Current Opinion in Psychology最新文献

英文中文

The colonial past and/in history textbooks: A literature review 殖民历史与历史教科书：文献综述

IF 6.9 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Current Opinion in Psychology

Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102264

Karel Van Nieuwenhuyse , Denise Bentrovato , Joaquim Pires Valentim

This study analyses, through a systematic literature review, research conducted on the colonial past and/in history textbooks, drawing on 44 studies published since 2015. Prompted by renewed global attention to colonial legacies, the review focuses on secondary school history textbooks addressing overseas European modern imperialism. Using a systematic search complemented by snowball sampling, three main research foci were identified: analyses of textbook representations of modern imperialism, investigations into how such representations are used and received in classrooms, and meta-analyses of textbook representations of modern imperialism. Half of the studies examined textbook accounts from former colonizing countries, while the other half focused on textbooks from former colonies or other countries. Two thirds of the studies were situated within the disciplines of history and history education, followed by social psychology and postcolonial studies. All studies employed qualitative methods (some also quantitative) involving textual analysis, often informed by postcolonial perspectives, while explicit methodological transparency was lacking in one third of them. The findings from the 44 studies reveal a persistent resistance to postcolonial transformation in textbooks from former colonizing countries, despite some textbooks showing incremental shifts. By contrast, textbooks from former colonies more frequently offer explicitly critical, anti-imperial narratives that connect past injustices to contemporary forms of neocolonialism and present-day inequalities, though these accounts also reproduce simplifications and binary oppositions. Across contexts, textbooks continue to mirror national memory cultures more than academic historiography. Nevertheless, emerging innovative materials, committed teachers and experimental pedagogies illustrate the potential for more decolonial, inclusive approaches to teaching the colonial past.

本研究通过系统的文献综述，分析了对殖民历史和历史教科书的研究，并借鉴了自2015年以来发表的44项研究。在全球重新关注殖民主义遗产的背景下，此次审查将重点放在论述海外欧洲近代帝国主义的中学历史教科书上。通过系统的搜索和滚雪球抽样，我们确定了三个主要的研究重点：分析现代帝国主义的教科书表征，调查这些表征在课堂上是如何使用和接受的，以及对现代帝国主义教科书表征的元分析。一半的研究调查了来自前殖民地国家的教科书，另一半研究了来自前殖民地或其他国家的教科书。三分之二的研究属于历史和历史教育学科，其次是社会心理学和后殖民研究。所有研究都采用定性方法（有些也采用定量方法），包括文本分析，通常以后殖民观点为依据，而三分之一的研究缺乏明确的方法透明度。44项研究的结果表明，尽管一些教科书显示出渐进的转变，但前殖民国家的教科书对后殖民转型的抵制依然存在。相比之下，来自前殖民地的教科书更频繁地提供明确的批判性、反帝国主义的叙述，将过去的不公正与当代形式的新殖民主义和当今的不平等联系起来，尽管这些叙述也再现了简化和二元对立。在不同的背景下，教科书继续比学术史学更能反映民族记忆文化。然而，新兴的创新材料、敬业的教师和实验教学法表明，在教授殖民历史方面，有可能采用更加非殖民化、包容性更强的方法。

{"title":"The colonial past and/in history textbooks: A literature review","authors":"Karel Van Nieuwenhuyse , Denise Bentrovato , Joaquim Pires Valentim","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102264","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102264","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study analyses, through a systematic literature review, research conducted on the colonial past and/in history textbooks, drawing on 44 studies published since 2015. Prompted by renewed global attention to colonial legacies, the review focuses on secondary school history textbooks addressing overseas European modern imperialism. Using a systematic search complemented by snowball sampling, three main research foci were identified: analyses of textbook representations of modern imperialism, investigations into how such representations are used and received in classrooms, and meta-analyses of textbook representations of modern imperialism. Half of the studies examined textbook accounts from former colonizing countries, while the other half focused on textbooks from former colonies or other countries. Two thirds of the studies were situated within the disciplines of history and history education, followed by social psychology and postcolonial studies. All studies employed qualitative methods (some also quantitative) involving textual analysis, often informed by postcolonial perspectives, while explicit methodological transparency was lacking in one third of them. The findings from the 44 studies reveal a persistent resistance to postcolonial transformation in textbooks from former colonizing countries, despite some textbooks showing incremental shifts. By contrast, textbooks from former colonies more frequently offer explicitly critical, anti-imperial narratives that connect past injustices to contemporary forms of neocolonialism and present-day inequalities, though these accounts also reproduce simplifications and binary oppositions. Across contexts, textbooks continue to mirror national memory cultures more than academic historiography. Nevertheless, emerging innovative materials, committed teachers and experimental pedagogies illustrate the potential for more decolonial, inclusive approaches to teaching the colonial past.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 102264"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145962538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The role of epistemic drift in online civic discourse about science 认知漂移在网络公民科学话语中的作用

