首页 > 最新文献

Creativity Research Journal最新文献

英文 中文
The After-Glow of Flow: Neural Correlates of Flow in Musicians 心流的余辉:音乐家心流的神经关联
IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2023-11-22 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2277042
Jasmine Tan, Caroline Di Bernardi Luft, Joydeep Bhattacharya
Flow is a state of optimal or peak experience, commonly associated with expert and creative performance. Musicians often experience flow during playing, yet the neural mechanisms underlying this el...
心流是一种最佳或高峰体验的状态,通常与专业和创造性的表现有关。音乐家经常会在演奏过程中体验到心流,然而这种感觉背后的神经机制……
{"title":"The After-Glow of Flow: Neural Correlates of Flow in Musicians","authors":"Jasmine Tan, Caroline Di Bernardi Luft, Joydeep Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2277042","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2277042","url":null,"abstract":"Flow is a state of optimal or peak experience, commonly associated with expert and creative performance. Musicians often experience flow during playing, yet the neural mechanisms underlying this el...","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"17 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138509163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Linking Creativity Anxiety to Two Creative Cognitive Styles Through Creative Self-Efficacy and Novelty Seeking 从创造性自我效能感和新颖性探索将创造性焦虑与两种创造性认知风格联系起来
IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2023-11-19 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2275981
Shuoqi Xiang, Yadan Li, Richard J. Daker, Yangping Li, Xipei Guo, Weina Lei, Wenbo Deng, Weiping Hu
While creativity anxiety has been found to have negative relationships with various creative outcomes, whether creativity anxiety would also negatively influence creative cognitive styles (i.e. ide...
虽然创造性焦虑已被发现与各种创造性结果呈负相关,但创造性焦虑是否也会对创造性认知风格(即思想…
{"title":"Linking Creativity Anxiety to Two Creative Cognitive Styles Through Creative Self-Efficacy and Novelty Seeking","authors":"Shuoqi Xiang, Yadan Li, Richard J. Daker, Yangping Li, Xipei Guo, Weina Lei, Wenbo Deng, Weiping Hu","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2275981","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2275981","url":null,"abstract":"While creativity anxiety has been found to have negative relationships with various creative outcomes, whether creativity anxiety would also negatively influence creative cognitive styles (i.e. ide...","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2023-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138509169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Process Definition of Creativity 创造力的过程定义
IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2254573
Adam E. Green, Roger E. Beaty, Yoed N. Kenett, James C. Kaufman
The “standard” definition of creativity as novel and useful describes creative products, but creativity is constituted by processes. This misalignment contributes to the oft-noted challenges of ope...
创造力的“标准”定义是新颖和有用的,描述的是创造性的产品,但创造力是由过程构成的。这种错位导致了人们经常注意到的开放挑战。
{"title":"The Process Definition of Creativity","authors":"Adam E. Green, Roger E. Beaty, Yoed N. Kenett, James C. Kaufman","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2254573","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2254573","url":null,"abstract":"The “standard” definition of creativity as novel and useful describes creative products, but creativity is constituted by processes. This misalignment contributes to the oft-noted challenges of ope...","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"18 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138509162","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Empirics vs. art theory: Exploring a factor structure of pictorial expression based on contemporary artworks 经验主义与艺术理论:以当代艺术作品为例,探索绘画表达的因素结构
3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2272104
Kerstin Schoch, Thomas Ostermann
