首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Psychology Review最新文献

英文 中文
Global PTSD prevalence among active first responders and trends over recent years: A systematic review and meta-analysis 全球创伤后应激障碍患病率在积极的第一响应者和趋势近年来:一个系统的回顾和荟萃分析
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-07-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102622
Andrew F. Arena , Mikayla Gregory , Daniel A.J. Collins , Bojana Vilus , Richard Bryant , Samuel B. Harvey , Mark Deady
First responders in emergency services are inherently exposed to potentially psychologically traumatic events, increasing their risk for PTSD, burnout, and work incapacity. The current meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively compare PTSD prevalence within varied first responders in the context of both routine exposures and large-scale disasters, assess trends over recent years and differences between economic contexts. In January 2025, five databases were searched for peer-reviewed observational studies on employed or volunteering samples. Publication date was limited to post-2008, given meta-analyses addressing similar questions captured literature until this point. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions explored trends over time and the impacts of exposure category, occupation, economic context, volunteer status, sex, and PTSD measurement. Analyses included 138 studies (173 independent samples). General samples with routine exposures possessed greater prevalence (14.3 %) than samples exposed to large-scale disasters (8.3 %). For the first time, there was some evidence of increasing prevalence over time within routine exposure samples. Low/middle-income countries and non-volunteers exhibited greater PTSD prevalence than high-income countries and volunteers. Prevalence varied based on PTSD outcome measurement, although no differences emerged between occupational and sex subgroups. Increasing PTSD prevalence over time appears to have been largely driven by increases observed since the COVID-19 pandemic, yet important questions remain regarding why prevalence has not decreased in relation to increasing efforts to support this population's mental health. All first responder occupations appear equally prone to PTSD, and thus equally in need of intervention. Workers in low/middle-income countries are particularly vulnerable to PTSD, potentially due to more limited resourcing.
急救服务的第一响应者天生就暴露在潜在的心理创伤事件中,增加了他们患创伤后应激障碍、倦怠和丧失工作能力的风险。当前的荟萃分析旨在全面比较常规暴露和大规模灾难背景下不同急救人员的PTSD患病率,评估近年来的趋势和经济背景之间的差异。2025年1月,在五个数据库中搜索了同行评议的关于受雇或志愿者样本的观察性研究。发表日期限于2008年后,因为元分析解决了类似的问题,并在此之前捕获了文献。随机效应荟萃分析和荟萃回归探讨了随时间变化的趋势以及暴露类别、职业、经济背景、志愿者状态、性别和创伤后应激障碍测量的影响。分析包括138项研究(173个独立样本)。常规暴露的一般样本的患病率(14.3 %)高于暴露于大规模灾害的样本(8.3 %)。这是第一次有证据表明,在常规接触样本中,随着时间的推移,患病率增加。中低收入国家和非志愿者的PTSD患病率高于高收入国家和志愿者。尽管职业亚组和性别亚组之间没有差异,但PTSD的患病率因结果测量而有所不同。随着时间的推移,创伤后应激障碍患病率的上升似乎在很大程度上是由COVID-19大流行以来观察到的上升所驱动的,但关于为什么在支持这一人群心理健康的努力不断加大的情况下,患病率没有下降,仍然存在重要问题。所有的第一反应职业似乎都同样容易出现PTSD,因此同样需要干预。低收入/中等收入国家的工人特别容易患创伤后应激障碍,可能是由于资源更有限。
{"title":"Global PTSD prevalence among active first responders and trends over recent years: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Andrew F. Arena ,&nbsp;Mikayla Gregory ,&nbsp;Daniel A.J. Collins ,&nbsp;Bojana Vilus ,&nbsp;Richard Bryant ,&nbsp;Samuel B. Harvey ,&nbsp;Mark Deady","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102622","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102622","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>First responders in emergency services are inherently exposed to potentially psychologically traumatic events, increasing their risk for PTSD, burnout, and work incapacity. The current meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively compare PTSD prevalence within varied first responders in the context of both routine exposures and large-scale disasters, assess trends over recent years and differences between economic contexts. In January 2025, five databases were searched for peer-reviewed observational studies on employed or volunteering samples. Publication date was limited to post-2008, given meta-analyses addressing similar questions captured literature until this point. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions explored trends over time and the impacts of exposure category, occupation, economic context, volunteer status, sex, and PTSD measurement. Analyses included 138 studies (173 independent samples). General samples with routine exposures possessed greater prevalence (14.3 %) than samples exposed to large-scale disasters (8.3 %). For the first time, there was some evidence of increasing prevalence over time within routine exposure samples. Low/middle-income countries and non-volunteers exhibited greater PTSD prevalence than high-income countries and volunteers. Prevalence varied based on PTSD outcome measurement, although no differences emerged between occupational and sex subgroups. Increasing PTSD prevalence over time appears to have been largely driven by increases observed since the COVID-19 pandemic, yet important questions remain regarding why prevalence has not decreased in relation to increasing efforts to support this population's mental health. All first responder occupations appear equally prone to PTSD, and thus equally in need of intervention. Workers in low/middle-income countries are particularly vulnerable to PTSD, potentially due to more limited resourcing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 102622"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144665100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A systematic review on predictors of treatment outcome among forcibly displaced adults receiving psychological and/or psychosocial interventions 对接受心理和/或社会心理干预的被迫流离失所成年人治疗结果调节因子的系统回顾
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-06-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102619
Jennifer Kurath , Dharani Keyan , Aemal Akhtar , William Vilella Martins , Barbara Komenda , Victoria Maurer , Kadir Turgut , Richard A. Bryant , Naser Morina
Forcibly displaced people (FDP) have an elevated risk of mental disorders. Though existing interventions reduce psychological symptoms overall, many FDP do not respond, indicating a need to explore contributing factors. This systematic review examined predictors of treatment outcome among adult FDP receiving psychological and/or psychosocial interventions. Studies were included if they reported predictor analyses with positive or negative mental health outcomes. Records from five databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PTSDpubs, Cochrane, Embase) and citations and bibliographies of 78 reviews, as well as of all included articles were evaluated (last update: 13.09.24). Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane tools (RoB 2.0, ROBINS-I). Findings were synthesised using a narrative review, including a summary of effect estimates and an evaluation of evidence strength with an adapted version of the Best Evidence Synthesis Research Strategy (BESRS) framework for specialised and low-intensity interventions separately. Sixty-four studies (N = 9982, mean age = 38.0 years, 44.9 % females) reported 321 effects, of which 223 were summarised in 21 predictor categories. Most categories yielded insufficient evidence. For specialised interventions, pain, disability, lower level of education, unemployment, and longer time since arrival to the host country were associated with worse outcomes. For low-intensity interventions, a higher level of education and female gender were associated with better outcomes. Despite identifying key predictors, the high heterogeneity across studies and the large proportion of missing data warrant caution when interpreting results. Future research should ensure larger datasets and more complex models to detect consistent effects and shed light on the interplay between predictor variables. Clinicians should consider systematically assessing disability and pain at intake to provide additional support to the severely impaired.
被迫流离失所者(FDP)患精神障碍的风险较高。虽然现有的干预措施总体上减少了心理症状,但许多FDP没有反应,这表明需要探索促成因素。本系统综述检查了接受心理和/或社会心理干预的成年FDP治疗结果的调节因子。如果研究报告了具有积极或消极心理健康结果的调节分析,则纳入研究。评估了5个数据库(MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PTSDpubs, Cochrane, Embase)的记录和78篇综述的引文和参考书目,以及所有纳入的文章(最后更新:13.09.24)。使用Cochrane工具(rob2.0, ROBINS-I)评估偏倚风险。研究结果采用叙述性综述进行综合,包括对专门干预和低强度干预的效果估计的单独摘要。64项研究(N = 9982,平均年龄 = 38.0 岁,女性44.9 %)报告了321个调节效应,其中223个被总结为21个调节类别。大多数分类的证据不足。对于专门的干预措施,疼痛、残疾、低教育水平、失业和较长时间与较差的结果相关。对于低强度干预,较高的教育水平和女性性别与更好的结果相关。尽管确定了关键调节因子,但研究之间的高异质性和大量缺失数据需要在解释结果时谨慎。未来的研究应该确保更大的数据集和更复杂的模型来检测一致的调节效应,并阐明它们之间的相互作用。临床医生应该考虑系统地评估摄入时的残疾和疼痛,为严重受损的患者提供额外的支持。
