Pub Date : 2023-11-22DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2277042
Jasmine Tan, Caroline Di Bernardi Luft, Joydeep Bhattacharya
Flow is a state of optimal or peak experience, commonly associated with expert and creative performance. Musicians often experience flow during playing, yet the neural mechanisms underlying this el...
{"title":"The After-Glow of Flow: Neural Correlates of Flow in Musicians","authors":"Jasmine Tan, Caroline Di Bernardi Luft, Joydeep Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2277042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2277042","url":null,"abstract":"Flow is a state of optimal or peak experience, commonly associated with expert and creative performance. Musicians often experience flow during playing, yet the neural mechanisms underlying this el...","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"17 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138509163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-19DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2275981
Shuoqi Xiang, Yadan Li, Richard J. Daker, Yangping Li, Xipei Guo, Weina Lei, Wenbo Deng, Weiping Hu
While creativity anxiety has been found to have negative relationships with various creative outcomes, whether creativity anxiety would also negatively influence creative cognitive styles (i.e. ide...
虽然创造性焦虑已被发现与各种创造性结果呈负相关,但创造性焦虑是否也会对创造性认知风格(即思想…
{"title":"Linking Creativity Anxiety to Two Creative Cognitive Styles Through Creative Self-Efficacy and Novelty Seeking","authors":"Shuoqi Xiang, Yadan Li, Richard J. Daker, Yangping Li, Xipei Guo, Weina Lei, Wenbo Deng, Weiping Hu","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2275981","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2275981","url":null,"abstract":"While creativity anxiety has been found to have negative relationships with various creative outcomes, whether creativity anxiety would also negatively influence creative cognitive styles (i.e. ide...","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2023-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138509169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-17DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2254573
Adam E. Green, Roger E. Beaty, Yoed N. Kenett, James C. Kaufman
The “standard” definition of creativity as novel and useful describes creative products, but creativity is constituted by processes. This misalignment contributes to the oft-noted challenges of ope...
{"title":"The Process Definition of Creativity","authors":"Adam E. Green, Roger E. Beaty, Yoed N. Kenett, James C. Kaufman","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2254573","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2254573","url":null,"abstract":"The “standard” definition of creativity as novel and useful describes creative products, but creativity is constituted by processes. This misalignment contributes to the oft-noted challenges of ope...","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"18 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138509162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-07DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2272104
Kerstin Schoch, Thomas Ostermann
ABSTRACTThe RizbA scale combines psychometrics and art theory and enables a measurement of pictorial expression. This study explores its factor structure and a potential gap between theory and empirics. A sample of 275 pictorial works by artists and nonprofessionals was rated by 179 art experts. Three CFA path models were specified: models A and B based on the empirical results of previous studies, C on the theory of the initial study. Model C was additionally tested on a combined dataset. A and B did not converge, C was associated with fit indices as follows: RSMEA = .122, CFI = .712, TLI = .679, SRMR = .135, for the combined dataset: RSMEA = .086, CFI = .740, TLI = .696, SRMR = .084. Only model C partly suggests an acceptable fit. The results speak to a methodological gap between empirics and theory, that might be solved by a postdisciplinary measurement model.KEYWORDS: art theoryconfirmatory factor analysisformal picture analysispictorial expressionvisual art AcknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully acknowledge Thomas Gengenbach for providing theoretical and practical support regarding IT. Thanks also to Rebecca Kahn for the feedback on the manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethics approvalThe authors received a positive vote of the Ethics Committee for Creative Arts Therapies at the Nürtingen-Geislingen University, Germany (Reference number 19C27J101W).Abbreviations API=Application programming interfaceCFA=Confirmatory factor analysisCFI=Comparative fit indexdf=Degrees of freedomMLE=Maximum likelihood estimateMLR=Robust maximum likelihood estimatorPAFA=Principal axis factor analysisPCA=Principal component analysisPHP=PHP: Hypertext PreprocessorRizbA=(Rating instrument for two-dimensional pictorial works) Ratinginstrument für zweidimensionale bildnerische ArbeitenRMSEA=Root mean square error of approximationSRMR=Standardized root-mean-square residualTLI=Tucker-Lewis Index
