首页 > 最新文献

European Journal of Education最新文献

英文 中文
Correction to ‘Educational Resource Allocation and Management of Life Adaptation Curricula: Addressing Regional Inequalities in Special Needs Education’ 对“生活适应课程的教育资源配置与管理:解决特殊需要教育的地区不平等”的修正
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70463

Qijiao Qian, Yiqian Chen, Khalaf Alfadeed, Wejdan Deebani. Educational Resource Allocation and Management of Life Adaptation Curricula: Addressing Regional Inequalities in Special Needs Education. European Journal of Education, 61(1), e70410. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70410

The third author's name was published as: Khalaf Alshammari

It should have been: Khalaf Alfadeed

The name has been corrected in the article. We apologise for this error.

钱启姣,陈一茜,Khalaf Alfadeed, Wejdan Deebani。生活适应课程的教育资源分配与管理:解决特殊需要教育的地区不平等问题。教育科学学报,21(1),344 - 344。https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70410The第三作者的名字被发表为:Khalaf alshammarii,它应该是:Khalaf alfaded文章中的名字已被更正。我们为这个错误道歉。
{"title":"Correction to ‘Educational Resource Allocation and Management of Life Adaptation Curricula: Addressing Regional Inequalities in Special Needs Education’","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70463","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70463","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Qijiao Qian, Yiqian Chen, Khalaf Alfadeed, Wejdan Deebani. Educational Resource Allocation and Management of Life Adaptation Curricula: Addressing Regional Inequalities in Special Needs Education. <i>European Journal of Education</i>, 61(1), e70410. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70410</p><p>The third author's name was published as: Khalaf <b>Alshammari</b></p><p>It should have been: Khalaf <b>Alfadeed</b></p><p>The name has been corrected in the article. We apologise for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.70463","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Constructing and Validating the AIPACK Scale: Measuring Teachers' AI Pedagogical Content Knowledge AIPACK量表的构建与验证:教师人工智能教学内容知识的测量
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70464
Bor-Chen Kuo, Pei-Chen Wu, Ya-Ching Fan, Chen-Huei Liao

This study developed and validated the Artificial Intelligence Pedagogical Content Knowledge (AIPACK) scale to assess the AI-related instructional knowledge of primary and secondary school teachers in Taiwan. The scale includes four dimensions: AI Knowledge (AIK), AI Content Knowledge (AICK), AI Pedagogical Knowledge (AIPK), and AI Pedagogical Content Knowledge (AIPACK). Valid responses from 200 participants were analysed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), resulting in a finalised 26-item scale with a four-factor structure. The CFA results indicated good model fit. All factor loadings exceeded 0.60, and both the average variance extracted (AVE) and composite reliability (CR) met the recommended thresholds, indicating strong construct validity and internal consistency. Measurement invariance was established across gender and teaching roles (preservice vs. in-service), enabling valid cross-group comparisons. The findings support the AIPACK scale's reliability and validity as a tool for evaluating teachers' AI-related instructional knowledge and offer a foundation for future research, training, and policy.

本研究开发并验证人工智能教学内容知识量表(AIPACK),以评估台湾地区中小学教师的人工智能相关教学知识。该量表包括四个维度:AI知识(AIK)、AI内容知识(aiick)、AI教学知识(AIPK)和AI教学内容知识(AIPACK)。使用验证性因子分析(CFA)对200名参与者的有效回答进行了分析,最终得出了具有四因素结构的26项量表。CFA结果表明模型拟合良好。所有因子载荷均超过0.60,平均方差提取(AVE)和复合信度(CR)均达到推荐阈值,表明结构效度和内部一致性较强。在性别和教学角色(职前与在职)之间建立了测量不变性,从而实现了有效的跨组比较。研究结果支持AIPACK量表作为评估教师人工智能相关教学知识的工具的信度和效度,并为未来的研究、培训和政策提供基础。
{"title":"Constructing and Validating the AIPACK Scale: Measuring Teachers' AI Pedagogical Content Knowledge","authors":"Bor-Chen Kuo,&nbsp;Pei-Chen Wu,&nbsp;Ya-Ching Fan,&nbsp;Chen-Huei Liao","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70464","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70464","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study developed and validated the Artificial Intelligence Pedagogical Content Knowledge (AIPACK) scale to assess the AI-related instructional knowledge of primary and secondary school teachers in Taiwan. The scale includes four dimensions: AI Knowledge (AIK), AI Content Knowledge (AICK), AI Pedagogical Knowledge (AIPK), and AI Pedagogical Content Knowledge (AIPACK). Valid responses from 200 participants were analysed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), resulting in a finalised 26-item scale with a four-factor structure. The CFA results indicated good model fit. All factor loadings exceeded 0.60, and both the average variance extracted (AVE) and composite reliability (CR) met the recommended thresholds, indicating strong construct validity and internal consistency. Measurement invariance was established across gender and teaching roles (preservice vs. in-service), enabling valid cross-group comparisons. The findings support the AIPACK scale's reliability and validity as a tool for evaluating teachers' AI-related instructional knowledge and offer a foundation for future research, training, and policy.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146057877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advancing Early Childhood Music Education: A Three-Decade Review of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Instructional Developments 推进幼儿音乐教育:认知、语言和教学发展的三十年回顾
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70467
Qiang Li, Yi-Li Chang

