首页 > 最新文献

International Migration最新文献

英文 中文
Rhetoric and Storytelling Within the U.S. Asylum Process: Shelter RhetoricsBy Mónica Reyes, New York: Routledge, 2025. 127 pp. $53.59 (Hardback). ISBN: 978-1-03-238285-2. 《美国庇护过程中的修辞与叙事:庇护修辞》Mónica Reyes,纽约:Routledge出版社,2025。127页,53.59美元(精装本)。ISBN: 978-1-03-238285-2。
IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1111/imig.70097
Ayşegül Balta Özgen
{"title":"Rhetoric and Storytelling Within the U.S. Asylum Process: Shelter RhetoricsBy Mónica Reyes, New York: Routledge, 2025. 127 pp. $53.59 (Hardback). ISBN: 978-1-03-238285-2.","authors":"Ayşegül Balta Özgen","doi":"10.1111/imig.70097","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70097","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"63 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144934912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Multi-Level Migration System Between Regions of Origin and the European Hexagon of Attraction 原籍地区与欧洲吸引力六边形之间的多层次移民体系
IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI: 10.1111/imig.70092
Dumitru Sandu

International migration systems are, usually, addressed from the perspective of networks between migration flows that have countries of origin and destination as units of analysis. This paper proposes a complementary approach in which the units restricting migration networks are national sub-regions at origin and countries at destination. What gives specificity to such migration systems based on a kind of conditional selectivity of emigration? How can the validity of such systems be tested? The methodology we propose to answer such questions is applied to the case of emigration from Romania. Regions of origin and six countries of destination of recent migration are linked through flows that structure the analysed migration system. The analysis highlights changes between emigration flows to Italy, Spain, Germany, Great Britain, France and Austria, during the 2011–2021 intercensary period. Recent emigration flows are specified by reference to NUTS 3 regions, differentiated by urban and rural residential areas. Emigration contexts are highlighted by multiple regression analyses and factor analysis.

通常从以原籍国和目的地国为分析单位的移徙流动之间网络的角度来处理国际移徙系统。本文提出了一种互补的方法,其中限制移民网络的单位是原籍国家分区域和目的地国家。是什么赋予了这种基于移民条件选择性的移民制度特殊性?如何测试这些系统的有效性?我们提出的回答这些问题的方法适用于罗马尼亚移民的情况。原籍区域和最近移徙的六个目的地国家通过构成所分析的移徙系统的流动联系在一起。该分析强调了2011-2021年间意大利、西班牙、德国、英国、法国和奥地利的移民流量变化。最近的移民流动通过参考NUTS 3区域来指定,并按城市和农村居住区进行区分。移民背景强调多元回归分析和因素分析。
{"title":"A Multi-Level Migration System Between Regions of Origin and the European Hexagon of Attraction","authors":"Dumitru Sandu","doi":"10.1111/imig.70092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70092","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>International migration systems are, usually, addressed from the perspective of networks between migration flows that have countries of origin and destination as units of analysis. This paper proposes a complementary approach in which the units restricting migration networks are national sub-regions at origin and countries at destination. What gives specificity to such migration systems based on a kind of conditional selectivity of emigration? How can the validity of such systems be tested? The methodology we propose to answer such questions is applied to the case of emigration from Romania. Regions of origin and six countries of destination of recent migration are linked through flows that structure the analysed migration system. The analysis highlights changes between emigration flows to Italy, Spain, Germany, Great Britain, France and Austria, during the 2011–2021 intercensary period. Recent emigration flows are specified by reference to NUTS 3 regions, differentiated by urban and rural residential areas. Emigration contexts are highlighted by multiple regression analyses and factor analysis.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"63 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144934911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Sanctuary Scale: Measuring Immigrant Protections in Cities of Refuge 庇护尺度:衡量庇护城市的移民保护
IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-09-03 DOI: 10.1111/imig.70094
Benjamin Gonzalez O'Brien, Loren Collingwood, Michael Ahn Paarlberg, Jordin Tafoya

Researchers broadly define sanctuary cities as localities with policies that limit local cooperation or participation in federal immigration enforcement, but this is often a binary definition. Existing scholarship has examined the roles that sanctuary cities play in limiting cooperation in federal immigration enforcement but has tended to rely on an inconsistent definition of what constitutes a ‘sanctuary city’. Much of the existing research also analytically treats sanctuary cities the same, regardless of the individual components of a given policy. To address these shortcomings, we draw on a content analysis of 379 municipal policies passed from 1971 to 2021, coding each policy along a seven-point scale originally developed by the Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC). We draw on individual city case studies to illustrate each component of the scale and then score each locality from one to seven based on a content analysis of the policy's text. We demonstrate that policies vary in the limits they place on cooperation in federal immigration enforcement and that these limits vary geographically and temporally. We find that sanctuary policies have added new components over time, as federal immigration policies and agencies have changed, with the most comprehensive policies passed after Trump won the presidency in 2016.

