Pub Date : 2025-10-24DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103392
Alison Buckler, Margaret Ebubedike, Jennifer Jomafuvwe Agbaire
This paper extends an empirical and ethical concern around the often under conceptualised term ‘inclusion’ in international education, to consider how research processes that generate knowledge around inclusion are, in themselves, inclusive. It presents the findings of an exploratory scoping review of 62 studies focusing on the educational inclusion/exclusion of school-age children across the world, published in international education journals between 2012 and 2021. These were reviewed using a schema for inclusive research developed from a wider body of literature (particularly disability studies), contextualised for international education. The paper provides a critical reflection of inclusion research and highlights positive examples of how research about inclusion in international education can be conceptualised, designed, carried out and communicated more inclusively. It aims to support a process of reflection about how we can engage in more inclusive ways of knowing, and the compromises involved. We conclude that inclusion in research may be ‘imperfect’, but is worth pursuing, nonetheless.
{"title":"(Imperfectly) inclusive ways of knowing: Principles and practices for researching inclusively in the field of international education and development – An exploratory scoping review","authors":"Alison Buckler, Margaret Ebubedike, Jennifer Jomafuvwe Agbaire","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103392","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103392","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper extends an empirical and ethical concern around the often under conceptualised term ‘inclusion’ in international education, to consider how research processes that generate knowledge around inclusion are, in themselves, inclusive. It presents the findings of an exploratory scoping review of 62 studies focusing on the educational inclusion/exclusion of school-age children across the world, published in international education journals between 2012 and 2021. These were reviewed using a schema for inclusive research developed from a wider body of literature (particularly disability studies), contextualised for international education. The paper provides a critical reflection of inclusion research and highlights positive examples of how research <em>about</em> inclusion in international education can be conceptualised, designed, carried out and communicated more inclusively. It aims to support a process of reflection about how we can engage in more inclusive ways of knowing, and the compromises involved. We conclude that inclusion in research may be ‘imperfect’, but is worth pursuing, nonetheless.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145365432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-24DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103432
Rozerin Yasa , Hasan Hüseyin Aksoy
This study introduces the University Autonomy and Academic Freedom Scale (UAAFS), a 32-item instrument for measuring academics’ perceptions within the centralised Turkish higher education system. Developed through an extensive literature review, expert consultation, and a pilot study, the scale was validated with 534 academics from four public universities in Ankara. The UAAFS demonstrates high reliability (Cronbach’s Alpha.93) and a clear three-factor structure: 'Autonomy in Decisions and Practices', 'Autonomy in Electing Administrators', and 'Academic Freedom'. Findings indicate a strong endorsement of autonomy and freedom in principle, but perceptions of the current reality vary significantly. Differences were observed based on university, academic title, and seniority. Notably, senior professors reported more positive views on decisional autonomy than junior staff, and Gazi University academics perceived lower levels of autonomy compared to peers at other institutions. The UAAFS proves to be a valuable diagnostic tool for policymakers to identify and address deficits in academic freedom and university autonomy, with potential applicability for other centralised higher education systems.
