首页 > 最新文献

European Journal of Education最新文献

英文 中文
University Students' Writing Feedback Literacy in the AI Era: The Interplay of Generative AI Acceptance, Writing Anxiety and Writing Self-Efficacy in Chinese EMI Educational Contexts 人工智能时代大学生的写作反馈素养:中国EMI教育背景下生成式人工智能接受、写作焦虑和写作自我效能感的相互作用
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70478
Changshuang Zhou, Yongliang Wang

As artificial intelligence (AI) tools reshape second language (L2) writing, how technological and psychological factors jointly shape English-medium instruction (EMI) students' writing feedback literacy remains underexplored. Using an online questionnaire with 500 Chinese EMI university students, this study employed structural equation modelling (SEM) to examine how generative AI acceptance, writing anxiety and writing self-efficacy shape students' writing feedback literacy. The results showed that (1) generative AI acceptance positively and significantly predicts students' writing feedback literacy and writing self-efficacy, and negatively predicts writing anxiety; (2) writing self-efficacy positively mediated the relationship between generative AI acceptance and writing feedback literacy, while writing anxiety mediated the relationship by reducing negative emotions; and (3) generative AI acceptance improves writing feedback literacy by raising students' self-efficacy and lowering their writing anxiety. This study broadens understanding of writing feedback literacy in the AI era by clarifying the psychological mechanism linking generative AI acceptance to writing feedback literacy in EMI writing, and offers pedagogical implications for integrating AI-based support to improve EMI students' emotions and feedback engagement.

随着人工智能(AI)工具重塑第二语言(L2)写作,技术和心理因素如何共同塑造英语媒介教学(EMI)学生的写作反馈素养仍未得到充分探讨。通过对500名中国EMI大学生的在线问卷调查,本研究采用结构方程模型(SEM)来研究生成式人工智能接受度、写作焦虑和写作自我效能感如何影响学生的写作反馈素养。结果表明:(1)生成式人工智能接受对学生写作反馈素养和写作自我效能感有显著正向预测,对写作焦虑有负向预测;(2)写作自我效能感正向中介生成人工智能接受与写作反馈素养的关系,而写作焦虑则通过减少负面情绪来中介生成人工智能接受与写作反馈素养的关系;(3)生成式人工智能接受通过提高学生的自我效能感和降低学生的写作焦虑来提高写作反馈素养。本研究通过阐明EMI写作中生成式AI接受与写作反馈素养之间的心理机制,拓宽了对AI时代写作反馈素养的理解,并为整合基于AI的支持以改善EMI学生的情绪和反馈参与提供了教学意义。
{"title":"University Students' Writing Feedback Literacy in the AI Era: The Interplay of Generative AI Acceptance, Writing Anxiety and Writing Self-Efficacy in Chinese EMI Educational Contexts","authors":"Changshuang Zhou,&nbsp;Yongliang Wang","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70478","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70478","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>As artificial intelligence (AI) tools reshape second language (L2) writing, how technological and psychological factors jointly shape English-medium instruction (EMI) students' writing feedback literacy remains underexplored. Using an online questionnaire with 500 Chinese EMI university students, this study employed structural equation modelling (SEM) to examine how generative AI acceptance, writing anxiety and writing self-efficacy shape students' writing feedback literacy. The results showed that (1) generative AI acceptance positively and significantly predicts students' writing feedback literacy and writing self-efficacy, and negatively predicts writing anxiety; (2) writing self-efficacy positively mediated the relationship between generative AI acceptance and writing feedback literacy, while writing anxiety mediated the relationship by reducing negative emotions; and (3) generative AI acceptance improves writing feedback literacy by raising students' self-efficacy and lowering their writing anxiety. This study broadens understanding of writing feedback literacy in the AI era by clarifying the psychological mechanism linking generative AI acceptance to writing feedback literacy in EMI writing, and offers pedagogical implications for integrating AI-based support to improve EMI students' emotions and feedback engagement.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146099460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Resilience as a Differentiating Factor in Professional Identity Profiles: Insights From Chinese In-Service Music Teachers 弹性作为职业认同档案的差异化因素:来自中国在职音乐教师的见解
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70452
Xiaoning Wang, Wei Guo, Yihang Fu