{"title":"A systematic review on predictors of treatment outcome among forcibly displaced adults receiving psychological and/or psychosocial interventions","authors":"Jennifer Kurath ,&nbsp;Dharani Keyan ,&nbsp;Aemal Akhtar ,&nbsp;William Vilella Martins ,&nbsp;Barbara Komenda ,&nbsp;Victoria Maurer ,&nbsp;Kadir Turgut ,&nbsp;Richard A. Bryant ,&nbsp;Naser Morina","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102619","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102619","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forcibly displaced people (FDP) have an elevated risk of mental disorders. Though existing interventions reduce psychological symptoms overall, many FDP do not respond, indicating a need to explore contributing factors. This systematic review examined predictors of treatment outcome among adult FDP receiving psychological and/or psychosocial interventions. Studies were included if they reported predictor analyses with positive or negative mental health outcomes. Records from five databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PTSDpubs, Cochrane, Embase) and citations and bibliographies of 78 reviews, as well as of all included articles were evaluated (last update: 13.09.24). Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane tools (RoB 2.0, ROBINS-I). Findings were synthesised using a narrative review, including a summary of effect estimates and an evaluation of evidence strength with an adapted version of the Best Evidence Synthesis Research Strategy (BESRS) framework for specialised and low-intensity interventions separately. Sixty-four studies (<em>N</em> = 9982, mean age = 38.0 years, 44.9 % females) reported 321 effects, of which 223 were summarised in 21 predictor categories. Most categories yielded insufficient evidence. For specialised interventions, pain, disability, lower level of education, unemployment, and longer time since arrival to the host country were associated with worse outcomes. For low-intensity interventions, a higher level of education and female gender were associated with better outcomes. Despite identifying key predictors, the high heterogeneity across studies and the large proportion of missing data warrant caution when interpreting results. Future research should ensure larger datasets and more complex models to detect consistent effects and shed light on the interplay between predictor variables. Clinicians should consider systematically assessing disability and pain at intake to provide additional support to the severely impaired.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 102619"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144500754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating measures of LGBTQ+ intimate partner violence using consensus-based standards of validity 使用基于共识的有效性标准评估LGBQTIA+亲密伴侣暴力措施
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-06-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102620
Sinéad Kelleher, Cal De Nicolas Audoin, Lisa Callaghan, Áine Travers

Background

Evidence suggests that lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, plus (LGBTQ+) people experience intimate partner violence (IPV) at similar or higher rates to their heterosexual and cisgender counterparts. However, there are also indications that LGBTQ+ people may experience IPV in particular ways, which are not usually included in existing standardised measures of IPV.

Methods

A review of existing measures for capturing IPV in LGBTQ+ samples was conducted using the COnsensus-based Standards for selecting health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). Four databases (PubMed, PsychINFO via Ebsco, Cinahl Complete via Ebsco and Web of Science) were systematically searched, to identify all articles that used psychometric measures to capture IPV in the LGBTQ+ community.

Results

Forty-two articles describing twenty-two self-report measures were included. Few articles described a measure development process or assessed content validity. Although a significant proportion of measures were rated ‘very good’ for internal consistency, several received an ‘inadequate’ or ‘doubtful’ rating. All measures that had assessments of structural validity and measurement invariance were rated as ‘very good’. However, invariance testing was absent from most studies. The quality of hypothesis testing varied across studies and all but one carried out reliability analyses.

Conclusions

Due to a lack of high-quality psychometric assessment, more evidence for the validity, reliability, or responsiveness of IPV measures for LGBTQ+ samples is needed. Further psychometric testing is needed to improve the assessment of IPV across contexts and to strengthen the robustness of findings in this field of research.