Early Childhood Music Education (ECME) has been recognised for its significant contributions not only to the development of musical abilities and creative thinking, but also to children's academic achievement, socio-emotional competence, and language acquisition. However, systematic reviews focusing specifically on music education within early childhood contexts remain scarce. To address this gap, this study conducted a bibliometric analysis of 643 publications using CiteSpace and VOSviewer. The analysis identified key contributors (e.g., Ilari, Beatriz; Trainor, Laurel J.; Bautista, Alfredo), high-output countries (e.g., the United States, China, Canada), leading institutions (e.g., McMaster University, University of Toronto, University of Southern California, and The Education University of Hong Kong), and core journals (e.g., Music Education Research, International Journal of Music Education, Journal of Research in Music Education). Four major thematic directions were extracted: perception of musical elements and neural plasticity, ECME curriculum development and teacher professionalism, music training and its effects on cognitive and language development, and children's behaviour and mental health. Additionally, burst term analysis revealed two emerging research frontiers: the impact of ECME on children's self-regulation and the integration of digital technologies to enhance teacher development. These findings offer a comprehensive overview of the field and provide valuable insights for future research and practice in ECME.

幼儿音乐教育(ECME)不仅对音乐能力和创造性思维的发展做出了重要贡献,而且对儿童的学业成就、社会情感能力和语言习得也有重要贡献。然而,专门关注儿童早期音乐教育的系统评论仍然很少。为了解决这一差距,本研究使用CiteSpace和VOSviewer对643篇出版物进行了文献计量学分析。该分析确定了主要贡献者(如Ilari, Beatriz, Trainor, Laurel J., Bautista, Alfredo),高产出国家(如美国,中国,加拿大),领先机构(如麦克马斯特大学,多伦多大学,南加州大学和香港教育大学)和核心期刊(如音乐教育研究,国际音乐教育杂志,音乐教育研究杂志)。提取了四个主要的主题方向:音乐元素感知与神经可塑性、ECME课程开发与教师专业化、音乐训练及其对认知和语言发展的影响、儿童行为和心理健康。此外,burst term分析揭示了两个新兴的研究前沿:ECME对儿童自我调节的影响和数字技术的整合促进教师发展。这些发现提供了该领域的全面概述,并为ECME的未来研究和实践提供了有价值的见解。
{"title":"Advancing Early Childhood Music Education: A Three-Decade Review of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Instructional Developments","authors":"Qiang Li,&nbsp;Yi-Li Chang","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70467","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70467","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Early Childhood Music Education (ECME) has been recognised for its significant contributions not only to the development of musical abilities and creative thinking, but also to children's academic achievement, socio-emotional competence, and language acquisition. However, systematic reviews focusing specifically on music education within early childhood contexts remain scarce. To address this gap, this study conducted a bibliometric analysis of 643 publications using CiteSpace and VOSviewer. The analysis identified key contributors (e.g., Ilari, Beatriz; Trainor, Laurel J.; Bautista, Alfredo), high-output countries (e.g., the United States, China, Canada), leading institutions (e.g., McMaster University, University of Toronto, University of Southern California, and The Education University of Hong Kong), and core journals (e.g., Music Education Research, International Journal of Music Education, Journal of Research in Music Education). Four major thematic directions were extracted: perception of musical elements and neural plasticity, ECME curriculum development and teacher professionalism, music training and its effects on cognitive and language development, and children's behaviour and mental health. Additionally, burst term analysis revealed two emerging research frontiers: the impact of ECME on children's self-regulation and the integration of digital technologies to enhance teacher development. These findings offer a comprehensive overview of the field and provide valuable insights for future research and practice in ECME.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146099450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigating the Educational Impact of Robotics Classrooms on Problem-Solving Skills and Cognitive Development Among Higher Education Students 研究机器人课堂对高等教育学生解决问题能力和认知发展的教育影响
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70459
Xinyu Liu, Yunhua Deng

