首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Organizational Behavior最新文献

英文 中文
A neurocognitive framework of attention and creativity: Maximizing usefulness and novelty via directed and undirected pathways 注意力和创造力的神经认知框架:通过定向和非定向途径实现有用性和新颖性的最大化
IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.1002/job.2787
Gillian B. Yeo, Nicole A. Celestine, Sharon K. Parker, March L. To, Giles Hirst

Coming up with creative ideas is not easy. In this conceptual article, we integrate organizational behavior, cognitive psychology, and neuroscience literatures to propose that different forms of attention may be a key to maximizing creative usefulness and novelty. Specifically, we develop a neurocognitive framework of attentional control to propose differential pathways from creative goal-directed attention (a narrow and selective focus) to deliberate information processing, and from undirected attention (a wide and unconstrained focus) to spontaneous information processing. These propositions have implications for creative usefulness and novelty, respectively—namely, that creative goal-directed attention should facilitate the usefulness of creative outputs to a greater extent than their novelty, whereas undirected attention should promote the novelty of creative outputs to a greater extent than their usefulness. Our framework further suggests that time spent experiencing creative goal-directed attention followed by undirected attention is the optimal sequence for maximizing both the usefulness and novelty of creative outputs. In combination, our framework advances theoretical understanding of attentional pathways to creative outcomes and offers practical implications for maximizing creative potential at work.

摘要提出创造性想法并非易事。在这篇概念性文章中,我们整合了组织行为学、认知心理学和神经科学文献,提出不同形式的注意力可能是最大限度地提高创意有用性和新颖性的关键。具体来说,我们建立了一个注意力控制的神经认知框架,提出了从创造性目标导向型注意力(狭义的、有选择性的注意力)到有意信息处理,以及从非导向型注意力(广义的、无约束的注意力)到自发信息处理的不同途径。这些命题分别对创造性的有用性和新颖性产生了影响--也就是说,创造性目标定向注意对创造性产出有用性的促进作用应大于其新颖性,而非定向注意对创造性产出新颖性的促进作用应大于其有用性。我们的框架进一步表明,花时间体验创造性目标定向注意,然后再体验非定向注意,是最大限度地提高创造性产出的有用性和新颖性的最佳顺序。综合来看,我们的框架推进了对创造性成果的注意途径的理论理解,并为最大限度地发挥工作中的创造性潜能提供了实际意义。
{"title":"A neurocognitive framework of attention and creativity: Maximizing usefulness and novelty via directed and undirected pathways","authors":"Gillian B. Yeo,&nbsp;Nicole A. Celestine,&nbsp;Sharon K. Parker,&nbsp;March L. To,&nbsp;Giles Hirst","doi":"10.1002/job.2787","DOIUrl":"10.1002/job.2787","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Coming up with creative ideas is not easy. In this conceptual article, we integrate organizational behavior, cognitive psychology, and neuroscience literatures to propose that different forms of attention may be a key to maximizing creative usefulness and novelty. Specifically, we develop a neurocognitive framework of attentional control to propose differential pathways from creative goal-directed attention (a narrow and selective focus) to deliberate information processing, and from undirected attention (a wide and unconstrained focus) to spontaneous information processing. These propositions have implications for creative usefulness and novelty, respectively—namely, that creative goal-directed attention should facilitate the usefulness of creative outputs to a greater extent than their novelty, whereas undirected attention should promote the novelty of creative outputs to a greater extent than their usefulness. Our framework further suggests that time spent experiencing creative goal-directed attention followed by undirected attention is the optimal sequence for maximizing both the usefulness and novelty of creative outputs. In combination, our framework advances theoretical understanding of attentional pathways to creative outcomes and offers practical implications for maximizing creative potential at work.</p>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/job.2787","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140589261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Leaders pressuring teams and teams engaged in deviance: An examination of leader–team extraversion incongruence 领导者对团队施压与团队参与偏差:对领导者-团队外向性不一致性的研究
IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI: 10.1002/job.2785
Brian W. McCormick, Erik Gonzalez-Mulé, Jee Young Seong

Researchers have cited the need to account for subordinates in the leadership process, and the leader–team fit paradigm provides a framework for simultaneously considering the characteristics of leaders and those of their subordinate teams. Drawing on extraversion personality theory stipulating extraversion's implications on motivation and communication styles and preferences, we seek to add nuance to the study of a trait that has been widely assumed to exert positive effects in leaders and teams. Integrating theorizing on extraversion and fit, we posit in this research that counterproductive leader and team behaviors will be associated with misfit leader–team pairings in which extraversion incongruence exists (leaders higher in extraversion paired with teams lower in extraversion or leaders lower in extraversion paired with teams higher in extraversion). We test our predictions in a time-lagged field survey study of leaders and their respective teams in the nuclear power industry, using polynomial regression analyses to find support for hypotheses about the association of leader–team extraversion incongruence and detrimental leader (use of pressure influence tactics) and team (deviance directed at the organization) behaviors. We discuss the implications of our findings for research and practice on leaders, teams, deviance, and extraversion.