有证据表明,女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、酷儿和同性恋者(LGBTQ+)经历亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的比例与异性恋和异性恋者相似或更高。然而,也有迹象表明LGBTQ+人群可能以特定的方式经历IPV,这些方式通常不包括在现有的IPV标准化测量中。
{"title":"Evaluating measures of LGBTQ+ intimate partner violence using consensus-based standards of validity","authors":"Sinéad Kelleher,&nbsp;Cal De Nicolas Audoin,&nbsp;Lisa Callaghan,&nbsp;Áine Travers","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102620","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102620","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Evidence suggests that lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, plus (LGBTQ+) people experience intimate partner violence (IPV) at similar or higher rates to their heterosexual and cisgender counterparts. However, there are also indications that LGBTQ+ people may experience IPV in particular ways, which are not usually included in existing standardised measures of IPV.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A review of existing measures for capturing IPV in LGBTQ+ samples was conducted using the COnsensus-based Standards for selecting health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). Four databases (PubMed, PsychINFO via Ebsco, Cinahl Complete via Ebsco and Web of Science) were systematically searched, to identify all articles that used psychometric measures to capture IPV in the LGBTQ+ community.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-two articles describing twenty-two self-report measures were included. Few articles described a measure development process or assessed content validity. Although a significant proportion of measures were rated ‘very good’ for internal consistency, several received an ‘inadequate’ or ‘doubtful’ rating. All measures that had assessments of structural validity and measurement invariance were rated as ‘very good’. However, invariance testing was absent from most studies. The quality of hypothesis testing varied across studies and all but one carried out reliability analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Due to a lack of high-quality psychometric assessment, more evidence for the validity, reliability, or responsiveness of IPV measures for LGBTQ+ samples is needed. Further psychometric testing is needed to improve the assessment of IPV across contexts and to strengthen the robustness of findings in this field of research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 102620"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144500733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Jumping to conclusions and delusional ideation: A systematic review and meta-analysis across the psychosis continuum 妄下结论和妄想症:横跨精神病连续体的系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-06-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102618
Rose Doherty , Nathan Weber , Charley Hillier , Robert Ross , Ryan Balzan
We applied a two-stage Bayesian analysis to examine the relationship between the jumping to conclusions (JTC) bias (measured on the beads, box, fishing, and/or survey tasks) and delusional ideation (measured on the Peters et al. Delusions Inventory or the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences). MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and five previous JTC reviews were searched for eligible studies published between 1988 and December 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using an adapted version of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality assessment tool. Forty-two studies (n = 7604) were identified as meeting inclusion criteria, with four subgroups: general population (n = 7538), psychosis with current delusions (n = 449), psychosis without current delusions (n = 29), and clinical control (n = 77). Our first analysis presented a meta-analysis of correlations between delusional ideation and JTC. Our second analysis presented a zero-inflated Poisson regression, assessing change in JTC across variable delusional ideation scores. Impact of data quality was assessed in both analyses. No meaningful relationships between JTC and delusional ideation were found in the full dataset or any subgroup, but the subgroup with current delusions showed a relatively greater JTC bias than the general population subgroup. Data-quality procedures did not impact results. Overall, results suggest that the JTC bias is not related to delusional ideation, or indexes of delusional ideation and/or JTC used in this meta-analysis are poor measures of these constructs. Our results did not assess delusional severity, thus interpretations in clinical populations are limited. PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42021266402.