Despite growing interest in robotics-based education, limited research has examined how such learning environments influence both cognitive development and problem-solving skills in tertiary education, particularly regarding their interactive effects on student engagement. Addressing this gap, the present study investigates the impact of robotics classrooms on 508 college students' cognitive development, problem-solving abilities, and engagement with robotics activities. Data were collected through Wenjuanxing, an online platform, using a structured questionnaire comprising four sections: demographic information, the Cognitive Development Scale (CDS), the Problem-Solving Inventory (PSI), and the Robotics Engagement and Attitudes Questionnaire (REAQ). After data cleaning, analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 27) for descriptive statistics, correlations, and regression, and AMOS (version 24) for structural equation modelling (SEM). Results indicated a significant positive correlation among cognitive development, problem-solving skills, and robotics engagement (r = 0.52–0.68, p < 0.001). Cognitive development emerged as a moderate to strong predictor of robotics engagement (β = 0.47, p < 0.001), while problem-solving skills also served as a strong predictor (β = 0.51, p < 0.001). Together, these variables explained a substantial proportion of variance in robotics engagement (adjusted R2 = 0.56). SEM analyses further revealed that problem-solving skills partially mediated the relationship between cognitive development and robotics engagement (indirect effect = 0.24, p < 0.001). These findings highlight the value of robotics-based education, providing practical guidance for instructors and curriculum designers to create learning experiences that foster higher-order thinking and strategic problem-solving, thereby enhancing technology-enhanced educational outcomes in higher education.

尽管人们对基于机器人的教育越来越感兴趣,但很少有研究调查这种学习环境如何影响高等教育中的认知发展和解决问题的能力,特别是它们对学生参与度的互动影响。为了弥补这一差距,本研究调查了机器人课堂对508名大学生认知发展、解决问题能力和参与机器人活动的影响。数据通过在线平台“问答行”收集,采用结构化问卷,包括四个部分:人口统计信息、认知发展量表(CDS)、问题解决量表(PSI)和机器人参与与态度问卷(REAQ)。数据清洗后,使用SPSS(版本27)进行描述性统计、相关性和回归分析,使用AMOS(版本24)进行结构方程建模(SEM)分析。结果显示认知发展、解决问题能力和机器人参与之间存在显著的正相关(r = 0.52-0.68, p < 0.001)。认知发展是机器人参与的一个中等到强烈的预测因子(β = 0.47, p < 0.001),而解决问题的能力也是一个强烈的预测因子(β = 0.51, p < 0.001)。总之,这些变量解释了机器人参与的很大一部分方差(调整后的R2 = 0.56)。扫描电镜分析进一步表明,解决问题的能力部分介导了认知发展和机器人参与之间的关系(间接效应= 0.24,p < 0.001)。这些发现突出了基于机器人的教育的价值,为教师和课程设计师提供了实践指导,以创造培养高阶思维和战略问题解决的学习体验,从而提高高等教育中技术增强的教育成果。
{"title":"Investigating the Educational Impact of Robotics Classrooms on Problem-Solving Skills and Cognitive Development Among Higher Education Students","authors":"Xinyu Liu,&nbsp;Yunhua Deng","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70459","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70459","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Despite growing interest in robotics-based education, limited research has examined how such learning environments influence both cognitive development and problem-solving skills in tertiary education, particularly regarding their interactive effects on student engagement. Addressing this gap, the present study investigates the impact of robotics classrooms on 508 college students' cognitive development, problem-solving abilities, and engagement with robotics activities. Data were collected through Wenjuanxing, an online platform, using a structured questionnaire comprising four sections: demographic information, the Cognitive Development Scale (CDS), the Problem-Solving Inventory (PSI), and the Robotics Engagement and Attitudes Questionnaire (REAQ). After data cleaning, analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 27) for descriptive statistics, correlations, and regression, and AMOS (version 24) for structural equation modelling (SEM). Results indicated a significant positive correlation among cognitive development, problem-solving skills, and robotics engagement (<i>r</i> = 0.52–0.68, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Cognitive development emerged as a moderate to strong predictor of robotics engagement (β = 0.47, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), while problem-solving skills also served as a strong predictor (β = 0.51, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Together, these variables explained a substantial proportion of variance in robotics engagement (adjusted <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.56). SEM analyses further revealed that problem-solving skills partially mediated the relationship between cognitive development and robotics engagement (indirect effect = 0.24, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). These findings highlight the value of robotics-based education, providing practical guidance for instructors and curriculum designers to create learning experiences that foster higher-order thinking and strategic problem-solving, thereby enhancing technology-enhanced educational outcomes in higher education.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146099222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incorporating Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (AI) Into Teaching Chinese as a Second Language in Higher Education: Unveiling the Potential Challenges and Opportunities 将机器人和人工智能(AI)融入高等教育汉语教学:揭示潜在的挑战和机遇
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-18 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70442
Xuesong Dong, Hong Wang

