首页 > 最新文献

Psychology and Aging最新文献

英文 中文
A dual mechanisms of control account of age differences in working memory. 工作记忆年龄差异的双重控制机制解释。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1037/pag0000817
Chenlingxi Xu, Chang-Mao Chao, Nathan S Rose

Age-related differences in working memory (WM) can be large, but the exact sources are unclear. We hypothesized that young adults outperform older adults on WM tasks because they use controlled attention processes to prioritize the maintenance of relevant information in WM in a proactive mode, whereas older adults tend to rely on the strength of familiarity signals to make memory decisions in a reactive mode. We used a WM task that cued participants to prioritize one item over others and presented repeated lure probes that cause errors when one is engaged in a reactive mode. Results showed that, relative to young adults with full attention available to use proactive control during the delays, older adults with full attention (and young adults with divided attention) during the delays had exaggerated error rates to repeated lure probes compared to control probes. When the amount of proactive interference was increased (by repeating stimuli across trials), older adults were able to engage in proactive control, and this eliminated their exaggerated error rate (while young adults with divided attention could not). These results provide evidence for a dual mechanisms of control account of age differences in WM. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

工作记忆(WM)中与年龄相关的差异可能很大,但其确切来源尚不清楚。我们假设,年轻成人之所以在工作记忆任务中表现优于老年人,是因为他们在工作记忆中使用受控注意过程,以主动模式优先维持相关信息,而老年人则倾向于依赖熟悉度信号的强度,以被动模式做出记忆决定。我们使用了一项 WM 任务,提示参与者优先选择一个项目而不是其他项目,并在参与者处于反应模式时重复出现会导致错误的引诱探针。结果表明,相对于在延迟期间可以全神贯注地使用主动控制的年轻成人,在延迟期间全神贯注的老年人(和注意力分散的年轻成人)对重复引诱探针的错误率要比对照探针高。当主动干扰增加时(通过在试验中重复刺激),老年人能够进行主动控制,这消除了他们夸大的错误率(而注意力分散的年轻人则不能)。这些结果为解释WM年龄差异的双重控制机制提供了证据。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"A dual mechanisms of control account of age differences in working memory.","authors":"Chenlingxi Xu, Chang-Mao Chao, Nathan S Rose","doi":"10.1037/pag0000817","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pag0000817","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Age-related differences in working memory (WM) can be large, but the exact sources are unclear. We hypothesized that young adults outperform older adults on WM tasks because they use controlled attention processes to prioritize the maintenance of relevant information in WM in a proactive mode, whereas older adults tend to rely on the strength of familiarity signals to make memory decisions in a reactive mode. We used a WM task that cued participants to prioritize one item over others and presented repeated lure probes that cause errors when one is engaged in a reactive mode. Results showed that, relative to young adults with full attention available to use proactive control during the delays, older adults with full attention (and young adults with divided attention) during the delays had exaggerated error rates to repeated lure probes compared to control probes. When the amount of proactive interference was increased (by repeating stimuli across trials), older adults were able to engage in proactive control, and this eliminated their exaggerated error rate (while young adults with divided attention could not). These results provide evidence for a dual mechanisms of control account of age differences in WM. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141427978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evoking episodic and semantic details with instructional manipulation during autobiographical recall. 在自传体回忆过程中,通过指令操作唤起情节和语义细节。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1037/pag0000821
Greta Melega, Fiona Lancelotte, Ann-Kathrin Johnen, Michael Hornberger, Brian Levine, Louis Renoult

Older adults tend to describe experiences from their past with fewer episodic details, such as spatiotemporal and contextually specific information, but more nonepisodic details, particularly personal semantic knowledge, than younger adults. While the reduction in episodic details is interpreted in the context of episodic memory decline typical of aging, interpreting the increased production of semantic details is not as straightforward. We modified the widely used Autobiographical Interview (AI) to create a Semantic Autobiographical Interview (SAI) that explicitly targets personal (P-SAI) and general semantic memories (G-SAI) with the aim of better understanding the production of semantic information in aging depending on instructional manipulation. Overall, older adults produced a lower proportion of target details than young adults. There was an intra-individual consistency in the production of target details in the AI and P-SAI, suggesting a trait level in the production of personal target details or consistency in the narrative style and communicative goals adopted across interviews. Older adults consistently produced autobiographical facts and self-knowledge across interviews, suggesting that they are biased toward the production of personal semantic information regardless of instructions. These results cannot be easily accommodated by accounts of aging and memory emphasizing reduced cognitive control or compensation for episodic memory impairment. Nevertheless, future work is needed to fully disentangle between these accounts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

