Pub Date : 2025-11-12DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2025.104920
Tara Driskill , Brandon K. Watanabe , Annmarie MacNamara
Although positive emotion up-regulation via reappraisal increases electrocortical and subjective response to pictures, little is known about how situational factors may moderate its success. For instance, emotion regulation must at times be performed shortly after a cognitively demanding event. Here, we set out to determine whether positive emotion up-regulation would be compromised if performed after a difficult math task (hard math; n = 39) versus after an easy math task (easy math; n = 39). After randomly assigning participants to groups, we assessed reappraisal's effectiveness using the late positive potential (LPP) as a measure of picture salience and picture ratings. Results showed that positive emotion up-regulation via reappraisal was unaffected by math difficulty. Nonetheless, participants who had just completed a hard math task showed smaller LPPs overall, compared to those who had completed the easy math task. In contrast to prior work, across both math groups, reappraisal was only effective for neutral and not positive pictures. Therefore, recent prior cognitive demand does not appear to compromise reappraisal of neutral pictures, yet it remains possible that any recent demanding task (i.e., either high or low load) may compromise up-regulation for stimuli that are closer to ceiling – i.e., positive stimuli. Results are discussed in the context of a situation-specific approach to emotion regulation and the utility of positive emotion up-regulation in everyday life. Findings also suggest possible a mechanism underlying blunted response to stimuli, as has been observed in some forms of internalizing psychopathology.
{"title":"Positive emotion up-regulation in the wake of a cognitively demanding task: An event-related potential study","authors":"Tara Driskill , Brandon K. Watanabe , Annmarie MacNamara","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104920","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104920","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although positive emotion up-regulation via reappraisal increases electrocortical and subjective response to pictures, little is known about how situational factors may moderate its success. For instance, emotion regulation must at times be performed shortly after a cognitively demanding event. Here, we set out to determine whether positive emotion up-regulation would be compromised if performed after a difficult math task (hard math; <em>n</em> = 39) versus after an easy math task (easy math; <em>n</em> = 39). After randomly assigning participants to groups, we assessed reappraisal's effectiveness using the late positive potential (LPP) as a measure of picture salience and picture ratings. Results showed that positive emotion up-regulation via reappraisal was unaffected by math difficulty. Nonetheless, participants who had just completed a hard math task showed smaller LPPs overall, compared to those who had completed the easy math task. In contrast to prior work, across both math groups, reappraisal was only effective for neutral and not positive pictures. Therefore, recent prior cognitive demand does not appear to compromise reappraisal of neutral pictures, yet it remains possible that any recent demanding task (i.e., either high or low load) may compromise up-regulation for stimuli that are closer to ceiling – i.e., positive stimuli. Results are discussed in the context of a situation-specific approach to emotion regulation and the utility of positive emotion up-regulation in everyday life. Findings also suggest possible a mechanism underlying blunted response to stimuli, as has been observed in some forms of internalizing psychopathology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104920"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145551636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-12DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2025.104915
Lauren Stavropoulos , Isaac Sabel , David D.J. Cooper , Jill M. Newby , Jessica G. Grisham
Background
Generalized anxiety disorder is characterised by aversive mental images of feared outcomes. This study investigated whether a single session of imagery rescripting would produce greater reductions in anxious response, threat appraisals, and intrusive images regarding a feared event than imaginal exposure among individuals high in trait worry.
Methods
Undergraduate participants (N = 89) high in trait worry attended a 45-min video-call session with a psychologist in which they identified a worry image, rated their anxiety, worry, threat appraisals, and imagery-related distress, and were randomised to 15-min therapist-guided imagery rescripting or imaginal exposure. Imagery rescripting involved rewriting the worry image to achieve a positive outcome. Participants were asked to listen to a recording of the exercise on three days and provided outcome ratings after 1 week.
Results
Linear mixed effect modelling revealed both conditions produced medium-to-large decreases in worry, anxiety, threat appraisals, and frequency and distress associated with worry images between baseline and 1-week post-intervention (ds = 0.54-0.2.33). Results were comparable between conditions, and the study hypotheses predicting that imagery rescripting would produce greater reductions in outcome variables than imaginal exposure were not supported.
Conclusion
A novel, future-oriented imagery rescripting intervention produced comparable effects to imaginal exposure in improving participants’ anxious response, threat appraisals, and intrusive imagery regarding their worries 1 week later. However, the intervention was not superior to imaginal exposure as predicted. Future studies may further investigate longer term outcomes and mechanisms of change of imagery rescripting for worry, and apply imagery rescripting with clinical samples and comparison to additional comparator conditions.
