Objective: Handball is a popular team sport with injury risks, especially to the shoulder. This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of prevention programmes in reducing the incidence of shoulder injuries in handball.
Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis.
Data sources: The systematic review was conducted using Embase, PubMed and Cochrane databases with specified keywords.
Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Inclusion criteria encompassed randomised clinical trials focusing on adult and youth handball players, involving a preventive programme with specific exercises to reduce shoulder injuries, with a control group maintaining regular warm-up.
Results and summary: The initial database search identified 224 records (107 articles from Embase, 85 from PubMed and 32 from Cochrane). Five articles met inclusion criteria which recruited 1872 players (977 females/895 males). The programmes were varied but all included muscle strengthening exercises. Depending on the programme, they also incorporated exercises concerning range of motion, scapular, trunk and neuromuscular. Results from three studies included in the meta-analysis showed no significant difference in shoulder injury incidence rates between prevention programme and usual warm-up (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.45 to 1.17; n=747).
Conclusion: This study did not demonstrate the effectiveness of prevention programmes for handball shoulder injuries and emphasises the need for more standardised research protocols to improve knowledge in this area.
{"title":"Shoulder injuries prevention programmes in handball: a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Jules Yonneau, Marie-Martine Lefèvre-Colau, Maxence Compagnat, Jean-Yves Salle, François Rannou, Jean-Christophe Daviet","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002416","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002416","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Handball is a popular team sport with injury risks, especially to the shoulder. This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of prevention programmes in reducing the incidence of shoulder injuries in handball.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review with meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The systematic review was conducted using Embase, PubMed and Cochrane databases with specified keywords.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: </strong>Inclusion criteria encompassed randomised clinical trials focusing on adult and youth handball players, involving a preventive programme with specific exercises to reduce shoulder injuries, with a control group maintaining regular warm-up.</p><p><strong>Results and summary: </strong>The initial database search identified 224 records (107 articles from Embase, 85 from PubMed and 32 from Cochrane). Five articles met inclusion criteria which recruited 1872 players (977 females/895 males). The programmes were varied but all included muscle strengthening exercises. Depending on the programme, they also incorporated exercises concerning range of motion, scapular, trunk and neuromuscular. Results from three studies included in the meta-analysis showed no significant difference in shoulder injury incidence rates between prevention programme and usual warm-up (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.45 to 1.17; n=747).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study did not demonstrate the effectiveness of prevention programmes for handball shoulder injuries and emphasises the need for more standardised research protocols to improve knowledge in this area.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42022356497.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"11 3","pages":"e002416"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481263/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145207776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-25eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002624
Eric G Post, Ashley N Triplett, Travis Anderson, Olivia Samson, Alexis D Gidley, Heather K Vincent, Amber Donaldson, Jonathan Finnoff, William M Adams
Abstract:
Objective: To (1) describe the incidence and characteristics of injuries and illnesses reported by Team USA athletes competing in the 2024 Paris Summer Olympic Games (PSOG) and Paralympic Games (PSPG); (2) compare injury and illness incidence between Olympic and Paralympic cohorts and (3) quantify the burden of respiratory and thermoregulatory illnesses under standard (post-COVID) public health conditions.
Methods: The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) Injury and Illness Surveillance system was used to document the details of all injuries and illnesses reported by any of the 862 athletes, alternates and guides competing for Team USA in the PSOG and PSPG. Illness and injury incidence per 1000 athlete-days (AD) and incidence ratios (IR) were calculated, both with 95% CI.
Results: Team USA Paralympic athletes sustained 20.5 injuries per 1000 AD versus 14.6 among Olympic athletes (IR (95% CI): 1.4 (1.1 to 1.8)). Illness incidence was 15.7 per 1000 AD among Paralympic athletes versus 8.3 in Olympic athletes (IR (95% CI): 1.9 (1.4 to 2.6)). Among Team USA Paralympic athletes, injuries sustained outside of sport settings accounted for 38.5% (30/78) of all Paralympic injuries, the largest single setting category. The most common system affected by illness at both PSOG and PSPG was the respiratory system, with 7.4% of all athletes reporting a respiratory illness. Despite concerns ahead of the Games related to extreme heat, only two (0.3%) Olympic athletes and zero (0.0%) Paralympic athletes from Team USA reported a heat-related illness.
Conclusion: Injury and illness rates were higher among Team USA Paralympic athletes compared with Olympic athletes during the Paris 2024 Games. Respiratory illnesses were the most frequent medical problem, despite a pre-Games prevention campaign, highlighting the need for stronger infection-control strategies at future Games. The absence of heat illness suggests current heat-mitigation measures were effective. Comprehensive injury-prevention and illness-prevention strategies are needed for both Olympic and Paralympic athletes, with additional attention to the environmental and accessibility risks that disproportionately affect Paralympic competitors.