The use of cutting-edge technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics in language education has recently captured the attention of many scholars across the world. However, the potential and challenges of incorporating such technologies in Chinese as a second language (CSL) at the higher education level have been widely overlooked in the literature. Most of the studies in this area revolve around the English language. To address the gaps, this study adopted a qualitative study through a semi-structured interview, held in English, with a sample of 42 higher education Chinese teachers teaching CSL. The results of thematic analysis demonstrated that incorporating AI and robotics in CSL classes had been beneficial for ‘reducing teachers’ workload and burden’, ‘diversifying teaching resources and materials’, ‘personalizing and aligning teaching to students' needs and interests’ and ‘increasing teachers’ teaching efficacy’. Moreover, it was found that using these technologies produces some challenges for CSL teachers because they need ‘teacher training’ and ‘financial support and infrastructures' and reduces CSL students’ ‘creativity and critical thinking’ and ‘interpersonal communication and interaction’. The findings are discussed and implications at the theoretical and practical levels are presented to increase CSL teachers’ knowledge and skills pertaining to AI and robot-mediated language education in light of educational technology frameworks. Moreover, actionable recommendations for CSL professional development, policy enactment and resource allocation in technology-enhanced classrooms are provided.

最近,人工智能(AI)和机器人技术等尖端技术在语言教育中的应用引起了世界各地许多学者的关注。然而,将这些技术纳入高等教育的潜力和挑战在文献中被广泛忽视。这一领域的大部分研究都围绕着英语语言展开。为了解决这一差距,本研究采用了一种定性研究,通过半结构化访谈,用英语进行,样本为42名高等教育汉语教师。专题分析结果表明,人工智能和机器人技术在汉语课堂教学中具有“减轻教师的工作量和负担”、“丰富教学资源和教材”、“个性化教学,使教学符合学生的需求和兴趣”、“提高教师的教学效能”等优点。此外,我们还发现这些技术的使用给对外汉语教师带来了一些挑战,因为他们需要“教师培训”和“资金支持和基础设施”,并且降低了对外汉语学生的“创造力和批判性思维”以及“人际沟通和互动”。本文对研究结果进行了讨论,并提出了理论和实践层面的启示,以提高汉语教学教师在教育技术框架下与人工智能和机器人介导的语言教育相关的知识和技能。此外,本研究亦就科技教室的专业发展、政策制定及资源分配提供可行的建议。
{"title":"Incorporating Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (AI) Into Teaching Chinese as a Second Language in Higher Education: Unveiling the Potential Challenges and Opportunities","authors":"Xuesong Dong,&nbsp;Hong Wang","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70442","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The use of cutting-edge technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics in language education has recently captured the attention of many scholars across the world. However, the potential and challenges of incorporating such technologies in Chinese as a second language (CSL) at the higher education level have been widely overlooked in the literature. Most of the studies in this area revolve around the English language. To address the gaps, this study adopted a qualitative study through a semi-structured interview, held in English, with a sample of 42 higher education Chinese teachers teaching CSL. The results of thematic analysis demonstrated that incorporating AI and robotics in CSL classes had been beneficial for ‘reducing teachers’ workload and burden’, ‘diversifying teaching resources and materials’, ‘personalizing and aligning teaching to students' needs and interests’ and ‘increasing teachers’ teaching efficacy’. Moreover, it was found that using these technologies produces some challenges for CSL teachers because they need ‘teacher training’ and ‘financial support and infrastructures' and reduces CSL students’ ‘creativity and critical thinking’ and ‘interpersonal communication and interaction’. The findings are discussed and implications at the theoretical and practical levels are presented to increase CSL teachers’ knowledge and skills pertaining to AI and robot-mediated language education in light of educational technology frameworks. Moreover, actionable recommendations for CSL professional development, policy enactment and resource allocation in technology-enhanced classrooms are provided.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mapping the Global Landscape: A Retrospective and Prospective Scopus-Based Bibliometric Review on Business English Research (2000–2025) 绘制全球格局:基于范围的商务英语研究文献计量学回顾与展望(2000-2025)
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-18 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70469
Ke Hu, Asmaa AlSaqqaf