{"title":"Brief imagery rescripting is equivalent to imaginal exposure in improving response to worry images among high worry individuals","authors":"Lauren Stavropoulos , Isaac Sabel , David D.J. Cooper , Jill M. Newby , Jessica G. Grisham","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104915","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104915","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Generalized anxiety disorder is characterised by aversive mental images of feared outcomes. This study investigated whether a single session of imagery rescripting would produce greater reductions in anxious response, threat appraisals, and intrusive images regarding a feared event than imaginal exposure among individuals high in trait worry.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Undergraduate participants (N = 89) high in trait worry attended a 45-min video-call session with a psychologist in which they identified a worry image, rated their anxiety, worry, threat appraisals, and imagery-related distress, and were randomised to 15-min therapist-guided imagery rescripting or imaginal exposure. Imagery rescripting involved rewriting the worry image to achieve a positive outcome. Participants were asked to listen to a recording of the exercise on three days and provided outcome ratings after 1 week.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Linear mixed effect modelling revealed both conditions produced medium-to-large decreases in worry, anxiety, threat appraisals, and frequency and distress associated with worry images between baseline and 1-week post-intervention (<em>d</em>s = 0.54-0.2.33). Results were comparable between conditions, and the study hypotheses predicting that imagery rescripting would produce greater reductions in outcome variables than imaginal exposure were not supported.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A novel, future-oriented imagery rescripting intervention produced comparable effects to imaginal exposure in improving participants’ anxious response, threat appraisals, and intrusive imagery regarding their worries 1 week later. However, the intervention was not superior to imaginal exposure as predicted. Future studies may further investigate longer term outcomes and mechanisms of change of imagery rescripting for worry, and apply imagery rescripting with clinical samples and comparison to additional comparator conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104915"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145528296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-11DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2025.104918
Wencke Donath , Ernst H.W. Koster , Rafaële J.C. Huntjens , Matt Field , Peter J. de Jong
Clinically derived theoretical models of dissociative identity disorder (DID) suggest that these individuals experience shifts in cognitive functioning between identity states. While prior research has found no objective inter-identity differences in memory, the present study investigated whether such differences are evident in a related cognitive domain: attentional processing. It was hypothesized that individuals with DID would exhibit differences in their attentional bias (AB) toward concern-related stimuli. They were compared to individuals with PTSD who experienced interpersonal childhood trauma, simulators enacting different identity states, and non-clinical adults. Based on cognitive models in anxiety, individuals with PTSD were expected to show a vigilance-avoidance AB pattern for concern-related stimuli. Non-clinical comparisons were expected to show a weaker AB effect than the clinical groups. Participants (n = 95) completed a visual spatial dot-probe task with both short (200 ms) and long (1250 ms) exposure conditions, displaying angry (i.e., concern-related stimuli) and happy facial expressions (i.e., control stimuli). In addition, participants completed post-task measures of state anxiety and state dissociation. The results did not reveal significant AB differences between identity states in individuals with DID, although differences were observed between identity states in the simulator group. Moreover, no significant AB differences were found between individuals with DID, PTSD, and non-clinical groups. State anxiety and state dissociation scores were not significantly related to AB scores. Findings provided no support for shifts in attentional processing between identity states in DID. Furthermore, we found no evidence for a hypervigilant-avoidant AB pattern for concern-related stimuli in PTSD.
{"title":"Attentional processing of concern-related stimuli in dissociative identity disorder: No evidence for inter-identity differences","authors":"Wencke Donath , Ernst H.W. Koster , Rafaële J.C. Huntjens , Matt Field , Peter J. de Jong","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104918","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104918","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Clinically derived theoretical models of dissociative identity disorder (DID) suggest that these individuals experience shifts in cognitive functioning between identity states. While prior research has found no objective inter-identity differences in memory, the present study investigated whether such differences are evident in a related cognitive domain: attentional processing. It was hypothesized that individuals with DID would exhibit differences in their attentional bias (AB) toward concern-related stimuli. They were compared to individuals with PTSD who experienced interpersonal childhood trauma, simulators enacting different identity states, and non-clinical adults. Based on cognitive models in anxiety, individuals with PTSD were expected to show a vigilance-avoidance AB pattern for concern-related stimuli. Non-clinical comparisons were expected to show a weaker AB effect than the clinical groups. Participants (<em>n</em> = 95) completed a visual spatial dot-probe task with both short (200 ms) and long (1250 ms) exposure conditions, displaying angry (i.e., concern-related stimuli) and happy facial expressions (i.e., control stimuli). In addition, participants completed post-task measures of state anxiety and state dissociation. The results did not reveal significant AB differences between identity states in individuals with DID, although differences were observed between identity states in the simulator group. Moreover, no significant AB differences were found between individuals with DID, PTSD, and non-clinical groups. State anxiety and state dissociation scores were not significantly related to AB scores. Findings provided no support for shifts in attentional processing between identity states in DID. Furthermore, we found no evidence for a hypervigilant-avoidant AB pattern for concern-related stimuli in PTSD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104918"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145524547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-11DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2025.104919
Jaime Delgadillo , Victoria Laker , Melanie Simmonds-Buckley , Amy Southgate , Laura Parkhouse , Ben Davis , Jessica Furlong-Silva , Nicole King , Sarah Keeble , Oliver Davis , Poppy Royal , Mike Lucock , Elisa Aguirre , Richard Thwaites , Beverley Flint , Thomas Osborne , Fiona Bell , Madeleine Devon , Michael Barkham
Background
Occupational burnout affects between 11 % and 30 % of healthcare professionals and is associated with staff sickness, job turnover, increased costs and poorer quality of care. This study aimed to compare the effects of two theoretically distinctive interventions for burnout in healthcare professionals.