摘要研究人员指出,在领导过程中需要考虑下属的因素,而领导者-团队契合范式为同时考虑领导者及其下属团队的特征提供了一个框架。外向性人格理论规定了外向性对动机、沟通风格和偏好的影响,我们希望通过对这一被普遍认为会对领导者和团队产生积极影响的特质的研究,为这一研究增添更多的微妙之处。结合关于外向性和契合度的理论,我们在本研究中假设,领导者和团队的适得其反行为将与存在外向性不协调的错误领导者-团队配对(外向性较高的领导者与外向性较低的团队配对,或外向性较低的领导者与外向性较高的团队配对)相关联。我们对核电行业的领导者及其团队进行了一项时滞实地调查研究,利用多项式回归分析检验了我们的预测,发现领导者-团队外向性不协调与领导者(使用压力影响策略)和团队(针对组织的偏差)的有害行为之间的关联假设得到了支持。我们将讨论我们的发现对领导者、团队、偏差和外向性的研究和实践的影响。
{"title":"Leaders pressuring teams and teams engaged in deviance: An examination of leader–team extraversion incongruence","authors":"Brian W. McCormick,&nbsp;Erik Gonzalez-Mulé,&nbsp;Jee Young Seong","doi":"10.1002/job.2785","DOIUrl":"10.1002/job.2785","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Researchers have cited the need to account for subordinates in the leadership process, and the leader–team fit paradigm provides a framework for simultaneously considering the characteristics of leaders and those of their subordinate teams. Drawing on extraversion personality theory stipulating extraversion's implications on motivation and communication styles and preferences, we seek to add nuance to the study of a trait that has been widely assumed to exert positive effects in leaders and teams. Integrating theorizing on extraversion and fit, we posit in this research that counterproductive leader and team behaviors will be associated with misfit leader–team pairings in which extraversion incongruence exists (leaders higher in extraversion paired with teams lower in extraversion or leaders lower in extraversion paired with teams higher in extraversion). We test our predictions in a time-lagged field survey study of leaders and their respective teams in the nuclear power industry, using polynomial regression analyses to find support for hypotheses about the association of leader–team extraversion incongruence and detrimental leader (use of pressure influence tactics) and team (deviance directed at the organization) behaviors. We discuss the implications of our findings for research and practice on leaders, teams, deviance, and extraversion.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140589580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to “Good marriage at home, creativity at work: Family–work enrichment effect on workplace creativity” 更正 "家庭婚姻好,工作创造力强:家庭与工作的相互促进对工作场所创造力的影响"
IF 6.8 2区 管理学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-03-31 DOI: 10.1002/job.2790

Tang, Y., Huang, X., & Wang, Y. (2017). Good marriage at home, creativity at work: Family–work enrichment effect on workplace creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(5), 749766, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2175

On Page 754, the text of Hypothesis H4 “Employees' creative personality moderates the indirect relationship between their marital satisfaction and workplace creativity through family–work resource spillover, such that the relationship is more pronounced when employees' creative personality is high than when it is low.” was incorrect. This should have read: “Employees' creative personality moderates the indirect relationship between their marital satisfaction and workplace creativity through family–work resource spillover, such that the relationship is more pronounced when employees' creative personality is low than when it is high.”

We apologize for this error.

