和抑制作用,并采用构成和汇编两种观点进行比较。数据是在三个时间点从410名嵌套在跨职能项目团队中的本科生(N = 62)中收集的。数据,包括个人自我报告和评委对团队表现的评级,使用组合(平均值)和汇编(偏度)方法汇总到团队层面。研究结果表明,消极情绪的平均水平与心理安全感的下降有关。与直觉相反,使用扭曲的尽责性表明,太多高度尽责的成员也可能对心理安全有害。心理安全影响团队效能,最终影响团队表现。本研究的结果强调了所使用的聚合方法的重要性。例如,使用歪斜的(但不是平均水平的)责任心,揭示了一种未被发现的、违反直觉的关系。未来的研究除了组合方法外,还应采用编译方法。
{"title":"Personality configurations in teams: a comparison of compilation and composition models","authors":"Kathryn Ostermeier, Mark A. Davis, R. Pavur","doi":"10.1108/tpm-09-2019-0097","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-09-2019-0097","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to examine the facilitating and inhibiting influence of team-level negative affectivity and conscientiousness on a dyad of emergent states, adopting and comparing both the composition and compilation perspectives.,Data were collected over three time points from 410 undergraduate students nested within cross-functional project teams (N = 62). The data, including individual self-reports and judges’ ratings of team performance, were aggregated to the team-level using both composition (mean) and compilation (skewness) approaches.,The findings indicate that mean-levels of negative affectivity were associated with decreased psychological safety. The use of skewed conscientiousness counterintuitively suggests too many highly conscientious members can also be detrimental to psychological safety. Psychological safety influences team potency and ultimately performance.,The results of this study highlight that the aggregation approach used is important. For example, the use of skewed (but not mean-level) conscientiousness brought an undetected and counterintuitive relationship to light. Future research should use compilation approaches in addition to composition approaches.","PeriodicalId":46084,"journal":{"name":"Team Performance Management","volume":"26 1","pages":"227-246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2020-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/tpm-09-2019-0097","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41707112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
The Magellan effect – training future naval officers for mission command 麦哲伦效应——训练未来的海军军官执行任务指挥
IF 1.7 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2020-04-16 DOI: 10.1108/tpm-01-2018-0008
E. Sjøvold, Odd Arne Nissestad
Officers in post-cold war military operations frequently encounter situations that are not easily handled through central control and chain of command, but demand a more flexible leadership style and the ability to yield some control to subordinates. This study aims to investigate what it takes to train military leaders to master such Maneuver Warfare skills in a culture that still, unconsciously, fosters a chain of command structure.,Using a quasi-experimental pre-post design, the authors studied 30 teams of naval cadets (n = 228) in three separate Leadership Development Programs, each of 12 months full time duration. In the three otherwise identical programs, the authors varied one of the major exercises (sailing) both in duration and degree of structure and challenge. Parameters of team interaction were measured using the Systematizing the Person-Group Relation method and summarized in a construct labeled synergy.,One of the cohorts showed a significant positive effect. This cohort sailed a barque for ten weeks, crossing the Atlantic during winter storms. Apart from the clear mission of sailing the ship safely back to its home haven, they received no further instructions or training. Although the duration and the challenge likely count for part of the result, the authors argue that the lack of initial structure combined with a shared mission were more important.,Because of the cost and time involved in each program, it was not possible to independently vary duration, structure and mission. As a result, conclusions as to the reason for the greater positive effect seen in one of the programs cannot be definitively determined.,The study contributes to the understanding of the effect of unstructured situations on building Maneuver Warfare skills.
