首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Personality Disorders最新文献

英文 中文
Erratum. 勘误表。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2025.39.4.337
{"title":"Erratum.","authors":"","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2025.39.4.337","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2025.39.4.337","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"39 4","pages":"337"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144785636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychopathy Facets and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration and Victimization. 精神病态方面与亲密伴侣暴力的实施和受害。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2025.39.4.261
Haomin Ivy Chen, Edelyn Verona

While research has demonstrated the relationship between psychopathy and intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration, evidence is mixed regarding how psychopathy facets relate to different forms of IPV perpetration. Literature has also underexplored how psychopathy relates to IPV victimization. To address these gaps, we investigated specificity in relationships between four psychopathy facets (interpersonal, affective, lifestyle, antisocial) and three types of IPV perpetration and victimization experiences (physical, psychological, sexual) across three samples. Zero-order correlations and regressions were conducted separately, followed by z tests synthesizing the results. Across samples, correlations revealed small-to-moderate relationships between psychopathy facets and IPVs while multiple regressions revealed minimal-to-small unique effects of the facets. Findings highlight (a) that the lifestyle facet demonstrated the most consistent correlations with IPV experiences across samples while the other facets showed sample-specific relationships, and (b) that the limited unique effects of psychopathy facets implicate what they have in common as relevant to IPV experiences.

虽然研究已经证明了精神病和亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)犯罪之间的关系,但关于精神病方面与不同形式的IPV犯罪之间的关系,证据是混合的。文献也未充分探讨精神病与IPV受害之间的关系。为了解决这些差距,我们调查了三个样本中四个精神病方面(人际、情感、生活方式、反社会)与三种IPV犯罪和受害经历(身体、心理、性)之间关系的特异性。分别进行零阶相关和回归分析,然后进行z检验综合结果。在整个样本中,相关性揭示了精神病态方面和IPVs之间的小到中度关系,而多重回归揭示了这些方面的最小到小的独特影响。研究结果强调(a)生活方式方面与IPV经历在样本中表现出最一致的相关性,而其他方面则表现出样本特定的关系,以及(b)精神病方面有限的独特影响暗示了它们与IPV经历的共同之处。
{"title":"Psychopathy Facets and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration and Victimization.","authors":"Haomin Ivy Chen, Edelyn Verona","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2025.39.4.261","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2025.39.4.261","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While research has demonstrated the relationship between psychopathy and intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration, evidence is mixed regarding how psychopathy facets relate to different forms of IPV perpetration. Literature has also underexplored how psychopathy relates to IPV victimization. To address these gaps, we investigated specificity in relationships between four psychopathy facets (interpersonal, affective, lifestyle, antisocial) and three types of IPV perpetration and victimization experiences (physical, psychological, sexual) across three samples. Zero-order correlations and regressions were conducted separately, followed by <i>z</i> tests synthesizing the results. Across samples, correlations revealed small-to-moderate relationships between psychopathy facets and IPVs while multiple regressions revealed minimal-to-small unique effects of the facets. Findings highlight (a) that the lifestyle facet demonstrated the most consistent correlations with IPV experiences across samples while the other facets showed sample-specific relationships, and (b) that the limited unique effects of psychopathy facets implicate what they have in common as relevant to IPV experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"39 4","pages":"261-284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144785637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Childhood Maltreatment and Borderline Personality Pathology Among Young Women: The Buffering Role of Autobiographical Reasoning About Childhood Experiences. 青年女性童年虐待与边缘型人格病理:童年经历自传式推理的缓冲作用。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2025.39.4.285
Stephanie Milan, Mariah Xu, Ana Luisa Barbosa Dau, Adenique Lisse

According to narrative identity theory, the meaning and importance given to childhood events within one's life story (i.e., autobiographical reasoning [AR]) may help explain why only some individuals who experience childhood maltreatment (CM) develop borderline personality (BP) pathology. We test this hypothesis by examining whether AR about childhood emotional experiences, particularly perceived event centrality and meaning-making, moderate relations between CM and BP symptoms, BP traits, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in a diverse sample of 216 young women with a previous mental health diagnosis. Participants wrote recollections of negative emotional childhood events, rated the centrality of each recollection, and described the meaning of these events in their life story. Lower event centrality and positive meaning-making predicted less BP but not PTSD symptoms, with event centrality buffering the impact of CM. Findings highlight the potential utility of narrative identity theory, particularly AR, in understanding and treating BPD in the context of childhood maltreatment.

