Pub Date : 2023-06-04DOI: 10.1177/09593535231172592
Suruchi Thapar-Björkert, A. Majumdar, Johanna Gondouin
Vulnerability is a pivotal concept for understanding transnational commercial surrogacy and the ethics of reproductive travel. While implicitly recognizing vulnerability as important, existing scholarship falls short of understanding the dynamism of vulnerability. Placing our empirical analysis in conjunction with the rich theoretical literature on this concept, we explore vulnerability in surrogacy arrangements in India as a “mode of openness,” defined by its multilayeredness and context specificity. We focus on two retellings of vulnerability. In the first narrative, we analyse the journey of an intended parent who becomes an agent, while in the second narrative, we focus on the trajectory of a surrogate and egg donor becoming an agent. In both narratives, the layers of vulnerability across different interconnected circuits of reproduction—of intended parent, agent, and surrogate—are explicated. Our analysis illustrates the complex and conflicting meanings of vulnerability and illustrates vulnerability as an instigator of agency and resistance; how it can propel upward social mobility and animate attempts to transform an unjust system, but also how such individual agency and empowerment may serve to uphold exploitative relationships.
{"title":"“There are two sides to everything”: Re (locating) vulnerability in the surrogacy industry in India","authors":"Suruchi Thapar-Björkert, A. Majumdar, Johanna Gondouin","doi":"10.1177/09593535231172592","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535231172592","url":null,"abstract":"Vulnerability is a pivotal concept for understanding transnational commercial surrogacy and the ethics of reproductive travel. While implicitly recognizing vulnerability as important, existing scholarship falls short of understanding the dynamism of vulnerability. Placing our empirical analysis in conjunction with the rich theoretical literature on this concept, we explore vulnerability in surrogacy arrangements in India as a “mode of openness,” defined by its multilayeredness and context specificity. We focus on two retellings of vulnerability. In the first narrative, we analyse the journey of an intended parent who becomes an agent, while in the second narrative, we focus on the trajectory of a surrogate and egg donor becoming an agent. In both narratives, the layers of vulnerability across different interconnected circuits of reproduction—of intended parent, agent, and surrogate—are explicated. Our analysis illustrates the complex and conflicting meanings of vulnerability and illustrates vulnerability as an instigator of agency and resistance; how it can propel upward social mobility and animate attempts to transform an unjust system, but also how such individual agency and empowerment may serve to uphold exploitative relationships.","PeriodicalId":47643,"journal":{"name":"Feminism & Psychology","volume":"17 1","pages":"335 - 356"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2023-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80894971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-30DOI: 10.1177/09593535221139135
Özge Savaş, S. Caulfield, Hanna Smith, M. House, A. Stewart
Vulnerability is a standard criterion used by state and non-governmental organizations to identify groups of people in need of protection or support. Over the past two decades, however, this notoriously ill-defined and potentially stigmatizing term has been subjected to scrutiny by researchers, service providers, and theorists across multiple disciplines. This study examines the relevance of vulnerability to the ways international feminist activists who were interviewed between 2003 and 2019 for the Global Feminisms Project (GFP) described their struggles for women's rights in various settings over the past 50 years. Citing examples from nine countries, we show that these activists rarely used the term vulnerable, and never to classify groups of people. Instead, they frequently explained how particular groups were subjected to precarious conditions, and how they resisted subjugation, within multiple layers of gendered social relations and political structures. Many activists connected their locally-grounded work to global historical processes, emphasizing particularly the impact of neo-liberalism. Although using different vocabularies, these analyses resonate with work by bioethicists and feminist/queer theorists who reject the use of vulnerability as a classificatory term but embrace it as a tool for analyzing subjugation, building solidarity, and challenging neo-liberal conceptions of individual autonomy.
