首页 > 最新文献

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen最新文献

英文 中文
Physiotherapeutische Forschungsaktivitäten an den deutschen Universitätskliniken: eine Online-Umfrage unter den Leitungen der physiotherapeutischen Abteilungen [德国大学医院的物理治疗研究活动:对物理治疗部门负责人的在线调查]。
IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.006
Erik J. Ehlers , Franziska Feldmann , Judith Gartmann , Carolin Kraushaar , Annalena Paus , Isabelle Stickdorn , Susanne G.R. Klotz

Introduction

German university hospitals, with their three pillars of research, teaching, and care, enjoy a special status in the health care and science system. Alongside care and teaching, the research pillar has also become increasingly relevant for physiotherapy at university hospitals. Nevertheless, there has been no comprehensive study to date of the status of physiotherapy research activities at German university hospitals. This study aims to provide an overview of research activities and their framework conditions.

Methods

A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among the heads of physiotherapy departments at all 36 German university hospitals in order to collect data on physiotherapy research activities. The questionnaire used for this purpose was developed in advance with the help of a systematic literature review and an expert survey. The survey was analyzed descriptively.

Results

With a response rate of 58%, eight of the 21 university hospitals included in the survey have been conducting physiotherapy research, in some cases for over a decade. The most frequently reported obstacles to research are lack of financial resources (n = 10) and lack of interest or appreciation from other professions (n = 7). Most frequently, research projects are conducted in the medical specialties of orthopedics and trauma surgery (n = 10), intensive care medicine (n = 8), pediatrics (n = 6), and the outpatient sector (n = 6). Clinical research accounts for 58% (n = 18) of research activities. Interprofessional research is more common (n = 13, 72%) than intraprofessional research (n = 5, 28%). In addition to the CRediT roles of resources (n = 6) and investigation (n = 6), the role of conceptualization in the research process (n = 6) is also among the most common. Over the two-year period, a median of three articles was published with first or last authorship assigned to physiotherapists.