IF 6.9 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Current Opinion in Psychology

Pub Date : 2026-01-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2026.102266

Stephan Lewandowsky , David Garcia

Our societies are experiencing an epistemic drift, that is a changing understanding of what it means to be “honest” and how to arrive at “truth”. This drift has increasingly replaced reliance on evidence and facts during truth-seeking with reliance on beliefs, feelings, and intuitions alone. This is especially important in civic discourse about science, which by its very nature relies on evidence over intuition and feelings. We posit that the role of epistemic drift in civic discourse about science is observable in online discussions and can be analyzed through their digital traces. Building on observational and experimental work, we propose a model in which epistemic drift fuels low-quality information sharing through its interplay with emotions. In this view, epistemic drift also drives online toxicity, which creates apparent polarization and erodes the quality of online civic discourse on scientific topics like health and climate change.

我们的社会正在经历一种认知的漂移，即对什么是“诚实”以及如何达到“真相”的理解正在发生变化。在寻求真理的过程中，这种趋势越来越多地取代了对证据和事实的依赖，取而代之的是对信念、感觉和直觉的依赖。这在关于科学的公民话语中尤其重要，因为科学的本质依赖于证据而不是直觉和感觉。我们假设，在在线讨论中可以观察到关于科学的公民话语中的认知漂移的作用，并且可以通过它们的数字痕迹进行分析。在观察和实验工作的基础上，我们提出了一个模型，其中认知漂移通过与情绪的相互作用来促进低质量的信息共享。这种观点认为，认知漂移还会导致网络中毒，造成明显的两极分化，并侵蚀在线公民讨论健康和气候变化等科学话题的质量。

引用次数: 0

Therapy chatbots and emotional complexity: do therapy chatbots really empathise? 治疗聊天机器人和情感复杂性：治疗聊天机器人真的有同理心吗？

IF 6.9 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Current Opinion in Psychology

Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102263

Katleen Gabriels, Kris Goffin

Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) and, more specific, therapy chatbots are at the heart of this article. We review studies about therapy chatbots in terms of risks, benefits, and ‘empathetic design’. Research shows that these chatbots can relieve symptoms of stress, depression, and anxiety, by tracking emotions over time, encouraging self-reflection, and helping to gain insight into cognitive biases, among other things. However, several studies focus on the short term, have limited samples, and include self-report. While there are certainly benefits, risks such as privacy, data security, and a lack of human oversight, cannot be ignored. The increasing use of LLMs like ChatGPT as ‘AI therapist’ intensifies these concerns. The need for social connection might increase the tendency to anthropomorphise, and users risk becoming emotionally dependent on them. Developers claim that therapy chatbots such as Youper are ‘empathetic’ and recent studies indeed indicate that informants prefer written AI responses over human therapists' written responses in terms of empathy. Although therapy chatbots and LLMs lack affective and motivational empathy, they can express elements of cognitive empathy. Nonetheless, we contend that we should avoid attributing human characteristics such as ‘empathy’ to AI, because the risks of manipulation and dependency are too high.

基于互联网的认知行为疗法（iCBT），更具体地说，治疗聊天机器人是本文的核心。我们从风险、收益和“移情设计”方面回顾了有关治疗聊天机器人的研究。研究表明，这些聊天机器人可以通过长期跟踪情绪、鼓励自我反思、帮助洞察认知偏见等方式，缓解压力、抑郁和焦虑的症状。然而，一些研究集中在短期，样本有限，并包括自我报告。虽然肯定有好处，但隐私、数据安全和缺乏人为监督等风险也不容忽视。ChatGPT等法学硕士越来越多地被用作“人工智能治疗师”，加剧了这些担忧。对社会联系的需求可能会增加拟人化的倾向，用户可能会在情感上依赖于他们。开发人员声称，像Youper这样的治疗聊天机器人是“有同理心的”，最近的研究确实表明，在同理心方面，与人类治疗师的书面回复相比，被调查者更喜欢人工智能的书面回复。虽然治疗聊天机器人和法学硕士缺乏情感和动机共情，但它们可以表达认知共情的元素。尽管如此，我们认为我们应该避免将“同理心”等人类特征归因于人工智能，因为操纵和依赖的风险太高了。

