Education for Primary Care最新文献

Background: Recorded consultations are a useful tool for developing consultation skills for general practice speciality trainees (GPSTs). Historical barriers to utility include a lack of recording equipment and trainee discomfort. Widespread use of online communication platforms during the pandemic led to the introduction of the Recorded Consultation Assessment (RCA), prompting an exploration of its impact on GPSTs' attitudes and acceptability of using recorded consultations for feedback.

Aim: This sequential explanatory mixed methods study explored attitudes of military GPSTs towards using recorded consultations for feedback to develop consultation skills, and identify factors influencing GPST attitudes.

Methods: Participants of this study completed a questionnaire, followed by a representative sample focus group. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data, reflexive thematic analysis was employed for qualitative data. Triangulation was conducted using a meta-matrix.

Results: Results indicated agreement among respondents on the usefulness of recorded consultations for developing consultation skills, particularly communication skills. Perceived trainer attitudes significantly influence the GPST utility of this tool. The RCA positively impacted attitudes, providing familiarity, free access to easy-to-use online recording platforms, simplified consenting procedures, secure data storage, and improved feedback quality from trainers.

Conclusion: Pre-pandemic studies cited equipment access and consent procedures as barriers to utilising recording as a method of feedback. The pandemic and RCA introduced online resources and imperative to utilise this method, resulting in largely positive GPST learning experiences. As we move away from the RCA it is important to retain institutional memory of the benefits gained from feedback using recorded methods.

June 2023 saw an exceptionally high proportion of Outcome 5s (incomplete evidence) issued at the annual review of competency progression (ARCP) for GP Trainees in Yorkshire and the Humber (Y&H) Deanery. These outcomes created considerable time, administrative and financial costs for the deanery. Additionally, it was believed that receiving non-standard outcomes at ARCP would be detrimental to trainee wellbeing. All GP Trainees in Y&H Deanery who received an Outcome 5 at their ARCP in June 2023 were surveyed. They were asked to report their experience of receiving this outcome with reference to their wellbeing. The survey also sought to understand the reasons for this rise in non-standard outcomes to guide quality improvement work within the deanery. Trainee perspectives revealed through this survey have guided reforms within the deanery to the structure and content of teaching and resources for GP trainees. It is believed these findings may be of similar value to other educators. 47% of eligible trainees responded to the survey. It was significantly reported that receiving an Outcome 5 felt stressful. However, trainees also reported that the time and instruction given upon receiving Outcome 5 was adequate, and they felt well supported by their educational supervisors. Preparation for ARCP was described as a neutral activity. The most frequent causes for receiving Outcome 5 were as follows: accessing and evidencing Basic Life Support (BLS) training, misunderstanding Safeguarding Requirements, incorrectly completing Form R and portfolio evidence not being seen by assessors. Further detail on these issues is described in the report below.

Background: It is common practice for senior medical students in UK General Practice to enter details of their consultations into the electronic patient record (EPR). There is evidence that students benefit educationally from writing in patient records through learning how to make good clinical entries and enhancing their clinical reasoning. In England, since 31 October 2023, patients are given full access to their EPR, including free text notes on their consultations. Despite the importance of high-quality consultation notes, guidance on writing in the patient record is rarely included in medical curricula.

Approach: With patient and public involvement, the UKCCC (UK Council for Clinical Communication in Undergraduate Medical Education) developed a guide for students on writing in patients' General Practice (GP) notes and disseminated it to all UK medical schools from August to October 2023.

Results: The utility of the guide was evaluated via student and GP tutor surveys. Students and clinical teachers valued the guidance on content, structure, and clarity of consultation notes. A lack of awareness of the guide and suboptimal access and formatting on mobile devices were raised as areas for improvement. Other survey responses, which will inform the development of the next version, suggested adding links to learning resources.

Background: Despite commitment across national medical education and training bodies to tackle differential attainment (DA), alongside a wealth of research into contributing factors and solutions, progression in narrowing the gap has lagged. This study explores the lived experiences of doctors facing DA, career progression barriers and their wider consequences.

Methods: Interpretative phenomenological analysis was chosen as the methodological framework. The six doctors interviewed were released from General Practice training before enrolling in a 'targeted' intervention scheme designed to support them with training completion.