Teacher professional identity is essential to understanding teachers' professional growth, especially in the context of music education. This study adopts a person-centered approach to examine variations in professional identity among Chinese in-service music teachers, with a specific focus on how resilience serves as a differentiating factor. Drawing on survey data from 395 teachers across diverse educational institutions in China, the study employs latent profile analysis (LPA) and identifies three distinct identity profiles: Identity-Challenged, Developing Professionals, and Empowered Professionals. Subsequent multinomial logistic regression analysis reveals that teachers with higher levels of resilience are significantly more likely to belong to the Empowered group, suggesting that resilience is a critical psychological resource in shaping identity coherence. The findings highlight the heterogeneity of teacher identity development, particularly in emotionally demanding educational contexts like music education. This study contributes to teacher education research by highlighting the value of professional development that combines emotional support, resilience-building, and identity-focused reflection, which aims at fostering both the cognitive and emotional growth of teachers as they navigate complex role expectations and institutional pressures.

教师的专业认同对于理解教师的专业成长至关重要,尤其是在音乐教育的背景下。本研究采用以人为本的方法,考察中国在职音乐教师职业认同的差异,并特别关注弹性如何成为区分因素。根据来自中国不同教育机构的395名教师的调查数据,该研究采用了潜在特征分析(LPA),并确定了三种不同的身份特征:身份挑战型、发展型专业人士和赋权型专业人士。随后的多项逻辑回归分析显示,弹性水平较高的教师更有可能属于被授权群体,这表明弹性是形成认同一致性的关键心理资源。研究结果强调了教师身份发展的异质性,特别是在音乐教育等对情感要求很高的教育环境中。本研究通过强调结合情感支持、弹性建设和以身份为中心的反思的专业发展的价值,为教师教育研究做出了贡献,旨在促进教师在应对复杂的角色期望和制度压力时的认知和情感成长。
{"title":"Resilience as a Differentiating Factor in Professional Identity Profiles: Insights From Chinese In-Service Music Teachers","authors":"Xiaoning Wang,&nbsp;Wei Guo,&nbsp;Yihang Fu","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70452","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70452","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Teacher professional identity is essential to understanding teachers' professional growth, especially in the context of music education. This study adopts a person-centered approach to examine variations in professional identity among Chinese in-service music teachers, with a specific focus on how resilience serves as a differentiating factor. Drawing on survey data from 395 teachers across diverse educational institutions in China, the study employs latent profile analysis (LPA) and identifies three distinct identity profiles: Identity-Challenged, Developing Professionals, and Empowered Professionals. Subsequent multinomial logistic regression analysis reveals that teachers with higher levels of resilience are significantly more likely to belong to the Empowered group, suggesting that resilience is a critical psychological resource in shaping identity coherence. The findings highlight the heterogeneity of teacher identity development, particularly in emotionally demanding educational contexts like music education. This study contributes to teacher education research by highlighting the value of professional development that combines emotional support, resilience-building, and identity-focused reflection, which aims at fostering both the cognitive and emotional growth of teachers as they navigate complex role expectations and institutional pressures.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146096490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Motivation and Academic Success in Tertiary Education: A Scoping Review on European Countries 高等教育动机与学业成功:欧洲国家的研究综述
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70483
Rebecca Ghio, Elena De Gioannis

The motivations that push young people to enrol in tertiary education have been long analysed, and many studies have tested the association between motivations and academic success. The paper aimed to systematically review these studies and summarise their findings regarding (1) how motivation is conceptualised, (2) how academic success is measured, and (3) the association between motivation and academic success. We selected 13 studies. The comparison of their findings suggested that most studies measured motivation based on the Academic Motivation Scale, still with some differences, that is, some identified motivational profiles while the others distinguished among intrinsic, extrinsic and lack of motivation. Academic success was mainly measured using performance during the academic year, while it was rarely inferred from the completion of the path. Finally, most studies found a positive and statistically significant association between academic success and intrinsic motivation, while results on extrinsic motivation were mixed and inconclusive.