Business English is the established lingua franca of global commerce and a core academic discipline worldwide. Despite growing research interest in the field, it still lacks a comprehensive analysis of the latest developments from a global perspective, particularly regarding technological shifts and the post-pandemic context. This study aims to bridge this gap by employing bibliometric analysis with VOSviewer to map the knowledge domain and trace the development of business English research through an examination of 381 Scopus-indexed publications (2000–2025), including the various facets of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. Results show a consistent rise in global research output and a thematic evolution from traditional pedagogy to innovative approaches across three stages. The analysis identifies leading countries, authors, organisations, and sources, while text mining reveals current research hotspots. The study provides a comprehensive domain overview, concluding with implications and insights to guide future research and practice in the field.

商务英语是全球商业的通用语言,也是世界范围内的一门核心学科。尽管对该领域的研究兴趣日益浓厚,但它仍然缺乏从全球角度对最新发展的全面分析,特别是关于技术变革和大流行后背景的分析。本研究旨在通过使用VOSviewer的文献计量分析来绘制知识领域,并通过对381份scopus索引出版物(2000-2025)的检查来追踪商务英语研究的发展,包括分析,设计,开发,实施和评估的各个方面,从而弥合这一差距。结果显示,全球研究产出持续上升,从传统教学法到创新方法的主题演变跨越三个阶段。该分析确定了主要国家、作者、组织和来源,而文本挖掘则揭示了当前的研究热点。该研究提供了一个全面的领域概述,并总结了指导该领域未来研究和实践的启示和见解。
{"title":"Mapping the Global Landscape: A Retrospective and Prospective Scopus-Based Bibliometric Review on Business English Research (2000–2025)","authors":"Ke Hu,&nbsp;Asmaa AlSaqqaf","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70469","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70469","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Business English is the established lingua franca of global commerce and a core academic discipline worldwide. Despite growing research interest in the field, it still lacks a comprehensive analysis of the latest developments from a global perspective, particularly regarding technological shifts and the post-pandemic context. This study aims to bridge this gap by employing bibliometric analysis with VOSviewer to map the knowledge domain and trace the development of business English research through an examination of 381 Scopus-indexed publications (2000–2025), including the various facets of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. Results show a consistent rise in global research output and a thematic evolution from traditional pedagogy to innovative approaches across three stages. The analysis identifies leading countries, authors, organisations, and sources, while text mining reveals current research hotspots. The study provides a comprehensive domain overview, concluding with implications and insights to guide future research and practice in the field.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How Technology Integration Beliefs Influence Chinese Teachers' Diversified Assessment Practices: The Chain Mediating Roles of Digital Teaching Self-Efficacy and Technology Integration Practices 技术整合信念对教师多元化评价实践的影响:数字教学自我效能感与技术整合实践的链式中介作用
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70437
Mengting Qian, Chunshun Yan

