{"title":"Supplemental Material for Development of the White Innocence Legitimizing Beliefs Scale","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/cou0000833.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000833.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145397030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Mixed Methods Trial of a Peer Intervention for HIV and Partner Victimization in Transgender Women","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/cou0000832.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000832.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":"160 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145397026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplemental Material for The Road to Precarious Work: Studying Paid Domestic Cleaning Workers’ Career Trajectories","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/cou0000840.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000840.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":"174 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145396697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Black Women Coping With Gendered Racism: Examining the Role of Social Support","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/cou0000828.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000828.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":"149 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145396698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Internalized misogyny-defined as self-hatred among women, as well as hate, contempt, and disdain toward other women-remains an understudied construct in the psychological literature despite having large implications for women's mental health and well-being. To resolve measurement issues and clarify the construct, this study sought to develop and provide initial support for the new measure of internalized misogyny (MIM). With a diverse sample of 797 adult cisgender U.S. women partitioned into separate development (N = 394) and validation (N = 403) samples, we conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses as well as tests of construct validity, test-retest reliability, and measurement invariance. In Study 1, an exploratory factor analysis yielded a 13-item, one-factor scale with strong support for internal consistency reliability. Study 2 demonstrated support for the one-factor scale with the new sample as well as support for measurement invariance across race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation. Study 2 also evidenced convergent validity of the MIM with related measures of sexist or oppressive attitudes toward women, discriminant validity with both unrelated (e.g., social desirability) and similar but distinct measures (e.g., hostile sexism), and incremental validity via association of the MIM with psychological distress and flourishing above and beyond the influence of hostile, benevolent, and modern sexism. Finally, we also found support for strong test-retest reliability 1 month later. Findings provide strong support for the use of the new MIM and offer implications for future research seeking to identify and address adverse mental health outcomes in women. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
内化的厌女症——定义为女性的自我憎恨，以及对其他女性的憎恨、蔑视和蔑视——尽管对女性的心理健康和幸福有很大的影响，但在心理学文献中仍然是一个研究不足的概念。为了解决测量问题并明确其结构，本研究试图开发内化厌女症（MIM）的新测量方法，并为其提供初步支持。我们将797名美国成年顺性女性分为单独的开发样本（N = 394）和验证样本（N = 403），进行了探索性和验证性因素分析，并进行了结构效度、重测信度和测量不变性检验。在研究1中，探索性因子分析产生了一个13项的单因子量表，具有很强的内部一致性信度支持。研究2证明了新样本对单因素量表的支持，以及对跨种族、民族和性取向的测量不变性的支持。研究2还证明了MIM与性别歧视或对女性的压迫态度的相关措施的趋同效度，与不相关（如社会可取性）和相似但不同的措施（如敌意性别歧视）的歧视效度，以及通过MIM与心理困扰和超越敌意、仁慈和现代性别歧视影响的繁荣的关联而增加的效度。最后，我们还发现了1个月后强重测信度的支持。研究结果为使用新的MIM提供了强有力的支持，并为未来寻求识别和解决妇女不良心理健康结果的研究提供了启示。（PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA，版权所有）。
{"title":"Development and initial validation of the measure of internalized misogyny with cisgender U.S. women.","authors":"Melissa M Ertl,Lydia HaRim Ahn","doi":"10.1037/cou0000829","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000829","url":null,"abstract":"Internalized misogyny-defined as self-hatred among women, as well as hate, contempt, and disdain toward other women-remains an understudied construct in the psychological literature despite having large implications for women's mental health and well-being. To resolve measurement issues and clarify the construct, this study sought to develop and provide initial support for the new measure of internalized misogyny (MIM). With a diverse sample of 797 adult cisgender U.S. women partitioned into separate development (N = 394) and validation (N = 403) samples, we conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses as well as tests of construct validity, test-retest reliability, and measurement invariance. In Study 1, an exploratory factor analysis yielded a 13-item, one-factor scale with strong support for internal consistency reliability. Study 2 demonstrated support for the one-factor scale with the new sample as well as support for measurement invariance across race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation. Study 2 also evidenced convergent validity of the MIM with related measures of sexist or oppressive attitudes toward women, discriminant validity with both unrelated (e.g., social desirability) and similar but distinct measures (e.g., hostile sexism), and incremental validity via association of the MIM with psychological distress and flourishing above and beyond the influence of hostile, benevolent, and modern sexism. Finally, we also found support for strong test-retest reliability 1 month later. Findings provide strong support for the use of the new MIM and offer implications for future research seeking to identify and address adverse mental health outcomes in women. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145351505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Black trans and nonbinary persons in the United States, including nonbinary Black womxn (NBBW), traverse ongoing antitrans legislation and disproportionate violence. There is an immediate need for research examining how Black trans and nonbinary people, generally, and NBBW, particularly, negotiate if, when, and how to share their gendered-racial identities, which could inform the development of culturally informed approaches to working with gender-diverse Black womxn in research and practice. Therefore, we qualitatively examined NBBW perceptions regarding what influences their willingness to share their gendered-racial identity with others. Data were from Project Nonbinary Black Womxn, a multistudy community-based participatory action research project launched in 2023. We conducted semistructured online interviews with N = 11 predominantly Black American NBBW (M = 25.27, SD = 3.66, 21-30). We examined their responses to the following inquiry using interpretative phenomenological analysis guided by a Black queer feminist thought interpretive framework: What influences