长期以来,人们一直在分析促使年轻人接受高等教育的动机,许多研究也测试了动机与学业成功之间的关系。本文旨在系统地回顾这些研究并总结他们在以下方面的发现:(1)动机是如何概念化的;(2)如何衡量学业成功的;(3)动机与学业成功之间的关系。我们选择了13项研究。研究结果的比较表明,大多数研究都是基于学术动机量表来衡量动机,但仍存在一些差异,即一些研究确定了动机特征,而另一些研究则区分了内在动机、外在动机和缺乏动机。学业上的成功主要是用学年的表现来衡量的,而很少从完成学业来推断。最后,大多数研究发现,学业成功与内在动机之间存在显著的正相关关系,而外在动机的研究结果则参差不齐,尚无定论。
{"title":"Motivation and Academic Success in Tertiary Education: A Scoping Review on European Countries","authors":"Rebecca Ghio,&nbsp;Elena De Gioannis","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70483","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70483","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The motivations that push young people to enrol in tertiary education have been long analysed, and many studies have tested the association between motivations and academic success. The paper aimed to systematically review these studies and summarise their findings regarding (1) how motivation is conceptualised, (2) how academic success is measured, and (3) the association between motivation and academic success. We selected 13 studies. The comparison of their findings suggested that most studies measured motivation based on the Academic Motivation Scale, still with some differences, that is, some identified motivational profiles while the others distinguished among intrinsic, extrinsic and lack of motivation. Academic success was mainly measured using performance during the academic year, while it was rarely inferred from the completion of the path. Finally, most studies found a positive and statistically significant association between academic success and intrinsic motivation, while results on extrinsic motivation were mixed and inconclusive.</p>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.70483","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146099461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early Childhood Teachers' Perceptions of Risky Play: A Scoping Review 幼儿教师对风险游戏的认知:范围评估
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70477
Ying Li, Ying Zhang, Min Wang

Risky play, which involves thrilling, exciting activities with the risk of physical injury, has been associated with some crucial developmental consequences in the physical, social and emotional domains of children. Despite the fact that a number of studies have managed to provide insight into how early childhood teachers perceive risky play, there remains a lack of a comprehensive review to present these perspectives. As such, this scoping review was conducted to provide a synthesis of existing evidence on risky play perceptions of teachers in early childhood education (ECE) settings. Using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework and the PRISMA checklist, four major databases were searched, and 18 empirical studies met the inclusion criteria. The results reveal that the teachers recognise the value of the broad developmental risky play; however, they demonstrate concerns about safety, responsibility and accountability in ECE settings, which are influenced by interacting factors. Therefore, this article offers a comprehensive construct that can assist a wide range of stakeholders, including educators, policymakers and regulatory agencies, in navigating the complex contexts that shape early childhood teachers' perceptions of risky play. The research in the future ought to examine how the early childhood teachers' perceptions of risky play influence their pedagogical choice and classroom activities, cross-cultural differences in these perceptions and teaching approaches and evaluate the long-term effects of the professional development on both pedagogical strategies and children's engagement in risky play.

冒险游戏,包括惊险刺激的活动,有身体受伤的风险,与儿童身体、社会和情感领域的一些重要发展后果有关。尽管事实上,许多研究已经设法提供了关于幼儿教师如何看待冒险游戏的见解,但仍然缺乏全面的审查来呈现这些观点。因此,这项范围审查是为了提供一个关于幼儿教育(ECE)环境中教师风险游戏认知的现有证据的综合。采用Joanna Briggs研究所的方法框架和PRISMA检查表,检索了4个主要数据库,有18个实证研究符合纳入标准。结果表明:教师认识到发展性风险游戏的价值;但是,它们对欧洲经委会环境中的安全、责任和问责制表示关切,这些环境受到相互作用因素的影响。因此,本文提供了一个全面的结构,可以帮助广泛的利益相关者,包括教育工作者,政策制定者和监管机构,在引导形成幼儿教师对风险游戏的看法的复杂背景。未来的研究应该考察幼儿教师对风险游戏的看法如何影响他们的教学选择和课堂活动,这些看法和教学方法的跨文化差异,并评估专业发展对教学策略和儿童参与风险游戏的长期影响。
{"title":"Early Childhood Teachers' Perceptions of Risky Play: A Scoping Review","authors":"Ying Li,&nbsp;Ying Zhang,&nbsp;Min Wang","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70477","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70477","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Risky play, which involves thrilling, exciting activities with the risk of physical injury, has been associated with some crucial developmental consequences in the physical, social and emotional domains of children. Despite the fact that a number of studies have managed to provide insight into how early childhood teachers perceive risky play, there remains a lack of a comprehensive review to present these perspectives. As such, this scoping review was conducted to provide a synthesis of existing evidence on risky play perceptions of teachers in early childhood education (ECE) settings. Using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological framework and the PRISMA checklist, four major databases were searched, and 18 empirical studies met the inclusion criteria. The results reveal that the teachers recognise the value of the broad developmental risky play; however, they demonstrate concerns about safety, responsibility and accountability in ECE settings, which are influenced by interacting factors. Therefore, this article offers a comprehensive construct that can assist a wide range of stakeholders, including educators, policymakers and regulatory agencies, in navigating the complex contexts that shape early childhood teachers' perceptions of risky play. The research in the future ought to examine how the early childhood teachers' perceptions of risky play influence their pedagogical choice and classroom activities, cross-cultural differences in these perceptions and teaching approaches and evaluate the long-term effects of the professional development on both pedagogical strategies and children's engagement in risky play.</p>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.70477","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Systematic Review of Teacher Prerequisites for Integrating Technology-Supported Formative Assessment in K–12 STEM Education 在K-12 STEM教育中整合技术支持形成性评估的教师先决条件的系统回顾
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70474
Xiru Huang, Haozhe Jiang, Wenye Zhou, Ritesh Chugh

