Pub Date : 2023-05-18DOI: 10.1177/03098168231171635
A. Dinerstein
The contributions to the Forum refer to Simon Clarke’s ‘two stages of the same project’, as Clarke explained regarding Marx’s work. They make apparent that Clarke’s initial intellectual contributions to the critique of political economy, form analysis, value theory, theory of the state and money were essential to his later understanding of the collapse and metamorphosis of the former URSS State Socialism into a capitalist form, and his analysis of the political implications of such transformation on labour relations, working-class interests and class struggle in Russia, other Eastern European countries, China, and Vietnam.
{"title":"The professor and his legacy: Introducing the Forum","authors":"A. Dinerstein","doi":"10.1177/03098168231171635","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168231171635","url":null,"abstract":"The contributions to the Forum refer to Simon Clarke’s ‘two stages of the same project’, as Clarke explained regarding Marx’s work. They make apparent that Clarke’s initial intellectual contributions to the critique of political economy, form analysis, value theory, theory of the state and money were essential to his later understanding of the collapse and metamorphosis of the former URSS State Socialism into a capitalist form, and his analysis of the political implications of such transformation on labour relations, working-class interests and class struggle in Russia, other Eastern European countries, China, and Vietnam.","PeriodicalId":46258,"journal":{"name":"Capital and Class","volume":"46 1","pages":"156 - 164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74324255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-18DOI: 10.1177/03098168231171803
Chris O’Kane
This contribution outlines the value of Simon Clarke’s work on Marxist theory for contemporary heterodox Marxian critical theory in the context of the Marx revival. After speculating about why Clarke’s work has largely been overlooked in the Marx revival, I offer an interpretation of the importance of the double character of Clarke’s critique of political economy as a critical social theory, and the relevance of his critique of crisis-ridden accumulation, the state and periodisation for contemporary heterodox Marxian critical theory.
{"title":"The value of Simon Clarke","authors":"Chris O’Kane","doi":"10.1177/03098168231171803","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168231171803","url":null,"abstract":"This contribution outlines the value of Simon Clarke’s work on Marxist theory for contemporary heterodox Marxian critical theory in the context of the Marx revival. After speculating about why Clarke’s work has largely been overlooked in the Marx revival, I offer an interpretation of the importance of the double character of Clarke’s critique of political economy as a critical social theory, and the relevance of his critique of crisis-ridden accumulation, the state and periodisation for contemporary heterodox Marxian critical theory.","PeriodicalId":46258,"journal":{"name":"Capital and Class","volume":"97 1","pages":"189 - 193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74826953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-18DOI: 10.1177/03098168231171810
S. Ashwin, V. Yakubovich
In 1990, Simon Clarke inaugurated two decades of research of the former Soviet Union through an international collaboration with Russian sociologists that examined a society in the throes of transformation. Along with his colleague Peter Fairbrother, Simon developed a network of Russian researchers in the Institute of Comparative Labour Relations Research. Together they produced a corpus of work that meticulously analysed the impact of economic reform on workplaces and households and the response of workers and their organisations. This piece is an extended version of a published interview with Simon conducted by two of his former students, Sarah Ashwin and Valery Yakubovich.
1990年，西蒙·克拉克(Simon Clarke)通过与俄罗斯社会学家的国际合作，开始了对前苏联长达20年的研究，研究了一个处于转型阵痛中的社会。西蒙和他的同事彼得·费尔布罗泽(Peter Fairbrother)一起，在比较劳动关系研究所(Institute of Comparative Labour Relations Research)建立了一个俄罗斯研究人员网络。他们共同撰写了大量研究报告，细致分析了经济改革对工作场所和家庭的影响，以及工人及其组织的反应。这篇文章是西蒙以前的两个学生萨拉·阿什温和瓦莱里·雅库博维奇对他进行的一次公开采访的扩展版。
{"title":"An inspired collaboration with Russian sociologists: An interview with Simon Clarke","authors":"S. Ashwin, V. Yakubovich","doi":"10.1177/03098168231171810","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168231171810","url":null,"abstract":"In 1990, Simon Clarke inaugurated two decades of research of the former Soviet Union through an international collaboration with Russian sociologists that examined a society in the throes of transformation. Along with his colleague Peter Fairbrother, Simon developed a network of Russian researchers in the Institute of Comparative Labour Relations Research. Together they produced a corpus of work that meticulously analysed the impact of economic reform on workplaces and households and the response of workers and their organisations. This piece is an extended version of a published interview with Simon conducted by two of his former students, Sarah Ashwin and Valery Yakubovich.","PeriodicalId":46258,"journal":{"name":"Capital and Class","volume":"71 1","pages":"201 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76401222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-18DOI: 10.1177/03098168231171814
Claudio Morrison, P. Bizyukov, V. Ilyin, I. Kozina, L. Petrova
For almost 20 years, since the early 1990s, Professor Simon Clarke led multiple international research projects in Russia, China and Vietnam studying labour relations, enterprise restructuring and household economics under post-socialist transition. Breaking out of post-socialist scholarship’s narrow confines, both social and ideological, he led an exploration of the void opened by former Soviet Union disintegration reconnecting with those who brought the brunt of it. Equally unique among western scholars was his promotion of a vast network of former Soviet Union researchers and activists, later formalised in the Institute for Comparative Research in Labour Relations. Here, for the first time, some of its leading scholars reflect on his legacy, methods and ever-lasting contribution to the advancement of sociology and social activism in Russia. Their accounts convey the radically alternative character of the overall project, returning both achievements and limitations. In substantive terms, the emerging picture confirms the indeterminacy and complexity of Clarke’s original findings: no linear development from ‘the subsumption of labour under capital’ to ‘familiar patterns of class conflict’ has occurred. Instead, growing labour protests follow labour degradation and restructuring, a strong state becoming the arbiter in the stand-off between neoliberalism and workers’ resistance.