Tang, Y., Huang, X., & Wang, Y. (2017).家庭婚姻好,工作创造力强:家庭工作丰富化对工作场所创造力的影响。Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(5), 749-766, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2175On 第 754 页,假设 H4 "员工的创造性人格通过家庭-工作资源溢出调节其婚姻满意度与工作场所创造力之间的间接关系,当员工的创造性人格高时,这种关系比低时更明显。"的文字有误。应改为"员工的创造性个性通过家庭-工作资源外溢调节了婚姻满意度与工作场所创造力之间的间接关系,因此当员工的创造性个性较低时,这种关系比创造性个性较高时更为明显。"我们对此错误表示歉意。
{"title":"Correction to “Good marriage at home, creativity at work: Family–work enrichment effect on workplace creativity”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/job.2790","DOIUrl":"10.1002/job.2790","url":null,"abstract":"<p>\u0000 <span>Tang, Y.</span>, <span>Huang, X.</span>, &amp; <span>Wang, Y.</span> (<span>2017</span>). <span>Good marriage at home, creativity at work: Family–work enrichment effect on workplace creativity</span>. <i>Journal of Organizational Behavior</i>, <span>38</span>(<span>5</span>), <span>749</span>–<span>766</span>, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2175</p><p>On Page 754, the text of Hypothesis H4 “Employees' creative personality moderates the indirect relationship between their marital satisfaction and workplace creativity through family–work resource spillover, such that the relationship is more pronounced <i>when employees' creative personality is high than when it is low</i>.” was incorrect. This should have read: “Employees' creative personality moderates the indirect relationship between their marital satisfaction and workplace creativity through family–work resource spillover, such that the relationship is more pronounced <i>when employees' creative personality is low than when it is high</i>.”</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/job.2790","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140589167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
It is Monday again: Weekend sleep differentially relates to the workweek via reattachment on Monday 又到周一了:周末睡眠通过周一的重新依附与工作周的不同关系
IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI: 10.1002/job.2788
Jette Völker, Monika Wiegelmann, Theresa J. S. Koch, Sabine Sonnentag

The weekend constitutes an important recovery period for employees. However, psychologically reattaching to work on Monday can be difficult because employees must transition from their private to their work role. Building on boundary theory and integrating a sleep and circadian perspective, we shed light on this transition by investigating antecedents and outcomes of Monday reattachment. We propose that three weekend sleep characteristics differentially relate to reattachment on Monday: weekend sleep quality, catch-up sleep (extended sleep duration on the weekend), and social sleep lag (differences in sleep times workweek vs. weekend). Successful reattachment on Monday should, in turn, be related to lower levels of exhaustion and higher task performance during the workweek. We conducted a weekly diary study with 310 employees (933 weeks) over four workweeks. Two-level path models demonstrated that higher weekend sleep quality was indirectly related to lower levels of workweek exhaustion via higher levels of Monday reattachment. In contrast, higher catch-up sleep was related to higher levels of workweek exhaustion via lower levels of Monday reattachment. Accordingly, we demonstrate that Monday reattachment can set the tone for the entire workweek, but the capability to reattach can depend on weekend sleep as a core recovery process.

周末是员工重要的恢复期。然而,由于员工必须从私人角色过渡到工作角色,因此在周一从心理上重新适应工作可能会很困难。在边界理论的基础上,结合睡眠和昼夜节律的观点,我们通过研究周一重归工作的前因和结果,揭示了这种过渡。我们认为,三种周末睡眠特征与周一的重新归属有着不同的关系:周末睡眠质量、补觉(周末睡眠时间延长)和社交睡眠滞后(工作日与周末睡眠时间的差异)。反过来,周一成功的重新依恋应该与工作周内较低的疲惫程度和较高的任务绩效有关。我们在四个工作周内对 310 名员工(933 周)进行了每周日记研究。两级路径模型显示,较高的周末睡眠质量通过较高的周一重新依恋水平间接与较低的工作周疲惫水平相关。相反,较高的补眠质量通过较低的周一再依恋水平与较高的工作周疲惫水平相关。因此,我们证明,周一的重新依恋可以为整个工作周定下基调,但重新依恋的能力可能取决于周末睡眠这一核心恢复过程。
{"title":"It is Monday again: Weekend sleep differentially relates to the workweek via reattachment on Monday","authors":"Jette Völker,&nbsp;Monika Wiegelmann,&nbsp;Theresa J. S. Koch,&nbsp;Sabine Sonnentag","doi":"10.1002/job.2788","DOIUrl":"10.1002/job.2788","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The weekend constitutes an important recovery period for employees. However, psychologically reattaching to work on Monday can be difficult because employees must transition from their private to their work role. Building on boundary theory and integrating a sleep and circadian perspective, we shed light on this transition by investigating antecedents and outcomes of Monday reattachment. We propose that three weekend sleep characteristics differentially relate to reattachment on Monday: weekend sleep quality, catch-up sleep (extended sleep duration on the weekend), and social sleep lag (differences in sleep times workweek vs. weekend). Successful reattachment on Monday should, in turn, be related to lower levels of exhaustion and higher task performance during the workweek. We conducted a weekly diary study with 310 employees (933 weeks) over four workweeks. Two-level path models demonstrated that higher weekend sleep quality was indirectly related to lower levels of workweek exhaustion via higher levels of Monday reattachment. In contrast, higher catch-up sleep was related to higher levels of workweek exhaustion via lower levels of Monday reattachment. Accordingly, we demonstrate that Monday reattachment can set the tone for the entire workweek, but the capability to reattach can depend on weekend sleep as a core recovery process.</p>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/job.2788","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140368608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A paradox theory lens on proactivity, individual ambidexterity, and creativity: An empirical look 悖论理论透视积极主动、个人灵活性和创造力:实证研究
IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-03-21 DOI: 10.1002/job.2786
Jie Wang, Tae-Yeol Kim, Thomas S. Bateman, Yuan Jiang, Guiyao Tang