{"title":"Vulnerability and empowerment on the ground: Activist perspectives from the global feminisms project","authors":"Özge Savaş, S. Caulfield, Hanna Smith, M. House, A. Stewart","doi":"10.1177/09593535221139135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535221139135","url":null,"abstract":"Vulnerability is a standard criterion used by state and non-governmental organizations to identify groups of people in need of protection or support. Over the past two decades, however, this notoriously ill-defined and potentially stigmatizing term has been subjected to scrutiny by researchers, service providers, and theorists across multiple disciplines. This study examines the relevance of vulnerability to the ways international feminist activists who were interviewed between 2003 and 2019 for the Global Feminisms Project (GFP) described their struggles for women's rights in various settings over the past 50 years. Citing examples from nine countries, we show that these activists rarely used the term vulnerable, and never to classify groups of people. Instead, they frequently explained how particular groups were subjected to precarious conditions, and how they resisted subjugation, within multiple layers of gendered social relations and political structures. Many activists connected their locally-grounded work to global historical processes, emphasizing particularly the impact of neo-liberalism. Although using different vocabularies, these analyses resonate with work by bioethicists and feminist/queer theorists who reject the use of vulnerability as a classificatory term but embrace it as a tool for analyzing subjugation, building solidarity, and challenging neo-liberal conceptions of individual autonomy.","PeriodicalId":47643,"journal":{"name":"Feminism & Psychology","volume":"88 1","pages":"429 - 446"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78645234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-30DOI: 10.1177/09593535231173232
Emily Foster, Laura Kilby
In this study, we explore motherhood as an interactionally emergent identity category that speakers construct and lay claim to in talk, and as a category that is imbued with moral expectations of how incumbents should behave. We analyse 18 child-focussed debates from British daytime television talk show, This Morning. Engaging a postfeminist framework, we use membership categorisation analysis to explore how, and to what effect, women deploy claims to motherhood. We report three main findings: (a) Speakers routinely quantify their motherhood credentials in the development of a “mother-cum-expert” identity; (b) speakers who construct motherhood in accordance with neoliberal norms of “good motherhood” habitually trump the arguments offered by other speakers, including those with professional expertise; (c) any challenge to essentialist norms of womanhood and/or motherhood become accountable matters. We conclude that whilst there is power in motherhood insomuch as it vests some women with expertise and elevates their rights to be heard on child-focussed matters, the speakers in our study nevertheless construct motherhood in a manner that (re)produces and elevates essentialised notions of gender and narrow versions of motherhood.
{"title":"“Speaking as a mother”: A membership categorisation analysis of child-centric talk in a UK daytime television talk show","authors":"Emily Foster, Laura Kilby","doi":"10.1177/09593535231173232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535231173232","url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we explore motherhood as an interactionally emergent identity category that speakers construct and lay claim to in talk, and as a category that is imbued with moral expectations of how incumbents should behave. We analyse 18 child-focussed debates from British daytime television talk show, This Morning. Engaging a postfeminist framework, we use membership categorisation analysis to explore how, and to what effect, women deploy claims to motherhood. We report three main findings: (a) Speakers routinely quantify their motherhood credentials in the development of a “mother-cum-expert” identity; (b) speakers who construct motherhood in accordance with neoliberal norms of “good motherhood” habitually trump the arguments offered by other speakers, including those with professional expertise; (c) any challenge to essentialist norms of womanhood and/or motherhood become accountable matters. We conclude that whilst there is power in motherhood insomuch as it vests some women with expertise and elevates their rights to be heard on child-focussed matters, the speakers in our study nevertheless construct motherhood in a manner that (re)produces and elevates essentialised notions of gender and narrow versions of motherhood.","PeriodicalId":47643,"journal":{"name":"Feminism & Psychology","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135541886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-22DOI: 10.1177/09593535231171694
Satu Venäläinen
In this article, I draw on arts-based approaches and new materialist affect theory in order to explore possibilities to attune research outputs to researcher vulnerability. These approaches and theorisations challenge conventional research practices geared toward creating distance between the researcher and their research, and work towards dissolving hierarchical distinctions between assumedly invulnerable researchers and vulnerable participants. In doing so, they pave the way for attuning research work to the complex interplay of difference and sameness as it unfolds and surfaces in the process of researching gendered vulnerabilities. By presenting a piece of poetic writing that engages with research encounters within a project on sexual harassment and young people, I tap into the troubled affect, the constant interplay of difference, shifting alignments, and ultimate entwinements between the researcher, the phenomenon of sexual harassment, and the research participants and other involved actors. Based on my inquiry, I propose attending to vulnerability through affect theory as an encompassing and dynamic state of being affected and affecting others, both in violent ways and in ways that aim to build solidarity and empathy.
