首页 > 最新文献

Educational Research Review最新文献

英文 中文
Young Children’s mealtimes and eating practices in early childhood education and care: A scoping review of 30 years of research from 1990 to 2020 幼儿早期教育和护理中的用餐时间和饮食习惯:1990年至2020年30年研究的范围回顾
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100503
Annerose Willemsen, Sally Wiggins, Jakob Cromdal

Young children’s eating practices and mealtimes within early childhood education and care have attracted considerable attention over the past 30 years, with an increasing focus on nutrition and family-style meals. Research in this field is typically conducted in parallel strands that would benefit from an overview perspective and critical discussion. This article addresses that need, reviewing international research from 166 empirical papers published between January 1990 to December 2020. A scoping literature review was used to inductively identify three core areas of research: i) factors influencing children’s eating practices, ii) teacher’s and children’s perspectives on mealtimes, and iii) situated meal practices. Key trends included a focus on repeated exposure, modeling behavior, teachers’ feeding practices, rules and norms vs. playfulness, and participation in the meal as event. Future research could work across disciplinary boundaries and combine a focus on nutritional concerns with an examination of the multimodal interaction within the mealtimes.

在过去的30年里,幼儿在早期教育和护理中的饮食习惯和用餐时间引起了相当大的关注,人们越来越关注营养和家庭式膳食。这一领域的研究通常是平行进行的,这将受益于概览视角和批判性讨论。本文针对这一需求,回顾了1990年1月至2020年12月发表的166篇实证论文的国际研究。范围界定文献综述用于归纳确定三个核心研究领域:i)影响儿童饮食习惯的因素,ii)教师和儿童对用餐时间的看法,以及iii)情境用餐习惯。主要趋势包括关注重复暴露、建模行为、教师的喂养实践、规则和规范与嬉戏,以及参与用餐活动。未来的研究可以跨越学科界限,将对营养问题的关注与对用餐时间内多模式相互作用的研究相结合。
{"title":"Young Children’s mealtimes and eating practices in early childhood education and care: A scoping review of 30 years of research from 1990 to 2020","authors":"Annerose Willemsen,&nbsp;Sally Wiggins,&nbsp;Jakob Cromdal","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100503","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100503","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Young children’s eating practices and mealtimes within early childhood education and care have attracted considerable attention over the past 30 years, with an increasing focus on nutrition and family-style meals. Research in this field is typically conducted in parallel strands that would benefit from an overview perspective and critical discussion. This article addresses that need, reviewing international research from 166 empirical papers published between January 1990 to December 2020. A scoping literature review was used to inductively identify three core areas of research: i) factors influencing children’s eating practices, ii) teacher’s and children’s perspectives on mealtimes, and iii) situated meal practices. Key trends included a focus on repeated exposure, modeling behavior, teachers’ feeding practices, rules and norms vs. playfulness, and participation in the meal as event. Future research could work across disciplinary boundaries and combine a focus on nutritional concerns with an examination of the multimodal interaction within the mealtimes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50166827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
A Worthwhile Endeavor? A meta-analysis of research on formalized novice teacher induction programs 一个值得奋斗的人?形式化新手教师入职培训项目研究的荟萃分析
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100505
Jeffrey Keese , Christopher G. Thompson , Hersh C. Waxman , Karen McIntush , Megan Svajda-Hardy

This meta-analysis evaluates research literature published from 2010 to 2019 on the topics of novice teacher induction and mentoring programs. Findings included that, overall, induction and mentoring programs had statistically significant effects on teacher and student outcomes such as retention, efficacy, and achievement (Intervention studies: θˆi = 0.166, p = .036; Correlational studies: θˆc = 0.273, p < .001). Additional analyses revealed that the “comprehensiveness” of these induction programs did not significantly predict higher effects. Last, effects seen in the important Glazerman et al. (2010) study were found to be significantly lower than those observed in other similar studies.