{"title":"Empirics vs. art theory: Exploring a factor structure of pictorial expression based on contemporary artworks","authors":"Kerstin Schoch, Thomas Ostermann","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2272104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2272104","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe RizbA scale combines psychometrics and art theory and enables a measurement of pictorial expression. This study explores its factor structure and a potential gap between theory and empirics. A sample of 275 pictorial works by artists and nonprofessionals was rated by 179 art experts. Three CFA path models were specified: models A and B based on the empirical results of previous studies, C on the theory of the initial study. Model C was additionally tested on a combined dataset. A and B did not converge, C was associated with fit indices as follows: RSMEA = .122, CFI = .712, TLI = .679, SRMR = .135, for the combined dataset: RSMEA = .086, CFI = .740, TLI = .696, SRMR = .084. Only model C partly suggests an acceptable fit. The results speak to a methodological gap between empirics and theory, that might be solved by a postdisciplinary measurement model.KEYWORDS: art theoryconfirmatory factor analysisformal picture analysispictorial expressionvisual art AcknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully acknowledge Thomas Gengenbach for providing theoretical and practical support regarding IT. Thanks also to Rebecca Kahn for the feedback on the manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethics approvalThe authors received a positive vote of the Ethics Committee for Creative Arts Therapies at the Nürtingen-Geislingen University, Germany (Reference number 19C27J101W).Abbreviations API=Application programming interfaceCFA=Confirmatory factor analysisCFI=Comparative fit indexdf=Degrees of freedomMLE=Maximum likelihood estimateMLR=Robust maximum likelihood estimatorPAFA=Principal axis factor analysisPCA=Principal component analysisPHP=PHP: Hypertext PreprocessorRizbA=(Rating instrument for two-dimensional pictorial works) Ratinginstrument für zweidimensionale bildnerische ArbeitenRMSEA=Root mean square error of approximationSRMR=Standardized root-mean-square residualTLI=Tucker-Lewis Index","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"224 23","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135475815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-07DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2272105
E. Lydia Wu-Chung, Anthony K. Brandt, Melia E. Bonomo, Bryan T. Denny, Christof Karmonik, J. Todd Frazier, Karl Blench, Christopher P. Fagundes
ABSTRACTMaintaining healthy cognitive functioning and delaying cognitive decline in cognitively intact and cognitively impaired adults are major research initiatives for addressing dementia disease burden. Music interventions are promising, non-pharmaceutical treatment options for preserving cognitive function and psychological health in older adults with varying levels of cognitive function. While passive, music interventions have attracted considerable attention in the abnormal cognitive aging literature, active, music interventions such as music creativity are less well-studied. Among 58 older adults with different levels of cognitive function (cognitively healthy to mild cognitive impairment), we examined the feasibility and acceptability of Project CHROMA, a Stage 1 clinical trial developed to assess the effects of a novel, music creativity curriculum on various health outcomes. Music intervention participation (93%), overall study retention (78%), and intervention satisfaction (100%) rates were comparable to other similarly designed clinical trials. Exploratory analyses using mixed-level modeling tested the efficacy of the intervention on cognitive and psychological outcomes. Compared to those in the control condition, participants in the music condition showed some improvements in cognitive functioning and socioemotional well-being. Findings suggest that a 6-week music creativity clinical trial with several multi-modal health assessments can be feasibly implemented within a sample of varying cognitive ability.KEYWORDS: creativitymusicmild cognitive impairmentcognitionclinical trialquality of life AcknowledgmentsThe authors want to thank study coordinators - Kristi English, Yoully Kang, Vincent Lai, and Russell Ku - for their diligence in managing the project amidst changing public health circumstances.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2272105Additional informationFundingThis work was funded by the National Endowment for the Arts (1855491-38-C-19, 1892183-38-21) and the Center for Performing Arts Houston Methodist Hospital. Authors are also funded by the National Institute on Aging (Fagundes: 1R01AG062690, 1R01AG062690-02S1, 1R21AG061597-01A1; Wu-Chung: 1F31AG074648) and National Library of Medicine (Bonomo: T15LM007093).