自20世纪90年代初以来，西蒙·克拉克教授在俄罗斯、中国和越南领导了多个国际研究项目，研究后社会主义转型下的劳资关系、企业重组和家庭经济。他打破了后社会主义学术在社会和意识形态方面的狭隘局限，领导了对前苏联解体带来的空白的探索，并与那些带来冲击的人重新联系起来。在西方学者中，同样独特的是，他推动了一个由前苏联研究人员和活动人士组成的庞大网络，后来在劳工关系比较研究所(Institute for Comparative Research in Labour Relations)正式形成。在这里，它的一些主要学者第一次反思他的遗产，方法和对俄罗斯社会学和社会行动主义进步的永恒贡献。他们的描述传达了整个项目的完全不同的特征，既返回了成就，也返回了局限性。实质上，新出现的图景证实了克拉克最初发现的不确定性和复杂性:没有发生从“资本下劳动的包容”到“熟悉的阶级冲突模式”的线性发展。相反，随着劳动力退化和重组，越来越多的劳工抗议随之而来，一个强大的国家成为新自由主义和工人抵抗之间对峙的仲裁者。
{"title":"Sociology, labour and transition in post-Soviet Russia: A view from within","authors":"Claudio Morrison, P. Bizyukov, V. Ilyin, I. Kozina, L. Petrova","doi":"10.1177/03098168231171814","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168231171814","url":null,"abstract":"For almost 20 years, since the early 1990s, Professor Simon Clarke led multiple international research projects in Russia, China and Vietnam studying labour relations, enterprise restructuring and household economics under post-socialist transition. Breaking out of post-socialist scholarship’s narrow confines, both social and ideological, he led an exploration of the void opened by former Soviet Union disintegration reconnecting with those who brought the brunt of it. Equally unique among western scholars was his promotion of a vast network of former Soviet Union researchers and activists, later formalised in the Institute for Comparative Research in Labour Relations. Here, for the first time, some of its leading scholars reflect on his legacy, methods and ever-lasting contribution to the advancement of sociology and social activism in Russia. Their accounts convey the radically alternative character of the overall project, returning both achievements and limitations. In substantive terms, the emerging picture confirms the indeterminacy and complexity of Clarke’s original findings: no linear development from ‘the subsumption of labour under capital’ to ‘familiar patterns of class conflict’ has occurred. Instead, growing labour protests follow labour degradation and restructuring, a strong state becoming the arbiter in the stand-off between neoliberalism and workers’ resistance.","PeriodicalId":46258,"journal":{"name":"Capital and Class","volume":"47 1","pages":"211 - 217"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83568766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-18DOI: 10.1177/03098168231171805
R. Pascual, Luciana Ghiotto
Simon Clarke left an invaluable critical mark on Marxism. Despite his magnanimous work, he is relatively unknown in Latin America because very few texts have been translated into Spanish. We focus on Clarke’s vision and theory of the state, which is of fundamental importance to research in Latin America. First, we focus on his comprehension of the class struggle category to understand the capitalist state’s emergence. Second, we show the importance of his analysis of the subordination of the state and civil society to the rule of money and law. Third, we emphasise his particular way of understanding the social relations of production, which results in his incisive critique of structuralism and the regulation school. Finally, we point out that his understanding of the social relations of production led to a specific way of understanding Marxism that is ‘Simon Clarke’s Marxism’.