摘要:目的:(1)了解参加2024年巴黎夏季奥运会(PSOG)和残奥会(PSPG)的美国运动员伤病的发生率和特点;(2)比较奥运会和残奥会人群的损伤和疾病发生率;(3)量化标准(后疫情)公共卫生条件下呼吸和体温调节疾病的负担。方法:使用美国奥林匹克和残奥会(USOPC)损伤和疾病监测系统记录862名参加PSOG和PSPG的美国队运动员、替补队员和向导中任何一名报告的所有损伤和疾病的详细情况。计算每1000个运动员日的疾病和损伤发生率(AD)和发病率比(IR),两者的CI均为95%。结果:美国残奥会运动员每1000 AD受伤20.5次,而奥运会运动员每1000 AD受伤14.6次(IR (95% CI): 1.4(1.1 - 1.8))。残奥会运动员的发病率为15.7 / 1000 AD,而奥运会运动员为8.3 / 1000 AD (IR (95% CI): 1.9(1.4 - 2.6))。在美国残奥运动员中,运动环境以外的损伤占所有残奥损伤的38.5%(30/78),是最大的单一环境类别。在PSOG和PSPG中,受疾病影响最常见的系统是呼吸系统,7.4%的运动员报告患有呼吸系统疾病。尽管在奥运会之前就有人担心极端高温,但只有两名(0.3%)奥运会运动员和零名(0.0%)残奥会运动员报告了与高温有关的疾病。结论:2024年巴黎奥运会期间,美国残奥运动员的伤病率高于奥运会运动员。尽管在奥运会前开展了预防运动,但呼吸系统疾病是最常见的医疗问题,这突显出在未来的奥运会中需要加强感染控制战略。没有中暑表明目前的降温措施是有效的。奥运会和残奥会运动员都需要全面的伤害预防和疾病预防策略,并额外关注环境和无障碍风险,这些风险不成比例地影响残奥会运动员。
{"title":"Beyond the field: injury and illness patterns among Team USA athletes at the Paris 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games.","authors":"Eric G Post, Ashley N Triplett, Travis Anderson, Olivia Samson, Alexis D Gidley, Heather K Vincent, Amber Donaldson, Jonathan Finnoff, William M Adams","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002624","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002624","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To (1) describe the incidence and characteristics of injuries and illnesses reported by Team USA athletes competing in the 2024 Paris Summer Olympic Games (PSOG) and Paralympic Games (PSPG); (2) compare injury and illness incidence between Olympic and Paralympic cohorts and (3) quantify the burden of respiratory and thermoregulatory illnesses under standard (post-COVID) public health conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC) Injury and Illness Surveillance system was used to document the details of all injuries and illnesses reported by any of the 862 athletes, alternates and guides competing for Team USA in the PSOG and PSPG. Illness and injury incidence per 1000 athlete-days (AD) and incidence ratios (IR) were calculated, both with 95% CI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Team USA Paralympic athletes sustained 20.5 injuries per 1000 AD versus 14.6 among Olympic athletes (IR (95% CI): 1.4 (1.1 to 1.8)). Illness incidence was 15.7 per 1000 AD among Paralympic athletes versus 8.3 in Olympic athletes (IR (95% CI): 1.9 (1.4 to 2.6)). Among Team USA Paralympic athletes, injuries sustained outside of sport settings accounted for 38.5% (30/78) of all Paralympic injuries, the largest single setting category. The most common system affected by illness at both PSOG and PSPG was the respiratory system, with 7.4% of all athletes reporting a respiratory illness. Despite concerns ahead of the Games related to extreme heat, only two (0.3%) Olympic athletes and zero (0.0%) Paralympic athletes from Team USA reported a heat-related illness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Injury and illness rates were higher among Team USA Paralympic athletes compared with Olympic athletes during the Paris 2024 Games. Respiratory illnesses were the most frequent medical problem, despite a pre-Games prevention campaign, highlighting the need for stronger infection-control strategies at future Games. The absence of heat illness suggests current heat-mitigation measures were effective. Comprehensive injury-prevention and illness-prevention strategies are needed for both Olympic and Paralympic athletes, with additional attention to the environmental and accessibility risks that disproportionately affect Paralympic competitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"11 3","pages":"e002624"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481320/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145207751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-21eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002769
Evert Verhagen, Eva Ferrer, Juliana da Silva Antero, Zoran Bahtijarevic, Ally Barlow, Caroline Bolling, Meritxell Gabarro, Michael Harrison, Priscilla Jarrin, Xanne Janse de Jonge, Emma Paternotte, Rita Tomás, Carlos Jimenez, Nicola Keay, G Lewin, Elke van den Steen, Kirsty Elliott-Sale
Menstrual cycle tracking is increasingly recognised as an important aspect of supporting female athletes. However, its application in football remains inconsistent and under-researched. This consensus statement, initiated by the Union of European Football Associations Medical and Anti-Doping Unit, provides evidence-informed guidance on best practices for menstrual cycle tracking in women's football. Developed using the RAND-UCLA appropriateness method, the consensus involved a multidisciplinary expert panel that reviewed the literature and reached agreement on 82 statements across five key domains: the rationale for tracking, meaningful metrics, appropriate methods, implementation strategies and methodological considerations for research. The consensus underscores that while current evidence linking menstrual cycle phases to performance or injury risk remains inconclusive, tracking can support athlete well-being by identifying menstrual irregularities, managing symptoms and enhancing player education and autonomy. Practical recommendations are provided for measuring cycle characteristics, ovulation, hormonal profiles and symptoms, whereas ethical and cultural considerations are emphasised. This statement aims to promote standardised, athlete-centred tracking protocols and establish priorities for practice and future research in female football.