Against the backdrop of education systems' digital transformation, a central question concerns how teachers' beliefs are translated into innovative classroom practice. Drawing on Value–Belief–Norm (VBN) theory, this study examines whether and how teachers' technology integration beliefs shape diversified student assessment practices through the serial mediating roles of digital teaching self-efficacy and technology integration practices. Using data from 1298 teachers in the Shanghai (China) sample of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2024, we conducted serial mediation analyses using PROCESS Model 6, with bootstrapped confidence intervals. The findings show that: (1) technology integration beliefs significantly and positively predict digital teaching self-efficacy, technology integration practices and diversified student assessment practices; (2) digital teaching self-efficacy and technology integration practices each exert significant independent mediating effects; and (3) they also operate sequentially, revealing a coherent mechanism through which beliefs are converted into professional behaviour. By validating the applicability of VBN theory to educational technology research, this study offers a theoretically grounded account of teachers' assessment innovation and provides implications for policy and practice: strengthening teachers' technology integration beliefs and enhancing digital teaching self-efficacy may be pivotal levers for advancing diversified assessment practices.

在教育系统数字化转型的背景下,一个核心问题是如何将教师的信念转化为创新的课堂实践。本研究运用价值-信念-规范(Value-Belief-Norm, VBN)理论,通过数字化教学自我效能感和技术整合实践的系列中介作用,考察教师的技术整合信念是否以及如何塑造多样化的学生评估实践。利用经济合作与发展组织(OECD) 2024年教学与学习国际调查(TALIS)中1298名中国上海教师样本的数据,我们使用过程模型6进行了序列中介分析,并采用自启动置信区间。研究结果表明:(1)技术整合信念显著正向预测数字化教学自我效能感、技术整合实践和多元化学生评价实践;(2)数字化教学自我效能感与技术整合实践各自具有显著的独立中介效应;(3)它们也按顺序运行,揭示了一种连贯的机制,通过这种机制,信念转化为职业行为。通过验证VBN理论在教育技术研究中的适用性,本研究为教师评估创新提供了理论基础,并为政策和实践提供了启示:加强教师的技术整合信念和提高数字化教学自我效能感可能是推进多样化评估实践的关键杠杆。
{"title":"How Technology Integration Beliefs Influence Chinese Teachers' Diversified Assessment Practices: The Chain Mediating Roles of Digital Teaching Self-Efficacy and Technology Integration Practices","authors":"Mengting Qian,&nbsp;Chunshun Yan","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70437","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70437","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Against the backdrop of education systems' digital transformation, a central question concerns how teachers' beliefs are translated into innovative classroom practice. Drawing on Value–Belief–Norm (VBN) theory, this study examines whether and how teachers' technology integration beliefs shape diversified student assessment practices through the serial mediating roles of digital teaching self-efficacy and technology integration practices. Using data from 1298 teachers in the Shanghai (China) sample of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2024, we conducted serial mediation analyses using PROCESS Model 6, with bootstrapped confidence intervals. The findings show that: (1) technology integration beliefs significantly and positively predict digital teaching self-efficacy, technology integration practices and diversified student assessment practices; (2) digital teaching self-efficacy and technology integration practices each exert significant independent mediating effects; and (3) they also operate sequentially, revealing a coherent mechanism through which beliefs are converted into professional behaviour. By validating the applicability of VBN theory to educational technology research, this study offers a theoretically grounded account of teachers' assessment innovation and provides implications for policy and practice: strengthening teachers' technology integration beliefs and enhancing digital teaching self-efficacy may be pivotal levers for advancing diversified assessment practices.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146002215","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trusting the Machine: How AI Assessment Feedback and AI Literacy Shape Students' Idea Implementation Skills 信任机器:人工智能评估反馈和人工智能素养如何塑造学生的想法实现技能
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70457
Amjad Islam Amjad, Bisma Sajjad Sheikh

Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed higher education. The research shows that university students use AI and acquire academic ideas to develop innovative solutions to their problems. However, there is limited research on how AI feedback helps students improve their idea implementation. This study was rooted in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT). The objective was to examine how the AI assessment feedback (AIAF), trust in AI (TAI) and AI literacy (AIL) influence university students' idea implementation skills (IIS). A descriptive survey design was used to collect data from 486 university students. The analysis revealed that AIAF significantly contributes to students' IIS at the university level. TAI was found to partially mediate the relationship between university students' AIAF and IIS. AIL was found to contribute to students' IIS individually. However, the interaction effect (AIAF*AIL) was not found to be a significant contributor to students' IIS. We found that the interplay among the study's variables (AIAF, TAI and AIL) positively enhances university students' IIS in solving their academic problems. It was recommended that students should use self-regulated learning in AI feedback to improve their achievements. In addition, the current study has several practical, research and policy implications.