ABSTRACTThe RizbA scale combines psychometrics and art theory and enables a measurement of pictorial expression. This study explores its factor structure and a potential gap between theory and empirics. A sample of 275 pictorial works by artists and nonprofessionals was rated by 179 art experts. Three CFA path models were specified: models A and B based on the empirical results of previous studies, C on the theory of the initial study. Model C was additionally tested on a combined dataset. A and B did not converge, C was associated with fit indices as follows: RSMEA = .122, CFI = .712, TLI = .679, SRMR = .135, for the combined dataset: RSMEA = .086, CFI = .740, TLI = .696, SRMR = .084. Only model C partly suggests an acceptable fit. The results speak to a methodological gap between empirics and theory, that might be solved by a postdisciplinary measurement model.KEYWORDS: art theoryconfirmatory factor analysisformal picture analysispictorial expressionvisual art AcknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully acknowledge Thomas Gengenbach for providing theoretical and practical support regarding IT. Thanks also to Rebecca Kahn for the feedback on the manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethics approvalThe authors received a positive vote of the Ethics Committee for Creative Arts Therapies at the Nürtingen-Geislingen University, Germany (Reference number 19C27J101W).Abbreviations API=Application programming interfaceCFA=Confirmatory factor analysisCFI=Comparative fit indexdf=Degrees of freedomMLE=Maximum likelihood estimateMLR=Robust maximum likelihood estimatorPAFA=Principal axis factor analysisPCA=Principal component analysisPHP=PHP: Hypertext PreprocessorRizbA=(Rating instrument for two-dimensional pictorial works) Ratinginstrument für zweidimensionale bildnerische ArbeitenRMSEA=Root mean square error of approximationSRMR=Standardized root-mean-square residualTLI=Tucker-Lewis Index
【摘要】RizbA量表结合了心理测量学和艺术理论,实现了对绘画表达的测量。本研究探讨其因素结构及理论与实证的潜在差距。179名艺术专家对艺术家和非专业人士的275幅绘画作品进行了评分。提出了三种CFA路径模型:A、B模型基于前人研究的实证结果,C模型基于初步研究的理论。模型C在一个组合数据集上进行了额外的测试。A和B不收敛,C与拟合指数相关如下:RSMEA = .122, CFI = .712, TLI = .679, SRMR = .135,对于组合数据集:RSMEA = .086, CFI = .740, TLI = .696, SRMR = .084。只有模型C部分表明可以接受。研究结果表明,实证和理论之间存在方法论上的差距,这可能会通过学科后测量模型来解决。关键词:艺术理论,验证性因素分析,形式图像分析,图像表现,视觉艺术感谢作者感谢Thomas Gengenbach在IT方面提供的理论和实践支持。也感谢Rebecca Kahn对手稿的反馈。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。作者获得了德国n rtingen- geislingen大学创造性艺术疗法伦理委员会(参考编号19C27J101W)的赞成票。缩写API=应用程序编程接口ecfa =验证性因子分析iscfi =比较拟合indexdf=自由度mle =最大似然估计atemlr =稳健最大似然估计pafa =主轴因子分析pca =主成分分析PHP=PHP:超文本预处理器rizba =(二维图像作品的评级工具)评级工具 rzweidimensionale bildnerische ArbeitenRMSEA=近似的均方根误差srmr =标准化均方根残差li =塔克-刘易斯指数
{"title":"Empirics vs. art theory: Exploring a factor structure of pictorial expression based on contemporary artworks","authors":"Kerstin Schoch, Thomas Ostermann","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2272104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2272104","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe RizbA scale combines psychometrics and art theory and enables a measurement of pictorial expression. This study explores its factor structure and a potential gap between theory and empirics. A sample of 275 pictorial works by artists and nonprofessionals was rated by 179 art experts. Three CFA path models were specified: models A and B based on the empirical results of previous studies, C on the theory of the initial study. Model C was additionally tested on a combined dataset. A and B did not converge, C was associated with fit indices as follows: RSMEA = .122, CFI = .712, TLI = .679, SRMR = .135, for the combined dataset: RSMEA = .086, CFI = .740, TLI = .696, SRMR = .084. Only model C partly suggests an acceptable fit. The results speak to a methodological gap between empirics and theory, that might be solved by a postdisciplinary measurement model.KEYWORDS: art theoryconfirmatory factor analysisformal picture analysispictorial expressionvisual art AcknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully acknowledge Thomas Gengenbach for providing theoretical and practical support regarding IT. Thanks also to Rebecca Kahn for the feedback on the manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethics approvalThe authors received a positive vote of the Ethics Committee for Creative Arts Therapies at the Nürtingen-Geislingen University, Germany (Reference number 19C27J101W).Abbreviations API=Application