{"title":"UEFA consensus statement on menstrual cycle tracking in women's football.","authors":"Evert Verhagen, Eva Ferrer, Juliana da Silva Antero, Zoran Bahtijarevic, Ally Barlow, Caroline Bolling, Meritxell Gabarro, Michael Harrison, Priscilla Jarrin, Xanne Janse de Jonge, Emma Paternotte, Rita Tomás, Carlos Jimenez, Nicola Keay, G Lewin, Elke van den Steen, Kirsty Elliott-Sale","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002769","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002769","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Menstrual cycle tracking is increasingly recognised as an important aspect of supporting female athletes. However, its application in football remains inconsistent and under-researched. This consensus statement, initiated by the Union of European Football Associations Medical and Anti-Doping Unit, provides evidence-informed guidance on best practices for menstrual cycle tracking in women's football. Developed using the RAND-UCLA appropriateness method, the consensus involved a multidisciplinary expert panel that reviewed the literature and reached agreement on 82 statements across five key domains: the rationale for tracking, meaningful metrics, appropriate methods, implementation strategies and methodological considerations for research. The consensus underscores that while current evidence linking menstrual cycle phases to performance or injury risk remains inconclusive, tracking can support athlete well-being by identifying menstrual irregularities, managing symptoms and enhancing player education and autonomy. Practical recommendations are provided for measuring cycle characteristics, ovulation, hormonal profiles and symptoms, whereas ethical and cultural considerations are emphasised. This statement aims to promote standardised, athlete-centred tracking protocols and establish priorities for practice and future research in female football.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"11 3","pages":"e002769"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458775/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145151511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-21eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002507
Oriol Bonell Monsonís, Evert Verhagen, Vincent Gouttebarge, Marine Alhammoud, Dave Collins, Lynn Ellenberger, Matthias Gilgien, Matt Jordan, Michael Lasshofer, Gerald Mitterbauer, Abi Okell, Kati Pasanen, Matej Supej, Caroline Bolling, Jörg Spörri
Previous research has shown that stakeholders in the competitive alpine skiing communities consider risk management to be crucial in sports injury prevention. However, to date, there is a lack of a publicly available systematic and structured risk management approach for the competitive alpine skiing context. This work describes the codevelopment process of a risk management framework with stakeholders in the field of competitive alpine skiing. A panel of international experts invited through personal requests and with expertise in health protection and performance enhancement in competitive alpine skiing convened three times through online group meetings to co-develop a risk management framework through different activities. The underlying discussions focused on the fundamental questions of 'why', 'what', 'who', 'how' and 'for whom' and included the debate on specific examples from sports practice. The outcome after three meetings was a risk management framework. This framework includes a competitive alpine skiing-specific prevention wheel that integrates different stakeholder views relevant to different levels, their risk priorities, the main five domains and intervention areas identified from the literature, the graded and progressive timescale to intervene and the potential targets for risk management interventions. Moreover, the framework includes a decision-making tree, which operationalises the prevention wheel into a step-by-step sequence for risk management, including risk identification, risk assessment and risk mitigation. It should help stakeholders recognise their responsibilities and the potential actions they can take. Practical examples are provided to demonstrate how to apply the framework and to illustrate the complexity and dynamic interaction of the various factors in the competitive alpine skiing setting. The risk management framework developed lays a strong foundation for creating a safer environment for alpine skiers. It likewise contributes to providing overall awareness of the complexity and inter-relations of risks and prevention measures in the sport. By doing so, this framework has the potential to initiate further processes and on-field translation to sustainably and long-term improve athlete health and safety in competitive alpine skiing.
{"title":"Risk management framework for competitive alpine skiing-co-developed with stakeholders.","authors":"Oriol Bonell Monsonís, Evert Verhagen, Vincent Gouttebarge, Marine Alhammoud, Dave Collins, Lynn Ellenberger, Matthias Gilgien, Matt Jordan, Michael Lasshofer, Gerald Mitterbauer, Abi Okell, Kati Pasanen, Matej Supej, Caroline Bolling, Jörg Spörri","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002507","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002507","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has shown that stakeholders in the competitive alpine skiing communities consider risk management to be crucial in sports injury prevention. However, to date, there is a lack of a publicly available systematic and structured risk management approach for the competitive alpine skiing context. This work describes the codevelopment process of a risk management framework with stakeholders in the field of competitive alpine skiing. A panel of international experts invited through personal requests and with expertise in health protection and performance enhancement in competitive alpine skiing convened three times through online group meetings to co-develop a risk management framework through different activities. The underlying discussions focused on the fundamental questions of 'why', 'what', 'who', 'how' and 'for whom' and included the debate on specific examples from sports practice. The outcome after three meetings was a risk management framework. This framework includes a competitive alpine skiing-specific prevention wheel that integrates different stakeholder views relevant to different levels, their risk priorities, the main five domains and intervention areas identified from the literature, the graded and progressive timescale to intervene and the potential targets for risk management interventions. Moreover, the framework includes a decision-making tree, which operationalises the prevention wheel into a step-by-step sequence for risk management, including risk identification, risk assessment and risk mitigation. It should help stakeholders recognise their responsibilities and the potential actions they can take. Practical examples are provided to demonstrate how to apply the framework and to illustrate the complexity and dynamic interaction of the various factors in the competitive alpine skiing setting. The risk management framework developed lays a strong foundation for creating a safer environment for alpine skiers. It likewise contributes to providing overall awareness of the complexity and inter-relations of risks and prevention measures in the sport. By doing so, this framework has the potential to initiate further processes and on-field translation to sustainably and long-term improve athlete health and safety in competitive alpine skiing.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"11 3","pages":"e002507"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458822/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145151519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-21eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002545
Debbie Palmer, Torbjorn Soligard, Gwen Fernandes, Dave Collins, Niall Elliott, Paul Kelly, Iain R Murray, Lars Engbretsen
Objective: To describe the prevalence and nature of Olympic-career related injuries and illnesses, and behaviours during injury/illness, in Olympians in the 4 years prior to their participation at the Tokyo 2020 and Beijing 2022 Olympic Games.
