Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-09-24DOI: 10.1177/19433875241288138
Jeffrey S Marschall, Stephen S Davis, Oscar Rysavy, George M Kushner
Study design: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Objective: Reconstruction of maxillary bone defects can be completed with vascularized and non-vascularized autografts. Cellular bone matrix allografts (CBMs), which have lineage committed bone cells, has risen as an alternative. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience and to determine the success of CBM based maxillary reconstruction in a variety of clinical scenarios.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was designed and implemented using data from subjects who presented to the University of Louisville and were treated with a CBM for maxillary reconstruction from 2019 to 2023. Subjects were excluded if they were not treated with a CBM, data were not complete, or postoperative follow-up time was less than 3 months. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each variable. To measure the associations between the risk factors and graft success, Fisher's exact test was implemented. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
Results: The sample included 48 subjects. The mean age of all subjects was 43 ± 24 years. Overall, 42 (87.5%) cases were successful. The perioperative antibiotic administered (P = 0.02), etiology (P = 0.021), and the addition of platelet rich fibrin or autograft as an adjunct influenced CBM success (P = 0.039).
Conclusions: CBMs are a viable option for reconstruction of maxillary bone defects. CBMs may be an alternative to autografts.
{"title":"Reconstruction of Maxillary Bone Defects With Cellular Bone Matrix Allografts.","authors":"Jeffrey S Marschall, Stephen S Davis, Oscar Rysavy, George M Kushner","doi":"10.1177/19433875241288138","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875241288138","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective Cohort Study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Reconstruction of maxillary bone defects can be completed with vascularized and non-vascularized autografts. Cellular bone matrix allografts (CBMs), which have lineage committed bone cells, has risen as an alternative. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience and to determine the success of CBM based maxillary reconstruction in a variety of clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was designed and implemented using data from subjects who presented to the University of Louisville and were treated with a CBM for maxillary reconstruction from 2019 to 2023. Subjects were excluded if they were not treated with a CBM, data were not complete, or postoperative follow-up time was less than 3 months. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each variable. To measure the associations between the risk factors and graft success, Fisher's exact test was implemented. A <i>P</i>-value of <0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 48 subjects. The mean age of all subjects was 43 ± 24 years. Overall, 42 (87.5%) cases were successful. The perioperative antibiotic administered (<i>P</i> = 0.02), etiology (<i>P</i> = 0.021), and the addition of platelet rich fibrin or autograft as an adjunct influenced CBM success (<i>P</i> = 0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CBMs are a viable option for reconstruction of maxillary bone defects. CBMs may be an alternative to autografts.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":" ","pages":"NP263-NP270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559585/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Maxillofacial trauma presenting to the emergency department (ED) are often accompanied with complex concomitant injuries, thereby making thorough diagnosis and treatment plan quite an exacting task owing to the demanding conditions of the ED. The use of a structured maxillofacial trauma template helps in documenting the injuries comprehensively, aids in treatment planning, avoids medical negligence thereby improving the quality of care given to the patient. The study introduced a structured maxillofacial trauma template to improve the quality of the ED documentation.
Methods: A total of 220 patients were evaluated for the quality of their ED documentation from September 2023 till February 2024. The group A included 110 patients where complete medical documentation was done routinely on a blank A4 sized paper, group B included 110 patients where the documentation was done using the structured oral and maxillofacial trauma template. The ED notes were thoroughly evaluated by the 2 independent authors for record completeness and documentation rate of history and examination findings.
Results: The introduction of trauma template demonstrated a significant improvement of 18.95 % in record completeness. Significant improvement was seen in documentation rate among the covariates like place of injury, time of evaluation, primary care given, wound classification, dento-alveolar injury, ophthalmic evaluation, nerve injury evaluation, comorbidities with P = .001, and referral with P = .03. The ophthalmic evaluation showed significant improvement among covariates (loss of visual acuity, reflexes, diplopia, enophthalmos, subconjunctival haemorrhage, chemosis, periorbital oedema, periorbital ecchymosis, ocular dystopia) with P = .001, and extraocular muscle restriction with P = .004.
Conclusions: The study demonstrated that the use of a structured oral and maxillofacial trauma template can significantly improve the quality of the ED documentation and contributes to better patient care in the ED.