冷战后军事行动中的军官经常遇到无法通过中央控制和指挥链轻松处理的情况,但需要更灵活的领导风格和将一些控制权交给下属的能力。这项研究旨在调查在一种仍在不知不觉中形成指挥链结构的文化中,如何训练军事领导人掌握这种机动作战技能。,采用准实验性的岗前设计,作者研究了三个独立的领导力发展项目中的30个海军学员团队(n=228),每个项目有12个 月全职时间。在三个完全相同的项目中,作者改变了其中一项主要练习(帆船)的持续时间、结构和挑战程度。团队互动的参数使用人-组关系系统化方法进行测量,并在标记为协同的结构中进行总结。,其中一组显示出显著的积极作用。这群人在冬季风暴中横渡大西洋,在酒吧里航行了十个星期。除了让船安全返回母港的明确任务外,他们没有得到进一步的指示或训练。尽管持续时间和挑战可能是结果的一部分,但作者认为,缺乏初始结构与共同任务相结合更为重要。,由于每个项目涉及的成本和时间,不可能独立地改变持续时间、结构和任务。因此,无法确定其中一个项目产生更大积极影响的原因。,这项研究有助于理解非结构化情况对培养机动作战技能的影响。
{"title":"The Magellan effect – training future naval officers for mission command","authors":"E. Sjøvold, Odd Arne Nissestad","doi":"10.1108/tpm-01-2018-0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-01-2018-0008","url":null,"abstract":"Officers in post-cold war military operations frequently encounter situations that are not easily handled through central control and chain of command, but demand a more flexible leadership style and the ability to yield some control to subordinates. This study aims to investigate what it takes to train military leaders to master such Maneuver Warfare skills in a culture that still, unconsciously, fosters a chain of command structure.,Using a quasi-experimental pre-post design, the authors studied 30 teams of naval cadets (n = 228) in three separate Leadership Development Programs, each of 12 months full time duration. In the three otherwise identical programs, the authors varied one of the major exercises (sailing) both in duration and degree of structure and challenge. Parameters of team interaction were measured using the Systematizing the Person-Group Relation method and summarized in a construct labeled synergy.,One of the cohorts showed a significant positive effect. This cohort sailed a barque for ten weeks, crossing the Atlantic during winter storms. Apart from the clear mission of sailing the ship safely back to its home haven, they received no further instructions or training. Although the duration and the challenge likely count for part of the result, the authors argue that the lack of initial structure combined with a shared mission were more important.,Because of the cost and time involved in each program, it was not possible to independently vary duration, structure and mission. As a result, conclusions as to the reason for the greater positive effect seen in one of the programs cannot be definitively determined.,The study contributes to the understanding of the effect of unstructured situations on building Maneuver Warfare skills.","PeriodicalId":46084,"journal":{"name":"Team Performance Management","volume":"26 1","pages":"169-182"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2020-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/tpm-01-2018-0008","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41636374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Shared cognition in intercultural teams: collaborating without understanding each other 跨文化团队中的共同认知:在不相互理解的情况下合作
IF 1.7 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2020-04-13 DOI: 10.1108/tpm-06-2019-0051
Frode Heldal, E. Sjøvold, Kenneth Stålsett
Severe misunderstandings have been proved to cause significant delays and financial overruns in large engineering projects with teams consisting of people from Western and Asian cultures. The purpose of this study was to determine if differences in shared cognition may explain some of the crucial misunderstandings in intercultural production teams.,The study has used systematizing the person–group relationship (SPGR) survey methodology, supported by interviews, to study mental models in six South Korean teams that also includes Norwegian engineers (52 individuals). In so doing, the study uses the theoretical framework of Healey et al. (2015), where X-mental representations involve actions that are automated and subconscious and C-mental representations involve actions that are verbalized reasonings and conscious. People may share mental models on the X-level without sharing on the C-level, depicting a situation where teams are coordinated without understanding why (surface discordance).,The findings of the study are that people with different cultural backgrounds in an intercultural team may learn to adapt to each other when the context is standardized, without necessarily understanding underlying meanings and intentions behind