{"title":"Am I vulnerable? Researcher positionality and affect in research on gendered vulnerabilities","authors":"Satu Venäläinen","doi":"10.1177/09593535231171694","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535231171694","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I draw on arts-based approaches and new materialist affect theory in order to explore possibilities to attune research outputs to researcher vulnerability. These approaches and theorisations challenge conventional research practices geared toward creating distance between the researcher and their research, and work towards dissolving hierarchical distinctions between assumedly invulnerable researchers and vulnerable participants. In doing so, they pave the way for attuning research work to the complex interplay of difference and sameness as it unfolds and surfaces in the process of researching gendered vulnerabilities. By presenting a piece of poetic writing that engages with research encounters within a project on sexual harassment and young people, I tap into the troubled affect, the constant interplay of difference, shifting alignments, and ultimate entwinements between the researcher, the phenomenon of sexual harassment, and the research participants and other involved actors. Based on my inquiry, I propose attending to vulnerability through affect theory as an encompassing and dynamic state of being affected and affecting others, both in violent ways and in ways that aim to build solidarity and empathy.","PeriodicalId":47643,"journal":{"name":"Feminism & Psychology","volume":"15 1","pages":"357 - 375"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77680979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-18DOI: 10.1177/09593535221143595
Adriana Kaulino, Teresa Matus
Since the return to democracy in Chile in 1990, public policies for institutionalized children have progressively adopted the theory of vulnerability, with disastrous results. To expose the violence implied in the vulnerability theory, the article proposes a framework composed of the concept of epistemological violence, the theory of recognition, and the feminist psychological theory of institutional trauma to analyze and interpret public policies for children. This theoretical approach allows us to unveil how the institutional use of vulnerability has become a standardized and naturalized mechanism of violence that (re)produces the trauma the public policies seek to interrupt. In this way, we make visible a chain of failures that provoke severe traumas that drastically reduce their capacity for agency and future opportunities, especially in institutionalized girls and adolescents. The theoretical proposal contributes to future research about social politics, systems, and programs of childhood protection based on rights. We conclude by identifying some limitations and theoretical challenges.
{"title":"Systemic vulnerability: Towards a theoretical framework for identifying institutional failures that violate rights","authors":"Adriana Kaulino, Teresa Matus","doi":"10.1177/09593535221143595","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535221143595","url":null,"abstract":"Since the return to democracy in Chile in 1990, public policies for institutionalized children have progressively adopted the theory of vulnerability, with disastrous results. To expose the violence implied in the vulnerability theory, the article proposes a framework composed of the concept of epistemological violence, the theory of recognition, and the feminist psychological theory of institutional trauma to analyze and interpret public policies for children. This theoretical approach allows us to unveil how the institutional use of vulnerability has become a standardized and naturalized mechanism of violence that (re)produces the trauma the public policies seek to interrupt. In this way, we make visible a chain of failures that provoke severe traumas that drastically reduce their capacity for agency and future opportunities, especially in institutionalized girls and adolescents. The theoretical proposal contributes to future research about social politics, systems, and programs of childhood protection based on rights. We conclude by identifying some limitations and theoretical challenges.","PeriodicalId":47643,"journal":{"name":"Feminism & Psychology","volume":"24 1","pages":"411 - 428"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85910313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01Epub Date: 2022-05-26DOI: 10.1177/09593535221102224
Annette Brömdal, Sherree Halliwell, Tait Sanders, Kirsty A Clark, Jessica Gildersleeve, Amy B Mullens, Tania M Phillips, Joseph Debattista, Carol du Plessis, Kirstie Daken, Jaclyn M W Hughto
Trans women incarcerated throughout the world have been described as "vulnerable populations" due to significant victimization, mistreatment, lack of gender-affirming care, and human rights violations, which confers greater risk of trauma, self-harm, and suicide compared with the general incarcerated population. Most incarceration settings around the world are segregated by the person's sex characteristics (i.e., male or female) and governed by strong cis and gender normative paradigms. This analysis seeks to better understand and appreciate how the "instructions" and the "authorities" that regulate trans women's corporeal representation, housing options and sense of self-determination implicate and affect their agency and actions in handling intimacies related to their personal life. Drawing upon lived incarcerated experiences of 24 trans women in Australia and the United States, and employing Ken Plummer's notion of intimate citizenship, this analysis explores how trans women navigate choices and ways "to do" gender, identities, bodies, emotions, desires and relationships while incarcerated in men's prisons and governed by cis and gender normative paradigms. This critical analysis contributes to understanding how incarcerated trans women through grit, resilience, and ingenuity still navigate ways to embody, express and enact their intimate citizenship in innovative and unique ways.
