Pub Date : 2023-04-24DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2023.2201877
Beate Klösch, Markus Hadler, Markus Reiter-Haas, E. Lex
The COVID-19 pandemic and the climate crisis are polarizing people's opinions worldwide, particularly with regard to restrictive policy measures. We examine the effects of social media use and personal concerns on opinions toward selected COVID-19 and environmental measures, and whether public opinion toward the two crises shows similar polarization patterns. The data is derived from an online survey conducted in German-speaking countries in the summer of 2020. Our analyses show that opinions toward COVID-19 measures are more polarized than toward environmental measures, and that personal concerns play a far greater role than social media use in shaping opinions toward policy measures for both crises. Only few platforms show significant and divergent effects, which we attribute to their different characteristics and potentials for the emergence of filter bubbles and echo chambers. We also observe a generational effect, suggesting that older individuals are more likely to support COVID-19 measures, while younger generations tend to do so for environmental measures. Furthermore, we find an unexpectedly high number of people who are completely opposed to all policy measures for both crises, again mainly due to personal concerns and attitudes. The results are discussed in the context of the time period in which the survey was conducted, as well as in relation to current developments, and from the perspective of the free-rider problem as a possible explanation for the one-sided polarization observed. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
{"title":"Polarized opinions on Covid-19 and environmental policy measures. The role of social media use and personal concerns in German-speaking countries.","authors":"Beate Klösch, Markus Hadler, Markus Reiter-Haas, E. Lex","doi":"10.1080/13511610.2023.2201877","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2023.2201877","url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic and the climate crisis are polarizing people's opinions worldwide, particularly with regard to restrictive policy measures. We examine the effects of social media use and personal concerns on opinions toward selected COVID-19 and environmental measures, and whether public opinion toward the two crises shows similar polarization patterns. The data is derived from an online survey conducted in German-speaking countries in the summer of 2020. Our analyses show that opinions toward COVID-19 measures are more polarized than toward environmental measures, and that personal concerns play a far greater role than social media use in shaping opinions toward policy measures for both crises. Only few platforms show significant and divergent effects, which we attribute to their different characteristics and potentials for the emergence of filter bubbles and echo chambers. We also observe a generational effect, suggesting that older individuals are more likely to support COVID-19 measures, while younger generations tend to do so for environmental measures. Furthermore, we find an unexpectedly high number of people who are completely opposed to all policy measures for both crises, again mainly due to personal concerns and attitudes. The results are discussed in the context of the time period in which the survey was conducted, as well as in relation to current developments, and from the perspective of the free-rider problem as a possible explanation for the one-sided polarization observed. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)","PeriodicalId":46877,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85885186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-18DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2023.2195583
R. Sipos, M. Åkerman
{"title":"Introducing the Critical Making Responsibility framework for analyzing responsible innovation processes in grassroots practices","authors":"R. Sipos, M. Åkerman","doi":"10.1080/13511610.2023.2195583","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2023.2195583","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46877,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85550992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-08DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2023.2195584
Piotr Konieczny
{"title":"European Wikipedia platforms, sharing economy and national differences in participation: a case study","authors":"Piotr Konieczny","doi":"10.1080/13511610.2023.2195584","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2023.2195584","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46877,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","volume":"235 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87003495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-03DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2023.2211892
V. Fava
Social innovation has become a buzzword to refer to local welfare reforms involving citizens as co-producers of local public services (Campomori and Casula 2022). Policy makers use it as a ‘magic concept’ which will help them tackle and solve emerging social problems and reduce inequality (Casula 2022). Still, social innovation remains an elusive, ‘weak’ and strongly contested concept (Moulaert, MacCallum, and Hillier 2013). It involves a plurality of actors – civil society actors or public actors, governmental and non-governmental organizations, social entrepreneurs, and public administrations – and relies on a variety of practices. Social scientists, policy makers and practitioners from different professional and disciplinary fields, have explored the concept from pragmatic and systemic perspectives, adopting both empirical and theoretical approaches, in an attempt to providing a unilateral, multidimensional and clearer definition of social innovation. They mostly have agreed on the ‘transformative power’ that co-creation and cooperation processes, on which social innovation practices rest, might have on society (Ziegler 2017; Schot and Steinmuller 2018). Articles included in this special issue focus on different social innovation practices – grass roots product innovation; community-led social innovation – and their implementation in different realms of local governance – integration of refugees, of minorities, of disabilities – and in different regional contexts, inside and outside the borders of the European Union. They share two main concerns which relate to the elusiveness of the concept: how to assess social innovation qualitatively and quantitatively, and how to institutionalize social innovation, making it not only successful but also durable, sustainable and selfsupporting. Theory is closely related to practice: the authors are aware that the spread of social innovation practices depends on the possibility to define social innovation and provide tools allowing actors to distinguish successful from unsuccessful social innovative practices, to evaluate and elaborate them, to assess risks. The empirical research cases presented in the following pages clearly demonstrate that the implementation of social innovative practices is not a straightforward process,but rather faces resistance and challenges and requires negotiations at many levels among different actors. This emerges markedly from the first group of articles – a mini special issue – composed of an introduction and 6 articles – presenting the results of the Interreg project (2019–2021) titled: ‘Integrating Refugees in Society and Labour Market through Social Innovation (SIforREF)’. As Casula, Campomori and Kazepov make clear in their introduction, in 2017, when they applied for funding, social innovation seemed the most