Paradox theory suggests that contradictory demands, like applying current work methods while exploring new ones, should be viewed as dualities with competing and complementary aspects. It advocates for employee ambidexterity, where employees must manage exploitation and exploration. We know little about how personal dispositions affect ambidexterity independently or when interacting with situational factors. Based on a time-lagged survey of 364 employee–supervisor pairs from 74 R&D teams, we found that proactive disposition was positively related to ambidexterity, enhancing creativity. Guided by trait activation theory, we found further that paradoxical supervision and job autonomy enhanced the relationship between proactive disposition and employee ambidexterity and the indirect effect of proactive disposition on creativity via ambidexterity. We discuss these findings' theoretical and practical implications, extending the literature on proactivity, ambidexterity, and paradox theory.

摘要帕拉多克理论认为,应将相互矛盾的要求(如应用现有工作方法和探索新方法)视为既相互竞争又相互补充的两面性。该理论提倡员工的灵活性,即员工必须处理好利用和探索的关系。我们对个人倾向如何单独或与情境因素相互作用影响灵活性知之甚少。我们对来自 74 个研发团队的 364 对员工-主管进行了时滞调查,发现积极主动的性格与灵活性呈正相关,从而提高了创造力。在特质激活理论的指导下,我们进一步发现,悖论性监督和工作自主性增强了主动性倾向与员工灵活性之间的关系,以及主动性倾向通过灵活性对创造力的间接影响。我们讨论了这些发现的理论和实践意义,扩展了有关主动性、灵活性和悖论理论的文献。
{"title":"A paradox theory lens on proactivity, individual ambidexterity, and creativity: An empirical look","authors":"Jie Wang,&nbsp;Tae-Yeol Kim,&nbsp;Thomas S. Bateman,&nbsp;Yuan Jiang,&nbsp;Guiyao Tang","doi":"10.1002/job.2786","DOIUrl":"10.1002/job.2786","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Paradox theory suggests that contradictory demands, like applying current work methods while exploring new ones, should be viewed as dualities with competing and complementary aspects. It advocates for employee ambidexterity, where employees must manage exploitation and exploration. We know little about how personal dispositions affect ambidexterity independently or when interacting with situational factors. Based on a time-lagged survey of 364 employee–supervisor pairs from 74 R&amp;D teams, we found that proactive disposition was positively related to ambidexterity, enhancing creativity. Guided by trait activation theory, we found further that paradoxical supervision and job autonomy enhanced the relationship between proactive disposition and employee ambidexterity and the indirect effect of proactive disposition on creativity via ambidexterity. We discuss these findings' theoretical and practical implications, extending the literature on proactivity, ambidexterity, and paradox theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/job.2786","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140202621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Think star, think men? Implicit star performer theories 想到明星就想到男人?隐性明星表演者理论
IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-03-12 DOI: 10.1002/job.2784
Isabel Villamor, Herman Aguinis

The star performer gender gap highlights women's challenges in being recognized as star performers. We investigated whether people hold shared beliefs about characteristics star performers possess (i.e., implicit star performer theories, ISPTs) and whether perceptions of stars are (a) gendered and (b) context-specific. Guided by categorization theory, we argue that individuals have shared perceptions of what constitutes a star performer. Employing an inductive approach, we uncovered the existence of ISPTs that are distinct and differ from previously identified implicit theories, such as those about leadership. Specifically, stars were believed to have six characteristics: Driven, Relational, Extraordinary, Fascinating, Tenacious, and Brilliant. We then applied role congruity theory to argue that perceptions of star performers would be gendered and context-dependent. Using an experimental approach, we ascertained that people associated star performers with more masculine than feminine attributes, what we labeled the think star, think men phenomenon. Moreover, this association was context-dependent, such that the association of star performers with masculine attributes was stronger in men-dominated occupations. Our third study used a non-reactive approach (i.e., “Princeton trilogy”), and results showed that star performers are seen as possessing more masculine attributes than very good employees. Overall, our three studies using inductive, experimental, and indirect methods based on eight samples of 2322 participants consistently supported the existence of ISPTs and the think star, think men phenomenon, improving our understanding of the star performer gender gap.