{"title":"Effectiveness of a Structured Trauma Template in Improving Clinical Examination Accuracy in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Prospective Study.","authors":"Akhilesh K Pandey, Gigi Pg, Harshitha Rajanna, Abhishek Anil, Pravin Kumar, Ankita Chugh","doi":"10.1177/19433875241272435","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875241272435","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective pre-post study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Maxillofacial trauma presenting to the emergency department (ED) are often accompanied with complex concomitant injuries, thereby making thorough diagnosis and treatment plan quite an exacting task owing to the demanding conditions of the ED. The use of a structured maxillofacial trauma template helps in documenting the injuries comprehensively, aids in treatment planning, avoids medical negligence thereby improving the quality of care given to the patient. The study introduced a structured maxillofacial trauma template to improve the quality of the ED documentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 220 patients were evaluated for the quality of their ED documentation from September 2023 till February 2024. The group A included 110 patients where complete medical documentation was done routinely on a blank A4 sized paper, group B included 110 patients where the documentation was done using the structured oral and maxillofacial trauma template. The ED notes were thoroughly evaluated by the 2 independent authors for record completeness and documentation rate of history and examination findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The introduction of trauma template demonstrated a significant improvement of 18.95 % in record completeness. Significant improvement was seen in documentation rate among the covariates like place of injury, time of evaluation, primary care given, wound classification, dento-alveolar injury, ophthalmic evaluation, nerve injury evaluation, comorbidities with <i>P</i> = .001, and referral with <i>P</i> = .03. The ophthalmic evaluation showed significant improvement among covariates (loss of visual acuity, reflexes, diplopia, enophthalmos, subconjunctival haemorrhage, chemosis, periorbital oedema, periorbital ecchymosis, ocular dystopia) with <i>P</i> = .001, and extraocular muscle restriction with <i>P</i> = .004.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study demonstrated that the use of a structured oral and maxillofacial trauma template can significantly improve the quality of the ED documentation and contributes to better patient care in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":" ","pages":"NP204-NP216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11563012/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-08-27DOI: 10.1177/19433875241278797
Amit Dharamvir Mahajan, Sharvari Prakash Daithankar, Pratesh Nitin Dholabhai, Aniruddh Pratap Singh, Aditya Rajesh Shah, Nirvani Pinkesh Shah
Study design: Submental intubation is and underutilized alternative to traditional techniques of intubation. Complications associated can indeed deter surgeons and anesthesiologist from performing it. Surgeons may opt for submental intubation if they believe that its advantages outweigh the potential risks of the procedure. Identifying the reasons of complications and implementing of proper strategies to address them can help mitigate risks.
Objective: This study aims to compare and analyze the complications experienced during and after submental intubation to comment on its safety, efficacy. Revisiting literature, will help us to comment on diagnosis in trauma and associated perioperative and intraoperative complication with it. It will also help us deduce most preferred way of performing submental intubation and various methods to manage complications.
Methods: Submental intubation in patients experiencing craniofacial trauma was reviewed retrospectively for 9 years from January 2015 to August 2023. Common diagnosis sites were analyzed for perioperative and postoperative complications.
Results: It was found that there were no much complications faced perioperatively and also notes methods used for management of complications. Most commonly encountered postoperative complication was scar. Literature of past years was reviewed, during process we also came out with novel method for safe extubation for which we have got copyright from Government of India.
Conclusions: Submental intubation is a safe and efficient intraoperative airway management technique for patients with craniomaxillofacial injuries when there is concurrent facial trauma. This study findings would underscore the safety and efficacy of SEI, making it a promising unparalleled method of airway management worth considering.