Conclusion

The online survey shows that there is little physiotherapy research activity at German university hospitals. In order to strengthen physiotherapy research, changes in professional and scientific policy and financial support are needed.
德国大学医院以科研、教学、护理为三大支柱,在卫生保健和科学体系中享有特殊地位。除了护理和教学之外,研究支柱也与大学医院的物理治疗越来越相关。然而,迄今为止尚未对德国大学医院的物理治疗研究活动状况进行全面研究。本研究旨在概述研究活动及其框架条件。方法:对德国所有36所大学附属医院的物理治疗部门负责人进行横断面在线调查,以收集有关物理治疗研究活动的数据。用于此目的的问卷是在系统的文献回顾和专家调查的帮助下事先制定的。对调查进行了描述性分析。结果:参与调查的21家大学医院中,有8家一直在进行物理治疗研究,有的已经进行了10多年,回复率为58%。最常见的研究障碍是缺乏财政资源( = 10)和缺乏其他专业的兴趣或赞赏( = 7)。最常见的研究项目是在骨科和创伤外科( = 10)、重症监护医学( = 8)、儿科( = 6)和门诊部( = 6)等医学专业进行的。临床研究占研究活动的58% (n = 18)。跨专业研究(n = 13,72%)比专业内研究(n = 5,28%)更为常见。除了资源(n = 6)和调查(n = 6)的信用作用外,概念化在研究过程中的作用(n = 6)也是最常见的。在这两年期间,发表的第一或最后作者为物理治疗师的文章中位数为三篇。结论:在线调查显示,德国大学医院的物理治疗研究活动很少。加强物理治疗研究,需要改变专业、科学的政策和资金支持。
{"title":"Physiotherapeutische Forschungsaktivitäten an den deutschen Universitätskliniken: eine Online-Umfrage unter den Leitungen der physiotherapeutischen Abteilungen","authors":"Erik J. Ehlers ,&nbsp;Franziska Feldmann ,&nbsp;Judith Gartmann ,&nbsp;Carolin Kraushaar ,&nbsp;Annalena Paus ,&nbsp;Isabelle Stickdorn ,&nbsp;Susanne G.R. Klotz","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.006","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>German university hospitals, with their three pillars of research, teaching, and care, enjoy a special status in the health care and science system. Alongside care and teaching, the research pillar has also become increasingly relevant for physiotherapy at university hospitals. Nevertheless, there has been no comprehensive study to date of the status of physiotherapy research activities at German university hospitals. This study aims to provide an overview of research activities and their framework conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among the heads of physiotherapy departments at all 36 German university hospitals in order to collect data on physiotherapy research activities. The questionnaire used for this purpose was developed in advance with the help of a systematic literature review and an expert survey. The survey was analyzed descriptively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With a response rate of 58%, eight of the 21 university hospitals included in the survey have been conducting physiotherapy research, in some cases for over a decade. The most frequently reported obstacles to research are lack of financial resources (n = 10) and lack of interest or appreciation from other professions (n = 7). Most frequently, research projects are conducted in the medical specialties of orthopedics and trauma surgery (n = 10), intensive care medicine (n = 8), pediatrics (n = 6), and the outpatient sector (n = 6). Clinical research accounts for 58% (n = 18) of research activities. Interprofessional research is more common (n = 13, 72%) than intraprofessional research (n = 5, 28%). In addition to the CRediT roles of resources (n = 6) and investigation (n = 6), the role of conceptualization in the research process (n = 6) is also among the most common. Over the two-year period, a median of three articles was published with first or last authorship assigned to physiotherapists.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The online survey shows that there is little physiotherapy research activity at German university hospitals. In order to strengthen physiotherapy research, changes in professional and scientific policy and financial support are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"194 ","pages":"Pages 8-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143671581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Liste der Affiliierten Institute und Fachgesellschaften / List of Affiliations 附属机构名单
IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-16 DOI: 10.1016/S1865-9217(25)00108-4
{"title":"Liste der Affiliierten Institute und Fachgesellschaften / List of Affiliations","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S1865-9217(25)00108-4","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1865-9217(25)00108-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"194 ","pages":"Page OBC"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143838800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Plädoyer für ein nachhaltigeres Gesundheitssystem – die Rolle der Technologiebewertung [为更可持续的卫生保健系统辩护——技术评估的作用]。
IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2025.03.003
Matthias Perleth , Barbara Buchberger , Peter Kolominsky-Rabas
Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is established as a tool for evidence-based decision support in the health care sector. HTA aims to determine the value of a health technology at different points in its life cycle and to promote an equitable, efficient and high-quality health care system.
The health care sector is estimated to be responsible for 5% of greenhouse gas emissions and raw material consumption. Buildings, anesthetic gases, metered dose inhalers, pharmaceuticals and medical devices are important drivers of these emissions.
So far, sustainability as (according to Brundtland) a development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs, has not played a role as a decision-making criterion in the introduction and provision of health care technologies. The concept of sustainability could extend HTA to the entire life cycle (the ‘first’ and the ‘last’ mile) and thus establish the ecological footprint as a further dimension in the assessment process. Despite international efforts to achieve climate neutrality in the health care sector, there are as yet no concrete strategies for implementation in Germany and Europe, with the exception of the UK. The political mood is even moving in the direction of climate policy regression.