根据叙事认同理论,童年事件在一个人的生活故事中的意义和重要性(即自传式推理[AR])可能有助于解释为什么只有一些经历过童年虐待(CM)的人会发展成边缘型人格(BP)病理。我们通过研究AR是否与童年情感经历有关,特别是感知事件中心性和意义制造,以及CM与BP症状、BP特征和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状之间的中度关系,对这一假设进行了检验,这些样本包括216名既往有心理健康诊断的年轻女性。参与者写下童年负面情绪事件的回忆,给每个回忆的中心程度打分,并描述这些事件在他们人生故事中的意义。较低的事件中心性和积极的意义制造预测较低的BP,但不预测PTSD症状,事件中心性缓冲CM的影响。研究结果强调了叙事认同理论,特别是AR,在理解和治疗儿童期虐待背景下的BPD方面的潜在效用。
{"title":"Childhood Maltreatment and Borderline Personality Pathology Among Young Women: The Buffering Role of Autobiographical Reasoning About Childhood Experiences.","authors":"Stephanie Milan, Mariah Xu, Ana Luisa Barbosa Dau, Adenique Lisse","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2025.39.4.285","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2025.39.4.285","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to narrative identity theory, the meaning and importance given to childhood events within one's life story (i.e., autobiographical reasoning [AR]) may help explain why only some individuals who experience childhood maltreatment (CM) develop borderline personality (BP) pathology. We test this hypothesis by examining whether AR about childhood emotional experiences, particularly perceived event centrality and meaning-making, moderate relations between CM and BP symptoms, BP traits, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in a diverse sample of 216 young women with a previous mental health diagnosis. Participants wrote recollections of negative emotional childhood events, rated the centrality of each recollection, and described the meaning of these events in their life story. Lower event centrality and positive meaning-making predicted less BP but not PTSD symptoms, with event centrality buffering the impact of CM. Findings highlight the potential utility of narrative identity theory, particularly AR, in understanding and treating BPD in the context of childhood maltreatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"39 4","pages":"285-301"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144785635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Sociocultural Context of Borderline Traits. 边缘特征的社会文化背景。
IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2025.39.4.320
Breanna J Rogers, Blair E Wisco, Rosemery O Nelson-Gray

Research has shown racial differences in borderline personality disorder trait presentation between diagnosed Black women and White women. However, no studies have examined if these differences were generalizable to men and individuals with lower borderline severity. We sought to examine how gender and race affected the presentation of borderline traits across the severity continuum. Participants (n = 196) answered a series of surveys examining comorbid externalizing and internalizing traits. Differences were mostly nonsignificant with few exceptions. Higher physical aggression was observed among Black than among White participants. Gender differences also emerged with higher overall and physical aggression observed among men, and higher rejection sensitivity observed among women. Borderline trait severity was significantly associated with most internalizing and externalizing traits across all racial and gender groups. Our findings suggest a need for more diverse sampling in borderline research to fully capture the extent to which its various mechanisms manifest.