Methods: 315 current Olympians from 70 countries completed a cross-sectional online survey, distributed by direct email through National Olympian Associations and World Olympians Association databases. Questions included Olympic sport exposure, significant training and competition injury and illness history (lasting >2 weeks) and athlete behaviours during injury/illness.
Results: 65% of Olympians were women (35% men), representing 51 sports (37 summer, 14 winter), aged 28.6 years (4.6). Overall, 58.5% (95% CI 52.2% to 64.9%) of summer and 55.6% (95% CI 44.7% to 66.4%) of winter Olympians were injured, with knee injuries most frequent (19.6% summer, 27.8% winter Olympians). Injury rates were similar between males and females. 17.1% (95% CI 12.3% to 21.9%) of summer and 23.5% (95% CI 13.1% to 31.3%) of winter Olympians were ill, with respiratory illness most frequent. Illness rates were (non-significantly) higher for female versus male winter Olympians (adjusted relative risk 2.04 (95% CI 0.73 to 5.76)) but similar between male and female summer Olympians. 78% of Olympians said they put the most pressure on themselves to return from injury/illness quickly. Almost half reported using painkillers during injury, while one-quarter continued full training/competition during injury/illness. Injury and illness prevalence followed similar bimodal and trimodal seasonal patterns for summer and winter Olympians, respectively.
Conclusions: Olympians report a significant history of injury and illness across the 4 years before the Olympic Games. A biopsychosocial approach that supports athletes during injury/illness absences is needed. Concurrent injury/illness prevention strategies should be considered to reduce the burden of both injuries and illnesses at key times in an athlete's season.
目的:描述奥运会运动员参加2020年东京奥运会和2022年北京奥运会前4年与奥运会职业生涯相关的伤害和疾病的患病率和性质,以及受伤/疾病期间的行为。方法:来自70个国家的315名现役奥运选手完成了一项横断面在线调查,通过国家奥林匹克协会和世界奥林匹克协会的数据库直接发送电子邮件。问题包括奥林匹克运动暴露,重大训练和比赛损伤和疾病史(持续bb10 - 2周)以及运动员在损伤/疾病期间的行为。结果:65%的奥运选手为女性(35%为男性),代表51个项目(37个夏季项目,14个冬季项目),年龄28.6岁(4.6岁)。总体而言,58.5% (95% CI 52.2% ~ 64.9%)的夏季奥运会运动员和55.6% (95% CI 44.7% ~ 66.4%)的冬季奥运会运动员受伤,其中膝关节损伤最为常见(夏季奥运会运动员19.6%,冬季奥运会运动员27.8%)。男性和女性的受伤率相似。17.1%(95%可信区间12.3% ~ 21.9%)的夏季奥运会运动员和23.5%(95%可信区间13.1% ~ 31.3%)的冬季奥运会运动员患病,其中呼吸系统疾病最为常见。冬季奥运会女性运动员的患病率(无显著性)高于男性运动员(调整后的相对风险为2.04 (95% CI 0.73至5.76)),但夏季奥运会男性和女性运动员之间的患病率相似。78%的奥运会运动员表示,他们给自己施加了最大的压力,以便尽快从伤病中恢复过来。几乎一半的人在受伤期间使用止痛药,而四分之一的人在受伤/生病期间继续进行全面训练/比赛。夏季和冬季奥运会运动员的伤害和疾病患病率分别遵循类似的双峰和三峰季节性模式。结论:奥运选手在奥运会前的4年里都有明显的伤病史。需要一种支持运动员在受伤/疾病缺席期间的生物-心理-社会方法。在运动员赛季的关键时刻,应该考虑同时预防伤病的策略,以减轻伤病的负担。
{"title":"Insights from the first IOC Olympian Health Cohort: injury and illness in Olympians preparing for the Tokyo 2020 Summer and Beijing 2022 Winter Olympic Games.","authors":"Debbie Palmer, Torbjorn Soligard, Gwen Fernandes, Dave Collins, Niall Elliott, Paul Kelly, Iain R Murray, Lars Engbretsen","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002545","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002545","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the prevalence and nature of Olympic-career related injuries and illnesses, and behaviours during injury/illness, in Olympians in the 4 years prior to their participation at the Tokyo 2020 and Beijing 2022 Olympic Games.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>315 current Olympians from 70 countries completed a cross-sectional online survey, distributed by direct email through National Olympian Associations and World Olympians Association databases. Questions included Olympic sport exposure, significant training and competition injury and illness history (lasting >2 weeks) and athlete behaviours during injury/illness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>65% of Olympians were women (35% men), representing 51 sports (37 summer, 14 winter), aged 28.6 years (4.6). Overall, 58.5% (95% CI 52.2% to 64.9%) of summer and 55.6% (95% CI 44.7% to 66.4%) of winter Olympians were injured, with knee injuries most frequent (19.6% summer, 27.8% winter Olympians). Injury rates were similar between males and females. 17.1% (95% CI 12.3% to 21.9%) of summer and 23.5% (95% CI 13.1% to 31.3%) of winter Olympians were ill, with respiratory illness most frequent. Illness rates were (non-significantly) higher for female versus male winter Olympians (adjusted relative risk 2.04 (95% CI 0.73 to 5.76)) but similar between male and female summer Olympians. 78% of Olympians said they put the most pressure on themselves to return from injury/illness quickly. Almost half reported using painkillers during injury, while one-quarter continued full training/competition during injury/illness. Injury and illness prevalence followed similar bimodal and trimodal seasonal patterns for summer and winter Olympians, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Olympians report a significant history of injury and illness across the 4 years before the Olympic Games. A biopsychosocial approach that supports athletes during injury/illness absences is needed. Concurrent injury/illness prevention strategies should be considered to reduce the burden of both injuries and illnesses at key times in an athlete's season.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"11 3","pages":"e002545"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458888/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145151435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-17eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002560
Gemma Knight, Liam Colbert, Omar Heyward, Ben Jones, Carolyn A Emery, Simon Roberts, Keith A Stokes, Stephen W West
Background and aims: Within adolescent female rugby union, various effective injury prevention strategies are available to players to mitigate injury. However, little is known regarding the players' attitudes, beliefs and behaviours towards those strategies, as well as injuries. The primary aim of the study was to investigate the attitudes, beliefs, behaviours and injury-reporting behaviours of adolescent female rugby players regarding injury and injury prevention strategies. The secondary aim was to examine associations between individual factors (eg, player demographics) and injury-reporting behaviours.
