首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Personality Disorders最新文献

英文 中文
Situating Psychopathy Within the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) Among Italian Community-Dwelling Adults. 在意大利社区居住成人的DSM-5人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)中定位精神病。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.49
Isabella M Palumbo, Claudio Sica, Christopher J Patrick, Robert D Latzman

Given growing evidence for a joint hierarchical framework of clinical and personality symptomatology, situating triarchic traits within this model would acknowledge transdiagnostic trait-related variance and provide a basis for linking the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) domains to established indicators of these neurobehavioral traits. The current study (N = 2,041 Italian adults) sought to replicate and extend recent evidence regarding the locations of triarchic traits within the AMPD and to examine relations with criterion measures at different levels of the hierarchy. "Bass-ackwards" analyses revealed a hierarchical structure of personality pathology in which triarchic traits aligned with broad dispositional domains of the AMPD. Boldness, meanness, and disinhibition were clearly situated within the Externalizing branch of the hierarchy and helped to differentiate the Negative Affect, Antagonism, Detachment, and Disinhibition domains at lower levels. The current findings support the view of psychopathy as multidimensional and encompassing developmentally meaningful and neurobehaviorally relevant traits.

鉴于越来越多的证据表明临床和人格症状学的联合层次框架,将三重特征置于该模型中将承认跨诊断特征相关的差异,并为将DSM-5人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)域与这些神经行为特征的既定指标联系起来提供基础。目前的研究(N = 2041名意大利成年人)试图复制和扩展最近关于AMPD中三等级特征位置的证据,并检查不同等级标准测量的关系。“bass - backward”分析揭示了人格病理学的层次结构,其中三分型特征与AMPD的广泛性格域相一致。大胆、刻薄和去抑制清楚地位于层次结构的外化分支,并有助于区分较低层次的消极影响、对抗、脱离和去抑制域。目前的研究结果支持精神病是多维的,包括发展意义和神经行为相关的特征的观点。
{"title":"Situating Psychopathy Within the <i>DSM-5</i> Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) Among Italian Community-Dwelling Adults.","authors":"Isabella M Palumbo,&nbsp;Claudio Sica,&nbsp;Christopher J Patrick,&nbsp;Robert D Latzman","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.49","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.49","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given growing evidence for a joint hierarchical framework of clinical and personality symptomatology, situating triarchic traits within this model would acknowledge transdiagnostic trait-related variance and provide a basis for linking the <i>DSM-5</i> Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) domains to established indicators of these neurobehavioral traits. The current study (<i>N</i> = 2,041 Italian adults) sought to replicate and extend recent evidence regarding the locations of triarchic traits within the AMPD and to examine relations with criterion measures at different levels of the hierarchy. \"Bass-ackwards\" analyses revealed a hierarchical structure of personality pathology in which triarchic traits aligned with broad dispositional domains of the AMPD. Boldness, meanness, and disinhibition were clearly situated within the Externalizing branch of the hierarchy and helped to differentiate the Negative Affect, Antagonism, Detachment, and Disinhibition domains at lower levels. The current findings support the view of psychopathy as multidimensional and encompassing developmentally meaningful and neurobehaviorally relevant traits.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"37 1","pages":"49-70"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10660962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD): A Network Analysis in a Highly Traumatized Clinical Sample. 边缘型人格障碍(BPD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD):一个高度创伤临床样本的网络分析。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.112
Marcin Owczarek, Thanos Karatzias, Eoin McElroy, Philip Hyland, Marylène Cloitre, Leonhard Kratzer, Matthias Knefel, Graeme Grandison, Grace W K Ho, Deborah Morris, Mark Shevlin

Whether complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) diagnoses differ substantially enough to warrant separate diagnostic classifications has been a subject of controversy for years. To contribute to the nomological network of cumulative evidence, the main goal of the present study was to explore, using network analysis, how the symptoms of ICD-11 PTSD and disturbances in self-organization (DSO) are interconnected with BPD in a clinical sample of polytraumatized individuals (N = 330). Participants completed measures of life events, CPTSD, and BPD. Overall, our study suggests that BPD and CPTSD are largely separated. The bridges between BPD and CPTSD symptom clusters were scarce, with "Affective Dysregulation" items being the only items related to BPD. The present study contributes to the growing literature on discriminant validity of CPTSD and supports its distinctiveness from BPD. Implications for treatment are discussed.