这项荟萃分析评估了2010年至2019年发表的关于新手教师入职培训和辅导计划的研究文献。研究结果包括,总体而言,入职培训和辅导计划对教师和学生的成绩(如保留率、效能、,和成就(干预研究:θξi=0.166,p=.036;相关研究:θΓc=0.273,p<;.001)。其他分析表明,这些诱导计划的“全面性”并不能显著预测更高的效果。最后,在重要的Glazerman等人(2010)的研究中发现的影响显著低于在其他类似研究中观察到的影响。
{"title":"A Worthwhile Endeavor? A meta-analysis of research on formalized novice teacher induction programs","authors":"Jeffrey Keese ,&nbsp;Christopher G. Thompson ,&nbsp;Hersh C. Waxman ,&nbsp;Karen McIntush ,&nbsp;Megan Svajda-Hardy","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100505","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100505","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This meta-analysis evaluates research literature published from 2010 to 2019 on the topics of novice teacher induction and mentoring programs. Findings included that, overall, induction and mentoring programs had statistically significant effects on teacher and student outcomes such as retention, efficacy, and achievement (Intervention studies: <span><math><mrow><msub><mover><mi>θ</mi><mo>ˆ</mo></mover><mi>i</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> = 0.166, <em>p</em> = .036; Correlational studies: <span><math><mrow><msub><mover><mi>θ</mi><mo>ˆ</mo></mover><mi>c</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> = 0.273, <em>p</em> &lt; .001). Additional analyses revealed that the “comprehensiveness” of these induction programs did not significantly predict higher effects. Last, effects seen in the important Glazerman et al. (2010) study were found to be significantly lower than those observed in other similar studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50166825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transition to formal schooling of children with disabilities: A systematic review 残疾儿童向正规学校教育的过渡:系统综述
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100492
Daniel Then, Sanna Pohlmann-Rother

Since the adoption of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2006, the educational trajectories of children with disabilities have increasingly become the focus of public interest and the subject of empirical research. The transition to school has received special attention in this research. Yet a systematic overview of current research in this area is not available. The present article therefore offers a systematic review of the state of research on the transition to formal schooling of children with disabilities. The review is based on an understanding of educational transitions derived from ecological systems theory and a model of inclusive transition developed by the authors, which is used as a conceptual framework for the analysis. The evaluation of the studies included (N = 55) shows that various research methods are used, with interview and questionnaire surveys being the most prevalent. In terms of content, most studies focus on the subjective perspectives of parents, teachers, and external service providers involved in the transition to school. It becomes clear that the perspectives of these three groups are largely similar regarding perceived barriers and facilitators of successful transitions. Studies examining the perspectives of the children and their peers are sparse, however, as are studies that focus on the general social conditions and moderating processes in the transition. Finally, the results are discussed and perspectives for further research are derived.

自2006年《联合国残疾人权利公约》通过以来,残疾儿童的教育轨迹日益成为公众关注的焦点和实证研究的主题。在这项研究中,向学校的过渡受到了特别的关注。然而,目前还没有对这一领域的研究进行系统的概述。因此,本文系统地回顾了残疾儿童向正规学校过渡的研究现状。该综述基于对教育转型的理解,该理解源于生态系统理论和作者开发的包容性转型模型,该模型被用作分析的概念框架。对纳入的研究的评估(N=55)表明,使用了各种研究方法,其中访谈和问卷调查最为普遍。就内容而言,大多数研究都集中在家长、教师和外部服务提供者在向学校过渡过程中的主观视角上。很明显,这三个群体在成功过渡的障碍和推动者方面的观点基本相似。然而,对儿童及其同龄人观点的研究很少,关注过渡过程中的一般社会条件和调节过程的研究也很少。最后,对研究结果进行了讨论,并提出了进一步研究的前景。
{"title":"Transition to formal schooling of children with disabilities: A systematic review","authors":"Daniel Then,&nbsp;Sanna Pohlmann-Rother","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100492","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100492","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since the adoption of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2006, the educational trajectories of children with disabilities have increasingly become the focus of public interest and the subject of empirical research. The transition to school has received special attention in this research. Yet a systematic overview of current research in this area is not available. The present article therefore offers a systematic review of the state of research on the transition to formal schooling of children with disabilities. The review is based on an understanding of educational transitions derived from ecological systems theory and a model of inclusive transition developed by the authors, which is used as a conceptual framework for the analysis. The evaluation of the studies included (N = 55) shows that various research methods are used, with interview and questionnaire surveys being the most prevalent. In terms of content, most studies focus on the subjective perspectives of parents, teachers, and external service providers involved in the transition to school. It becomes clear that the perspectives of these three groups are largely similar regarding perceived barriers and facilitators of successful transitions. Studies examining the perspectives of the children and their peers are sparse, however, as are studies that focus on the general social conditions and moderating processes in the transition. Finally, the results are discussed and perspectives for further research are derived.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50166842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Building the expert teacher prototype: A metasummary of teacher expertise studies in primary and secondary education 构建专家型教师原型:中小学教师专业知识研究的元综述
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100485
Jason Anderson , Gülden Taner