Methods: Participants completed an online cross-sectional survey and were recruited from under-16 and under-18 rugby teams in schools/colleges, clubs and developing player pathway programmes in England.
Results: 1062 players were contacted to participate, 424 responded and 422 met the eligibility criteria; 79 participants had incomplete responses. 14% of players had not previously reported a suspected concussion to a coach/medical staff member, and 37% of players had previously not reported sustaining one or more musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries to a coach/medical staff member. Factors cited for non-disclosure of concussion and MSK injuries included not wanting to miss rugby sessions (43% and 39%) and not knowing that symptom(s) were related to an injury (11% and 17%). Players held positive attitudes, beliefs and behaviours towards injury and injury prevention, but their understanding of the effectiveness of protective equipment varied.
Conclusion: This study provides a greater understanding of adolescent female rugby players' attitudes, beliefs and behaviours towards injury and injury prevention and aids in the development of effective injury prevention initiatives.
{"title":"Adolescent female rugby union players' attitudes, beliefs and behaviours towards injury and injury prevention strategies in England.","authors":"Gemma Knight, Liam Colbert, Omar Heyward, Ben Jones, Carolyn A Emery, Simon Roberts, Keith A Stokes, Stephen W West","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002560","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002560","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Within adolescent female rugby union, various effective injury prevention strategies are available to players to mitigate injury. However, little is known regarding the players' attitudes, beliefs and behaviours towards those strategies, as well as injuries. The primary aim of the study was to investigate the attitudes, beliefs, behaviours and injury-reporting behaviours of adolescent female rugby players regarding injury and injury prevention strategies. The secondary aim was to examine associations between individual factors (eg, player demographics) and injury-reporting behaviours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants completed an online cross-sectional survey and were recruited from under-16 and under-18 rugby teams in schools/colleges, clubs and developing player pathway programmes in England.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1062 players were contacted to participate, 424 responded and 422 met the eligibility criteria; 79 participants had incomplete responses. 14% of players had not previously reported a suspected concussion to a coach/medical staff member, and 37% of players had previously not reported sustaining one or more musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries to a coach/medical staff member. Factors cited for non-disclosure of concussion and MSK injuries included not wanting to miss rugby sessions (43% and 39%) and not knowing that symptom(s) were related to an injury (11% and 17%). Players held positive attitudes, beliefs and behaviours towards injury and injury prevention, but their understanding of the effectiveness of protective equipment varied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides a greater understanding of adolescent female rugby players' attitudes, beliefs and behaviours towards injury and injury prevention and aids in the development of effective injury prevention initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"11 3","pages":"e002560"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458813/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145151486","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-10eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002573
Isla J Shill, Stephen W West, Jean-Michel Galarneau, Julia Omokuale, Sharief Hendricks, Ian Pike, Debbie Palmer, Keith A Stokes, Brent E Hagel, Carolyn A Emery
Objectives: To evaluate the association between tackle characteristics and suspected concussion among Canadian high school girls' rugby union players.
Methods: A case-control video-analysis study was used to examine the association between a priori tackle characteristics (eg, type, height, head position) and suspected concussion. For every concussive tackle event, six non-concussive tackle events were matched for game and team. Penalised logistic regression was used to estimate ORs with 95% CIs for concussion given tackle characteristics.