Methods
This multi-site randomised non-inferiority trial recruited 465 healthcare professionals working across 20 National Health Service (NHS) providers in England. Recruitment took place between October 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021. Participants were randomly assigned to digital health interventions based on cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT; n = 227) or job crafting (JC; n = 238), each of which lasted 6-weeks and involved participation in weekly webinars (1hr) supplemented by online coping skills modules. The primary outcome (Oldenburg Burnout Inventory) was measured at baseline, after 6 weeks, and after 6 months. Between-group differences were compared using analysis of covariance adjusting for baseline measures, testing a non-inferiority hypothesis.
Results
At 6 weeks, the adjusted mean difference of 0.47 (95 % CI: –0.25 to 1.20; p = .197) in the OLBI favoured CBT. Although this difference was not statistically significant, the non-inferiority hypothesis was not supported based on a pre-specified minimum clinically important difference. At 6 months, the adjusted mean difference favoured CBT indicating superiority; 0.80 (95 % CI: 0.05 to 1.54; p = .036).
Conclusions
Brief digital health interventions can help to improve occupational burnout and well-being in healthcare professionals. CBT was more effective than JC.
职业倦怠影响11%至30%的医疗保健专业人员,并与员工生病、工作人员流动、成本增加和护理质量下降有关。本研究旨在比较两种理论上不同的干预措施对医护人员职业倦怠的影响。方法:本多地点随机非劣效性试验招募了465名医疗保健专业人员,他们来自英国20家国民健康服务(NHS)提供商。招聘时间为2020年10月1日至2021年6月30日。参与者被随机分配到基于认知行为疗法(CBT; n = 227)或工作制定(JC; n = 238)的数字健康干预中,每项干预持续6周,包括参加每周一次的网络研讨会(1小时),并辅以在线应对技能模块。在基线、6周后和6个月后测量主要结局(Oldenburg Burnout Inventory)。采用协方差分析比较组间差异,调整基线测量,检验非劣效性假设。结果6周后,OLBI患者的调整后平均差值为0.47 (95% CI: -0.25 ~ 1.20; p = 0.197)。虽然这一差异在统计学上不显著,但非劣效性假设并未基于预先指定的最小临床重要差异得到支持。在6个月时,调整后的平均差异有利于CBT,表明CBT具有优势;0.80 (95% CI: 0.05 ~ 1.54; p = 0.036)。结论简单的数字健康干预有助于改善医护人员的职业倦怠和幸福感。CBT比JC更有效。
{"title":"Digital health interventions for occupational burnout in healthcare professionals: a multi-site randomised non-inferiority trial","authors":"Jaime Delgadillo , Victoria Laker , Melanie Simmonds-Buckley , Amy Southgate , Laura Parkhouse , Ben Davis , Jessica Furlong-Silva , Nicole King , Sarah Keeble , Oliver Davis , Poppy Royal , Mike Lucock , Elisa Aguirre , Richard Thwaites , Beverley Flint , Thomas Osborne , Fiona Bell , Madeleine Devon , Michael Barkham","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104919","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104919","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Occupational burnout affects between 11 % and 30 % of healthcare professionals and is associated with staff sickness, job turnover, increased costs and poorer quality of care. This study aimed to compare the effects of two theoretically distinctive interventions for burnout in healthcare professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This multi-site randomised non-inferiority trial recruited 465 healthcare professionals working across 20 National Health Service (NHS) providers in England. Recruitment took place between October 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021. Participants were randomly assigned to digital health interventions based on cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT; n = 227) or job crafting (JC; n = 238), each of which lasted 6-weeks and involved participation in weekly webinars (1hr) supplemented by online coping skills modules. The primary outcome (Oldenburg Burnout Inventory) was measured at baseline, after 6 weeks, and after 6 months. Between-group differences were compared using analysis of covariance adjusting for baseline measures, testing a non-inferiority hypothesis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At 6 weeks, the adjusted mean difference of 0.47 (95 % CI: –0.25 to 1.20; <em>p</em> = .197) in the OLBI favoured CBT. Although this difference was not statistically significant, the non-inferiority hypothesis was not supported based on a pre-specified minimum clinically important difference. At 6 months, the adjusted mean difference favoured CBT indicating superiority; 0.80 (95 % CI: 0.05 to 1.54; <em>p</em> = .036).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Brief digital health interventions can help to improve occupational burnout and well-being in healthcare professionals. CBT was more effective than JC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104919"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145528298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-10DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2025.104913
Arnoud Arntz