While expert teachers remain a frequent focus of research in education, to date there have been very few attempts to conduct systematic reviews of this literature. This paper presents the findings of the first systematic metasummary of research on teacher expertise in K12 education (primary/elementary and secondary levels), based on analysis of 106 empirical studies from 16 countries involving 1124 teachers identified as experts. The inductively-developed coding framework was applied independently by both authors to the dataset to generate agreement counts for specific coding themes, firstly for specific domains of teacher expertise, and then stratified to compare primary and secondary studies. We present 73 specific features organised into six domains in our expert teacher prototype. Salient findings indicate that, with regard to professional practice, expert teachers reflect extensively and often critically on their practice, help their colleagues frequently, and are continuous learners throughout their careers. Concerning knowledge, we find that expert teachers have well-developed pedagogical content knowledge and knowledge about their learners. In the domain of pedagogic practice, we observe that expert teachers display flexibility in the classroom, build strong interpersonal relationships with their learners, whom they engage through their choice of activities and content, and frequently make use of strategies typically emphasised in both constructivist and learner-centred education literatures. We offer our prototype as a useful initial sketch of family resemblance among expert teachers rather than a checklist of necessary or expected features of expertise, also cautioning that the prototype remains far from complete.

虽然专家教师仍然是教育研究的经常焦点,但迄今为止,很少有人试图对这些文献进行系统的综述。本文基于对来自16个国家的106项实证研究的分析,首次对K12教育(小学/小学和中学)教师专业知识的研究进行了系统的元总结,涉及1124名被认定为专家的教师。两位作者将归纳开发的编码框架独立应用于数据集,以生成特定编码主题的一致性计数,首先是教师专业知识的特定领域,然后进行分层以比较小学和中学研究。在我们的专家教师原型中,我们呈现了73个具体特征,这些特征被组织成六个领域。显著的研究结果表明,在专业实践方面,专家教师对自己的实践进行了广泛且经常的批判性反思,经常帮助同事,并且在整个职业生涯中都是不断学习的人。在知识方面,我们发现专家教师拥有完善的教学内容知识和关于学习者的知识。在教学实践领域,我们观察到,专业教师在课堂上表现出灵活性,与学习者建立牢固的人际关系,他们通过选择活动和内容与学习者互动,并经常使用建构主义和以学习者为中心的教育文献中通常强调的策略。我们提供的原型是一个有用的专家教师家庭相似性的初步草图,而不是一个必要或预期的专业特征清单,同时也提醒我们,原型还远远不够完整。
{"title":"Building the expert teacher prototype: A metasummary of teacher expertise studies in primary and secondary education","authors":"Jason Anderson ,&nbsp;Gülden Taner","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100485","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100485","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While expert teachers remain a frequent focus of research in education, to date there have been very few attempts to conduct systematic reviews of this literature. This paper presents the findings of the first systematic metasummary of research on teacher expertise in K12 education (primary/elementary and secondary levels), based on analysis of 106 empirical studies from 16 countries involving 1124 teachers identified as experts. The inductively-developed coding framework was applied independently by both authors to the dataset to generate agreement counts for specific coding themes, firstly for specific domains of teacher expertise, and then stratified to compare primary and secondary studies. We present 73 specific features organised into six domains in our expert teacher prototype. Salient findings indicate that, with regard to professional practice, expert teachers reflect extensively and often critically on their practice, help their colleagues frequently, and are continuous learners throughout their careers. Concerning knowledge, we find that expert teachers have well-developed pedagogical content knowledge and knowledge about their learners. In the domain of pedagogic practice, we observe that expert teachers display flexibility in the classroom, build strong interpersonal relationships with their learners, whom they engage through their choice of activities and content, and frequently make use of strategies typically emphasised in both constructivist and learner-centred education literatures. We offer our prototype as a useful initial sketch of family resemblance among expert teachers rather than a checklist of necessary or expected features of expertise, also cautioning that the prototype remains far from complete.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50178895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Students coping with change in higher education: An overview 应对高等教育变革的学生:综述
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100508
Mary Jesselyn Co , Samira Hamadeh Kerbage , Georgina Willetts , Loretta Garvey , Ananya Bhattacharya , Glen Croy , Bruce Mitchell

