Disaster Prevention and Management最新文献

英文中文

“Respect existence or expect … resilience?” epistemic reflexivity towards liberated disaster studies "尊重存在还是期待......复原力？"认识论反身性走向解放的灾害研究

IF 1.9 4区环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Disaster Prevention and Management

Pub Date : 2024-02-05 DOI: 10.1108/dpm-06-2023-0135

Ricardo Fuentealba

Purpose

This paper proposes a way of reflexing on how we think within critical disaster studies. It focuses on the biases and unthought dimensions of two concepts – resilience and development – and reflects on the relationship between theory and practice in critical disaster studies.

Design/methodology/approach

Premised on the idea of epistemic reflexivity developed by Pierre Bourdieu, and drawing on previous research, this theoretical article analyses two conceptual biases and shortcomings of disaster studies: how resilience builds on certain agency; and how development assumes certain political imagination.

Findings

The article argues that critical disaster scholars must reflect on their own intellectual practice, including the origin of concepts and what they do. This is exemplified by a description of how the idea of resistance is intimately connected to that of resilience, and by showing that we must go beyond the capitalist realism that typically underlies development and risk creation. The theoretical advancement of our field can provide ways of thinking about the premises of many of our concepts.

Originality/value

The paper offers an invitation for disaster researchers to engage with critical thought and meta-theoretical reflexions. To think profoundly about our concepts is a necessary first step to developing critical scholarship. Epistemic reflexivity in critical disaster studies therefore provides an interesting avenue by which to liberate the field from overly technocratic approaches and develop its own criticality.

目的本文提出了一种反思我们如何在批判性灾害研究中进行思考的方法。它侧重于两个概念--抗灾能力和发展--的偏见和未思考层面，并反思批判性灾害研究中理论与实践之间的关系。本文以皮埃尔-布迪厄（Pierre Bourdieu）提出的认识论反身性（epistemic reflexivity）思想为前提，并借鉴了以往的研究，分析了灾害研究中的两个概念偏差和不足：抗灾能力如何建立在特定的机构之上；发展如何假定了特定的政治想象力。例如，文章描述了抵抗力的概念与复原力的概念是如何紧密联系在一起的，并表明我们必须超越资本主义现实主义，这种现实主义通常是发展和风险创造的基础。我们领域的理论进步可以为我们思考许多概念的前提提供方法。原创性/价值本文邀请灾害研究人员进行批判性思考和元理论反思。深刻思考我们的概念是发展批判性学术的必要第一步。因此，批判性灾害研究中的认识论反身性提供了一个有趣的途径，可将该领域从过于技术官僚的方法中解放出来，并发展其自身的批判性。

{"title":"“Respect existence or expect … resilience?” epistemic reflexivity towards liberated disaster studies","authors":"Ricardo Fuentealba","doi":"10.1108/dpm-06-2023-0135","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-06-2023-0135","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>This paper proposes a way of reflexing on how we think within critical disaster studies. It focuses on the biases and unthought dimensions of two concepts – resilience and development – and reflects on the relationship between theory and practice in critical disaster studies.</p>\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>Premised on the idea of epistemic reflexivity developed by Pierre Bourdieu, and drawing on previous research, this theoretical article analyses two conceptual biases and shortcomings of disaster studies: how resilience builds on certain agency; and how development assumes certain political imagination.</p>\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>The article argues that critical disaster scholars must reflect on their own intellectual practice, including the origin of concepts and what they do. This is exemplified by a description of how the idea of resistance is intimately connected to that of resilience, and by showing that we must go beyond the capitalist realism that typically underlies development and risk creation. The theoretical advancement of our field can provide ways of thinking about the premises of many of our concepts.</p>\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>The paper offers an invitation for disaster researchers to engage with critical thought and meta-theoretical reflexions. To think profoundly about our concepts is a necessary first step to developing critical scholarship. Epistemic reflexivity in critical disaster studies therefore provides an interesting avenue by which to liberate the field from overly technocratic approaches and develop its own criticality.</p>","PeriodicalId":47687,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Prevention and Management","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139677441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The distribution of Cyclone Idai’s water impacts in Beira, Mozambique 伊代飓风对莫桑比克贝拉水域影响的分布情况

IF 1.9 4区环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Disaster Prevention and Management

