首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Research on Technology in Education最新文献

英文 中文
Parent use of and beliefs about technology for education and parenting: Year 1 results from the HCS EdConnect study 父母对教育和育儿技术的使用和信念:HCS EdConnect研究的第一年结果
2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2023.2276410
Damian Bebell, Zhexun (Cinna) Xin, Gareth Cleveland, Michael Russell
AbstractIn May 2021, a survey was conducted with a random sample of 416 households stratified across levels of community broadband participation. Results show racialized/ethnic categorization and program enrollment had a small significant relationship with parents’ use of technology and a more nuanced relationship with parents’ beliefs about educational technology. Results suggest that participating in the community broadband initiative is associated positively with parents’ practices and attitudes. Moreover, practices were similar across households regardless of racialized/ethnic categorization, suggesting that household participation in the broadband program may be beginning to correct for racialized inequities in parents’ access, use, and attitudes.Keywords: Educational technologyparentscommunity broadbanddigital equityhousehold survey Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author Damian Bebell at bebell@bc.edu. A data dashboard using the same data supporting the findings of this study is publicly available at https://edconnect.bc.edu/#/.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Enterprise Center under Grant number 5111961.Notes on contributorsDamian BebellDamian Bebell is an Assistant Research Professor at Boston College’s Lynch School of Education and Human Development. Damian designs and conducts research on the implementation and impacts of educational technology around the world and is interested in furthering technology to improve educational research, measurement, and reflection.Zhexun (Cinna) XinZhexun (Cinna) Xin is a doctoral student in the Measurement, Evaluation, Statistics, and Assessment (MESA) program at Boston College. She is also a Research Assistant in the EdConnect evaluation study. She collects and builds a database of literature related to educational technology and the digital divide. She also assists with instrument development and data analysis. Her research interests focus on innovative measurement via technology, instrument development for psychological constructs, and program evaluation.Gareth ClevelandGareth Cleveland is a Research Associate in the Lynch School of Education and Human Development at Boston College. In his work on the EdConnect evaluation, he has focused on data management and analysis, including describing and modeling the way that parents think about and use technology. Gareth’s interests include leveraging education data to support local decision makers and improving processes for collecting and sharing data.Michael RussellMichael Russell is a Professor of Measurement, Evaluation, Statistics and Assessment in the Lynch School of Education and Human Development at Boston College. His current work focuses on the intersection of systemic racism and educational assessment.
摘要/ abstract摘要:本文于2021年5月对416个家庭进行了随机抽样调查,按社区宽带参与水平分层。结果显示,种族/民族分类和项目招生与父母使用技术有微小的显著关系,与父母对教育技术的信念有更微妙的关系。结果表明,参与社区宽带计划与家长的做法和态度呈正相关。此外,无论种族/民族分类如何,家庭间的做法都是相似的,这表明家庭参与宽带计划可能开始纠正父母在接入、使用和态度上的种族不平等。关键词:教育技术家长社区宽带数字股权家庭调查披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。数据可用性声明支持本研究结果的数据可从通讯作者Damian Bebell处获取bebell@bc.edu。使用支持本研究结果的相同数据的数据仪表板可在https://edconnect.bc.edu/#/.Additional上公开获取。本工作由企业中心根据授予号5111961支持。作者简介达米安·贝贝尔是波士顿学院林奇教育与人类发展学院的助理研究教授。Damian设计并研究了世界各地教育技术的实施和影响,并对进一步提高教育研究、测量和反思的技术感兴趣。XinZhexun (Cinna) XinZhexun (Cinna) Xin是波士顿学院测量、评估、统计与评估(MESA)专业的博士生。她也是EdConnect评估研究的研究助理。她收集并建立了一个与教育技术和数字鸿沟相关的文献数据库。她还协助仪器开发和数据分析。她的研究兴趣集中在创新测量技术,心理结构的仪器开发和项目评估。Gareth Cleveland是波士顿学院林奇教育与人类发展学院的研究员。在他对EdConnect评估的工作中,他专注于数据管理和分析,包括描述和建模父母思考和使用技术的方式。Gareth的兴趣包括利用教育数据来支持当地决策者,以及改进收集和共享数据的流程。Michael Russell是波士顿学院林奇教育与人类发展学院测量、评估、统计与评估教授。他目前的工作重点是系统性种族主义和教育评估的交叉。
{"title":"Parent use of and beliefs about technology for education and parenting: Year 1 results from the HCS EdConnect study","authors":"Damian Bebell, Zhexun (Cinna) Xin, Gareth Cleveland, Michael Russell","doi":"10.1080/15391523.2023.2276410","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2276410","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn May 2021, a survey was conducted with a random sample of 416 households stratified across levels of community broadband participation. Results show racialized/ethnic categorization and program enrollment had a small significant relationship with parents’ use of technology and a more nuanced relationship with parents’ beliefs about educational technology. Results suggest that participating in the community broadband initiative is associated positively with parents’ practices and attitudes. Moreover, practices were similar across households regardless of racialized/ethnic categorization, suggesting that household participation in the broadband program may be beginning to correct for racialized inequities in parents’ access, use, and attitudes.Keywords: Educational technologyparentscommunity broadbanddigital equityhousehold survey Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author Damian Bebell at bebell@bc.edu. A data dashboard using the same data supporting the findings of this study is publicly available at https://edconnect.bc.edu/#/.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Enterprise Center under Grant number 5111961.Notes on contributorsDamian BebellDamian Bebell is an Assistant Research Professor at Boston College’s Lynch School of Education and Human Development. Damian designs and conducts research on the implementation and impacts of educational technology around the world and is interested in furthering technology to improve educational research, measurement, and reflection.Zhexun (Cinna) XinZhexun (Cinna) Xin is a doctoral student in the Measurement, Evaluation, Statistics, and Assessment (MESA) program at Boston College. She is also a Research Assistant in the EdConnect evaluation study. She collects and builds a database of literature related to educational technology and the digital divide. She also assists with instrument development and data analysis. Her research interests focus on innovative measurement via technology, instrument development for psychological constructs, and program evaluation.Gareth ClevelandGareth Cleveland is a Research Associate in the Lynch School of