Imagery Rescripting (ImRs) is a transdiagnostic technique to treat aversive memories of real (traumatic) experiences, or of aversive fantasies, such as nightmares and future projections. ImRs is getting increasingly popular, and can be used either as a standalone treatment or as part of treatment packages consisting of different techniques. It has been more than 25 years ago that a detailed treatment protocol of Imagery Rescripting (ImRs) was published (Arntz, A., & Weertman, A. (1999). Treatment of childhood memories; theory and practice. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37(8), 715–740). New clinical and research insights have led to changes in the protocol, and large scale studies are based on this updated protocol. The most important changes include that it is now strongly recommended that the therapist does the rescripting in the first sessions, while the patient does the rescripting during the later sessions; and that the rescripting should start at the most difficult moment of the memory (the “hotspot”). Moreover, a standard series of questions helps to deepen the emotional processing, while specific ingredients of the rescripting help to increase the impact of the corrective experience offered by the technique. This paper presents and discusses the updated protocol as it has been developed and tested in the treatment of childhood trauma. It also offers solutions for possible problems that can be encountered in clinical practice, and discusses variations of the technique, including how to apply it to adulthood trauma's, to nightmares, and to a range of disorders and clinical problems, including pathological grief, and feared future catastrophes. It is explained that the working mechanism does not rely on installing false memories, and how therapists can prevent that false memories are installed. Finally, the paper provides a set of practical appendices including a treatment rationale and a handout that can be given to patients.
意象重塑(ImRs)是一种跨诊断技术,用于治疗真实(创伤)经历或厌恶幻想(如噩梦和未来预测)的厌恶记忆。磁共振成像越来越受欢迎,既可以作为单独的治疗方法,也可以作为由不同技术组成的治疗方案的一部分。早在25年前,一份详细的图像改写(ImRs)治疗方案就已出版(Arntz, a ., & Weertman, a .(1999))。童年记忆的治疗;理论与实践。行为研究与治疗,37(8),715-740)。新的临床和研究见解导致了方案的变化,大规模的研究是基于这一更新的方案。最重要的变化包括,现在强烈建议治疗师在第一次治疗中进行重新处方,而患者在随后的治疗中进行重新处方;重写应该从记忆中最困难的时刻(“热点”)开始。此外,一系列标准的问题有助于加深情绪处理,而重写的具体成分有助于增加技术提供的纠正体验的影响。本文提出并讨论了更新的协议,因为它已经开发和测试在治疗儿童创伤。它还为临床实践中可能遇到的问题提供了解决方案,并讨论了该技术的各种变体,包括如何将其应用于成人创伤,噩梦以及一系列疾病和临床问题,包括病理性悲伤和对未来灾难的恐惧。它解释了工作机制不依赖于安装错误记忆,以及治疗师如何防止错误记忆的安装。最后,本文提供了一套实用的附录,包括治疗原理和讲义,可以给病人。
{"title":"Imagery Rescripting: an update of the treatment protocol","authors":"Arnoud Arntz","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104913","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104913","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Imagery Rescripting (ImRs) is a transdiagnostic technique to treat aversive memories of real (traumatic) experiences, or of aversive fantasies, such as nightmares and future projections. ImRs is getting increasingly popular, and can be used either as a standalone treatment or as part of treatment packages consisting of different techniques. It has been more than 25 years ago that a detailed treatment protocol of Imagery Rescripting (ImRs) was published (Arntz, A., & Weertman, A. (1999). Treatment of childhood memories; theory and practice. <em>Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37(8),</em> 715–740). New clinical and research insights have led to changes in the protocol, and large scale studies are based on this updated protocol. The most important changes include that it is now strongly recommended that the therapist does the rescripting in the first sessions, while the patient does the rescripting during the later sessions; and that the rescripting should start at the most difficult moment of the memory (the “hotspot”). Moreover, a standard series of questions helps to deepen the emotional processing, while specific ingredients of the rescripting help to increase the impact of the corrective experience offered by the technique. This paper presents and discusses the updated protocol as it has been developed and tested in the treatment of childhood trauma. It also offers solutions for possible problems that can be encountered in clinical practice, and discusses variations of the technique, including how to apply it to adulthood trauma's, to nightmares, and to a range of disorders and clinical problems, including pathological grief, and feared future catastrophes. It is explained that the working mechanism does not rely on installing false memories, and how therapists can prevent that false memories are installed. Finally, the paper provides a set of practical appendices including a treatment rationale and a handout that can be given to patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104913"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145574888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-07DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2025.104912
Marieke C. ten Napel-Schutz , Simona Karbouniaris , Suzanne H.W. Mares , Tineke A. Abma , Arnoud Arntz
Background
Trauma-focused therapies like Imagery Rescripting (ImRs) are seldom offered to patients who are underweight with comorbid eating disorders (uED) and PTSD, due to doubts about their emotional and cognitive capacities. However, high rates of PTSD comorbidity in this group highlight the need for tailored trauma interventions. This study examines therapists’ experiences applying ImRs in this population, with a focus on specific challenges and how Peer Group Supervision sessions (PGSs) supported treatment delivery.
