首页 > 最新文献

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies最新文献

英文 中文
Future-Proof Regulation against the Test of Time: The Evolution of European Telecommunications Regulation. 经得起时间考验的未来监管:欧洲电信监管的演变。
IF 1.2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqac016
Pablo Ibáñez Colomo

Regulation is sometimes designed to be future-proof, so that it can adapt to changing economic and technological realities. The EU (and UK) Regulatory Framework for electronic communications was expressly crafted to be able to adjust to the evolution of the industry. This article considers how well the regime has stood the test of time and, based on this analysis, what lessons can be drawn for regulation more generally. It appears that, by and large, the Framework has effectively accompanied the transformation of telecommunications in Europe. On the other hand, the EU legislature's commitment to future-proof intervention has waned over time. Every new review of the regime has represented a move away from the philosophy and mechanisms conceived to ensure that regulation would adapt seamlessly to industry shifts. This experience suggests that the failure or success of future-proof intervention primarily hinges on the intertemporal consistency of legislatures.

监管有时是为了适应未来，以便适应不断变化的经济和技术现实。欧盟(和英国)的电子通信监管框架是明确制定的，能够适应行业的发展。本文考虑了该制度经受住了时间的考验，并在此分析的基础上，为更普遍的监管汲取了哪些教训。总的来说，该框架似乎有效地伴随了欧洲电信的变革。另一方面，随着时间的推移，欧盟立法机构对未来干预的承诺已经减弱。每一次对监管制度的新审视都代表着一种背离理念和机制的举动，这种理念和机制旨在确保监管能够无缝地适应行业变化。这一经验表明，面向未来的干预的成败主要取决于立法机构的跨期一致性。
{"title":"Future-Proof Regulation against the Test of Time: The Evolution of European Telecommunications Regulation.","authors":"Pablo Ibáñez Colomo","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqac016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Regulation is sometimes designed to be future-proof, so that it can adapt to changing economic and technological realities. The EU (and UK) Regulatory Framework for electronic communications was expressly crafted to be able to adjust to the evolution of the industry. This article considers how well the regime has stood the test of time and, based on this analysis, what lessons can be drawn for regulation more generally. It appears that, by and large, the Framework has effectively accompanied the transformation of telecommunications in Europe. On the other hand, the EU legislature's commitment to future-proof intervention has waned over time. Every new review of the regime has represented a move away from the philosophy and mechanisms conceived to ensure that regulation would adapt seamlessly to industry shifts. This experience suggests that the failure or success of future-proof intervention primarily hinges on the intertemporal consistency of legislatures.</p>","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"42 4","pages":"1170-1194"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9732242/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10344877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件
IF 1.2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqac002
{"title":"OUP accepted manuscript","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqac002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"61433625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
OUP accepted manuscript OUP接受稿件
IF 1.2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqac005
{"title":"OUP accepted manuscript","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqac005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"61433707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ad Hominem Criminalisation and the Rule of Law: The Egalitarian Case against Knife Crime Prevention Orders 人身犯罪化与法治:反对持刀犯罪预防令的平等主义案例
IF 1.2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
Pub Date : 2021-12-22 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqab041
Alex Green, Jennifer Hendry
This article advances a novel account of ad hominem criminalisation that draws upon a distinct theory of the Rule of Law and its egalitarian foundations. Employing the recent and controversial example of Knife Crime Prevention Orders, as established by the Offensive Weapons Act 2019, it argues that the concept of civic equality is central to understanding the vice of ad hominem criminalisation as an aberrant form of government by law. This vice consists in the manner that such criminalisation individualises, differentiates and instrumentalises the regulatory subject, placing them outwith the bounds of civic equality as established by the Rule of Law.