Education and Human Development at Boston College. In his work on the EdConnect evaluation, he has focused on data management and analysis, including describing and modeling the way that parents think about and use technology. Gareth’s interests include leveraging education data to support local decision makers and improving processes for collecting and sharing data.Michael RussellMichael Russell is a Professor of Measurement, Evaluation, Statistics and Assessment in the Lynch School of Education and Human Development at Boston College. His current work focuses on the intersection of systemic racism and educational assessment.","PeriodicalId":47444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Technology in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136281659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An examination of middle school student learner characteristics as related to the reuse and remixing of code in two different computer science learning contexts 在两种不同的计算机科学学习环境中,研究与代码的重复使用和再混合相关的中学生学习者特征
IF 5.1 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2022.2085215
T. Ketenci, Brendan Calandra, J. Cohen, Maggie Renken, Nurjamal Chonoeva
Abstract The goal of this study was to examine how two groups of middle school students’ self-efficacy, interest, goal orientation, and prior experience related to evidence of their building upon existing ideas and code in digital artifacts they created using MIT’s App Inventor, a computational practice that Brennan and Resnick (2012) identified as “reusing and remixing.” Participants included 110 students in a formal computer science education course and 87 students in an after-school computing club. Data sources included a learner profile survey and participants’ digital artifacts. Correlational analysis, followed by logistic regression analysis, uncovered significant relationships between self-efficacy, goal orientation, and evidence of participants’ code-oriented reusing and remixing their digital artifacts.
摘要 本研究旨在考察两组中学生的自我效能感、兴趣、目标导向和先前经验如何与他们在使用麻省理工学院的 App Inventor 创建的数字作品中借鉴现有想法和代码的证据相关联,这种计算实践被 Brennan 和 Resnick(2012 年)认定为 "重复使用和混搭"。参与者包括参加正规计算机科学教育课程的 110 名学生和参加课后计算机俱乐部的 87 名学生。数据来源包括学习者概况调查和参与者的数字作品。相关分析和逻辑回归分析揭示了自我效能感、目标导向和参与者以代码为导向的数字作品再利用和再混合证据之间的显著关系。
{"title":"An examination of middle school student learner characteristics as related to the reuse and remixing of code in two different computer science learning contexts","authors":"T. Ketenci, Brendan Calandra, J. Cohen, Maggie Renken, Nurjamal Chonoeva","doi":"10.1080/15391523.2022.2085215","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2085215","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The goal of this study was to examine how two groups of middle school students’ self-efficacy, interest, goal orientation, and prior experience related to evidence of their building upon existing ideas and code in digital artifacts they created using MIT’s App Inventor, a computational practice that Brennan and Resnick (2012) identified as “reusing and remixing.” Participants included 110 students in a formal computer science education course and 87 students in an after-school computing club. Data sources included a learner profile survey and participants’ digital artifacts. Correlational analysis, followed by logistic regression analysis, uncovered significant relationships between self-efficacy, goal orientation, and evidence of participants’ code-oriented reusing and remixing their digital artifacts.","PeriodicalId":47444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Technology in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139296985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
TeRMEd: a framework for educators to aid in the design and evaluation of technology-enhanced resources in mathematics 术语:一个框架,教育工作者帮助设计和评估技术增强的数学资源
2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2023.2267698
Caitríona Ní Shé, Eabhnat Ní Fhloinn, Ciarán Mac an Bhaird
{"title":"TeRMEd: a framework for educators to aid in the design and evaluation of technology-enhanced resources in mathematics","authors":"Caitríona Ní Shé, Eabhnat Ní Fhloinn, Ciarán Mac an Bhaird","doi":"10.1080/15391523.2023.2267698","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2267698","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Technology in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136104592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A research-based conceptual framework for inclusive K-12 online, distance, and digital education 基于研究的包容性K-12在线、远程和数字教育概念框架
2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2023.2264982
Mary F. Rice, Kiernan Cantergiani, Danielle Macias
AbstractK-12 students who were identified or at risk of being identified as having disabilities had been entering learning environments that were fully or partially online. The increase in participation of this population and the emergency circumstances during COVID-19 pandemic-related school building closures brought a need for research into what supports students in the full range of digital environments. The purpose of this article is to propose a research-based conceptual framework for Inclusive Online, Distance and Digital Education (IODDE) in K-12 settings. IODDE focuses on learners’ biopsychosocial needs alongside two major types of supports: policy supports, and direct learner supports. There are also two types of crucial access: digital access and instructional access. Ensuring learners’ success requires contexts where access and supports are in balance with learner needs.Keywords: Inclusive online educationsupporting students with disabilities onlineonline special educationdigital education for all Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsMary F. RiceMary Rice, PhD in Curriculum & Teaching, has taught children in grades 3-12, but mostly grades 7-9. Mary has developed a research and teaching focus on the design and doing of inclusive online, distance, and digital education and the shared roles and responsibilities that make these experiences educative.Kiernan CantergianiKiernan Cantergiani, MA in Instructional Technology, is a former middle school teacher and current doctoral student. Kiernan’s research focuses on adolescent literacy using digital storytelling.Danielle MaciasDanielle Macias, MA in Learning Design and Technology, has been in education for 10 years Danielle has served in several roles including high school English teacher, adult ESL teacher, state education officer, and Innovative Learning Coach.