这项研究引入了大学自治和学术自由量表(UAAFS),这是一个包含32个项目的工具,用于衡量学者对土耳其中央高等教育体系的看法。通过广泛的文献回顾、专家咨询和试点研究,该量表得到了来自安卡拉四所公立大学的534名学者的验证。UAAFS具有高可靠性(Cronbach ' s Alpha.93)和清晰的三要素结构:“决策和实践的自主性”、“选举管理者的自主性”和“学术自由”。调查结果表明,原则上强烈支持自治和自由,但对当前现实的看法却大相径庭。根据大学、学术头衔和资历观察到差异。值得注意的是,与初级员工相比,高级教授对决策自主权的看法更为积极,而加齐大学的学者认为,与其他机构的同行相比,他们的自主权水平较低。事实证明,UAAFS是政策制定者识别和解决学术自由和大学自治缺陷的有价值的诊断工具,对其他集中式高等教育系统也有潜在的适用性。
{"title":"Assessing university autonomy and academic freedom in centralised higher education: Insights from Turkey","authors":"Rozerin Yasa , Hasan Hüseyin Aksoy","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103432","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103432","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study introduces the University Autonomy and Academic Freedom Scale (UAAFS), a 32-item instrument for measuring academics’ perceptions within the centralised Turkish higher education system. Developed through an extensive literature review, expert consultation, and a pilot study, the scale was validated with 534 academics from four public universities in Ankara. The UAAFS demonstrates high reliability (Cronbach’s Alpha.93) and a clear three-factor structure: 'Autonomy in Decisions and Practices', 'Autonomy in Electing Administrators', and 'Academic Freedom'. Findings indicate a strong endorsement of autonomy and freedom in principle, but perceptions of the current reality vary significantly. Differences were observed based on university, academic title, and seniority. Notably, senior professors reported more positive views on decisional autonomy than junior staff, and Gazi University academics perceived lower levels of autonomy compared to peers at other institutions. The UAAFS proves to be a valuable diagnostic tool for policymakers to identify and address deficits in academic freedom and university autonomy, with potential applicability for other centralised higher education systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103432"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145365433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-23DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103425
Moses Oketch , Caine Rolleston , Cesar Burga Idrogo , Mesele Araya
Estimating teachers’ relative contribution to raising learning outcomes at scale is important for informing policy on teachers and teacher development. Much of the research dedicated to assessing the contribution of teachers to their pupils’ progress in quantitative terms uses value-added modelling (VAM). Value-added modelling is typically estimated based on students’ measured learning gains over a course of a fixed period such as an academic year. Unfortunately, value-added estimates generally describe a black box of mechanisms and do not identify which specific teacher practices and/or interactions with pupils lie behind students’ progress. Therefore, it is worth asking whether and to what extent VAM can be used to understand teacher contribution to pupils’ progress, and how it can help us to inform teacher policy. In this article, we examine both questions in the context of Ethiopia. We argue that VAM offers important potential, but that it needs careful contextualization to adequately inform teacher policy. While data suited for value-added analysis are rarely available in low- and middle-income contexts, we are able to make use of such data from the Research on Improving Systems of Education (RISE) Ethiopia programme. Ethiopia is a particularly interesting case study. Important reforms to improve both equity and quality of basic education have been implemented, with a strong focus on strengthening teacher training. Nonetheless, learning outcomes have declined in recent years. Our findings provide additional evidence supporting the critics of unconditional VAM approaches.
{"title":"Understanding teachers’ contribution to learning outcomes: Implications for teachers’ policy in Ethiopia","authors":"Moses Oketch , Caine Rolleston , Cesar Burga Idrogo , Mesele Araya","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103425","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103425","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Estimating teachers’ relative contribution to raising learning outcomes at scale is important for informing policy on teachers and teacher development. Much of the research dedicated to assessing the contribution of teachers to their pupils’ progress in quantitative terms uses value-added modelling (VAM). Value-added modelling is typically estimated based on students’ measured learning gains over a course of a fixed period such as an academic year. Unfortunately, value-added estimates generally describe a black box of mechanisms and do not identify which specific teacher practices and/or interactions with pupils lie behind students’ progress. Therefore, it is worth asking whether and to what extent VAM can be used to understand teacher contribution to pupils’ progress, and how it can help us to inform teacher policy. In this article, we examine both questions in the context of Ethiopia. We argue that VAM offers important potential, but that it needs careful contextualization to adequately inform teacher policy. While data suited for value-added analysis are rarely available in low- and middle-income contexts, we are able to make use of such data from the Research on Improving Systems of Education (RISE) Ethiopia programme. Ethiopia is a particularly interesting case study. Important reforms to improve both equity and quality of basic education have been implemented, with a strong focus on strengthening teacher training. Nonetheless, learning outcomes have declined in recent years. Our findings provide additional evidence supporting the critics of unconditional VAM approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103425"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145365429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-23DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103434
Haiying Liang , Xu Mao
As generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools become increasingly embedded in higher education, understanding the factors shaping students’ attitudes toward these technologies has become critical for effective pedagogical and institutional responses. This study examines how demographic characteristics, usage patterns, perceived GAI literacy, and ethical awareness relate to Chinese undergraduates’ attitudes toward GAI in academic contexts. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 895 university students from diverse majors. Participants completed a validated GAI Attitude Scale alongside demographic and experiential measures. Descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression analyses were employed to explore how demographic, experiential, and ethical factors relate to students’ attitudes toward GAI. The findings indicate that female students perceived GAI as more useful than male students, while no significant differences were observed across grade levels. Students from non-humanities majors reported more positive attitudes than those in humanities. Regression results further showed that GAI usage frequency and ethical awareness were the strongest predictors of positive attitudes, while demographic factors such as year of study and major became non-significant once other variables were considered. The final model explained 26 % of the variance in overall attitudes. These results suggest that students’ acceptance of GAI is shaped less by demographic background than by their engagement with and ethical awareness of the technology. The study highlights the need for universities to integrate both practical training and ethical guidance into GAI-related teaching and policy.