研究表明,在被诊断为边缘型人格障碍的黑人女性和白人女性之间,边缘型人格障碍的特征表现存在种族差异。然而,没有研究检查这些差异是否可以推广到男性和较低边缘严重程度的个体。我们试图研究性别和种族如何影响整个严重程度连续体的边缘特征的表现。参与者(n = 196)回答了一系列检查共病的外化和内化特征的调查。除了少数例外,差异大多不显著。黑人参与者的身体攻击性高于白人参与者。性别差异还表现为男性总体攻击性和身体攻击性更高,而女性的排斥敏感性更高。在所有种族和性别群体中,边缘特征的严重程度与大多数内化和外化特征显著相关。我们的研究结果表明,在边界研究中需要更多样化的采样,以充分捕捉其各种机制表现的程度。
{"title":"The Sociocultural Context of Borderline Traits.","authors":"Breanna J Rogers, Blair E Wisco, Rosemery O Nelson-Gray","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2025.39.4.320","DOIUrl":"10.1521/pedi.2025.39.4.320","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research has shown racial differences in borderline personality disorder trait presentation between diagnosed Black women and White women. However, no studies have examined if these differences were generalizable to men and individuals with lower borderline severity. We sought to examine how gender and race affected the presentation of borderline traits across the severity continuum. Participants (<i>n</i> = 196) answered a series of surveys examining comorbid externalizing and internalizing traits. Differences were mostly nonsignificant with few exceptions. Higher physical aggression was observed among Black than among White participants. Gender differences also emerged with higher overall and physical aggression observed among men, and higher rejection sensitivity observed among women. Borderline trait severity was significantly associated with most internalizing and externalizing traits across all racial and gender groups. Our findings suggest a need for more diverse sampling in borderline research to fully capture the extent to which its various mechanisms manifest.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"39 4","pages":"320-335"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144785649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of an At-Risk Personality Profile for (In)Direct Self-Harm Engagement in Older Age. 老年人直接自残行为的风险人格特征的发展。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2025.39.3.240
Lisa Van Hove, Morag Facon, Imke Baetens, Steven Vanderstichelen, Eva Dierckx, Sebastiaan P J van Alphen, Lara Stas, Gina Rossi

Across the lifespan, suicide mortality rates are highest among older adults, yet research on self-harm in later life remains limited. This study explores how self-reported maladaptive personality traits (measured by the PID-5-BF+M) are associated with self-harm in older adults, and whether there are potential differences according to the type of self-harm behaviors (indirect, direct, and the co-occurrence of these two) in this age group. From a convenience sample of 790 adults aged 60 years and older, 102 participants were selected using a matched-pair design. Regression models showed that three personality domains (i.e., Negative Affectivity, Antagonism, and Psychoticism) and eight personality facets were related with self-harm in older adults. Boxplots showed differences between maladaptive personality scores depending on self-harm type. Presence of elevated PID-5-BF+M scores may help clinicians identify elevated self-harm risk in older adults. Future research should differentiate between types of self-harm, as the associated risk factors may vary.

纵观一生,老年人的自杀死亡率最高,但对晚年自残的研究仍然有限。本研究探讨了自我报告的适应不良人格特征(由PID-5-BF+M测量)与老年人自残之间的关系,以及在该年龄组中,自残行为类型(间接、直接以及两者共存)是否存在潜在差异。从790名年龄在60岁及以上的成年人中,使用配对设计选择了102名参与者。回归模型显示,老年人的3个人格域(负性情感、对抗性和精神性)和8个人格层面与自我伤害相关。箱形图显示了不同自残类型的适应不良人格得分的差异。存在较高的PID-5-BF+M评分可以帮助临床医生识别老年人较高的自残风险。未来的研究应该区分不同类型的自残,因为相关的风险因素可能会有所不同。
{"title":"Development of an At-Risk Personality Profile for (In)Direct Self-Harm Engagement in Older Age.","authors":"Lisa Van Hove, Morag Facon, Imke Baetens, Steven Vanderstichelen, Eva Dierckx, Sebastiaan P J van Alphen, Lara Stas, Gina Rossi","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2025.39.3.240","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2025.39.3.240","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Across the lifespan, suicide mortality rates are highest among older adults, yet research on self-harm in later life remains limited. This study explores how self-reported maladaptive personality traits (measured by the PID-5-BF+M) are associated with self-harm in older adults, and whether there are potential differences according to the type of self-harm behaviors (indirect, direct, and the co-occurrence of these two) in this age group. From a convenience sample of 790 adults aged 60 years and older, 102 participants were selected using a matched-pair design. Regression models showed that three personality domains (i.e., Negative Affectivity, Antagonism, and Psychoticism) and eight personality facets were related with self-harm in older adults. Boxplots showed differences between maladaptive personality scores depending on self-harm type. Presence of elevated PID-5-BF+M scores may help clinicians identify elevated self-harm risk in older adults. Future research should differentiate between types of self-harm, as the associated risk factors may vary.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"39 3","pages":"240-262"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144276338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0: Factor Structure and Clinical Cutoffs. 人格功能水平量表-简表2.0:因素结构与临床截止点。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2025.39.3.185
Tongyao Ran, Kennedy M Balzen, Sophie Kerr, Joost Hutsebaut, Carla Sharp

