Pub Date : 2022-07-27DOI: 10.1177/02610183221113171
Karianne Nyheim Stray, O. Thomassen, H. Vike
Judging the extent to which sick-listed clients’ disabilities qualify them for sickness benefits is increasingly part of frontline work. However, we lack knowledge about the discretional process of assessing work ability. Institutional ethnographic research of caseworkers in the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration revealed that they emphasised clients’ residual work ability – meaning what clients could perform despite their medical diagnoses – as well as their inner motivations and work ethic. We argue that frontline praxis is influenced by efforts to fit clients into a category of the deserving ‘sick-listed yet work-capable client’. Because caseworkers lack guidelines to combine health and work, they increasingly apply their ‘moral selves’ in the assessment process resulting in scepticism towards clients’ feigning, or exaggerating symptoms to obtain financial benefits or avoid work. We question whether our findings represent a shift of the Norwegian universalistic welfare model to a more liberal and incentive-strengthening type.
{"title":"Assessing sick-listed clients’ work ability: A moral mission?","authors":"Karianne Nyheim Stray, O. Thomassen, H. Vike","doi":"10.1177/02610183221113171","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183221113171","url":null,"abstract":"Judging the extent to which sick-listed clients’ disabilities qualify them for sickness benefits is increasingly part of frontline work. However, we lack knowledge about the discretional process of assessing work ability. Institutional ethnographic research of caseworkers in the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration revealed that they emphasised clients’ residual work ability – meaning what clients could perform despite their medical diagnoses – as well as their inner motivations and work ethic. We argue that frontline praxis is influenced by efforts to fit clients into a category of the deserving ‘sick-listed yet work-capable client’. Because caseworkers lack guidelines to combine health and work, they increasingly apply their ‘moral selves’ in the assessment process resulting in scepticism towards clients’ feigning, or exaggerating symptoms to obtain financial benefits or avoid work. We question whether our findings represent a shift of the Norwegian universalistic welfare model to a more liberal and incentive-strengthening type.","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"43 1","pages":"448 - 468"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44193614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-03DOI: 10.1177/02610183221105035
U. Buchert, L. Kemppainen, Antero Olakivi, S. Wrede, A. Kouvonen
Governments are rapidly digitalising public services to increase cost-effectiveness of the public sector. This study examines older migrants’ use of digital public health and social welfare services from the perspective of social exclusion. The study uses a mixed methods approach, drawing on representative survey data of Russian-speaking migrants in Finland and qualitative interviews with third-sector representatives who assist Russian-speaking migrants with digital service use. Our quantitative results show that a sizeable proportion of Russian-speaking older adults are excluded from digital services. In particular, those with lower socio-economic status, poor local language skills and without Finnish education are at higher risk of exclusion. Our qualitative results describe the multiple ways the exclusion from digital services intersects with other disadvantages in the everyday lives of Russian-speaking older adults. We argue that digitalisation of these services may foster social exclusion and endanger the realisation of these people's social rights.
{"title":"Is digitalisation of public health and social welfare services reinforcing social exclusion? The case of Russian-speaking older migrants in Finland","authors":"U. Buchert, L. Kemppainen, Antero Olakivi, S. Wrede, A. Kouvonen","doi":"10.1177/02610183221105035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183221105035","url":null,"abstract":"Governments are rapidly digitalising public services to increase cost-effectiveness of the public sector. This study examines older migrants’ use of digital public health and social welfare services from the perspective of social exclusion. The study uses a mixed methods approach, drawing on representative survey data of Russian-speaking migrants in Finland and qualitative interviews with third-sector representatives who assist Russian-speaking migrants with digital service use. Our quantitative results show that a sizeable proportion of Russian-speaking older adults are excluded from digital services. In particular, those with lower socio-economic status, poor local language skills and without Finnish education are at higher risk of exclusion. Our qualitative results describe the multiple ways the exclusion from digital services intersects with other disadvantages in the everyday lives of Russian-speaking older adults. We argue that digitalisation of these services may foster social exclusion and endanger the realisation of these people's social rights.","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"43 1","pages":"375 - 400"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43217411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-30DOI: 10.1177/02610183221109133
C. Griffiths, J. Trebilcock
Drawing on Bacchi’s (2009) ‘What’s the problem represented to be?’ framework, this article provides a critical analysis of HM Government’s (2021a) New Plan for Immigration. We explore how immigration is problematised, the assumptions that underlie these problematisations, alternative ways of representing the ‘problem’ of immigration, and the possible effects of the proposed reforms. Our article demonstrates how the New Plan is increasingly hostile towards, not only ‘illegal’ migrants, but an ever-widening group of people and organisations who may be viewed as facilitating illegal entry (organised criminals, hauliers) and/or those held responsible for preventing/delaying their removal (lawyers). The government’s proposals risk creating a two-tiered system, increasing the exclusion experienced by those seeking asylum, and widening the net of those held responsible for immigration control. Ultimately, we conclude that while the sentiments behind the government’s New Plan may not be all that ‘new’, they are nevertheless significant for their continuation and intensification of existing hostile policies and practices relating to immigration in the UK. This is especially so, given a number of recent global events that could have provided an opportunity to disrupt the government’s problematisation of, and hostility towards, people seeking refuge.