Method
A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted using 11 semi-structured therapist interviews and 32 PGS recordings. Data were analyzed, summarized and classified within a thematic framework.
Results
Therapists initially used PGSs to validate their application of ImRs. Over time, PGSs facilitated skills development through role-play, peer exchange, and reflective dialogue. Four main themes emerged: 1) determining the right moment to start rescripting; 2) challenges specific to uED; 3) topics related to ImRs sessions in which patients had to rescript; 4) the therapists' progress.
Conclusion
With appropriate protocol modifications and PGSs, ImRs appears both feasible and valuable for uED patients with PTSD. This study aims to inform the feasibility of applying ImRs in this population, with a focus on specific challenges and practical suggestions that supported treatment delivery.
Trial registration
International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (NTR6094), registered 09/23/2016.
{"title":"Implementing Adjunct Trauma-Focused Imagery Rescripting in Inpatient Treatment for patients who are underweight with comorbid eating disorders and PTSD: Therapist Challenges and the Supporting Role of Peer Group Supervision","authors":"Marieke C. ten Napel-Schutz , Simona Karbouniaris , Suzanne H.W. Mares , Tineke A. Abma , Arnoud Arntz","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104912","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104912","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Trauma-focused therapies like Imagery Rescripting (ImRs) are seldom offered to patients who are underweight with comorbid eating disorders (uED) and PTSD, due to doubts about their emotional and cognitive capacities. However, high rates of PTSD comorbidity in this group highlight the need for tailored trauma interventions. This study examines therapists’ experiences applying ImRs in this population, with a focus on specific challenges and how Peer Group Supervision sessions (PGSs) supported treatment delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted using 11 semi-structured therapist interviews and 32 PGS recordings. Data were analyzed, summarized and classified within a thematic framework.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Therapists initially used PGSs to validate their application of ImRs. Over time, PGSs facilitated skills development through role-play, peer exchange, and reflective dialogue. Four main themes emerged: 1) determining the right moment to start rescripting; 2) challenges specific to uED; 3) topics related to ImRs sessions in which patients had to rescript; 4) the therapists' progress.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>With appropriate protocol modifications and PGSs, ImRs appears both feasible and valuable for uED patients with PTSD. This study aims to inform the feasibility of applying ImRs in this population, with a focus on specific challenges and practical suggestions that supported treatment delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (NTR6094), registered 09/23/2016.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104912"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145507667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-05DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2025.104910
Marianne Skogbrott Birkeland , Silje Mørup Ormhaug , Adele M. Hayes , Tine K. Jensen
Background
Changing maladaptive trauma-related cognitions may be crucial in trauma-focused cognitive behaviour therapy (TF-CBT). We identified common maladaptive cognitions during TF-CBT's trauma narration and processing phase and examined their relationship with trauma type and post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). We also assessed whether maladaptive trauma-related cognitions (overgeneralization, assimilation), more balanced and functional cognitions (accommodation), and negative emotions during this phase of TF-CBT were associated with PTSS.
Methods
Adolescents exposed to multiple types of traumas (N = 87, mean age = 15.8 years, 78.3 % girls) received TF-CBT. The Change and Growth Experiences (CHANGE) coding system measured maladaptive trauma-related cognitions, accommodated beliefs, and negative emotions during the trauma narration and processing phase. We then categorized the maladaptive cognitions from the CHANGE coding according to predefined topics. Mixed-effects analyses were used to assess relationships between maladaptive cognitions, accommodation, in-session negative emotion, and PTSS.
Results
Maladaptive trauma-related cognitions primarily concerned trust, esteem, and guilt. Sexual violence was associated with trust, esteem, intimacy, and guilt cognitions. Trust and esteem-related cognitions significantly predicted higher levels of PTSS at posttreatment. Higher levels of maladaptive cognitions and negative in-session emotion also predicted higher posttreatment PTSS. Low in-session negative emotion appeared to amplify the negative impact of maladaptive cognitions on PTSS at posttreatment. Accommodation showed no association with PTSS.