与年轻人相比,老年人在描述自己过去的经历时往往会减少情节细节,如时空和上下文的具体信息,但会增加非情节细节,尤其是个人语义知识。外显细节的减少可以用衰老典型的外显记忆衰退来解释,而语义细节的增加则不那么简单。我们对广泛使用的自传体访谈(AI)进行了修改,创建了语义自传体访谈(SAI),明确针对个人记忆(P-SAI)和一般语义记忆(G-SAI),目的是更好地了解老龄化过程中语义信息的产生取决于指导操作。总体而言,老年人生成的目标细节比例低于年轻人。在 AI 和 P-SAI 中,目标细节的生成在个体内部具有一致性,这表明个人目标细节的生成具有特质水平,或者说在不同访谈中所采用的叙述风格和交流目标具有一致性。老年人在不同的访谈中都会产生自传体事实和自我知识,这表明他们偏向于产生个人语义信息,而与指令无关。关于衰老和记忆的研究强调认知控制能力的下降或对外显记忆障碍的补偿,但这些结果并不容易被这些研究成果所接受。尽管如此,未来的工作仍需将这些观点完全区分开来。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Evoking episodic and semantic details with instructional manipulation during autobiographical recall.","authors":"Greta Melega, Fiona Lancelotte, Ann-Kathrin Johnen, Michael Hornberger, Brian Levine, Louis Renoult","doi":"10.1037/pag0000821","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000821","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Older adults tend to describe experiences from their past with fewer episodic details, such as spatiotemporal and contextually specific information, but more nonepisodic details, particularly personal semantic knowledge, than younger adults. While the reduction in episodic details is interpreted in the context of episodic memory decline typical of aging, interpreting the increased production of semantic details is not as straightforward. We modified the widely used Autobiographical Interview (AI) to create a Semantic Autobiographical Interview (SAI) that explicitly targets personal (P-SAI) and general semantic memories (G-SAI) with the aim of better understanding the production of semantic information in aging depending on instructional manipulation. Overall, older adults produced a lower proportion of target details than young adults. There was an intra-individual consistency in the production of target details in the AI and P-SAI, suggesting a trait level in the production of personal target details or consistency in the narrative style and communicative goals adopted across interviews. Older adults consistently produced autobiographical facts and self-knowledge across interviews, suggesting that they are biased toward the production of personal semantic information regardless of instructions. These results cannot be easily accommodated by accounts of aging and memory emphasizing reduced cognitive control or compensation for episodic memory impairment. Nevertheless, future work is needed to fully disentangle between these accounts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141427979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Historical change in trajectories of loneliness in old age: Older adults today are less lonely, but do not differ in their age trajectories. 老年人孤独感轨迹的历史变化:今天的老年人不再那么孤独,但他们的年龄轨迹并无不同。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1037/pag0000803
Bianca Suanet, Johanna Drewelies, Sandra Duezel, Peter Eibich, Ilja Demuth, Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen, Gert G Wagner, Ulman Lindenberger, Nilam Ram, Paolo Ghisletta, Denis Gerstorf

To check claims of a "loneliness epidemic," we examined whether current cohorts of older adults report higher levels and/or steeper age-related increases in loneliness than earlier-born peers. Specifically, we used 1,068 age-matched longitudinal reports (Mage observations = 79 years, 49% women) of loneliness provided by independent samples recruited in the German city of Berlin in 1990 and 2010, n = 257 participants in the Berlin Aging Study (BASE) and n = 383 participants in Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II). Using multilevel models that orthogonalize between-person and within-person age effects, we examined how responses to items from the UCLA Loneliness Scale provided by observation-matched cohorts differed with age and across cohorts, and if those differences might be explained by a variety of individual factors. Results revealed that at age 79, the later-born BASE-II cohort reported substantially lower levels of loneliness than the earlier-born BASE cohort (d = -0.84), with cohort differences accounting for more than 14% of the variance in loneliness. Age trajectories, however, were parallel without evidence of cohort differences in rates of within-person age-related changes in loneliness. Differences in gender, education, cognitive functioning, and external control beliefs accounted for the lion's share of cohort-related differences in levels of loneliness. Results show that loneliness among older adults has shifted to markedly lower levels today, but the rate at which loneliness increases with age proceeds similarly as 2 decades ago. Future studies should investigate how psychosocial functioning across the life course is progressing in different sociohistorical contexts and in other age groups, such as younger and middle-aged adults. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