人工智能(AI)已经改变了高等教育。研究表明,大学生利用人工智能并获取学术思想,为他们的问题开发创新的解决方案。然而,关于人工智能反馈如何帮助学生提高他们的想法执行能力的研究有限。本研究基于技术接受模型(TAM)和社会认知理论(SCT)。目的是研究人工智能评估反馈(AIAF)、对人工智能的信任(TAI)和人工智能素养(AIL)如何影响大学生的想法实施技能(IIS)。采用描述性调查设计对486名大学生进行数据收集。分析表明,AIAF对大学阶段学生的IIS有显著影响。发现TAI在大学生AIAF与IIS之间具有部分中介作用。研究发现,学生的个人情绪对IIS有影响。然而,交互效应(AIAF*AIL)并未对学生的IIS产生显著影响。我们发现,研究变量(AIAF、TAI和AIL)之间的相互作用正增强了大学生解决学业问题的IIS。建议学生在人工智能反馈中使用自我调节学习来提高他们的成绩。此外,本研究具有若干实际、研究和政策意义。
{"title":"Trusting the Machine: How AI Assessment Feedback and AI Literacy Shape Students' Idea Implementation Skills","authors":"Amjad Islam Amjad,&nbsp;Bisma Sajjad Sheikh","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70457","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70457","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed higher education. The research shows that university students use AI and acquire academic ideas to develop innovative solutions to their problems. However, there is limited research on how AI feedback helps students improve their idea implementation. This study was rooted in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT). The objective was to examine how the AI assessment feedback (AIAF), trust in AI (TAI) and AI literacy (AIL) influence university students' idea implementation skills (IIS). A descriptive survey design was used to collect data from 486 university students. The analysis revealed that AIAF significantly contributes to students' IIS at the university level. TAI was found to partially mediate the relationship between university students' AIAF and IIS. AIL was found to contribute to students' IIS individually. However, the interaction effect (AIAF*AIL) was not found to be a significant contributor to students' IIS. We found that the interplay among the study's variables (AIAF, TAI and AIL) positively enhances university students' IIS in solving their academic problems. It was recommended that students should use self-regulated learning in AI feedback to improve their achievements. In addition, the current study has several practical, research and policy implications.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145996660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and Validation of Learning Behaviour Scale for University Students in Blended Learning: A Technology Acceptance Model Perspective 混合学习大学生学习行为量表的编制与验证:技术接受模型视角
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70406
Huaruo Chen, Zhentao Peng, Hui Ma, Hancai Qiu, Gefan Wang, Feng Liu, Ruihan Liu, Wanru Song

As blended learning becomes a new norm in higher education, students' learning behaviours in this context have drawn great concern. To accurately assess these behaviours, this TAM-based mixed-method study first developed a semi-structured interview protocol via literature review, interviewed 10 university students with blended learning experience to preliminarily construct a 3-dimensional framework (behavioural intention, process, feedback), then 297 students from a university in China who have participated in blended learning are randomly selected as the research objects. Exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and reliability tests showed good model fit and scale reliability/validity, indicating the scale has application value and provides ideas for universities to enhance students' positive learning behaviours in blended learning.