我们应用了两阶段贝叶斯分析来检验跳跃到结论(JTC)偏差(在珠子、盒子、钓鱼和/或调查任务上测量)和妄想观念(在彼得斯等人上测量)之间的关系。妄想清单或精神体验的社区评估)。检索了MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Scopus、Web of Science和5篇JTC先前的综述,检索了1988年至2024年12月间发表的符合条件的研究。使用医疗保健研究和质量评估机构的改进版本评估偏倚风险。42研究(n = 7604)被确定为满足入选标准,与四子组:一般人群(n = 7538),精神病与当前错觉(n = 449),精神病没有当前妄想(n = 29),和临床控制(n = 77)。我们的第一个分析提出了妄想和JTC之间相关性的元分析。我们的第二个分析提出了零膨胀泊松回归,评估了不同妄想意念得分的JTC变化。两项分析均评估了数据质量的影响。在完整的数据集或任何亚组中都没有发现JTC与妄想之间有意义的关系,但患有当前妄想的亚组比一般人群亚组显示出相对更大的JTC偏差。数据质量程序不影响结果。总的来说,结果表明JTC偏倚与妄想意识无关,或者在本荟萃分析中使用的妄想意识和/或JTC指数是这些构念的不良衡量指标。我们的结果没有评估妄想的严重程度,因此在临床人群中的解释是有限的。普洛斯彼罗[被删除了]。
{"title":"Jumping to conclusions and delusional ideation: A systematic review and meta-analysis across the psychosis continuum","authors":"Rose Doherty ,&nbsp;Nathan Weber ,&nbsp;Charley Hillier ,&nbsp;Robert Ross ,&nbsp;Ryan Balzan","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102618","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102618","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We applied a two-stage Bayesian analysis to examine the relationship between the jumping to conclusions (JTC) bias (measured on the beads, box, fishing, and/or survey tasks) and delusional ideation (measured on the Peters et al. Delusions Inventory or the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences). MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and five previous JTC reviews were searched for eligible studies published between 1988 and December 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using an adapted version of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality assessment tool. Forty-two studies (<em>n</em> = 7604) were identified as meeting inclusion criteria, with four subgroups: general population (<em>n</em> = 7538), psychosis with current delusions (<em>n</em> = 449), psychosis without current delusions (<em>n</em> = 29), and clinical control (<em>n</em> = 77). Our first analysis presented a meta-analysis of correlations between delusional ideation and JTC. Our second analysis presented a zero-inflated Poisson regression, assessing change in JTC across variable delusional ideation scores. Impact of data quality was assessed in both analyses. No meaningful relationships between JTC and delusional ideation were found in the full dataset or any subgroup, but the subgroup with current delusions showed a relatively greater JTC bias than the general population subgroup. Data-quality procedures did not impact results. Overall, results suggest that the JTC bias is not related to delusional ideation, or indexes of delusional ideation and/or JTC used in this meta-analysis are poor measures of these constructs. Our results did not assess delusional severity, thus interpretations in clinical populations are limited. PROSPERO <span><span>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42021266402</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 102618"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144500757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond the office: The role of clinical outreach services in counselling with Indigenous youth and families 办事处之外:临床外展服务在向土著青年和家庭提供咨询方面的作用
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-06-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102615
Heba Elgharbawy , Carrie Bove
Stepping into a counselling office can be rife with barriers and inherent challenges, particularly for Indigenous communities who experience structural forms of marginalization or colonial violence or oppression. Outreach counselling, which is an alternative to traditional, often Eurocentric, office-based counselling services, can serve as a flexible, personal, cultural, and community-centered support. There is currently a scarcity of research that explores outreach counselling and its impacts on client engagement and wellness, specifically from Indigenous youth voices. This project involved a literature review of the available information on outreach counselling use with Indigenous communities across the globe. Through thematic analysis, four main themes were identified including 1) a lack of evidence on outreach service models and research evaluating its use with Indigenous communities and particularly with Indigenous youth, 2) evidence that suggests a strong call for more outreach counselling as it increases accessibility, 3) improved wellness through outreach models, and 4) considerations for practitioners when implementing outreach models in counselling. Actionable recommendations to enhance the accessibility and sustainability of outreach counselling services with Indigenous youth and families and ethical considerations are discussed. These findings offer communities and mental health professionals an overview of an alternative counselling model that can provide a more tailored approach to clinical care for Indigenous youth.