who and when you choose to share your identity with people? Themes were (a) "Safety is my number one priority": organic emergence (subthemes: passing "privilege" and relational intimacy) and (b) "We have politicians who are actively trying to eradicate queer and trans people": obligatory emergence (subtheme: communal protection and embodied advocacy). Findings inform decolonial conceptualizations of gender diversity and cultural humility within psychotherapeutic practice and research for NBBW populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"\"People already don't know what the fuck i'm saying\": Nonbinary Black womxn perspectives on sharing their gendered-racial identity.","authors":"Monyae A Kerney,Natalie Malone,Candice N Hargons","doi":"10.1037/cou0000830","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000830","url":null,"abstract":"Black trans and nonbinary persons in the United States, including nonbinary Black womxn (NBBW), traverse ongoing antitrans legislation and disproportionate violence. There is an immediate need for research examining how Black trans and nonbinary people, generally, and NBBW, particularly, negotiate if, when, and how to share their gendered-racial identities, which could inform the development of culturally informed approaches to working with gender-diverse Black womxn in research and practice. Therefore, we qualitatively examined NBBW perceptions regarding what influences their willingness to share their gendered-racial identity with others. Data were from Project Nonbinary Black Womxn, a multistudy community-based participatory action research project launched in 2023. We conducted semistructured online interviews with N = 11 predominantly Black American NBBW (M = 25.27, SD = 3.66, 21-30). We examined their responses to the following inquiry using interpretative phenomenological analysis guided by a Black queer feminist thought interpretive framework: What influences who and when you choose to share your identity with people? Themes were (a) \"Safety is my number one priority\": organic emergence (subthemes: passing \"privilege\" and relational intimacy) and (b) \"We have politicians who are actively trying to eradicate queer and trans people\": obligatory emergence (subtheme: communal protection and embodied advocacy). Findings inform decolonial conceptualizations of gender diversity and cultural humility within psychotherapeutic practice and research for NBBW populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145351506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pearis L. Jean, Della V. Mosley, Brittany Bridges, Gabriel Lockett, Koree Badio, Soleil Kennerly, Oluwafunmilayo Dada
{"title":"The strategically navigating anti-Black racism in professional spaces (SNAPS) decision-making model for Black graduate students and early career professionals.","authors":"Pearis L. Jean, Della V. Mosley, Brittany Bridges, Gabriel Lockett, Koree Badio, Soleil Kennerly, Oluwafunmilayo Dada","doi":"10.1037/cou0000826","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000826","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145295139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We examined the associations between White Privilege Attitudes Scale (WPAS) and two system-legitimizing ideologies, social dominance orientation and anti-immigrant attitudes, among 819 White American college students (63.2% women). Gender and critical consciousness were examined as potential moderators in these links. T tests assessed group differences in study variables based on gender. Direct associations between WPAS, system-legitimizing ideologies, and two-way interactions between gender and critical consciousness were examined via path analyses. White women reported significantly higher rates of WPAS and critical consciousness and significantly lower rates of system-legitimizing ideologies than White men. WPAS confront was negatively associated, and WPAS cost was positively associated with system-legitimizing ideologies. Significant positive two-way interactions were found between WPAS Cost × Gender and WPAS Cost × Critical Consciousness for system-legitimizing ideologies. Our findings identified distinct patterns between WPAS and system-legitimizing ideologies among White college students. The anticipated costs of addressing White privilege may serve as a barrier against reducing system-legitimizing ideologies, particularly among White men. Willingness to confront White privilege may be associated with lower system-legitimizing ideologies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究以819名美国白人大学生（女性占63.2%）为研究对象，考察了白人特权态度量表（WPAS）与两种制度合法化意识形态——社会支配取向和反移民态度之间的关系。性别和批判意识被认为是这些联系的潜在调节因素。T检验评估了基于性别的研究变量的组间差异。通过路径分析，研究了WPAS、系统合法化意识形态之间的直接联系，以及性别与批判意识之间的双向互动。白人女性报告的WPAS和批判意识的比例明显高于白人男性，而制度合法化意识的比例明显低于白人男性。WPAS对抗与系统合法化意识形态呈负相关，而WPAS成本与系统合法化意识形态呈正相关。WPAS成本×性别与WPAS成本×制度合法化意识批判意识之间存在显著的双向正向交互作用。我们的研究发现，在白人大学生中，WPAS和制度合法化意识形态之间存在明显的模式。解决白人特权问题的预期成本可能会成为阻碍削弱制度合法化意识形态的障碍，尤其是在白人男性中。对抗白人特权的意愿可能与较低的制度合法化意识形态有关。（PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA，版权所有）。
{"title":"Examining gender and critical consciousness in the associations between White privilege attitudes and system-legitimizing ideologies in White college students.","authors":"Delida Sanchez, Sarah Arango, Whitney Adams, Isabella Stoto, Génesis Genao, Enrique Aguayo, Annemarie Dechellis","doi":"10.1037/cou0000799","DOIUrl":"10.1037/cou0000799","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined the associations between White Privilege Attitudes Scale (WPAS) and two system-legitimizing ideologies, social dominance orientation and anti-immigrant attitudes, among 819 White American college students (63.2% women). Gender and critical consciousness were examined as potential moderators in these links. <i>T</i> tests assessed group differences in study variables based on gender. Direct associations between WPAS, system-legitimizing ideologies, and two-way interactions between gender and critical consciousness were examined via path analyses. White women reported significantly higher rates of WPAS and critical consciousness and significantly lower rates of system-legitimizing ideologies than White men. WPAS confront was negatively associated, and WPAS cost was positively associated with system-legitimizing ideologies. Significant positive two-way interactions were found between WPAS Cost × Gender and WPAS Cost × Critical Consciousness for system-legitimizing ideologies. Our findings identified distinct patterns between WPAS and system-legitimizing ideologies among White college students. The anticipated costs of addressing White privilege may serve as a barrier against reducing system-legitimizing ideologies, particularly among White men. Willingness to confront White privilege may be associated with lower system-legitimizing ideologies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"463-474"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144200485","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：