actions (surface discordance). This may create a perception about team members not needing to explicate opinions (sharing at the C-level). This in turn may create challenges in anomalous situations, where deliberate sharing of C-mental models is required to find new solutions and/or admit errors so that they may be adjusted. The findings indicate that the non-sharing of explicated reasonings (C-mental models) between Norwegians and Koreans contributed in sharing C-mental models, despite having an implicit agreement on how to perform standard tasks (sharing X-mental models).,The study is limited to Norwegians and Koreans working in production teams. Future studies could benefit from more cultures and/or different team contexts. The authors’ believe that the findings may also concern other standardized environments and corroborate previous perspectives on intercultural teams needing to both train (develop similar X-mental representations) and reflect together (develop similar C-mental representations).,Based on our findings we suggest the using of cross-cultural training at a deeper level than previously suggested, training in both social interaction patterns as well as verbalizing logical reasoning together. This entails reaching a shared and joint understanding of not only actions but also values, feelings and teamwork functions. This can be enabled by group conversations and training in dynamic team patterns. Important is, however, that standardized contexts may dampen the perception of the need to do both.,The study contributes to current research on intercultural teams by focusing on a dual-mode perspective on shared cognition, relating these to contextual factors. In this, the authors’ answer the call in previous resea
事实证明,在由来自西方和亚洲文化的人组成的大型工程项目中,严重的误解会导致重大的延误和财务超支。本研究的目的是确定共享认知的差异是否可以解释跨文化生产团队中一些关键的误解。该研究采用了系统化的个人-群体关系(SPGR)调查方法,并辅以访谈,对包括挪威工程师在内的6个韩国团队(52人)的心理模型进行了研究。在此过程中,该研究使用了Healey等人(2015)的理论框架,其中x -心理表征涉及自动和潜意识的行为,c -心理表征涉及言语推理和有意识的行为。人们可能在x层次上共享心智模型,而不在c层次上共享,描述团队在不理解原因(表面不一致)的情况下进行协调。研究发现,跨文化团队中具有不同文化背景的人可能会在语境标准化时学会相互适应,而不一定理解行为背后的潜在含义和意图(表面不一致)。这可能会产生一种团队成员不需要解释意见(在c级分享)的感觉。反过来,这可能会在异常情况下产生挑战,在这种情况下,需要有意识地共享c -心智模型,以找到新的解决方案和/或承认错误,以便进行调整。研究结果表明,尽管挪威人和韩国人在如何执行标准任务(共享x -心智模型)上有隐含的共识,但他们之间不共享明确的推理(c -心智模型)有助于共享c -心智模型。该研究仅限于在生产队工作的挪威人和韩国人。未来的研究可以从更多的文化和/或不同的团队背景中受益。作者认为,这些发现也可能与其他标准化环境有关,并证实了先前关于跨文化团队既需要训练(发展类似的x心理表征)又需要共同反思(发展类似的c心理表征)的观点。根据我们的研究结果,我们建议在比之前建议的更深层次上使用跨文化培训,在社会互动模式和语言逻辑推理方面进行培训。这不仅需要在行动上,还需要在价值观、情感和团队功能上达成共同的理解。这可以通过小组对话和动态团队模式的培训来实现。然而,重要的是,标准化的环境可能会削弱对两者都需要的认识。该研究通过关注共享认知的双模式视角,并将其与情境因素联系起来,为当前跨文化团队的研究做出了贡献。在这方面,作者回应了先前研究中关于上下文问题的更多信息和对跨文化团队互动的关注的呼吁。该研究还显示了x -心智和c -心智共享心智模式之间的差异在实际环境中是如何发挥作用的。
{"title":"Shared cognition in intercultural teams: collaborating without understanding each other","authors":"Frode Heldal, E. Sjøvold, Kenneth Stålsett","doi":"10.1108/tpm-06-2019-0051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-06-2019-0051","url":null,"abstract":"Severe misunderstandings have been proved to cause significant delays and financial overruns in large engineering projects with teams consisting of people from Western and Asian cultures. The purpose of this study was to determine if differences in shared cognition may explain some of the crucial misunderstandings in intercultural production teams.,The study has used systematizing the person–group relationship (SPGR) survey methodology, supported by interviews, to study mental models in six South Korean teams that also includes Norwegian engineers (52 individuals). In so doing, the study uses the theoretical framework of Healey et al. (2015), where X-mental representations involve actions that are automated and subconscious and C-mental representations involve actions that are verbalized reasonings and conscious. People may share mental models on the X-level without sharing on the C-level, depicting a situation where teams are coordinated without understanding why (surface discordance).,The findings of the study are that people with different cultural backgrounds in an intercultural team may learn to adapt to each other when the context is standardized, without necessarily understanding underlying meanings and intentions behind actions (surface discordance). This may create a perception about team members not needing to explicate opinions (sharing at the C-level). This