The Alternative Model for Personality Disorders identifies the level of personality functioning (LPF) as the entry criterion for personality disorder. The Level of Personality Functioning-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0) has demonstrated adequate psychometric properties, although mixed evidence on its factor structure and the lack of established clinical cutoffs limit its utility. In the present study, we first examined the factor structure of the LPFS-BF 2.0 using data from 365 young adults. Next, we examined the measure's convergent and discriminant validity, clinical utility, and cutoff score in a mixed college (n = 94) and clinical (n = 70) sample. Results revealed acceptable fit of a bifactor model with an essentially unidimensional structure and general support for convergent and discriminant validity. The LPFS-BF 2.0 distinguished those above versus below the clinical cutoff of the Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning with strong sensitivity and specificity. The LPFS-BF 2.0 appears psychometrically sound and clinically useful in capturing personality dysfunction.

人格障碍的替代模型确定人格功能水平(LPF)作为人格障碍的进入标准。人格功能水平简表2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0)已经显示出足够的心理测量特性,尽管关于其因素结构的混合证据和缺乏既定的临床截止点限制了它的效用。在本研究中,我们首先使用365名年轻人的数据来检测LPFS-BF 2.0的因素结构。接下来,我们在混合大学(n = 94)和临床(n = 70)样本中检验了该措施的收敛效度和判别效度,临床效用和截止分数。结果表明,双因子模型具有良好的拟合性,具有基本的一维结构,并普遍支持收敛效度和判别效度。LPFS-BF 2.0区分了半结构化人格功能访谈的临床截止点以上和以下的人,具有很强的敏感性和特异性。LPFS-BF 2.0在心理测量学上是合理的,在捕捉人格功能障碍方面临床上是有用的。
{"title":"Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0: Factor Structure and Clinical Cutoffs.","authors":"Tongyao Ran, Kennedy M Balzen, Sophie Kerr, Joost Hutsebaut, Carla Sharp","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2025.39.3.185","DOIUrl":"10.1521/pedi.2025.39.3.185","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Alternative Model for Personality Disorders identifies the level of personality functioning (LPF) as the entry criterion for personality disorder. The Level of Personality Functioning-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0) has demonstrated adequate psychometric properties, although mixed evidence on its factor structure and the lack of established clinical cutoffs limit its utility. In the present study, we first examined the factor structure of the LPFS-BF 2.0 using data from 365 young adults. Next, we examined the measure's convergent and discriminant validity, clinical utility, and cutoff score in a mixed college (<i>n</i> = 94) and clinical (<i>n</i> = 70) sample. Results revealed acceptable fit of a bifactor model with an essentially unidimensional structure and general support for convergent and discriminant validity. The LPFS-BF 2.0 distinguished those above versus below the clinical cutoff of the Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning with strong sensitivity and specificity. The LPFS-BF 2.0 appears psychometrically sound and clinically useful in capturing personality dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"39 3","pages":"185-205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144276341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring Pathological Narcissism Within the ICD-11 Model of Personality Disorders Among Croatian Psychiatric Patients. 在克罗地亚精神病患者人格障碍的ICD-11模型中探索病理性自恋。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2025.39.3.206
Nenad Jakšić, Ivona Šimunović Filipčić, Marina Šagud, Igor Filipčić, Wei Wang, Darko Marčinko