Results: 33 concussive tackle events, including 38 concussions, were identified. 20 were ball carrier concussions (53%). 261 (228 non-concussive, 33 concussive) tackle events, including 632 individual tackler and ball carrier instances, were coded. All ball carrier head contact intensity types were associated with concussion compared with no head contact. A trip tackle type (OR: 4.41, 95% CI 1.25 to 15.61), illegal tackle type (OR: 4.41, 95% CI 2.67 to 7.29), deceleration (OR: 14.03, 95% CI 4.65 to 42.30) and no change of speed (OR: 18.81, 95% CI 10.04 to 35.24) increased concussion odds for ball carriers. A tap (OR: 10.64, 95% CI 2.00 to 56.62) and trip tackle type (OR: 5.91, 95% CI 3.18 to 10.99), two (OR: 3.38, 95% CI 1.13 to 10.07) or three (OR: 13.91, 95% CI 1.74 to 111.53) tacklers within the event, and a head-down position (OR: 40.54, 95% CI 27.78 to 59.18) increased concussion odds for tacklers. Higher tackler contact on ball carrier (tackle height) increased concussion odds for ball carrier (reference: knee-to-upper-leg; waist-to-sternum OR: 2.27, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.80; sternum-to-armpit OR: 5.65, 95% CI 1.40 to 22.87) and tacklers (sternum-to-armpit OR: 4.20, 95% CI 1.26 to 14.03).
Conclusion: Numerous tackle characteristics were associated with ball carrier and tackler concussion. This is the first study to identify tackle height on ball carrier as a risk factor for concussion in girls' rugby. Future directions should consider tackle training programmes and lower tackle height as potential concussion prevention solutions.
目的:探讨加拿大高中女子橄榄球运动员铲球特征与疑似脑震荡的关系。方法:采用病例对照视频分析研究来检验先验铲球特征(如类型、高度、头部位置)与疑似脑震荡之间的关系。对于每一个震荡铲球事件,有6个非震荡铲球事件与比赛和球队相匹配。在给定铲球特征的情况下,使用惩罚逻辑回归估计95% ci的ORs。结果:共发现33例脑震荡铲球事件,其中脑震荡38例。20例为带球性脑震荡(53%)。261个(228个非脑震荡,33个脑震荡)铲球事件,包括632个个人铲球者和持球者的例子,被编码。与无头部接触相比,所有持球者的头部接触强度类型都与脑震荡有关。绊倒铲球类型(OR: 4.41, 95% CI 1.25至15.61)、非法铲球类型(OR: 4.41, 95% CI 2.67至7.29)、减速(OR: 14.03, 95% CI 4.65至42.30)和速度不变(OR: 18.81, 95% CI 10.04至35.24)增加了持球者脑震荡的几率。一个铲球(OR: 10.64, 95% CI 2.00至56.62)和绊倒铲球类型(OR: 5.91, 95% CI 3.18至10.99),两个(OR: 3.38, 95% CI 1.13至10.07)或三个(OR: 13.91, 95% CI 1.74至111.53)铲球者在比赛中,以及头下位(OR: 40.54, 95% CI 27.78至59.18)增加了铲球者脑震荡的几率。铲球者与持球者的高接触(铲球高度)增加了持球者(参考:膝盖到大腿;腰到胸骨的比值:2.27,95% CI 1.08至4.80;胸骨到腋窝的比值:5.65,95% CI 1.40至22.87)和铲球者(胸骨到腋窝的比值:4.20,95% CI 1.26至14.03)脑震荡的几率。结论:许多铲球特征与持球者和铲球者脑震荡有关。这是第一个确定持球者的铲球高度是女孩橄榄球脑震荡的危险因素的研究。未来的方向应该考虑铲球训练计划和降低铲球高度作为潜在的脑震荡预防解决方案。
{"title":"Tackle characteristics and suspected concussion: recommendations to improve high school girls' rugby tackle safety.","authors":"Isla J Shill, Stephen W West, Jean-Michel Galarneau, Julia Omokuale, Sharief Hendricks, Ian Pike, Debbie Palmer, Keith A Stokes, Brent E Hagel, Carolyn A Emery","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002573","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002573","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the association between tackle characteristics and suspected concussion among Canadian high school girls' rugby union players.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case-control video-analysis study was used to examine the association between a priori tackle characteristics (eg, type, height, head position) and suspected concussion. For every concussive tackle event, six non-concussive tackle events were matched for game and team. Penalised logistic regression was used to estimate ORs with 95% CIs for concussion given tackle characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>33 concussive tackle events, including 38 concussions, were identified. 20 were ball carrier concussions (53%). 261 (228 non-concussive, 33 concussive) tackle events, including 632 individual tackler and ball carrier instances, were coded. All ball carrier head contact intensity types were associated with concussion compared with no head contact. A trip tackle type (OR: 4.41, 95% CI 1.25 to 15.61), illegal tackle type (OR: 4.41, 95% CI 2.67 to 7.29), deceleration (OR: 14.03, 95% CI 4.65 to 42.30) and no change of speed (OR: 18.81, 95% CI 10.04 to 35.24) increased concussion odds for ball carriers. A tap (OR: 10.64, 95% CI 2.00 to 56.62) and trip tackle type (OR: 5.91, 95% CI 3.18 to 10.99), two (OR: 3.38, 95% CI 1.13 to 10.07) or three (OR: 13.91, 95% CI 1.74 to 111.53) tacklers within the event, and a head-down position (OR: 40.54, 95% CI 27.78 to 59.18) increased concussion odds for tacklers. Higher tackler contact on ball carrier (tackle height) increased concussion odds for ball carrier (reference: knee-to-upper-leg; waist-to-sternum OR: 2.27, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.80; sternum-to-armpit OR: 5.65, 95% CI 1.40 to 22.87) and tacklers (sternum-to-armpit OR: 4.20, 95% CI 1.26 to 14.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Numerous tackle characteristics were associated with ball carrier and tackler concussion. This is the first study to identify tackle height on ball carrier as a risk factor for concussion in girls' rugby. Future directions should consider tackle training programmes and lower tackle height as potential concussion prevention solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"11 3","pages":"e002573"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12519360/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145304014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-10eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002102
Nicole Gwynne-Mayer, Avril E Drummond, Jennie Hancox, Wafa Alrubaia, Ian M Taylor
Objectives: To identify how exercise adherence is reported in research which focuses on enhancing cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness in stroke survivors.