Higher education institutions implement purposeful change to improve their performance or impose changes in response to their external environments. To deal with these changes, students are expected to develop their coping capacity – the emotional and cognitive ability to manage the demands of adverse situations. Student coping is composed of four interdependent core elements – self-efficacy, engagement, resilience and anxiety. This article synthesizes the evidence on the effect of higher education changes on student's ability to cope. Using Polanin et al.’s (2017) overview process, our search generated 551 articles, and after three rounds of screening, the remaining 12 reviews were analyzed using the narrative descriptive synthesis approach. We found that the quality assessment within the included reviews were inconsistent and, sometimes not clearly defined. From the analysis of the reviews, four key themes emerged: (1) change is complex; (2) the nature of change is varied; (3) there is an interdependent relationship between the coping elements; and (4) the measurement of change is not sophisticated. Our findings highlight the need for higher education institutions to adopt a principle-based approach to purposefully develop students' coping capacity, by improving their self-efficacy, engagement, and resilience, and reducing anxiety. Limitations and future research directions are outlined.

高等教育机构实施有目的的变革以提高绩效,或根据外部环境进行变革。为了应对这些变化,学生们需要发展他们的应对能力——管理不利情况需求的情绪和认知能力。学生应对由四个相互依存的核心要素组成——自我效能、参与、应变能力和焦虑。本文综合了高等教育改革对学生应对能力影响的证据。使用Polanin等人(2017)的综述过程,我们的搜索生成了551篇文章,经过三轮筛选,剩下的12篇评论使用叙事描述性综合方法进行了分析。我们发现,纳入的审查中的质量评估不一致,有时定义不明确。从对评论的分析来看,出现了四个关键主题:(1)变化是复杂的;(2) 变化的性质是多种多样的;(3) 应对要素之间存在着相互依存的关系;以及(4)变化的测量并不复杂。我们的研究结果强调,高等教育机构需要采取基于原则的方法,通过提高学生的自我效能、参与度和韧性,并减少焦虑,有目的地培养学生的应对能力。概述了局限性和未来的研究方向。
{"title":"Students coping with change in higher education: An overview","authors":"Mary Jesselyn Co ,&nbsp;Samira Hamadeh Kerbage ,&nbsp;Georgina Willetts ,&nbsp;Loretta Garvey ,&nbsp;Ananya Bhattacharya ,&nbsp;Glen Croy ,&nbsp;Bruce Mitchell","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100508","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100508","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Higher education institutions implement purposeful change to improve their performance or impose changes in response to their external environments. To deal with these changes, students are expected to develop their coping capacity – the emotional and cognitive ability to manage the demands of adverse situations. Student coping is composed of four interdependent core elements – self-efficacy, engagement, resilience and anxiety. This article synthesizes the evidence on the effect of higher education changes on student's ability to cope. Using Polanin et al.’s (2017) overview process, our search generated 551 articles, and after three rounds of screening, the remaining 12 reviews were analyzed using the narrative descriptive synthesis approach. We found that the quality assessment within the included reviews were inconsistent and, sometimes not clearly defined. From the analysis of the reviews, four key themes emerged: (1) change is complex; (2) the nature of change is varied; (3) there is an interdependent relationship between the coping elements; and (4) the measurement of change is not sophisticated. Our findings highlight the need for higher education institutions to adopt a principle-based approach to purposefully develop students' coping capacity, by improving their self-efficacy, engagement, and resilience, and reducing anxiety. Limitations and future research directions are outlined.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50166537","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Unpacking equity. Educational equity in secondary analyses of international large-scale assessments: A systematic review 解封股本。国际大规模评估的二次分析中的教育公平:系统综述
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100494
Lies Appels, Sven De Maeyer, Jerich Faddar , Peter Van Petegem

