Pub Date : 2023-01-27DOI: 10.1080/00131946.2023.2169694
Erin Dyke
Abstract This study examines the collective labor of imagining one educational world among myself and six middle-income, racially- and gender-diverse six- and seven year-olds via a two-year critical participatory ethnography of a six-family (including my own) pandemic cooperative—Fake School, as the kids playfully named it. Fake School was initially a semester-long temporary stopgap to arrange shared childcare amid remote learning that became a two-year collective project through the uncertainties and surges of the pandemic. Drawing on Stallybrass and White, I use carnival as an analytic to explore the verticalist imaginary of the education-based mode of study. I seek to narrate our Fake School situated within the broader context of the predominating notions of normalcy that delimit possible futures for public education. I suggest that the emergent educational world we briefly created offers important insights for authorizing young children’s perspectives on the future of education.
{"title":"Carnival and the Fake School: Transgressing the Vertical Imaginary of Education with and for Young Children","authors":"Erin Dyke","doi":"10.1080/00131946.2023.2169694","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2023.2169694","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study examines the collective labor of imagining one educational world among myself and six middle-income, racially- and gender-diverse six- and seven year-olds via a two-year critical participatory ethnography of a six-family (including my own) pandemic cooperative—Fake School, as the kids playfully named it. Fake School was initially a semester-long temporary stopgap to arrange shared childcare amid remote learning that became a two-year collective project through the uncertainties and surges of the pandemic. Drawing on Stallybrass and White, I use carnival as an analytic to explore the verticalist imaginary of the education-based mode of study. I seek to narrate our Fake School situated within the broader context of the predominating notions of normalcy that delimit possible futures for public education. I suggest that the emergent educational world we briefly created offers important insights for authorizing young children’s perspectives on the future of education.","PeriodicalId":46285,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies-AESA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48068741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-25DOI: 10.1080/00131946.2023.2169693
Briana M. Bivens
Abstract In this article, I position federal policy as a shaper of familial life capable of capacitating new forms of relationality. I review three key child and family provisions in the Build Back Better social policy package proposed by the Biden administration: the expanded child tax credit, universal pre-K, and the expansion of federal childcare subsidies. I trace the sociopolitical context surrounding Biden’s endorsement of these child and family care provisions, highlighting how socialist and abolitionist organizing and the COVID-19 pandemic functioned as twin possibility-making forces, thrusting social democratic federal policy onto the agenda of arguably the most moderate Democratic candidate in the 2020 presidential primary. I argue that these social policies have the ontological capacity to shape an image of care and belonging that challenges the nuclear family form and neoliberal discursive productions of care, advancing more just, collective, and relational notions of responsibility and carework.
{"title":"Federal Care Policy Possibilities in the 117th Congress: Toward Expansive Kinship and Collectivized Carework","authors":"Briana M. Bivens","doi":"10.1080/00131946.2023.2169693","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2023.2169693","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, I position federal policy as a shaper of familial life capable of capacitating new forms of relationality. I review three key child and family provisions in the Build Back Better social policy package proposed by the Biden administration: the expanded child tax credit, universal pre-K, and the expansion of federal childcare subsidies. I trace the sociopolitical context surrounding Biden’s endorsement of these child and family care provisions, highlighting how socialist and abolitionist organizing and the COVID-19 pandemic functioned as twin possibility-making forces, thrusting social democratic federal policy onto the agenda of arguably the most moderate Democratic candidate in the 2020 presidential primary. I argue that these social policies have the ontological capacity to shape an image of care and belonging that challenges the nuclear family form and neoliberal discursive productions of care, advancing more just, collective, and relational notions of responsibility and carework.","PeriodicalId":46285,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies-AESA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48121396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-24DOI: 10.1080/00131946.2023.2165924
Larissa Malone, Vilma Seeberg, Xiaoqi Yu
Abstract Building upon literature that has shown that Black students hold definitive beliefs about their teachers’ expectations and knowing these notions have impact on Black student achievement, we explore the experiences within a school district where diversity and inclusion efforts have been ongoing. The participants of this study were high-achieving students and their parents, a nuance that provides depth to understanding Black families’ perceptions of teacher expectations. Critical Race Theory (CRT) served as the theoretical framework and the tenets of permanence of racism, interest convergence, critique of liberalism, and whiteness as property, were employed as categorical themes to centralize the focus on how the families made meaning of their educational experiences through a CRT lens. Findings revealed that the participants were subject to unjust, low expectations that created and maintained a racial hierarchy and an anti-Black ideation on the part of teachers and school authorities. Implications include the need for teachers to raise their awareness of how their actions are interpreted, their role in creating a culture of mistrust, and the need to counter individual level and institutional racialized structures.