摘要 明星表演者的性别差距凸显了女性在被认可为明星表演者方面所面临的挑战。我们研究了人们是否对明星表演者所具有的特征持有共同的信念(即内隐明星表演者理论,ISPTs),以及对明星的认知是否(a)具有性别差异和(b)具有特定情境。在分类理论的指导下,我们认为,个人对什么是明星表演者有着共同的认知。通过归纳法,我们发现了与以往发现的隐性理论(如有关领导力的理论)不同的 ISPTs 的存在。具体来说,我们认为明星具有以下六个特征:驱动力、关系、非凡、魅力、顽强和卓越。然后,我们运用角色一致性理论,论证了对明星表演者的认知是有性别差异的,并且是与情境相关的。通过实验方法,我们发现人们会将明星表演者与男性特质联系起来,而不是女性特质,我们称之为 "认为明星就是男人 "现象。此外,这种关联还与环境有关,比如在男性占主导地位的职业中,明星表演者与男性特质的关联更强。我们的第三项研究采用了非反应式方法(即 "普林斯顿三部曲"),结果表明,与非常优秀的员工相比,表现出色的明星员工被认为更具有男性特质。总之,我们的三项研究使用了归纳法、实验法和间接法,基于 8 个样本 2322 名参与者,一致支持 ISPT 的存在和 "认为明星就是男人 "的现象,从而提高了我们对明星员工性别差距的理解。
{"title":"Think star, think men? Implicit star performer theories","authors":"Isabel Villamor,&nbsp;Herman Aguinis","doi":"10.1002/job.2784","DOIUrl":"10.1002/job.2784","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The star performer gender gap highlights women's challenges in being recognized as star performers. We investigated whether people hold shared beliefs about characteristics star performers possess (i.e., implicit star performer theories, ISPTs) and whether perceptions of stars are (a) gendered and (b) context-specific. Guided by categorization theory, we argue that individuals have shared perceptions of what constitutes a star performer. Employing an inductive approach, we uncovered the existence of ISPTs that are distinct and differ from previously identified implicit theories, such as those about leadership. Specifically, stars were believed to have six characteristics: <i>Driven, Relational, Extraordinary, Fascinating, Tenacious</i>, and <i>Brilliant</i>. We then applied role congruity theory to argue that perceptions of star performers would be gendered and context-dependent. Using an experimental approach, we ascertained that people associated star performers with more masculine than feminine attributes, what we labeled the <i>think star, think men</i> phenomenon. Moreover, this association was context-dependent, such that the association of star performers with masculine attributes was stronger in men-dominated occupations. Our third study used a non-reactive approach (i.e., “Princeton trilogy”), and results showed that star performers are seen as possessing more masculine attributes than very good employees. Overall, our three studies using inductive, experimental, and indirect methods based on eight samples of 2322 participants consistently supported the existence of ISPTs and the <i>think star, think men</i> phenomenon, improving our understanding of the star performer gender gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/job.2784","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140156031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rotten apples in bad barrels: Psychopathy, counterproductive work behavior, and the role of social context 坏桶里的烂苹果:心理变态、适得其反的工作行为以及社会环境的作用
IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI: 10.1002/job.2783
Min Z. Carter, Michael S. Cole, Jeremy B. Bernerth, Peter D. Harms, Aric Wilhau, Joshua C. Palmer

There is an inherent interest in the implications of psychopathic employees, although attention, to date, is more pronounced in public media than in the scientific literature. In this study, we use behavioral threshold theory to propose a curvilinear relationship between employees' psychopathy and their counterproductive work behavior (CWB). Our predictions were corroborated across three studies involving two countries while controlling for narcissism and Machiavellianism. Specifically, we find that the destructive nature of psychopathy is amplified with accelerated levels of CWB among individuals high on psychopathy. These results address mixed and unexpected findings in the literature, thereby offering a more nuanced understanding of the psychopathy–CWB relationship. Drawing additionally on trait activation theory, we examine the moderating effects of social context as manifested in relationship conflict with coworkers and abusive supervision. Results support the moderated hypotheses such that the psychopathy–CWB curvilinear relationship is stronger in negative social environments for both self-rated and other-rated CWB assessments. As the relationships between individuals' dark traits and behavioral outcomes are likely more complex than simple linear relations, we advocate future research to combine complementary theoretical lenses for improved theoretical precision.