We aimed to investigate the relationships of ICD-11 personality disorder (PD) severity and five maladaptive personality domains with narcissistic grandiosity and narcissistic vulnerability among 398 Croatian adult psychiatric patients. They completed the following self-report questionnaires: the ICD-11 Personality Disorder Severity Scale, the Personality Assessment Questionnaire for ICD-11, and the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Narcissistic grandiosity showed meaningful associations with the Disinhibition and Anankastia domains. Conversely, narcissistic vulnerability was significantly more strongly associated with PD severity and the Negative Affectivity domain, and it also showed meaningful associations with the Disinhibition, Anankastia, and Dissociality domains. An even more nuanced picture emerged on the facet-level of pathological narcissism, while some novel findings were obtained pertaining to gender differences in the above-mentioned relations. Future studies utilizing additional multidimensional measures of pathological narcissism and gender-sensitive assessment are warranted.

本研究旨在探讨398名克罗地亚成年精神病患者的ICD-11人格障碍(PD)严重程度与自恋性浮夸性和自恋性脆弱性五个适应不良人格域的关系。他们完成了以下自我报告问卷:ICD-11人格障碍严重程度量表、ICD-11人格评估问卷和病理性自恋量表。自恋型浮夸与去抑制和焦虑域有显著关联。相反,自恋型脆弱性与PD严重程度和负性情感域的相关性更强,并且与去抑制、焦虑和分离性域也有显著的相关性。在病理性自恋的层面上出现了更微妙的图景,同时在上述关系的性别差异方面获得了一些新的发现。未来的研究需要利用额外的多维度测量病理自恋和性别敏感评估。
{"title":"Exploring Pathological Narcissism Within the <i>ICD-11</i> Model of Personality Disorders Among Croatian Psychiatric Patients.","authors":"Nenad Jakšić, Ivona Šimunović Filipčić, Marina Šagud, Igor Filipčić, Wei Wang, Darko Marčinko","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2025.39.3.206","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2025.39.3.206","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to investigate the relationships of <i>ICD-11</i> personality disorder (PD) severity and five maladaptive personality domains with narcissistic grandiosity and narcissistic vulnerability among 398 Croatian adult psychiatric patients. They completed the following self-report questionnaires: the <i>ICD-11</i> Personality Disorder Severity Scale, the Personality Assessment Questionnaire for <i>ICD-11,</i> and the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Narcissistic grandiosity showed meaningful associations with the Disinhibition and Anankastia domains. Conversely, narcissistic vulnerability was significantly more strongly associated with PD severity and the Negative Affectivity domain, and it also showed meaningful associations with the Disinhibition, Anankastia, and Dissociality domains. An even more nuanced picture emerged on the facet-level of pathological narcissism, while some novel findings were obtained pertaining to gender differences in the above-mentioned relations. Future studies utilizing additional multidimensional measures of pathological narcissism and gender-sensitive assessment are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"39 3","pages":"206-222"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144276339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Internal Structure and Consistency of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 人格功能水平量表的内部结构与一致性:系统回顾与元分析。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2025.39.3.223
Luis Hualparuca-Olivera, Elsa Vigo-Ayasta, Julio Torales, Cristian Ramos-Vera, Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Margarita Calle-Arancibia, Agueda Muñoz-Del-Carpio-Toia, Antonio Ventriglio, Bo Bach

The present systematic review and meta-analysis sought to assess the internal structure and consistency of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0) across different populations and cultures. Studies identified through systematic research were subjected to eligibility criteria, resulting in 30 included studies and 110 effect sizes. Study characteristics were tabulated, their methodological quality was assessed, and findings were synthesized using a random-effects meta-analysis. Findings overall supported the internal structure of the LPFS-BF 2.0 and indicated sound internal consistency for the total scale. Moderator analyses indicated that internal consistency differed minimally by index type, sample type, gender, age, country, and language. The findings overall suggest that the LPFS-BF 2.0 assesses a coherent and internally consistent construct, making it a potentially useful tool for evaluating personality functioning across diverse populations. Future investigations should further explore interrater reliability, test-retest stability, and alignment with interview-based personality disorder severity.