{"title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of a Group Music Creativity Intervention for Adults with Varying Cognitive Function","authors":"E. Lydia Wu-Chung, Anthony K. Brandt, Melia E. Bonomo, Bryan T. Denny, Christof Karmonik, J. Todd Frazier, Karl Blench, Christopher P. Fagundes","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2272105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2272105","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTMaintaining healthy cognitive functioning and delaying cognitive decline in cognitively intact and cognitively impaired adults are major research initiatives for addressing dementia disease burden. Music interventions are promising, non-pharmaceutical treatment options for preserving cognitive function and psychological health in older adults with varying levels of cognitive function. While passive, music interventions have attracted considerable attention in the abnormal cognitive aging literature, active, music interventions such as music creativity are less well-studied. Among 58 older adults with different levels of cognitive function (cognitively healthy to mild cognitive impairment), we examined the feasibility and acceptability of Project CHROMA, a Stage 1 clinical trial developed to assess the effects of a novel, music creativity curriculum on various health outcomes. Music intervention participation (93%), overall study retention (78%), and intervention satisfaction (100%) rates were comparable to other similarly designed clinical trials. Exploratory analyses using mixed-level modeling tested the efficacy of the intervention on cognitive and psychological outcomes. Compared to those in the control condition, participants in the music condition showed some improvements in cognitive functioning and socioemotional well-being. Findings suggest that a 6-week music creativity clinical trial with several multi-modal health assessments can be feasibly implemented within a sample of varying cognitive ability.KEYWORDS: creativitymusicmild cognitive impairmentcognitionclinical trialquality of life AcknowledgmentsThe authors want to thank study coordinators - Kristi English, Yoully Kang, Vincent Lai, and Russell Ku - for their diligence in managing the project amidst changing public health circumstances.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2272105Additional informationFundingThis work was funded by the National Endowment for the Arts (1855491-38-C-19, 1892183-38-21) and the Center for Performing Arts Houston Methodist Hospital. Authors are also funded by the National Institute on Aging (Fagundes: 1R01AG062690, 1R01AG062690-02S1, 1R21AG061597-01A1; Wu-Chung: 1F31AG074648) and National Library of Medicine (Bonomo: T15LM007093).","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"224 16","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135475627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-07DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2269339
Eva Specker
In this invited paper, my aim is to introduce the reader to my body of work by outlining where I think empirical aesthetics, and specifically the study of art, is moving or should be moving toward. I will introduce two main foci of my work: 1) studying art/aesthetics outside of the laboratory and in their “natural habitat,” i.e. doing ecologically valid studies (most commonly in the museum), and 2) methodological aspects of studying art/aesthetic experience in a broad sense: including theory, measurement, and analysis. As future directions, I see a shift toward investigating potential outcomes, as well as ensuring a stronger connection between theory and methodology by incorporating interdisciplinary approaches as well as using more advanced statistical modeling. My aim is to show not just what I have done in the past, but also how this shaped the work that I am currently doing as well as the direction that I see my work developing in and that I believe should be pursued, not just by me but by many others. I chose this format in order to be able to show how I think my work contributes to these developments and can, hopefully, also keep contributing in the future.