复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)和边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的诊断是否存在足够大的差异,以保证单独的诊断分类,这是多年来争议的主题。为了建立一个累积证据的法理学网络,本研究的主要目的是利用网络分析,在多创伤个体(N = 330)的临床样本中,探索ICD-11创伤后应激障碍和自组织障碍(DSO)的症状如何与BPD相互关联。参与者完成了生活事件、CPTSD和BPD的测量。总的来说,我们的研究表明BPD和CPTSD在很大程度上是分开的。BPD和CPTSD症状群之间的联系很少,“情感失调”是唯一与BPD相关的项目。本研究对CPTSD鉴别效度的文献研究做出了贡献,并支持了CPTSD与BPD的区别。讨论了治疗的意义。
{"title":"Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD): A Network Analysis in a Highly Traumatized Clinical Sample.","authors":"Marcin Owczarek,&nbsp;Thanos Karatzias,&nbsp;Eoin McElroy,&nbsp;Philip Hyland,&nbsp;Marylène Cloitre,&nbsp;Leonhard Kratzer,&nbsp;Matthias Knefel,&nbsp;Graeme Grandison,&nbsp;Grace W K Ho,&nbsp;Deborah Morris,&nbsp;Mark Shevlin","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.112","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whether complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) diagnoses differ substantially enough to warrant separate diagnostic classifications has been a subject of controversy for years. To contribute to the nomological network of cumulative evidence, the main goal of the present study was to explore, using network analysis, how the symptoms of ICD-11 PTSD and disturbances in self-organization (DSO) are interconnected with BPD in a clinical sample of polytraumatized individuals <i>(N</i> = 330). Participants completed measures of life events, CPTSD, and BPD. Overall, our study suggests that BPD and CPTSD are largely separated. The bridges between BPD and CPTSD symptom clusters were scarce, with \"Affective Dysregulation\" items being the only items related to BPD. The present study contributes to the growing literature on discriminant validity of CPTSD and supports its distinctiveness from BPD. Implications for treatment are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"37 1","pages":"112-129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10651061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Identifying Splitting Through Sentiment Analysis. 通过情感分析识别分裂。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.36
Tiziano Colibazzi, Avner Abrami, Barry Stern, Eve Caligor, Eric A Fertuck, Michael Lubin, John Clarkin, Guillermo Cecchi

In Kernerg's Object Relations Theory model of personality pathology, splitting, the mutual polarization of aspects of experience, is thought to result in a failure of identity integration. The authors sought to identify a clinician-independent, automated measure of splitting by examining 54 subjects' natural speech. Splitting in these individuals, recruited from the community, was investigated and evaluated with a shortened version of the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO-R). A type of automated sentiment textual analysis called VADER was applied to transcripts from the section of the STIPO-R that probes identity integration. Higher variability in speech valence, more negative minimum valence, and more frequent shifts in valence polarity were associated with more severe identity disturbance. The authors concluded that the degree of splitting elicited during the description of self and others is related to the degree of identity disturbance, and to the degree of negativity and instability of these descriptions of self and others.