{"title":"Unlocking the Potential of Submental Intubation - Redefining Airway Management in Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Patients.","authors":"Amit Dharamvir Mahajan, Sharvari Prakash Daithankar, Pratesh Nitin Dholabhai, Aniruddh Pratap Singh, Aditya Rajesh Shah, Nirvani Pinkesh Shah","doi":"10.1177/19433875241278797","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875241278797","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Submental intubation is and underutilized alternative to traditional techniques of intubation. Complications associated can indeed deter surgeons and anesthesiologist from performing it. Surgeons may opt for submental intubation if they believe that its advantages outweigh the potential risks of the procedure. Identifying the reasons of complications and implementing of proper strategies to address them can help mitigate risks.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare and analyze the complications experienced during and after submental intubation to comment on its safety, efficacy. Revisiting literature, will help us to comment on diagnosis in trauma and associated perioperative and intraoperative complication with it. It will also help us deduce most preferred way of performing submental intubation and various methods to manage complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Submental intubation in patients experiencing craniofacial trauma was reviewed retrospectively for 9 years from January 2015 to August 2023. Common diagnosis sites were analyzed for perioperative and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was found that there were no much complications faced perioperatively and also notes methods used for management of complications. Most commonly encountered postoperative complication was scar. Literature of past years was reviewed, during process we also came out with novel method for safe extubation for which we have got copyright from Government of India.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Submental intubation is a safe and efficient intraoperative airway management technique for patients with craniomaxillofacial injuries when there is concurrent facial trauma. This study findings would underscore the safety and efficacy of SEI, making it a promising unparalleled method of airway management worth considering.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":" ","pages":"NP230-NP241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11563016/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-05-30DOI: 10.1177/19433875241257572
Heather Peluso, Kevin Vega, Sthefano Araya, Lindsay Talemal, Civanni Moss, Jake Siegel, Adam Walchak
<p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a retrospective study using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Facial laceration repairs are one of the most common procedures performed in the emergency department (ED). The goal of this study was to describe the patient's characteristics and healthcare cost associated with ED encounters for facial lacerations using the largest nationally representative database in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. The data was collected between January and December of 2019. Patients with either a primary or secondary diagnosis of facial laceration were included. The primary outcome was patient characteristics. The secondary outcomes were ED characteristics, number and type of procedures performed and total encounter charges. Diagnoses and procedures were identified using ICD-10 CM codes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 2,548,944 ED encounters for facial lacerations in the United States. Of those, laceration was the chief complaint in 75%. 80% of lacerations were unintentional, 8% were due to assaults, and <1% due to suicidal attempts. The most common laceration location was the scalp (21%) followed by the lip (11%) and eyelid (11%). The mean patient age was 38 years. Most patients were adults (69%), male (62%), Caucasian (64%, African American 14%, Hispanic 14%, Other 4%, Asian 2%), from low income levels ($1-$45,999: 29%, $46,000- $58,999: 24%, $59,000-$78,999: 24%, $79,000 or more: 23%), with private insurance (32%, Medicaid 25%, Medicare 24%, self-pay 12%, other 6%). Most encounters were during summer (June, July, August) at large metropolitan areas with at least 1 million residents (52%, small metropolitan: 30%, micropolitan: 10%, other: 7%) at teaching hospitals (65%) located in the southern region of the United States (37%, Midwest: 23%, west: 21%, northeast: 19%). Almost half of the encounters were at non-trauma-designated hospitals (48%, Level 1 trauma center: 21%, Level 2 trauma center: 17%, Level 3 trauma center: 13%). The number of procedures during each encounter was: none: 4%, one: 17%, two: 23%, three: 11%, four: 11%, five or more: 28%. The most frequent laceration repair was a simple repair of superficial wounds of the face, ears, eyelids, nose, lips, and/or mucous membranes 2.5 cm or less, followed by simple repair of superficial wounds to the scalp, neck, axillae, external genitalia, trunk, and/or extremities 2.5 cm or less. Most emergency department visits were billed as a Level 3 encounter, followed by Level 2 then Level 4. CT scan of the head was the most common imaging modality. Of all patients, <1% were admitted to the hospital and 87% were discharged home. The average total emergency department charges were $5,733.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Facial laceration is a common complaint in the emergency department. It is costly, and disproportion
{"title":"Incidence and Characterization of Facial Lacerations in Emergency Departments in the United States.","authors":"Heather Peluso, Kevin Vega, Sthefano Araya, Lindsay Talemal, Civanni Moss, Jake Siegel, Adam Walchak","doi":"10.1177/19433875241257572","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875241257572","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a retrospective study using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Facial laceration repairs are one of the most common procedures performed in the emergency department (ED). The goal of this study was to describe the patient's characteristics and healthcare cost associated with ED encounters for facial lacerations using the largest nationally representative database in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. The data was collected between January and December of 2019. Patients with either a primary or secondary diagnosis of facial laceration were included. The primary outcome was patient characteristics. The secondary outcomes were ED characteristics, number and type of procedures performed and total encounter charges. Diagnoses and procedures were identified using ICD-10 CM codes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 2,548,944 ED encounters for facial lacerations in the United States. Of those, laceration was the chief complaint in 75%. 