{"title":"A Personal Perspective on Psychology of Aesthetics and the Arts: Ecologically Valid, Interdisciplinary, and Diverse Methodologies","authors":"Eva Specker","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2269339","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2269339","url":null,"abstract":"In this invited paper, my aim is to introduce the reader to my body of work by outlining where I think empirical aesthetics, and specifically the study of art, is moving or should be moving toward. I will introduce two main foci of my work: 1) studying art/aesthetics outside of the laboratory and in their “natural habitat,” i.e. doing ecologically valid studies (most commonly in the museum), and 2) methodological aspects of studying art/aesthetic experience in a broad sense: including theory, measurement, and analysis. As future directions, I see a shift toward investigating potential outcomes, as well as ensuring a stronger connection between theory and methodology by incorporating interdisciplinary approaches as well as using more advanced statistical modeling. My aim is to show not just what I have done in the past, but also how this shaped the work that I am currently doing as well as the direction that I see my work developing in and that I believe should be pursued, not just by me but by many others. I chose this format in order to be able to show how I think my work contributes to these developments and can, hopefully, also keep contributing in the future.","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"272 10‐34","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135474824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-30DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2269356
Preston P. Thakral, Connor C. Starkey, Aleea L. Devitt, Daniel L. Schacter
{"title":"Are False Memory and Creative Thinking Mediated by Common Neural Substrates? An fMRI Meta-Analysis","authors":"Preston P. Thakral, Connor C. Starkey, Aleea L. Devitt, Daniel L. Schacter","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2269356","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2269356","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"4 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136102979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-30DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2271749
Selcuk Acar
{"title":"Creativity Assessment, Research, and Practice in the Age of Artificial Intelligence","authors":"Selcuk Acar","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2271749","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2271749","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"140 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136102809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-10DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2257977
Mark A. Runco
ABSTRACTRecent developments in AI compel an update of the “standard definition of creativity.” This short article cites various proposed additions to the standard definition, which point to Surprise, Value, Authenticity, and Intentionality. The latter two are the most useful when distinguishing human from artificial (machine) creativity. Artificial creativity can be contrasted with pseudo-creativity as well as human creativity. Artificial creativity may be the best way to describe the output from AI. Even when that output is original and effective, it lacks the authenticity and intentionality that is apparent in human creativity. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. As of June 2023.
{"title":"Updating the Standard Definition of Creativity to Account for the Artificial Creativity of AI","authors":"Mark A. Runco","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2257977","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2257977","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTRecent developments in AI compel an update of the “standard definition of creativity.” This short article cites various proposed additions to the standard definition, which point to Surprise, Value, Authenticity, and Intentionality. The latter two are the most useful when distinguishing human from artificial (machine) creativity. Artificial creativity can be contrasted with pseudo-creativity as well as human creativity. Artificial creativity may be the best way to describe the output from AI. Even when that output is original and effective, it lacks the authenticity and intentionality that is apparent in human creativity. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. As of June 2023.","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136254306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-09-26DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2253403
Kim van Broekhoven
Worldwide, student-centered pedagogies have emerged in education to develop creativity. However, these pedagogies do not automatically enhance students’ creativity, because students tend to underestimate and reject creative ideas – even when highly novel ideas are required to solve the problem at hand. Understanding how students evaluate and select ideas is crucial for enhancing creativity. Therefore, this paper reviews research on idea evaluation and idea selection among students. This paper suggests that the evaluation of ideas depends both on specific and general components, and a mild state of affect and openness to experience seems to play a significant role. To improve idea evaluation and idea selection, students should be exposed to a variety of ideas and effective instructional strategies benefit students as well. Teachers should explicitly instruct students to select creative ideas and encourage them to simultaneously generate and refine ideas. However, instructing students to transform their creative ideas into tangible products may unintentionally influence their choices for creative ideas. Balancing novelty and usefulness pose challenges for students during evaluation and selection, and teachers should attune to students’ reactions as much as possible (e.g. accommodating emotional outbursts). Finally, several future trends and important research questions are highlighted.
{"title":"The Evaluation and Selection of Creative Ideas in Educational Settings: Current Knowledge and Future Directions","authors":"Kim van Broekhoven","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2253403","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2253403","url":null,"abstract":"Worldwide, student-centered pedagogies have emerged in education to develop creativity. However, these pedagogies do not automatically enhance students’ creativity, because students tend to underestimate and reject creative ideas – even when highly novel ideas are required to solve the problem at hand. Understanding how students evaluate and select ideas is crucial for enhancing creativity. Therefore, this paper reviews research on idea evaluation and idea selection among students. This paper suggests that the evaluation of ideas depends both on specific and general components, and a mild state of affect and openness to experience seems to play a significant role. To improve idea evaluation and idea selection, students should be exposed to a variety of ideas and effective instructional strategies benefit students as well. Teachers should explicitly instruct students to select creative ideas and encourage them to simultaneously generate and refine ideas. However, instructing students to transform their creative ideas into tangible products may unintentionally influence their choices for creative ideas. Balancing novelty and usefulness pose challenges for students during evaluation and selection, and teachers should attune to students’ reactions as much as possible (e.g. accommodating emotional outbursts). Finally, several future trends and important research questions are highlighted.","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134958113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}