in turn may create challenges in anomalous situations, where deliberate sharing of C-mental models is required to find new solutions and/or admit errors so that they may be adjusted. The findings indicate that the non-sharing of explicated reasonings (C-mental models) between Norwegians and Koreans contributed in sharing C-mental models, despite having an implicit agreement on how to perform standard tasks (sharing X-mental models).,The study is limited to Norwegians and Koreans working in production teams. Future studies could benefit from more cultures and/or different team contexts. The authors’ believe that the findings may also concern other standardized environments and corroborate previous perspectives on intercultural teams needing to both train (develop similar X-mental representations) and reflect together (develop similar C-mental representations).,Based on our findings we suggest the using of cross-cultural training at a deeper level than previously suggested, training in both social interaction patterns as well as verbalizing logical reasoning together. This entails reaching a shared and joint understanding of not only actions but also values, feelings and teamwork functions. This can be enabled by group conversations and training in dynamic team patterns. Important is, however, that standardized contexts may dampen the perception of the need to do both.,The study contributes to current research on intercultural teams by focusing on a dual-mode perspective on shared cognition, relating these to contextual factors. In this, the authors’ answer the call in previous resea","PeriodicalId":46084,"journal":{"name":"Team Performance Management","volume":"26 1","pages":"211-226"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2020-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/tpm-06-2019-0051","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44554382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Healthcare disparities for women hospitalized with myocardial infarction and angina. 因心肌梗塞和心绞痛住院的妇女在医疗保健方面的差异。
IF 5.2 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcz040
Alice M Jackson, Ruiqi Zhang, Iain Findlay, Keith Robertson, Mitchell Lindsay, Tamsin Morris, Brian Forbes, Richard Papworth, Alex McConnachie, Kenneth Mangion, Pardeep S Jhund, Colin McCowan, Colin Berry

Aims: Ischaemic heart disease persists as the leading cause of death in both men and women in most countries and sex disparities, defined as differences in health outcomes and their determinants, may be relevant. We examined sex disparities in presenting characteristics, treatment and all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized with myocardial infarction (MI) or angina.

Methods and results: We conducted a cohort study of all patients admitted with MI or angina (01 October 2013 to 30 June 2016) from a secondary care acute coronary syndrome e-Registry in NHS Scotland linked with national registers of community drug dispensation and mortality data. A total of 7878 patients hospitalized for MI or angina were prospectively included; 3161 (40%) were women. Women were older, more deprived, had a greater burden of comorbidity, were more often treated with guideline-recommended therapy preadmission and less frequently received immediate invasive management. Men were more likely to receive coronary angiography [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.52, confidence interval (CI) 1.37-1.68] and percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted OR 1.68, CI 1.52-1.86). Women were less comprehensively treated with evidence-based therapies post-MI. Women had worse crude survival, primarily those with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (14.3% vs. 8.0% at 1 year, P < 0.001), but this finding was explained by differences in baseline factors. Men with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction had a higher risk of all-cause death at 30 days [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.72, CI 1.16-2.56] and 1 year (adjusted HR 1.38, CI 1.12-1.69).

Conclusion: After taking account of baseline risk factors, sex differences in treatment pathway, use of invasive management, and secondary prevention therapies indicate disparities in guideline-directed management of women hospitalized with MI or angina.