本研究旨在对人格功能水平量表-简易表格2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0)在不同人群和文化中的内部结构和一致性进行系统评价和荟萃分析。通过系统研究确定的研究受到资格标准的约束,产生30个纳入研究和110个效应量。将研究特征制成表格,对其方法学质量进行评估,并使用随机效应荟萃分析对研究结果进行综合。研究结果总体上支持LPFS-BF 2.0的内部结构,并表明总量表的内部一致性良好。调节分析表明,内部一致性在指数类型、样本类型、性别、年龄、国家和语言之间的差异极小。总的来说,研究结果表明,LPFS-BF 2.0评估的是一个连贯的、内部一致的结构,这使它成为评估不同人群人格功能的潜在有用工具。未来的研究应进一步探讨互测者的信度、重测稳定性以及与基于访谈的人格障碍严重程度的一致性。
{"title":"Internal Structure and Consistency of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Luis Hualparuca-Olivera, Elsa Vigo-Ayasta, Julio Torales, Cristian Ramos-Vera, Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Margarita Calle-Arancibia, Agueda Muñoz-Del-Carpio-Toia, Antonio Ventriglio, Bo Bach","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2025.39.3.223","DOIUrl":"10.1521/pedi.2025.39.3.223","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present systematic review and meta-analysis sought to assess the internal structure and consistency of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0) across different populations and cultures. Studies identified through systematic research were subjected to eligibility criteria, resulting in 30 included studies and 110 effect sizes. Study characteristics were tabulated, their methodological quality was assessed, and findings were synthesized using a random-effects meta-analysis. Findings overall supported the internal structure of the LPFS-BF 2.0 and indicated sound internal consistency for the total scale. Moderator analyses indicated that internal consistency differed minimally by index type, sample type, gender, age, country, and language. The findings overall suggest that the LPFS-BF 2.0 assesses a coherent and internally consistent construct, making it a potentially useful tool for evaluating personality functioning across diverse populations. Future investigations should further explore interrater reliability, test-retest stability, and alignment with interview-based personality disorder severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"39 3","pages":"223-239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144276340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Integrating Perspectives of Patients, Their Significant Others, and Therapists on Recovery From Personality Disorders: A Mixed-Methods Study. 整合患者、他们的重要他人和治疗师对人格障碍康复的观点:一项混合方法研究。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2025.39.2.152
Johanna W van den Eshof, Kim de Bruijn, Anna Bartak, Udo W Nabitz, Henricus L Van, Rosa A van Grieken

Patients with personality disorders (PDs) often struggle in life after treatment, even when symptomatic remission is achieved. The question arises of whether current outcome measurements are relevant for patients and people around them. To address this, we used concept mapping, a mixed-method approach, to construct a framework of recovery from the perspectives of patients, their significant others, and therapists (n = 39). Participants brainstormed what recovery involved and then prioritied and clustered these ideas (n = 61). Data were analyzed using multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis, resulting in 45 statements grouped into four themes: understanding and recognizing yourself, regulating emotions, giving direction to your life, and connecting with others. Understanding and recognizing yourself was identified as the most important area of change. This study offers an evidence-based framework for recovery in PD, providing a foundation for developing outcome measurements that reflect the needs of patients and their significant others beyond symptom reduction.