本文利用独特的法治理论及其平等主义基础，提出了一种关于人身犯罪化的新颖解释。它以《2019年攻击性武器法》(Offensive Weapons Act 2019)最近设立的刀具犯罪预防令(Knife Crime Prevention Orders)为例，认为公民平等的概念对于理解人身犯罪化的恶习是一种反常的法治形式至关重要。这种恶习在于，这种刑事定罪将监管主体个体化、区分化和工具化，将他们置于法治所确立的公民平等的界限之外。
{"title":"Ad Hominem Criminalisation and the Rule of Law: The Egalitarian Case against Knife Crime Prevention Orders","authors":"Alex Green, Jennifer Hendry","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqab041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab041","url":null,"abstract":"This article advances a novel account of ad hominem criminalisation that draws upon a distinct theory of the Rule of Law and its egalitarian foundations. Employing the recent and controversial example of Knife Crime Prevention Orders, as established by the Offensive Weapons Act 2019, it argues that the concept of civic equality is central to understanding the vice of ad hominem criminalisation as an aberrant form of government by law. This vice consists in the manner that such criminalisation individualises, differentiates and instrumentalises the regulatory subject, placing them outwith the bounds of civic equality as established by the Rule of Law.","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"54 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138505770","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Mistaken Payments, Quasi-contracts, and the ‘Justice’ of Unjust Enrichment 错误支付、准合同与不当得利的“正义”
IF 1.2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
Pub Date : 2021-12-20 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqab042
Alexander Georgiou
The law of unjust enrichment has often been described as the law of events materially identical to a mistaken payment. By this, lawyers often mean that the cause of action in unjust enrichment is somehow shaped and grounded by the reason why the recipient of (some) mistaken payments morally ought to refund the payor. The difficulty, however, is that the normativity of mistaken payments remains a challenge to explain. This article aims to reinvigorate the view that the moral duty to return mistaken payments is grounded by a tacit agreement between the payor and payee that the payment was conditional (coupled with the failure of that condition). To do so, it critically examines the ways in which our intentions can be conditioned, and how those conditions are communicated in our agreements. The article concludes by examining what implications a conditions-based understanding might have for the law of unjust enrichment.
不当得利法经常被描述为与错误付款在本质上相同的事件法。通过这一点，律师通常意味着不当得利的诉讼原因在某种程度上是由(某些)错误付款的接受者在道德上应该退还付款人的原因所塑造和建立的。然而，困难在于，错误支付的规范性仍然是一个难以解释的挑战。本文旨在重振这样一种观点，即归还错误付款的道德义务是基于付款人和收款人之间的默契，即付款是有条件的(加上该条件的失败)。为了做到这一点，它批判性地考察了我们的意图可以被限制的方式，以及这些条件如何在我们的协议中传达。文章最后考察了以条件为基础的理解可能对不当得利法产生的影响。
{"title":"Mistaken Payments, Quasi-contracts, and the ‘Justice’ of Unjust Enrichment","authors":"Alexander Georgiou","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqab042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab042","url":null,"abstract":"The law of unjust enrichment has often been described as the law of events materially identical to a mistaken payment. By this, lawyers often mean that the cause of action in unjust enrichment is somehow shaped and grounded by the reason why the recipient of (some) mistaken payments morally ought to refund the payor. The difficulty, however, is that the normativity of mistaken payments remains a challenge to explain. This article aims to reinvigorate the view that the moral duty to return mistaken payments is grounded by a tacit agreement between the payor and payee that the payment was conditional (coupled with the failure of that condition). To do so, it critically examines the ways in which our intentions can be conditioned, and how those conditions are communicated in our agreements. The article concludes by examining what implications a conditions-based understanding might have for the law of unjust enrichment.","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"365 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138505765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corrigendum to: The e-Banknote as a ‘Banknote’: A Monetary Law Interpreted 更正:电子钞票作为“钞票”:货币法的解释
IF 1.2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
Pub Date : 2021-12-08 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqab023
Benjamin Geva,Seraina Neva Grünewald,Corinne Zellweger-Gutknecht
{"title":"Corrigendum to: The e-Banknote as a ‘Banknote’: A Monetary Law Interpreted","authors":"Benjamin Geva,Seraina Neva Grünewald,Corinne Zellweger-Gutknecht","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqab023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab023","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"54 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138505784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Inciting Military Disaffection in Interwar Britain and Fascist Italy: Security, Crime and Authoritarian Law 在两次世界大战之间的英国和法西斯意大利煽动军事不满:安全、犯罪和专制法
IF 1.2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
Pub Date : 2021-11-19 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqab036
Stephen Skinner
Abstract During the interwar period, two apparently different states, liberal democratic Britain and Fascist Italy, passed similar legislation establishing inchoate offences against military loyalty and obedience. These laws, the Incitement to Disaffection Act 1934 and article 266 of the 1930 Italian Penal Code, were intended to protect state security and the monopoly of force against political threats. This article compares these laws’ scope, rationales and purposes, and traces their longer-term origins in the consolidation of the modern state. It argues that this comparative historical analysis evidences important intersections in these systems’ uses of criminal law, and provides insights into the forms and extent of authoritarian tendencies and techniques in states’ legal practices, specifically in the security context and more generally within criminal law as a vector of state power across the political spectrum.