目的:在大多数国家,缺血性心脏病一直是导致男性和女性死亡的主要原因,性别差异(定义为健康结果及其决定因素的差异)可能与此有关。我们研究了心肌梗死(MI)或心绞痛住院患者在发病特征、治疗和全因死亡率方面的性别差异:我们对苏格兰国家医疗服务系统(NHS)的二级医疗急性冠脉综合征电子登记簿中所有因心肌梗死或心绞痛入院的患者(2013 年 10 月 1 日至 2016 年 6 月 30 日)进行了一项队列研究,该登记簿与全国社区药物分配登记簿和死亡率数据相链接。共有 7878 名因心肌梗死或心绞痛住院的患者被纳入前瞻性研究,其中 3161 人(40%)为女性。女性年龄更大、更贫困、合并症更多,更常在入院前接受指南推荐的治疗,较少立即接受侵入性治疗。男性更有可能接受冠状动脉造影术[调整后比值比(OR)1.52,置信区间(CI)1.37-1.68]和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(调整后比值比(OR)1.68,置信区间(CI)1.52-1.86)。女性在心肌梗死后接受循证疗法的综合治疗较少。女性的粗略存活率较低,主要是那些 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者(1 年后为 14.3% 对 8.0%,P在考虑了基线风险因素后,治疗路径、有创管理和二级预防疗法使用方面的性别差异表明,在对因心肌梗死或心绞痛住院的女性进行指导性管理方面存在差异。
{"title":"Healthcare disparities for women hospitalized with myocardial infarction and angina.","authors":"Alice M Jackson, Ruiqi Zhang, Iain Findlay, Keith Robertson, Mitchell Lindsay, Tamsin Morris, Brian Forbes, Richard Papworth, Alex McConnachie, Kenneth Mangion, Pardeep S Jhund, Colin McCowan, Colin Berry","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcz040","DOIUrl":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcz040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Ischaemic heart disease persists as the leading cause of death in both men and women in most countries and sex disparities, defined as differences in health outcomes and their determinants, may be relevant. We examined sex disparities in presenting characteristics, treatment and all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized with myocardial infarction (MI) or angina.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We conducted a cohort study of all patients admitted with MI or angina (01 October 2013 to 30 June 2016) from a secondary care acute coronary syndrome e-Registry in NHS Scotland linked with national registers of community drug dispensation and mortality data. A total of 7878 patients hospitalized for MI or angina were prospectively included; 3161 (40%) were women. Women were older, more deprived, had a greater burden of comorbidity, were more often treated with guideline-recommended therapy preadmission and less frequently received immediate invasive management. Men were more likely to receive coronary angiography [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.52, confidence interval (CI) 1.37-1.68] and percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted OR 1.68, CI 1.52-1.86). Women were less comprehensively treated with evidence-based therapies post-MI. Women had worse crude survival, primarily those with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (14.3% vs. 8.0% at 1 year, P < 0.001), but this finding was explained by differences in baseline factors. Men with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction had a higher risk of all-cause death at 30 days [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.72, CI 1.16-2.56] and 1 year (adjusted HR 1.38, CI 1.12-1.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After taking account of baseline risk factors, sex differences in treatment pathway, use of invasive management, and secondary prevention therapies indicate disparities in guideline-directed management of women hospitalized with MI or angina.</p>","PeriodicalId":46084,"journal":{"name":"Team Performance Management","volume":"12 1","pages":"156-165"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132925/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84380691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Critical factors impacting interdisciplinary university research teams of small size 影响小型跨学科大学研究团队的关键因素
IF 1.7 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2020-03-14 DOI: 10.1108/tpm-07-2019-0068
O. Tkachenko, Alexandre A. Ardichvili
This study aims to explore key factors influencing the work of interdisciplinary university research teams of small size.,This is a multiple-case study of four interdisciplinary university research teams of small size in which science and/or engineering was an important component.,Data analysis revealed 17 critical factors classified into five groups. Although some factors were more influential than others, it was rather multiple factors at various levels of analysis, and not a single factor, that influenced the work of research teams. Another important finding was the identified need to develop project management capacity of university researchers. The study also revealed two strategies, conditioned on the availability of funds, that small university research teams use as a way to adapt to situational demands and research opportunities.,Although previous research examined various aspects pertinent to the work of industry research teams and large research groups, empirical research into interdisciplinary university research teams of small size has been limited.