{"title":"Continued and intensified hostility: The problematisation of immigration in the UK government’s 2021 New Plan for Immigration","authors":"C. Griffiths, J. Trebilcock","doi":"10.1177/02610183221109133","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183221109133","url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on Bacchi’s (2009) ‘What’s the problem represented to be?’ framework, this article provides a critical analysis of HM Government’s (2021a) New Plan for Immigration. We explore how immigration is problematised, the assumptions that underlie these problematisations, alternative ways of representing the ‘problem’ of immigration, and the possible effects of the proposed reforms. Our article demonstrates how the New Plan is increasingly hostile towards, not only ‘illegal’ migrants, but an ever-widening group of people and organisations who may be viewed as facilitating illegal entry (organised criminals, hauliers) and/or those held responsible for preventing/delaying their removal (lawyers). The government’s proposals risk creating a two-tiered system, increasing the exclusion experienced by those seeking asylum, and widening the net of those held responsible for immigration control. Ultimately, we conclude that while the sentiments behind the government’s New Plan may not be all that ‘new’, they are nevertheless significant for their continuation and intensification of existing hostile policies and practices relating to immigration in the UK. This is especially so, given a number of recent global events that could have provided an opportunity to disrupt the government’s problematisation of, and hostility towards, people seeking refuge.","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"43 1","pages":"401 - 422"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43755444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-21DOI: 10.1177/02610183221104976
E. Kiely, Rosalie Warnock
Theorisations of state violence under austerity have been criticised for their imprecision. In response, this article introduces the concept of institutional neglect: a specific modality of structural violence. We argue that institutional neglect occurs when state services deny care to eligible clients. This is a normative claim which locates an obligation to care in the body of the state. Through case studies of two local authority-run care services in the UK, we identify three banal, quotidian techniques of neglect: delay, deferral, and diversion. We emphasise that care is not necessarily an antidote to violence; instead, care and violence are increasingly entangled within state bureaucracies under austerity.
{"title":"The banality of state violence: Institutional neglect in austere local authorities","authors":"E. Kiely, Rosalie Warnock","doi":"10.1177/02610183221104976","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183221104976","url":null,"abstract":"Theorisations of state violence under austerity have been criticised for their imprecision. In response, this article introduces the concept of institutional neglect: a specific modality of structural violence. We argue that institutional neglect occurs when state services deny care to eligible clients. This is a normative claim which locates an obligation to care in the body of the state. Through case studies of two local authority-run care services in the UK, we identify three banal, quotidian techniques of neglect: delay, deferral, and diversion. We emphasise that care is not necessarily an antidote to violence; instead, care and violence are increasingly entangled within state bureaucracies under austerity.","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"43 1","pages":"316 - 336"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45070528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-21DOI: 10.1177/02610183221106923
L. Humpage, S. Bielefeld, G. Marston, Zoe Staines, M. Peterie, Philip Mendes
New Zealand recipients of the Youth Payment and Young Parent Payment, who are disproportionally Indigenous Māori and sole mothers, must participate in ‘Money Management’. This form of income management restricts spending, monitors financial transactions and requires compulsory budgeting education. Drawing on interviews with Money Management participants, Youth Service mentors and policymakers, this article argues that Money Management aims to responsibilise young people through conditional welfare, rather than improve their long-term financial capability as articulated. This becomes obvious through analysis of how Money Management ignores: 1) New Zealand financial literacy education policy developments, 2) the literature on best practice in financial literacy education and how values about money and wealth are shaped by 3) Māori world views and 4) gendered norms. The article concludes that states should take more responsibility, by increasing social security incomes and better regulating the financial, labour and housing markets, to ensure the financial capacity of their citizens.