80% of lacerations were unintentional, 8% were due to assaults, and <1% due to suicidal attempts. The most common laceration location was the scalp (21%) followed by the lip (11%) and eyelid (11%). The mean patient age was 38 years. Most patients were adults (69%), male (62%), Caucasian (64%, African American 14%, Hispanic 14%, Other 4%, Asian 2%), from low income levels ($1-$45,999: 29%, $46,000- $58,999: 24%, $59,000-$78,999: 24%, $79,000 or more: 23%), with private insurance (32%, Medicaid 25%, Medicare 24%, self-pay 12%, other 6%). Most encounters were during summer (June, July, August) at large metropolitan areas with at least 1 million residents (52%, small metropolitan: 30%, micropolitan: 10%, other: 7%) at teaching hospitals (65%) located in the southern region of the United States (37%, Midwest: 23%, west: 21%, northeast: 19%). Almost half of the encounters were at non-trauma-designated hospitals (48%, Level 1 trauma center: 21%, Level 2 trauma center: 17%, Level 3 trauma center: 13%). The number of procedures during each encounter was: none: 4%, one: 17%, two: 23%, three: 11%, four: 11%, five or more: 28%. The most frequent laceration repair was a simple repair of superficial wounds of the face, ears, eyelids, nose, lips, and/or mucous membranes 2.5 cm or less, followed by simple repair of superficial wounds to the scalp, neck, axillae, external genitalia, trunk, and/or extremities 2.5 cm or less. Most emergency department visits were billed as a Level 3 encounter, followed by Level 2 then Level 4. CT scan of the head was the most common imaging modality. Of all patients, <1% were admitted to the hospital and 87% were discharged home. The average total emergency department charges were $5,733.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Facial laceration is a common complaint in the emergency department. It is costly, and disproportion","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":" ","pages":"NP113-NP120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11563022/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-08-02DOI: 10.1177/19433875241272440
Carol Y Wang, Daniel Y Kwon, Olachi Oleru, Nargiz Seyidova, Peter E Shamamian, Keisha E Montalmant, Alex Sarosi, Peter J Taub
Study design: National database study.
Objective: Road traffic accidents (RTAs) are a common and challenging cause of facial fractures in the United States. The present study sought to utilize the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) to investigate national trends, injury patterns and disparities in facial fractures secondary to RTAs. To date, this is the first study to do so.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with primary facial fractures secondary to RTAs using the 2018-2021 HCUP-NIS. Patients were classified into the RTA and non-RTA group. Demographics, injury patterns, and inpatient outcomes were compared.
Results: In total, 154,185 primary facial fractures were identified, of which 17% (n = 26,115) were associated with RTAs. RTAs commonly involved cars (41%), followed by motorcycles (15%), pedestrians (11%), and bicyclists (10%). The RTA group was younger (34% vs 24% < 25 years, P < .01) and more frequently Hispanic (18% vs 15%, P < .01). The most common fracture types were mandibular (23%), frontal (14%), and orbital fractures (14%). The RTA group was 50% more likely to have multiple facial fractures (OR = 1.5, P < .01). The RTA group had a longer length of stay (5.3 vs 4.0 days, P < .01), admission charge ($127,932 vs $79,414, P < .01), and mortality rate (1.9% vs 1.4%, P < .01) than the non-RTA group.
Conclusions: The present findings provide valuable insights, informing early involvement of craniofacial surgeons for the assessment of combination facial fractures and tailored treatment approaches for RTA patients.
{"title":"The Burden of Road Traffic Accidents on Facial Fractures: National Trends, Injury Patterns, and Disparities in 154,185 Patients.","authors":"Carol Y Wang, Daniel Y Kwon, Olachi Oleru, Nargiz Seyidova, Peter E Shamamian, Keisha E Montalmant, Alex Sarosi, Peter J Taub","doi":"10.1177/19433875241272440","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875241272440","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>National database study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Road traffic accidents (RTAs) are a common and challenging cause of facial fractures in the United States. The present study sought to utilize the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) to investigate national trends, injury patterns and disparities in facial fractures secondary to RTAs. To date, this is the first study to do so.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with primary facial fractures secondary to RTAs using the 2018-2021 HCUP-NIS. Patients were classified into the RTA and non-RTA group. Demographics, injury patterns, and inpatient outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 154,185 primary facial fractures were identified, of which 17% (n = 26,115) were associated with RTAs. RTAs commonly involved cars (41%), followed by motorcycles (15%), pedestrians (11%), and bicyclists (10%). The RTA group was younger (34% vs 24% < 25 years, <i>P</i> < .01) and more frequently Hispanic (18% vs 15%, <i>P</i> < .01). The most common fracture types were mandibular (23%), frontal (14%), and orbital fractures (14%). The RTA group was 50% more likely to have multiple facial fractures (OR = 1.5, <i>P</i> < .01). The RTA group had a longer length of stay (5.3 vs 4.0 days, <i>P</i> < .01), admission charge ($127,932 vs $79,414, <i>P</i> < .01), and mortality rate (1.9% vs 1.4%, <i>P</i> < .01) than the non-RTA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present findings provide valuable insights, informing early involvement of craniofacial surgeons for the assessment of combination facial fractures and tailored treatment approaches for RTA patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":" ","pages":"NP182-NP191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562984/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1177/19433875241292164
Khalil Issa, Nicholas A Frisco, Kayla W Kilpatrick, Maragatha Kuchibhatla, Dane M Barrett, David B Powers, Charles R Woodard
Study design: Single-institution retrospective financial analysis.