Results: The cohort included four international medical graduates and two graduates from the United Kingdom. Three participants were neurodiverse. Three inter-related themes were identified. 1) 'Career insecurity' is defined as uncertainty about career prospects and attainment of career goals. At varying points along their journey navigating through progression barriers, participants frequently questioned their futures and the decision to persist in the arduous pursuit of training completion. 2) 'Psychological injury' featured prominently in the experiences of the 'targeted trainees'. Feelings of worthlessness, helplessness, low energy and mood, and 'traumatic' experiences were described. 3) 'Social injury' illustrates consequences to doctors' familial and social contexts (including relationships), as well as wider societal consequences (such as attrition).

Conclusion: Our research evidences the consequences of DA and career progression barriers. We highlight the urgent need for escalated efforts in addressing the challenges faced by different groups of doctors and narrowing the attainment gap. Recommendations for interventions are included in our study.

Purpose: Widening participation in medicine refers to the recruitment policy of encouraging those who are traditionally under-represented in medical school. Whilst research in the UK has investigated the processes around improving participation through recruitment and selection to medical schools, there is less focus around the period after medical school and how students from widening participation backgrounds fare in the workforce.

Methods: This study employed scoping review methodology to collate, map and summarise research in the field. Basic numerical analysis and thematic analysis were performed on the included studies.

Results: A total of 17 studies were included in this scoping review. The majority of included studies were perspective pieces and cohort studies. There was a paucity of studies reporting around the impact of widening participation of doctors with a disability on the workforce. Four themes emerged from the thematic analysis: (1) promoting diversity; (2) boosting recruitment and retention; (3) improving representation and balance; and (4) perpetuating inequalities.

Conclusions: This scoping review highlighted positive effects on the workforce of widening participation. Efforts should be undertaken to ensure widening participation students do not experience ongoing inequality in their subsequent careers on qualification from medical school. The research field would benefit from further study exploring the impact of disability on the medical workforce, and qualitative enquiry to better investigate the experiences of widening participation students in the workforce.

Background: In the UK, to encourage academic careers, extended education posts (EEPs) exist, where standard three-year, general practice vocational training is extended, offering trainees dedicated time to spend in another specialty such as medical education (Med Ed). Little is known about whether this impacts positively on their subsequent careers.

Aims: To explore general practitioners' (GPs') experiences and career trajectories after undertaking Med Ed EEPs.

Method: Twenty-eight GPs who completed a Med Ed EEP between 2013 and 2021 were invited to participate. Semi-structured interviews were held virtually. Transcripts were coded with NVivo software and underwent thematic analysis using Braun and Clarke's six-phase framework to ensure a reiterative process of internal validation.

Results: Eight GPs took part. All were working as NHS GPs, alongside other roles. Four themes emerged: 'growing as an academic educator', 'research can be interesting', 'the academic environment' and 'juggling multiple roles is stressful'. Most were still teaching, involved in research and had undertaken formal Med Ed training. Role models and immersion in academic teams were influential. Significant tensions and stresses were experienced when balancing multiple roles. The absence of ongoing academic training tracks contributed to this.

Conclusion: EEPs impact positively on academic career development and the acquisition of appropriate skills. However, managing multiple roles is challenging and stressful. Short-term university contracts, difficulties obtaining flexible working and resultant lack of partnership or salaried clinical work highlight an urgent need to explore fixed academic training pathways after vocational training, if sustainable recruitment into primary care academia is to be achieved.

The importance of involving patients in medical education is widely accepted, but their contribution to medical curriculum design is not well documented. Patients have the potential to bring a unique perspective and more refined experience to curriculum development. This applies particularly to those with long-term conditions (LTCs) who have multiple exposures to doctors throughout their healthcare journey. The aim of this study is to explore what views patients with LTCs have on the attributes medical students require to have, in order to provide them with high-quality care. Ten patients with LTCs, encompassing both primary and secondary care over a broad set of demographics, were interviewed by telephone using a semi-structured questionnaire. The interviews were recorded using a digital voice recorder and manually transcribed verbatim onto a Microsoft Word document for thematic analysis using NVIVO software and following Braun and Clarke's six-phase framework. Five themes have emerged highlighting where the care of LTC patients could be improved: 'advocacy'; 'compassion'; 'the desire to be acknowledged as an individual'"; acknowledgement of their expertise"; and 'benefits of continuity of care'. The findings make a major contribution to undergraduate and postgraduate clinical training development. They reinforce themes in healthcare which need more emphasis in the medical curriculum, whilst simultaneously highlighting that even well-recognised concepts such as patient-centred holistic care, are not well implemented in the context of actual practice.