在Kernerg的人格病理学客体关系理论模型中,分裂,即经验方面的相互极化,被认为会导致身份整合的失败。作者试图通过检查54名受试者的自然语言来确定一种独立于临床的、自动的分裂测量方法。研究人员从社区中招募了这些人,对他们的分裂进行了调查和评估,并采用了精简版的人格组织结构化访谈(STIPO-R)。一种名为VADER的自动情感文本分析被应用于STIPO-R中探测身份整合的部分的转录本。言语效价变异性越大、最低负效价越高、效价极性变化越频繁,同一性障碍越严重。作者得出结论,在自我和他人描述过程中引发的分裂程度与身份障碍的程度以及这些自我和他人描述的消极性和不稳定性程度有关。
{"title":"Identifying Splitting Through Sentiment Analysis.","authors":"Tiziano Colibazzi,&nbsp;Avner Abrami,&nbsp;Barry Stern,&nbsp;Eve Caligor,&nbsp;Eric A Fertuck,&nbsp;Michael Lubin,&nbsp;John Clarkin,&nbsp;Guillermo Cecchi","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.36","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.36","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Kernerg's Object Relations Theory model of personality pathology, splitting, the mutual polarization of aspects of experience, is thought to result in a failure of identity integration. The authors sought to identify a clinician-independent, automated measure of splitting by examining 54 subjects' natural speech. Splitting in these individuals, recruited from the community, was investigated and evaluated with a shortened version of the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO-R). A type of automated sentiment textual analysis called VADER was applied to transcripts from the section of the STIPO-R that probes identity integration. Higher variability in speech valence, more negative minimum valence, and more frequent shifts in valence polarity were associated with more severe identity disturbance. The authors concluded that the degree of splitting elicited during the description of self and others is related to the degree of identity disturbance, and to the degree of negativity and instability of these descriptions of self and others.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"37 1","pages":"36-48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10660958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Attitudes, Clinical Practices, and Perceived Advocacy Needs of Professionals With Interests in Personality Disorders. 对人格障碍感兴趣的专业人员的态度、临床实践和感知的倡导需求。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.1
William D Ellison, Steven Huprich, Alex Behn, Marianne Goodman, Sophie Kerr, Kenneth N Levy, Sharon M Nelson, Carla Sharp

Experts in personality disorders (PDs) generally prefer dimensional diagnostic systems to categorical ones, but less is known about experts' attitudes toward personality pathology diagnoses in adolescents, and little is known about public health shortfalls and advocacy needs and how these might differ geographically. To fill these gaps, the International Society for the Study of Personality Disorders surveyed 248 professionals with interests in PDs about their attitudes toward different diagnostic systems for adults and adolescents, their PD-related clinical practices, and perceived advocacy needs in their area. Results suggested that dimensional diagnostic systems are preferable to categorical and that skepticism about personality pathology in adolescents may not be warranted. The most pressing advocacy need was the increased availability of PD-related services, but many other needs were identified. Results provide a blueprint for advocacy and suggest ways that professional societies can collaborate with public health bodies to expand the reach of PD expertise and services.

人格障碍(pd)专家通常更喜欢维度诊断系统而不是分类诊断系统,但对专家对青少年人格病理学诊断的态度知之甚少,对公共卫生不足和宣传需求以及这些需求在地理上的差异知之甚少。为了填补这些空白,国际人格障碍研究协会调查了248名对人格障碍感兴趣的专业人士,了解他们对不同成人和青少年诊断系统的态度,他们与人格障碍相关的临床实践,以及他们所在领域的宣传需求。结果表明,维度诊断系统比分类诊断系统更可取,对青少年人格病理学的怀疑可能没有根据。最紧迫的宣传需要是增加与pd相关的服务,但也确定了许多其他需要。研究结果为宣传提供了蓝图,并提出了专业协会与公共卫生机构合作扩大PD专业知识和服务范围的方法。
{"title":"Attitudes, Clinical Practices, and Perceived Advocacy Needs of Professionals With Interests in Personality Disorders.","authors":"William D Ellison,&nbsp;Steven Huprich,&nbsp;Alex Behn,&nbsp;Marianne Goodman,&nbsp;Sophie Kerr,&nbsp;Kenneth N Levy,&nbsp;Sharon M Nelson,&nbsp;Carla Sharp","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Experts in personality disorders (PDs) generally prefer dimensional diagnostic systems to categorical ones, but less is known about experts' attitudes toward personality pathology diagnoses in adolescents, and little is known about public health shortfalls and advocacy needs and how these might differ geographically. To fill these gaps, the International Society for the Study of Personality Disorders surveyed 248 professionals with interests in PDs about their attitudes toward different diagnostic systems for adults and adolescents, their PD-related clinical practices, and perceived advocacy needs in their area. Results suggested that dimensional diagnostic systems are preferable to categorical and that skepticism about personality pathology in adolescents may not be warranted. The most pressing advocacy need was the increased availability of PD-related services, but many other needs were identified. Results provide a blueprint for advocacy and suggest ways that professional societies can collaborate with public health bodies to expand the reach of PD expertise and services.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"37 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10315220/pdf/nihms-1909807.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9740775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Evaluating Dialectical Behavior Therapy Training With Mental Health Clinicians. 心理健康临床医师对辩证行为疗法培训的评价。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.95
Ansley M Bender, Ronan L H Wilson, Lisa Borntrager, Edmund W Orlowski, Kim Gryglewicz, Marc S Karver