Pub Date : 2024-01-03 DOI: 10.1108/dpm-08-2023-0211

Cameron McCordic, Ines Raimundo, Matthew Judyn, Duncan Willis

Purpose

Climate hazards in the form of cyclones are projected to become more intense under the pressures of future climate change. These changes represent a growing hazard to low lying coastal cities like Beira, Mozambique. In 2019, Beira experienced the devastating impact of Cyclone Idai. One of the many impacts resulting from this Cyclone was disrupted drinking water access. This investigation explores the distribution of Cyclone Idai’s impact on drinking water access via an environmental justice lens, exploring how preexisting water access characteristics may have predisposed households to the impacts of Cyclone Idai in Beria.

Design/methodology/approach

Relying on household survey data collected in Beira, the investigation applied a decision tree algorithm to investigate how drinking water disruption was distributed across the household survey sample using these preexisting vulnerabilities.

Findings

The investigation found that households that mainly relied upon piped water sources and experienced inconsistent access to water in the year prior to Cyclone Idai were more likely to experience disrupted drinking water access immediately after Cyclone Idai. The results indicate that residents in formal areas of Beira, largely reliant upon piped water supply, experienced higher rates of disrupted drinking water access following Cyclone Idai.

Originality/value

These findings question a commonly held assumption that informal areas are more vulnerable to climate hazards, like cyclones, than formal areas of a city. The findings support the inclusion of informal settlements in the design of climate change adaptation strategies.

目的在未来气候变化的压力下，预计气旋形式的气候灾害将变得更加严重。这些变化对莫桑比克贝拉等低洼沿海城市的危害日益严重。2019 年，贝拉遭受了 "伊代 "气旋的破坏性影响。这次旋风造成的众多影响之一是饮用水供应中断。本调查从环境正义的视角探讨了 "伊代 "气旋对饮用水获取的影响分布情况，探讨了贝利亚的家庭在获取水源方面的既有特征可能如何使其容易受到 "伊代 "气旋的影响。设计/方法/途径本调查以在贝拉收集的家庭调查数据为基础，采用决策树算法，利用这些既有的脆弱性，调查饮用水中断在家庭调查样本中的分布情况。调查结果调查发现，在 "伊代 "气旋发生前一年主要依赖自来水水源且用水不稳定的家庭，更有可能在 "伊代 "气旋发生后立即出现饮用水供应中断的情况。研究结果表明，贝拉正规地区的居民主要依赖自来水供应，在 "伊代 "气旋过后，他们的饮用水供应中断率更高。原创性/价值这些研究结果对一个普遍的假设提出了质疑，即非正规地区比城市的正规地区更容易受到气旋等气候灾害的影响。研究结果支持将非正规住区纳入气候变化适应战略的设计中。

{"title":"The distribution of Cyclone Idai’s water impacts in Beira, Mozambique","authors":"Cameron McCordic, Ines Raimundo, Matthew Judyn, Duncan Willis","doi":"10.1108/dpm-08-2023-0211","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-08-2023-0211","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>Climate hazards in the form of cyclones are projected to become more intense under the pressures of future climate change. These changes represent a growing hazard to low lying coastal cities like Beira, Mozambique. In 2019, Beira experienced the devastating impact of Cyclone Idai. One of the many impacts resulting from this Cyclone was disrupted drinking water access. This investigation explores the distribution of Cyclone Idai’s impact on drinking water access via an environmental justice lens, exploring how preexisting water access characteristics may have predisposed households to the impacts of Cyclone Idai in Beria.</p>\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>Relying on household survey data collected in Beira, the investigation applied a decision tree algorithm to investigate how drinking water disruption was distributed across the household survey sample using these preexisting vulnerabilities.</p>\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>The investigation found that households that mainly relied upon piped water sources and experienced inconsistent access to water in the year prior to Cyclone Idai were more likely to experience disrupted drinking water access immediately after Cyclone Idai. The results indicate that residents in formal areas of Beira, largely reliant upon piped water supply, experienced higher rates of disrupted drinking water access following Cyclone Idai.</p>\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>These findings question a commonly held assumption that informal areas are more vulnerable to climate hazards, like cyclones, than formal areas of a city. The findings support the inclusion of informal settlements in the design of climate change adaptation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47687,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Prevention and Management","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139376368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