The discourse of educational equity has captured public imagination and become an entrenched policy value. In the attendant struggle to improve educational equity, governments draw inspiration from analyses based on data from highly standardized, international large-scale assessments. As these analyses are used as a lever for policy formulation, it is important to understand how this concept of equity is appropriated. Lacking a synthesis of how equity is conceptualized and operationalized in this body of research, the current paper seeks to fill that gap by presenting a systematic review. Our analysis incorporates an identification of operational patterns and an exploration regarding the linguistic elements for defining equity. We chart the theoretical and methodological diversity among interpretations of equity, as clustered into five major research approaches. In light of these results, benefits and limitations of the concept's complexity are discussed and implications for research are forwarded.

关于教育公平的讨论吸引了公众的想象力,并成为一种根深蒂固的政策价值观。在随之而来的改善教育公平的斗争中,各国政府从基于高度标准化的国际大规模评估数据的分析中汲取灵感。由于这些分析被用作制定政策的杠杆,因此了解公平概念是如何被利用的很重要。由于缺乏对公平在这一研究机构中如何概念化和操作化的综合,本文试图通过系统综述来填补这一空白。我们的分析包括对操作模式的识别和对定义公平的语言元素的探索。我们绘制了公平解释的理论和方法多样性图,分为五种主要的研究方法。根据这些结果,讨论了概念复杂性的好处和局限性,并提出了对研究的启示。
{"title":"Unpacking equity. Educational equity in secondary analyses of international large-scale assessments: A systematic review","authors":"Lies Appels,&nbsp;Sven De Maeyer,&nbsp;Jerich Faddar ,&nbsp;Peter Van Petegem","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100494","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100494","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The discourse of educational equity has captured public imagination and become an entrenched policy value. In the attendant struggle to improve educational equity, governments draw inspiration from analyses based on data from highly standardized, international large-scale assessments. As these analyses are used as a lever for policy formulation, it is important to understand how this concept of equity is appropriated. Lacking a synthesis of how equity is conceptualized and operationalized in this body of research, the current paper seeks to fill that gap by presenting a </span>systematic review. Our analysis incorporates an identification of operational patterns and an exploration regarding the linguistic elements for defining equity. We chart the theoretical and methodological diversity among interpretations of equity, as clustered into five major research approaches. In light of these results, benefits and limitations of the concept's complexity are discussed and implications for research are forwarded.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50167221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Beneficial outcomes and features of playgroup participation for children and adult caregivers: A systematic review of the literature 儿童和成人照顾者参与游戏小组的有益结果和特征:文献的系统回顾
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100493
Karen McLean , Susan Edwards , Timothy Katiba , Jacinta Bartlett , Michele Herrington , Maria Evangelou , Michael Henderson , Andrea Nolan , Helen Skouteris

Playgroups are a unique form of early childhood education and care provision involving children and their adult caregivers attending and participating in shared play. Playgroups are known to promote positive social and educational outcomes for children and adult caregivers (e.g., parents, carers, or kinship members), however, the playgroup research is not well summarised for confirming beneficial outcomes for children and their caregivers, alongside insight into the features of provision pertaining to playgroups in practice. To advance the field, this systematic literature review sought to identify the beneficial outcomes of playgroup participation for children and their adult caregivers and any indicated primary and secondary features of playgroup provision in practice. Forty studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings indicated several beneficial outcomes for children and adult caregivers, including amongst others, social and emotional beneficial outcomes for children and social connections and support for adult caregivers. Findings also suggested four primary and three secondary features of provision. Primary features were facilitator, play activities, safe welcoming space and routines and structure. Secondary features were service networks, materials and venue. Analysis of the reported measures used in the studies to establish beneficial outcomes for children and adult caregivers show a reliance on interviews and non-validated measures. Further research is needed using validated measures and to establish how beneficial outcomes of playgroup participation for children and adult caregivers are related to features of provision in practice.