Conclusions
Maladaptive trauma-related cognitions, particularly related to trust and esteem, were common and associated with higher levels of PTSS at posttreatment. Low emotional engagement during trauma processing may potentiate the negative effects of maladaptive cognitions on PTSS. Results suggest both emotional processing and cognitive change are important treatment pathways for youth with PTSS.
{"title":"Changing maladaptive trauma-related cognitions and emotional activation during trauma-focused cognitive behavior therapy: Thematic content and relationships with posttraumatic stress symptoms","authors":"Marianne Skogbrott Birkeland , Silje Mørup Ormhaug , Adele M. Hayes , Tine K. Jensen","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104910","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104910","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Changing maladaptive trauma-related cognitions may be crucial in trauma-focused cognitive behaviour therapy (TF-CBT). We identified common maladaptive cognitions during TF-CBT's trauma narration and processing phase and examined their relationship with trauma type and post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS). We also assessed whether maladaptive trauma-related cognitions (overgeneralization, assimilation), more balanced and functional cognitions (accommodation), and negative emotions during this phase of TF-CBT were associated with PTSS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adolescents exposed to multiple types of traumas (N = 87, mean age = 15.8 years, 78.3 % girls) received TF-CBT. The Change and Growth Experiences (CHANGE) coding system measured maladaptive trauma-related cognitions, accommodated beliefs, and negative emotions during the trauma narration and processing phase. We then categorized the maladaptive cognitions from the CHANGE coding according to predefined topics. Mixed-effects analyses were used to assess relationships between maladaptive cognitions, accommodation, in-session negative emotion, and PTSS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Maladaptive trauma-related cognitions primarily concerned trust, esteem, and guilt. Sexual violence was associated with trust, esteem, intimacy, and guilt cognitions. Trust and esteem-related cognitions significantly predicted higher levels of PTSS at posttreatment. Higher levels of maladaptive cognitions and negative in-session emotion also predicted higher posttreatment PTSS. Low in-session negative emotion appeared to amplify the negative impact of maladaptive cognitions on PTSS at posttreatment. Accommodation showed no association with PTSS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Maladaptive trauma-related cognitions, particularly related to trust and esteem, were common and associated with higher levels of PTSS at posttreatment. Low emotional engagement during trauma processing may potentiate the negative effects of maladaptive cognitions on PTSS. Results suggest both emotional processing and cognitive change are important treatment pathways for youth with PTSS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104910"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145574837","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-05DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2025.104911
Lindsey J. Franklin-Browne , Kathryn L. Modecki , Allison M. Waters
Exposure to natural disasters, such as bushfires, increases vulnerability for poor psychological outcomes. Large scale reviews have increased our understanding of risk factors associated with disaster related maladjustment, however this relationship remains unclear. This study examined the effect of exposure to resource loss in the post-bushfire disaster environment on fear learning and extinction pathways. Participants (70 adults; 73 % female, 17–58 years of age, M = 23.77, SD = 8.16) were randomly allocated to view scenes depicting post-bushfire resource loss (post-bushfire disaster group) or no disaster (community group) followed by all participants completing a discriminative Pavlovian conditioning task including habituation, conditioning, extinction, and retest phases. During acquisition, one shape (CS+) was paired with an aversive tone as the unconditioned stimulus (UCS) and another shape (CS-) was presented alone, while both CSs were presented alone during extinction and retest phases. Subjective ratings of fear, worry and sadness, were obtained before and after picture viewing and between learning task phases whilst ratings of CS pleasantness and arousal were obtained before and after learning task phases. Skin conductance responses (SCR) were recorded to the CSs during all phases. The post-bushfire disaster group reported more subjective fear, worry and sadness after viewing images relative to the community group. The post-bushfire disaster group also showed significantly larger orienting SCRs to both CSs during acquisition relative to the community group and significantly smaller orienting SCRs to both CSs and undifferentiated anticipatory SCRs during extinction relative to the community group. During retest, the post-bushfire disaster group exhibited significantly larger anticipatory SCRs to both CSs compared to the community group. There were no group differences in between phase ratings of CS+ and CS- unpleasantness and arousal and no group differences in subjective anxiety ratings between learning task phases. Exposure to post-bushfire resource loss may increase fear conditioning and generalisation to safe stimuli, impair safety learning, and increase reactivity when re-exposed to fear stimuli.