在两次世界大战之间，两个明显不同的国家——自由民主制的英国和法西斯主义的意大利——通过了类似的立法，确立了对军事忠诚和服从的早期犯罪。这些法律，即1934年《煽动不满法》和1930年《意大利刑法典》第266条，旨在保护国家安全和对政治威胁的武力垄断。本文比较了这些法律的范围、依据和目的，并追溯了它们在现代国家巩固中的长期起源。它认为，这种比较历史分析证明了这些系统对刑法的使用中的重要交叉点，并提供了对国家法律实践中专制倾向和技术的形式和程度的见解，特别是在安全背景下，更普遍地在刑法中作为国家权力在政治范围内的载体。
{"title":"Inciting Military Disaffection in Interwar Britain and Fascist Italy: Security, Crime and Authoritarian Law","authors":"Stephen Skinner","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqab036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab036","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract During the interwar period, two apparently different states, liberal democratic Britain and Fascist Italy, passed similar legislation establishing inchoate offences against military loyalty and obedience. These laws, the Incitement to Disaffection Act 1934 and article 266 of the 1930 Italian Penal Code, were intended to protect state security and the monopoly of force against political threats. This article compares these laws’ scope, rationales and purposes, and traces their longer-term origins in the consolidation of the modern state. It argues that this comparative historical analysis evidences important intersections in these systems’ uses of criminal law, and provides insights into the forms and extent of authoritarian tendencies and techniques in states’ legal practices, specifically in the security context and more generally within criminal law as a vector of state power across the political spectrum.","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"356 ","pages":"578-605"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138505756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corrigendum to: Balancing Rights and Interests: Reconstructing the Asymmetry Thesis 《平衡权利与利益:重构不对称理论》的勘误
IF 1.2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
Pub Date : 2021-11-11 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqab034
Matthias Klatt
{"title":"Corrigendum to: Balancing Rights and Interests: Reconstructing the Asymmetry Thesis","authors":"Matthias Klatt","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqab034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab034","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"53 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138505777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rethinking Administrative Law for Algorithmic Decision Making 算法决策中的行政法再思考
IF 1.2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
Pub Date : 2021-10-30 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqab032
Rebecca Williams
Abstract The increasing prevalence of algorithmic decision making (ADM) by public authorities raises a number of challenges for administrative law in the form of technical decisions about the necessary metrics for evaluating such systems, their opacity, the scalability of errors, their use of correlation as opposed to causation and so on. If administrative law is to provide the necessary guidance to enable optimal use of such systems, there are a number of ways in which it will need to become more nuanced and advanced. However, if it is able to rise to this challenge, administrative law has the potential not only to do useful work itself in controlling ADM, but also to support the work of the Information Commissioner’s Office and provide guidance on the interpretation of concepts such as ‘meaningful information’ and ‘proportionality’ within the General Data Protection Regulation.