随着混合式学习成为高等教育的新常态,学生在这种背景下的学习行为受到了广泛关注。为了准确评估这些行为,本基于tam的混合方法研究首先通过文献综述制定了半结构化访谈方案,对10名有混合式学习经历的大学生进行了访谈,初步构建了一个三维框架(行为意向、过程、反馈),然后随机选择297名中国某高校参与混合式学习的学生作为研究对象。探索性因子分析、验证性因子分析和信度检验均显示模型拟合良好,量表信效度较好,说明该量表具有应用价值,为高校在混合学习中增强学生的积极学习行为提供了思路。
{"title":"Development and Validation of Learning Behaviour Scale for University Students in Blended Learning: A Technology Acceptance Model Perspective","authors":"Huaruo Chen,&nbsp;Zhentao Peng,&nbsp;Hui Ma,&nbsp;Hancai Qiu,&nbsp;Gefan Wang,&nbsp;Feng Liu,&nbsp;Ruihan Liu,&nbsp;Wanru Song","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70406","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70406","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>As blended learning becomes a new norm in higher education, students' learning behaviours in this context have drawn great concern. To accurately assess these behaviours, this TAM-based mixed-method study first developed a semi-structured interview protocol via literature review, interviewed 10 university students with blended learning experience to preliminarily construct a 3-dimensional framework (behavioural intention, process, feedback), then 297 students from a university in China who have participated in blended learning are randomly selected as the research objects. Exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and reliability tests showed good model fit and scale reliability/validity, indicating the scale has application value and provides ideas for universities to enhance students' positive learning behaviours in blended learning.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146002359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ChatGPT-Generated Versus Teacher-Prepared Read-Aloud Plans: A Comparative Effectiveness Study chatgpt生成与教师准备的朗读计划:一项比较效果研究
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70458
Muhammet Sönmez, Halil İbrahim Öksüz, Seçkin Gök, Kasım Yıldırım

This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of ChatGPT-generated read-aloud plans compared to teacher-prepared read-aloud plans for third-grade elementary school students, specifically focusing on their vocabulary and inference skills. A total of 93 students from a public elementary school participated in the study. The treatment group engaged in ChatGPT-generated read-aloud plans, while the control group participated in teacher-prepared ones. A MANCOVA analysis was conducted to assess the impact of these activities on students' vocabulary and inference skills, controlling for potential covariates. Despite the adequate sample size and statistical power, the results revealed no significant differences between the treatment (ChatGPT-generated) and comparison (teacher-prepared) groups, and the observed effect size was small. These findings suggest that there was no significant difference between the read-aloud plans generated by ChatGPT and those prepared by the teacher, indicating that both types of plans had a similar impact on students' vocabulary and inference skills under the current conditions. The implications of these results for educational practice and the use of AI tools in the classroom are discussed.

本研究旨在检验chatgpt生成的朗读计划与教师为小学三年级学生准备的朗读计划的有效性,特别关注他们的词汇和推理能力。共有93名公立小学的学生参与了这项研究。治疗组参与chatgpt生成的朗读计划,而对照组参与教师准备的朗读计划。在控制了潜在协变量的情况下,进行了MANCOVA分析,以评估这些活动对学生词汇和推理技能的影响。尽管有足够的样本量和统计能力,但结果显示治疗组(chatgpt生成组)和对照组(教师准备组)之间没有显著差异,观察到的效应量很小。这些发现表明,ChatGPT生成的朗读计划与教师准备的朗读计划之间没有显著差异,这表明在当前条件下,这两种计划对学生的词汇和推理能力的影响是相似的。讨论了这些结果对教育实践和在课堂上使用人工智能工具的影响。
{"title":"ChatGPT-Generated Versus Teacher-Prepared Read-Aloud Plans: A Comparative Effectiveness Study","authors":"Muhammet Sönmez,&nbsp;Halil İbrahim Öksüz,&nbsp;Seçkin Gök,&nbsp;Kasım Yıldırım","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70458","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70458","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of ChatGPT-generated read-aloud plans compared to teacher-prepared read-aloud plans for third-grade elementary school students, specifically focusing on their vocabulary and inference skills. A total of 93 students from a public elementary school participated in the study. The treatment group engaged in ChatGPT-generated read-aloud plans, while the control group participated in teacher-prepared ones. A MANCOVA analysis was conducted to assess the impact of these activities on students' vocabulary and inference skills, controlling for potential covariates. Despite the adequate sample size and statistical power, the results revealed no significant differences between the treatment (ChatGPT-generated) and comparison (teacher-prepared) groups, and the observed effect size was small. These findings suggest that there was no significant difference between the read-aloud plans generated by ChatGPT and those prepared by the teacher, indicating that both types of plans had a similar impact on students' vocabulary and inference skills under the current conditions. The implications of these results for educational practice and the use of AI tools in the classroom are discussed.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146002435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European Journal of Education
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1