{"title":"Students’ attitudes toward generative artificial intelligence in academic contexts: A multi-factor analysis","authors":"Haiying Liang , Xu Mao","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103434","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103434","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools become increasingly embedded in higher education, understanding the factors shaping students’ attitudes toward these technologies has become critical for effective pedagogical and institutional responses. This study examines how demographic characteristics, usage patterns, perceived GAI literacy, and ethical awareness relate to Chinese undergraduates’ attitudes toward GAI in academic contexts. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 895 university students from diverse majors. Participants completed a validated GAI Attitude Scale alongside demographic and experiential measures. Descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression analyses were employed to explore how demographic, experiential, and ethical factors relate to students’ attitudes toward GAI. The findings indicate that female students perceived GAI as more useful than male students, while no significant differences were observed across grade levels. Students from non-humanities majors reported more positive attitudes than those in humanities. Regression results further showed that GAI usage frequency and ethical awareness were the strongest predictors of positive attitudes, while demographic factors such as year of study and major became non-significant once other variables were considered. The final model explained 26 % of the variance in overall attitudes. These results suggest that students’ acceptance of GAI is shaped less by demographic background than by their engagement with and ethical awareness of the technology. The study highlights the need for universities to integrate both practical training and ethical guidance into GAI-related teaching and policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145365431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-23DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103424
Rubaiya Murshed
This paper examines whether pursuing Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) in Bangladesh leads to improved labour market outcomes compared to general education. Drawing on nationally representative data from the 2016 Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES), it employs logit models, ordinary least squares (OLS), and propensity score matching (PSM) to analyse employment status and hourly earnings across education streams, disaggregated by gender and educational level (secondary, higher secondary, and tertiary). The findings indicate that TVET is associated with higher employment probabilities for women at the lower levels of education, while TVET-educated men at the secondary level are less likely to be employed than their general-educated peers. In terms of earnings, TVET yields significantly higher wages at the secondary and higher secondary levels, particularly for women—challenging the widespread perception of TVET as a lower-value pathway. A key contribution of this paper lies in identifying a critical gap in national survey design: the HIES dataset does not capture the education level at which TVET is pursued, complicating direct comparisons. To address this, the paper introduces an assumption-based framework and conducts robustness checks (PSM) to validate results. This is the first paper to provide gender-disaggregated empirical evidence on TVET outcomes in Bangladesh using nationally representative data, offering methodological and practical insights. It contributes to the literature by highlighting structural challenges in measuring vocational pathways and informs policy by revealing the uneven and gendered returns to TVET in a Global South context.
{"title":"Is TVET more likely to lead to employment than general education? Evidence from Bangladesh","authors":"Rubaiya Murshed","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103424","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103424","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines whether pursuing Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) in Bangladesh leads to improved labour market outcomes compared to general education. Drawing on nationally representative data from the 2016 Household Income and Expenditure Survey (HIES), it employs logit models, ordinary least squares (OLS), and propensity score matching (PSM) to analyse employment status and hourly earnings across education streams, disaggregated by gender and educational level (secondary, higher secondary, and tertiary). The findings indicate that TVET is associated with higher employment probabilities for women at the lower levels of education, while TVET-educated men at the secondary level are less likely to be employed than their general-educated peers. In terms of earnings, TVET yields significantly higher wages at the secondary and higher secondary levels, particularly for women—challenging the widespread perception of TVET as a lower-value pathway. A key contribution of this paper lies in identifying a critical gap in national survey design: the HIES dataset does not capture the education level at which TVET is pursued, complicating direct comparisons. To address this, the paper introduces an assumption-based framework and conducts robustness checks (PSM) to validate results. This is the first paper to provide gender-disaggregated empirical evidence on TVET outcomes in Bangladesh using nationally representative data, offering methodological and practical insights. It contributes to the literature by highlighting structural challenges in measuring vocational pathways and informs policy by revealing the uneven and gendered returns to TVET in a Global South context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103424"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145365430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-14DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103418
Subin Sarah Yeo
Non-formal education (NFE) is often intended to ensure learning continuity in conflict-affected contexts, yet its role in long-term educational development remains contested. This study examines a NFE initiative in Côte d′Ivoire that began as a donor-driven project and was later adopted as a national strategy to reintegrate refugee and internally displaced children into formal schooling. While the initiative successfully expanded educational access in the country's northern and western regions, its integration is hindered by systemic barriers, including chronic funding gaps, overcrowded classrooms and limited policy coherence. Adopting a qualitative case study approach informed by Bush and Saltarelli’s (2000) framework, this research analyses policy documents to investigate how NFE is positioned within national education planning. The study explores whether such programs function as transitional mechanisms that foster systemic inclusion or instead reinforce parallel systems that fragment national efforts. Findings indicate that although NFE provides protective access during emergencies, its long-term institutionalization remains weak. The study challenges the assumption that NFE is inherently transitional and argues for stronger alignment with formal education structures to ensure equity and sustainability.