{"title":"Responsibilising young benefit recipients: Income management and financial capability in New Zealand","authors":"L. Humpage, S. Bielefeld, G. Marston, Zoe Staines, M. Peterie, Philip Mendes","doi":"10.1177/02610183221106923","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183221106923","url":null,"abstract":"New Zealand recipients of the Youth Payment and Young Parent Payment, who are disproportionally Indigenous Māori and sole mothers, must participate in ‘Money Management’. This form of income management restricts spending, monitors financial transactions and requires compulsory budgeting education. Drawing on interviews with Money Management participants, Youth Service mentors and policymakers, this article argues that Money Management aims to responsibilise young people through conditional welfare, rather than improve their long-term financial capability as articulated. This becomes obvious through analysis of how Money Management ignores: 1) New Zealand financial literacy education policy developments, 2) the literature on best practice in financial literacy education and how values about money and wealth are shaped by 3) Māori world views and 4) gendered norms. The article concludes that states should take more responsibility, by increasing social security incomes and better regulating the financial, labour and housing markets, to ensure the financial capacity of their citizens.","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"43 1","pages":"337 - 358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46634190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-15DOI: 10.1177/02610183221101161e
S. Crossley
state (ageing, employment, climate change); two broad policy strategies (social investment/asset-based welfare; universal basic income); and three writers (Milanovic; Piketty; Gough). These are certainly all relevant for CSP readers, presented more as summaries rather than building an integrated social democratic proposition for the next welfare state. It is good to see Ian Gough’s vision of a decarbonised welfare state being advocated for social democracy, but the author is right to conclude (p. 110) that it would require ‘steep taxation of inheritance, land, and capital transfers and ... building up the state’s store of public capital’. The author is sanguine in bemoaning the likely political unfeasibility of such proposals, regrettably. Chapter 5 reviews the first year of COVID in terms of its socio-economic impact and government policies, which is useful. Oddly, perhaps the author focuses on ‘the one area in which the government ...performed relatively well’ i.e. support for businesses and individuals. There is just one paragraph on the epidemiological impact, while several pages are devoted to the fiscal and macroeconomic impact. It is not clear what social forces in the author’s view are going to shape the next welfare state, particularly on the Left. The implications of the climate crisis are certainly considered, and occasionally the decline of the trade union movement is bemoaned without going further into its impact on the past and future of the welfare state. However, there is no mention of perspectives and pressures emanating from the women’s movement or Black Lives Matter, for example. The implications for the next welfare state of the new authoritarian/libertarian populism on the political right are not considered. It would also have been useful to have had some discussion of the moral and economic arguments for reducing inequality, revisiting Wilkinson and Pickett, and of the role, extent, and design of basic services as proposed for example by Coote and Percy. Both these texts are cited but not really more than that. This book sets itself quite severe limitations of perspective and scope, which many CSP readers might find problematic, but within those constraints it offers some thoughtful and accessible discussion.
{"title":"Book Review: The Invention of the ‘Underclass’: A Study in the Politics of Knowledge by Loïc Wacquant","authors":"S. Crossley","doi":"10.1177/02610183221101161e","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183221101161e","url":null,"abstract":"state (ageing, employment, climate change); two broad policy strategies (social investment/asset-based welfare; universal basic income); and three writers (Milanovic; Piketty; Gough). These are certainly all relevant for CSP readers, presented more as summaries rather than building an integrated social democratic proposition for the next welfare state. It is good to see Ian Gough’s vision of a decarbonised welfare state being advocated for social democracy, but the author is right to conclude (p. 110) that it would require ‘steep taxation of inheritance, land, and capital transfers and ... building up the state’s store of public capital’. The author is sanguine in bemoaning the likely political unfeasibility of such proposals, regrettably. Chapter 5 reviews the first year of COVID in terms of its socio-economic impact and government policies, which is useful. Oddly, perhaps the author focuses on ‘the one area in which the government ...performed relatively well’ i.e. support for businesses and individuals. There is just one paragraph on the epidemiological impact, while several pages are devoted to the fiscal and macroeconomic impact. It is not clear what social forces in the author’s view are going to shape the next welfare state, particularly on the Left. The implications of the climate crisis are certainly considered, and occasionally the decline of the trade union movement is bemoaned without going further into its impact on the past and future of the welfare state. However, there is no mention of perspectives and pressures emanating from the women’s movement or Black Lives Matter, for example. The implications for the next welfare state of the new authoritarian/libertarian populism on the political right are not considered. It would also have been useful to have had some discussion of the moral and economic arguments for reducing inequality, revisiting Wilkinson and Pickett, and of the role, extent, and design of basic services as proposed for example by Coote and Percy. Both these texts are cited but not really more than that. This book sets itself quite severe limitations of perspective and scope, which many CSP readers might find problematic, but within those constraints it offers some thoughtful and accessible discussion.","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"42 1","pages":"560 - 562"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47406015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-15DOI: 10.1177/02610183221101161c
HANNA-KAISA Hoppania
their racism in the name of freedom of speech. Margaret Thatcher said that there is no alternative to neoliberalism, and all should hence comply with the order of things set by the rich and ruling classes, something that is very evident in Sweden today, a country that has taken to the neoliberal order and conformed to neoliberal racism. In this context, Masoud Kamali’s book really encourages me to continue critically challenging ‘the order of things’.