{"title":"“The Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations”: Perceptions of Teacher Expectations Among Black Families in a Suburban School","authors":"Larissa Malone, Vilma Seeberg, Xiaoqi Yu","doi":"10.1080/00131946.2023.2165924","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2023.2165924","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Building upon literature that has shown that Black students hold definitive beliefs about their teachers’ expectations and knowing these notions have impact on Black student achievement, we explore the experiences within a school district where diversity and inclusion efforts have been ongoing. The participants of this study were high-achieving students and their parents, a nuance that provides depth to understanding Black families’ perceptions of teacher expectations. Critical Race Theory (CRT) served as the theoretical framework and the tenets of permanence of racism, interest convergence, critique of liberalism, and whiteness as property, were employed as categorical themes to centralize the focus on how the families made meaning of their educational experiences through a CRT lens. Findings revealed that the participants were subject to unjust, low expectations that created and maintained a racial hierarchy and an anti-Black ideation on the part of teachers and school authorities. Implications include the need for teachers to raise their awareness of how their actions are interpreted, their role in creating a culture of mistrust, and the need to counter individual level and institutional racialized structures.","PeriodicalId":46285,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies-AESA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49019941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-20DOI: 10.1080/00131946.2023.2165925
Tamirat Gibon Ginja, Xiaoduan Chen
Abstract Although there is an increasing number of middle schools establishing English immersion programs, teachers are not well-understood immersion and its application, as educators would hope them to do. Inadequate attention is paid to how teachers teach, how in-service training influences their understanding, and their practice of teaching. There is a pressing need to address these issues. This study is a mixed research design aimed at exploring selected in-service teachers’ understanding of English immersion, and their experiences. Data were obtained through a questionnaire, in-depth individual interviews, classroom observation, and post-observation discussion. The findings indicate there was confusion about content teaching vs. English teaching, and sometimes a failure to understand why teaching content in English was necessitated. The novice teachers have more irregularities between their understanding and practices. Factors, such as insufficiencies of in-service training, lacking time for planning and exposure to English practising activities; and absence of a policy framework and inadequate support, were identified as the cause for less success of the English immersion program. Implications are discussed, and suggestions for future studies are provided.