研究人员将庇护城市广义地定义为政策限制地方合作或参与联邦移民执法的地方,但这通常是一个二元定义。现有的学者研究了庇护城市在限制联邦移民执法合作方面所扮演的角色,但往往依赖于对“庇护城市”构成的不一致定义。现有的许多研究也对庇护城市进行了相同的分析,而不考虑特定政策的各个组成部分。为了解决这些不足,我们对1971年至2021年通过的379项市政政策进行了内容分析,并按照移民法律资源中心(ILRC)最初制定的7分制对每项政策进行了编码。我们利用个别城市的案例研究来说明尺度的每个组成部分,然后根据对政策文本的内容分析为每个地方打1到7分。我们证明,政策对联邦移民执法合作的限制各不相同,这些限制因地域和时间而异。我们发现,随着时间的推移,随着联邦移民政策和机构的变化,庇护政策增加了新的组成部分,最全面的政策是在特朗普2016年赢得总统大选后通过的。
{"title":"The Sanctuary Scale: Measuring Immigrant Protections in Cities of Refuge","authors":"Benjamin Gonzalez O'Brien,&nbsp;Loren Collingwood,&nbsp;Michael Ahn Paarlberg,&nbsp;Jordin Tafoya","doi":"10.1111/imig.70094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70094","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Researchers broadly define sanctuary cities as localities with policies that limit local cooperation or participation in federal immigration enforcement, but this is often a binary definition. Existing scholarship has examined the roles that sanctuary cities play in limiting cooperation in federal immigration enforcement but has tended to rely on an inconsistent definition of what constitutes a ‘sanctuary city’. Much of the existing research also analytically treats sanctuary cities the same, regardless of the individual components of a given policy. To address these shortcomings, we draw on a content analysis of 379 municipal policies passed from 1971 to 2021, coding each policy along a seven-point scale originally developed by the Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC). We draw on individual city case studies to illustrate each component of the scale and then score each locality from one to seven based on a content analysis of the policy's text. We demonstrate that policies vary in the limits they place on cooperation in federal immigration enforcement and that these limits vary geographically and temporally. We find that sanctuary policies have added new components over time, as federal immigration policies and agencies have changed, with the most comprehensive policies passed after Trump won the presidency in 2016.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"63 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144929821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The European Union's Governmentality of Climate-Induced Migration: A Need for Reconceptualisation 欧盟对气候导致的移民的治理:需要重新定义
IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-08-27 DOI: 10.1111/imig.70095
Özge Bozkaya

Climate change has been irreversibly increasing its impact on human migration. This issue calls for an inclusive protection framework worldwide. In this context, one could expect the European Union (EU), a leading actor in global climate governance, to pioneer a more holistic conceptual framework for climate migration. However, the EU's rationality tends to portray a different picture in policymaking. This study conducts a content analysis of 62 selected legal and other acts between 2009 and 2024 to evaluate the EU's governmentality of climate migration. The use of climate change and migration-related concepts, both separately and interrelatedly, is analysed using MAXQDA through both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. The research theoretically benefits from Michel Foucault's governmentality perspective. It finds that the conceptualisation and human rights-based approach (HRBA) of the EU to climate-induced migration are notably limited in the documents. The EU's governmentality of climate-induced migration reveals itself as slow-moving policymaking.