本研究旨在探讨影响小型大学跨学科研究团队工作的关键因素。这是一个多案例研究,四个跨学科的小型大学研究团队,其中科学和/或工程是一个重要组成部分。数据分析揭示了17个关键因素,分为5类。虽然有些因素比其他因素更有影响力,但在各个分析层面上,影响研究团队工作的是多个因素,而不是单一因素。另一个重要的发现是确定需要发展大学研究人员的项目管理能力。该研究还揭示了两种策略,以资金的可用性为条件,小型大学研究团队将其作为适应情境需求和研究机会的一种方式。虽然以往的研究考察了与行业研究团队和大型研究团队工作相关的各个方面,但对小规模跨学科大学研究团队的实证研究仍然有限。
{"title":"Critical factors impacting interdisciplinary university research teams of small size","authors":"O. Tkachenko, Alexandre A. Ardichvili","doi":"10.1108/tpm-07-2019-0068","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-07-2019-0068","url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to explore key factors influencing the work of interdisciplinary university research teams of small size.,This is a multiple-case study of four interdisciplinary university research teams of small size in which science and/or engineering was an important component.,Data analysis revealed 17 critical factors classified into five groups. Although some factors were more influential than others, it was rather multiple factors at various levels of analysis, and not a single factor, that influenced the work of research teams. Another important finding was the identified need to develop project management capacity of university researchers. The study also revealed two strategies, conditioned on the availability of funds, that small university research teams use as a way to adapt to situational demands and research opportunities.,Although previous research examined various aspects pertinent to the work of industry research teams and large research groups, empirical research into interdisciplinary university research teams of small size has been limited.","PeriodicalId":46084,"journal":{"name":"Team Performance Management","volume":"26 1","pages":"53-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2020-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/tpm-07-2019-0068","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46767346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Context and person-oriented leader in teams: a meta-analytical review 情境与团队中以人为本的领导者:一项元分析综述
IF 1.7 Q3 MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2020-03-12 DOI: 10.1108/tpm-11-2019-0111
Meltem Çeri-Booms
The research studies the role of contextual moderating variables on the relationship between person-oriented leadership behaviors (POLBs) and team performance. The authors claim that the varying effect sizes between POLBs and team performance are large because of the context the team is functioning in. Therefore, based on the framework of Johns (2006), this paper aims to investigate the moderating role of the relevant demographic (leader gender), social (in-group collectivism and team size), task (skill differentiation) and methodological (common method bias and the rater of the team performance) contextual variables in the study.,The authors accumulated evidence from 48 independent primary studies (N team = 4,276) to run the meta-analytic analyses. The authors followed the procedures described by Schmidt and Hunter (2015). For the categorical moderators, the analyzes were aided by the Hunter–Schmidt meta-analysis programs (2.0) (Schmidt and Le, 2014), which is an interactive software using a random-effects model. In the analyzes for the continuous moderators, the authors used Lipsey and Wilson’s (2001) statistical package for the social sciences macros and run meta-regressions using a random-effects model with unrestricted maximum likelihood.,The results indicate that the relationship weakens when female leaders exhibit these behaviors and when the team size increases. On the other hand, in-group collectivism strengthens the relationship. The study also found that the common method bias and the assessment method of the team performance are significant moderators altering the relationship.,The study highlights the perceptual differences and biases based on leader gender. Acknowledging these biases may help practitioners to appreciate the female qualities in leadership and decrease the undervaluation of female effectiveness. To create high-performing teams, leaders in high in-group collectivist countries are expected to develop a family feeling in the team by showing their concern for personal issues and build close interpersonal relationships. Researchers should use multiple sources to assess the predictor and criterion variables and also opt for more objective assessment methods for team performance.,With this study, the authors follow a substantively different perspective compared to the past meta-analytic reviews on this relationship. Rather than testing the inquiry whether there is a relationship between the two variables, the authors specifically focus on the role of contextual moderating variables. Several researchers have acknowledged that contextual considerations are critical in leadership-team performance research. Nevertheless, the body of research remains to be not cohesive. Thus, the study answers a call in the leadership area for a more context-based and cohesive understanding of the effects of leadership on team performance.