摘要k -12年级的学生已经进入了完全或部分在线的学习环境,这些学生被确定为或有被确定为有残疾的风险。由于这一群体参与人数的增加以及与COVID-19大流行相关的校舍关闭期间的紧急情况,需要研究在各种数字环境中为学生提供支持的因素。本文的目的是为K-12环境中的包容性在线、远程和数字教育(IODDE)提出一个基于研究的概念框架。IODDE侧重于学习者的生物心理社会需求以及两种主要支持类型:政策支持和直接学习者支持。还有两种重要的访问方式:数字访问和教学访问。确保学习者的成功需要与学习者的需求相平衡的访问和支持环境。关键词:全纳在线教育支持残疾学生在线特殊教育全民数字教育披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。作者简介:mary F. Rice,课程与教学博士,教过3-12年级的孩子,但主要是7-9年级。玛丽的研究和教学重点是包容性在线、远程和数字教育的设计和实施,以及使这些经历具有教育意义的共同角色和责任。Kiernan Cantergiani,教学技术硕士,曾是一名中学教师,现为博士生。基尔南的研究重点是利用数字故事讲述青少年的读写能力。Danielle Macias,学习设计和技术硕士,从事教育工作10年,担任过高中英语教师、成人ESL教师、州教育官员和创新学习教练等多个职位。
{"title":"A research-based conceptual framework for inclusive K-12 online, distance, and digital education","authors":"Mary F. Rice, Kiernan Cantergiani, Danielle Macias","doi":"10.1080/15391523.2023.2264982","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2264982","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractK-12 students who were identified or at risk of being identified as having disabilities had been entering learning environments that were fully or partially online. The increase in participation of this population and the emergency circumstances during COVID-19 pandemic-related school building closures brought a need for research into what supports students in the full range of digital environments. The purpose of this article is to propose a research-based conceptual framework for Inclusive Online, Distance and Digital Education (IODDE) in K-12 settings. IODDE focuses on learners’ biopsychosocial needs alongside two major types of supports: policy supports, and direct learner supports. There are also two types of crucial access: digital access and instructional access. Ensuring learners’ success requires contexts where access and supports are in balance with learner needs.Keywords: Inclusive online educationsupporting students with disabilities onlineonline special educationdigital education for all Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsMary F. RiceMary Rice, PhD in Curriculum & Teaching, has taught children in grades 3-12, but mostly grades 7-9. Mary has developed a research and teaching focus on the design and doing of inclusive online, distance, and digital education and the shared roles and responsibilities that make these experiences educative.Kiernan CantergianiKiernan Cantergiani, MA in Instructional Technology, is a former middle school teacher and current doctoral student. Kiernan’s research focuses on adolescent literacy using digital storytelling.Danielle MaciasDanielle Macias, MA in Learning Design and Technology, has been in education for 10 years Danielle has served in several roles including high school English teacher, adult ESL teacher, state education officer, and Innovative Learning Coach.","PeriodicalId":47444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Technology in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136097697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of blended learning on students’ learning performance: a meta-analysis 混合式学习对学生学习绩效的影响:meta分析
2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2023.2264984
Qing Yu, Kun Yu, Baomin Li, Qiyun Wang
AbstractBlended learning (BL) has become a significant way to promote education reform and development. However, the effectiveness of BL on students’ learning is questioned, and some pedagogy and course design issues also need to be clarified. This meta-analysis investigated the effects of BL while also examining whether eleven moderators would affect BL’s effects. A total of 133 empirical studies consisting of 18,464 participants were identified. The results showed that BL had an upper-medium effect on students’ learning performance (Hedges’ g = 0.651, p < 0.001). Further, moderator analyses showed that the teaching method, proportion of online learning, type of online interaction, region, and publication year had moderating effects. These new findings can improve BL. Finally, the impacts of BL and moderators were discussed, and the implications, limitations, and future directions were provided.Keywords: Blended learningonline learninglearning performancemeta-analysis AcknowledgementsThanks to Dr. Yu Li for her suggestions on this article. We are very grateful to the editors and three reviewers for their useful and constructive comments on our work.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementData will be made available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by grants from the National Education Sciences Planning General Project: Construction and Application Research of Human-Computer Collaborative Diagnostic Model for Classroom Teaching Video Analysis [grant number BHA230123].Notes on contributorsQing YuQing Yu is a PhD student at the Institute of Higher Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. His research interests include AI in education, blended learning, teacher education, technology-enhanced learning, family education, educational management, and student learning and development.Kun YuKun Yu is a graduate student at the School of Social Development and Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. His research interests include computer-assisted learning, online learning, family education, and student learning and development.Baomin LiBaomin Li is a Professor at the Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. Her research interests include intelligent education, teacher education and professional development, classroom teaching research, blended learning, and online education.Qiyun WangQiyun Wang is an Associate Professor at the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. His research interests include blended synchronous learning, online learning, technology-supported learning environment, and education design-based research.