{"title":"Therapy chatbots and emotional complexity: do therapy chatbots really empathise?","authors":"Katleen Gabriels, Kris Goffin","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102263","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102263","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) and, more specific, therapy chatbots are at the heart of this article. We review studies about therapy chatbots in terms of risks, benefits, and ‘empathetic design’. Research shows that these chatbots can relieve symptoms of stress, depression, and anxiety, by tracking emotions over time, encouraging self-reflection, and helping to gain insight into cognitive biases, among other things. However, several studies focus on the short term, have limited samples, and include self-report. While there are certainly benefits, risks such as privacy, data security, and a lack of human oversight, cannot be ignored. The increasing use of LLMs like ChatGPT as ‘AI therapist’ intensifies these concerns. The need for social connection might increase the tendency to anthropomorphise, and users risk becoming emotionally dependent on them. Developers claim that therapy chatbots such as Youper are ‘empathetic’ and recent studies indeed indicate that informants prefer written AI responses over human therapists' written responses in terms of empathy. Although therapy chatbots and LLMs lack affective and motivational empathy, they can express elements of cognitive empathy. Nonetheless, we contend that we should avoid attributing human characteristics such as ‘empathy’ to AI, because the risks of manipulation and dependency are too high.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 102263"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145968495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Multicultural turn in psychotherapy: A philosophical and ethical reckoning 心理治疗的多元文化转向：哲学和伦理的清算

IF 6.9 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Current Opinion in Psychology

Pub Date : 2026-01-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102265

Joy Hutchinson , Cris May

The multicultural and social justice counseling (MSJC) movement has become a defining paradigm in psychotherapy, shaping ethics, training, and practice. While this evolution reflects important strides toward equity and inclusion, it also introduces philosophical tensions, particularly concerning ideological conformity, epistemological overreach, and the marginalization of empirically supported treatments such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). This critical position paper examines how Freirean and decolonial frameworks have transformed multiculturalism from a supplemental lens into a dominant moral narrative, often challenging client autonomy and therapeutic neutrality. Through an ethical and philosophical analysis, the paper highlights the risks of conflating advocacy with clinical practice and calls for a recommitment to pluralism, client-centered care, and evidence-based modalities. Psychotherapists must strike a balance between cultural responsiveness and foundational counseling values, including empathy, respect, and autonomy, to maintain ethical integrity and professional credibility in an increasingly polarized landscape.

多元文化和社会正义咨询（MSJC）运动已经成为心理治疗的一个定义范例，塑造了伦理、培训和实践。虽然这种演变反映了公平和包容的重要进步，但它也带来了哲学上的紧张，特别是在意识形态的一致性、认识论的过度延伸以及经验支持的治疗方法（如认知行为疗法（CBT））的边缘化方面。这篇重要的立场论文探讨了自由主义和非殖民主义框架如何将多元文化主义从一个补充镜头转变为一个占主导地位的道德叙事，经常挑战来访者的自主权和治疗的中立性。通过伦理和哲学分析，本文强调了将倡导与临床实践混为一谈的风险，并呼吁重新致力于多元化、以客户为中心的护理和以证据为基础的模式。心理治疗师必须在文化响应和基本咨询价值之间取得平衡，包括移情、尊重和自主，以在日益两极分化的环境中保持道德诚信和专业信誉。