人格障碍(pd)患者在治疗后常常在生活中挣扎,即使症状得到缓解。问题是,当前的结果测量是否与患者及其周围的人相关。为了解决这个问题,我们使用了概念映射,一种混合方法,从患者、他们的重要他人和治疗师的角度构建了一个康复框架(n = 39)。参与者对恢复涉及的内容进行头脑风暴,然后对这些想法进行优先排序和集中(n = 61)。使用多维尺度和分层聚类分析对数据进行分析,得出45个陈述,分为四个主题:理解和认识自己,调节情绪,为生活指明方向,以及与他人联系。了解和认识自己被认为是最重要的改变领域。这项研究为帕金森病的康复提供了一个基于证据的框架,为发展反映患者及其重要他人的需求的结果测量提供了基础。
{"title":"Integrating Perspectives of Patients, Their Significant Others, and Therapists on Recovery From Personality Disorders: A Mixed-Methods Study.","authors":"Johanna W van den Eshof, Kim de Bruijn, Anna Bartak, Udo W Nabitz, Henricus L Van, Rosa A van Grieken","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2025.39.2.152","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2025.39.2.152","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with personality disorders (PDs) often struggle in life after treatment, even when symptomatic remission is achieved. The question arises of whether current outcome measurements are relevant for patients and people around them. To address this, we used concept mapping, a mixed-method approach, to construct a framework of recovery from the perspectives of patients, their significant others, and therapists (<i>n</i> = 39). Participants brainstormed what recovery involved and then prioritied and clustered these ideas (<i>n</i> = 61). Data were analyzed using multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis, resulting in 45 statements grouped into four themes: understanding and recognizing yourself, regulating emotions, giving direction to your life, and connecting with others. Understanding and recognizing yourself was identified as the most important area of change. This study offers an evidence-based framework for recovery in PD, providing a foundation for developing outcome measurements that reflect the needs of patients and their significant others beyond symptom reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"39 2","pages":"152-169"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144052795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ketamine-Assisted Psychotherapy for Treatment of Co-occurring Borderline Personality Disorder and Depression: A Case Study. 氯胺酮辅助心理疗法治疗边缘型人格障碍和抑郁症:个案研究。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2025.39.2.170
Albert Yeung, Michael Alpert, David Mischoulon

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a mental health condition characterized by a pervasive pattern of impulsivity, affective dysregulation, and cognitive-perceptual symptoms. Treatment of BPD remains a significant challenge to mental health clinicians. People who suffer from BPD frequently have comorbid psychiatric disorders, which makes treatment more complex. This case study describes a course of ketamine-assisted psychotherapy (KAP) to treat a patient with co-occurring BPD and depression. KAP uses the antidepressant and psychedelic effects of ketamine embedded in a psychotherapy format to utilize the concept of an inner healing intelligence within the patient and the intersubjective relationship between patient and therapist as therapeutic factors. The positive outcomes in this case study suggest that more systematic research is warranted in the use of KAP for treatment of BPD and other personality disorders.

边缘型人格障碍(BPD)是一种以普遍的冲动、情感失调和认知知觉症状为特征的精神健康状况。BPD的治疗仍然是心理健康临床医生面临的一个重大挑战。患有BPD的人经常伴有精神疾病,这使得治疗更加复杂。本案例研究描述了一个氯胺酮辅助心理治疗(KAP)的过程,以治疗合并BPD和抑郁症的患者。KAP将氯胺酮的抗抑郁和致幻剂作用嵌入到心理治疗中,利用患者的内在愈合智力概念以及患者和治疗师之间的主体间关系作为治疗因素。本案例研究的积极结果表明,在使用KAP治疗BPD和其他人格障碍方面需要进行更系统的研究。
{"title":"Ketamine-Assisted Psychotherapy for Treatment of Co-occurring Borderline Personality Disorder and Depression: A Case Study.","authors":"Albert Yeung, Michael Alpert, David Mischoulon","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2025.39.2.170","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2025.39.2.170","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a mental health condition characterized by a pervasive pattern of impulsivity, affective dysregulation, and cognitive-perceptual symptoms. Treatment of BPD remains a significant challenge to mental health clinicians. People who suffer from BPD frequently have comorbid psychiatric disorders, which makes treatment more complex. This case study describes a course of ketamine-assisted psychotherapy (KAP) to treat a patient with co-occurring BPD and depression. KAP uses the antidepressant and psychedelic effects of ketamine embedded in a psychotherapy format to utilize the concept of an inner healing intelligence within the patient and the intersubjective relationship between patient and therapist as therapeutic factors. The positive outcomes in this case study suggest that more systematic research is warranted in the use of KAP for treatment of BPD and other personality disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"39 2","pages":"170-184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144054586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Personality Disorders
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1