Objective: Trauma care is consistently linked to inadequate reimbursement, posing a significant financial burden for large trauma centers. Data show that declining Medicare reimbursement rates have indirectly led to declining payment for all procedures covered by insurance. The goals of this study are to investigate the opportunity cost associated with contemporary surgical management of CMF trauma at our institution and to evaluate longitudinal financial trends.
Methods: Patients with operative facial fractures between 2015 and 2022 at Duke University Medical Center were included and compared to patients undergoing general otolaryngology, plastic surgery and oral surgery operations in the same period. Procedural codes, payor type, charges billed, collections, relative value units (RVUs) and other financial data were obtained and analyzed among the 2 patient populations. Comparative analysis was performed to assess the financial trends in data reported previously from 2007-2015.
Results: The collection rate at Duke University Medical Center for operatively managed CMF fractures remains significantly lower than non-CMF counterparts. Interestingly, the collection rate gap between CMF and non-CMF surgeries has narrowed when comparing to the data from 2007-2013. This is largely due to a decrease in collection rates for non-CMF procedures from 29.61% (2007-2013) to 26.57% (2015-2022) [P = 0.0001] and an increase in collection rates for CMF procedures from 17.25% (2007-2013) to 18.05% (2015-2022) [P = 0.0001].
Conclusions: Despite a slight improvement of the gap in reimbursement rates for CMF and non-CMF surgeries over the last several years, trauma care continues to have a negative financial impact on health care institutions.
{"title":"Opportunity Cost of Surgical Management of Craniomaxillofacial Trauma: A Longitudinal Study.","authors":"Khalil Issa, Nicholas A Frisco, Kayla W Kilpatrick, Maragatha Kuchibhatla, Dane M Barrett, David B Powers, Charles R Woodard","doi":"10.1177/19433875241292164","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875241292164","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Single-institution retrospective financial analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Trauma care is consistently linked to inadequate reimbursement, posing a significant financial burden for large trauma centers. Data show that declining Medicare reimbursement rates have indirectly led to declining payment for all procedures covered by insurance. The goals of this study are to investigate the opportunity cost associated with contemporary surgical management of CMF trauma at our institution and to evaluate longitudinal financial trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with operative facial fractures between 2015 and 2022 at Duke University Medical Center were included and compared to patients undergoing general otolaryngology, plastic surgery and oral surgery operations in the same period. Procedural codes, payor type, charges billed, collections, relative value units (RVUs) and other financial data were obtained and analyzed among the 2 patient populations. Comparative analysis was performed to assess the financial trends in data reported previously from 2007-2015.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The collection rate at Duke University Medical Center for operatively managed CMF fractures remains significantly lower than non-CMF counterparts. Interestingly, the collection rate gap between CMF and non-CMF surgeries has narrowed when comparing to the data from 2007-2013. This is largely due to a decrease in collection rates for non-CMF procedures from 29.61% (2007-2013) to 26.57% (2015-2022) [<i>P</i> = 0.0001] and an increase in collection rates for CMF procedures from 17.25% (2007-2013) to 18.05% (2015-2022) [<i>P</i> = 0.0001].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite a slight improvement of the gap in reimbursement rates for CMF and non-CMF surgeries over the last several years, trauma care continues to have a negative financial impact on health care institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":" ","pages":"NP290-NP297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559586/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142628506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-24DOI: 10.1177/19433875241272436
Nils-Claudius Gellrich, Michael Grant, Damir Matic, Philippe Korn
Study design: This study presents a review of the evolutionary development in reconstructive orbital surgery over the past 3 decades. Additionally, it proposes the Orbital Assessment Algorithm (OA2) to enhance decision-making for intraorbital reconstruction of post-traumatic orbital deformities.