摘要人们对心理变态员工的影响有着与生俱来的兴趣,尽管迄今为止,公众媒体的关注度要高于科学文献。在本研究中,我们利用行为阈值理论,提出了员工的心理变态与他们的反工作行为(CWB)之间的曲线关系。在对自恋和马基雅维利主义进行控制的同时,我们的预测在涉及两个国家的三项研究中得到了证实。具体来说,我们发现,在心理变态程度较高的个体中,心理变态的破坏性会随着 CWB 水平的提高而放大。这些结果解决了文献中混杂和出乎意料的发现,从而提供了对心理变态与 CWB 关系更细致入微的理解。此外,我们还借鉴了特质激活理论,研究了社会环境的调节作用,这体现在与同事的关系冲突和滥用性监督上。研究结果支持了调节假设,即在消极的社会环境中,无论是自评还是他评的 CWB 评估结果,心理变态-CWB 曲线关系都更强。由于个体的阴暗特质与行为结果之间的关系可能比简单的线性关系更为复杂,因此我们主张未来的研究应结合互补的理论视角,以提高理论的精确性。
{"title":"Rotten apples in bad barrels: Psychopathy, counterproductive work behavior, and the role of social context","authors":"Min Z. Carter,&nbsp;Michael S. Cole,&nbsp;Jeremy B. Bernerth,&nbsp;Peter D. Harms,&nbsp;Aric Wilhau,&nbsp;Joshua C. Palmer","doi":"10.1002/job.2783","DOIUrl":"10.1002/job.2783","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>There is an inherent interest in the implications of psychopathic employees, although attention, to date, is more pronounced in public media than in the scientific literature. In this study, we use behavioral threshold theory to propose a curvilinear relationship between employees' psychopathy and their counterproductive work behavior (CWB). Our predictions were corroborated across three studies involving two countries while controlling for narcissism and Machiavellianism. Specifically, we find that the destructive nature of psychopathy is amplified with accelerated levels of CWB among individuals high on psychopathy. These results address mixed and unexpected findings in the literature, thereby offering a more nuanced understanding of the psychopathy–CWB relationship. Drawing additionally on trait activation theory, we examine the moderating effects of social context as manifested in relationship conflict with coworkers and abusive supervision. Results support the moderated hypotheses such that the psychopathy–CWB curvilinear relationship is stronger in negative social environments for both self-rated and other-rated CWB assessments. As the relationships between individuals' dark traits and behavioral outcomes are likely more complex than simple linear relations, we advocate future research to combine complementary theoretical lenses for improved theoretical precision.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140076543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Inclusion near and far: A qualitative investigation of inclusive organizational behavior across work modalities and social identities 远近包容:跨工作模式和社会身份的包容性组织行为定性调查
IF 6.8 2区 管理学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI: 10.1002/job.2779
Lindsay Y. Dhanani, Mohsin Sultan, Carolyn T. Pham, Keisuke Mikami, Daniel Ryan Charles, Hannah A. Crandell
SummaryThough there are clear benefits of being included at work, important questions about employees' views and experiences of workplace inclusion remain unanswered. First, scholars have tended to adopt a one‐size‐fits‐all approach that assumes that inclusion is viewed and experienced similarly by all employees, regardless of their social identities. Moreover, there have been rapid shifts in work modalities over the last few years, and it is currently unclear how modality impacts inclusion and if that impact is similar across all employees. To address these questions, we leveraged qualitative data from a demographically diverse sample to examine how employees define workplace inclusion, what practices and behaviors employees associate with feeling included, how social identities shape definitions and experiences of inclusion, and the modalities in which employees feel the most included. Results indicated that employees primarily define workplace inclusion as being accepted and treated equally regardless of their identities, being integrated into decision‐making, and expressing themselves authentically. Though employees defined inclusion similarly regardless of their social identities, the importance of specific inclusion practices differed across subgroups. Finally, employees felt more included when working in person, though minoritized employees were more likely to prefer remote work. Theoretical and practical implications regarding inclusion are discussed.
摘要尽管工作中的包容有明显的好处,但有关员工对工作场所包容的看法和体验的重要问题仍未得到解答。首先,学者们倾向于采用 "一刀切 "的方法,假定所有员工,无论其社会身份如何,对包容的看法和体验都是相似的。此外,在过去几年中,工作模式发生了迅速变化,目前还不清楚工作模式如何影响包容性,以及这种影响是否对所有员工都相似。为了解决这些问题,我们利用来自不同人群样本的定性数据,研究了员工如何定义工作场所的包容性、员工将哪些实践和行为与融入感联系在一起、社会身份如何影响包容性的定义和体验,以及员工最有融入感的工作模式。结果表明,员工对工作场所包容性的主要定义是,无论其身份如何,都能被接受并受到平等对待,能融入决策,以及能真实地表达自己。尽管员工对包容的定义与他们的社会身份类似,但在不同的亚群体中,具体包容做法的重要性却有所不同。最后,尽管少数族裔员工更倾向于远程工作,但他们在亲自工作时更能感受到融入感。本文讨论了包容性的理论和实践意义。
{"title":"Inclusion near and far: A qualitative investigation of inclusive organizational behavior across work modalities and social identities","authors":"Lindsay Y. Dhanani, Mohsin Sultan, Carolyn T. Pham, Keisuke Mikami, Daniel Ryan Charles, Hannah A. Crandell","doi":"10.1002/job.2779","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2779","url":null,"abstract":"SummaryThough there are clear benefits of being included at work, important questions about employees' views and experiences of workplace inclusion remain unanswered. First, scholars have tended to adopt a one‐size‐fits‐all approach that assumes that inclusion is viewed and experienced similarly by all employees, regardless of their social identities. Moreover, there have been rapid shifts in work modalities over the last few years, and it is currently unclear how modality impacts inclusion and if that impact is similar across all employees. To address these questions, we leveraged qualitative data from a demographically diverse sample to examine how employees define workplace inclusion, what practices and behaviors employees associate with feeling included, how social identities shape definitions and experiences of inclusion, and the modalities in which employees feel the most included. Results indicated that employees primarily define workplace inclusion as being accepted and treated equally regardless of their identities, being integrated into decision‐making, and expressing themselves authentically. Though employees defined inclusion similarly regardless of their social identities, the importance of specific inclusion practices differed across subgroups. Finally, employees felt more included when working in person, though minoritized employees were more likely to prefer remote work. Theoretical and practical implications regarding inclusion are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140025256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Promotion focus is valued in men more than in women 男性比女性更重视晋升
IF 6.8 2区 管理学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI: 10.1002/job.2781
Dinah Gutermuth, Melvyn R. W. Hamstra