A sustainability strategy could draw on a large number of national and European regulations outside the health care sector and integrate them into existing methodological approaches, such as the incremental carbon footprint effectiveness ratio. At the practical level, these findings could be incorporated into climate-sensitive health counseling. The future federal government, professional associations and health care professionals should take urgent action.
卫生技术评估(HTA)是作为卫生保健部门基于证据的决策支持工具而建立的。卫生技术评价旨在确定一项卫生技术在其生命周期不同阶段的价值,并促进建立一个公平、高效和高质量的卫生保健系统。据估计,卫生保健部门占温室气体排放和原材料消耗的5%。建筑物、麻醉气体、计量吸入器、药品和医疗设备是这些排放的重要驱动因素。迄今为止,可持续性(根据布伦特兰的说法)是一种满足当代人的需要而不损害后代人满足其自身需要的能力的发展,在引进和提供保健技术方面尚未作为一项决策标准发挥作用。可持续发展的概念可以将HTA扩展到整个生命周期(“第一英里”和“最后一英里”),从而将生态足迹作为评估过程中的进一步维度。尽管国际社会努力在卫生保健领域实现气候中和,但在德国和欧洲,除英国外,还没有具体的实施战略。政治情绪甚至正朝着气候政策倒退的方向发展。可持续性战略可借鉴医疗保健部门以外的大量国家和欧洲法规,并将其纳入现有的方法学方法,如增量碳足迹效率比。在实际层面上,这些发现可以纳入对气候敏感的健康咨询。未来的联邦政府、专业协会和卫生保健专业人员应该采取紧急行动。
{"title":"Plädoyer für ein nachhaltigeres Gesundheitssystem – die Rolle der Technologiebewertung","authors":"Matthias Perleth ,&nbsp;Barbara Buchberger ,&nbsp;Peter Kolominsky-Rabas","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.03.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.03.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is established as a tool for evidence-based decision support in the health care sector. HTA aims to determine the value of a health technology at different points in its life cycle and to promote an equitable, efficient and high-quality health care system.</div><div>The health care sector is estimated to be responsible for 5% of greenhouse gas emissions and raw material consumption. Buildings, anesthetic gases, metered dose inhalers, pharmaceuticals and medical devices are important drivers of these emissions.</div><div>So far, sustainability as (according to Brundtland) a development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs, has not played a role as a decision-making criterion in the introduction and provision of health care technologies. The concept of sustainability could extend HTA to the entire life cycle (the ‘first’ and the ‘last’ mile) and thus establish the ecological footprint as a further dimension in the assessment process. Despite international efforts to achieve climate neutrality in the health care sector, there are as yet no concrete strategies for implementation in Germany and Europe, with the exception of the UK. The political mood is even moving in the direction of climate policy regression.</div><div>A sustainability strategy could draw on a large number of national and European regulations outside the health care sector and integrate them into existing methodological approaches, such as the incremental carbon footprint effectiveness ratio. At the practical level, these findings could be incorporated into climate-sensitive health counseling. The future federal government, professional associations and health care professionals should take urgent action.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"194 ","pages":"Pages 17-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143732317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Barrieren und Förderfaktoren der Inanspruchnahme von Präventionsprogrammen zur Förderung der seelischen Gesundheit bei Kindern im Vor- und Grundschulalter [在学龄前和小学学龄儿童中使用心理健康预防方案的障碍和促进因素]。
IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2024.11.002
Max Weniger , Josephine Kümpfel , Katja Beesdo-Baum , Julia Zink , Cornelia Beate Siegmund , Patricia Theresa Porst , Maria McDonald , Veit Roessner , Susanne Knappe
<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Emotional and behavioural problems occur frequently in childhood and are usually associated with burdens on children, families, and society. Preventive interventions could reduce these burdens, but are rarely used despite their availability and effectiveness. The aim was to identify general, individual, structural, and family-related barriers/facilitators to potential and actual participation in prevention programs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>As part of a prospective implementation study, n = 3,231 project folders were handed out to parents in 28 paediatric practices in Dresden and surrounding area during routine health check-ups (U9–U11) for children aged 5 to 10 years. In addition to screening for mental health problems, a questionnaire was used to identify potential barriers/facilitators to participation in prevention programs. Of n = 2,844 families agreeing to participate in the study n = 2,122 (74.6 %) completed the questionnaire at least partially. Regression analyses were used to test associations between potential barriers/facilitators and actual participation in (a) a pre-intervention interview (PII; in order to check indications with the program provider) or (b) the prevention program among children with a prevention recommendation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the participating families, 1.8 % reported that they had already participated in a prevention program to improve mental health or had received a recommendation for it before. 59.5 % of the families expressed their general interest in such programs, and 95.7 % would participate if their paediatrician recommended it. At the structural level, a lack of knowledge about mental health prevention programs was identified as a barrier to potential participation; as only 9.2 % of the families were aware of such programs before participating in the study. 65.8 % of all the families considered full reimbursement of the participation fees after paying in advance a prerequisite for their potential program participation, and 56.7 % wanted to receive a voucher from their health insurance fund entitling them to participate without prepayment. At the individual level, the parents’ attitude towards the usefulness of prevention programs predicted the actual utilisation of the PII after the paediatrician's recommendation. At the structural level, the acceptance of longer travel times (up to 60 minutes) as well as the assumption/reimbursement of the entire course fees were relevant predictors. Furthermore, male sex (of the children) and higher screening scores were also important predictors at the family-related level. After the PII, the only factor associated with actual participation in prevention programs was efficient public transport accessibility.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>In order to increase participation in prevention programs, funding to cover participation fees should be secured through health insurance funds. In addit