DRR Interview with Terry Cannon: disaster studies: why is class being ignored? DRR 专访 Terry Cannon：灾害研究：为什么课堂被忽视？

IF 1.9 4区环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Disaster Prevention and Management

Pub Date : 2024-01-02 DOI: 10.1108/dpm-10-2023-0254

Terry Cannon

Purpose

The transcript is of one from a number of interviews with disaster risk reduction (DRR) “pioneers” carried out in 2022 as a part of the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) project to record the history of the field. It aims to enable one of the “pioneers” to explain his role in the emergence of disaster studies and provide critical commentary on what he considers is wrong with current DRR approaches.

Design/methodology/approach

Terry Cannon was interviewed to explain the beginnings of his involvement in disasters research and to comment on his views on progress in the field of disaster risk reduction since his early work in the 1980s. The transcript and video were developed in the context of the UNDRR project on the history of DRR.

Findings

The interview provides an account of the origins of the book “At Risk” and why it was considered necessary. This is put into the context of how the field of DRR has emerged since the 1980s. It elicits opinions on what he considers the gaps in both his early work (especially in the book “At Risk” of which he was a co-author) and in the field of DRR recently.

Originality/value

It provides historical context on how early disaster research developed the alternative framework of “social construction” of disasters, in opposition to the idea that they are “natural”. It challenges some of the approaches that have emerged as DRR and has been institutionalised, including its increasing difficulty in supporting the ideas of social construction.

目的作为联合国减少灾害风险办公室（UNDRR）记录该领域历史项目的一部分，2022 年对减少灾害风险（DRR）"先驱 "进行了多次采访，本记录是其中的一次。采访的目的是让其中一位 "先驱 "解释他在灾害研究兴起过程中所扮演的角色，并对他认为当前的减灾方法存在的问题进行批判性评论。设计/方法/途径对特里-坎农（Terry Cannon）进行了采访，让他解释自己参与灾害研究的初衷，并对他自 20 世纪 80 年代早期工作以来在减灾领域取得的进展发表看法。访谈记录和视频是在联合国减少灾害风险十年关于减少灾害风险历史的项目背景下制作的。这是在 1980 年代以来如何出现减少灾害风险领域的背景下进行的。原创性/价值它提供了早期灾害研究如何发展灾害的 "社会建构 "替代框架的历史背景，与灾害是 "自然 "的观点相对立。它对随着减少灾害风险的出现和制度化而出现的一些方法提出了质疑，包括在支持社会建构的观点方面遇到的越来越多的困难。

{"title":"DRR Interview with Terry Cannon: disaster studies: why is class being ignored?","authors":"Terry Cannon","doi":"10.1108/dpm-10-2023-0254","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-10-2023-0254","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>The transcript is of one from a number of interviews with disaster risk reduction (DRR) “pioneers” carried out in 2022 as a part of the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) project to record the history of the field. It aims to enable one of the “pioneers” to explain his role in the emergence of disaster studies and provide critical commentary on what he considers is wrong with current DRR approaches.</p>\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>Terry Cannon was interviewed to explain the beginnings of his involvement in disasters research and to comment on his views on progress in the field of disaster risk reduction since his early work in the 1980s. The transcript and video were developed in the context of the UNDRR project on the history of DRR.</p>\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>The interview provides an account of the origins of the book “At Risk” and why it was considered necessary. This is put into the context of how the field of DRR has emerged since the 1980s. It elicits opinions on what he considers the gaps in both his early work (especially in the book “At Risk” of which he was a co-author) and in the field of DRR recently.</p>\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>It provides historical context on how early disaster research developed the alternative framework of “social construction” of disasters, in opposition to the idea that they are “natural”. It challenges some of the approaches that have emerged as DRR and has been institutionalised, including its increasing difficulty in supporting the ideas of social construction.</p>","PeriodicalId":47687,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Prevention and Management","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139070104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Disasters “Through the looking glass” 灾难 "穿越时空

IF 1.9 4区环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Disaster Prevention and Management

