Education for Primary Care最新文献

GP educationalists are crucial in training the future medical workforce and in developing and advancing the field of primary care medical education, yet opportunities in the UK are patchy and varied. In this article, a group of GP educationalists summarise the challenges facing the sustainability of this particular group of clinical academics and outline opportunities available at each career stage, from medical students through to senior GP educationalists. Recommendations to support the growth of this workforce include the development of a nationally recognised framework for GP educationalist careers, collaboration with professional and educational bodies and taking steps to level out opportunities in order to reduce existing inequity.

Exposing medical student cohorts to the lived reality of uncertainty and complexity experienced by GPs is challenging to achieve. We present a novel teaching concept: 'Challenge GP' designed for early years students. Gamification methodology is used to reproduce key elements of the 'duty GP' experience in a classroom setting where working in teams, students play a competitive card game. Cards drawn at random pose scenarios based on practical, logistical, and ethical dilemmas of a duty doctor surgery. Each team discusses whether to score by reporting a decision or play special cards to pass the dilemma onto, or collaborate with, another team. Answers are facilitated and scored by a GP tutor.Student feedback demonstrated highly effective learning for clinical reasoning, risk management and problem-solving. Students were exposed to the uncertainty and complexity of real-life medicine. Gamification, through competitiveness, increased task engagement. Students learned the value of working in teams under time pressure and grew in confidence by sharing knowledge in a safe environment. Students were enabled to think, feel and practise as real-life clinicians. This became a powerful force in contextualising their theory-based knowledge, aided understanding of the GP role and opened their eyes to a possible career in general practice.

Background: The Irish General Practitioner Training (GP) Programme is currently moving to Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME), facilitated by Programmatic Assessment (PA) and Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs). These new assessment and feedback mechanisms may provide a rich and much sought-after dataset. However, given the possible number of feedback and assessment events, and the variety of modalities used, aggregating and interpreting these can be costly and difficult. Dashboard implementations (DI) have been purposed as a solution to bridge the gap between the large datasets and the training community at all levels.

Aims: To explore the Irish GP training community's perceptions on how an EPAs DI could facilitate the delivery of GP training in Ireland.

Methods: A qualitative approach was taken, using a focus group representative of different groups in the training community. Concurrently, an EPAs DI was developed. Focus group transcripts were analysed in an iterative fashion using Template Analysis to generate themes and subthemes.

Results: Numerous advantages were seen in relation to the implementation of an EPAs DI around entrustment decisions, constructive alignment and summative decision-making. These advantages, however, need to be tempered with the realisation that the EPAs DI is not and should not be misinterpreted as being the learning analytic panacea for GP training.

Conclusion: This paper outlines the perceptions from a postgraduate medical education training community on an EPAs DI, which would be applicable to other training communities considering introducing similar mechanisms.

The GP consultation is a fluid, complex interaction that is difficult to define, but points can be identified where the consultation can run smoothly, or rapidly derail and become dysfunctional. In teaching communication skills we can help trainees to recognise these 'pinch points' and to equip them with the tools to successfully navigate the challenges they present. This paper uses the concept of the Two Houses model for the consultation to explore three such pinch points: Keeping the consultation dance going; how 'need' is a power word and should be used with caution; and the value of considering whether the patient is looking for a better understanding of their problem, or a solution, or both. Seeing the consultation as like a dance between doctor and patient can help illustrate the importance of the doctor and patient working together, and for the doctor to be alert to cues that the 'dancers' are drifting apart. The skills needed to keep the dance going throughout the consultation are considered. The perils of telling the patient that they 'don't need' something they believe they do need are explored within the concept of encountering an 'empty room' in the Two Houses model, while the distinction between gaining understanding and seeking a solution is illustrated by considering the Two Wings of the House of Decision within the model.

The article considers the impact of a virtual walk on the peer appraisal process and highlights the potential focus on professional well being and organisational connectedness.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the decisions and decision-making strategies employed by academic GPs tasked with adapting the delivery of undergraduate general practice education curricula to virtual platforms during the Covid-19 pandemic. We sought to investigate how their experiences of this adaptation might influence the development of future curricula.

Methods: Recognising our 'insider' positions and constructivist paradigm preferences, we approached the study from a constructivist grounded theory (CGT) perspective and participants participated in semi-structured interviews.

Results: Nine participants from three university GP departments in Ireland described the transition to online delivery of the curriculum as a 'response approach'. Participants described seeking collaboration both within and between institutions. The value and limitations of student feedback as a driver for change differed between participants and recognised the impact of limited social engagement between peers on social determinants of learning. Participants with prior experience in e-learning were inclined to recommend some level of continuation. Two institutions plan to continue to incorporate aspects of blended learning.

Conclusion and implications: All participants recognised a level of value (efficiency, social engagement and continuity) in online learning, they were less clear on the specific educational value and impact of this (e.g. on knowledge, skills and attributes). We need to consider which elements of undergraduate education can be delivered effectively online. Maintaining the socio-cultural learning environment is of critical importance but must be balanced by efficient, informed and strategic educational design.

Background: Given the increasing complexity of tasks transferred to primary care, discipline-specific educational opportunities are required for those working within this context. Simulation-based training (SBT) is widely applied within a hospital setting, underpinned by extensive research. However, little is known about the transfer of simulations' utility to primary care. This systematic review sought to determine which SBT approaches are adopted for continuing professional development within primary care and appraise their impact.

Methods: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science databases were searched, with additional articles obtained through secondary searching. Eligible studies employed and evaluated a simulation-based educational intervention for fully qualified healthcare professionals, working within primary care. Included studies were quality assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (v18) and their findings narratively synthesised.

Results: Forty-nine studies were included, sampling 4,601 primary care health professionals. Studies primarily adopted a quantitative design and demonstrated variable quality. Simulation approaches comprised standardised patients (n = 21), role-play (n = 14), virtual (n = 6), manikin (n = 5) and mixed manikin/standardised patients (n = 3). Efficacy was evaluated across Kirkpatrick levels and demonstrated a positive impact for knowledge-, skills- and attitude-based outcomes, though this was limited in select studies.

Discussion: SBT has been adopted in the education of the spectrum of health professionals working within primary care, with the most common approach being standardised patients. Simulation delivers an acceptable and effective educational method, demonstrating a positive impact across various learning objectives. Further research assessing the impact at an organisational- and patient-level is required.