programming interfaceCFA=Confirmatory factor analysisCFI=Comparative fit indexdf=Degrees of freedomMLE=Maximum likelihood estimateMLR=Robust maximum likelihood estimatorPAFA=Principal axis factor analysisPCA=Principal component analysisPHP=PHP: Hypertext PreprocessorRizbA=(Rating instrument for two-dimensional pictorial works) Ratinginstrument für zweidimensionale bildnerische ArbeitenRMSEA=Root mean square error of approximationSRMR=Standardized root-mean-square residualTLI=Tucker-Lewis Index","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"224 23","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135475815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Group Music Creativity Intervention for Adults with Varying Cognitive Function 群体音乐创意干预成人认知功能差异的可行性与可接受性
3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2272105
E. Lydia Wu-Chung, Anthony K. Brandt, Melia E. Bonomo, Bryan T. Denny, Christof Karmonik, J. Todd Frazier, Karl Blench, Christopher P. Fagundes
ABSTRACTMaintaining healthy cognitive functioning and delaying cognitive decline in cognitively intact and cognitively impaired adults are major research initiatives for addressing dementia disease burden. Music interventions are promising, non-pharmaceutical treatment options for preserving cognitive function and psychological health in older adults with varying levels of cognitive function. While passive, music interventions have attracted considerable attention in the abnormal cognitive aging literature, active, music interventions such as music creativity are less well-studied. Among 58 older adults with different levels of cognitive function (cognitively healthy to mild cognitive impairment), we examined the feasibility and acceptability of Project CHROMA, a Stage 1 clinical trial developed to assess the effects of a novel, music creativity curriculum on various health outcomes. Music intervention participation (93%), overall study retention (78%), and intervention satisfaction (100%) rates were comparable to other similarly designed clinical trials. Exploratory analyses using mixed-level modeling tested the efficacy of the intervention on cognitive and psychological outcomes. Compared to those in the control condition, participants in the music condition showed some improvements in cognitive functioning and socioemotional well-being. Findings suggest that a 6-week music creativity clinical trial with several multi-modal health assessments can be feasibly implemented within a sample of varying cognitive ability.KEYWORDS: creativitymusicmild cognitive impairmentcognitionclinical trialquality of life AcknowledgmentsThe authors want to thank study coordinators - Kristi English, Yoully Kang, Vincent Lai, and Russell Ku - for their diligence in managing the project amidst changing public health circumstances.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2272105Additional informationFundingThis work was funded by the National Endowment for the Arts (1855491-38-C-19, 1892183-38-21) and the Center for Performing Arts Houston Methodist Hospital. Authors are also funded by the National Institute on Aging (Fagundes: 1R01AG062690, 1R01AG062690-02S1, 1R21AG061597-01A1; Wu-Chung: 1F31AG074648) and National Library of Medicine (Bonomo: T15LM007093).
摘要维持认知完整和认知受损成人的健康认知功能和延缓认知衰退是解决痴呆疾病负担的主要研究举措。音乐干预是有希望的,非药物治疗的选择,以保持认知功能和心理健康的老年人有不同程度的认知功能。虽然被动的音乐干预在异常认知衰老的文献中引起了相当大的关注,但主动的音乐干预,如音乐创造力,研究得较少。在58名具有不同认知功能水平(认知健康到轻度认知障碍)的老年人中,我们检验了CHROMA项目的可行性和可接受性,这是一项旨在评估一种新颖的音乐创造力课程对各种健康结果的影响的1期临床试验。音乐干预的参与率(93%)、总体研究保留率(78%)和干预满意度(100%)与其他类似设计的临床试验相当。使用混合水平模型的探索性分析测试了干预对认知和心理结果的有效性。与对照组相比,音乐组的参与者在认知功能和社会情感健康方面表现出一些改善。研究结果表明,一项为期6周的音乐创造力临床试验可以在不同认知能力的样本中实施几种多模式健康评估。作者要感谢研究协调员Kristi English、Yoully Kang、Vincent Lai和Russell Ku,感谢他们在不断变化的公共卫生环境中管理这个项目。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究由国家艺术基金会(1855491-38- c - 19,1892183 -38-21)和休斯顿卫理医院表演艺术中心资助。作者也由美国国家老龄研究所资助(Fagundes: 1R01AG062690, 1R01AG062690- 02s1, 1R21AG061597-01A1;Wu-Chung: 1F31AG074648)和国家医学图书馆(Bonomo: T15LM007093)。