Design: Systematic scoping review.
Data sources: Scopus, PubMED/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO/PsycARTICLES and Web of Science.
Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: The review sought published reports involving a cardiorespiratory or resistance training exercise intervention for people who experienced a stroke ≥6 months prior to participation. Reports were screened by two reviewers and were assessed for methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
Results: 37 reports (randomised trials=30, interventions without control=5, non-randomised trial=1, dose escalation trial=1; total n=1347 participants) out of 6732 records met the inclusion criteria. 29 reports (78%) documented intervention adherence by describing participant completion rates, indicating 65-100% adherence. Exercise session adherence within intervention was identifiable in 16 reports (43%), 12 of which recorded session attendance, signifying 61-100% adherence. There were also measures of the intensity or duration participants sustained during sessions in 14 studies. Only one study measured postintervention (ie, at least 3 months after intervention completion) exercise adherence, and two studies actively supported participants' exercise motivation.
Conclusion: Adherence is commonly measured by intervention completion rates. Despite its importance for intervention effectiveness, less than half of studies measured exercise session adherence within interventions. Future research should address this limitation to better understand how stroke survivors engage with exercise.
目的:确定运动依从性是如何在研究中报告的,该研究的重点是增强中风幸存者的心肺和肌肉健康。设计:系统的范围审查。数据来源:Scopus, PubMED/MEDLINE, Cochrane中央对照试验登记,护理和相关健康文献累积索引,PsycINFO/PsycARTICLES和Web of Science。研究的入选标准:本综述收集了已发表的涉及心肺或阻力训练干预的报告,这些患者在参与研究前≥6个月发生过卒中。报告由两名审稿人筛选,并使用混合方法评估工具评估方法学质量。结果:6732份记录中有37份报告(随机试验=30,无对照干预=5,非随机试验=1,剂量递增试验=1,总n=1347名受试者)符合纳入标准。29份报告(78%)通过描述参与者的完成率记录了干预依从性,表明65-100%的依从性。在16份报告(43%)中可以确定干预期间的锻炼依从性,其中12份报告记录了锻炼出勤率,表明61-100%的依从性。在14项研究中,还测量了参与者在会议中持续的强度或持续时间。只有一项研究测量了干预后(即干预完成后至少3个月)的运动依从性,两项研究积极支持参与者的运动动机。结论:依从性通常通过干预完成率来衡量。尽管它对干预效果很重要,但只有不到一半的研究在干预措施中测量了锻炼的坚持程度。未来的研究应该解决这一限制,以更好地了解中风幸存者如何进行运动。
{"title":"Adherence to exercise rehabilitation programmes in stroke survivors: a scoping review.","authors":"Nicole Gwynne-Mayer, Avril E Drummond, Jennie Hancox, Wafa Alrubaia, Ian M Taylor","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002102","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002102","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify how exercise adherence is reported in research which focuses on enhancing cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness in stroke survivors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic scoping review.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Scopus, PubMED/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO/PsycARTICLES and Web of Science.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: </strong>The review sought published reports involving a cardiorespiratory or resistance training exercise intervention for people who experienced a stroke ≥6 months prior to participation. Reports were screened by two reviewers and were assessed for methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>37 reports (randomised trials=30, interventions without control=5, non-randomised trial=1, dose escalation trial=1; total n=1347 participants) out of 6732 records met the inclusion criteria. 29 reports (78%) documented intervention adherence by describing participant completion rates, indicating 65-100% adherence. <i>Exercise session</i> adherence within intervention was identifiable in 16 reports (43%), 12 of which recorded session attendance, signifying 61-100% adherence. There were also measures of the intensity or duration participants sustained during sessions in 14 studies. Only one study measured postintervention (ie, at least 3 months after intervention completion) exercise adherence, and two studies actively supported participants' exercise motivation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adherence is commonly measured by intervention completion rates. Despite its importance for intervention effectiveness, less than half of studies measured exercise session adherence within interventions. Future research should address this limitation to better understand how stroke survivors engage with exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"11 3","pages":"e002102"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12519362/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145304001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-09eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002649
Tania Nilsson, Dan Fransson, Mats Borjesson, Matilda Lundblad, Andreas Ivarsson
Objectives: Hamstring strain injury (HSI) is the most common time-loss injury in football and is prone to recurrence. This exploratory study aimed to describe the relationship between short-term external training load (TL) and HSI occurrence in male senior football players at the professional level.
Methods: TL data in terms of global positioning system (GPS) variables and HSI incidence were collected over four seasons from 25 senior professional football players. GPS variables included total distance (TD), very intense accelerations (>3.00 m/s²), very intense decelerations (<-3.00 m/s²), high-speed running distance (>19.8 km/hour), maximal sprint distance (>29.8 km/hour) and maximal velocity. For each injury case, TL during the 7 and 14 days preceding the injury was compared with matched control periods from the same player.
Results: 25 hamstring injuries were included for analysis. Large interindividual variation in TL patterns was observed, with some players exhibiting higher and others lower TL in the periods preceding injury compared with control periods. No consistent group-level trends were identified between injured and control periods.