{"title":"The Multicultural turn in psychotherapy: A philosophical and ethical reckoning","authors":"Joy Hutchinson , Cris May","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102265","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102265","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The multicultural and social justice counseling (MSJC) movement has become a defining paradigm in psychotherapy, shaping ethics, training, and practice. While this evolution reflects important strides toward equity and inclusion, it also introduces philosophical tensions, particularly concerning ideological conformity, epistemological overreach, and the marginalization of empirically supported treatments such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). This critical position paper examines how Freirean and decolonial frameworks have transformed multiculturalism from a supplemental lens into a dominant moral narrative, often challenging client autonomy and therapeutic neutrality. Through an ethical and philosophical analysis, the paper highlights the risks of conflating advocacy with clinical practice and calls for a recommitment to pluralism, client-centered care, and evidence-based modalities. Psychotherapists must strike a balance between cultural responsiveness and foundational counseling values, including empathy, respect, and autonomy, to maintain ethical integrity and professional credibility in an increasingly polarized landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 102265"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145968490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Accumulation of violence and victimisation: Why it matters to measure broadly and account for different harm types 暴力和受害的积累：为什么广泛衡量和计算不同类型的伤害很重要

IF 6.9 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Current Opinion in Psychology

Pub Date : 2026-01-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102260

Lottie G. Harris, Dhatsayini Rattambige, Gabrielle R. Hunt, Daryl J. Higgins

We explore how researchers have focused on the accumulation of harm. We then provide some examples, drawing on the comprehensive study of a nationally representative sample—the Australian Child Maltreatment Study—to understand the prevalence, impact, and value of measuring and analysing multiple forms of harm. First, we examine maltreatment intensity in care-experienced individuals and how that helps explain the links to long-term mental health outcomes. We then explore how multiple advertises in children's environment increases the risk of alcohol use problems in young adults. We then explore the higher rates of multi-type maltreatment in sexuality and gender diverse Australians. Finally, we look at how focusing just on sexual harm from adults misses important victimisation experiences: understanding sexual harassment and harmful sexual behaviour from peers.

我们将探讨研究人员如何关注危害的累积。然后，我们提供了一些例子，借鉴了一个具有全国代表性的样本的综合研究——澳大利亚儿童虐待研究——来了解测量和分析多种形式的伤害的普遍性、影响和价值。首先，我们检查了有过虐待经历的个体的虐待强度，以及这如何有助于解释与长期精神健康结果的联系。然后，我们探讨了儿童环境中的多重广告如何增加年轻人饮酒问题的风险。然后，我们探讨了性取向和性别多样化的澳大利亚人的多类型虐待率较高的原因。最后，我们看一下仅仅关注成年人的性伤害是如何忽略了重要的受害者经历：理解来自同龄人的性骚扰和有害的性行为。

引用次数: 0

Betrayal and punishment within intimate relationships 亲密关系中的背叛和惩罚。

IF 6.9 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Current Opinion in Psychology

Pub Date : 2026-01-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102262

Julie Fitness, Trevor I. Case

This paper presents a social-cognitive model of betrayal and punishment within intimate relationships. The nature of betrayal as a perceived violation of relationship rules is discussed, along with betrayed partners’ attributions about betrayer culpability. The roles of anger, hurt, jealousy, and shame in motivating vengeful impulses are noted, and direct and indirect partner punishments are described. Factors that predispose betrayed partners to impose severe punishments are discussed, including dysfunctional beliefs and expectations; harsh, partner-blaming attributions; and personality characteristics including trait entitlement and narcissism, justice sensitivity, spitefulness, sadism, trait anger, and trait contempt. The role of hate in motivating partner harm is also discussed. The paper concludes with model-derived suggestions for further research on intimate partner betrayal and punishment.

本文提出了亲密关系中背叛和惩罚的社会认知模型。本文讨论了背叛作为一种对关系规则的感知违反的本质，以及被背叛的伴侣对背叛者罪责的归因。注意到愤怒、伤害、嫉妒和羞耻在激发报复冲动中的作用，并描述了直接和间接的伴侣惩罚。本文还讨论了导致背叛伴侣施加严厉惩罚的因素，包括不正常的信念和期望；苛责伴侣的归因；人格特征包括特质权利和自恋，正义敏感，恶意，虐待狂，特质愤怒和特质轻蔑。仇恨在激励伴侣伤害中的作用也进行了讨论。最后，本文对亲密伴侣背叛与惩罚的进一步研究提出了模型推导的建议。

引用次数: 0

Rethinking “religion” and “science” to cultivate mutual trust in the United States 重新思考“宗教”和“科学”，在美国培养互信

IF 6.9 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Current Opinion in Psychology

Pub Date : 2025-12-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102254

Kimberly Rios , Cameron D. Mackey

In many Western societies such as the United States, “science” is considered a polarizing and controversial topic along political and religious lines. Although religious and politically conservative individuals are generally less trusting of science than non-religious and politically liberal individuals, we argue that there are more nuances to religion, science, and the religion-science relationship than is typically assumed. Stereotyping religious individuals as “anti-science” and scientists as “anti-religion” is both inaccurate and has the potential to exacerbate divisions between religious and scientific communities. By contrast, addressing misconceptions about who most religious people are and what they tend to believe, as well as who scientists are and what “science” entails, may cultivate both public trust in science and scientists’ willingness to welcome multiple identities and perspectives among their ranks.