公共当局的算法决策(ADM)日益普及，对行政法提出了许多挑战，其形式是关于评估此类系统的必要指标的技术决策，它们的不透明性，错误的可扩展性，它们对相关性的使用而不是因果关系等。如果行政法要提供必要的指导，使这些制度能够得到最佳利用，那么行政法就需要在若干方面变得更加细致和先进。然而，如果行政法能够应对这一挑战，它不仅有可能在控制ADM方面发挥有用的作用，而且还可以支持信息专员办公室的工作，并为《通用数据保护条例》中“有意义的信息”和“比例性”等概念的解释提供指导。
{"title":"Rethinking Administrative Law for Algorithmic Decision Making","authors":"Rebecca Williams","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqab032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab032","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The increasing prevalence of algorithmic decision making (ADM) by public authorities raises a number of challenges for administrative law in the form of technical decisions about the necessary metrics for evaluating such systems, their opacity, the scalability of errors, their use of correlation as opposed to causation and so on. If administrative law is to provide the necessary guidance to enable optimal use of such systems, there are a number of ways in which it will need to become more nuanced and advanced. However, if it is able to rise to this challenge, administrative law has the potential not only to do useful work itself in controlling ADM, but also to support the work of the Information Commissioner’s Office and provide guidance on the interpretation of concepts such as ‘meaningful information’ and ‘proportionality’ within the General Data Protection Regulation.","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"184 1","pages":"468 - 494"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"61432862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Taking Identity Seriously: On the Politics of the Individuation of Legal Systems 重视身份认同:论法律制度个性化的政治
IF 1.2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqab040
Cormac Mac Amhlaigh
This article examines the question of the identity of legal systems of non-monistic accounts of law. It critically analyses approaches to individuation based on validity, the nature of individual norms and the purposes for which they are applied, arguing that the latter approach, as endorsed particularly by Raz, offers the most convincing approach to the question of individuation. The article argues that Raz’s own criterion, however, is under-inclusive and misses important reasons why a norm should be individuated in a particular way. The article defends an approach to individuation which builds upon and expands Raz’s approach. This approach emphasises the political importance of legal systems as providing the basis for criteria of individuation. These criteria are also relevant for Dworkin’s account of law as integrity, which, the article argues, also relies on an understanding of individuation notwithstanding Dworkin’s claims to the contrary.
本文探讨了法律的非一元论帐户的法律制度的同一性问题。它批判性地分析了基于有效性的个性化方法，个人规范的性质及其应用的目的，认为后一种方法，特别是Raz所赞同的，为个性化问题提供了最令人信服的方法。文章认为，拉兹自己的标准，然而，是不全面的，并错过了重要的原因，为什么一个规范应该以一种特定的方式个性化。本文为建立并扩展Raz方法的个性化方法进行了辩护。这种做法强调了法律制度的政治重要性，因为它为个性化标准提供了基础。这些标准也与德沃金将法律视为完整性的描述相关，文章认为，这也依赖于对个性化的理解，尽管德沃金的主张与之相反。
{"title":"Taking Identity Seriously: On the Politics of the Individuation of Legal Systems","authors":"Cormac Mac Amhlaigh","doi":"10.1093/ojls/gqab040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab040","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the question of the identity of legal systems of non-monistic accounts of law. It critically analyses approaches to individuation based on validity, the nature of individual norms and the purposes for which they are applied, arguing that the latter approach, as endorsed particularly by Raz, offers the most convincing approach to the question of individuation. The article argues that Raz’s own criterion, however, is under-inclusive and misses important reasons why a norm should be individuated in a particular way. The article defends an approach to individuation which builds upon and expands Raz’s approach. This approach emphasises the political importance of legal systems as providing the basis for criteria of individuation. These criteria are also relevant for Dworkin’s account of law as integrity, which, the article argues, also relies on an understanding of individuation notwithstanding Dworkin’s claims to the contrary.","PeriodicalId":47225,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"53 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138505786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
类型
全部 化学•材料 生命科学 医学 物理 工程技术 环境•农林 材料科学 地球科学 法学 管理学 化学 环境科学与生态学 计算机科学 教育学 经济学 农林科学 人文科学 生物学 数学 物理与天体物理 心理学 综合性期刊 其他 工业工程 理学 历史学 农学 文学 信息工程
数据库
全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley
期刊
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
﹀
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们：info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1