Objective: The objective of this paper is to provide insights into modern post-traumatic orbital reconstruction from a surgeon's perspective, with a specific focus on adult patients. It aims to highlight the advancements in computer-aided design and manufacturing techniques, particularly in the field of reconstructive orbital surgery, and to introduce the OA2 as a tool for improved decision-making in this context.
Methods: The study conducts a comprehensive review of the evolution of reconstructive orbital surgery, focusing on the integration of 3D technology into surgical practices. It also outlines the development and rationale behind the proposed OA2, emphasizing its potential to enhance the accuracy and efficacy of intraorbital reconstruction procedures for post-traumatic deformities.
Results: The review demonstrates the significant progress made in reconstructive orbital surgery, particularly in leveraging 3D technology for virtual modeling, navigation, and the design and manufacturing of patient-specific implants. The introduction of the OA2 provides a structured approach to assessing and addressing post-traumatic orbital deformities, offering potential benefits in decision-making and surgical outcomes.
Conclusions: In conclusion, this paper underscores the pivotal role of computer-aided design and manufacturing in advancing reconstructive orbital surgery. It highlights the importance of integrating innovative design concepts into implant manufacturing processes and emphasizes the potential of the OA2 to guide surgeons in the management of post-traumatic orbital deformities, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes.
研究设计:本研究回顾了过去三十年来眼眶重建手术的发展历程。此外,它还提出了眼眶评估算法(OA2),以提高外伤后眼眶畸形眶内重建的决策水平:本文旨在从外科医生的角度深入探讨现代创伤后眼眶重建术,特别关注成年患者。本文旨在强调计算机辅助设计和制造技术的进步,尤其是在眼眶重建手术领域的进步,并介绍 OA2 作为在此背景下改进决策的工具:本研究全面回顾了眼眶重建手术的发展历程,重点关注 3D 技术与手术实践的结合。方法:该研究全面回顾了眼眶重建手术的发展历程,重点介绍了将三维技术融入手术实践的情况,并概述了拟议中的 OA2 的开发和原理,强调了其在提高创伤后畸形眼眶内重建手术的准确性和有效性方面的潜力:结果:综述展示了眼眶重建手术取得的重大进展,尤其是在利用三维技术进行虚拟建模、导航以及设计和制造患者专用植入物方面。OA2 的引入为评估和处理创伤后眼眶畸形提供了一种结构化方法,为决策和手术效果带来了潜在的益处:总之,本文强调了计算机辅助设计和制造在推进眼眶重建手术中的关键作用。它强调了将创新设计理念融入植入物制造过程的重要性,并强调了 OA2 在指导外科医生处理创伤后眼眶畸形方面的潜力,最终有助于改善患者的治疗效果。
{"title":"Guidelines for Orbital Defect Assessment and Patient-Specific Implant Design: Introducing OA<sup>2</sup> (Orbital Assessment Algorithm).","authors":"Nils-Claudius Gellrich, Michael Grant, Damir Matic, Philippe Korn","doi":"10.1177/19433875241272436","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875241272436","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study presents a review of the evolutionary development in reconstructive orbital surgery over the past 3 decades. Additionally, it proposes the Orbital Assessment Algorithm (OA<sup>2</sup>) to enhance decision-making for intraorbital reconstruction of post-traumatic orbital deformities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this paper is to provide insights into modern post-traumatic orbital reconstruction from a surgeon's perspective, with a specific focus on adult patients. It aims to highlight the advancements in computer-aided design and manufacturing techniques, particularly in the field of reconstructive orbital surgery, and to introduce the OA<sup>2</sup> as a tool for improved decision-making in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study conducts a comprehensive review of the evolution of reconstructive orbital surgery, focusing on the integration of 3D technology into surgical practices. It also outlines the development and rationale behind the proposed OA2, emphasizing its potential to enhance the accuracy and efficacy of intraorbital reconstruction procedures for post-traumatic deformities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review demonstrates the significant progress made in reconstructive orbital surgery, particularly in leveraging 3D technology for virtual modeling, navigation, and the design and manufacturing of patient-specific implants. The introduction of the OA<sup>2</sup> provides a structured approach to assessing and addressing post-traumatic orbital deformities, offering potential benefits in decision-making and surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, this paper underscores the pivotal role of computer-aided design and manufacturing in advancing reconstructive orbital surgery. It highlights the importance of integrating innovative design concepts into implant manufacturing processes and emphasizes the potential of the OA<sup>2</sup> to guide surgeons in the management of post-traumatic orbital deformities, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":" ","pages":"NP298-NP318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559584/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142630301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-04-01DOI: 10.1177/19433875241242940
Dumindu Weerakkody, Kevin Nguyen, Evania Lok, Richard Khor, Sweet P Ng, Ben Starvaggi, Morikatsu Wada, Henry Li, Sally Kiu-Huen Ng
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: Calvarial osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a rare but devastating complication of radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to describe the cumulative incidence of Calvarial ORN in patients in patients treated for cutaneous malignancy of the scalp.