背景和目的:情绪和行为问题经常发生在儿童时期,通常与儿童、家庭和社会的负担有关。预防性干预措施可以减轻这些负担,但尽管有其可用性和有效性,但很少使用。目的是确定一般,个人,结构和家庭相关的障碍/促进潜在和实际参与预防方案。方法:作为前瞻性实施研究的一部分,在德累斯顿及周边地区的28个儿科诊所(U9-U11)对5至10岁儿童进行常规健康检查时,向家长分发了n = 3,231份项目文件夹。除了筛选心理健康问题外,还使用问卷来确定参与预防计划的潜在障碍/促进因素。在同意参与研究的2,844个家庭中,有2,122个(74.6%)至少部分完成了问卷。回归分析用于测试潜在障碍/促进因素与实际参与(a)干预前访谈(PII;为了检查项目提供者的适应症)或(b)儿童预防项目的预防建议。结果:在参与的家庭中,1.8%的家庭报告说他们已经参加了一个改善心理健康的预防项目,或者以前收到过建议。59.5%的家庭表达了对此类项目的普遍兴趣,如果儿科医生推荐,95.7%的家庭会参加。在结构层面上,缺乏关于心理健康预防项目的知识被认为是潜在参与的障碍;因为只有9.2%的家庭在参与研究之前知道这些项目。65.8%的家庭认为,提前支付参保费用后全额报销是他们可能参加项目的先决条件,56.7%的家庭希望从他们的健康保险基金获得一张代金券,使他们能够不预付费用就参加项目。在个人层面上,父母对预防项目有用性的态度预测了儿科医生建议后个人健康指数的实际使用情况。在结构一级,接受较长的旅行时间(最多60分钟)以及承担/偿还全部课程费用是相关的预测因素。此外,男性(儿童)和较高的筛查分数也是家庭相关水平的重要预测因素。在PII之后,与实际参与预防计划相关的唯一因素是有效的公共交通可达性。讨论:为了增加对预防方案的参与,应通过健康保险基金确保支付参与费的资金。此外,公众以及儿科医生在筛查方面的广告和教育措施可以提高对有用方案的认识并改善态度。在儿童环境中实施这些方案可以减少结构性障碍,创造平等的参与机会。
{"title":"Barrieren und Förderfaktoren der Inanspruchnahme von Präventionsprogrammen zur Förderung der seelischen Gesundheit bei Kindern im Vor- und Grundschulalter","authors":"Max Weniger ,&nbsp;Josephine Kümpfel ,&nbsp;Katja Beesdo-Baum ,&nbsp;Julia Zink ,&nbsp;Cornelia Beate Siegmund ,&nbsp;Patricia Theresa Porst ,&nbsp;Maria McDonald ,&nbsp;Veit Roessner ,&nbsp;Susanne Knappe","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.11.002","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Background and Aims&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Emotional and behavioural problems occur frequently in childhood and are usually associated with burdens on children, families, and society. Preventive interventions could reduce these burdens, but are rarely used despite their availability and effectiveness. The aim was to identify general, individual, structural, and family-related barriers/facilitators to potential and actual participation in prevention programs.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;As part of a prospective implementation study, n = 3,231 project folders were handed out to parents in 28 paediatric practices in Dresden and surrounding area during routine health check-ups (U9–U11) for children aged 5 to 10 years. In addition to screening for mental health problems, a questionnaire was used to identify potential barriers/facilitators to participation in prevention programs. Of n = 2,844 families agreeing to participate in the study n = 2,122 (74.6 %) completed the questionnaire at least partially. Regression analyses were used to test associations between potential barriers/facilitators and actual participation in (a) a pre-intervention interview (PII; in order to check indications with the program provider) or (b) the prevention program among children with a prevention recommendation.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Of the participating families, 1.8 % reported that they had already participated in a prevention program to improve mental health or had received a recommendation for it before. 59.5 % of the families expressed their general interest in such programs, and 95.7 % would participate if their paediatrician recommended it. At the structural level, a lack of knowledge about mental health prevention programs was identified as a barrier to potential participation; as only 9.2 % of the families were aware of such programs before participating in the study. 65.8 % of all the families considered full reimbursement of the participation fees after paying in advance a prerequisite for their potential program participation, and 56.7 % wanted to receive a voucher from their health insurance fund entitling them to participate without prepayment. At the individual level, the parents’ attitude towards the usefulness of prevention programs predicted the actual utilisation of the PII after the paediatrician's recommendation. At the structural level, the acceptance of longer travel times (up to 60 minutes) as well as the assumption/reimbursement of the entire course fees were relevant predictors. Furthermore, male sex (of the children) and higher screening scores were also important predictors at the family-related level. After the PII, the only factor associated with actual participation in prevention programs was efficient public transport accessibility.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Discussion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;In order to increase participation in prevention programs, funding to cover participation fees should be secured through health insurance funds. In addit","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"194 ","pages":"Pages 94-107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142819485","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
General practitioner-based interventions to reduce hospital admissions in patients with multimorbidity living at home – A rapid review 以全科医生为基础的干预措施,以减少住院多病患者住在家里-快速回顾。
IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2025.01.005
Julia Nothacker , Stefanie Butz , Dagmar Lühmann , Paula Duwe , Marjan van den Akker , Ulrich Thiem , Martin Scherer , Ingmar Schäfer