In this research, we test the hypothesis that promotion-focused eagerness does not yield the same evaluative benefits in the workplace for women as it does for men. Regulatory focus theory suggests that promotion-focused eagerness potentially casts a person in a favorable light in the eyes of superiors. Nevertheless, we propose that promotion-focused eagerness violates the prescriptive gender-stereotypical expectations that people have of women. The gender deviance (i.e., not acting in line with gender expectations) that occurs when a woman is promotion-focused causes this woman to pay a “gender tax” that a promotion-focused man does not pay. First, we conducted two experiments wherein managers (N = 127) or students (N = 236) evaluated qualified fictional job applicants: in both experiments, compared with an identical male applicant, the promotion-focused female job applicant was valued less, as evidenced by a lower starting salary offer. Second, in a dyadic study (N = 474 dyads), male employees' promotion focus was positively associated with their manager's evaluations of them, whereas female employees' promotion focus was not. Our results show that promotion-focused women are not valued as positively as their male counterparts.

在这项研究中,我们检验了这样一个假设,即女性在职场中的晋升焦虑并不会像男性一样带来评价上的好处。监管焦点理论认为,注重晋升的渴望可能会让一个人在上级眼中处于有利地位。然而,我们认为,晋升渴望违反了人们对女性的性别陈规定型期望。当女性以晋升为重点时,其性别偏差(即行为不符合性别期望)会导致该女性支付 "性别税",而以晋升为重点的男性则不需要支付这种税。首先,我们进行了两项实验,让经理(N = 127)或学生(N = 236)对合格的虚构求职者进行评估:在这两项实验中,与相同的男性求职者相比,注重晋升的女性求职者的价值较低,表现为起薪较低。其次,在一项双人研究(N = 474 人)中,男性员工的晋升焦点与经理对他们的评价呈正相关,而女性员工的晋升焦点则与之无关。我们的研究结果表明,注重晋升的女性并不像她们的男性同事那样得到积极的评价。
{"title":"Promotion focus is valued in men more than in women","authors":"Dinah Gutermuth,&nbsp;Melvyn R. W. Hamstra","doi":"10.1002/job.2781","DOIUrl":"10.1002/job.2781","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In this research, we test the hypothesis that promotion-focused eagerness does not yield the same evaluative benefits in the workplace for women as it does for men. Regulatory focus theory suggests that promotion-focused eagerness potentially casts a person in a favorable light in the eyes of superiors. Nevertheless, we propose that promotion-focused eagerness violates the prescriptive gender-stereotypical expectations that people have of women. The gender deviance (i.e., not acting in line with gender expectations) that occurs when a woman is promotion-focused causes this woman to pay a “gender tax” that a promotion-focused man does not pay. First, we conducted two experiments wherein managers (<i>N</i> = 127) or students (<i>N</i> = 236) evaluated qualified fictional job applicants: in both experiments, compared with an identical male applicant, the promotion-focused female job applicant was valued less, as evidenced by a lower starting salary offer. Second, in a dyadic study (<i>N</i> = 474 dyads), male employees' promotion focus was positively associated with their manager's evaluations of them, whereas female employees' promotion focus was not. Our results show that promotion-focused women are not valued as positively as their male counterparts.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140001938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The multilevel well-being paradox: Towards an integrative process theory of coping in teams 多层次幸福悖论:迈向团队应对的综合过程理论
IF 6.8 2区 管理学 Q1 Social Sciences Pub Date : 2024-02-28 DOI: 10.1002/job.2782
Emma Nordbäck, Niina Nurmi, Jennifer L. Gibbs, Maggie Boyraz, Minna Logemann