为了验证 "孤独流行病 "的说法,我们研究了目前的老年人群是否比早年出生的同龄人报告了更高水平的孤独感和/或与年龄相关的更陡峭的孤独感增长。具体来说,我们使用了 1990 年和 2010 年在德国柏林市招募的独立样本提供的 1068 份年龄匹配的孤独感纵向报告(观察年龄 = 79 岁,49% 为女性),其中包括柏林老龄化研究(BASE)的 257 名参与者和柏林老龄化研究 II(BASE-II)的 383 名参与者。我们使用将人与人之间和人与人之间的年龄效应正交化的多层次模型,研究了观察匹配组群对加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表项目的反应随年龄和不同组群之间有何差异,以及这些差异是否可由各种个体因素解释。结果显示,在 79 岁时,较晚出生的 BASE-II 组群报告的孤独感水平大大低于较早出生的 BASE 组群(d = -0.84),组群差异占孤独感差异的 14% 以上。然而,年龄轨迹是平行的,没有证据表明在与孤独感年龄相关的变化率方面存在队列差异。性别、教育程度、认知功能和外部控制信念的差异占孤独感水平队列相关差异的绝大部分。研究结果表明,如今老年人的孤独感已明显降低,但孤独感随年龄增长的速度与二十年前类似。未来的研究应该调查在不同的社会历史背景下,以及在其他年龄段,如年轻人和中年人中,整个生命过程中的社会心理功能是如何发展的。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Historical change in trajectories of loneliness in old age: Older adults today are less lonely, but do not differ in their age trajectories.","authors":"Bianca Suanet, Johanna Drewelies, Sandra Duezel, Peter Eibich, Ilja Demuth, Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen, Gert G Wagner, Ulman Lindenberger, Nilam Ram, Paolo Ghisletta, Denis Gerstorf","doi":"10.1037/pag0000803","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pag0000803","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To check claims of a \"loneliness epidemic,\" we examined whether current cohorts of older adults report higher levels and/or steeper age-related increases in loneliness than earlier-born peers. Specifically, we used 1,068 age-matched longitudinal reports (M<sub>age observations</sub> = 79 years, 49% women) of loneliness provided by independent samples recruited in the German city of Berlin in 1990 and 2010, n = 257 participants in the Berlin Aging Study (BASE) and n = 383 participants in Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II). Using multilevel models that orthogonalize between-person and within-person age effects, we examined how responses to items from the UCLA Loneliness Scale provided by observation-matched cohorts differed with age and across cohorts, and if those differences might be explained by a variety of individual factors. Results revealed that at age 79, the later-born BASE-II cohort reported substantially lower levels of loneliness than the earlier-born BASE cohort (d = -0.84), with cohort differences accounting for more than 14% of the variance in loneliness. Age trajectories, however, were parallel without evidence of cohort differences in rates of within-person age-related changes in loneliness. Differences in gender, education, cognitive functioning, and external control beliefs accounted for the lion's share of cohort-related differences in levels of loneliness. Results show that loneliness among older adults has shifted to markedly lower levels today, but the rate at which loneliness increases with age proceeds similarly as 2 decades ago. Future studies should investigate how psychosocial functioning across the life course is progressing in different sociohistorical contexts and in other age groups, such as younger and middle-aged adults. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141427980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplemental Material for Are Social Interactions Perceived as More Meaningful in Older Adulthood? 补充材料:老年期的社会互动是否更有意义?
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI: 10.1037/pag0000827.supp
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Are Social Interactions Perceived as More Meaningful in Older Adulthood?","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pag0000827.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000827.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141120571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplemental Material for Impact of Stroke on Cognition in Old Age: Comparison of Two Population-Based Cohorts, Born up to 30 Years Apart and Followed From Age 70 to 85 中风对老年认知的影响》补充材料:比较两个出生时间相差 30 年、年龄介于 70 岁至 85 岁之间的人口组群
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI: 10.1037/pag0000824.supp
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Impact of Stroke on Cognition in Old Age: Comparison of Two Population-Based Cohorts, Born up to 30 Years Apart and Followed From Age 70 to 85","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pag0000824.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000824.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140969548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplemental Material for Predictors of Cognitive Aging Profiles Over 15 Years: A Longitudinal Population-Based Study 15 年认知老化特征的预测因素》补充材料:基于人口的纵向研究
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI: 10.1037/pag0000807.supp
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Predictors of Cognitive Aging Profiles Over 15 Years: A Longitudinal Population-Based Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pag0000807.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000807.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140995069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplemental Material for Efficacy of the Residential Care Transition Module: A Telehealth Intervention for Dementia Family Caregivers of Relatives Living in Residential Long-Term Care Settings 住院护理过渡模块的功效》补充材料:针对居住在寄宿式长期护理环境中的痴呆症亲属的家庭照顾者的远程保健干预措施
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI: 10.1037/pag0000820.supp
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Efficacy of the Residential Care Transition Module: A Telehealth Intervention for Dementia Family Caregivers of Relatives Living in Residential Long-Term Care Settings","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pag0000820.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000820.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140997738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perspective judgment across adulthood: Evidence from bilinguals. 跨越成年期的视角判断:来自双语者的证据
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1037/pag0000796
Dorit Segal, Gitit Kavé