{"title":"Navigating intimate trans citizenship while incarcerated in Australia and the United States.","authors":"Annette Brömdal, Sherree Halliwell, Tait Sanders, Kirsty A Clark, Jessica Gildersleeve, Amy B Mullens, Tania M Phillips, Joseph Debattista, Carol du Plessis, Kirstie Daken, Jaclyn M W Hughto","doi":"10.1177/09593535221102224","DOIUrl":"10.1177/09593535221102224","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trans women incarcerated throughout the world have been described as \"vulnerable populations\" due to significant victimization, mistreatment, lack of gender-affirming care, and human rights violations, which confers greater risk of trauma, self-harm, and suicide compared with the general incarcerated population. Most incarceration settings around the world are segregated by the person's sex characteristics (i.e., male or female) and governed by strong cis and gender normative paradigms. This analysis seeks to better understand and appreciate how the \"instructions\" and the \"authorities\" that regulate trans women's corporeal representation, housing options and sense of self-determination implicate and affect their agency and actions in handling intimacies related to their personal life. Drawing upon lived incarcerated experiences of 24 trans women in Australia and the United States, and employing Ken Plummer's notion of <i>intimate citizenship</i>, this analysis explores how trans women navigate choices and ways \"to do\" gender, identities, bodies, emotions, desires and relationships while incarcerated in men's prisons and governed by cis and gender normative paradigms. This critical analysis contributes to understanding how incarcerated trans women through grit, resilience, and ingenuity still navigate ways to embody, express and enact their intimate citizenship in innovative and unique ways.</p>","PeriodicalId":47643,"journal":{"name":"Feminism & Psychology","volume":"33 1","pages":"42-64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10139736/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9400167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-03DOI: 10.1177/09593535221132923
Rebecca Helman
Within research on sexual violence, womxn who have been raped are positioned as “vulnerable” participants, while researchers tend to occupy positions of “invulnerability”. Drawing on vulnerable moments from a research project which explored womxn's experiences of rape in South Africa, this paper proposes a (more) vulnerable engagement with narratives of rape. Through attending to how vulnerability is implicated in issues of silence and agency, shame, and my own failures to witness the experiences of my participants with care, I explore the epistemic and ethical possibilities of an affective approach to researching rape. This approach asks us, as researchers, to attend to the moments during our research in which we are affected, moved and disrupted.
{"title":"Attending to vulnerability in sexual violence research","authors":"Rebecca Helman","doi":"10.1177/09593535221132923","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535221132923","url":null,"abstract":"Within research on sexual violence, womxn who have been raped are positioned as “vulnerable” participants, while researchers tend to occupy positions of “invulnerability”. Drawing on vulnerable moments from a research project which explored womxn's experiences of rape in South Africa, this paper proposes a (more) vulnerable engagement with narratives of rape. Through attending to how vulnerability is implicated in issues of silence and agency, shame, and my own failures to witness the experiences of my participants with care, I explore the epistemic and ethical possibilities of an affective approach to researching rape. This approach asks us, as researchers, to attend to the moments during our research in which we are affected, moved and disrupted.","PeriodicalId":47643,"journal":{"name":"Feminism & Psychology","volume":"78 1","pages":"376 - 392"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85031207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-01DOI: 10.1177/09593535221106644
J. Mavuso, R. Chadwick
The governance of reproductive practices, processes, decision-making, experiences, desires, subjectivities, and bodies has received and continues to receive significant attention in feminist efforts to name and resist reproductive oppression. And over the last 30 years, articles published in Feminism & Psychology have made significant contributions to the visibilisation and critique of this form of oppression. In this Virtual Special Issue on Reproductive Governance and the Affective Economy, we apply repronormativity and affect to our reading of 20 articles published in Feminism & Psychology. Collectively, these articles provide a glimpse of the wide-ranging scope of reproductive regulation (including that which is re-produced by/within feminism itself), and the various work that repronormativity and affect do in this governance. The challenging of reproductive governance notwithstanding, we conclude by arguing that the centring and circulation of certain reproductive subjects and their experiences within feminist knowledge production is itself a part of and upholds repronormativity and forecloses the possibility of reproductive freedom for all.