{"title":"Book Review: The Criminalisation of Social Policy in Neoliberal Societies by Elizabeth Kiely and Katharina Swirak","authors":"HANNA-KAISA Hoppania","doi":"10.1177/02610183221101161c","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183221101161c","url":null,"abstract":"their racism in the name of freedom of speech. Margaret Thatcher said that there is no alternative to neoliberalism, and all should hence comply with the order of things set by the rich and ruling classes, something that is very evident in Sweden today, a country that has taken to the neoliberal order and conformed to neoliberal racism. In this context, Masoud Kamali’s book really encourages me to continue critically challenging ‘the order of things’.","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"42 1","pages":"557 - 559"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48589155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-15DOI: 10.1177/02610183221101161a
C. Morley
adults? Finally, in straining to connect with accounts of the origins and forms of the welfare state, Anderson perhaps overplays the importance of sociological theory. Readers whose interest is in child labour will find the insistent theoretical framing and sociological terminology daunting. They may also be sceptical about its value. Surely it is clear without ‘pragmatist field theory’ that an ability to build alliances, to secure support by implicating local agencies in ideas and positions and to network across different elite groups was important in reformers’ success? It would be a shame if a too heavy theoretical touch deterred general readers who would gain from working through this carefully researched book, especially as its implications, spelled out in the closing chapter, provide real food for thought.
{"title":"Book Review: Dissenting Social Work: Critical Theory, Resistance and Pandemic by Paul Michael Garrett","authors":"C. Morley","doi":"10.1177/02610183221101161a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183221101161a","url":null,"abstract":"adults? Finally, in straining to connect with accounts of the origins and forms of the welfare state, Anderson perhaps overplays the importance of sociological theory. Readers whose interest is in child labour will find the insistent theoretical framing and sociological terminology daunting. They may also be sceptical about its value. Surely it is clear without ‘pragmatist field theory’ that an ability to build alliances, to secure support by implicating local agencies in ideas and positions and to network across different elite groups was important in reformers’ success? It would be a shame if a too heavy theoretical touch deterred general readers who would gain from working through this carefully researched book, especially as its implications, spelled out in the closing chapter, provide real food for thought.","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"42 1","pages":"552 - 555"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43117230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-15DOI: 10.1177/02610183221101161b
Maria Moberg Stephenson
chapter considering the emancipatory potential of a particular theorist’s contribution and how it may (or may not) help activate dissenting forms of social work. To be sure, the book is not light reading or for the faint-hearted, but it provides substantial nourishment for dissenting practitioners and educators seeking a more advanced and scholarly, rather than merely introductory, engagement with critical social theory. Overall, the underpinning critical analysis results in impeccably crafted arguments that provide strong validation of the need for dissent. To sum up, Paul Michael Garrett is a leading global scholar in critical social theory with a creative and encyclopaedic mind, and much of this is on display in this book. Once again, therefore, he has succeeded in making a profoundly valuable contribution to the global social work academy. In short, by adding to the much-needed Leftist scholarship in the discipline of social work, Dissenting Social Work furnishes an intellectual feast that brings critical social theory and social work into a deeply serious and productive conversation.
{"title":"Book Review: Neoliberal Securitisation and Symbolic Violence: Silencing Political, Academic and Social Resistance by Masoud Kamali","authors":"Maria Moberg Stephenson","doi":"10.1177/02610183221101161b","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183221101161b","url":null,"abstract":"chapter considering the emancipatory potential of a particular theorist’s contribution and how it may (or may not) help activate dissenting forms of social work. To be sure, the book is not light reading or for the faint-hearted, but it provides substantial nourishment for dissenting practitioners and educators seeking a more advanced and scholarly, rather than merely introductory, engagement with critical social theory. Overall, the underpinning critical analysis results in impeccably crafted arguments that provide strong validation of the need for dissent. To sum up, Paul Michael Garrett is a leading global scholar in critical social theory with a creative and encyclopaedic mind, and much of this is on display in this book. Once again, therefore, he has succeeded in making a profoundly valuable contribution to the global social work academy. In short, by adding to the much-needed Leftist scholarship in the discipline of social work, Dissenting Social Work furnishes an intellectual feast that brings critical social theory and social work into a deeply serious and productive conversation.","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"42 1","pages":"555 - 557"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44160608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-15DOI: 10.1177/02610183221101161d
N. Ginsburg
{"title":"Book Review: The Next Welfare State? UK Welfare After COVID-19 by Christopher Pierson","authors":"N. Ginsburg","doi":"10.1177/02610183221101161d","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183221101161d","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"42 1","pages":"559 - 560"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48478353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：