{"title":"Bridging or Bypassing? The paradox of non-formal education in post-conflict Côte d’Ivoire","authors":"Subin Sarah Yeo","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103418","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103418","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Non-formal education (NFE) is often intended to ensure learning continuity in conflict-affected contexts, yet its role in long-term educational development remains contested. This study examines a NFE initiative in Côte d′Ivoire that began as a donor-driven project and was later adopted as a national strategy to reintegrate refugee and internally displaced children into formal schooling. While the initiative successfully expanded educational access in the country's northern and western regions, its integration is hindered by systemic barriers, including chronic funding gaps, overcrowded classrooms and limited policy coherence. Adopting a qualitative case study approach informed by Bush and Saltarelli’s (2000) framework, this research analyses policy documents to investigate how NFE is positioned within national education planning. The study explores whether such programs function as transitional mechanisms that foster systemic inclusion or instead reinforce parallel systems that fragment national efforts. Findings indicate that although NFE provides protective access during emergencies, its long-term institutionalization remains weak. The study challenges the assumption that NFE is inherently transitional and argues for stronger alignment with formal education structures to ensure equity and sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103418"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145289752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103408
Romylyn A. Metila , TJ D’Agostino , Erina Iwasaki
Using qualitative process tracing, the study applies an adapted version of Shiffman’s framework on the generation of political priority to analyze the factors shaping the Philippines’ national Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE) policy and its political trajectory. Data sources include policy documents, legislative records, media coverage, and data from a systems-thinking workshop with national stakeholders. Findings identify several interrelated causes for the decline in political priority: persistent implementation difficulties, weak actor power, fragmented framing, leadership transitions, lack of clear proofs of concept, and the rising appeal of early English immersion as a competing policy priority. Although the policy was legally codified and internationally supported, these factors were insufficient to sustain political commitment amidst implementation challenges and a shifting political context. The study’s methodological contributions include its application of process tracing to language policy research and offers critical insights into the political dynamics that can weaken political support for an evidence-based language-in-education policy. It highlights the need for strong implementation, rigorous evaluation, and sustained coalitions to preserve promising policies and advance language equity in multilingual systems.