As technology continues to grow in significance and popularity, a noticeable gap persists in understanding its potential to support formative assessment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) classroom practices for K–12 students. This study systematically reviewed 39 empirical articles to identify the prerequisites that teachers should possess to use technology-supported formative assessment in STEM classrooms. This study conducted a systematic review, in which the educational settings, teaching subjects, research methodologies, technology types, and teacher prerequisites were coded and analysed. The review revealed that the number of articles focusing on junior high education exceeded those on primary and senior high education. Science and mathematics were the most frequently researched subjects, with very few studies exploring integrated STEM teaching. Qualitative and mixed-method approaches dominated the research methodologies. Both hardware, such as interactive whiteboards, and software tools, such as Math-Mapper, were identified as essential components facilitating formative assessments, with a trend toward their combined use to enhance classroom interaction and provide more effective student feedback. The findings also highlight 16 teacher prerequisites for effective technology-supported formative assessment in STEM education, which are organised into three overarching categories: knowledge and skill factors, social factors, and psychological factors, echoing classifications found in prior research. This review provides actionable insights and recommendations to inform STEM teacher professional development programs and contributes to the broader discourse on technology integration in STEM education.

随着技术的重要性和受欢迎程度不断提高,在理解其支持K-12学生在科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)课堂实践中形成性评估的潜力方面,仍然存在明显的差距。本研究系统地回顾了39篇实证文章,以确定教师在STEM课堂中使用技术支持的形成性评估应具备的先决条件。本研究进行了系统回顾,对教育环境、教学科目、研究方法、技术类型和教师先决条件进行编码和分析。调查显示,关注初中教育的文章数量超过了关注小学和高中教育的文章数量。科学和数学是最常见的研究科目,很少有研究探索综合STEM教学。定性和混合方法的研究方法占主导地位。硬件(如交互式白板)和软件工具(如Math-Mapper)都被认为是促进形成性评估的重要组成部分,它们的结合使用有增强课堂互动和提供更有效的学生反馈的趋势。研究结果还强调了教师在STEM教育中进行有效的技术支持形成性评估的16个先决条件,这些先决条件分为三大类:知识和技能因素、社会因素和心理因素,与先前研究中的分类相呼应。本综述提供了可操作的见解和建议,为STEM教师的专业发展计划提供信息,并有助于更广泛地讨论STEM教育中的技术整合。
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Teacher Prerequisites for Integrating Technology-Supported Formative Assessment in K–12 STEM Education","authors":"Xiru Huang,&nbsp;Haozhe Jiang,&nbsp;Wenye Zhou,&nbsp;Ritesh Chugh","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70474","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70474","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>As technology continues to grow in significance and popularity, a noticeable gap persists in understanding its potential to support formative assessment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) classroom practices for K–12 students. This study systematically reviewed 39 empirical articles to identify the prerequisites that teachers should possess to use technology-supported formative assessment in STEM classrooms. This study conducted a systematic review, in which the educational settings, teaching subjects, research methodologies, technology types, and teacher prerequisites were coded and analysed. The review revealed that the number of articles focusing on junior high education exceeded those on primary and senior high education. Science and mathematics were the most frequently researched subjects, with very few studies exploring integrated STEM teaching. Qualitative and mixed-method approaches dominated the research methodologies. Both hardware, such as interactive whiteboards, and software tools, such as Math-Mapper, were identified as essential components facilitating formative assessments, with a trend toward their combined use to enhance classroom interaction and provide more effective student feedback. The findings also highlight 16 teacher prerequisites for effective technology-supported formative assessment in STEM education, which are organised into three overarching categories: knowledge and skill factors, social factors, and psychological factors, echoing classifications found in prior research. This review provides actionable insights and recommendations to inform STEM teacher professional development programs and contributes to the broader discourse on technology integration in STEM education.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146099393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to ‘Educational Resource Allocation and Management of Life Adaptation Curricula: Addressing Regional Inequalities in Special Needs Education’ 对“生活适应课程的教育资源配置与管理:解决特殊需要教育的地区不平等”的修正
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70463

Qijiao Qian, Yiqian Chen, Khalaf Alfadeed, Wejdan Deebani. Educational Resource Allocation and Management of Life Adaptation Curricula: Addressing Regional Inequalities in Special Needs Education. European Journal of Education, 61(1), e70410. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70410

The third author's name was published as: Khalaf Alshammari

It should have been: Khalaf Alfadeed

The name has been corrected in the article. We apologise for this error.