Pub Date : 2023-12-29 DOI: 10.1108/dpm-06-2023-0134

Jason Von Meding, Carla Brisotto, Haleh Mehdipour, Colin Lasch

Purpose

This paper will challenge normative disaster studies and practice by arguing that thriving communities require the pursuit of imperfection and solidarity. The authors use Lewis Carroll’s Looking-Glass World as a lens to critique both how disasters are understood, and how disaster researchers and practitioners operate, within a climate-change affected world where cultural, political and historical constructs are constantly shifting.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper will undertake an analysis of both disasters and disaster studies, using this unique (and satirical) critical lens, looking at the unfolding of systemic mistakes, oppressions and mal-development that are revealed in contemporary disasters, that were once the critiques of Lewis Carroll’s Victorian-era England. It shows how disaster “resilience-building” can actually be a mechanism for continuing the status quo, and how persistent colonizing institutions and systems can be in reproducing themselves.

Findings

The authors argue the liberation of disaster studies as a process of challenging the doctrines and paradigms that have been created and given meaning by those in power – particularly white, Western/Northern/Eurocentric, male power. They suggest how researchers and practitioners might view disasters – and their own praxis – Through the Looking Glass in an effort to better understand the power, domination and violence of the status quo, but also as a means of creating a vision for something better, arguing that liberation is possible through community-led action grounded in love, solidarity, difference and interconnection.

Originality/value

The paper uses a novel conceptual lens as a way to challenge researchers and practitioners to avoid the utopic trap that wishes to achieve homogenized perfection and instead find an “imperfect” and complex adaptation that moves toward justice. Considering this idea through satire and literary criticism will lend support to empirical research that makes a similar case using data.

目的本文将对规范性的灾害研究和实践提出挑战，认为繁荣的社区需要追求不完美和团结。作者以刘易斯-卡罗尔（Lewis Carroll）的 "望远镜世界"（Looking-Glass World）为视角，批判了在一个受气候变化影响、文化、政治和历史建构不断变化的世界中，人们是如何理解灾害的，灾害研究人员和从业人员又是如何开展工作的。设计/方法/途径本文将使用这一独特的（讽刺性的）批判视角，对灾害和灾害研究进行分析，审视当代灾害所揭示的系统性错误、压迫和发展弊端，而这些曾是刘易斯-卡罗尔笔下维多利亚时代英国的批判对象。研究结果作者认为，灾害研究的解放是一个挑战理论和范式的过程，这些理论和范式是由掌权者--尤其是白人、西方/北方/以欧洲为中心的男性掌权者--创造并赋予意义的。他们建议研究人员和从业人员如何通过 "望远镜 "来看待灾难--以及他们自己的实践--以更好地理解现状中的权力、统治和暴力，同时也将其作为一种创造美好愿景的手段，认为通过以爱、团结、差异和相互联系为基础的社区主导行动，解放是可能的。原创性/价值本文使用了一种新颖的概念视角，以此来挑战研究人员和从业人员，避免陷入乌托邦式的陷阱，即希望实现同质化的完美，而是找到一种 "不完美 "的、复杂的适应方式，以实现正义。通过讽刺和文学批评来思考这一观点，将为利用数据提出类似观点的实证研究提供支持。

{"title":"Disasters “Through the looking glass”","authors":"Jason Von Meding, Carla Brisotto, Haleh Mehdipour, Colin Lasch","doi":"10.1108/dpm-06-2023-0134","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-06-2023-0134","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>This paper will challenge normative disaster studies and practice by arguing that thriving communities require the pursuit of imperfection and solidarity. The authors use Lewis Carroll’s Looking-Glass World as a lens to critique both how disasters are understood, and how disaster researchers and practitioners operate, within a climate-change affected world where cultural, political and historical constructs are constantly shifting.</p>\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>The paper will undertake an analysis of both disasters and disaster studies, using this unique (and satirical) critical lens, looking at the unfolding of systemic mistakes, oppressions and mal-development that are revealed in contemporary disasters, that were once the critiques of Lewis Carroll’s Victorian-era England. It shows how disaster “resilience-building” can actually be a mechanism for continuing the status quo, and how persistent colonizing institutions and systems can be in reproducing themselves.</p>\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>The authors argue the liberation of disaster studies as a process of challenging the doctrines and paradigms that have been created and given meaning by those in power – particularly white, Western/Northern/Eurocentric, male power. They suggest how researchers and practitioners might view disasters – and their own praxis – Through the Looking Glass in an effort to better understand the power, domination and violence of the status quo, but also as a means of creating a vision for something better, arguing that liberation is possible through community-led action grounded in love, solidarity, difference and interconnection.</p>\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>The paper uses a novel conceptual lens as a way to challenge researchers and practitioners to avoid the utopic trap that wishes to achieve homogenized perfection and instead find an “imperfect” and complex adaptation that moves toward justice. Considering this idea through satire and literary criticism will lend support to empirical research that makes a similar case using data.</p>","PeriodicalId":47687,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Prevention and Management","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139057290","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The potential for community-driven ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction in South Asia: a literature review 南亚社区驱动的基于生态系统的减少灾害风险潜力：文献综述