Judging the perspective of others often requires ignoring one's own accessible knowledge. Aging increases reliance on the most available knowledge and may decrease the adjustment of this knowledge to adopt another perspective. Using a dominant language also decreases control demands, while using a nondominant language promotes deliberation. We examined whether aging and language dominance shape the way in which individuals judge someone else's interpretation of ambiguous messages. Russian-Hebrew bilinguals (N = 237, ages 19-80) read 20 ambiguous messages and judged how a recipient would interpret them. Half of the texts contained information that suggested that the message was sincere, and half of the texts contained information that implied that the message was sarcastic. This information was available only to the participant and should not have affected the recipient's interpretation. An egocentric bias emerged in both languages since participants could not ignore their own knowledge when judging the recipient's perspective. Aging was associated with a greater bias, but the results were similar in both languages. A second study included 60 younger (ages 18-39) and 62 older (ages 60-80) Israeli-born participants, who performed the same task as well as a flanker task (i.e., judging the direction of a central arrow flanked by congruent and incongruent distractors). Age interacted with the egocentric bias, but there was no correlation between the flanker effect and perspective judgment. Thus, decreased inhibition, as measured by the flanker task, cannot account for the egocentric bias. We suggest that the findings reflect difficulty in overriding highly accessible information, especially in older age. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

判断他人的观点往往需要忽略自己可获得的知识。年龄的增长增加了对最可用知识的依赖,并可能减少对这些知识的调整,以采纳另一种观点。使用优势语言也会降低控制要求,而使用非优势语言则会促进深思熟虑。我们研究了衰老和语言优势是否会影响个人判断他人对模棱两可信息的解释的方式。俄语和希伯来语双语者(N = 237,年龄 19-80 岁)阅读了 20 条模棱两可的信息,并判断收信人会如何解释这些信息。其中一半的文本包含暗示信息是真诚的信息,一半的文本包含暗示信息是讽刺的信息。这些信息只有被试能够获得,应该不会影响收信人的解读。两种语言都出现了以自我为中心的偏差,因为受试者在判断收信人的观点时无法忽略自己的知识。年龄越大,偏差越大,但两种语言的结果相似。第二项研究包括 60 名年龄较小(18-39 岁)和 62 名年龄较大(60-80 岁)的以色列出生的受试者,他们完成了相同的任务以及侧翼任务(即判断中央箭头的方向,两侧是一致和不一致的干扰项)。年龄与自我中心偏差存在相互作用,但侧翼效应与透视判断之间没有相关性。因此,侧翼任务所测量的抑制能力下降并不能解释以自我为中心的偏差。我们认为,这些研究结果反映了人们,尤其是老年人,在推翻高度可获取的信息时遇到的困难。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Perspective judgment across adulthood: Evidence from bilinguals.","authors":"Dorit Segal, Gitit Kavé","doi":"10.1037/pag0000796","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000796","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Judging the perspective of others often requires ignoring one's own accessible knowledge. Aging increases reliance on the most available knowledge and may decrease the adjustment of this knowledge to adopt another perspective. Using a dominant language also decreases control demands, while using a nondominant language promotes deliberation. We examined whether aging and language dominance shape the way in which individuals judge someone else's interpretation of ambiguous messages. Russian-Hebrew bilinguals (N = 237, ages 19-80) read 20 ambiguous messages and judged how a recipient would interpret them. Half of the texts contained information that suggested that the message was sincere, and half of the texts contained information that implied that the message was sarcastic. This information was available only to the participant and should not have affected the recipient's interpretation. An egocentric bias emerged in both languages since participants could not ignore their own knowledge when judging the recipient's perspective. Aging was associated with a greater bias, but the results were similar in both languages. A second study included 60 younger (ages 18-39) and 62 older (ages 60-80) Israeli-born participants, who performed the same task as well as a flanker task (i.e., judging the direction of a central arrow flanked by congruent and incongruent distractors). Age interacted with the egocentric bias, but there was no correlation between the flanker effect and perspective judgment. Thus, decreased inhibition, as measured by the flanker task, cannot account for the egocentric bias. We suggest that the findings reflect difficulty in overriding highly accessible information, especially in older age. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141201150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Age-related differences in the evaluation of highly arousing language. 评价高刺激性语言时与年龄有关的差异。
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1037/pag0000809
Meredith A Shafto, Lise Abrams, Lori E James