游戏小组是儿童早期教育和护理的一种独特形式,涉及儿童及其成人看护人参加和参与共同游戏。众所周知,游戏小组可以促进儿童和成人照顾者(如父母、照顾者或亲属成员)的积极社会和教育成果,然而,游戏小组的研究并没有很好地总结,以确认儿童及其照顾者的有益结果,同时也没有深入了解游戏小组在实践中提供的特征。为了推进这一领域,本系统的文献综述试图确定游戏小组参与对儿童及其成人照顾者的有益结果,以及在实践中游戏小组提供的任何指示的主要和次要特征。40项研究符合纳入标准。研究结果表明,对儿童和成人照顾者有几个有益的结果,其中包括对儿童的社会和情感有益的结果,以及对成人照顾者的社会联系和支持。调查结果还建议提供四个主要特点和三个次要特点。主要特点是促进,游戏活动,安全的欢迎空间和惯例和结构。其次是服务网络、材料和场地。对研究中用于确定儿童和成人照顾者有益结果的报告措施的分析表明,依赖于访谈和未经验证的措施。需要进一步的研究,使用有效的措施,并确定儿童和成人照顾者参与游戏小组的有益结果如何与实践中提供的特征相关。
{"title":"Beneficial outcomes and features of playgroup participation for children and adult caregivers: A systematic review of the literature","authors":"Karen McLean ,&nbsp;Susan Edwards ,&nbsp;Timothy Katiba ,&nbsp;Jacinta Bartlett ,&nbsp;Michele Herrington ,&nbsp;Maria Evangelou ,&nbsp;Michael Henderson ,&nbsp;Andrea Nolan ,&nbsp;Helen Skouteris","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100493","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100493","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Playgroups are a unique form of early childhood education<span> and care provision involving children and their adult caregivers attending and participating in shared play. Playgroups are known to promote positive social and educational outcomes for children and adult caregivers (e.g., parents, carers, or kinship members), however, the playgroup research is not well summarised for confirming beneficial outcomes for children and their caregivers, alongside insight into the features of provision pertaining to playgroups in practice. To advance the field, this systematic literature review sought to identify the beneficial outcomes of playgroup participation for children and their adult caregivers and any indicated primary and secondary features of playgroup provision in practice. Forty studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings indicated several beneficial outcomes for children and adult caregivers, including amongst others, social and emotional beneficial outcomes for children and social connections and support for adult caregivers. Findings also suggested four primary and three secondary features of provision. Primary features were facilitator, play activities, safe welcoming space and routines and structure. Secondary features were service networks, materials and venue. Analysis of the reported measures used in the studies to establish beneficial outcomes for children and adult caregivers show a reliance on interviews and non-validated measures. Further research is needed using validated measures and to establish how beneficial outcomes of playgroup participation for children and adult caregivers are related to features of provision in practice.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50166839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A critique of the internship measurement scales in higher education 高等教育实习测量量表的批判
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100491
Şuayyip Çalış, Emrullah Tan, Sevgi D. Maç, Şule A. Turan

This article is a critical review of the internship measurement scales in higher education. Although the importance of internships is widely acknowledged in the literature, there is a scarcity of attempts to construct a scale to measure internship outcomes. In fact, a thorough examination of the internship literature reveals that there are only two internship measurement scales, which are relatively recent. It is a widespread practice that empirical studies in this area use job-related scales in their endeavour to measure internship-related constructs such as internship satisfaction and internship effectiveness. This is mostly due to the lack of available internship scales and partly due to the naive assumption that job-related scales can be somehow altered and may readily be adapted to internship-related contexts, disregarding the contextual and contractual differences between a job and an internship. This casts doubt on the validity of the findings in those studies. However, the valid measurement of internships is not only necessary to meet the highest academic standards but also to make evidence-based employability policies in higher education institutions. Therefore, this article aims to highlight the need to measure internship processes more effectively based on a sound method and bring this issue to the attention of the research community worldwide. To that end, the existing scales of internship are critically examined and areas for improvements are highlighted.