{"title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of a Group Music Creativity Intervention for Adults with Varying Cognitive Function","authors":"E. Lydia Wu-Chung, Anthony K. Brandt, Melia E. Bonomo, Bryan T. Denny, Christof Karmonik, J. Todd Frazier, Karl Blench, Christopher P. Fagundes","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2272105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2272105","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTMaintaining healthy cognitive functioning and delaying cognitive decline in cognitively intact and cognitively impaired adults are major research initiatives for addressing dementia disease burden. Music interventions are promising, non-pharmaceutical treatment options for preserving cognitive function and psychological health in older adults with varying levels of cognitive function. While passive, music interventions have attracted considerable attention in the abnormal cognitive aging literature, active, music interventions such as music creativity are less well-studied. Among 58 older adults with different levels of cognitive function (cognitively healthy to mild cognitive impairment), we examined the feasibility and acceptability of Project CHROMA, a Stage 1 clinical trial developed to assess the effects of a novel, music creativity curriculum on various health outcomes. Music intervention participation (93%), overall study retention (78%), and intervention satisfaction (100%) rates were comparable to other similarly designed clinical trials. Exploratory analyses using mixed-level modeling tested the efficacy of the intervention on cognitive and psychological outcomes. Compared to those in the control condition, participants in the music condition showed some improvements in cognitive functioning and socioemotional well-being. Findings suggest that a 6-week music creativity clinical trial with several multi-modal health assessments can be feasibly implemented within a sample of varying cognitive ability.KEYWORDS: creativitymusicmild cognitive impairmentcognitionclinical trialquality of life AcknowledgmentsThe authors want to thank study coordinators - Kristi English, Yoully Kang, Vincent Lai, and Russell Ku - for their diligence in managing the project amidst changing public health circumstances.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2272105Additional informationFundingThis work was funded by the National Endowment for the Arts (1855491-38-C-19, 1892183-38-21) and the Center for Performing Arts Houston Methodist Hospital. Authors are also funded by the National Institute on Aging (Fagundes: 1R01AG062690, 1R01AG062690-02S1, 1R21AG061597-01A1; Wu-Chung: 1F31AG074648) and National Library of Medicine (Bonomo: T15LM007093).","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"224 16","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135475627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Personal Perspective on Psychology of Aesthetics and the Arts: Ecologically Valid, Interdisciplinary, and Diverse Methodologies 美学与艺术心理学的个人视角:生态学上有效的、跨学科的、多样化的方法论
3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2023-11-07 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2269339
Eva Specker
In this invited paper, my aim is to introduce the reader to my body of work by outlining where I think empirical aesthetics, and specifically the study of art, is moving or should be moving toward. I will introduce two main foci of my work: 1) studying art/aesthetics outside of the laboratory and in their “natural habitat,” i.e. doing ecologically valid studies (most commonly in the museum), and 2) methodological aspects of studying art/aesthetic experience in a broad sense: including theory, measurement, and analysis. As future directions, I see a shift toward investigating potential outcomes, as well as ensuring a stronger connection between theory and methodology by incorporating interdisciplinary approaches as well as using more advanced statistical modeling. My aim is to show not just what I have done in the past, but also how this shaped the work that I am currently doing as well as the direction that I see my work developing in and that I believe should be pursued, not just by me but by many others. I chose this format in order to be able to show how I think my work contributes to these developments and can, hopefully, also keep contributing in the future.