A substantial body of research supports dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) as an evidence-based treatment for those with borderline personality disorder (BPD); however, there remains a lack of mental health clinicians trained in this modality, resulting in limited clinician competencies and skills. Furthermore, the effectiveness of DBT trainings with mental health clinicians remains understudied. The present study evaluated a comprehensive 5-day DBT-Linehan Board of Certification training program. Informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior, this study assessed changes in clinician knowledge, attitudes, perceived behavioral control (PBC), intentions, and behaviors relevant to DBT at baseline, posttraining, and 6-month follow-up. Results showed large, significant pre-to-post training improvements in clinicians' knowledge, attitudes, PBC, and intentions related to DBT implementation. Large improvements in knowledge, attitudes, and PBC were sustained at follow-up. A significant improvement in actual behaviors was also found at follow-up. Implications of the present study and directions for future research are discussed.

大量研究支持辩证行为疗法(DBT)作为边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者的循证治疗;然而,仍然缺乏接受过这种方式培训的心理健康临床医生,导致临床医生的能力和技能有限。此外,与心理健康临床医生进行DBT培训的有效性仍有待研究。本研究评估了一个全面的为期5天的DBT-Linehan认证委员会培训计划。根据计划行为理论,本研究评估了临床医生在基线、训练后和6个月随访期间与DBT相关的知识、态度、感知行为控制(PBC)、意图和行为的变化。结果显示,在临床医生实施DBT相关的知识、态度、PBC和意图方面,岗前培训有了显著的改善。在随访中,知识、态度和PBC都有了很大的改善。在随访中也发现了实际行为的显著改善。讨论了本研究的意义和未来的研究方向。
{"title":"Evaluating Dialectical Behavior Therapy Training With Mental Health Clinicians.","authors":"Ansley M Bender,&nbsp;Ronan L H Wilson,&nbsp;Lisa Borntrager,&nbsp;Edmund W Orlowski,&nbsp;Kim Gryglewicz,&nbsp;Marc S Karver","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.95","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.95","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A substantial body of research supports dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) as an evidence-based treatment for those with borderline personality disorder (BPD); however, there remains a lack of mental health clinicians trained in this modality, resulting in limited clinician competencies and skills. Furthermore, the effectiveness of DBT trainings with mental health clinicians remains understudied. The present study evaluated a comprehensive 5-day DBT-Linehan Board of Certification training program. Informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior, this study assessed changes in clinician knowledge, attitudes, perceived behavioral control (PBC), intentions, and behaviors relevant to DBT at baseline, posttraining, and 6-month follow-up. Results showed large, significant pre-to-post training improvements in clinicians' knowledge, attitudes, PBC, and intentions related to DBT implementation. Large improvements in knowledge, attitudes, and PBC were sustained at follow-up. A significant improvement in actual behaviors was also found at follow-up. Implications of the present study and directions for future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"37 1","pages":"95-111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10651062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Construct Validity of Triarchic Model Traits in the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study Using the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. 运用多维人格问卷在达尼丁多学科健康与发展研究中构建三角模式特征的效度。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.71
Emma Veltman, Richie Poulton, Christopher J Patrick, Martin Sellbom