{"title":"Exploring Middle School Teachers’ Understanding of English Immersion and Their Instructional Practices in Xi’an, China","authors":"Tamirat Gibon Ginja, Xiaoduan Chen","doi":"10.1080/00131946.2023.2165925","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2023.2165925","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although there is an increasing number of middle schools establishing English immersion programs, teachers are not well-understood immersion and its application, as educators would hope them to do. Inadequate attention is paid to how teachers teach, how in-service training influences their understanding, and their practice of teaching. There is a pressing need to address these issues. This study is a mixed research design aimed at exploring selected in-service teachers’ understanding of English immersion, and their experiences. Data were obtained through a questionnaire, in-depth individual interviews, classroom observation, and post-observation discussion. The findings indicate there was confusion about content teaching vs. English teaching, and sometimes a failure to understand why teaching content in English was necessitated. The novice teachers have more irregularities between their understanding and practices. Factors, such as insufficiencies of in-service training, lacking time for planning and exposure to English practising activities; and absence of a policy framework and inadequate support, were identified as the cause for less success of the English immersion program. Implications are discussed, and suggestions for future studies are provided.","PeriodicalId":46285,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies-AESA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44151073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/00131946.2023.2165079
Andrea Bennett-Kinne, Brian D. Schultz
{"title":"You Are Your Own Best Teacher! Sparking the Curiosity, Imagination and Intellect of Tweens.","authors":"Andrea Bennett-Kinne, Brian D. Schultz","doi":"10.1080/00131946.2023.2165079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2023.2165079","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46285,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies-AESA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45977694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/00131946.2022.2079089
Becky M. Atkinson, Bradley Toland
Abstract Expanding globalization and the recent nationalistic backlash in the West presents a pedagogical threshold of opportunity for inquiry and transformation. We explore how these movements are pedagogical from the philosophical perspective of feminist pragmatism informed by the logic of home, a Native philosophical and political perspective. This offers a significant contribution to the conversations surrounding social democracy and political transformation to education as well as educational inquiry characterized by dialogue, social justice, civility, equity, and growth. Specifically, in this paper we examine the logic of home as presented in the life experiences and work of Lydia Child, an early 19th century American journalist, abolitionist, and ancestor to the women’s rights movement, and Jane Addams, prominent and influential 19th century interdisciplinary feminist pragmatist, and global leader in the early in the women’s rights and peace movements. We forward feminist pragmatism as a relevant empowering and educative framework for philosophical reasoning and political activism, especially when materialized in the lives of Child and Addams.
{"title":"Logic of Home: Resistance and Logic in Post-Truth Times","authors":"Becky M. Atkinson, Bradley Toland","doi":"10.1080/00131946.2022.2079089","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2022.2079089","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Expanding globalization and the recent nationalistic backlash in the West presents a pedagogical threshold of opportunity for inquiry and transformation. We explore how these movements are pedagogical from the philosophical perspective of feminist pragmatism informed by the logic of home, a Native philosophical and political perspective. This offers a significant contribution to the conversations surrounding social democracy and political transformation to education as well as educational inquiry characterized by dialogue, social justice, civility, equity, and growth. Specifically, in this paper we examine the logic of home as presented in the life experiences and work of Lydia Child, an early 19th century American journalist, abolitionist, and ancestor to the women’s rights movement, and Jane Addams, prominent and influential 19th century interdisciplinary feminist pragmatist, and global leader in the early in the women’s rights and peace movements. We forward feminist pragmatism as a relevant empowering and educative framework for philosophical reasoning and political activism, especially when materialized in the lives of Child and Addams.","PeriodicalId":46285,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies-AESA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41738830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/00131946.2022.2153683
Lina Sun
Abstract This paper explores critical cosmopolitan literacies as a framework to engage teacher preparation program candidates in re-conceptualizing about their work as active thinkers, ethical decision makers, and agentive global actors. The purpose of the study is to elucidate how preservice teachers, in a secondary literacy teacher education program, respond to ethics-oriented education in addressing complex and controversial sociopolitical issues, such as the dialectics of freedom, human rights, and growing racism in the neoliberal globalized context. The third space theory of ethics is used to interpret participant student teachers’ intellectual epistemology based on their engagement with literary and nonliterary works, as well as multicultural media products. Data consist of observations, discussions, focus-group interviews, reflective journals, and course evaluations. This study contributes to our understanding of how critical cosmopolitan literacies is situated in the intercultural dialogue pertaining to ethical and equitable decision-making as a promising professional enterprise in the preparation of literacy educators as global advocates for equity and social justice.