摘要混合式学习已成为推动教育改革与发展的重要途径。然而,BL对学生学习的有效性受到质疑,一些教学法和课程设计问题也需要澄清。本荟萃分析调查了BL的效果,同时也检验了11个调节因子是否会影响BL的效果。共有133项实证研究,涉及18464名参与者。结果显示,BL对学生学习成绩有中上效应(Hedges’g = 0.651, p < 0.001)。此外,调节分析显示,教学方法、在线学习比例、在线互动类型、地区和出版年份具有调节作用。这些新发现有助于改善基础知识。最后,讨论了基础知识和调节因子的影响,并提出了今后的研究方向。关键词:混合式学习在线学习学习绩效meta-分析感谢李宇博士对本文提出的建议。我们非常感谢编辑和三位审稿人对我们的工作提出的有用和建设性的意见。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可用性声明如有合理要求,通讯作者将提供数据。本研究由国家教育科学规划总体项目:课堂教学视频分析人机协同诊断模型的构建与应用研究[批准号:BHA230123]资助。作者简介:qing Yu,中国上海复旦大学高等教育学院博士生。他的研究兴趣包括教育中的人工智能、混合式学习、教师教育、技术增强学习、家庭教育、教育管理和学生学习与发展。俞坤,中国上海复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院研究生。他的研究兴趣包括计算机辅助学习、在线学习、家庭教育和学生学习与发展。李保民,华东师范大学教育学院教授。她的研究兴趣包括智能教育、教师教育和专业发展、课堂教学研究、混合式学习和在线教育。王启云,新加坡南洋理工大学国立教育研究院副教授。他的研究兴趣包括混合同步学习、在线学习、技术支持的学习环境和基于教育设计的研究。
{"title":"Effectiveness of blended learning on students’ learning performance: a meta-analysis","authors":"Qing Yu, Kun Yu, Baomin Li, Qiyun Wang","doi":"10.1080/15391523.2023.2264984","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2264984","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractBlended learning (BL) has become a significant way to promote education reform and development. However, the effectiveness of BL on students’ learning is questioned, and some pedagogy and course design issues also need to be clarified. This meta-analysis investigated the effects of BL while also examining whether eleven moderators would affect BL’s effects. A total of 133 empirical studies consisting of 18,464 participants were identified. The results showed that BL had an upper-medium effect on students’ learning performance (Hedges’ g = 0.651, p < 0.001). Further, moderator analyses showed that the teaching method, proportion of online learning, type of online interaction, region, and publication year had moderating effects. These new findings can improve BL. Finally, the impacts of BL and moderators were discussed, and the implications, limitations, and future directions were provided.Keywords: Blended learningonline learninglearning performancemeta-analysis AcknowledgementsThanks to Dr. Yu Li for her suggestions on this article. We are very grateful to the editors and three reviewers for their useful and constructive comments on our work.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementData will be made available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by grants from the National Education Sciences Planning General Project: Construction and Application Research of Human-Computer Collaborative Diagnostic Model for Classroom Teaching Video Analysis [grant number BHA230123].Notes on contributorsQing YuQing Yu is a PhD student at the Institute of Higher Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. His research interests include AI in education, blended learning, teacher education, technology-enhanced learning, family education, educational management, and student learning and development.Kun YuKun Yu is a graduate student at the School of Social Development and Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. His research interests include computer-assisted learning, online learning, family education, and student learning and development.Baomin LiBaomin Li is a Professor at the Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. Her research interests include intelligent education, teacher education and professional development, classroom teaching research, blended learning, and online education.Qiyun WangQiyun Wang is an Associate Professor at the National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. His research interests include blended synchronous learning, online learning, technology-supported learning environment, and education design-based research.","PeriodicalId":47444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Technology in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136097519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Insights on information literacy from social studies classrooms in the southeast 东南地区社会学科课堂对信息素养的洞察
2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2023.2264965
Daniela DiGiacomo, Carly Muetterties, Caitlin Taylor
AbstractLiving and learning in the United States in 2023 is different than it was decades ago. The proliferation of mis/disinformation vis-a-vis digital means is causing “truth decay,” with an increase in disagreement amongst citizens about what is opinion and fact. Such disagreements constrain opportunities for healthy democratic dialogue. To repair and rebuild dialogue, citizens need information literacy. This article draws upon qualitative data from four social studies eleventh grade classrooms, including teacher and student interviews and focus groups, to better understand the contemporary landscape of teaching and learning information literacy in today’s digital age. Analysis of findings speak to five interrelated insights from practice within the information literacy teaching and learning landscape of one high school context in the southeast of the United States.Keywords: Information literacyK-12 social studiesinstructional practicecivic educationresearch-practice partnerships Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsDaniela DiGiacomoDaniela Kruel DiGiacomo, PhD, is an Assistant Professor at the University of Kentucky in the School of Information Science. With a background in teaching and social work, DiGiacomo’s program of research currently focuses on how to design formal and informal learning settings in ways that support and extend young people’s lived experiences, interests, and expertise.Carly MuettertiesCarly Muetterties, PhD, is the co-founder of CommonGoodEd.com. A former high school social studies teacher and Managing Editor for C3Teachers, Carly collaborates with teachers, schools/districts, and educational organizations in designing inquiry learning experiences to create a culture of inquiry in their classrooms.Caitlin TaylorCaitlin Taylor, MSLS, is a recent graduate of the Library Science program from University of Kentucky’s School of Information Science. Her research interests center on information literacy instruction, particularly at the higher education level.