本文对高等教育实习测量量表进行了综述。尽管实习的重要性在文献中得到广泛认可,但构建衡量实习结果的量表的尝试却很少。事实上,对实习文献的深入研究表明,只有两个实习测量量表,这是相对较新的。这一领域的实证研究普遍采用与工作相关的量表来衡量实习相关的构念,如实习满意度和实习有效性。这主要是由于缺乏可用的实习量表,部分原因是由于天真的假设,即与工作相关的量表可以以某种方式改变,并且可以很容易地适应与实习相关的背景,而忽略了工作和实习之间的背景和合同差异。这使人们对那些研究结果的有效性产生了怀疑。然而,有效的实习测量不仅是达到最高学术标准的必要条件,也是高等教育机构制定循证就业政策的必要条件。因此,本文旨在强调基于一种合理的方法更有效地衡量实习过程的必要性,并将这一问题引起全世界研究界的注意。为此目的,严格审查了现有的实习比额表,并着重指出了有待改进的领域。
{"title":"A critique of the internship measurement scales in higher education","authors":"Şuayyip Çalış,&nbsp;Emrullah Tan,&nbsp;Sevgi D. Maç,&nbsp;Şule A. Turan","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100491","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100491","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article is a critical review of the internship measurement scales in higher education. Although the importance of internships is widely acknowledged in the literature, there is a scarcity of attempts to construct a scale to measure internship outcomes. In fact, a thorough examination of the internship literature reveals that there are only two internship measurement scales, which are relatively recent. It is a widespread practice that empirical studies in this area use job-related scales in their endeavour to measure internship-related constructs such as internship satisfaction and internship effectiveness. This is mostly due to the lack of available internship scales and partly due to the naive assumption that job-related scales can be somehow altered and may readily be adapted to internship-related contexts, disregarding the contextual and contractual differences between a job and an internship. This casts doubt on the validity of the findings in those studies. However, the valid measurement of internships is not only necessary to meet the highest academic standards but also to make evidence-based employability policies in higher education institutions. Therefore, this article aims to highlight the need to measure internship processes more effectively based on a sound method and bring this issue to the attention of the research community worldwide. To that end, the existing scales of internship are critically examined and areas for improvements are highlighted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50167223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Embodied learning and teaching approaches in language education: A mixed studies review 语言教育中的具身学习与教学方法:综合研究综述
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100480
Sofia Jusslin , Kaisa Korpinen , Niina Lilja , Rose Martin , Johanna Lehtinen-Schnabel , Eeva Anttila

The notion of embodied learning has gained ground in educational sciences over the last decade and has made its way to language education with researchers acknowledging language learning as an embodied process. This mixed studies review aggregates and reviews empirical research, published from 1990 to 2020, using embodied learning approaches in language education. The review focuses on embodied approaches in learning and teaching first, second, and foreign languages at various educational levels. It encompasses 41 empirical studies with a majority published between 2019 and 2020, suggesting that the research area is growing rapidly. The results show that the studies align with two strands: (1) embodied learning through orchestrating embodied language learning and teaching, and (2) embodied learning in naturally occurring language learning interactions. The review identifies various embodied learning activities and presents how they contribute to language learning and teaching in different ways. The review proposes an understanding of embodied language learning that holds potentials to engage learners holistically, while simultaneously promoting language learning skills and adding emotional and motivational benefits to language learning.