Background

Multimorbidity is a common health problem among patients treated in GP practices and often associated with an increased risk of hospitalization. The aim of this review was to identify GP-based interventions to reduce hospitalization in patients with multimorbidity who were evaluated in randomized controlled trials.

Methods

For the rapid review, the databases Medline and CENTRAL were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating an effect of GP-based interventions on the duration or frequency of hospitalization in adult patients with multimorbidity living at home. The interventions and their effects were described narratively.

Results

From 2,260 hits in the database searches, 15 studies could be included. The interventions identified included, amongst others, interdisciplinary cooperation, training of GPs and other practice staff, and increased patient centeredness. Hospital admissions were reported in 13 studies, and the number of days spent in hospital was reported in six studies. Two studies found a significant reduction in hospitalization.

Conclusions

While most interventions were not effective, there were also two GP-based interventions for patients with multimorbidity which focused on the patients’ individual situation and contributed to avoiding hospitalization. However, more studies are needed to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of various measures.
背景:在全科医生治疗的患者中,多病是一种常见的健康问题,通常与住院风险增加有关。本综述的目的是确定以gp为基础的干预措施,以减少在随机对照试验中评估的多病患者的住院率。方法:为了快速回顾,我们系统地检索了Medline和CENTRAL数据库,以评估基于gp的干预措施对居住在家中的多病成年患者住院时间或频率的影响。叙述了干预措施及其效果。结果:从数据库搜索的2260个结果中,可以包括15项研究。确定的干预措施包括,除其他外,跨学科合作,培训全科医生和其他执业人员,并增加以患者为中心。13项研究报告了住院情况,6项研究报告了住院天数。两项研究发现住院率显著降低。结论:虽然大多数干预措施无效,但对于多病患者,也有两种基于gp的干预措施,这些干预措施关注患者的个体情况,有助于避免住院。然而,需要更多的研究来对各种措施的有效性做出可靠的陈述。
{"title":"General practitioner-based interventions to reduce hospital admissions in patients with multimorbidity living at home – A rapid review","authors":"Julia Nothacker ,&nbsp;Stefanie Butz ,&nbsp;Dagmar Lühmann ,&nbsp;Paula Duwe ,&nbsp;Marjan van den Akker ,&nbsp;Ulrich Thiem ,&nbsp;Martin Scherer ,&nbsp;Ingmar Schäfer","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.01.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.01.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Multimorbidity is a common health problem among patients treated in GP practices and often associated with an increased risk of hospitalization. The aim of this review was to identify GP-based interventions to reduce hospitalization in patients with multimorbidity who were evaluated in randomized controlled trials.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>For the rapid review, the databases Medline and CENTRAL were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating an effect of GP-based interventions on the duration or frequency of hospitalization in adult patients with multimorbidity living at home. The interventions and their effects were described narratively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 2,260 hits in the database searches, 15 studies could be included. The interventions identified included, amongst others, interdisciplinary cooperation, training of GPs and other practice staff, and increased patient centeredness. Hospital admissions were reported in 13 studies, and the number of days spent in hospital was reported in six studies. Two studies found a significant reduction in hospitalization.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While most interventions were not effective, there were also two GP-based interventions for patients with multimorbidity which focused on the patients’ individual situation and contributed to avoiding hospitalization. However, more studies are needed to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of various measures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"194 ","pages":"Pages 74-85"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143531906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Versorgungsnahe Daten zur Bewertung der vergleichenden Effektivität von medizinischen Behandlungen: eine Bestandsaufnahme der verfügbaren Datenquellen in Deutschland unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Registern [用于比较有效性研究的真实世界数据:评估德国的可用数据源,特别是关于登记的数据]。
IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2025.01.008
Malik Cakir , Paula Starke , Alexandra Nolting , Wendi Qu , Dawid Pieper , Tim Mathes
Using real-world data (RWD) for comparative effectiveness research has gained increasing attention. Real-world data is usually not collected with the primary aim of answering questions about the comparative effectiveness of medical interventions. Therefore, data collection is often not optimally designed for this purpose. For this reason, using it can be associated with several data-related or analysis-related problems.
This article has two aims: First of all, we will outline the basic requirements for comparative non-randomized studies based on RWD. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of potentially eligible RWD in Germany will be considered. In particular, the use of registry data will be discussed, as these currently appear to be the most suitable for comparing the effectiveness of interventions.
There are now various databases in Germany that contain RWD and can potentially be used for comparative effectiveness research. If they contain all the necessary information and if the data are of sufficient quality, they could offer a timely and efficient way of determining the effectiveness of medical interventions. However, our analysis shows that the use of this data is sometimes associated with considerable limitations. RWD is often highly aggregated and thus may not be sufficiently detailed to select the subjects precisely or to emulate the intervention or control interventions satisfactorily. In addition, many data sources only encompass a limited set of variables and limited time horizons (e.g., only hospitalization) according to their intended purpose (e.g., billing). Therefore, it is often questionable whether this includes all endpoints on benefit and harm that are important for the assessment and whether sufficiently long observation horizons/follow-up periods are given. Similarly, it is often questionable whether all necessary data to avoid bias are included. Furthermore, it is often difficult to assess suitability in advance due to the lack of available information.