钱启姣,陈一茜,Khalaf Alfadeed, Wejdan Deebani。生活适应课程的教育资源分配与管理:解决特殊需要教育的地区不平等问题。教育科学学报,21(1),344 - 344。https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70410The第三作者的名字被发表为:Khalaf alshammarii,它应该是:Khalaf alfaded文章中的名字已被更正。我们为这个错误道歉。
{"title":"Correction to ‘Educational Resource Allocation and Management of Life Adaptation Curricula: Addressing Regional Inequalities in Special Needs Education’","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70463","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70463","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Qijiao Qian, Yiqian Chen, Khalaf Alfadeed, Wejdan Deebani. Educational Resource Allocation and Management of Life Adaptation Curricula: Addressing Regional Inequalities in Special Needs Education. <i>European Journal of Education</i>, 61(1), e70410. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70410</p><p>The third author's name was published as: Khalaf <b>Alshammari</b></p><p>It should have been: Khalaf <b>Alfadeed</b></p><p>The name has been corrected in the article. We apologise for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.70463","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Constructing and Validating the AIPACK Scale: Measuring Teachers' AI Pedagogical Content Knowledge AIPACK量表的构建与验证:教师人工智能教学内容知识的测量
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70464
Bor-Chen Kuo, Pei-Chen Wu, Ya-Ching Fan, Chen-Huei Liao

This study developed and validated the Artificial Intelligence Pedagogical Content Knowledge (AIPACK) scale to assess the AI-related instructional knowledge of primary and secondary school teachers in Taiwan. The scale includes four dimensions: AI Knowledge (AIK), AI Content Knowledge (AICK), AI Pedagogical Knowledge (AIPK), and AI Pedagogical Content Knowledge (AIPACK). Valid responses from 200 participants were analysed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), resulting in a finalised 26-item scale with a four-factor structure. The CFA results indicated good model fit. All factor loadings exceeded 0.60, and both the average variance extracted (AVE) and composite reliability (CR) met the recommended thresholds, indicating strong construct validity and internal consistency. Measurement invariance was established across gender and teaching roles (preservice vs. in-service), enabling valid cross-group comparisons. The findings support the AIPACK scale's reliability and validity as a tool for evaluating teachers' AI-related instructional knowledge and offer a foundation for future research, training, and policy.

本研究开发并验证人工智能教学内容知识量表(AIPACK),以评估台湾地区中小学教师的人工智能相关教学知识。该量表包括四个维度:AI知识(AIK)、AI内容知识(aiick)、AI教学知识(AIPK)和AI教学内容知识(AIPACK)。使用验证性因子分析(CFA)对200名参与者的有效回答进行了分析,最终得出了具有四因素结构的26项量表。CFA结果表明模型拟合良好。所有因子载荷均超过0.60,平均方差提取(AVE)和复合信度(CR)均达到推荐阈值,表明结构效度和内部一致性较强。在性别和教学角色(职前与在职)之间建立了测量不变性,从而实现了有效的跨组比较。研究结果支持AIPACK量表作为评估教师人工智能相关教学知识的工具的信度和效度,并为未来的研究、培训和政策提供基础。
{"title":"Constructing and Validating the AIPACK Scale: Measuring Teachers' AI Pedagogical Content Knowledge","authors":"Bor-Chen Kuo,&nbsp;Pei-Chen Wu,&nbsp;Ya-Ching Fan,&nbsp;Chen-Huei Liao","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70464","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70464","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study developed and validated the Artificial Intelligence Pedagogical Content Knowledge (AIPACK) scale to assess the AI-related instructional knowledge of primary and secondary school teachers in Taiwan. The scale includes four dimensions: AI Knowledge (AIK), AI Content Knowledge (AICK), AI Pedagogical Knowledge (AIPK), and AI Pedagogical Content Knowledge (AIPACK). Valid responses from 200 participants were analysed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), resulting in a finalised 26-item scale with a four-factor structure. The CFA results indicated good model fit. All factor loadings exceeded 0.60, and both the average variance extracted (AVE) and composite reliability (CR) met the recommended thresholds, indicating strong construct validity and internal consistency. Measurement invariance was established across gender and teaching roles (preservice vs. in-service), enabling valid cross-group comparisons. The findings support the AIPACK scale's reliability and validity as a tool for evaluating teachers' AI-related instructional knowledge and offer a foundation for future research, training, and policy.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146057877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advancing Early Childhood Music Education: A Three-Decade Review of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Instructional Developments 推进幼儿音乐教育:认知、语言和教学发展的三十年回顾
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70467
Qiang Li, Yi-Li Chang