气候变化正在不可逆转地增加其对人类迁徙的影响。这一问题要求在全球范围内建立一个包容性的保护框架。在这种背景下,我们可以期待全球气候治理的主要参与者欧盟(EU)为气候移民开创一个更全面的概念框架。然而,欧盟的理性倾向于在政策制定中描绘出一幅不同的图景。本研究对2009年至2024年间选定的62项法律和其他法案进行了内容分析,以评估欧盟对气候移民的治理。利用MAXQDA,通过定量和定性的方法分别分析了气候变化和移民相关概念的使用,无论是单独的还是相互关联的。本研究在理论上得益于福柯的治理观。报告发现,欧盟对气候导致的移民的概念化和基于人权的方法(HRBA)在文件中明显受到限制。欧盟对气候导致的移民的治理显示出其决策缓慢。
{"title":"The European Union's Governmentality of Climate-Induced Migration: A Need for Reconceptualisation","authors":"Özge Bozkaya","doi":"10.1111/imig.70095","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70095","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Climate change has been irreversibly increasing its impact on human migration. This issue calls for an inclusive protection framework worldwide. In this context, one could expect the European Union (EU), a leading actor in global climate governance, to pioneer a more holistic conceptual framework for climate migration. However, the EU's rationality tends to portray a different picture in policymaking. This study conducts a content analysis of 62 selected legal and other acts between 2009 and 2024 to evaluate the EU's governmentality of climate migration. The use of climate change and migration-related concepts, both separately and interrelatedly, is analysed using MAXQDA through both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. The research theoretically benefits from Michel Foucault's governmentality perspective. It finds that the conceptualisation and human rights-based approach (HRBA) of the EU to climate-induced migration are notably limited in the documents. The EU's governmentality of climate-induced migration reveals itself as slow-moving policymaking.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"63 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144905500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Through the Lens of Perception: Unpacking Subjectivity in Brazil's Refugee Status Determination 透过感知的镜头:揭开巴西难民身份决定的主体性
IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-08-27 DOI: 10.1111/imig.70093
Flavia Rodrigues de Castro

Credibility assessment is critical in refugee status determination processes both in Brazil and around the world. The unusual circumstances of asylum, often marked by a lack of documentation or material evidence, emphasise the importance of applicants' narratives. As a result, determining who qualifies as a refugee is based on validating the truthfulness of these claims. This article analyses, via qualitative research and interviews, how Brazil's decision-making framework does not eradicate subjectivity but redistributes it, culminating in a collective subjectivity that affects asylum outcomes. This study contests the notion that credibility assessment is solely a matter of technical expertise and exposes subjectivity as an intrinsic element of asylum cases, even within democratic systems.

信誉评估在巴西和世界各地的难民地位确定过程中至关重要。庇护的特殊情况往往以缺乏文件或物证为特征,这强调了申请人叙述的重要性。因此,确定谁有资格成为难民的基础是核实这些要求的真实性。本文通过定性研究和访谈,分析了巴西的决策框架如何没有根除主体性,而是重新分配它,最终导致影响庇护结果的集体主体性。这项研究对可信性评估仅仅是技术专门知识问题的观念提出了质疑,并揭示了主观性是庇护案件的内在因素,即使在民主制度内也是如此。
{"title":"Through the Lens of Perception: Unpacking Subjectivity in Brazil's Refugee Status Determination","authors":"Flavia Rodrigues de Castro","doi":"10.1111/imig.70093","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70093","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Credibility assessment is critical in refugee status determination processes both in Brazil and around the world. The unusual circumstances of asylum, often marked by a lack of documentation or material evidence, emphasise the importance of applicants' narratives. As a result, determining who qualifies as a refugee is based on validating the truthfulness of these claims. This article analyses, via qualitative research and interviews, how Brazil's decision-making framework does not eradicate subjectivity but redistributes it, culminating in a collective subjectivity that affects asylum outcomes. This study contests the notion that credibility assessment is solely a matter of technical expertise and exposes subjectivity as an intrinsic element of asylum cases, even within democratic systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"63 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imig.70093","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144905580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Between ‘Approval’ and ‘Rejection’: Non-Resident Citizens' Vote Choice in Constitutional Plebiscites 在“赞成”与“反对”之间:非居民公民在宪法公投中的投票选择
IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-08-21 DOI: 10.1111/imig.70049
Ingrid Ríos-Rivera, Sebastián Umpierrez de Reguero, Mariia Makarenko, Denisse Salazar, Rafaela Villao, Claudia Navarrete, Constanza Trujillo

This article examines how the political resocialisation of Chilean emigrants shapes their electoral preferences in constitutional plebiscites. We propose a set of hypotheses linking democracy levels in residence countries, prior electoral experience, ideology, and exposure to constitutional reforms abroad to voting behaviour. Using both administrative and individual-level data, our analysis yields three key findings. First, Chileans residing in less democratic countries than Chile are more likely to reject constitutional plebiscites. Second, while prior electoral experience and partisan ideology contribute to stable voting patterns, exposure to constitutional reforms in residence countries does not significantly shape non-residents' vote choices. Third, individual-level evidence underscores the role of democratic pluralism, prior voting participation, ideology, and socioeconomic factors in structuring electoral behaviour abroad. By situating non-resident Chilean voters within broader debates on migrant political participation, this study provides insights into how transnational experiences shape electoral engagement in origin-country politics.