利用真实世界数据(RWD)进行比较有效性研究已受到越来越多的关注。收集真实世界的数据通常不是为了回答有关医疗干预措施相对有效性的问题。因此,数据收集通常不是为此目的而优化设计的。由于这个原因,使用它可能与几个与数据或分析相关的问题相关联。本文有两个目的:首先,我们将概述基于RWD的比较非随机研究的基本要求。此外,将考虑在德国可能符合条件的RWD的优缺点。特别是,将讨论登记数据的使用,因为这些数据目前似乎是比较干预措施有效性的最合适的方法。现在德国有各种数据库包含RWD,可以潜在地用于比较有效性研究。如果它们包含所有必要的信息,如果数据具有足够的质量,它们可以提供一种及时和有效的方法来确定医疗干预措施的有效性。然而,我们的分析表明,这些数据的使用有时存在相当大的局限性。RWD通常是高度汇总的,因此可能不够详细,无法精确地选择受试者或令人满意地模拟干预或控制干预。此外,许多数据源根据其预期用途(例如,计费)仅包含一组有限的变量和有限的时间范围(例如,仅住院)。因此,这是否包括对评估很重要的益处和危害的所有终点,以及是否给出了足够长的观察视野/随访期,常常值得怀疑。同样,是否包括所有必要的数据以避免偏见也常常值得怀疑。此外,由于缺乏可用信息,往往难以事先评估其适用性。
{"title":"Versorgungsnahe Daten zur Bewertung der vergleichenden Effektivität von medizinischen Behandlungen: eine Bestandsaufnahme der verfügbaren Datenquellen in Deutschland unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Registern","authors":"Malik Cakir ,&nbsp;Paula Starke ,&nbsp;Alexandra Nolting ,&nbsp;Wendi Qu ,&nbsp;Dawid Pieper ,&nbsp;Tim Mathes","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.01.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.01.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using real-world data (RWD) for comparative effectiveness research has gained increasing attention. Real-world data is usually not collected with the primary aim of answering questions about the comparative effectiveness of medical interventions. Therefore, data collection is often not optimally designed for this purpose. For this reason, using it can be associated with several data-related or analysis-related problems.</div><div>This article has two aims: First of all, we will outline the basic requirements for comparative non-randomized studies based on RWD. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of potentially eligible RWD in Germany will be considered. In particular, the use of registry data will be discussed, as these currently appear to be the most suitable for comparing the effectiveness of interventions.</div><div>There are now various databases in Germany that contain RWD and can potentially be used for comparative effectiveness research. If they contain all the necessary information and if the data are of sufficient quality, they could offer a timely and efficient way of determining the effectiveness of medical interventions. However, our analysis shows that the use of this data is sometimes associated with considerable limitations. RWD is often highly aggregated and thus may not be sufficiently detailed to select the subjects precisely or to emulate the intervention or control interventions satisfactorily. In addition, many data sources only encompass a limited set of variables and limited time horizons (e.g., only hospitalization) according to their intended purpose (e.g., billing). Therefore, it is often questionable whether this includes all endpoints on benefit and harm that are important for the assessment and whether sufficiently long observation horizons/follow-up periods are given. Similarly, it is often questionable whether all necessary data to avoid bias are included. Furthermore, it is often difficult to assess suitability in advance due to the lack of available information.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"194 ","pages":"Pages 1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143558339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Herausgeberkollegium / Editorial Board Herausgeberkollegium编委会
IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-16 DOI: 10.1016/S1865-9217(25)00104-7
{"title":"Herausgeberkollegium / Editorial Board","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S1865-9217(25)00104-7","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S1865-9217(25)00104-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"194 ","pages":"Page ii"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143838791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hemmende und fördernde Faktoren für die Integration akademischer Pflegerollen in die psychiatrische Versorgungspraxis: Teilergebnisse der AkaPP-Studie [将学术护理角色融入精神病学实践的障碍和促进因素:AkaPP研究的部分结果]。
IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2025.01.002
Stefan Scheydt , André Nienaber , Martin Holzke
<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The integration of academically qualified nurses into psychiatric care is crucial to the quality of patient care and the professional satisfaction of nurses. Despite its increasing importance and political demand, the integration of academic nursing roles into (psychiatric) care practice appears to be progressing slowly. This study therefore examines how academically qualified nurses who work in direct psychiatric nursing practice, practice development or nursing research perceive the integration of their academic nursing role into psychiatric care practice and which contextual factors promote or inhibit the integration of academic nursing roles into psychiatric nursing and care practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data collection for the nationwide AkaPP study took place between August and November 2020 using a specially developed online questionnaire. The target population of the study was academically qualified nurses working in psychiatric settings (n = 185). The subgroup of academically qualified nurses working in direct psychiatric nursing practice, practice development or nursing research (n = 100) was analyzed as part of this sub-study. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistical methods as well as appropriate statistical procedures to test the correlation between certain variables of role development or role integration and the rating of role integration (Chi-square test, Cramer’s <em>V</em>, Spearman’s rank correlation). Qualitative data (free text data) were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Reporting was based on the STROBE checklist.