Early Childhood Music Education (ECME) has been recognised for its significant contributions not only to the development of musical abilities and creative thinking, but also to children's academic achievement, socio-emotional competence, and language acquisition. However, systematic reviews focusing specifically on music education within early childhood contexts remain scarce. To address this gap, this study conducted a bibliometric analysis of 643 publications using CiteSpace and VOSviewer. The analysis identified key contributors (e.g., Ilari, Beatriz; Trainor, Laurel J.; Bautista, Alfredo), high-output countries (e.g., the United States, China, Canada), leading institutions (e.g., McMaster University, University of Toronto, University of Southern California, and The Education University of Hong Kong), and core journals (e.g., Music Education Research, International Journal of Music Education, Journal of Research in Music Education). Four major thematic directions were extracted: perception of musical elements and neural plasticity, ECME curriculum development and teacher professionalism, music training and its effects on cognitive and language development, and children's behaviour and mental health. Additionally, burst term analysis revealed two emerging research frontiers: the impact of ECME on children's self-regulation and the integration of digital technologies to enhance teacher development. These findings offer a comprehensive overview of the field and provide valuable insights for future research and practice in ECME.

幼儿音乐教育(ECME)不仅对音乐能力和创造性思维的发展做出了重要贡献,而且对儿童的学业成就、社会情感能力和语言习得也有重要贡献。然而,专门关注儿童早期音乐教育的系统评论仍然很少。为了解决这一差距,本研究使用CiteSpace和VOSviewer对643篇出版物进行了文献计量学分析。该分析确定了主要贡献者(如Ilari, Beatriz, Trainor, Laurel J., Bautista, Alfredo),高产出国家(如美国,中国,加拿大),领先机构(如麦克马斯特大学,多伦多大学,南加州大学和香港教育大学)和核心期刊(如音乐教育研究,国际音乐教育杂志,音乐教育研究杂志)。提取了四个主要的主题方向:音乐元素感知与神经可塑性、ECME课程开发与教师专业化、音乐训练及其对认知和语言发展的影响、儿童行为和心理健康。此外,burst term分析揭示了两个新兴的研究前沿:ECME对儿童自我调节的影响和数字技术的整合促进教师发展。这些发现提供了该领域的全面概述,并为ECME的未来研究和实践提供了有价值的见解。
{"title":"Advancing Early Childhood Music Education: A Three-Decade Review of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Instructional Developments","authors":"Qiang Li,&nbsp;Yi-Li Chang","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70467","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70467","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Early Childhood Music Education (ECME) has been recognised for its significant contributions not only to the development of musical abilities and creative thinking, but also to children's academic achievement, socio-emotional competence, and language acquisition. However, systematic reviews focusing specifically on music education within early childhood contexts remain scarce. To address this gap, this study conducted a bibliometric analysis of 643 publications using CiteSpace and VOSviewer. The analysis identified key contributors (e.g., Ilari, Beatriz; Trainor, Laurel J.; Bautista, Alfredo), high-output countries (e.g., the United States, China, Canada), leading institutions (e.g., McMaster University, University of Toronto, University of Southern California, and The Education University of Hong Kong), and core journals (e.g., Music Education Research, International Journal of Music Education, Journal of Research in Music Education). Four major thematic directions were extracted: perception of musical elements and neural plasticity, ECME curriculum development and teacher professionalism, music training and its effects on cognitive and language development, and children's behaviour and mental health. Additionally, burst term analysis revealed two emerging research frontiers: the impact of ECME on children's self-regulation and the integration of digital technologies to enhance teacher development. These findings offer a comprehensive overview of the field and provide valuable insights for future research and practice in ECME.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146099450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Investigating the Educational Impact of Robotics Classrooms on Problem-Solving Skills and Cognitive Development Among Higher Education Students 研究机器人课堂对高等教育学生解决问题能力和认知发展的教育影响
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70459
Xinyu Liu, Yunhua Deng