IF 1.9 4区环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Disaster Prevention and Management

Pub Date : 2023-12-26 DOI: 10.1108/dpm-06-2023-0128

Damithri Chathumani Lansakara, Loic Le De, Michael Petterson, Deepthi Wickramasinghe

Purpose

The paper reviews existing literature on South Asian ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction (DRR) and identifies how community participation can be used to plan and implement ecosystem-based DRR approaches.

Design/methodology/approach

The literature review methodology involved several stages. Firstly, the research objective was determined. Secondly keywords for the literature search were determined. Scopus, Google Scholar, JSTOR and AUT online library were utilized for the literature search. After the search, the literature was screened. The study design, methodology, results and limitations were identified and documented. After data extraction, the literature was analyzed. The patterns, trends and inconsistencies in the literature were identified based on the research question. Later the gaps, controversies and future research needs were identified. Then, a comprehensive and structured literature review that summarizes the relevant literature, synthesizes the findings and provides a critical evaluation of the literature was documented. After writing the document, it was reviewed and edited to ensure its clarity, accuracy and coherence.

Findings

The paper identifies four different themes recurrently emerging in literature on the importance of community participation in ecosystem-based DRR in South Asia. The themes are local community participation in ecosystem-based DRR governance, knowledge production, livelihood enhancement and increased public acceptance.

Originality/value

The paper also illustrates the challenges in integrating community participation with the dominant physical scientific approaches ecosystem-based DRR and proposes a five-element framework to facilitate the integration.

目的本文回顾了有关南亚基于生态系统的减少灾害风险（DRR）的现有文献，并确定了如何利用社区参与来规划和实施基于生态系统的减少灾害风险方法。首先，确定研究目标。其次，确定文献检索的关键词。文献检索使用了 Scopus、Google Scholar、JSTOR 和 AUT 在线图书馆。搜索结束后，对文献进行了筛选。确定并记录了研究设计、方法、结果和局限性。提取数据后，对文献进行分析。根据研究问题确定了文献中的模式、趋势和不一致之处。随后，确定了差距、争议和未来的研究需求。然后，撰写了一份全面而有条理的文献综述，总结了相关文献，归纳了研究结果，并对文献进行了批判性评价。撰写完成后，对文件进行了审查和编辑，以确保其清晰度、准确性和连贯性。研究结果本文确定了四个不同的主题，这些主题在有关南亚社区参与基于生态系统的减少灾害风险的重要性的文献中反复出现。这些主题是当地社区参与基于生态系统的减少灾害风险治理、知识生产、生计改善和提高公众接受度。原创性/价值本文还说明了将社区参与与基于生态系统的减少灾害风险的主流物理科学方法相结合所面临的挑战，并提出了一个五要素框架以促进整合。