Contemporary work teams are increasingly faced with external pressures and changing demands that thrust them into stressful conditions that require coping to maintain not only performance but also well-being. In this paper, we treat the COVID-19 pandemic as an extreme case of multilevel stressors and coping in teams to investigate how teams and their members simultaneously cope with stressors at both individual and team levels and the impacts this has on their well-being. We conducted a longitudinal qualitative multi-case study involving 12 teams, utilizing data from 69 members collected through diaries, interviews, and surveys over a period of 6 months. Our findings illustrate how the needs and coping efforts of teams and individuals can sometimes conflict, resulting in opposing states of well-being at different levels. We frame this phenomenon as the multilevel well-being paradox. Our emergent process model of multilevel coping in teams suggests that teams thrive when they establish a shared appraisal of stressors and coping options through active team reflection, and when they adopt coping approaches that align with the specific stressors experienced at both levels. This study advances our understanding of coping in teams by illuminating the intricate interplay between team and individual well-being and highlighting the paradoxical nature of this relationship.

当代的工作团队越来越多地面临着外部压力和不断变化的需求,这些压力和需求将团队推入了需要应对的紧张状态,不仅要保持工作绩效,还要保持身心健康。在本文中,我们将 COVID-19 大流行病作为团队中多层次压力和应对的极端案例,研究团队及其成员如何同时应对个人和团队层面的压力,以及这对他们的幸福感产生的影响。我们进行了一项纵向定性多案例研究,涉及 12 个团队,利用通过日记、访谈和调查收集到的 69 名成员的数据,历时 6 个月。我们的研究结果表明,团队和个人的需求和应对努力有时会发生冲突,从而导致不同层面的幸福状态截然相反。我们将这种现象称为多层次幸福悖论。我们的团队多层次应对新兴过程模型表明,当团队通过积极的团队反思建立起对压力和应对方案的共同评估,并采取与两个层面所经历的特定压力相一致的应对方法时,团队就会茁壮成长。这项研究阐明了团队和个人福祉之间错综复杂的相互作用,并强调了这种关系的矛盾性,从而加深了我们对团队应对方法的理解。
{"title":"The multilevel well-being paradox: Towards an integrative process theory of coping in teams","authors":"Emma Nordbäck,&nbsp;Niina Nurmi,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Gibbs,&nbsp;Maggie Boyraz,&nbsp;Minna Logemann","doi":"10.1002/job.2782","DOIUrl":"10.1002/job.2782","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Contemporary work teams are increasingly faced with external pressures and changing demands that thrust them into stressful conditions that require coping to maintain not only performance but also well-being. In this paper, we treat the COVID-19 pandemic as an extreme case of multilevel stressors and coping in teams to investigate how teams and their members simultaneously cope with stressors at both individual and team levels and the impacts this has on their well-being. We conducted a longitudinal qualitative multi-case study involving 12 teams, utilizing data from 69 members collected through diaries, interviews, and surveys over a period of 6 months. Our findings illustrate how the needs and coping efforts of teams and individuals can sometimes conflict, resulting in opposing states of well-being at different levels. We frame this phenomenon as the <i>multilevel well-being paradox</i>. Our emergent process model of multilevel coping in teams suggests that teams thrive when they establish a shared appraisal of stressors and coping options through active team reflection, and when they adopt coping approaches that align with the specific stressors experienced at both levels. This study advances our understanding of coping in teams by illuminating the intricate interplay between team and individual well-being and highlighting the paradoxical nature of this relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/job.2782","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140001798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Organizational Behavior
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1