摘要2023年美国的生活和学习与几十年前不同。与数字手段相对的错误/虚假信息的扩散正在导致“真相衰退”,公民对什么是观点和事实的分歧越来越大。这种分歧限制了健康民主对话的机会。为了修复和重建对话,公民需要信息素养。本文利用来自四所十一年级社会研究教室的定性数据,包括教师和学生访谈和焦点小组,以更好地了解当今数字时代教学和学习信息素养的当代景观。对调查结果的分析从美国东南部一所高中的信息素养教学和学习环境的实践中得出了五个相互关联的见解。关键词:信息素养k -12社会学教学实践教育研究实践伙伴关系披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。作者简介daniela DiGiacomo daniela Kruel DiGiacomo博士是肯塔基大学信息科学学院的助理教授。凭借教学和社会工作的背景,DiGiacomo的研究项目目前专注于如何设计正式和非正式的学习环境,以支持和扩展年轻人的生活经验、兴趣和专业知识。Carly Muetterties博士是CommonGoodEd.com的联合创始人。作为一名前高中社会研究教师和C3Teachers的执行编辑,卡莉与教师、学校/地区和教育机构合作,设计探究学习体验,在他们的课堂上创造一种探究文化。凯特琳·泰勒,MSLS,是肯塔基大学信息科学学院图书馆学专业的应届毕业生。她的研究兴趣集中在信息素养教学,特别是在高等教育水平。
{"title":"Insights on information literacy from social studies classrooms in the southeast","authors":"Daniela DiGiacomo, Carly Muetterties, Caitlin Taylor","doi":"10.1080/15391523.2023.2264965","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2264965","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractLiving and learning in the United States in 2023 is different than it was decades ago. The proliferation of mis/disinformation vis-a-vis digital means is causing “truth decay,” with an increase in disagreement amongst citizens about what is opinion and fact. Such disagreements constrain opportunities for healthy democratic dialogue. To repair and rebuild dialogue, citizens need information literacy. This article draws upon qualitative data from four social studies eleventh grade classrooms, including teacher and student interviews and focus groups, to better understand the contemporary landscape of teaching and learning information literacy in today’s digital age. Analysis of findings speak to five interrelated insights from practice within the information literacy teaching and learning landscape of one high school context in the southeast of the United States.Keywords: Information literacyK-12 social studiesinstructional practicecivic educationresearch-practice partnerships Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsDaniela DiGiacomoDaniela Kruel DiGiacomo, PhD, is an Assistant Professor at the University of Kentucky in the School of Information Science. With a background in teaching and social work, DiGiacomo’s program of research currently focuses on how to design formal and informal learning settings in ways that support and extend young people’s lived experiences, interests, and expertise.Carly MuettertiesCarly Muetterties, PhD, is the co-founder of CommonGoodEd.com. A former high school social studies teacher and Managing Editor for C3Teachers, Carly collaborates with teachers, schools/districts, and educational organizations in designing inquiry learning experiences to create a culture of inquiry in their classrooms.Caitlin TaylorCaitlin Taylor, MSLS, is a recent graduate of the Library Science program from University of Kentucky’s School of Information Science. Her research interests center on information literacy instruction, particularly at the higher education level.","PeriodicalId":47444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Technology in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135094089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Psychosocial processes and human desire: an inconvenient truth about online misinformation 社会心理过程和人类欲望:关于网络错误信息的一个难以忽视的真相
2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2023.2264962
Wayne Journell
AbstractMuch has been written about the potential civic ramifications of online misinformation, and scholars have identified many useful strategies for helping students discern fact from fiction on social media. However, those strategies make an assumption, which is that consumers of digital media have a desire to identify and share accurate information. In this article, I argue that media literacy efforts should also require students to be retrospective and grapple with their own motivations and biases that may make them more susceptible to believing inaccurate or misleading information. Drawing on theories from political psychology, namely motivated reasoning and confirmation bias, as well as psychosocial research that explains the role of affect on individuals’ decision-making, I identify implications for K-12 media literacy education.Keywords: Media literacysocial mediamotivated reasoningconfirmation biasaffectpsychosocial Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 For the K-12 schools, SHEG studied students from 16 districts in 14 states. They prioritized districts with racial and ethnic diversity, and the districts varied in terms of enrollment, percentage of students receiving specialized education services, and proportion of schools receiving Title 1 funds (Breakstone et al., Citation2021).2 Another problem with educating students on social media norms is that they are always changing. For example, the blue check mark no longer has the same authority it once did. After taking control of X, Musk allowed anyone to purchase a blue check mark for a monthly fee, and recent reports indicate that the Meta products (Facebook and Instagram) are going to follow suit (Espada, Citation2023).3 Elon Musk has since changed the name of the app from Twitter to X. However, given that this fake post occurred when the name was still Twitter, I am using that name and referring to the post as a tweet.4 The experiment was part of the Youth Participatory Politics Survey, which is a nationally representative survey of Americans aged 15 to 27.5 I used the search feature of the websites for British Journal of Educational Technology, Computers and Education, Educational Technology and Society, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Journal of Media Literacy, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, and TechTrends.6 As an example, I document one of my own bouts with directional motivation/confirmation bias elsewhere (Journell, Citation2021).7 Determining what is considered an “active user” of social media is somewhat subjective; however, the Pew Research Center (Citation2021) has found that 70% of Facebook users and 60% of Instagram and Snapchat users check their accounts daily. Yet, the number of people who produce content is lower; for example, Pew also found that 25% of the most active X users produced 97% of all posts (McClain, 2021).8 Social media outlets use different terminologies, and some, namely Faceboo