Emotional properties of words can profoundly affect their processing, depending on both the valence (pleasantness) and the degree of arousal (excitation) that the word elicits. Words that are strongly emotionally arousing (such as taboo words) can interfere with subsequent language processing (White & Abrams, 2021). However, little is known about whether or how aging affects the processing of highly arousing language. The present study provides a characterization of how adults across the lifespan evaluate highly arousing language with a simple rating task that included taboo words, which have previously been used to examine lexical interference caused by arousal, and humorous words, which are also highly arousing without being negatively valenced. While arousal ratings were strongly positively correlated with both tabooness and humor ratings for young adults, these relationships weakened with age and overall arousal ratings were lower for middle-aged and older adults compared to young adults. Age effects cannot be readily accounted for by age-related differences in psychosocial variables such as self-reported profanity avoidance or religiosity. The effect of age on arousal should be considered in the design of studies examining age-related changes in emotional language processing. Furthermore, age differences in arousal should be considered as a potential mechanism in studies exploring emotional language processing across adulthood. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

词语的情感属性会深刻影响其语言处理过程,这取决于词语所引起的情感(愉快度)和唤醒(兴奋度)程度。强烈激发情绪的词语(如禁忌词语)会干扰后续的语言处理(White & Abrams,2021 年)。然而,人们对衰老是否或如何影响高度唤醒语言的处理知之甚少。本研究通过一个简单的评分任务,对成年人在不同的生命周期中如何评价高唤醒性语言进行了描述,该任务包括禁忌词(以前曾被用来研究唤醒引起的词汇干扰)和幽默词(也是高唤醒性的,但没有负面评价)。虽然年轻成人的唤醒评分与禁忌词和幽默词的评分呈强烈的正相关,但这些关系随着年龄的增长而减弱,与年轻成人相比,中老年人的总体唤醒评分较低。年龄效应并不能通过与年龄相关的社会心理变量(如自我报告的亵渎回避或宗教信仰)的差异轻易解释。在设计与年龄相关的情绪语言处理变化的研究时,应考虑年龄对唤醒的影响。此外,在探索成年期情绪语言处理的研究中,也应将唤醒的年龄差异视为一种潜在机制。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Age-related differences in the evaluation of highly arousing language.","authors":"Meredith A Shafto, Lise Abrams, Lori E James","doi":"10.1037/pag0000809","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000809","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emotional properties of words can profoundly affect their processing, depending on both the valence (pleasantness) and the degree of arousal (excitation) that the word elicits. Words that are strongly emotionally arousing (such as taboo words) can interfere with subsequent language processing (White & Abrams, 2021). However, little is known about whether or how aging affects the processing of highly arousing language. The present study provides a characterization of how adults across the lifespan evaluate highly arousing language with a simple rating task that included taboo words, which have previously been used to examine lexical interference caused by arousal, and humorous words, which are also highly arousing without being negatively valenced. While arousal ratings were strongly positively correlated with both tabooness and humor ratings for young adults, these relationships weakened with age and overall arousal ratings were lower for middle-aged and older adults compared to young adults. Age effects cannot be readily accounted for by age-related differences in psychosocial variables such as self-reported profanity avoidance or religiosity. The effect of age on arousal should be considered in the design of studies examining age-related changes in emotional language processing. Furthermore, age differences in arousal should be considered as a potential mechanism in studies exploring emotional language processing across adulthood. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141201142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Age-related differences in understanding pronominal reference in sentence comprehension: An electrophysiological investigation. 句子理解中理解代词指称的年龄差异:电生理学调查
IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-31 DOI: 10.1037/pag0000775
Chia-Lin Lee, Chia-Ho Lai