{"title":"Exposure to images of post-bushfire disaster impacts fear learning and extinction","authors":"Lindsey J. Franklin-Browne , Kathryn L. Modecki , Allison M. Waters","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104911","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104911","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Exposure to natural disasters, such as bushfires, increases vulnerability for poor psychological outcomes. Large scale reviews have increased our understanding of risk factors associated with disaster related maladjustment, however this relationship remains unclear. This study examined the effect of exposure to resource loss in the post-bushfire disaster environment on fear learning and extinction pathways. Participants (70 adults; 73 % female, 17–58 years of age, <em>M</em> = 23.77, <em>SD</em> = 8.16) were randomly allocated to view scenes depicting post-bushfire resource loss (post-bushfire disaster group) or no disaster (community group) followed by all participants completing a discriminative Pavlovian conditioning task including habituation, conditioning, extinction, and retest phases. During acquisition, one shape (CS+) was paired with an aversive tone as the unconditioned stimulus (UCS) and another shape (CS-) was presented alone, while both CSs were presented alone during extinction and retest phases. Subjective ratings of fear, worry and sadness, were obtained before and after picture viewing and between learning task phases whilst ratings of CS pleasantness and arousal were obtained before and after learning task phases. Skin conductance responses (SCR) were recorded to the CSs during all phases. The post-bushfire disaster group reported more subjective fear, worry and sadness after viewing images relative to the community group. The post-bushfire disaster group also showed significantly larger orienting SCRs to both CSs during acquisition relative to the community group and significantly smaller orienting SCRs to both CSs and undifferentiated anticipatory SCRs during extinction relative to the community group. During retest, the post-bushfire disaster group exhibited significantly larger anticipatory SCRs to both CSs compared to the community group. There were no group differences in between phase ratings of CS+ and CS- unpleasantness and arousal and no group differences in subjective anxiety ratings between learning task phases. Exposure to post-bushfire resource loss may increase fear conditioning and generalisation to safe stimuli, impair safety learning, and increase reactivity when re-exposed to fear stimuli.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104911"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145467149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-04DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2025.104909
Amelia Reynolds, Colin MacLeod, Ben Grafton
The present study examined whether people with high trait anxiety volitionally access proportionately more negative (than positive) information when interrogating available information concerning an approaching potential stressor during a period of expectancy updating. The present study also examined the role this negative interrogation bias plays in shaping trait anxiety-linked negative expectancy bias and elevated negative state affect. Participants low and high in trait anxiety (N = 311) were informed at the outset of the testing session that they may later view a potentially stressful film. Participants then completed a procedure designed to induce initial expectancies concerning the film viewing stressor. Subsequently, participants were provided the opportunity to update their initial expectancies by interrogating negative and positive information concerning the film viewing stressor. The proportion of negative information selected by each participant was taken as a measure of their negative interrogation bias. Measures of expectancies and state affect were taken before and after the induction of initial expectancies, and before and after the subsequent expectancy updating period. The results indicated that, during the expectancy updating period, participants high in trait anxiety displayed greater negative interrogation bias than participants low in trait anxiety. The results also revealed an indirect association between trait anxiety and elevation of negative state affect concurrent to expectancy updating period, which was serially mediated by negative interrogation bias during this period, and by concurrent elevation of negative expectancy bias. Findings are discussed with regards to potential implications for cognitive behavioural interventions for anxiety which seek to drive therapeutic change through the modification of expectancies.
{"title":"Trait anxiety-linked bias in expectancy updating: Examining the contributions of negative interrogation bias and negatively biased expectancy updating to elevated negative state affect when approaching potential stressors","authors":"Amelia Reynolds, Colin MacLeod, Ben Grafton","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104909","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104909","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present study examined whether people with high trait anxiety volitionally access proportionately more negative (than positive) information when interrogating available information concerning an approaching potential stressor during a period of expectancy updating. The present study also examined the role this <em>negative interrogation bias</em> plays in shaping trait anxiety-linked negative expectancy bias and elevated negative state affect. Participants low and high in trait anxiety (<em>N</em> = 311) were informed at the outset of the testing session that they may later view a potentially stressful film. Participants then completed a procedure designed to induce initial expectancies concerning the film viewing stressor. Subsequently, participants were provided the opportunity to update their initial expectancies by interrogating negative and positive information concerning the film viewing stressor. The proportion of negative information selected by each participant was taken as a measure of their negative interrogation bias. Measures of expectancies and state affect were taken before and after the induction of initial expectancies, and before and after the subsequent expectancy updating period. The results indicated that, during the expectancy updating period, participants high in trait anxiety displayed greater negative interrogation bias than participants low in trait anxiety. The results also revealed an indirect association between trait anxiety and elevation of negative state affect concurrent to expectancy updating period, which was serially mediated by negative interrogation bias during this period, and by concurrent elevation of negative expectancy bias. Findings are discussed with regards to potential implications for cognitive behavioural interventions for anxiety which seek to drive therapeutic change through the modification of expectancies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104909"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145467151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-02DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2025.104908
Lucas Marinack, Alexandria F. Sowers, Robert A. Kaya, Alicia R. Bachtel, Jenna L. Mohr, Joshua D. Clapp
Whereas attentional control has been proposed as a broad-based protective factor for PTSD, data suggest that elevated control may be paradoxically associated with increased symptoms, particularly in the presence of other risk factors. The current study examined the unique and interactive effects of attentional shifting (i.e., the transfer of attention across stimuli) and attentional focusing (i.e., the maintenance of attention on relevant targets) with experiential avoidance on posttrauma symptom clusters, accounting for potential nonlinearities in the influence of shifting and focusing dimensions. Shifting models in survivors of heterogeneous trauma (N = 252; 75 % female; 85.7 % White/Non-Hispanic) identified shifting as a moderator of the linear effect of experiential avoidance on CAPS-5 arousal-reactivity (β = −.16, p = .008), with experiential avoidance holding positive associations with arousal-reactivity through shifting scores reaching 2/3SD above the mean. Focusing models, by contrast, identified experiential avoidance as a moderator of the quadratic effect (x2) of focusing on CAPS-5 intrusions (β = .13, p = .010). Data failed to support effects of focusing at low levels of experiential avoidance (-1SD). A curvilinear effect of focusing emerged at average experiential avoidance, however, suggesting reductions in traumatic intrusions with increased focusing to mean values in the sample. At high experiential avoidance (+1SD), intrusions decreased with increases in focusing through average levels, but rebounded in response to focusing capabilities extending beyond the sample mean. Results are consistent with previous research suggesting nonlinearities in the effects of attentional control on posttrauma functioning and point to the importance of specific attentional processes in understanding avenues of risk and resilience.