社会革新(Social innovation)是指市民作为地方公共服务的共同生产者参与的地方福利改革(Campomori and Casula 2022)。政策制定者将其作为一个“神奇的概念”，这将有助于他们处理和解决新出现的社会问题并减少不平等(Casula 2022)。尽管如此，社会创新仍然是一个难以捉摸的、“弱”的、有强烈争议的概念(Moulaert, MacCallum, and Hillier 2013)。它涉及多个行动者-民间社会行动者或公共行动者、政府和非政府组织、社会企业家和公共行政部门-并依赖于各种实践。来自不同专业和学科领域的社会科学家、政策制定者和实践者从实用主义和系统的角度探讨了这一概念，采用实证和理论相结合的方法，试图为社会创新提供一个单方面、多维度和更清晰的定义。他们大多同意社会创新实践所依赖的共同创造和合作过程可能对社会产生的“变革力量”(Ziegler 2017;Schot and Steinmuller 2018)。本期特刊的文章聚焦于不同的社会创新实践——草根产品创新;社区主导的社会创新——以及它们在地方治理的不同领域的实施——难民、少数民族、残疾人的融合——以及在欧盟境内外的不同区域背景下的融合。它们共同关心的两个主要问题与这一概念的难以捉摸有关:如何从质量和数量上评价社会创新，以及如何使社会创新制度化，使其不仅成功，而且持久、可持续和自我支持。理论与实践密切相关:作者意识到，社会创新实践的传播取决于定义社会创新的可能性，并提供工具，使行动者能够区分成功与不成功的社会创新实践，评估和阐述它们，评估风险。以下的实证研究案例清楚地表明，社会创新实践的实施不是一个简单的过程，而是面临阻力和挑战，需要不同行动者在多个层面上进行协商。这一点在第一组文章中得到了明显体现，这是一个迷你特刊，由一篇介绍和6篇文章组成，介绍了Interreg项目(2019-2021)的成果，题为“通过社会创新使难民融入社会和劳动力市场(SIforREF)”。正如Casula、Campomori和Kazepov在引言中明确指出的那样，2017年，当他们申请资助时，社会创新似乎是最重要的
{"title":"Inside the black box: in search of conceptual tools for evaluating and designing social innovative practices","authors":"V. Fava","doi":"10.1080/13511610.2023.2211892","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2023.2211892","url":null,"abstract":"Social innovation has become a buzzword to refer to local welfare reforms involving citizens as co-producers of local public services (Campomori and Casula 2022). Policy makers use it as a ‘magic concept’ which will help them tackle and solve emerging social problems and reduce inequality (Casula 2022). Still, social innovation remains an elusive, ‘weak’ and strongly contested concept (Moulaert, MacCallum, and Hillier 2013). It involves a plurality of actors – civil society actors or public actors, governmental and non-governmental organizations, social entrepreneurs, and public administrations – and relies on a variety of practices. Social scientists, policy makers and practitioners from different professional and disciplinary fields, have explored the concept from pragmatic and systemic perspectives, adopting both empirical and theoretical approaches, in an attempt to providing a unilateral, multidimensional and clearer definition of social innovation. They mostly have agreed on the ‘transformative power’ that co-creation and cooperation processes, on which social innovation practices rest, might have on society (Ziegler 2017; Schot and Steinmuller 2018). Articles included in this special issue focus on different social innovation practices – grass roots product innovation; community-led social innovation – and their implementation in different realms of local governance – integration of refugees, of minorities, of disabilities – and in different regional contexts, inside and outside the borders of the European Union. They share two main concerns which relate to the elusiveness of the concept: how to assess social innovation qualitatively and quantitatively, and how to institutionalize social innovation, making it not only successful but also durable, sustainable and selfsupporting. Theory is closely related to practice: the authors are aware that the spread of social innovation practices depends on the possibility to define social innovation and provide tools allowing actors to distinguish successful from unsuccessful social innovative practices, to evaluate and elaborate them, to assess risks. The empirical research cases presented in the following pages clearly demonstrate that the implementation of social innovative practices is not a straightforward process,but rather faces resistance and challenges and requires negotiations at many levels among different actors. This emerges markedly from the first group of articles – a mini special issue – composed of an introduction and 6 articles – presenting the results of the Interreg project (2019–2021) titled: ‘Integrating Refugees in Society and Labour Market through Social Innovation (SIforREF)’. As Casula, Campomori and Kazepov make clear in their introduction, in 2017, when they applied for funding, social innovation seemed the most","PeriodicalId":46877,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","volume":"72 1","pages":"155 - 157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85822410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-03DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2023.2211893
Francesca Campomori, Mattia Casula, Y. Kazepov
The so-called ‘refugee crisis’ marked a crucial juncture in migration governance across Europe. Policy-makers and local communities face the challenge of receiving and integrating migrants (often in extremely vulnerable conditions) in a context of poor governance arrangements and rising skepticism, or even hostility. In the light of such a complex scenario, this special issue explores social innovation as a promising approach to refugee integration. Socially innovative practices are indeed based on the active engagement of policy-makers and assorted stakeholders—including target groups through co-creation. In the realm of asylum policies, social innovation can thus facilitate the meeting of refugees’ needs as well as the benevolence of receiving communities, ultimately strengthening social cohesion in regions of settlement. Families hosting migrants at home, community-based cooperatives, and self-managed social spaces are all instances of socially innovative practices that are often initiated by non-state actors but that might be upscaled and transformed into fully fledged public policies—especially by policy-makers at the local and regional levels. The special issue will focus on labor, housing, and social integration of refugees (especially in the stages after their first reception) in the context of Central European cities and regions. The purpose is to develop conceptual tools for evaluating and designing socially innovative practices that might ultimately improve the social innovation capacity of local and regional governments. As the ‘social innovation’ concept risks to be ambiguous, the special issue will also allow researchers to develop a set of empirically grounded indicators for measuring social innovation capacity—especially based on the analysis of best practices that can be upscaled and replicated through mutual learning.