{"title":"Why the Philippines reversed its mother-tongue instruction policy: Tracing the erosion of political priority for first language-based education in the Philippines","authors":"Romylyn A. Metila , TJ D’Agostino , Erina Iwasaki","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103408","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103408","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using qualitative process tracing, the study applies an adapted version of Shiffman’s framework on the generation of political priority to analyze the factors shaping the Philippines’ national Mother Tongue-Based Multilingual Education (MTB-MLE) policy and its political trajectory. Data sources include policy documents, legislative records, media coverage, and data from a systems-thinking workshop with national stakeholders. Findings identify several interrelated causes for the decline in political priority: persistent implementation difficulties, weak actor power, fragmented framing, leadership transitions, lack of clear proofs of concept, and the rising appeal of early English immersion as a competing policy priority. Although the policy was legally codified and internationally supported, these factors were insufficient to sustain political commitment amidst implementation challenges and a shifting political context. The study’s methodological contributions include its application of process tracing to language policy research and offers critical insights into the political dynamics that can weaken political support for an evidence-based language-in-education policy. It highlights the need for strong implementation, rigorous evaluation, and sustained coalitions to preserve promising policies and advance language equity in multilingual systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103408"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145266568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103419
Liangjing Zeng , Liuning Yang , Tao Xiong , Tirong Yang
Chinese primary and secondary school teachers are often required to undertake various administrative tasks alongside their teaching duties. While a considerable amount of research has examined teachers’ engagement in teaching, little attention has been given to their engagement with administrative work. Drawing on work engagement theory, this qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 18 teachers from three provinces in China to explore teachers’ cognitive, behavioural, and emotional engagement in and disengagement from administrative work. The findings reveal that teachers’ engagement and disengagement are shaped by perceived job priorities, personal dispositions, and school power hierarchies. Teachers commonly move between states of engagement and disengagement, with some using disengagement as a strategy for self-protection and empowerment. The study highlights the need for clearer role definitions, enhanced professional training, and collaborative efforts among stakeholders to alleviate teachers’ administrative burden and support their professional development.
{"title":"Teachers as administrators: Teachers’ (dis)engagement in administrative work in Chinese primary and secondary schools","authors":"Liangjing Zeng , Liuning Yang , Tao Xiong , Tirong Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103419","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103419","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Chinese primary and secondary school teachers are often required to undertake various administrative tasks alongside their teaching duties. While a considerable amount of research has examined teachers’ engagement in teaching, little attention has been given to their engagement with administrative work. Drawing on work engagement theory, this qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 18 teachers from three provinces in China to explore teachers’ cognitive, behavioural, and emotional engagement in and disengagement from administrative work. The findings reveal that teachers’ engagement and disengagement are shaped by perceived job priorities, personal dispositions, and school power hierarchies. Teachers commonly move between states of engagement and disengagement, with some using disengagement as a strategy for self-protection and empowerment. The study highlights the need for clearer role definitions, enhanced professional training, and collaborative efforts among stakeholders to alleviate teachers’ administrative burden and support their professional development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103419"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145266569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103421
Yuting Wang , Xiaohang Luo , Sharon M. Ravitch , Sharnita Midgett , Ruoshui Zhao
Family–school collaboration in China’s primary schools has become increasingly institutionalized. Grounded in Scott’s institutional theory and Bourdieu’s field framework, this study investigates how institutionalization shapes parental involvement. Drawing on in-depth interviews with managers, teachers, and parents from four primary schools, the findings reveal that institutionalization significantly enhances the generalization and formalization of parental involvement, consolidating a school-dominated governance logic. However, notable disparities in parental involvement persist across regions and schools, stemming from differences in how institutional elements are combined and enacted. While institutionalization provides a baseline framework that supports “low-involvement” families to some extent, it embeds implicit cultural thresholds and normative expectations. Moreover, the process has contributed to rising parental rights consciousness, leading to increasingly negotiated and interactive institutional spaces. This study argues that institutionalization’s effectiveness depends not solely on normative consistency, but on whether institutional structures foster resonance, recognition, and cultural inclusion in everyday family-school interactions.
{"title":"The power of structure: Institutionalization and parental involvement in chinese urban primary schools","authors":"Yuting Wang , Xiaohang Luo , Sharon M. Ravitch , Sharnita Midgett , Ruoshui Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103421","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103421","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Family–school collaboration in China’s primary schools has become increasingly institutionalized. Grounded in Scott’s institutional theory and Bourdieu’s field framework, this study investigates how institutionalization shapes parental involvement. Drawing on in-depth interviews with managers, teachers, and parents from four primary schools, the findings reveal that institutionalization significantly enhances the generalization and formalization of parental involvement, consolidating a school-dominated governance logic. However, notable disparities in parental involvement persist across regions and schools, stemming from differences in how institutional elements are combined and enacted. While institutionalization provides a baseline framework that supports “low-involvement” families to some extent, it embeds implicit cultural thresholds and normative expectations. Moreover, the process has contributed to rising parental rights consciousness, leading to increasingly negotiated and interactive institutional spaces. This study argues that institutionalization’s effectiveness depends not solely on normative consistency, but on whether institutional structures foster resonance, recognition, and cultural inclusion in everyday family-school interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Development","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103421"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145266571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}