Despite growing interest in robotics-based education, limited research has examined how such learning environments influence both cognitive development and problem-solving skills in tertiary education, particularly regarding their interactive effects on student engagement. Addressing this gap, the present study investigates the impact of robotics classrooms on 508 college students' cognitive development, problem-solving abilities, and engagement with robotics activities. Data were collected through Wenjuanxing, an online platform, using a structured questionnaire comprising four sections: demographic information, the Cognitive Development Scale (CDS), the Problem-Solving Inventory (PSI), and the Robotics Engagement and Attitudes Questionnaire (REAQ). After data cleaning, analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 27) for descriptive statistics, correlations, and regression, and AMOS (version 24) for structural equation modelling (SEM). Results indicated a significant positive correlation among cognitive development, problem-solving skills, and robotics engagement (r = 0.52–0.68, p < 0.001). Cognitive development emerged as a moderate to strong predictor of robotics engagement (β = 0.47, p < 0.001), while problem-solving skills also served as a strong predictor (β = 0.51, p < 0.001). Together, these variables explained a substantial proportion of variance in robotics engagement (adjusted R2 = 0.56). SEM analyses further revealed that problem-solving skills partially mediated the relationship between cognitive development and robotics engagement (indirect effect = 0.24, p < 0.001). These findings highlight the value of robotics-based education, providing practical guidance for instructors and curriculum designers to create learning experiences that foster higher-order thinking and strategic problem-solving, thereby enhancing technology-enhanced educational outcomes in higher education.

尽管人们对基于机器人的教育越来越感兴趣,但很少有研究调查这种学习环境如何影响高等教育中的认知发展和解决问题的能力,特别是它们对学生参与度的互动影响。为了弥补这一差距,本研究调查了机器人课堂对508名大学生认知发展、解决问题能力和参与机器人活动的影响。数据通过在线平台“问答行”收集,采用结构化问卷,包括四个部分:人口统计信息、认知发展量表(CDS)、问题解决量表(PSI)和机器人参与与态度问卷(REAQ)。数据清洗后,使用SPSS(版本27)进行描述性统计、相关性和回归分析,使用AMOS(版本24)进行结构方程建模(SEM)分析。结果显示认知发展、解决问题能力和机器人参与之间存在显著的正相关(r = 0.52-0.68, p < 0.001)。认知发展是机器人参与的一个中等到强烈的预测因子(β = 0.47, p < 0.001),而解决问题的能力也是一个强烈的预测因子(β = 0.51, p < 0.001)。总之,这些变量解释了机器人参与的很大一部分方差(调整后的R2 = 0.56)。扫描电镜分析进一步表明,解决问题的能力部分介导了认知发展和机器人参与之间的关系(间接效应= 0.24,p < 0.001)。这些发现突出了基于机器人的教育的价值,为教师和课程设计师提供了实践指导,以创造培养高阶思维和战略问题解决的学习体验,从而提高高等教育中技术增强的教育成果。
{"title":"Investigating the Educational Impact of Robotics Classrooms on Problem-Solving Skills and Cognitive Development Among Higher Education Students","authors":"Xinyu Liu,&nbsp;Yunhua Deng","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70459","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70459","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Despite growing interest in robotics-based education, limited research has examined how such learning environments influence both cognitive development and problem-solving skills in tertiary education, particularly regarding their interactive effects on student engagement. Addressing this gap, the present study investigates the impact of robotics classrooms on 508 college students' cognitive development, problem-solving abilities, and engagement with robotics activities. Data were collected through Wenjuanxing, an online platform, using a structured questionnaire comprising four sections: demographic information, the Cognitive Development Scale (CDS), the Problem-Solving Inventory (PSI), and the Robotics Engagement and Attitudes Questionnaire (REAQ). After data cleaning, analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 27) for descriptive statistics, correlations, and regression, and AMOS (version 24) for structural equation modelling (SEM). Results indicated a significant positive correlation among cognitive development, problem-solving skills, and robotics engagement (<i>r</i> = 0.52–0.68, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Cognitive development emerged as a moderate to strong predictor of robotics engagement (β = 0.47, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), while problem-solving skills also served as a strong predictor (β = 0.51, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Together, these variables explained a substantial proportion of variance in robotics engagement (adjusted <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.56). SEM analyses further revealed that problem-solving skills partially mediated the relationship between cognitive development and robotics engagement (indirect effect = 0.24, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). These findings highlight the value of robotics-based education, providing practical guidance for instructors and curriculum designers to create learning experiences that foster higher-order thinking and strategic problem-solving, thereby enhancing technology-enhanced educational outcomes in higher education.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146099222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incorporating Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (AI) Into Teaching Chinese as a Second Language in Higher Education: Unveiling the Potential Challenges and Opportunities 将机器人和人工智能(AI)融入高等教育汉语教学:揭示潜在的挑战和机遇
IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2026-01-18 DOI: 10.1111/ejed.70442
Xuesong Dong, Hong Wang