本文探讨智利移民的政治再社会化如何影响他们在宪法公民投票中的选举偏好。我们提出了一组假设,将居住国的民主水平、先前的选举经验、意识形态和对国外宪法改革的接触与投票行为联系起来。通过使用行政和个人层面的数据,我们的分析得出了三个关键发现。首先,居住在民主程度不如智利的国家的智利人更有可能拒绝宪法公民投票。其次,虽然先前的选举经验和党派意识形态有助于稳定的投票模式,但居住国的宪法改革并没有显著影响非居民的投票选择。第三,个人层面的证据强调了民主多元化、事先投票参与、意识形态和社会经济因素在构建国外选举行为中的作用。通过将非居民智利选民置于关于移民政治参与的更广泛辩论中,本研究为跨国经验如何影响原籍国政治中的选举参与提供了见解。
{"title":"Between ‘Approval’ and ‘Rejection’: Non-Resident Citizens' Vote Choice in Constitutional Plebiscites","authors":"Ingrid Ríos-Rivera,&nbsp;Sebastián Umpierrez de Reguero,&nbsp;Mariia Makarenko,&nbsp;Denisse Salazar,&nbsp;Rafaela Villao,&nbsp;Claudia Navarrete,&nbsp;Constanza Trujillo","doi":"10.1111/imig.70049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70049","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This article examines how the political resocialisation of Chilean emigrants shapes their electoral preferences in constitutional plebiscites. We propose a set of hypotheses linking democracy levels in residence countries, prior electoral experience, ideology, and exposure to constitutional reforms abroad to voting behaviour. Using both administrative and individual-level data, our analysis yields three key findings. First, Chileans residing in less democratic countries than Chile are more likely to reject constitutional plebiscites. Second, while prior electoral experience and partisan ideology contribute to stable voting patterns, exposure to constitutional reforms in residence countries does not significantly shape non-residents' vote choices. Third, individual-level evidence underscores the role of democratic pluralism, prior voting participation, ideology, and socioeconomic factors in structuring electoral behaviour abroad. By situating non-resident Chilean voters within broader debates on migrant political participation, this study provides insights into how transnational experiences shape electoral engagement in origin-country politics.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"63 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144881108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Migration Impact Assessment: A Toolbox for Participatory Practices. By Stefan, Kordel & Marika, Gruber, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2024. 109 pp. €29. ISBN: 978-3-75-600447-8 (print); €0. ISBN: 978-3-74-893491-2 (ePDF). 迁移影响评估:参与性实践的工具箱。Stefan, Kordel & Marika, Gruber, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2024。109页,29欧元。ISBN: 978-3-75-600447-8(印刷);€0。ISBN: 978-3-74-893491-2 (ePDF)。
IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-08-19 DOI: 10.1111/imig.70090
Gudrun Biffl
{"title":"Migration Impact Assessment: A Toolbox for Participatory Practices. By Stefan, Kordel & Marika, Gruber, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2024. 109 pp. €29. ISBN: 978-3-75-600447-8 (print); €0. ISBN: 978-3-74-893491-2 (ePDF).","authors":"Gudrun Biffl","doi":"10.1111/imig.70090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70090","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"63 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144869852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Discourse Analysis of Syrian Refugee Learners' Reflective Accounts of Returning to Syria From Jordan 叙利亚难民学习者从约旦返回叙利亚反思叙述的语篇分析
IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-08-19 DOI: 10.1111/imig.70088
Radzuwan Ab Rashid, Omar Ali Al-Smadi, Raed Al-Ramahi, Marwan Harb Alqaryouti, Umair Munir Hashmi

This paper is part of a larger study investigating the educational experiences of Syrian refugees in Jordan. It explores the reflective accounts of 129 Syrian refugee university learners in Jordan, collected during the third week following the fall of Bashar al-Assad, a period marked by significant political transition and the voluntary return of nearly 60 000 Syrians. Using a discursive analytical approach, the research investigates how language reflects the learners' decisions about returning to Syria or remaining in Jordan. The analysis identifies key language strategies, including the use of conditional framing to express hypothetical scenarios, modal verbs to convey future intentions, affective language that positions education as both a personal and collective responsibility, concessive structures to navigate the interplay of familial support, financial constraints, and educational aspirations, temporal framing that situates actions within a specific time context, a combination of agentive verbs, intensification, presupposition, and comparative evaluation. This study contributes to understanding the relationship between language, identity, and post-conflict reconstruction in refugee contexts by highlighting the language strategies employed by Syrian refugee learners at a pivotal historical moment. It thereby advances sociolinguistic understandings of how refugee learners use language to frame return as a morally situated decision shaped by displacement, education, and political change.