关于网络错误信息的潜在公民后果已经写了很多,学者们已经确定了许多有用的策略来帮助学生在社交媒体上辨别事实和虚构。然而,这些策略都有一个假设,即数字媒体的消费者有识别和分享准确信息的愿望。在这篇文章中,我认为媒体素养的努力也应该要求学生回顾并与自己的动机和偏见作斗争,这可能使他们更容易相信不准确或误导性的信息。根据政治心理学的理论,即动机推理和确认偏差,以及解释影响对个人决策作用的社会心理研究,我确定了对K-12媒体素养教育的影响。关键词:媒体素养社会媒体动机推理确认偏见影响心理社会披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突注1:对于K-12学校,SHEG研究了来自14个州16个学区的学生。他们优先考虑具有种族和民族多样性的地区,这些地区在入学率、接受特殊教育服务的学生比例和接受第一标题基金的学校比例方面各不相同(Breakstone等人,Citation2021)对学生进行社交媒体规范教育的另一个问题是,这些规范总是在变化。例如,蓝色复选标记不再具有与以前相同的权限。在控制了X之后,马斯克允许任何人每月支付一定的费用购买一个蓝色的复选标记,最近的报道表明,Meta产品(Facebook和Instagram)也将效仿(Espada, Citation2023)埃隆·马斯克后来把这个应用程序的名字从Twitter改成了x。然而,考虑到这个假帖子是在Twitter的名字还是Twitter的时候发布的,所以我使用了这个名字,并把它称为一条推文该实验是青年参与政治调查的一部分,该调查是对15至27.5岁的美国人进行的具有全国代表性的调查。我使用了英国教育技术杂志、计算机与教育、教育技术与社会、计算机辅助学习杂志、媒体素养杂志、教育技术研究杂志和技术趋势等网站的搜索功能作为一个例子,我在其他地方记录了我自己与定向动机/确认偏见的一次冲突(Journell, Citation2021)确定什么是社交媒体的“活跃用户”有点主观;然而,皮尤研究中心(Citation2021)发现,70%的Facebook用户和60%的Instagram和Snapchat用户每天都会查看自己的账户。然而,制作内容的人数较少;例如,皮尤研究中心还发现,25%最活跃的X用户发表了97%的帖子(麦克莱恩,2021年)社交媒体使用不同的术语,其中一些,如Facebook,可以选择与某人保持朋友关系,但可以取消关注或阻止他们的帖子被看到。为了便于阅读,我从这里开始使用“取消关注”一词来描述取消与用户的好友关系,屏蔽或隐藏帖子,或任何其他旨在防止人们在他们的社交媒体账户上看到不想要的内容的行为有趣的是,由于政治原因而取消关注的人在美国似乎比在其他民主国家更普遍。在香港进行的研究中(Zhu et al., Citation2017;Zhu & Skoric, Citation2022)和以色列(John & dvr - gvirsman, Citation2015)在这些国家的政治冲突期间,由于政治原因而取消关注的人的比例仅在11%到15%之间。研究表明,美国人死于与难民有关的恐怖袭击的可能性约为36亿分之一(Beauchamp, Citation2017)当然,即使一个人发现一个模因是错误的或令人厌恶的,他们仍然可能会分享它,尽管是为了强调它的不准确性,但这仍然会导致模因被分享。作者简介:wayne Journell是北卡罗来纳大学格林斯博罗分校的社会研究教育教授。他的研究重点是K-12教育中的政治教学和有争议的问题。
{"title":"Psychosocial processes and human desire: an inconvenient truth about online misinformation","authors":"Wayne Journell","doi":"10.1080/15391523.2023.2264962","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2264962","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractMuch has been written about the potential civic ramifications of online misinformation, and scholars have identified many useful strategies for helping students discern fact from fiction on social media. However, those strategies make an assumption, which is that consumers of digital media have a desire to identify and share accurate information. In this article, I argue that media literacy efforts should also require students to be retrospective and grapple with their own motivations and biases that may make them more susceptible to believing inaccurate or misleading information. Drawing on theories from political psychology, namely motivated reasoning and confirmation bias, as well as psychosocial research that explains the role of affect on individuals’ decision-making, I identify implications for K-12 media literacy education.Keywords: Media literacysocial mediamotivated reasoningconfirmation biasaffectpsychosocial Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 For the K-12 schools, SHEG studied students from 16 districts in 14 states. They prioritized districts with racial and ethnic diversity, and the districts varied in terms of enrollment, percentage of students receiving specialized education services, and proportion of schools receiving Title 1 funds (Breakstone et al., Citation2021).2 Another problem with educating students on social media norms is that they are always changing. For example, the blue check mark no longer has the same authority it once did. After taking control of X, Musk allowed anyone to purchase a blue check mark for a monthly fee, and recent reports indicate that the Meta products (Facebook and Instagram) are going to follow suit (Espada, Citation2023).3 Elon Musk has since changed the name of the app from Twitter to X. However, given that this fake post occurred when the name was still Twitter, I am using that name and referring to the post as a tweet.4 The experiment was part of the Youth Participatory Politics Survey, which is a nationally representative survey of Americans aged 15 to 27.5 I used the search feature of the websites for British Journal of Educational Technology, Computers and Education, Educational Technology and Society, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Journal of Media Literacy, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, and TechTrends.6 As an example, I document one of my own bouts with directional motivation/confirmation bias elsewhere (Journell, Citation2021).7 Determining what is considered an “active user” of social media is somewhat subjective; however, the Pew Research Center (Citation2021) has found that 70% of Facebook users and 60% of Instagram and Snapchat users check their accounts daily. Yet, the number of people who produce content is lower; for example, Pew also found that 25% of the most active X users produced 97% of all posts (McClain, 2021).8 Social media outlets use different terminologies, and some, namely Faceboo","PeriodicalId":47444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Technology in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135141950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A rainbow Hurricane?: Exploring student evaluations of ambiguously credible tweeted information within crisis contexts 彩虹飓风?:探讨学生在危机背景下对模糊可信的推特信息的评价