{"title":"Enacting Critical Cosmopolitanism in Suburban Preservice Teacher Education through Crafting a Pedagogical Third-Space of Ethics","authors":"Lina Sun","doi":"10.1080/00131946.2022.2153683","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2022.2153683","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper explores critical cosmopolitan literacies as a framework to engage teacher preparation program candidates in re-conceptualizing about their work as active thinkers, ethical decision makers, and agentive global actors. The purpose of the study is to elucidate how preservice teachers, in a secondary literacy teacher education program, respond to ethics-oriented education in addressing complex and controversial sociopolitical issues, such as the dialectics of freedom, human rights, and growing racism in the neoliberal globalized context. The third space theory of ethics is used to interpret participant student teachers’ intellectual epistemology based on their engagement with literary and nonliterary works, as well as multicultural media products. Data consist of observations, discussions, focus-group interviews, reflective journals, and course evaluations. This study contributes to our understanding of how critical cosmopolitan literacies is situated in the intercultural dialogue pertaining to ethical and equitable decision-making as a promising professional enterprise in the preparation of literacy educators as global advocates for equity and social justice.","PeriodicalId":46285,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies-AESA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44991070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-19DOI: 10.1080/00131946.2022.2153685
Jing Sun
Abstract In my inquiry, I explore Chinese urban youth culture under the one-child policy through analyses of two Chinese Internet subcultural artifacts—A Bloody Case of a Steamed Bun and Du Fu Is Busy. Using Douglas Kellner’s multiperspectival cultural studies (i.e., cultural studies, critical theory, and critical media literacy) as the theoretical framework, and diagnostic critique and semiotics as the analytical method, I examine three general themes—resistance, power relations, and consumerism. The power of multiperspectival cultural studies, an interdisciplinary inquiry, lies in its potentials to explore Chinese urban youth culture under the one-child policy from multiple perspectives; explore historical backgrounds and complexity of cultural artifacts to understand contradictions and trajectories of Chinese urban youth culture; recognize alternative medias as a space for urban Chinese youth to express frustrations and dissatisfactions, to challenge social injustices, and to create dreams and hopes for their futures; recognize that the intertexuality among cultural artifacts and subcultures creates possibilities for Chinese urban youth to invent more alternative media cultures that empower them to challenge dominations, perform their identities, and release their imagination for the future; invite Chinese youth to be the change agents for the era but not to be imprisoned by the era; and overcome misunderstanding, misrepresentation, or underrepresentation of Chinese urban youth cultural texts to promote linguistic and cultural diversity in a multicultural, multilingual, and multiracial world.
{"title":"Urban Youth Culture Under the One-Child Policy in China: A Multiperspectival Cultural Studies of Internet Subcultures","authors":"Jing Sun","doi":"10.1080/00131946.2022.2153685","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2022.2153685","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In my inquiry, I explore Chinese urban youth culture under the one-child policy through analyses of two Chinese Internet subcultural artifacts—A Bloody Case of a Steamed Bun and Du Fu Is Busy. Using Douglas Kellner’s multiperspectival cultural studies (i.e., cultural studies, critical theory, and critical media literacy) as the theoretical framework, and diagnostic critique and semiotics as the analytical method, I examine three general themes—resistance, power relations, and consumerism. The power of multiperspectival cultural studies, an interdisciplinary inquiry, lies in its potentials to explore Chinese urban youth culture under the one-child policy from multiple perspectives; explore historical backgrounds and complexity of cultural artifacts to understand contradictions and trajectories of Chinese urban youth culture; recognize alternative medias as a space for urban Chinese youth to express frustrations and dissatisfactions, to challenge social injustices, and to create dreams and hopes for their futures; recognize that the intertexuality among cultural artifacts and subcultures creates possibilities for Chinese urban youth to invent more alternative media cultures that empower them to challenge dominations, perform their identities, and release their imagination for the future; invite Chinese youth to be the change agents for the era but not to be imprisoned by the era; and overcome misunderstanding, misrepresentation, or underrepresentation of Chinese urban youth cultural texts to promote linguistic and cultural diversity in a multicultural, multilingual, and multiracial world.","PeriodicalId":46285,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies-AESA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41261098","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-13DOI: 10.1080/00131946.2022.2153684
Jennifer Esposito
Abstract Leadership roles in higher education are still held predominately by white male leaders while women of color, especially, struggle to be recognized, hired, and/or appointed as leaders. In popular culture, though there have been films and television series that focus on student life on campus, there have been few representations of life as a leader in higher education. A new six-episode Netflix series, The Chair, about the first woman of color department chair at a liberal arts college examines issues of sexism and racism but doesn’t allow for a harsh enough critique of the insidious ways the institution continues to repress women, especially women of color. I engage in an intersectional analysis of the series’ representations of a department chair and argue that, while masquerading as a transformative representation, the series actually reifies the ideology of the academy (namely white supremacy and heteropatriarchy) and illustrates the ways progressive change is resisted by institutional powerbrokers holding upper-level managerial roles in the college.