The use of cutting-edge technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics in language education has recently captured the attention of many scholars across the world. However, the potential and challenges of incorporating such technologies in Chinese as a second language (CSL) at the higher education level have been widely overlooked in the literature. Most of the studies in this area revolve around the English language. To address the gaps, this study adopted a qualitative study through a semi-structured interview, held in English, with a sample of 42 higher education Chinese teachers teaching CSL. The results of thematic analysis demonstrated that incorporating AI and robotics in CSL classes had been beneficial for ‘reducing teachers’ workload and burden’, ‘diversifying teaching resources and materials’, ‘personalizing and aligning teaching to students' needs and interests’ and ‘increasing teachers’ teaching efficacy’. Moreover, it was found that using these technologies produces some challenges for CSL teachers because they need ‘teacher training’ and ‘financial support and infrastructures' and reduces CSL students’ ‘creativity and critical thinking’ and ‘interpersonal communication and interaction’. The findings are discussed and implications at the theoretical and practical levels are presented to increase CSL teachers’ knowledge and skills pertaining to AI and robot-mediated language education in light of educational technology frameworks. Moreover, actionable recommendations for CSL professional development, policy enactment and resource allocation in technology-enhanced classrooms are provided.

最近,人工智能(AI)和机器人技术等尖端技术在语言教育中的应用引起了世界各地许多学者的关注。然而,将这些技术纳入高等教育的潜力和挑战在文献中被广泛忽视。这一领域的大部分研究都围绕着英语语言展开。为了解决这一差距,本研究采用了一种定性研究,通过半结构化访谈,用英语进行,样本为42名高等教育汉语教师。专题分析结果表明,人工智能和机器人技术在汉语课堂教学中具有“减轻教师的工作量和负担”、“丰富教学资源和教材”、“个性化教学,使教学符合学生的需求和兴趣”、“提高教师的教学效能”等优点。此外,我们还发现这些技术的使用给对外汉语教师带来了一些挑战,因为他们需要“教师培训”和“资金支持和基础设施”,并且降低了对外汉语学生的“创造力和批判性思维”以及“人际沟通和互动”。本文对研究结果进行了讨论,并提出了理论和实践层面的启示,以提高汉语教学教师在教育技术框架下与人工智能和机器人介导的语言教育相关的知识和技能。此外,本研究亦就科技教室的专业发展、政策制定及资源分配提供可行的建议。
{"title":"Incorporating Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (AI) Into Teaching Chinese as a Second Language in Higher Education: Unveiling the Potential Challenges and Opportunities","authors":"Xuesong Dong,&nbsp;Hong Wang","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70442","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The use of cutting-edge technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics in language education has recently captured the attention of many scholars across the world. However, the potential and challenges of incorporating such technologies in Chinese as a second language (CSL) at the higher education level have been widely overlooked in the literature. Most of the studies in this area revolve around the English language. To address the gaps, this study adopted a qualitative study through a semi-structured interview, held in English, with a sample of 42 higher education Chinese teachers teaching CSL. The results of thematic analysis demonstrated that incorporating AI and robotics in CSL classes had been beneficial for ‘reducing teachers’ workload and burden’, ‘diversifying teaching resources and materials’, ‘personalizing and aligning teaching to students' needs and interests’ and ‘increasing teachers’ teaching efficacy’. Moreover, it was found that using these technologies produces some challenges for CSL teachers because they need ‘teacher training’ and ‘financial support and infrastructures' and reduces CSL students’ ‘creativity and critical thinking’ and ‘interpersonal communication and interaction’. The findings are discussed and implications at the theoretical and practical levels are presented to increase CSL teachers’ knowledge and skills pertaining to AI and robot-mediated language education in light of educational technology frameworks. Moreover, actionable recommendations for CSL professional development, policy enactment and resource allocation in technology-enhanced classrooms are provided.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European Journal of Education
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1