进入咨询办公室可能充满障碍和固有的挑战,特别是对经历结构性边缘化或殖民暴力或压迫的土著社区而言。外联咨询是传统的、通常以欧洲为中心的、以办公室为基础的咨询服务的替代方案,可以作为一种灵活的、个人的、文化的和以社区为中心的支持。目前很少有研究探讨外展咨询及其对客户参与和健康的影响,特别是来自土著青年的声音。该项目涉及对全球土著社区使用外联咨询的现有信息进行文献审查。通过专题分析,确定了四个主要主题,包括:1)缺乏外展服务模式的证据和评估其在土著社区,特别是土著青年中的使用情况的研究;2)有证据表明强烈呼吁更多的外展咨询,因为它增加了可及性;3)通过外展模式改善健康;4)在咨询中实施外展模式时对从业人员的考虑。讨论了提高土著青年和家庭外联咨询服务的可获得性和可持续性的可行建议以及道德考虑。这些发现为社区和心理健康专业人员提供了一种替代性咨询模式的概述,这种模式可以为土著青年提供更有针对性的临床护理方法。
{"title":"Beyond the office: The role of clinical outreach services in counselling with Indigenous youth and families","authors":"Heba Elgharbawy ,&nbsp;Carrie Bove","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102615","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102615","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Stepping into a counselling office can be rife with barriers and inherent challenges, particularly for Indigenous communities who experience structural forms of marginalization or colonial violence or oppression. Outreach counselling, which is an alternative to traditional, often Eurocentric, office-based counselling services, can serve as a flexible, personal, cultural, and community-centered support. There is currently a scarcity of research that explores outreach counselling and its impacts on client engagement and wellness, specifically from Indigenous youth voices. This project involved a literature review of the available information on outreach counselling use with Indigenous communities across the globe. Through thematic analysis, four main themes were identified including 1) a lack of evidence on outreach service models and research evaluating its use with Indigenous communities and particularly with Indigenous youth, 2) evidence that suggests a strong call for more outreach counselling as it increases accessibility, 3) improved wellness through outreach models, and 4) considerations for practitioners when implementing outreach models in counselling. Actionable recommendations to enhance the accessibility and sustainability of outreach counselling services with Indigenous youth and families and ethical considerations are discussed. These findings offer communities and mental health professionals an overview of an alternative counselling model that can provide a more tailored approach to clinical care for Indigenous youth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 102615"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144490440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Growing through adversity: A meta-analytic and conceptual elucidation of the relationship between posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic growth among youth 逆境成长:青少年创伤后应激与创伤后成长关系的元分析与概念阐释
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102617
Maria Jernslett , Ryan P. Kilmer , Demetris Avraam , Xenia Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous
Trauma may engender both posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and posttraumatic growth (PTG) among youth, but what is the nature of the relationship between these variables and what does it imply about youths' recovery trajectories? To explore this, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, ERIC, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global were searched, supplemented by reference trails, journal searches, and expert consultations, to identify quantitative studies on PTSS and PTG in youth (mean age ≤ 19 years). This resulted in 63 eligible articles. Both linear (n = 53) and curvilinear (n = 12) estimates were meta-analysed using random-effects models. Linear dependent estimates were pooled using weighted corrected averages and curvilinear dependent effects were clustered using robust variance estimation. The pooled linear estimate was r = 0.2028 [95 % CI 0.1348; 0.2689], p < .0001, based on 53 independent estimates and a total sample size of 33,774.6. The pooled curvilinear estimate was b = −0.199 (SE = 0.0573, p = .012). Moderator analyses further revealed a significant cultural influence, with Western youth (r = 0.3100 [95 % CI 0.1977; 0.4142], N = 6141) demonstrating a stronger association between PTSS and PTG compared to their Eastern counterparts (r = 0.0727 [95 % CI −0.0130; 0.1574], N = 21,778.42). The findings paint a nuanced and complex picture of posttrauma responses among youth, ultimately underscoring that, while PTSS and PTG can coexist, PTSS that are too excessive may not be conducive to PTG.
创伤可能在青少年中产生创伤后应激症状(PTSS)和创伤后成长(PTG),但这些变量之间的关系的本质是什么?它对青少年的恢复轨迹意味着什么?为此,我们检索了PubMed、PsycINFO、Scopus、ERIC和ProQuest dissertation and Theses Global,并辅以参考文献、期刊检索和专家咨询,以确定青少年(平均年龄 ≤ 19 岁)中PTSS和PTG的定量研究。这产生了63个符合条件的条目。使用随机效应模型对线性(n = 53)和曲线(n = 12)估计值进行meta分析。线性相关估计使用加权校正平均值进行汇总,曲线相关效应使用稳健方差估计进行聚类。合并线性估计r = 0.2028[95 % CI 0.1348;0.2689], p & lt; 。0001,基于53个独立估计,总样本量为33,774.6。合并曲线估计值为b = −0.199 (SE = 0.0573,p = 0.012)。调节因子分析进一步揭示了显著的文化影响,西方青年(r = 0.3100[95 % CI 0.1977;0.4142], N = 6141),表明PTSS和PTG之间的相关性强于东部地区(r = 0.0727[95 % CI−0.0130;0.1574), N = 21778点)。研究结果描绘了年轻人创伤后反应的微妙而复杂的图景,最终强调,虽然创伤后应激障碍和创伤后应激障碍可以共存,但过度的创伤后应激障碍可能不利于创伤后应激障碍。