{"title":"“It’s Not Enough to Just Insert a Few People of Color:” An Intersectional Analysis of Failed Leadership in Netflix’s The Chair Series","authors":"Jennifer Esposito","doi":"10.1080/00131946.2022.2153684","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2022.2153684","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Leadership roles in higher education are still held predominately by white male leaders while women of color, especially, struggle to be recognized, hired, and/or appointed as leaders. In popular culture, though there have been films and television series that focus on student life on campus, there have been few representations of life as a leader in higher education. A new six-episode Netflix series, The Chair, about the first woman of color department chair at a liberal arts college examines issues of sexism and racism but doesn’t allow for a harsh enough critique of the insidious ways the institution continues to repress women, especially women of color. I engage in an intersectional analysis of the series’ representations of a department chair and argue that, while masquerading as a transformative representation, the series actually reifies the ideology of the academy (namely white supremacy and heteropatriarchy) and illustrates the ways progressive change is resisted by institutional powerbrokers holding upper-level managerial roles in the college.","PeriodicalId":46285,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies-AESA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48719724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-08DOI: 10.1080/00131946.2022.2153682
Beth Douthirt-Cohen, Tomoko Tokunaga, T. McGuire, Hana Zewdie
Abstract Over the past 25 years, educators and activists have used ally development models to emphasize how someone with privilege can enact solidarity across identity differences. Conceptualizing how people develop into “allies,” is even more pressing in the aftermath of the largest racial justice protests in recorded US history with concerns about how and if the momentum toward justice will be maintained. These models place a spotlight on “allyship” as a form of solidarity that could interrupt oppression and further justice. However, these ally development models can also limit imagining solidarity across identity, power, and privilege differentials especially in the context of ongoing violence and brutal dehumanization. Some limitations include a reinforcement of binary thinking about identity and a false sense of a linear process of becoming and being an “ally.” In order to expand current and strengthen future “ally” models, this article is an attempt to begin a discourse between these development models and some of the conceptualizations of identity and solidarity that come from borderland theories in the field of postcolonial cultural studies. These theories conceptualize identity and encounters across difference in a nuanced and culturally complex way, which can lead to the development of a more informed, sustainable, ethical, and accountable solidarity.
{"title":"Pitfalls and Possibilities of Social Justice Ally Development Models: Lessons From Borderland Theories for Building Solidarity Across Difference","authors":"Beth Douthirt-Cohen, Tomoko Tokunaga, T. McGuire, Hana Zewdie","doi":"10.1080/00131946.2022.2153682","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2022.2153682","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Over the past 25 years, educators and activists have used ally development models to emphasize how someone with privilege can enact solidarity across identity differences. Conceptualizing how people develop into “allies,” is even more pressing in the aftermath of the largest racial justice protests in recorded US history with concerns about how and if the momentum toward justice will be maintained. These models place a spotlight on “allyship” as a form of solidarity that could interrupt oppression and further justice. However, these ally development models can also limit imagining solidarity across identity, power, and privilege differentials especially in the context of ongoing violence and brutal dehumanization. Some limitations include a reinforcement of binary thinking about identity and a false sense of a linear process of becoming and being an “ally.” In order to expand current and strengthen future “ally” models, this article is an attempt to begin a discourse between these development models and some of the conceptualizations of identity and solidarity that come from borderland theories in the field of postcolonial cultural studies. These theories conceptualize identity and encounters across difference in a nuanced and culturally complex way, which can lead to the development of a more informed, sustainable, ethical, and accountable solidarity.","PeriodicalId":46285,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies-AESA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44289167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：