{"title":"The potential for community-driven ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction in South Asia: a literature review","authors":"Damithri Chathumani Lansakara, Loic Le De, Michael Petterson, Deepthi Wickramasinghe","doi":"10.1108/dpm-06-2023-0128","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-06-2023-0128","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>The paper reviews existing literature on South Asian ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction (DRR) and identifies how community participation can be used to plan and implement ecosystem-based DRR approaches.</p>\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>The literature review methodology involved several stages. Firstly, the research objective was determined. Secondly keywords for the literature search were determined. Scopus, Google Scholar, JSTOR and AUT online library were utilized for the literature search. After the search, the literature was screened. The study design, methodology, results and limitations were identified and documented. After data extraction, the literature was analyzed. The patterns, trends and inconsistencies in the literature were identified based on the research question. Later the gaps, controversies and future research needs were identified. Then, a comprehensive and structured literature review that summarizes the relevant literature, synthesizes the findings and provides a critical evaluation of the literature was documented. After writing the document, it was reviewed and edited to ensure its clarity, accuracy and coherence.</p>\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>The paper identifies four different themes recurrently emerging in literature on the importance of community participation in ecosystem-based DRR in South Asia. The themes are local community participation in ecosystem-based DRR governance, knowledge production, livelihood enhancement and increased public acceptance.</p>\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>The paper also illustrates the challenges in integrating community participation with the dominant physical scientific approaches ecosystem-based DRR and proposes a five-element framework to facilitate the integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":47687,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Prevention and Management","volume":"221 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139028183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Disaster risk reduction (DRR) pioneers interview with Charlotte Benson [1] 减少灾害风险（DRR）先驱夏洛特-本森访谈[1]

IF 1.9 4区环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Disaster Prevention and Management

Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI: 10.1108/dpm-10-2023-0253

Charlotte Benson

Purpose

This transcript provides a historical overview of the discussions on economics in disaster risk reduction.

Design/methodology/approach

The transcript and video was developed in the context of a United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) project on the History of DRR.

Findings

The transcript discusses how the work on the economic impacts of disasters started and evolved over time.

Originality/value

The interview highlights the importance of studying and understanding risk and risk creation in disaster risk management.

设计/方法/途径在联合国减少灾害风险办公室 (UNDRR) 有关减少灾害风险历史项目的背景下制作了该文字记录和视频。研究结果该文字记录讨论了有关灾害的经济影响的工作是如何开始并随着时间的推移而演变的。

引用次数: 0

Interview between Bruno Haghebaert and Ian Davis concerning the early days of disaster risk reduction 1970–2000 布鲁诺-哈格巴特（Bruno Haghebaert）和伊恩-戴维斯（Ian Davis）就 1970-2000 年减少灾害风险的早期工作进行的访谈

IF 1.9 4区环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Disaster Prevention and Management

Pub Date : 2023-12-20 DOI: 10.1108/dpm-10-2023-0251

Ian Davis

Purpose

The interview documents early days in the field of disaster risk reduction.

Design/methodology/approach

The transcript and video were developed in the context of a United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) project on the History of DRR.

Findings

The transcript presents important developments during the 1980s with valuable lessons about risk reduction.

Originality/value

It takes the readers on a history of the journey of DRR over three decades.

目的该访谈记录了减少灾害风险领域早期的情况。设计/方法/途径该记录和视频是在联合国减少灾害风险办公室（UNDRR）关于减少灾害风险历史的项目背景下制作的。研究结果该记录介绍了 20 世纪 80 年代的重要发展，以及关于减少风险的宝贵经验。

引用次数: 0

Assembling fire: beyond engineering solutions 组装火灾：超越工程解决方案

IF 1.9 4区环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Disaster Prevention and Management

Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI: 10.1108/dpm-05-2023-0126

Sandra Vaiciulyte, Helen Underhill, Elizabeth Reddy

Purpose

Fires have the potential to destroy, resulting in the loss of property and livelihoods, as well as injury, death and repeated trauma for those who are already vulnerable. However, fire as a hazard has been treated rigidly and un-critically, a model that has influenced how it is perceived by policy makers, first responders, engineers and academics and subsequently approaches to implementing and better understanding fire prevention, mitigation, response and recovery from the impacts of fire.

Design/methodology/approach

This article deals with fire, arguing that its case can help imagine what liberation might mean within and for disaster studies. The study argues against dogmatic, outdated, technological and solution-focused perspectives that have constrained how fire and its effects are understood and discuss what disciplinary liberation could mean for the study of fire and its integration within DRR. The study’s approach is based on the DRR Assemblage Theory, which points to fire as an issue at a societal level.

Findings

The study explores the themes of fire and liberation through contributions and insights that have emerged through the authors' professional experience in research and practice. It offers an original and timely engagement with disaster studies through the lens of fire, an increasingly pertinent phenomenon for disaster scholars and practitioners alike.

Originality/value

By drawing on the example of fire as a socio-technical-environmental phenomenon, this paper contributes a novel perspective on the intellectual and practical possibilities that can emerge from disciplinary liberation.