2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-10-06 DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2023.2264980
Gillian E. Mertens
AbstractDuring crisis contexts, information is both critical for user’s decision making and simultaneously challenging to evaluate. When online information’s credibility is ambiguous, young learners are challenged to evaluate rapidly evolving online information. This study sought to explore how 8th-grade students evaluated an ambiguously credible Tweet involving an extraordinary image of Hurricane Dorian. Students rated their skepticism about the image, provided a warrant for their rating, and hypothesized a purpose behind the original poster’s tweet. Students demonstrated three approaches to evaluating the tweet: focusing on information content over source, assuming internet-specific authorial purposes, and applying in-school literacies. This study highlights that educators can use ambiguously credible texts to support students in evaluating online information by supporting student equivocation between contradictory content and source credibility.Keywords: Information literacyinformation credibilityambiguously credible informationsocial media Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsGillian E. MertensGillian Mertens is an Assistant Professor of Literacy Education at SUNY Cortland. Her research interests include digital and information literacies, Internet architecture, and the interplay between technology and identity.
摘要在危机环境中,信息对用户决策至关重要,同时对评估也具有挑战性。当网络信息的可信度模糊不清时,年轻学习者面临着评估快速发展的网络信息的挑战。这项研究试图探索八年级学生如何评估一条模糊可信的推文,其中涉及飓风多里安的非凡图像。学生们对他们对图片的怀疑程度进行了评分,为他们的评分提供了依据,并假设原始发帖者的推文背后有一个目的。学生们展示了评估推文的三种方法:关注信息内容而不是来源,假设互联网特定的作者目的,以及应用学校的素养。本研究强调,教育工作者可以通过支持学生在矛盾内容和来源可信度之间的模棱两可来使用模糊可信的文本来支持学生评估在线信息。关键词:信息素养信息可信度模糊可信信息社交媒体披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。作者简介:吉莉安·e·默滕斯吉莉安·默滕斯是纽约州立大学科特兰分校的扫盲教育助理教授。她的研究兴趣包括数字和信息素养、互联网架构以及技术与身份之间的相互作用。
{"title":"A rainbow Hurricane?: Exploring student evaluations of ambiguously credible tweeted information within crisis contexts","authors":"Gillian E. Mertens","doi":"10.1080/15391523.2023.2264980","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2264980","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractDuring crisis contexts, information is both critical for user’s decision making and simultaneously challenging to evaluate. When online information’s credibility is ambiguous, young learners are challenged to evaluate rapidly evolving online information. This study sought to explore how 8th-grade students evaluated an ambiguously credible Tweet involving an extraordinary image of Hurricane Dorian. Students rated their skepticism about the image, provided a warrant for their rating, and hypothesized a purpose behind the original poster’s tweet. Students demonstrated three approaches to evaluating the tweet: focusing on information content over source, assuming internet-specific authorial purposes, and applying in-school literacies. This study highlights that educators can use ambiguously credible texts to support students in evaluating online information by supporting student equivocation between contradictory content and source credibility.Keywords: Information literacyinformation credibilityambiguously credible informationsocial media Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsGillian E. MertensGillian Mertens is an Assistant Professor of Literacy Education at SUNY Cortland. Her research interests include digital and information literacies, Internet architecture, and the interplay between technology and identity.","PeriodicalId":47444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Technology in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135346585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emotion, stimulation, habit, and criticality: Learning from teachers’ multifaceted conceptions of digital reading 情感、刺激、习惯与批判性:从教师数字化阅读的多层面概念中学习
2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-10-06 DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2023.2264979
Brady L. Nash
AbstractThe emergence of post-truth culture and the spread of dis/misinformation has received a great deal of attention from researchers. Existing approaches to digital information literacy highlight new skills and strategies needed in digital spaces. However, challenges remain, including disconnects between school curricula and out-of-school experiences, a lack of research on teachers’ conceptions, and the role of emotional and sociocultural factors in meaning-making. Addressing these concerns, this qualitative case study examines how five teachers conceptualized and operationalized digital literacy through curriculum. The findings emphasize the importance of critical, sociocultural, emotional, and affective factors in conceptualizing and teaching digital literacy.Keywords: Digital literacyonline readingaffectcritical literacystimulationcurriculum developmentmeaning-makingliteracy studies Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsBrady L. NashBrady L. Nash is an Assistant Professor of English Language Arts in the Department of Teaching, Curriculum, and Educational Inquiry and Affiliate Faculty in the Department of English. His research focuses on critical approaches to digital literacies and new technologies in the context of humanities education and the ways in which people come to understand the world through engagements with digital media.