在许多西方社会，如美国，“科学”被认为是一个两极分化和有争议的话题，与政治和宗教有关。尽管宗教和政治上保守的个人通常比非宗教和政治上自由的个人更不相信科学，但我们认为，宗教、科学以及宗教与科学之间的关系比通常假设的要微妙得多。把宗教人士定型为“反科学”，把科学家定型为“反宗教”既不准确，也有可能加剧宗教和科学界之间的分歧。相比之下，解决关于大多数宗教人士是谁以及他们倾向于相信什么，以及科学家是谁以及“科学”意味着什么的误解，可能既培养公众对科学的信任，也培养科学家在他们的队伍中欢迎多种身份和观点的意愿。

引用次数: 0

Intimate partner violence perpetration in sexual and gender minoritized communities 性和性别少数群体社区的亲密伴侣暴力行为

IF 6.9 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Current Opinion in Psychology

Pub Date : 2025-12-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102253

Dominic J. Parrott , Katie M. Edwards

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global public health problem that disproportionately affects sexual and gender minoritized (SGM) people. This disparity is rooted in the systematic, stigma-based oppression of SGM people. The etiology of IPV perpetration in SGM communities must account for both (1) population-specific factors, which stem from societal stigma or SGM-specific resilience, and (2) universal factors, which reflect risk and protective factors that are common across all intimate relationships. We review an integrative theoretical framework that accounts for these complexities and elucidates putative transdiagnostic mechanisms through which these factors influence IPV perpetration risk. This etiological framework has potential to catalyze future research that seeks to inform the development of affirming IPV prevention initiatives for SGM people.

亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）是一个全球公共卫生问题，对性和性别少数群体的影响尤为严重。这种差异的根源在于对SGM人群的系统性的、基于耻辱的压迫。SGM社区IPV犯罪的病因必须考虑两个因素：(1)人群特异性因素，源于社会污名或SGM特异性复原力；(2)普遍因素，反映所有亲密关系中常见的风险和保护因素。我们回顾了一个综合的理论框架，该框架解释了这些复杂性，并阐明了这些因素影响IPV犯罪风险的推定的跨诊断机制。这一病因学框架有可能促进未来的研究，旨在为SGM人群确定IPV预防举措的发展提供信息。

引用次数: 0

Interpersonal adversity and health across the life course 人际逆境与人生健康

IF 6.9 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Current Opinion in Psychology

Pub Date : 2025-12-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102259

Kyle J. Bourassa , Casey K. Brown

Partner violence is associated with a wide range of negative outcomes, including poorer physical health in the form of increased risk for acute injuries, chronic disease onset, and premature mortality. Importantly, exposure to partner violence is not limited to adulthood and can be embedded within a larger context of interpersonal adversity extending from childhood into older age. In this review, we summarize recent research linking interpersonal adversity to poor health across the life course, focusing on psychosocial, behavioral, and physiological mechanisms relevant to health. We first highlight the importance of embedding the experience of partner violence and health into a broader context of interpersonal adversity spanning the life course. We then outline links from childhood interpersonal adversity to psychosocial and physiological dysfunction in adulthood, including a specific focus on recent studies examining emotion regulation, coping, attachment styles, and health behaviors. We next examine the current evidence linking interpersonal adversity to health-relevant psychosocial and physiological outcomes, including among older adults. In this section, we highlight recent findings linking interpersonal adversity to neural mechanisms, cognition, immune function, and accelerated biological aging. We end our review by identifying limitations of the current literature studying how interpersonal adversity could affect later health and present causal inference methodologies that could help address these challenges.