The triarchic model of psychopathy emphasizes the role of three phenotypic personality domains (boldness, meanness, and disinhibition) that have been operationalized using the well-established Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. The present study sought to further validate the MPQ-Tri scales and examine their temporal stability and predictive validity across two time points (ages 18 and 26) from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, a population-representative and longitudinal sample (N = 1,037). This investigation necessitated modification of the MPQ-Tri scales to enable their use in a broader range of samples, including the Dunedin Study. The revised MPQ-Tri scales demonstrated good temporal stability, and correlation and multiple linear regression analyses predominantly revealed associations consistent with theoretical expectations. Overall, the findings provide support for the MPQ-Tri scales as reliable, stable, and valid measures of the triarchic constructs, which provide a unique opportunity to examine highly novel research questions concerning psychopathy in a wide variety of samples.

精神病的三重模型强调了三种表型人格域(大胆,卑鄙和去抑制)的作用,这些人格域已经通过完善的多维人格问卷进行了操作。本研究试图进一步验证MPQ-Tri量表,并从达尼丁多学科健康与发展研究中检验其在两个时间点(18岁和26岁)的时间稳定性和预测有效性,这是一个具有人口代表性的纵向样本(N = 1,037)。这项调查需要修改MPQ-Tri量表,使其能够在更广泛的样本范围内使用,包括达尼丁研究。修正后的MPQ-Tri量表表现出良好的时间稳定性,相关分析和多元线性回归分析主要显示了与理论预期一致的关联。总的来说,这些发现为MPQ-Tri量表作为可靠、稳定和有效的三重结构测量提供了支持,它提供了一个独特的机会,可以在各种各样的样本中检查有关精神病的高度新颖的研究问题。
{"title":"Construct Validity of Triarchic Model Traits in the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study Using the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire.","authors":"Emma Veltman,&nbsp;Richie Poulton,&nbsp;Christopher J Patrick,&nbsp;Martin Sellbom","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.71","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.71","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The triarchic model of psychopathy emphasizes the role of three phenotypic personality domains (boldness, meanness, and disinhibition) that have been operationalized using the well-established Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. The present study sought to further validate the MPQ-Tri scales and examine their temporal stability and predictive validity across two time points (ages 18 and 26) from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, a population-representative and longitudinal sample (<i>N</i> = 1,037). This investigation necessitated modification of the MPQ-Tri scales to enable their use in a broader range of samples, including the Dunedin Study. The revised MPQ-Tri scales demonstrated good temporal stability, and correlation and multiple linear regression analyses predominantly revealed associations consistent with theoretical expectations. Overall, the findings provide support for the MPQ-Tri scales as reliable, stable, and valid measures of the triarchic constructs, which provide a unique opportunity to examine highly novel research questions concerning psychopathy in a wide variety of samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"37 1","pages":"71-94"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10651063","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Synergistic Effects of Neuroticism and Extraversion on Suicidal Ideation, Single Attempts, and Multiple Attempts in an Inpatient Sample. 神经质和外向性对住院病人自杀意念、单次尝试和多次尝试的协同作用。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2022.36.6.717
Chandler J McDaniel, Hilary L DeShong, Katrina Rufino, Michael R Nadorff

The current study sought to investigate the differential risk/protective factors of neuroticism and extraversion among individuals with only suicide ideation, those with a single suicide attempt, and those with multiple attempts. We hypothesized that extraversion would moderate the relation between neuroticism and suicide attempts (single and multiple) but not ideation. Patients in a private facility (N = 3343) completed measures assessing suicide history and general personality traits. Four moderation analyses were conducted with extraversion moderating the relationship between neuroticism and suicide ideation, single attempt (compared to zero attempts), and multiple attempts (compared to zero attempts and to single attempts). Extraversion moderated neuroticism only when comparing individuals with multiple suicide attempts to those with no attempts. Individuals who were low in both neuroticism and extraversion had higher levels of attempts than individuals with low neuroticism and high extraversion, highlighting the importance of considering biological predispositions as risk factors for suicide.