本文是一项调查在约旦的叙利亚难民教育经历的大型研究的一部分。它探讨了在约旦的129名叙利亚难民大学学生的反思记录,这些记录是在巴沙尔·阿萨德倒台后的第三周收集的,这一时期标志着重大的政治过渡和近6万名叙利亚人的自愿返回。使用话语分析方法,该研究调查了语言如何反映学习者关于返回叙利亚或留在约旦的决定。分析确定了关键的语言策略,包括使用条件框架来表达假设情景,使用情态动词来传达未来意图,使用情感语言将教育定位为个人和集体的责任,使用让步结构来引导家庭支持、经济约束和教育愿望的相互作用,使用时间框架将行动置于特定的时间语境中,使用代理动词的组合,强化、预设和比较评价。本研究通过强调叙利亚难民学习者在关键历史时刻使用的语言策略,有助于理解难民背景下语言、身份和冲突后重建之间的关系。因此,它促进了社会语言学对难民学习者如何使用语言将回归视为由流离失所、教育和政治变革形成的道德情境决定的理解。
{"title":"A Discourse Analysis of Syrian Refugee Learners' Reflective Accounts of Returning to Syria From Jordan","authors":"Radzuwan Ab Rashid,&nbsp;Omar Ali Al-Smadi,&nbsp;Raed Al-Ramahi,&nbsp;Marwan Harb Alqaryouti,&nbsp;Umair Munir Hashmi","doi":"10.1111/imig.70088","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70088","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This paper is part of a larger study investigating the educational experiences of Syrian refugees in Jordan. It explores the reflective accounts of 129 Syrian refugee university learners in Jordan, collected during the third week following the fall of Bashar al-Assad, a period marked by significant political transition and the voluntary return of nearly 60 000 Syrians. Using a discursive analytical approach, the research investigates how language reflects the learners' decisions about returning to Syria or remaining in Jordan. The analysis identifies key language strategies, including the use of conditional framing to express hypothetical scenarios, modal verbs to convey future intentions, affective language that positions education as both a personal and collective responsibility, concessive structures to navigate the interplay of familial support, financial constraints, and educational aspirations, temporal framing that situates actions within a specific time context, a combination of agentive verbs, intensification, presupposition, and comparative evaluation. This study contributes to understanding the relationship between language, identity, and post-conflict reconstruction in refugee contexts by highlighting the language strategies employed by Syrian refugee learners at a pivotal historical moment. It thereby advances sociolinguistic understandings of how refugee learners use language to frame return as a morally situated decision shaped by displacement, education, and political change.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"63 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144869425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
International Cooperation on Migration Between the EU and Third Countries: Governing EU Borders in Invisible Spaces 欧盟与第三国在移民问题上的国际合作:在无形空间中治理欧盟边界
IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-08-13 DOI: 10.1111/imig.70086
Luc Leboeuf

The article addresses the consequences of the externalisation of EU border policies on the legal and institutional dynamics that govern those policies. Drawing on the analysis of legal and policy documents and interviews, which were conducted with expert public servants among EU institutions and in one EU member state (Belgium), the article argues that EU border policies are increasingly governed by ‘regimes of invisibility’—which mainly involve expert public servants who cooperate with their counterparts in informal settings and through informal agreements. The article shows how the emergence of those ‘regimes of invisibility’ is deeply connected with the mainstreaming of migration through all components of the EU foreign policy. This leads to broader use of the tools from the foreign policy toolbox, which often rely on informal forms of cooperation, as well as to greater involvement of institutional actors beyond officials within interior ministries, such as diplomats. The article further makes an initial attempt to unpack these ‘regimes of invisibility’ by showing their underlying institutional tensions and dynamics. Therefore, it discusses how public servants, with different institutional background and knowledge, conflict and cooperate in shaping EU relations with third countries in the field.