Methods: Data was compiled from patient records of a large tertiary hospital Plastic Surgery department and radiotherapy records of an affiliated cancer Center. We included all patients that were treated for cutaneous malignancies of the scalp that received radiotherapy. Patient demographics, cancer stage, treatment modalities, intraoperative details, and patient outcome data were recorded. Patients with incomplete radiotherapy data were excluded.
Results: We analyzed 105 radiotherapy treatments to the scalp administered to 84 patients and recorded 7 cases of calvarial ORN resulting in a gross incidence of 6.67% per radiotherapy treatment. The parietal bone was the most frequently targeted site of radiotherapy and accordingly the most common site of ORN (85.7%). Median time from radiotherapy dose to the development of ORN was 846 days. Higher number of radiotherapy fractionation (P = .038), cumulative radiotherapy dose (P = .035), prolonged radiotherapy duration (P = .022) and skin grafting (P = .003) were associated with the development of ORN.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest radiotherapy variables, such as prolonged radiotherapy duration, increased cumulative dose and higher radiotherapy fractions were strongly associated with the development of ORN. In addition, skin grafting following surgical resection was associated with the development of ORN. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to further explore this relationship.
{"title":"Incidence and Factors Associated With the Development of Calvarial Osteoradionecrosis in Patients Treated for Cutaneous Malignancies.","authors":"Dumindu Weerakkody, Kevin Nguyen, Evania Lok, Richard Khor, Sweet P Ng, Ben Starvaggi, Morikatsu Wada, Henry Li, Sally Kiu-Huen Ng","doi":"10.1177/19433875241242940","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875241242940","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Calvarial osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a rare but devastating complication of radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to describe the cumulative incidence of Calvarial ORN in patients in patients treated for cutaneous malignancy of the scalp.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was compiled from patient records of a large tertiary hospital Plastic Surgery department and radiotherapy records of an affiliated cancer Center. We included all patients that were treated for cutaneous malignancies of the scalp that received radiotherapy. Patient demographics, cancer stage, treatment modalities, intraoperative details, and patient outcome data were recorded. Patients with incomplete radiotherapy data were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 105 radiotherapy treatments to the scalp administered to 84 patients and recorded 7 cases of calvarial ORN resulting in a gross incidence of 6.67% per radiotherapy treatment. The parietal bone was the most frequently targeted site of radiotherapy and accordingly the most common site of ORN (85.7%). Median time from radiotherapy dose to the development of ORN was 846 days. Higher number of radiotherapy fractionation (<i>P</i> = .038), cumulative radiotherapy dose (<i>P</i> = .035), prolonged radiotherapy duration (<i>P</i> = .022) and skin grafting (<i>P</i> = .003) were associated with the development of ORN.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest radiotherapy variables, such as prolonged radiotherapy duration, increased cumulative dose and higher radiotherapy fractions were strongly associated with the development of ORN. In addition, skin grafting following surgical resection was associated with the development of ORN. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to further explore this relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":" ","pages":"NP51-NP59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11563015/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-10-23DOI: 10.1177/19433875241296681
{"title":"Moving Forward: The Last Subscription Issue and the Dawn of Open Access.","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/19433875241296681","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875241296681","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":" ","pages":"269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559561/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142630315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-09-04DOI: 10.1177/19433875241280781
Jesse Menville, Luke Soliman, Nidhi Shinde, Carole Spake, Stephanie Francalancia, Josue Marquez-Garcia, Nikhil Sobti, Vinay Rao, Albert S Woo
Study design: A retrospective study.
Objective: The Markowitz-Manson classification system categorizes nasoorbitoethmoid (NOE) fractures by severity of injury and remaining integrity of the medial canthal tendon. However, this system does not account for direction of bony displacement (in-fracture vs out-fracture), which can greatly affect symptomatology and management. We hypothesize that NOE fractures will present differently based upon their severity: Type I injuries are likely to present with medial nasal bone displacement (in-fracture), whereas Type III fractures will be more prone to lateral displacement (out-fracture).