{"title":"Understanding social innovation in refugee integration: actors, practices, politics in Europe","authors":"Francesca Campomori, Mattia Casula, Y. Kazepov","doi":"10.1080/13511610.2023.2211893","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2023.2211893","url":null,"abstract":"The so-called ‘refugee crisis’ marked a crucial juncture in migration governance across Europe. Policy-makers and local communities face the challenge of receiving and integrating migrants (often in extremely vulnerable conditions) in a context of poor governance arrangements and rising skepticism, or even hostility. In the light of such a complex scenario, this special issue explores social innovation as a promising approach to refugee integration. Socially innovative practices are indeed based on the active engagement of policy-makers and assorted stakeholders—including target groups through co-creation. In the realm of asylum policies, social innovation can thus facilitate the meeting of refugees’ needs as well as the benevolence of receiving communities, ultimately strengthening social cohesion in regions of settlement. Families hosting migrants at home, community-based cooperatives, and self-managed social spaces are all instances of socially innovative practices that are often initiated by non-state actors but that might be upscaled and transformed into fully fledged public policies—especially by policy-makers at the local and regional levels. The special issue will focus on labor, housing, and social integration of refugees (especially in the stages after their first reception) in the context of Central European cities and regions. The purpose is to develop conceptual tools for evaluating and designing socially innovative practices that might ultimately improve the social innovation capacity of local and regional governments. As the ‘social innovation’ concept risks to be ambiguous, the special issue will also allow researchers to develop a set of empirically grounded indicators for measuring social innovation capacity—especially based on the analysis of best practices that can be upscaled and replicated through mutual learning.","PeriodicalId":46877,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","volume":"135 1","pages":"158 - 170"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89146302","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-31DOI: 10.46415/jss.2023.03.30.1.25
{"title":"The Hesitant Voters in the 21st National Assembly Election in Korea : Analysis of Late Deciders in Voting with Early Deciders and Non-participants in Voting","authors":"","doi":"10.46415/jss.2023.03.30.1.25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46415/jss.2023.03.30.1.25","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46877,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80144367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-31DOI: 10.46415/jss.2023.03.30.1.129
Myeong Soo Do, Chae Gi Kwack
{"title":"A Case Study on the Integration of Welfare Services in Welfare Housing for the Elderly","authors":"Myeong Soo Do, Chae Gi Kwack","doi":"10.46415/jss.2023.03.30.1.129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46415/jss.2023.03.30.1.129","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46877,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80255239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-31DOI: 10.46415/jss.2023.03.30.1.82
Tae Min Kim, Woongsun Yoo
{"title":"The Negative Effect of a Smiling Model in Luxury Brand’s Advertising : Focus on the Mediating Effect of Perceived Competence of the Brand","authors":"Tae Min Kim, Woongsun Yoo","doi":"10.46415/jss.2023.03.30.1.82","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46415/jss.2023.03.30.1.82","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46877,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","volume":"558 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77757363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-31DOI: 10.46415/jss.2023.03.30.1.241
Jaeho Jeon
{"title":"Why Did the Seoul Spring Fail? : A Comparison With the Prague Spring","authors":"Jaeho Jeon","doi":"10.46415/jss.2023.03.30.1.241","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46415/jss.2023.03.30.1.241","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46877,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","volume":"87 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79421979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-03-31DOI: 10.46415/jss.2023.03.30.1.164
Min Cho Kim, Young Min Lee
{"title":"The effect of perceived organizational support for career development on job satisfaction and organizational commitment : The mediating effect of professional career orientation","authors":"Min Cho Kim, Young Min Lee","doi":"10.46415/jss.2023.03.30.1.164","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.46415/jss.2023.03.30.1.164","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46877,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86503353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：