本文讨论了欧盟边境政策外部化对管理这些政策的法律和制度动态的影响。通过对欧盟机构和一个欧盟成员国(比利时)的专家公务员进行的法律和政策文件分析和访谈,本文认为,欧盟边境政策越来越多地受到“隐形制度”的制约——这主要涉及专家公务员,他们在非正式场合和通过非正式协议与同行合作。这篇文章展示了这些“隐形政权”的出现是如何通过欧盟外交政策的所有组成部分与移民主流化密切相关的。这导致更广泛地使用外交政策工具箱中的工具(这些工具通常依赖于非正式形式的合作),以及使内务部官员以外的机构行为者(如外交官)更多地参与其中。本文进一步通过展示其潜在的制度紧张和动态,初步尝试解开这些“隐形政权”。因此,它讨论了具有不同制度背景和知识的公务员如何在塑造欧盟与该领域第三国的关系方面发生冲突和合作。
{"title":"International Cooperation on Migration Between the EU and Third Countries: Governing EU Borders in Invisible Spaces","authors":"Luc Leboeuf","doi":"10.1111/imig.70086","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70086","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The article addresses the consequences of the externalisation of EU border policies on the legal and institutional dynamics that govern those policies. Drawing on the analysis of legal and policy documents and interviews, which were conducted with expert public servants among EU institutions and in one EU member state (Belgium), the article argues that EU border policies are increasingly governed by ‘regimes of invisibility’—which mainly involve expert public servants who cooperate with their counterparts in informal settings and through informal agreements. The article shows how the emergence of those ‘regimes of invisibility’ is deeply connected with the mainstreaming of migration through all components of the EU foreign policy. This leads to broader use of the tools from the foreign policy toolbox, which often rely on informal forms of cooperation, as well as to greater involvement of institutional actors beyond officials within interior ministries, such as diplomats. The article further makes an initial attempt to unpack these ‘regimes of invisibility’ by showing their underlying institutional tensions and dynamics. Therefore, it discusses how public servants, with different institutional background and knowledge, conflict and cooperate in shaping EU relations with third countries in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"63 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imig.70086","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144832780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do Resilience and Social Support Mitigate Fear of Deportation Among Latina Mothers? 恢复力和社会支持是否减轻了拉丁裔母亲对驱逐出境的恐惧?
IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Pub Date : 2025-08-11 DOI: 10.1111/imig.70080
Fatemeh Bakhshalizadeh, Clinton Gudmunson, Kimberley Greder

Previous literature on Latinx immigrants in the US mostly focuses on the negative effects of fear of deportation on this population. However, limited studies highlight coping resources that can mitigate the fear of deportation. This quantitative study, through logistic regression and conservation of resource theory, explored how resilience and social support may influence fear of deportation among 130 rural Latina immigrant mothers in a Midwestern state. Findings revealed that resilience, receiving emotional support from family members, and earned income were associated with lower fear of deportation among Latina mothers in the study. Additionally, other types of social support, such as providing instrumental support to people outside of their household and receiving emotional support from friends, were associated with higher levels of fear of deportation among the mothers.

以前关于美国拉丁裔移民的文献主要集中在担心被驱逐出境对这一人口的负面影响上。然而,有限的研究强调了可以减轻对驱逐出境恐惧的应对资源。本定量研究运用逻辑回归和资源守恒理论,探讨弹性和社会支持如何影响中西部州130名农村拉丁裔移民母亲对驱逐出境的恐惧。研究结果显示,在研究中,拉丁裔母亲的韧性、获得家庭成员的情感支持和收入与较低的驱逐恐惧有关。此外,其他类型的社会支持,如向家庭以外的人提供工具性支持和从朋友那里获得情感支持,与母亲对驱逐出境的更高程度的恐惧有关。
{"title":"Do Resilience and Social Support Mitigate Fear of Deportation Among Latina Mothers?","authors":"Fatemeh Bakhshalizadeh,&nbsp;Clinton Gudmunson,&nbsp;Kimberley Greder","doi":"10.1111/imig.70080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70080","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous literature on Latinx immigrants in the US mostly focuses on the negative effects of fear of deportation on this population. However, limited studies highlight coping resources that can mitigate the fear of deportation. This quantitative study, through logistic regression and conservation of resource theory, explored how resilience and social support may influence fear of deportation among 130 rural Latina immigrant mothers in a Midwestern state. Findings revealed that resilience, receiving emotional support from family members, and earned income were associated with lower fear of deportation among Latina mothers in the study. Additionally, other types of social support, such as providing instrumental support to people outside of their household and receiving emotional support from friends, were associated with higher levels of fear of deportation among the mothers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48011,"journal":{"name":"International Migration","volume":"63 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/imig.70080","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144811329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
International Migration
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1