Methods: A retrospective review was performed for all patients with NOE fractures who were evaluated by the plastic surgery department at a level 1 trauma center over a 6-year period. Computed tomography data were evaluated to assess for directionality of fracture segment displacement. Frequencies of medial, lateral, and non-displacement across NOE types were compared by Chi-Squared Goodness of Fit and Fisher's Exact Tests.
Results: 111 patients met inclusion criteria. The patient population was 73.9% male and averaged 51.2 years old. When bilateral fractures were counted independently, there were 141 cases in total: 115 Type I, 20 Type II, and 6 Type III. Type I fractures were most commonly in-fractured (48.7%), while Type III injuries were consistently out-fractured (100%) (p < .001).
Conclusions: While Type II and III NOE fractures have dominated clinical focus, this study highlights the prevalence of impaction within Type I fractures. These findings advocate for a more comprehensive approach to the evaluation of Type I NOE fractures and their potential risks, including traumatic hypotelorism and nasal airway obstruction.
研究设计回顾性研究:马科维茨-曼森(Markowitz-Manson)分类系统根据损伤的严重程度和内侧眼肌腱的剩余完整性对鼻骨乙状韧带(NOE)骨折进行分类。然而,该系统并不考虑骨移位的方向(骨折内与骨折外),而骨移位的方向会对症状和治疗产生很大影响。我们假设,NOE 骨折会根据其严重程度表现出不同的症状:Ⅰ型损伤可能表现为鼻骨内侧移位(骨折内),而Ⅲ型骨折则更容易表现为鼻骨外侧移位(骨折外):方法:我们对一级创伤中心整形外科在 6 年内评估过的所有 NOE 骨折患者进行了回顾性研究。对计算机断层扫描数据进行评估,以确定骨折段移位的方向性。通过Chi-Squared拟合优度检验和费雪精确检验比较了不同NOE类型的内侧、外侧和无移位的频率:111 名患者符合纳入标准。患者中73.9%为男性,平均年龄为51.2岁。如果将双侧骨折单独计算,则共有 141 例:115 例 I 型骨折、20 例 II 型骨折和 6 例 III 型骨折。I型骨折最常见的是内骨折(48.7%),而III型损伤则一直是外骨折(100%)(p < .001):结论:虽然 II 型和 III 型 NOE 骨折一直是临床关注的焦点,但本研究强调了 I 型骨折中撞击的普遍性。这些发现主张采用更全面的方法来评估 I 型 NOE 骨折及其潜在风险,包括创伤性张力过低和鼻气道阻塞。
{"title":"In- Versus Out-Fracture: A Novel Concept in Naso-Orbito-Ethmoid Injury.","authors":"Jesse Menville, Luke Soliman, Nidhi Shinde, Carole Spake, Stephanie Francalancia, Josue Marquez-Garcia, Nikhil Sobti, Vinay Rao, Albert S Woo","doi":"10.1177/19433875241280781","DOIUrl":"10.1177/19433875241280781","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Markowitz-Manson classification system categorizes nasoorbitoethmoid (NOE) fractures by severity of injury and remaining integrity of the medial canthal tendon. However, this system does not account for direction of bony displacement (in-fracture vs out-fracture), which can greatly affect symptomatology and management. We hypothesize that NOE fractures will present differently based upon their severity: Type I injuries are likely to present with medial nasal bone displacement (in-fracture), whereas Type III fractures will be more prone to lateral displacement (out-fracture).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed for all patients with NOE fractures who were evaluated by the plastic surgery department at a level 1 trauma center over a 6-year period. Computed tomography data were evaluated to assess for directionality of fracture segment displacement. Frequencies of medial, lateral, and non-displacement across NOE types were compared by Chi-Squared Goodness of Fit and Fisher's Exact Tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>111 patients met inclusion criteria. The patient population was 73.9% male and averaged 51.2 years old. When bilateral fractures were counted independently, there were 141 cases in total: 115 Type I, 20 Type II, and 6 Type III. Type I fractures were most commonly in-fractured (48.7%), while Type III injuries were consistently out-fractured (100%) (<i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While Type II and III NOE fractures have dominated clinical focus, this study highlights the prevalence of impaction within Type I fractures. These findings advocate for a more comprehensive approach to the evaluation of Type I NOE fractures and their potential risks, including traumatic hypotelorism and nasal airway obstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":" ","pages":"NP249-NP256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562987/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142649131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}