伴侣暴力与一系列负面后果有关，包括身体健康状况较差，表现为急性受伤、慢性病发作和过早死亡的风险增加。重要的是，伴侣暴力的暴露并不局限于成年期，而且可以嵌入从童年到老年的人际逆境的更大背景中。在这篇综述中，我们总结了最近在整个生命过程中将人际逆境与健康状况不佳联系起来的研究，重点是与健康相关的社会心理、行为和生理机制。我们首先强调将伴侣暴力和健康的经历纳入跨越生命历程的人际逆境的更广泛背景的重要性。然后，我们概述了从童年的人际逆境到成年后的社会心理和生理功能障碍的联系，包括对最近关于情绪调节、应对、依恋风格和健康行为的研究的特别关注。接下来，我们将研究目前的证据，将人际逆境与健康相关的心理社会和生理结果联系起来，包括老年人。在本节中，我们将重点介绍人际逆境与神经机制、认知、免疫功能和加速生物衰老之间的联系。我们通过确定当前研究人际逆境如何影响后期健康的文献的局限性来结束我们的回顾，并提出可以帮助解决这些挑战的因果推理方法。

{"title":"Interpersonal adversity and health across the life course","authors":"Kyle J. Bourassa , Casey K. Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102259","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102259","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Partner violence is associated with a wide range of negative outcomes, including poorer physical health in the form of increased risk for acute injuries, chronic disease onset, and premature mortality. Importantly, exposure to partner violence is not limited to adulthood and can be embedded within a larger context of interpersonal adversity extending from childhood into older age. In this review, we summarize recent research linking interpersonal adversity to poor health across the life course, focusing on psychosocial, behavioral, and physiological mechanisms relevant to health. We first highlight the importance of embedding the experience of partner violence and health into a broader context of interpersonal adversity spanning the life course. We then outline links from childhood interpersonal adversity to psychosocial and physiological dysfunction in adulthood, including a specific focus on recent studies examining emotion regulation, coping, attachment styles, and health behaviors. We next examine the current evidence linking interpersonal adversity to health-relevant psychosocial and physiological outcomes, including among older adults. In this section, we highlight recent findings linking interpersonal adversity to neural mechanisms, cognition, immune function, and accelerated biological aging. We end our review by identifying limitations of the current literature studying how interpersonal adversity could affect later health and present causal inference methodologies that could help address these challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 102259"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145894013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Power, sexism, and aggression in intimate relationships 亲密关系中的权力、性别歧视和攻击性

IF 6.9 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Current Opinion in Psychology

Pub Date : 2025-12-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102255

Nickola C. Overall , Matthew D. Hammond , Emily J. Cross

Power and sexism contribute to men's and women's aggression in distinct ways. Prior perspectives focus on structural power inequalities or power within relationships, overlooking how both generate aggression. We apply ambivalent sexism theory to show that the tensions between asymmetries in structural power and mutual power in intimate man–woman relationships combine to explain aggression by men and women. Men's hostile sexism involves protecting structural and relationship power, amplifying aggression toward women partners to fight against losing power. Women's benevolent sexism involves accepting structural disadvantages to hold power within relationships, promoting aggression toward men partners when expected power is not realized. Addressing men's and women's aggression requires understanding how they negotiate needs for relationship power within contexts of gendered power asymmetries.

权力和性别歧视以不同的方式助长了男性和女性的攻击性。先前的观点侧重于结构性权力不平等或关系中的权力，忽视了两者如何产生侵略。我们运用矛盾的性别歧视理论来证明，在亲密的男女关系中，结构性权力不对称和相互权力之间的紧张关系结合起来解释了男性和女性的攻击行为。男性的敌意性别歧视包括保护结构和关系权力，放大对女性伴侣的攻击性，以对抗失去权力。女性善意的性别歧视包括接受结构性的劣势，以在关系中保持权力，当预期的权力没有实现时，促进对男性伴侣的攻击。解决男性和女性的攻击需要了解他们如何在性别权力不对称的背景下协商关系权力的需求。

引用次数: 0

首页上一页

下一页尾页

类型

全部化学•材料生命科学医学物理工程技术环境•农林材料科学地球科学法学管理学化学环境科学与生态学计算机科学教育学经济学农林科学人文科学生物学数学物理与天体物理心理学综合性期刊其他工业工程理学历史学农学文学信息工程

数据库

全部 ACS Publications Elsevier ieeexplore Springer The Royal Society of Chemistry Wiley

期刊

Current Opinion in Psychology

全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.

﹀