本研究旨在探讨只有自杀意念者、有一次自杀企图者和多次自杀企图者的神经质和外向性的不同风险/保护因素。我们假设外向性会调节神经质和自杀企图(单一和多重)之间的关系,但不会调节意念。私立医院的病人(N = 3343)完成了自杀史和一般人格特征的评估。对神经质与自杀意念、单次自杀企图(与零自杀企图相比)和多次自杀企图(与零自杀企图和单次自杀企图相比)之间的关系进行了四项调节分析。只有在将多次自杀企图的个体与没有自杀企图的个体进行比较时,外向性才会缓和神经质。神经质和外向性都较低的个体比神经质和外向性都较低的个体有更高的自杀企图,这突出了将生物倾向作为自杀风险因素考虑的重要性。
{"title":"The Synergistic Effects of Neuroticism and Extraversion on Suicidal Ideation, Single Attempts, and Multiple Attempts in an Inpatient Sample.","authors":"Chandler J McDaniel,&nbsp;Hilary L DeShong,&nbsp;Katrina Rufino,&nbsp;Michael R Nadorff","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2022.36.6.717","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2022.36.6.717","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study sought to investigate the differential risk/protective factors of neuroticism and extraversion among individuals with only suicide ideation, those with a single suicide attempt, and those with multiple attempts. We hypothesized that extraversion would moderate the relation between neuroticism and suicide attempts (single and multiple) but not ideation. Patients in a private facility (N = 3343) completed measures assessing suicide history and general personality traits. Four moderation analyses were conducted with extraversion moderating the relationship between neuroticism and suicide ideation, single attempt (compared to zero attempts), and multiple attempts (compared to zero attempts and to single attempts). Extraversion moderated neuroticism only when comparing individuals with multiple suicide attempts to those with no attempts. Individuals who were low in both neuroticism and extraversion had higher levels of attempts than individuals with low neuroticism and high extraversion, highlighting the importance of considering biological predispositions as risk factors for suicide.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"36 6","pages":"717-730"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10782163","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Examining the Construct Validity of Borderline Personality Traits Using Familial Aggregation and Other External Validators. 用家族聚合和其他外部验证器检验边缘型人格特质的构念效度。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2022.36.6.641
Allison M Letkiewicz, Justin D Spring, Vivian L Carrillo, Stewart A Shankman

Numerous studies have questioned the reliability and validity of borderline personality disorder's (BPD) categorical conceptualization. DSM-5 Section III's alternative trait-based model of BPD may better capture borderline pathology, but aspects of its validity should be further established. Thus, the authors examined whether a latent BPD factor derived from Section III traits exhibits (1) familial aggregation among siblings and (2) association with constructs related to borderline pathology. The authors also tested whether gender moderated associations. A total of 498 community-recruited adults completed the Personality Inventory for DSM-5, a behavioral assessment of risk-taking, and reported their history of childhood maltreatment, substance use, nonsuicidal self-injury, and suicidal ideation. Familial aggregation was assessed among 232 sibling pairs. Siblings' BPD scores were significantly correlated and most external validators were significantly associated with BPD, with the exception of risk-taking. Results did not vary by gender. Findings further support the construct validity of Section III's BPD trait profile.