{"title":"Simon Clarke’s Marxism and Latin America","authors":"R. Pascual, Luciana Ghiotto","doi":"10.1177/03098168231171805","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168231171805","url":null,"abstract":"Simon Clarke left an invaluable critical mark on Marxism. Despite his magnanimous work, he is relatively unknown in Latin America because very few texts have been translated into Spanish. We focus on Clarke’s vision and theory of the state, which is of fundamental importance to research in Latin America. First, we focus on his comprehension of the class struggle category to understand the capitalist state’s emergence. Second, we show the importance of his analysis of the subordination of the state and civil society to the rule of money and law. Third, we emphasise his particular way of understanding the social relations of production, which results in his incisive critique of structuralism and the regulation school. Finally, we point out that his understanding of the social relations of production led to a specific way of understanding Marxism that is ‘Simon Clarke’s Marxism’.","PeriodicalId":46258,"journal":{"name":"Capital and Class","volume":"37 1","pages":"195 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78550799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In this interview with Hugo Radice, John Holloway and Sol Picciotto (early Conference of Socialist Economists (CSE) members) conducted by Edith González, Panagiotis Doulos and Milena Rodríguez Aza (postdoctoral and PhD students from the Benemérita Autonomous University of Puebla, Mexico), we find a reflection on the CSE early days and a recalling of significant debates among CSE members exploring their relevance today. Above all, Clarke’s CSE fellows tell us what it meant to be a socialist economist working together with Simon Clarke.
{"title":"The CSE and Simon’s Clarke legacy: An interview with John Holloway, Sol Picciotto and Hugo Radice","authors":"Edith González Cruz, Panagiotis Doulos, Milena Rodríguez Aza","doi":"10.1177/03098168231171783","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168231171783","url":null,"abstract":"In this interview with Hugo Radice, John Holloway and Sol Picciotto (early Conference of Socialist Economists (CSE) members) conducted by Edith González, Panagiotis Doulos and Milena Rodríguez Aza (postdoctoral and PhD students from the Benemérita Autonomous University of Puebla, Mexico), we find a reflection on the CSE early days and a recalling of significant debates among CSE members exploring their relevance today. Above all, Clarke’s CSE fellows tell us what it meant to be a socialist economist working together with Simon Clarke.","PeriodicalId":46258,"journal":{"name":"Capital and Class","volume":"26 1","pages":"165 - 175"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86693929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-18DOI: 10.1177/03098168231171817
Gregory Schwartz
Simon Clarke played an unrivalled role in the intellectual trajectory of his former students and significantly shaped the research and the field of sociology in post-Soviet Russia. While his work appears comprised of two distinct lines of inquiry, the essential unity of Simon’s intellectual project may be appreciated by zooming in on the factors that motivated the entirety of his work, such as ethical orientation and a desire to understand the mediations of social relations and tensions between capitalism and freedom, autonomy, self-determination and dignity. Whether studying the political economy of ‘post-Fordist’ global capitalism, the class composition of post-colonial South Africa, the development of workers’ movements in post-socialist states, or the relationship between capital as a social relation and the state as a form of contradictory expression of its class character constituted through struggle, there is a unity of purpose in Simon’s work. In this article, I reflect on the above through a personal reflection of a former doctoral student.
{"title":"Simon Clarke’s practical–theoretical dialectic and the unity of purpose: A personal reflection","authors":"Gregory Schwartz","doi":"10.1177/03098168231171817","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168231171817","url":null,"abstract":"Simon Clarke played an unrivalled role in the intellectual trajectory of his former students and significantly shaped the research and the field of sociology in post-Soviet Russia. While his work appears comprised of two distinct lines of inquiry, the essential unity of Simon’s intellectual project may be appreciated by zooming in on the factors that motivated the entirety of his work, such as ethical orientation and a desire to understand the mediations of social relations and tensions between capitalism and freedom, autonomy, self-determination and dignity. Whether studying the political economy of ‘post-Fordist’ global capitalism, the class composition of post-colonial South Africa, the development of workers’ movements in post-socialist states, or the relationship between capital as a social relation and the state as a form of contradictory expression of its class character constituted through struggle, there is a unity of purpose in Simon’s work. In this article, I reflect on the above through a personal reflection of a former doctoral student.","PeriodicalId":46258,"journal":{"name":"Capital and Class","volume":"127 1","pages":"219 - 223"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80397912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-18DOI: 10.1177/03098168231171789
P. Burnham, W. Bonefeld, P. Fairbrother
Keynesianism, Monetarism, and the Crisis of the State is perhaps Simon’s greatest intellectual and political contribution. This article sets the book in the context of his teaching at Warwick and the development of his thought through Marx, Marginalism and Modern Sociology to the publication of Keynesianism. Building on his analysis of the ideological dimensions of classical political economy, Simon set himself the ambitious task of grasping the coherence and complexity of the relationship between economics, politics and ideology in the crisis-ridden development of capitalism. In so doing, he developed a work of immense significance fusing conceptual and empirical analysis to produce a devastating critique of social democracy, neoliberalism and reformism. Although read widely within Conference of Socialist Economists circles, Keynesianism has not achieved the recognition it clearly deserves. Post-Keynesianism, Simon extended his analysis to worker organisation in Russia and beyond. His theoretical and empirical work on capitalism in all its forms offers a unique and enduring contribution to everyone interested in socialism and the limits of reform.