摘要后真相文化的出现和虚假信息的传播受到了研究者的广泛关注。现有的数字信息素养方法强调了数字空间所需的新技能和战略。然而,挑战仍然存在,包括学校课程与校外经验之间的脱节,缺乏对教师概念的研究,以及情感和社会文化因素在意义形成中的作用。为了解决这些问题,本定性案例研究考察了五位教师如何通过课程概念化和操作化数字素养。研究结果强调了关键、社会文化、情感和情感因素在概念化和数字素养教学中的重要性。关键词:数字读写能力;在线阅读影响;批判性读写能力;布雷迪·纳什布雷迪·纳什是教学、课程和教育探究系的英语语言艺术助理教授,也是英语系的附属教员。他的研究主要集中在人文教育背景下的数字素养和新技术的关键方法,以及人们通过与数字媒体的接触来理解世界的方式。
{"title":"Emotion, stimulation, habit, and criticality: Learning from teachers’ multifaceted conceptions of digital reading","authors":"Brady L. Nash","doi":"10.1080/15391523.2023.2264979","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2264979","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe emergence of post-truth culture and the spread of dis/misinformation has received a great deal of attention from researchers. Existing approaches to digital information literacy highlight new skills and strategies needed in digital spaces. However, challenges remain, including disconnects between school curricula and out-of-school experiences, a lack of research on teachers’ conceptions, and the role of emotional and sociocultural factors in meaning-making. Addressing these concerns, this qualitative case study examines how five teachers conceptualized and operationalized digital literacy through curriculum. The findings emphasize the importance of critical, sociocultural, emotional, and affective factors in conceptualizing and teaching digital literacy.Keywords: Digital literacyonline readingaffectcritical literacystimulationcurriculum developmentmeaning-makingliteracy studies Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsBrady L. NashBrady L. Nash is an Assistant Professor of English Language Arts in the Department of Teaching, Curriculum, and Educational Inquiry and Affiliate Faculty in the Department of English. His research focuses on critical approaches to digital literacies and new technologies in the context of humanities education and the ways in which people come to understand the world through engagements with digital media.","PeriodicalId":47444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Technology in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135347696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effect of chatbots on learning: a meta-analysis of empirical research 聊天机器人对学习的影响:实证研究的元分析
2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2023.2255698
Ecenaz Alemdag
This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively review empirical studies on the effect of chatbots on learning and quantitatively synthesize their findings to produce an overall effect size. Searching several databases yielded 28 eligible reports with 31 individual effect sizes. The results revealed a significant and medium effect (g = .48) of chatbots on learning. Further analyses indicated four significant moderators: the type of instruction in the comparison group, experimental duration, chatbot type, and chatbot tasks. The highest effect sizes emerged when the comparison group had no specific support, the experiment lasted only one session, and chatbots were task-focused and took care of frequently asked questions. These results suggest that chatbots can be more effective in certain cases within their overall contribution area to learning.
本荟萃分析旨在全面回顾关于聊天机器人对学习影响的实证研究,并定量综合研究结果,得出总体效应大小。在多个数据库中搜索得到了28个符合条件的报告,其中包含31个个体效应量。结果显示聊天机器人对学习有显著的中等影响(g = .48)。进一步的分析表明,有四个重要的调节因素:对照组的教学类型、实验时间、聊天机器人类型和聊天机器人任务。当对照组没有特定支持、实验只持续一次、聊天机器人以任务为中心并处理常见问题时,效应值最高。这些结果表明,在某些情况下,聊天机器人在它们对学习的整体贡献范围内可以更有效。
{"title":"The effect of chatbots on learning: a meta-analysis of empirical research","authors":"Ecenaz Alemdag","doi":"10.1080/15391523.2023.2255698","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2255698","url":null,"abstract":"This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively review empirical studies on the effect of chatbots on learning and quantitatively synthesize their findings to produce an overall effect size. Searching several databases yielded 28 eligible reports with 31 individual effect sizes. The results revealed a significant and medium effect (g = .48) of chatbots on learning. Further analyses indicated four significant moderators: the type of instruction in the comparison group, experimental duration, chatbot type, and chatbot tasks. The highest effect sizes emerged when the comparison group had no specific support, the experiment lasted only one session, and chatbots were task-focused and took care of frequently asked questions. These results suggest that chatbots can be more effective in certain cases within their overall contribution area to learning.","PeriodicalId":47444,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Technology in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135826894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Journal of Research on Technology in Education
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1