许多研究质疑边缘型人格障碍(BPD)分类概念化的可靠性和有效性。DSM-5第三部分的替代性基于特征的BPD模型可能更好地捕捉边缘性病理,但其有效性方面有待进一步建立。因此,作者研究了来自第三部分特征的潜在BPD因子是否表现出(1)兄弟姐妹之间的家族聚集性和(2)与边缘性病理相关的结构相关。作者还测试了性别是否会调节这种关联。共有498名社区招募的成年人完成了DSM-5的人格量表,这是一项冒险行为评估,并报告了他们的童年虐待史、药物使用史、非自杀性自残史和自杀意念史。对232对兄弟姐妹进行家族聚集性评估。兄弟姐妹的BPD得分显著相关,大多数外部验证者与BPD显著相关,冒险行为除外。结果没有因性别而异。研究结果进一步支持了第三部分BPD特征谱的结构效度。
{"title":"Examining the Construct Validity of Borderline Personality Traits Using Familial Aggregation and Other External Validators.","authors":"Allison M Letkiewicz,&nbsp;Justin D Spring,&nbsp;Vivian L Carrillo,&nbsp;Stewart A Shankman","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2022.36.6.641","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2022.36.6.641","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Numerous studies have questioned the reliability and validity of borderline personality disorder's (BPD) categorical conceptualization. <i>DSM-5</i> Section III's alternative trait-based model of BPD may better capture borderline pathology, but aspects of its validity should be further established. Thus, the authors examined whether a latent BPD factor derived from Section III traits exhibits (1) familial aggregation among siblings and (2) association with constructs related to borderline pathology. The authors also tested whether gender moderated associations. A total of 498 community-recruited adults completed the Personality Inventory for <i>DSM-5</i>, a behavioral assessment of risk-taking, and reported their history of childhood maltreatment, substance use, nonsuicidal self-injury, and suicidal ideation. Familial aggregation was assessed among 232 sibling pairs. Siblings' BPD scores were significantly correlated and most external validators were significantly associated with BPD, with the exception of risk-taking. Results did not vary by gender. Findings further support the construct validity of Section III's BPD trait profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"36 6","pages":"641-661"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10074705/pdf/nihms-1883274.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9266794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of Multidimensional Schizotypy with PID-5 Domains and Facets. 多维分裂型与PID-5结构域和方面的关联。
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2022.36.6.680
Kathryn C Kemp, Jessica A Kaczorowski, Christopher J Burgin, Michael L Raulin, Donald R Lynam, Chelsea Sleep, Joshua D Miller, Neus Barrantes-Vidal, Thomas R Kwapil

The underlying vulnerability for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders is expressed across a continuum of clinical and subclinical symptoms referred to as schizotypy. Schizotypy is a multidimensional construct with positive, negative, and disorganized dimensions. The present study examined associations of positive, negative, and disorganized schizotypy with pathological personality traits and facets assessed by the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in 1,342 young adults. As hypothesized, positive schizotypy was associated with the PID-5 psychoticism domain and facets, negative schizotypy was associated with the detachment domain and facets and the restricted affectivity facet, and disorganized schizotypy's strongest associations were with the distractibility and eccentricity facets and the negative affect domain. The PID-5 facets accounted for upwards of two thirds of the variance in each schizotypy dimension. The authors conclude by providing regression-based algorithms for computing positive, negative, and disorganized schizotypy scores based on the PID-5 facets.

精神分裂症谱系障碍的潜在易感性表现为连续的临床和亚临床症状,称为分裂型。精神分裂型是一个具有积极、消极和无序维度的多维结构。本研究调查了1342名年轻人的阳性、阴性和无组织分裂型与病态人格特征的关系,并通过DSM-5人格量表(PID-5)评估了这些特征。研究结果表明,积极分裂型与抑郁-5型精神状态相关,消极分裂型与分离状态相关,消极情感状态相关,无序分裂型与分心、偏心状态相关,消极情感状态相关。在每个分裂型维度中,PID-5方面占变异的三分之二以上。作者通过提供基于回归的算法来计算基于PID-5方面的阳性、阴性和无组织分裂型得分。
{"title":"Association of Multidimensional Schizotypy with PID-5 Domains and Facets.","authors":"Kathryn C Kemp,&nbsp;Jessica A Kaczorowski,&nbsp;Christopher J Burgin,&nbsp;Michael L Raulin,&nbsp;Donald R Lynam,&nbsp;Chelsea Sleep,&nbsp;Joshua D Miller,&nbsp;Neus Barrantes-Vidal,&nbsp;Thomas R Kwapil","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2022.36.6.680","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2022.36.6.680","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The underlying vulnerability for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders is expressed across a continuum of clinical and subclinical symptoms referred to as schizotypy. Schizotypy is a multidimensional construct with positive, negative, and disorganized dimensions. The present study examined associations of positive, negative, and disorganized schizotypy with pathological personality traits and facets assessed by the Personality Inventory for <i>DSM-5</i> (PID-5) in 1,342 young adults. As hypothesized, positive schizotypy was associated with the PID-5 psychoticism domain and facets, negative schizotypy was associated with the detachment domain and facets and the restricted affectivity facet, and disorganized schizotypy's strongest associations were with the distractibility and eccentricity facets and the negative affect domain. The PID-5 facets accounted for upwards of two thirds of the variance in each schizotypy dimension. The authors conclude by providing regression-based algorithms for computing positive, negative, and disorganized schizotypy scores based on the PID-5 facets.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"36 6","pages":"680-700"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10851089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
The Relationship Between Patients' Personality Traits, the Alliance, and Change in Interpersonal Distress in Intensive Group Treatment for Personality Dysfunction. 人格障碍群体强化治疗中患者人格特质、联盟与人际困扰变化的关系
IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2022.36.6.731
Katie Aafjes-van Doorn, David Kealy, Johannes C Ehrenthal, John S Ogrodniczuk, Anthony S Joyce, Rainer Weber