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, role integration is rated as less successful (<em>MV</em> = 2.62; <em>SD</em> = 1.309). The results show that time resources for extended tasks (<em>V</em> = .554, <em>p</em> < .000) and for exchange and networking (<em>V</em> = .570, <em>p</em> < .001) correlate significantly with satisfaction with role integration. A specific description of tasks and activities (<em>V</em> = .522, <em>p</em> < .000) and for research activities (<em>V</em> = .453, <em>p</em> < .001) are also moderately to strongly associated with a positive assessment of role integration. On the other hand, induction concepts, trainee programs, and specific training courses do not show a strong statistical correlation with role integration. The use of systematic concepts such as the PEPPA framework was described by only a small group but tended to show a higher level of satisfaction. The main obstacles to successful role integration were lack of acceptance by members of one’s own discipline (68.2%) or lack of appropriate differentiation of tasks and activities (60.5%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In order to successfully integrate academically qualified nurses into psychiatric nursing practice, nursing management, educational institutions, and policy makers should pay more attention to the provision of
简介:整合学术合格的护士进入精神科护理是至关重要的病人护理质量和护士的专业满意度。尽管其日益重要和政治需求,整合学术护理角色到(精神科)护理实践似乎进展缓慢。因此,本研究考察了直接从事精神科护理实践、实践发展或护理研究的学术合格护士如何感知其学术护理角色与精神科护理实践的整合,以及哪些背景因素促进或抑制学术护理角色与精神科护理和护理实践的整合。方法:在2020年8月至11月期间,使用专门开发的在线问卷收集全国性AkaPP研究的数据。研究的目标人群是在精神科工作的具有学术资格的护士(n = 185)。直接从事精神科护理实践、实践发展或护理研究的学术合格护士亚组(n = 100)作为该子研究的一部分进行分析。采用描述性统计方法和相应的统计程序进行数据分析,检验角色发展或角色整合的某些变量与角色整合等级之间的相关性(卡方检验,Cramer's V, Spearman's秩相关)。定性数据(自由文本数据)采用定性内容分析法进行分析。报告基于STROBE检查表。结果:总体而言,角色整合被评为较不成功(MV = 2.62;SD = 1.309)。结果表明,扩展任务的时间资源(V = 。554, p 结论:为了使学术上合格的护士成功融入精神科护理实践,护理管理、教育机构和政策制定者应更加重视提供时间资源、明确角色描述和促进研究活动。实施系统的角色发展方法也可以提高护士的整合和满意度。
{"title":"Hemmende und fördernde Faktoren für die Integration akademischer Pflegerollen in die psychiatrische Versorgungspraxis: Teilergebnisse der AkaPP-Studie","authors":"Stefan Scheydt ,&nbsp;André Nienaber ,&nbsp;Martin Holzke","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.01.002","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Introduction&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The integration of academically qualified nurses into psychiatric care is crucial to the quality of patient care and the professional satisfaction of nurses. Despite its increasing importance and political demand, the integration of academic nursing roles into (psychiatric) care practice appears to be progressing slowly. This study therefore examines how academically qualified nurses who work in direct psychiatric nursing practice, practice development or nursing research perceive the integration of their academic nursing role into psychiatric care practice and which contextual factors promote or inhibit the integration of academic nursing roles into psychiatric nursing and care practice.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Data collection for the nationwide AkaPP study took place between August and November 2020 using a specially developed online questionnaire. The target population of the study was academically qualified nurses working in psychiatric settings (n = 185). The subgroup of academically qualified nurses working in direct psychiatric nursing practice, practice development or nursing research (n = 100) was analyzed as part of this sub-study. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistical methods as well as appropriate statistical procedures to test the correlation between certain variables of role development or role integration and the rating of role integration (Chi-square test, Cramer’s &lt;em&gt;V&lt;/em&gt;, Spearman’s rank correlation). Qualitative data (free text data) were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Reporting was based on the STROBE checklist.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Overall, role integration is rated as less successful (&lt;em&gt;MV&lt;/em&gt; = 2.62; &lt;em&gt;SD&lt;/em&gt; = 1.309). The results show that time resources for extended tasks (&lt;em&gt;V&lt;/em&gt; = .554, &lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt; &lt; .000) and for exchange and networking (&lt;em&gt;V&lt;/em&gt; = .570, &lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt; &lt; .001) correlate significantly with satisfaction with role integration. A specific description of tasks and activities (&lt;em&gt;V&lt;/em&gt; = .522, &lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt; &lt; .000) and for research activities (&lt;em&gt;V&lt;/em&gt; = .453, &lt;em&gt;p&lt;/em&gt; &lt; .001) are also moderately to strongly associated with a positive assessment of role integration. On the other hand, induction concepts, trainee programs, and specific training courses do not show a strong statistical correlation with role integration. The use of systematic concepts such as the PEPPA framework was described by only a small group but tended to show a higher level of satisfaction. The main obstacles to successful role integration were lack of acceptance by members of one’s own discipline (68.2%) or lack of appropriate differentiation of tasks and activities (60.5%).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;In order to successfully integrate academically qualified nurses into psychiatric nursing practice, nursing management, educational institutions, and policy makers should pay more attention to the provision of ","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"194 ","pages":"Pages 64-73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143524618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abschlusseditorial Abschlusseditorial .
IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.005
Susanne Knappe , Ute Lewitzka , Anna Kuehne , Arne Bürger
{"title":"Abschlusseditorial","authors":"Susanne Knappe ,&nbsp;Ute Lewitzka ,&nbsp;Anna Kuehne ,&nbsp;Arne Bürger","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"194 ","pages":"Pages 108-109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143617299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fatigue bei Krebs: Wie (gut) sind Betroffene an onkologischen Einrichtungen in Deutschland versorgt? 癌症相关疲劳:德国癌症护理机构的护理质量如何(好)?]
IF 1.4 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.003
Anna S. Wagner , Marlena Milzer , Senta Kiermeier , Martina E. Schmidt , Truong D. Nguyen , Karen Steindorf , Imad Maatouk