虽然注意力控制被认为是创伤后应激障碍的一个广泛的保护因素,但数据表明,控制水平的提高可能与症状的增加相矛盾,特别是在存在其他风险因素的情况下。目前的研究考察了注意转移(即跨刺激的注意转移)和注意聚焦(即对相关目标的注意维持)与经验回避对创伤后症状集群的独特和相互作用,说明了转移和聚焦维度影响的潜在非线性。异质性创伤幸存者的移位模型(N = 252; 75%为女性;85.7%为白人/非西班牙裔)发现移位是经验回避对cap -5唤醒反应性线性效应的调节因子(β = - 0.16, p = 0.008),通过移位得分高于平均值2/3SD,经验回避与唤醒反应性保持正相关。相比之下,聚焦模型发现,经验回避是聚焦于cap -5入侵的二次效应(x2)的调节因子(β = 0.13, p = 0.010)。数据无法支持低水平的经验回避(-1SD)下的聚焦效应。然而,在平均经验回避中出现了聚焦的曲线效应,这表明随着样本中聚焦的增加,创伤性侵入的减少达到了平均值。在高经验回避(+1SD)水平下,干扰随着聚焦能力的增加而减少,但当聚焦能力超出样本平均值时,干扰会反弹。结果与先前的研究一致,表明注意控制对创伤后功能的影响呈非线性,并指出了特定注意过程在理解风险和恢复途径中的重要性。
{"title":"The unique impacts of attentional control and experiential avoidance on PTSD symptomatology: Moderation of nonlinear effects","authors":"Lucas Marinack, Alexandria F. Sowers, Robert A. Kaya, Alicia R. Bachtel, Jenna L. Mohr, Joshua D. Clapp","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104908","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104908","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Whereas attentional control has been proposed as a broad-based protective factor for PTSD, data suggest that elevated control may be paradoxically associated with increased symptoms, particularly in the presence of other risk factors. The current study examined the unique and interactive effects of attentional shifting (i.e., the transfer of attention across stimuli) and attentional focusing (i.e., the maintenance of attention on relevant targets) with experiential avoidance on posttrauma symptom clusters, accounting for potential nonlinearities in the influence of shifting and focusing dimensions. Shifting models in survivors of heterogeneous trauma (<em>N</em> = 252; 75 % female; 85.7 % White/Non-Hispanic) identified shifting as a moderator of the linear effect of experiential avoidance on CAPS-5 arousal-reactivity (β = −.16, <em>p</em> = .008), with experiential avoidance holding positive associations with arousal-reactivity through shifting scores reaching 2/3<em>SD</em> above the mean. Focusing models, by contrast, identified experiential avoidance as a moderator of the quadratic effect (x<sup>2</sup>) of focusing on CAPS-5 intrusions (β = .13, <em>p</em> = .010). Data failed to support effects of focusing at low levels of experiential avoidance (-1<em>SD</em>). A curvilinear effect of focusing emerged at average experiential avoidance, however, suggesting reductions in traumatic intrusions with increased focusing to mean values in the sample. At high experiential avoidance (+1<em>SD</em>), intrusions decreased with increases in focusing through average levels, but rebounded in response to focusing capabilities extending beyond the sample mean. Results are consistent with previous research suggesting nonlinearities in the effects of attentional control on posttrauma functioning and point to the importance of specific attentional processes in understanding avenues of risk and resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104908"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145497201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}