凯恩斯主义、货币主义和国家危机也许是西蒙最伟大的思想和政治贡献。本文将这本书放在他在华威大学的教学背景下，以及他的思想从马克思、边际主义和现代社会学发展到凯恩斯主义的出版。在对古典政治经济学的意识形态维度进行分析的基础上，西蒙为自己设定了一个雄心勃勃的任务，即在危机重重的资本主义发展中把握经济、政治和意识形态之间关系的一致性和复杂性。在此过程中，他将概念分析和实证分析融合在一起，对社会民主主义、新自由主义和改良主义进行了毁灭性的批判。尽管凯恩斯主义在社会主义经济学家会议(Conference of Socialist Economists)的圈子里广为流传，但它并没有获得它显然应得的认可。后凯恩斯主义时代，西蒙将他的分析扩展到俄罗斯和其他国家的工人组织。他对各种形式的资本主义的理论和实证研究，为所有对社会主义和改革的局限性感兴趣的人提供了独特而持久的贡献。
{"title":"Ideology, political economy and the crisis of the capitalist state","authors":"P. Burnham, W. Bonefeld, P. Fairbrother","doi":"10.1177/03098168231171789","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168231171789","url":null,"abstract":"Keynesianism, Monetarism, and the Crisis of the State is perhaps Simon’s greatest intellectual and political contribution. This article sets the book in the context of his teaching at Warwick and the development of his thought through Marx, Marginalism and Modern Sociology to the publication of Keynesianism. Building on his analysis of the ideological dimensions of classical political economy, Simon set himself the ambitious task of grasping the coherence and complexity of the relationship between economics, politics and ideology in the crisis-ridden development of capitalism. In so doing, he developed a work of immense significance fusing conceptual and empirical analysis to produce a devastating critique of social democracy, neoliberalism and reformism. Although read widely within Conference of Socialist Economists circles, Keynesianism has not achieved the recognition it clearly deserves. Post-Keynesianism, Simon extended his analysis to worker organisation in Russia and beyond. His theoretical and empirical work on capitalism in all its forms offers a unique and enduring contribution to everyone interested in socialism and the limits of reform.","PeriodicalId":46258,"journal":{"name":"Capital and Class","volume":"48 1","pages":"183 - 188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88083555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-29DOI: 10.1177/03098168231171786
G. Charnock, G. Starosta
Simon Clarke was an original and consistent Marxist thinker. From an early stage in his career, he independently developed a cogent, non-dogmatic reading of Marx’s work that ran against the grain of the dominant variants of Marx of his day. In this piece, we delineate the main features of Clarke’s Marxism through a reading of an early essay, first drafted in 1970. We highlight his critique of ideology, his focus on the forms through which the social relations of production appear and his insistence on the unity of theory and history – the conviction that the class struggle is expressed in the concrete movement of history. These features would form the bedrock of his truly significant contribution over five decades.
{"title":"‘If “Marxists” would only read Marx’: The significance of Simon Clarke’s Marxism","authors":"G. Charnock, G. Starosta","doi":"10.1177/03098168231171786","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168231171786","url":null,"abstract":"Simon Clarke was an original and consistent Marxist thinker. From an early stage in his career, he independently developed a cogent, non-dogmatic reading of Marx’s work that ran against the grain of the dominant variants of Marx of his day. In this piece, we delineate the main features of Clarke’s Marxism through a reading of an early essay, first drafted in 1970. We highlight his critique of ideology, his focus on the forms through which the social relations of production appear and his insistence on the unity of theory and history – the conviction that the class struggle is expressed in the concrete movement of history. These features would form the bedrock of his truly significant contribution over five decades.","PeriodicalId":46258,"journal":{"name":"Capital and Class","volume":"1 1","pages":"177 - 181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89806619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-29DOI: 10.1177/03098168231171818
Ana Cecilia Dinerstein
In this brief Afterword, I bring E. A. Poe’s poem The Raven (1845) as a way to say goodbye to Simon
在这篇简短的后记中，我以爱伦·坡的诗《乌鸦》(1845)作为对西蒙的告别
{"title":"Afterword: From nevermore to evermore","authors":"Ana Cecilia Dinerstein","doi":"10.1177/03098168231171818","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168231171818","url":null,"abstract":"In this brief Afterword, I bring E. A. Poe’s poem The Raven (1845) as a way to say goodbye to Simon","PeriodicalId":46258,"journal":{"name":"Capital and Class","volume":"51 1","pages":"225 - 226"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2023-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88316113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：