在这篇受邀的论文中,我的目的是通过概述我认为经验主义美学,特别是艺术研究正在或应该走向的方向,向读者介绍我的工作。我将介绍我工作的两个主要焦点:1)在实验室之外和他们的“自然栖息地”研究艺术/美学,即做生态有效的研究(最常见的是在博物馆),以及2)在广义上研究艺术/美学经验的方法论方面:包括理论,测量和分析。作为未来的方向,我看到了向调查潜在结果的转变,以及通过结合跨学科方法和使用更先进的统计建模来确保理论和方法之间更强的联系。我的目的不仅是要展示我过去所做的工作,还要展示我现在所做的工作是如何形成的,以及我认为我的工作发展的方向,以及我认为应该追求的方向,不仅仅是我,还有许多其他人。我选择这种形式是为了能够展示我认为我的工作是如何为这些发展做出贡献的,并且希望在未来也能继续做出贡献。
{"title":"A Personal Perspective on Psychology of Aesthetics and the Arts: Ecologically Valid, Interdisciplinary, and Diverse Methodologies","authors":"Eva Specker","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2269339","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2269339","url":null,"abstract":"In this invited paper, my aim is to introduce the reader to my body of work by outlining where I think empirical aesthetics, and specifically the study of art, is moving or should be moving toward. I will introduce two main foci of my work: 1) studying art/aesthetics outside of the laboratory and in their “natural habitat,” i.e. doing ecologically valid studies (most commonly in the museum), and 2) methodological aspects of studying art/aesthetic experience in a broad sense: including theory, measurement, and analysis. As future directions, I see a shift toward investigating potential outcomes, as well as ensuring a stronger connection between theory and methodology by incorporating interdisciplinary approaches as well as using more advanced statistical modeling. My aim is to show not just what I have done in the past, but also how this shaped the work that I am currently doing as well as the direction that I see my work developing in and that I believe should be pursued, not just by me but by many others. I chose this format in order to be able to show how I think my work contributes to these developments and can, hopefully, also keep contributing in the future.","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"272 10‐34","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135474824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Are False Memory and Creative Thinking Mediated by Common Neural Substrates? An fMRI Meta-Analysis 错误记忆和创造性思维是否由共同的神经基质介导?fMRI荟萃分析
3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2269356
Preston P. Thakral, Connor C. Starkey, Aleea L. Devitt, Daniel L. Schacter
{"title":"Are False Memory and Creative Thinking Mediated by Common Neural Substrates? An fMRI Meta-Analysis","authors":"Preston P. Thakral, Connor C. Starkey, Aleea L. Devitt, Daniel L. Schacter","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2269356","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2269356","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"4 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136102979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Creativity Assessment, Research, and Practice in the Age of Artificial Intelligence 人工智能时代的创造力评估、研究与实践
3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2271749
Selcuk Acar
{"title":"Creativity Assessment, Research, and Practice in the Age of Artificial Intelligence","authors":"Selcuk Acar","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2271749","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2271749","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"140 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136102809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Updating the Standard Definition of Creativity to Account for the Artificial Creativity of AI 更新创造力的标准定义,以考虑人工智能的人工创造力
3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2257977
Mark A. Runco
ABSTRACTRecent developments in AI compel an update of the “standard definition of creativity.” This short article cites various proposed additions to the standard definition, which point to Surprise, Value, Authenticity, and Intentionality. The latter two are the most useful when distinguishing human from artificial (machine) creativity. Artificial creativity can be contrasted with pseudo-creativity as well as human creativity. Artificial creativity may be the best way to describe the output from AI. Even when that output is original and effective, it lacks the authenticity and intentionality that is apparent in human creativity. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. As of June 2023.