Background

One of the most common sequelae of cancer and/or its treatment is cancer-related fatigue (CRF). For those affected, CRF is often accompanied by considerable, even long-term impairment. This makes it all the more important to examine how care is provided in Germany and to what extent guideline recommendations are implemented in clinical practice.

Methods

In a Germany-wide questionnaire survey, inpatient and outpatient oncological cancer care facilities were asked to describe their approach to CRF (information and education, screening, diagnostics), local treatment options, and clinical trials.

Results

A total of 145 facilities participated, including 11 comprehensive cancer centers, 35 organ-specific cancer centers, 22 hospitals with a (hemato-)oncology unit, 29 outpatient (hemato-)oncology practices, 48 outpatient cancer counseling units. Nearly all the facilities reported that patients are provided verbal health information (per groups: 90.9%, 88.6%, 90.9%, 96.9%, 72.9%); less frequently in written form (90.9%, 54.3%, 59.1%, 48.3%, 87.5%). A systematic screening for CRF is conducted in up to one-third of the facilities (per groups: 27.3%, 20.0%, 31.8%, 17.2%, 8.3%). A standardized procedure for further clarification of CRF is available at a small number of institutions (0%, 11.4%, 13.6%, 6.9%, 2.1%). Exercise (90.9%, 82.9%, 72.7%, 79.3%, 89.6%) and psychotherapeutic services (90.9%, 68.6%, 86.4%, 62.1%, 68.8%) are most frequently actively recommended to patients with CRF across the facility groups.

Discussion

With regard to the systematization of screening and diagnosis of CRF as well as the provision of information material, there is a clear discrepancy between guideline recommendations and everyday clinical practice.
背景:癌症和/或其治疗最常见的后遗症之一是癌症相关性疲劳(CRF)。对于那些受影响的人来说,慢性肾功能衰竭往往伴随着相当大的,甚至是长期的损害。这使得检查在德国如何提供护理以及指南建议在临床实践中的实施程度变得更加重要。方法:在德国范围内的问卷调查中,要求住院和门诊肿瘤护理机构描述他们的CRF方法(信息和教育,筛查,诊断),当地治疗方案和临床试验。结果:共有145家机构参与,包括11家综合性癌症中心、35家器官特异性癌症中心、22家设有(血液)肿瘤科室的医院、29家门诊(血液)肿瘤诊所、48家门诊癌症咨询单位。几乎所有机构都报告向患者提供口头健康信息(每组:90.9%、88.6%、90.9%、96.9%、72.9%);书面表达频率较低(90.9%、54.3%、59.1%、48.3%、87.5%)。在多达三分之一的设施中对CRF进行了系统筛查(每组:27.3%,20.0%,31.8%,17.2%,8.3%)。少数机构有进一步澄清CRF的标准化程序(0%、11.4%、13.6%、6.9%、2.1%)。运动(90.9%,82.9%,72.7%,79.3%,89.6%)和心理治疗服务(90.9%,68.6%,86.4%,62.1%,68.8%)在各机构组中最常被积极推荐给CRF患者。讨论:关于CRF筛查和诊断的系统化以及信息材料的提供,指南建议与日常临床实践之间存在明显差异。
{"title":"Fatigue bei Krebs: Wie (gut) sind Betroffene an onkologischen Einrichtungen in Deutschland versorgt?","authors":"Anna S. Wagner ,&nbsp;Marlena Milzer ,&nbsp;Senta Kiermeier ,&nbsp;Martina E. Schmidt ,&nbsp;Truong D. Nguyen ,&nbsp;Karen Steindorf ,&nbsp;Imad Maatouk","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.zefq.2025.02.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>One of the most common sequelae of cancer and/or its treatment is cancer-related fatigue (CRF). For those affected, CRF is often accompanied by considerable, even long-term impairment. This makes it all the more important to examine how care is provided in Germany and to what extent guideline recommendations are implemented in clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In a Germany-wide questionnaire survey, inpatient and outpatient oncological cancer care facilities were asked to describe their approach to CRF (information and education, screening, diagnostics), local treatment options, and clinical trials.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 145 facilities participated, including 11 comprehensive cancer centers, 35 organ-specific cancer centers, 22 hospitals with a (hemato-)oncology unit, 29 outpatient (hemato-)oncology practices, 48 outpatient cancer counseling units. Nearly all the facilities reported that patients are provided verbal health information (per groups: 90.9%, 88.6%, 90.9%, 96.9%, 72.9%); less frequently in written form (90.9%, 54.3%, 59.1%, 48.3%, 87.5%). A systematic screening for CRF is conducted in up to one-third of the facilities (per groups: 27.3%, 20.0%, 31.8%, 17.2%, 8.3%). A standardized procedure for further clarification of CRF is available at a small number of institutions (0%, 11.4%, 13.6%, 6.9%, 2.1%). Exercise (90.9%, 82.9%, 72.7%, 79.3%, 89.6%) and psychotherapeutic services (90.9%, 68.6%, 86.4%, 62.1%, 68.8%) are most frequently actively recommended to patients with CRF across the facility groups.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>With regard to the systematization of screening and diagnosis of CRF as well as the provision of information material, there is a clear discrepancy between guideline recommendations and everyday clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"194 ","pages":"Pages 40-47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143587825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1