This study aimed to investigate how age affects the ability to comprehend sentence meaning, specifically how individuals resolve pronouns to their corresponding nouns. The study included 34 young participants (20-29 years old) and 34 older participants (60-81 years old). The participants were presented with sentences containing two characters and a third-person singular pronoun. Stereotypical genders associated with character names were manipulated such that the pronoun had either one, two, or no possible antecedents, rendering the pronoun referentially unambiguous, ambiguous, or mismatched, respectively. Consistent with the prior findings on preserved syntactic processing with advanced age, event-related potential data time-locked to the critical pronouns showed a P600 effect to mismatched pronouns regardless of age. These results indicate that older adults, like their younger counterparts, have a strong preference for readily available antecedents. When the pronoun was ambiguous, younger adults showed a typical Nref effect-a sustained anterior negativity associated with elaborative inferencing to search for the referent. Older adults did not exhibit this effect, suggesting a reduction in elaborative processes for establishing coherence. Nevertheless, the Nref response to ambiguous pronouns was observed in a subset of older adults, who also showed a Nref instead of P600 response to mismatched pronouns. Overall, individuals who elicited the Nref response to ambiguous pronouns were associated with a higher level of print exposure, suggesting that life-long reading experience may help to counteract age-related decline. Together, these findings help characterize the differential effects of aging on pronominal understanding and provide initial electrophysiological evidence of the protective benefit of print exposure on language processing in the aging population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

本研究旨在探讨年龄如何影响理解句子含义的能力,特别是个人如何将代词解析为相应的名词。研究包括 34 名年轻参与者(20-29 岁)和 34 名老年参与者(60-81 岁)。研究人员向参与者展示了包含两个角色和一个第三人称单数代词的句子。与人物名称相关的性别刻板印象被操纵,使代词有一个、两个或没有可能的前因后果,从而使代词的指代分别变得不明确、模糊或不匹配。与之前关于高龄保留句法加工的研究结果一致,与关键代词时间锁定的事件相关电位数据对不匹配代词显示出 P600 效应,而与年龄无关。这些结果表明,老年人和年轻人一样,对现成的先行词有强烈的偏好。当代词模棱两可时,年轻成人表现出典型的 Nref 效应--一种与精心推理以寻找所指相关的持续前部否定性。而老年人则没有表现出这种效应,这表明他们建立连贯性的推理过程有所减少。然而,在一部分老年人中观察到了对模糊代词的 Nref 反应,他们对不匹配的代词也表现出 Nref 而不是 P600 反应。总体而言,对模糊代词做出 Nref 反应的人与较高的印刷品接触水平有关,这表明终生的阅读经验可能有助于抵消与年龄有关的衰退。总之,这些研究结果有助于描述衰老对代词理解的不同影响,并提供了电生理学的初步证据,证明阅读对衰老人群的语言处理具有保护作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Age-related differences in understanding pronominal reference in sentence comprehension: An electrophysiological investigation.","authors":"Chia-Lin Lee, Chia-Ho Lai","doi":"10.1037/pag0000775","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pag0000775","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate how age affects the ability to comprehend sentence meaning, specifically how individuals resolve pronouns to their corresponding nouns. The study included 34 young participants (20-29 years old) and 34 older participants (60-81 years old). The participants were presented with sentences containing two characters and a third-person singular pronoun. Stereotypical genders associated with character names were manipulated such that the pronoun had either one, two, or no possible antecedents, rendering the pronoun referentially unambiguous, ambiguous, or mismatched, respectively. Consistent with the prior findings on preserved syntactic processing with advanced age, event-related potential data time-locked to the critical pronouns showed a P600 effect to mismatched pronouns regardless of age. These results indicate that older adults, like their younger counterparts, have a strong preference for readily available antecedents. When the pronoun was ambiguous, younger adults showed a typical Nref effect-a sustained anterior negativity associated with elaborative inferencing to search for the referent. Older adults did not exhibit this effect, suggesting a reduction in elaborative processes for establishing coherence. Nevertheless, the Nref response to ambiguous pronouns was observed in a subset of older adults, who also showed a Nref instead of P600 response to mismatched pronouns. Overall, individuals who elicited the Nref response to ambiguous pronouns were associated with a higher level of print exposure, suggesting that life-long reading experience may help to counteract age-related decline. Together, these findings help characterize the differential effects of aging on pronominal understanding and provide initial electrophysiological evidence of the protective benefit of print exposure on language processing in the aging population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10477449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Psychology and Aging
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1