{"title":"Reproductive governance and the affective economy","authors":"J. Mavuso, R. Chadwick","doi":"10.1177/09593535221106644","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535221106644","url":null,"abstract":"The governance of reproductive practices, processes, decision-making, experiences, desires, subjectivities, and bodies has received and continues to receive significant attention in feminist efforts to name and resist reproductive oppression. And over the last 30 years, articles published in Feminism & Psychology have made significant contributions to the visibilisation and critique of this form of oppression. In this Virtual Special Issue on Reproductive Governance and the Affective Economy, we apply repronormativity and affect to our reading of 20 articles published in Feminism & Psychology. Collectively, these articles provide a glimpse of the wide-ranging scope of reproductive regulation (including that which is re-produced by/within feminism itself), and the various work that repronormativity and affect do in this governance. The challenging of reproductive governance notwithstanding, we conclude by arguing that the centring and circulation of certain reproductive subjects and their experiences within feminist knowledge production is itself a part of and upholds repronormativity and forecloses the possibility of reproductive freedom for all.","PeriodicalId":47643,"journal":{"name":"Feminism & Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"559 - 583"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84085410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-01DOI: 10.1177/09593535221133576
A. Locke, R. Capdevila, A. Abeyasekera, Bipasha Ahmed, J. Akhurst, Lutfiye Ali, Kristin Anderson, Eleni Andreouli, Catherine Archer, Aurélie Athan, Rosemary Auchmuty, Rebecca Barnes, Bethan Benwell, Siân Beynon-Jones, Fiona Bloomer, F. Boonzaier, Marlee Bower, Kirsty Budds, E. Burman, Jane Callaghan, Christine Campbell, Hugo Canham, Justin Canty, Julia Carter, B. Catlett, F. Cavazzoni, J. Cermele, Netta Chachamu, R. Chadwick, Jane Chalmers, M. Chiweshe, Marianne Clark, J. Cole, J. Cornell, C. Corradi, S. Crabb, Kathy Davis, Stephanie Davis, Katy Day, João de Oliveira, K. Desborough, N. Dess, A. Devor, N. Donaghue, C. Donovan, S. Duncan, A. Dwyer, N. Edley, Y. Ehrstein, Rochelle Einboden, María-Alejandra Energici, A. Evans, E. Fairchild, Pani Farvid, Tracey Feltham-King, M. Fine, Yvette G. Flores, Jessica Francombe-Webb, Kathryn E Frazier, May Friedman, H. Frith, M. Gamburd, Rosalind Gill, Sarah Gillborn, Jessie Goicoechea, D. Goodley, A. Gouws, Darci Graves, A. Greene, C. Groenewald, Yasmine Hamdi Loza, T
Asha Abeyasekera Bipasha Ahmed Jacqueline Akhurst Lutfiye Ali Kristin Anderson Eleni Andreouli Catherine Archer Aurélie Athan Rosemary Auchmuty Rebecca Barnes Bethan Benwell Siân Beynon-Jones Fiona Bloomer Floretta Boonzaier Marlee Bower Kirsty Budds Erica Burman Jane Callaghan Christine Campbell Hugo Canham Justin Canty Julia Carter Beth Catlett Federica Cavazzoni Jill Cermele Netta Chachamu Rachelle Chadwick Jane Chalmers Malvern Chiweshe Marianne Clark Jenny Cole Josephine Cornell Consuelo Corradi Shona Crabb Kathy Davis Stephanie Davis Katy Day João de Oliveira Karen Desborough Nancy Dess Aaron Devor Ngaire Donaghue Catherine Donovan Simon Duncan Angela Dwyer Nigel Edley Yvonne Ehrstein Rochelle Einboden Reviewer List
{"title":"Thanks to guest editors, manuscript reviewers, and student presentation reviewers","authors":"A. Locke, R. Capdevila, A. Abeyasekera, Bipasha Ahmed, J. Akhurst, Lutfiye Ali, Kristin Anderson, Eleni Andreouli, Catherine Archer, Aurélie Athan, Rosemary Auchmuty, Rebecca Barnes, Bethan Benwell, Siân Beynon-Jones, Fiona Bloomer, F. Boonzaier, Marlee Bower, Kirsty Budds, E. Burman, Jane Callaghan, Christine Campbell, Hugo Canham, Justin Canty, Julia Carter, B. Catlett, F. Cavazzoni, J. Cermele, Netta Chachamu, R. Chadwick, Jane Chalmers, M. Chiweshe, Marianne Clark, J. Cole, J. Cornell, C. Corradi, S. Crabb, Kathy Davis, Stephanie Davis, Katy Day, João de Oliveira, K. Desborough, N. Dess, A. Devor, N. Donaghue, C. Donovan, S. Duncan, A. Dwyer, N. Edley, Y. Ehrstein, Rochelle Einboden, María-Alejandra Energici, A. Evans, E. Fairchild, Pani Farvid, Tracey Feltham-King, M. Fine, Yvette