在过去的十年里,具身学习的概念在教育科学中得到了发展,并且随着研究者承认语言学习是一个具身过程,它已经进入了语言教育领域。这一混合研究回顾了1990年至2020年发表的关于语言教育中运用具身学习方法的综合研究和实证研究。本文着重讨论了在不同教育水平的第一语言、第二语言和外语学习与教学中的体现方法。它包含41项实证研究,其中大部分发表于2019年至2020年之间,表明该研究领域正在迅速发展。研究结果表明,这些研究主要集中在两个方面:(1)通过编排语言学习和教学进行的具身学习;(2)在自然发生的语言学习互动中进行的具身学习。本文指出了各种具身学习活动,并介绍了它们如何以不同的方式对语言学习和教学做出贡献。这篇综述提出了对具身语言学习的理解,它具有全面吸引学习者的潜力,同时提高语言学习技能,并为语言学习增加情感和动机方面的好处。
{"title":"Embodied learning and teaching approaches in language education: A mixed studies review","authors":"Sofia Jusslin ,&nbsp;Kaisa Korpinen ,&nbsp;Niina Lilja ,&nbsp;Rose Martin ,&nbsp;Johanna Lehtinen-Schnabel ,&nbsp;Eeva Anttila","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100480","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100480","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The notion of embodied learning has gained ground in educational sciences over the last decade and has made its way to language education with researchers acknowledging language learning as an embodied process. This mixed studies review aggregates and reviews empirical research, published from 1990 to 2020, using embodied learning approaches in language education. The review focuses on embodied approaches in learning and teaching first, second, and foreign languages at various educational levels. It encompasses 41 empirical studies with a majority published between 2019 and 2020, suggesting that the research area is growing rapidly. The results show that the studies align with two strands: (1) embodied learning through orchestrating embodied language learning and teaching, and (2) embodied learning in naturally occurring language learning interactions. The review identifies various embodied learning activities and presents how they contribute to language learning and teaching in different ways. The review proposes an understanding of <em>embodied language learning</em> that holds potentials to engage learners holistically, while simultaneously promoting language learning skills and adding emotional and motivational benefits to language learning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X22000495/pdfft?md5=bf936c890339dd99fa5a502146ed67d4&pid=1-s2.0-S1747938X22000495-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50167428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Fifty years of parental involvement and achievement research: A second-order meta-analysis 五十年的父母参与与成就研究:二阶元分析
IF 11.7 1区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100463
Sungwon Kim

The main goal of this study is to synthesize the results of past meta-analyses including studies published over the past 50 years examining the relation between parental involvement and student academic achievement for school-age children (grades K-12) in naturally occurring and intervention studies. Based on a total of 23 meta-analyses examining the relation between parental involvement and achievement encompassing 1,177 primary studies, we conclude that there is a positive association between parental involvement and achievement. The random effects’ mean effect size was 0.18 for observational studies and 0.16 for intervention studies. We note that both naturally occurring and intervention PI studies found null effects for homework involvement. As for type of involvement, our results were consistent with Wilder (2014), pointing to the strongest effect for parent expectations and aspirations and mixed results for homework help.

本研究的主要目的是综合过去荟萃分析的结果,包括过去50年发表的研究,这些研究在自然发生和干预研究中检验了学龄儿童(K-12年级)父母参与与学生学业成绩之间的关系。基于对父母参与与成就之间关系的23项荟萃分析,包括1177项初步研究,我们得出结论,父母参与与成就之间存在正相关关系。观察性研究的随机效应平均效应大小为0.18,干预研究的随机效应大小为0.16。我们注意到,自然发生和干预PI研究都发现家庭作业参与无效。至于参与类型,我们的结果与Wilder(2014)一致,指出父母期望和愿望的影响最大,家庭作业帮助的结果好坏参半。
{"title":"Fifty years of parental involvement and achievement research: A second-order meta-analysis","authors":"Sungwon Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100463","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100463","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The main goal of this study is to synthesize the results of past meta-analyses including studies published over the past 50 years examining the relation between parental involvement and student academic achievement for school-age children (grades K-12) in naturally occurring </span><em>and</em><span> intervention studies. Based on a total of 23 meta-analyses examining the relation between parental involvement and achievement encompassing 1,177 primary studies, we conclude that there is a positive association between parental involvement and achievement. The random effects’ mean effect size was 0.18 for observational studies and 0.16 for intervention studies. We note that both naturally occurring and intervention PI studies found null effects for homework involvement. As for type of involvement, our results were consistent with Wilder (2014), pointing to the strongest effect for parent expectations and aspirations and mixed results for homework help.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.7,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80822764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
期刊
Educational Research Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1