This study examined patients' personality traits as operationalized by the five-factor model in relation to early alliance and reduction of interpersonal distress through an intensive group treatment program for personality dysfunction. A sample of 79 consecutively admitted psychiatric outpatients with personality dysfunction who attended an 18-week intensive group treatment program completed the NEO Five-Factor Inventory at pretreatment, the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems at pre- and posttreatment, and the Edmonton Therapeutic Alliance Scale, a measure of the therapeutic alliance with the program therapist, at Session 5. Results indicated that patients who were relatively extraverted tended to rate the alliance with their program therapist higher and subsequently reported more improvement of interpersonal distress. The presence of a personality disorder did not moderate this mediation. Patients' extraversion likely promotes a bonding with the therapist and facilitates the interpersonal group work necessary for improvement. Assessing patients' level of extraversion before starting intensive group treatment might indicate which intervention strategies could be useful with that patient within the program frame.

本研究通过人格功能障碍的强化团体治疗方案,考察了患者人格特质与早期联盟和减少人际困扰的关系,并采用五因素模型进行操作。79名连续入院的人格障碍精神科门诊患者参加了为期18周的强化小组治疗项目,他们在治疗前完成了NEO五因素量表,在治疗前和治疗后完成了人际问题量表,并在第5期完成了埃德蒙顿治疗联盟量表,该量表衡量了与项目治疗师的治疗联盟。结果表明,相对外向的患者倾向于评价与他们的项目治疗师的联盟,随后报告更多的人际关系困扰的改善。人格障碍的存在并没有缓和这种调解作用。患者的外向性可能促进了与治疗师的联系,并促进了改善所必需的人际团体工作。在开始强化小组治疗之前评估患者的外向性水平可能会表明哪种干预策略对该患者在方案框架内是有用的。
{"title":"The Relationship Between Patients' Personality Traits, the Alliance, and Change in Interpersonal Distress in Intensive Group Treatment for Personality Dysfunction.","authors":"Katie Aafjes-van Doorn,&nbsp;David Kealy,&nbsp;Johannes C Ehrenthal,&nbsp;John S Ogrodniczuk,&nbsp;Anthony S Joyce,&nbsp;Rainer Weber","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2022.36.6.731","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2022.36.6.731","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined patients' personality traits as operationalized by the five-factor model in relation to early alliance and reduction of interpersonal distress through an intensive group treatment program for personality dysfunction. A sample of 79 consecutively admitted psychiatric outpatients with personality dysfunction who attended an 18-week intensive group treatment program completed the NEO Five-Factor Inventory at pretreatment, the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems at pre- and posttreatment, and the Edmonton Therapeutic Alliance Scale, a measure of the therapeutic alliance with the program therapist, at Session 5. Results indicated that patients who were relatively extraverted tended to rate the alliance with their program therapist higher and subsequently reported more improvement of interpersonal distress. The presence of a personality disorder did not moderate this mediation. Patients' extraversion likely promotes a bonding with the therapist and facilitates the interpersonal group work necessary for improvement. Assessing patients' level of extraversion before starting intensive group treatment might indicate which intervention strategies could be useful with that patient within the program frame.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"36 6","pages":"731-748"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10800223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Personality Disorders
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1