G. Flores, Jessica Francombe-Webb, Kathryn E Frazier, May Friedman, H. Frith, M. Gamburd, Rosalind Gill, Sarah Gillborn, Jessie Goicoechea, D. Goodley, A. Gouws, Darci Graves, A. Greene, C. Groenewald, Yasmine Hamdi Loza, T","doi":"10.1177/09593535221133576","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535221133576","url":null,"abstract":"Asha Abeyasekera Bipasha Ahmed Jacqueline Akhurst Lutfiye Ali Kristin Anderson Eleni Andreouli Catherine Archer Aurélie Athan Rosemary Auchmuty Rebecca Barnes Bethan Benwell Siân Beynon-Jones Fiona Bloomer Floretta Boonzaier Marlee Bower Kirsty Budds Erica Burman Jane Callaghan Christine Campbell Hugo Canham Justin Canty Julia Carter Beth Catlett Federica Cavazzoni Jill Cermele Netta Chachamu Rachelle Chadwick Jane Chalmers Malvern Chiweshe Marianne Clark Jenny Cole Josephine Cornell Consuelo Corradi Shona Crabb Kathy Davis Stephanie Davis Katy Day João de Oliveira Karen Desborough Nancy Dess Aaron Devor Ngaire Donaghue Catherine Donovan Simon Duncan Angela Dwyer Nigel Edley Yvonne Ehrstein Rochelle Einboden Reviewer List","PeriodicalId":47643,"journal":{"name":"Feminism & Psychology","volume":"348 1","pages":"597 - 599"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82584754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-26DOI: 10.1177/09593535221134173
M. García-Ruiz, Paulo Padilla-Petry
The biomedical view of eating disorders (EDs) dominates in their classification and treatment regardless of the importance of sociocultural factors in EDs. Critical feminist approaches to EDs try to relate them to oppressive situations, disempowerment and the construction of gender. Educational interventions with people with EDs may be an alternative to biomedical approaches, giving them opportunities to tell their stories, listen to themselves and take control of their lives. This article presents a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with professionals who carry out educational interventions for people with EDs. Findings show that the biomedical description and treatment of EDs remain unchallenged and recognising client voice may be a problem, even in educational interventions. Also, the potential negative consequences of the rigid control of the clients’ lives seem to be ignored. Feminist approaches to EDs are acknowledged but do not seem to guide any intervention. Sociocultural critical stances that would recognise the coherence or the transitions between what is considered as healthy and sick eating also seem to be lacking.
{"title":"Navigating feminist and biomedical conceptual frameworks in educational interventions for eating disorders: Spanish educators’ understandings of the causes and treatment of eating disorders","authors":"M. García-Ruiz, Paulo Padilla-Petry","doi":"10.1177/09593535221134173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535221134173","url":null,"abstract":"The biomedical view of eating disorders (EDs) dominates in their classification and treatment regardless of the importance of sociocultural factors in EDs. Critical feminist approaches to EDs try to relate them to oppressive situations, disempowerment and the construction of gender. Educational interventions with people with EDs may be an alternative to biomedical approaches, giving them opportunities to tell their stories, listen to themselves and take control of their lives. This article presents a thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with professionals who carry out educational interventions for people with EDs. Findings show that the biomedical description and treatment of EDs remain unchallenged and recognising client voice may be a problem, even in educational interventions. Also, the potential negative consequences of the rigid control of the clients’ lives seem to be ignored. Feminist approaches to EDs are acknowledged but do not seem to guide any intervention. Sociocultural critical stances that would recognise the coherence or the transitions between what is considered as healthy and sick eating also seem to be lacking.","PeriodicalId":47643,"journal":{"name":"Feminism & Psychology","volume":"159 1","pages":"295 - 313"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76698621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：