人工智能的最新发展迫使人们对“创造力的标准定义”进行更新。这篇短文引用了对标准定义的各种建议,包括惊喜、价值、真实性和意向性。后两者在区分人类创造力和人工(机器)创造力时最有用。人工创造力可以与伪创造力对比,也可以与人的创造力对比。人工创造力可能是描述人工智能产出的最佳方式。即使这种产出是原创和有效的,它也缺乏人类创造力中显而易见的真实性和意向性。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。截至2023年6月。
{"title":"Updating the Standard Definition of Creativity to Account for the Artificial Creativity of AI","authors":"Mark A. Runco","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2257977","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2257977","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTRecent developments in AI compel an update of the “standard definition of creativity.” This short article cites various proposed additions to the standard definition, which point to Surprise, Value, Authenticity, and Intentionality. The latter two are the most useful when distinguishing human from artificial (machine) creativity. Artificial creativity can be contrasted with pseudo-creativity as well as human creativity. Artificial creativity may be the best way to describe the output from AI. Even when that output is original and effective, it lacks the authenticity and intentionality that is apparent in human creativity. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. As of June 2023.","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136254306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
The Evaluation and Selection of Creative Ideas in Educational Settings: Current Knowledge and Future Directions 教育环境中创意的评价与选择:当前知识与未来方向
3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Pub Date : 2023-09-26 DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2023.2253403
Kim van Broekhoven
Worldwide, student-centered pedagogies have emerged in education to develop creativity. However, these pedagogies do not automatically enhance students’ creativity, because students tend to underestimate and reject creative ideas – even when highly novel ideas are required to solve the problem at hand. Understanding how students evaluate and select ideas is crucial for enhancing creativity. Therefore, this paper reviews research on idea evaluation and idea selection among students. This paper suggests that the evaluation of ideas depends both on specific and general components, and a mild state of affect and openness to experience seems to play a significant role. To improve idea evaluation and idea selection, students should be exposed to a variety of ideas and effective instructional strategies benefit students as well. Teachers should explicitly instruct students to select creative ideas and encourage them to simultaneously generate and refine ideas. However, instructing students to transform their creative ideas into tangible products may unintentionally influence their choices for creative ideas. Balancing novelty and usefulness pose challenges for students during evaluation and selection, and teachers should attune to students’ reactions as much as possible (e.g. accommodating emotional outbursts). Finally, several future trends and important research questions are highlighted.
在世界范围内,以学生为中心的教学法已经出现在教育中,以培养创造力。然而,这些教学方法并不能自动提高学生的创造力,因为学生往往会低估和拒绝创造性的想法——即使是在解决手头问题需要非常新颖的想法时。了解学生如何评价和选择想法对提高创造力至关重要。因此,本文对学生思想评价和思想选择的研究进行了综述。本文认为,对思想的评价既取决于具体成分,也取决于一般成分,温和的情感状态和对经验的开放性似乎起着重要作用。为了提高学生对创意的评价和选择,学生应该接触到各种各样的创意,有效的教学策略也应该让学生受益。教师应该明确地指导学生选择创造性的想法,并鼓励他们同时产生和完善想法。然而,指导学生将他们的创意转化为有形的产品可能会无意中影响他们对创意的选择。在评估和选择过程中,平衡新颖性和实用性给学生带来了挑战,教师应尽可能地适应学生的反应(例如,适应情绪爆发)。最后,指出了未来的发展趋势和重要的研究问题。
{"title":"The Evaluation and Selection of Creative Ideas in Educational Settings: Current Knowledge and Future Directions","authors":"Kim van Broekhoven","doi":"10.1080/10400419.2023.2253403","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2023.2253403","url":null,"abstract":"Worldwide, student-centered pedagogies have emerged in education to develop creativity. However, these pedagogies do not automatically enhance students’ creativity, because students tend to underestimate and reject creative ideas – even when highly novel ideas are required to solve the problem at hand. Understanding how students evaluate and select ideas is crucial for enhancing creativity. Therefore, this paper reviews research on idea evaluation and idea selection among students. This paper suggests that the evaluation of ideas depends both on specific and general components, and a mild state of affect and openness to experience seems to play a significant role. To improve idea evaluation and idea selection, students should be exposed to a variety of ideas and effective instructional strategies benefit students as well. Teachers should explicitly instruct students to select creative ideas and encourage them to simultaneously generate and refine ideas. However, instructing students to transform their creative ideas into tangible products may unintentionally influence their choices for creative ideas. Balancing novelty and usefulness pose challenges for students during evaluation and selection, and teachers should attune to students’ reactions as much as possible (e.g. accommodating emotional outbursts). Finally, several future trends and important research questions are highlighted.","PeriodicalId":48144,"journal":{"name":"Creativity Research Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134958113","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Creativity Research Journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1