目的火灾有可能造成破坏，导致财产和生计损失，并造成人员伤亡，给本已脆弱的人们带来反复的创伤。然而，火灾作为一种危害一直被僵化地、不加批判地对待，这种模式影响了政策制定者、急救人员、工程师和学者对火灾的看法，进而影响了实施和更好地理解火灾预防、减灾、应对和灾后恢复的方法。本研究反对教条的、过时的、以技术和解决方案为重点的观点，这些观点限制了对火灾及其影响的理解，本研究还讨论了学科解放对火灾研究及其与减少灾害风险相结合的意义。本研究的方法基于减少灾害风险组合理论，该理论将火灾视为社会层面的问题。研究结果本研究通过作者在研究和实践中的专业经验所带来的贡献和见解，探讨了火灾和解放的主题。本文以火灾这一社会-技术-环境现象为例，对学科解放所带来的知识和实践可能性提出了新颖的观点。

{"title":"Assembling fire: beyond engineering solutions","authors":"Sandra Vaiciulyte, Helen Underhill, Elizabeth Reddy","doi":"10.1108/dpm-05-2023-0126","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-05-2023-0126","url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\u0000<p>Fires have the potential to destroy, resulting in the loss of property and livelihoods, as well as injury, death and repeated trauma for those who are already vulnerable. However, fire as a hazard has been treated rigidly and un-critically, a model that has influenced how it is perceived by policy makers, first responders, engineers and academics and subsequently approaches to implementing and better understanding fire prevention, mitigation, response and recovery from the impacts of fire.</p>\u0000<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\u0000<p>This article deals with fire, arguing that its case can help imagine what liberation might mean within and for disaster studies. The study argues against dogmatic, outdated, technological and solution-focused perspectives that have constrained how fire and its effects are understood and discuss what disciplinary liberation could mean for the study of fire and its integration within DRR. The study’s approach is based on the DRR Assemblage Theory, which points to fire as an issue at a societal level.</p>\u0000<h3>Findings</h3>\u0000<p>The study explores the themes of fire and liberation through contributions and insights that have emerged through the authors' professional experience in research and practice. It offers an original and timely engagement with disaster studies through the lens of fire, an increasingly pertinent phenomenon for disaster scholars and practitioners alike.</p>\u0000<h3>Originality/value</h3>\u0000<p>By drawing on the example of fire as a socio-technical-environmental phenomenon, this paper contributes a novel perspective on the intellectual and practical possibilities that can emerge from disciplinary liberation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47687,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Prevention and Management","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138717095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

DRR pioneers' interview [1] 减灾先锋访谈[1]

IF 1.9 4区环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Disaster Prevention and Management

Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI: 10.1108/dpm-10-2023-0250

Zenaida Delica-Willison

Purpose

The transcript talks about early days of disaster risk reduction from a community based perspective all the way from the 70s.

Design/methodology/approach

The transcript and video was developed in the context of a UNDRR project on the History of DRR.

Findings

The transcript presents learnings from past experiences using citizenry-based development-oriented disaster management.

Originality/value

Citizenry-based development-oriented disaster management is not yet fully captured in the literature.

设计/方法/途径在联合国减少灾害风险十年关于减少灾害风险历史的项目背景下制作了文字记录稿和视频。

引用次数: 0

DRR pioneers interview with Andrew Maskrey and Allan Lavell 安德鲁-马斯克里和艾伦-拉威尔的减灾先驱访谈

IF 1.9 4区环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Disaster Prevention and Management

Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI: 10.1108/dpm-10-2023-0256

Andrew Maskrey, Allan Lavell

Purpose

The interview traces the early discussions in the context of disasters as developmental failures.

Design/methodology/approach

The transcript and video was developed in the context of a United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR) project on the history of DRR.

Findings

The interview traces the development of disaster risk reduction discussions in different contexts such as “LA RED” network in Latin America.

Originality/value

The interview clearly highlights the need to not forget the early thoughts on vulnerability and disaster risk.

研究结果该访谈追溯了拉丁美洲 "LA RED "网络等不同背景下减少灾害风险讨论的发展历程。原创性/价值该访谈明确强调了不要忘记早期对脆弱性和灾害风险的思考的必要性。

引用次数: 0

首页上一页

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Disaster Prevention and Management

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