本研究探讨情境调节变量在以人为本的领导行为与团队绩效关系中的作用。作者声称,由于团队所处的环境,polb和团队绩效之间的效应大小变化很大。因此,本文旨在基于Johns(2006)的框架,探讨相关人口统计学(领导者性别)、社会(群体内集体主义和团队规模)、任务(技能分化)和方法(共同方法偏差和团队绩效评分)语境变量在研究中的调节作用。作者从48项独立的初步研究(N组= 4276)中收集证据进行meta分析。作者遵循了Schmidt和Hunter(2015)所描述的程序。对于分类调节者,分析由Hunter-Schmidt元分析程序(2.0)辅助(Schmidt and Le, 2014),这是一个使用随机效应模型的交互式软件。在对连续调节因子的分析中,作者使用了Lipsey和Wilson(2001)的社会科学宏观统计软件包,并使用无限制最大似然的随机效应模型运行元回归。结果表明,当女性领导者表现出这些行为时,当团队规模增加时,这种关系会减弱。另一方面,群体内集体主义加强了这种关系。研究还发现,共同方法偏差和团队绩效评估方法是改变关系的显著调节因子。该研究强调了基于领导者性别的感知差异和偏见。承认这些偏见可能有助于从业者欣赏女性的领导品质,减少对女性效率的低估。为了创造高绩效的团队,高度内团体集体主义国家的领导者应该通过表现出对个人问题的关注,在团队中培养一种家庭感,并建立密切的人际关系。研究人员应该使用多种来源来评估预测变量和标准变量,并选择更客观的评估方法来评估团队绩效。在这项研究中,作者遵循了一个与过去关于这一关系的元分析综述截然不同的视角。作者没有测试这两个变量之间是否存在关系,而是特别关注上下文调节变量的作用。一些研究人员已经承认,背景因素在领导团队绩效研究中至关重要。然而,研究的主体仍然没有凝聚力。因此,该研究回应了领导力领域的一个呼吁,即对领导力对团队绩效的影响有一个更基于情境和凝聚力的理解。
{"title":"Context and person-oriented leader in teams: a meta-analytical review","authors":"Meltem Çeri-Booms","doi":"10.1108/tpm-11-2019-0111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-11-2019-0111","url":null,"abstract":"The research studies the role of contextual moderating variables on the relationship between person-oriented leadership behaviors (POLBs) and team performance. The authors claim that the varying effect sizes between POLBs and team performance are large because of the context the team is functioning in. Therefore, based on the framework of Johns (2006), this paper aims to investigate the moderating role of the relevant demographic (leader gender), social (in-group collectivism and team size), task (skill differentiation) and methodological (common method bias and the rater of the team performance) contextual variables in the study.,The authors accumulated evidence from 48 independent primary studies (N team = 4,276) to run the meta-analytic analyses. The authors followed the procedures described by Schmidt and Hunter (2015). For the categorical moderators, the analyzes were aided by the Hunter–Schmidt meta-analysis programs (2.0) (Schmidt and Le, 2014), which is an interactive software using a random-effects model. In the analyzes for the continuous moderators, the authors used Lipsey and Wilson’s (2001) statistical package for the social sciences macros and run meta-regressions using a random-effects model with unrestricted maximum likelihood.,The results indicate that the relationship weakens when female leaders exhibit these behaviors and when the team size increases. On the other hand, in-group collectivism strengthens the relationship. The study also found that the common method bias and the assessment method of the team performance are significant moderators altering the relationship.,The study highlights the perceptual differences and biases based on leader gender. Acknowledging these biases may help practitioners to appreciate the female qualities in leadership and decrease the undervaluation of female effectiveness. To create high-performing teams, leaders in high in-group collectivist countries are expected to develop a family feeling in the team by showing their concern for personal issues and build close interpersonal relationships. Researchers should use multiple sources to assess the predictor and criterion variables and also opt for more objective assessment methods for team performance.,With this study, the authors follow a substantively different perspective compared to the past meta-analytic reviews on this relationship. Rather than testing the inquiry whether there is a relationship between the two variables, the authors specifically focus on the role of contextual moderating variables. Several researchers have acknowledged that contextual considerations are critical in leadership-team performance research. Nevertheless, the body of research remains to be not cohesive. Thus, the study answers a call in the leadership area for a more context-based and cohesive understanding of the effects of leadership on team performance.","PeriodicalId":46084,"journal":{"name":"Team Performance Management","volume":"26 1","pages":"91-121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2020-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/tpm-11-2019-0111","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46860930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
Team Performance Management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1