Conclusion: This exploratory study found considerable individual variability in TL prior to HSI and no clear group-level patterns. These findings suggest that short-term TL metrics alone may have limited utility in predicting HSI risk at the group level in professional football players.
{"title":"Hamstring injury risk in male professional football: do external training loads play a role?","authors":"Tania Nilsson, Dan Fransson, Mats Borjesson, Matilda Lundblad, Andreas Ivarsson","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002649","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002649","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hamstring strain injury (HSI) is the most common time-loss injury in football and is prone to recurrence. This exploratory study aimed to describe the relationship between short-term external training load (TL) and HSI occurrence in male senior football players at the professional level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TL data in terms of global positioning system (GPS) variables and HSI incidence were collected over four seasons from 25 senior professional football players. GPS variables included total distance (TD), very intense accelerations (>3.00 m/s²), very intense decelerations (<-3.00 m/s²), high-speed running distance (>19.8 km/hour), maximal sprint distance (>29.8 km/hour) and maximal velocity. For each injury case, TL during the 7 and 14 days preceding the injury was compared with matched control periods from the same player.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>25 hamstring injuries were included for analysis. Large interindividual variation in TL patterns was observed, with some players exhibiting higher and others lower TL in the periods preceding injury compared with control periods. No consistent group-level trends were identified between injured and control periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This exploratory study found considerable individual variability in TL prior to HSI and no clear group-level patterns. These findings suggest that short-term TL metrics alone may have limited utility in predicting HSI risk at the group level in professional football players.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"11 3","pages":"e002649"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421611/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145042115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Injury surveillance is fundamental for understanding and managing risks in elite football. The simultaneous organisation of Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) EURO 2024 and Confederación Sudamericana de Fútbol (CONMEBOL) Copa America 2024 created a unique chance to use a standardised method across two major men's tournaments, providing descriptive insights into injury rates and patterns in various competitive settings.
Objective: To analyse the incidence, severity and burden of time-loss injuries across both tournaments.
Methods: A prospective injury surveillance study was conducted using standardised methodologies from UEFA's Elite Club Injury Study and International Olympic Committee reporting guidelines. Injury incidence rates (IRs) were calculated per 1000 hours of exposure, and injury burden was measured in tournament days lost per 1000 hours.
Results: A total of 85 injuries were recorded, resulting in an overall IR of 4.0 per 1000 hours (95% CI: 3.1 to 4.8). Match injury rates (16.3 per 1000 hours; 95% CI: 11.9 to 20.7) were significantly higher than training rates (1.8 per 1000 hours; 95% CI: 1.2 to 2.4). Injury rates were comparable between UEFA EURO (3.9 per 1000 hours; 95% CI: 2.9 to 4.9) and CONMEBOL Copa America (4.2 per 1000 hours; 95% CI: 2.6 to 5.7). The injury burden was higher in UEFA EURO (30.0 vs 18.3 days lost per 1000 hours). Muscle injuries (58%) and lower extremity injuries (86%) were the most common.
Conclusions: Injury patterns were broadly similar across tournaments, with lower extremity injuries, particularly muscle injuries, being the most common. The study highlights the presence and impact of pre-existing injuries on player availability and underscores the practical value of harmonised injury surveillance, even in small sample contexts, to enhance international data comparability and support future multi-tournament analyses.
{"title":"Injury incidence and patterns in men's UEFA EURO 2024 and CONMEBOL Copa America 2024: descriptive findings from two simultaneously staged tournaments.","authors":"Evert Verhagen, Katrine Okholm Kryger, Zoran Bahtijarevic, Osvaldo Pangrazio, Francisco Forriol","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002671","DOIUrl":"10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002671","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Injury surveillance is fundamental for understanding and managing risks in elite football. The simultaneous organisation of Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) EURO 2024 and Confederación Sudamericana de Fútbol (CONMEBOL) Copa America 2024 created a unique chance to use a standardised method across two major men's tournaments, providing descriptive insights into injury rates and patterns in various competitive settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyse the incidence, severity and burden of time-loss injuries across both tournaments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective injury surveillance study was conducted using standardised methodologies from UEFA's Elite Club Injury Study and International Olympic Committee reporting guidelines. Injury incidence rates (IRs) were calculated per 1000 hours of exposure, and injury burden was measured in tournament days lost per 1000 hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 85 injuries were recorded, resulting in an overall IR of 4.0 per 1000 hours (95% CI: 3.1 to 4.8). Match injury rates (16.3 per 1000 hours; 95% CI: 11.9 to 20.7) were significantly higher than training rates (1.8 per 1000 hours; 95% CI: 1.2 to 2.4). Injury rates were comparable between UEFA EURO (3.9 per 1000 hours; 95% CI: 2.9 to 4.9) and CONMEBOL Copa America (4.2 per 1000 hours; 95% CI: 2.6 to 5.7). The injury burden was higher in UEFA EURO (30.0 vs 18.3 days lost per 1000 hours). Muscle injuries (58%) and lower extremity injuries (86%) were the most common.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Injury patterns were broadly similar across tournaments, with lower extremity injuries, particularly muscle injuries, being the most common. The study highlights the presence and impact of pre-existing injuries on player availability and underscores the practical value of harmonised injury surveillance, even in small sample contexts, to enhance international data comparability and support future multi-tournament analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"11 3","pages":"e002671"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12421589/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145041802","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}