{"title":"Growing through adversity: A meta-analytic and conceptual elucidation of the relationship between posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic growth among youth","authors":"Maria Jernslett ,&nbsp;Ryan P. Kilmer ,&nbsp;Demetris Avraam ,&nbsp;Xenia Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102617","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102617","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Trauma may engender both posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and posttraumatic growth (PTG) among youth, but what is the nature of the relationship between these variables and what does it imply about youths' recovery trajectories? To explore this, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, ERIC, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global were searched, supplemented by reference trails, journal searches, and expert consultations, to identify quantitative studies on PTSS and PTG in youth (mean age ≤ 19 years). This resulted in 63 eligible articles. Both linear (<em>n</em> = 53) and curvilinear (<em>n</em> = 12) estimates were meta-analysed using random-effects models. Linear dependent estimates were pooled using weighted corrected averages and curvilinear dependent effects were clustered using robust variance estimation. The pooled linear estimate was <em>r</em> = 0.2028 [95 % CI 0.1348; 0.2689], <em>p</em> &lt; .0001, based on 53 independent estimates and a total sample size of 33,774.6. The pooled curvilinear estimate was <em>b</em> = −0.199 (<em>SE</em> = 0.0573, <em>p</em> = .012). Moderator analyses further revealed a significant cultural influence, with Western youth (<em>r</em> = 0.3100 [95 % CI 0.1977; 0.4142], <em>N</em> = 6141) demonstrating a stronger association between PTSS and PTG compared to their Eastern counterparts (<em>r</em> = 0.0727 [95 % CI −0.0130; 0.1574], <em>N</em> = 21,778.42). The findings paint a nuanced and complex picture of posttrauma responses among youth, ultimately underscoring that, while PTSS and PTG can coexist, PTSS that are too excessive may not be conducive to PTG.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 102617"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144329490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The clinical inadequacy of the concept of treatment-resistant depression: Innovative strategies in assessment and psychotherapeutic management 难治性抑郁症概念的临床不足:评估和心理治疗管理的创新策略
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-06-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102616
Jenny Guidi , Giovanni A. Fava
Pharmacological strategies have been developed for patients with major depressive disorder who fail to respond to standard drug treatment. The current clinical approach primarily relies on counting episodes that fulfill specific criteria and regards non-pharmacological strategies as of marginal value, despite their recognized importance in treating depression. Most attention is devoted to treatment-resistant patients' characteristics rather than to the process related to therapeutic management. However, how the patient experiences the treatment process, his/her interaction with the physician/therapist and significant others, and the patient's role in treatment plan (self-management) are all essential therapeutic components. A broader evaluation of factors related to the patient (e.g., illness denial, psychological reactance, demoralization), the therapy (e.g., clinician's attitude, behavioral toxicity of antidepressants), the environment (e.g., allostatic load/overload and health-damaging behaviors), and morbidity (e.g., medical and psychiatric comorbidity) is warranted. Assessment based on clinimetric methods (i.e., staging, macro-analysis) and clinical judgment allow a differential diagnosis of phenomena such as non-response, pseudo-resistance, treatment resistance, loss of clinical effect during maintenance antidepressant treatment, failure to achieve remission after a psychotherapy trial, partially remitted depression (i.e., presence of residual symptoms). Choice of the psychotherapeutic approach for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), particularly cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy, should follow the indications derived from clinical assessment. Treatment of TRD can thus be conceptualized as an integrated therapeutic approach to different components encompassing symptoms, psychosocial factors, lifestyle and psychological well-being.
对于标准药物治疗无效的重性抑郁症患者,已经开发了药理学策略。目前的临床方法主要依赖于满足特定标准的发作次数,并将非药物策略视为边缘价值,尽管它们在治疗抑郁症方面具有公认的重要性。大多数注意力都集中在治疗抵抗患者的特征上,而不是与治疗管理相关的过程。然而,患者如何体验治疗过程,他/她与医生/治疗师和重要他人的互动,以及患者在治疗计划中的角色(自我管理)都是必不可少的治疗组成部分。有必要对与患者相关的因素进行更广泛的评估(例如,疾病否认、心理抗拒、士气低落)、治疗(例如,临床医生的态度、抗抑郁药的行为毒性)、环境(例如,适应负荷/过载和损害健康的行为)和发病率(例如,医疗和精神合并症)。基于临床计量方法(即分期、宏观分析)和临床判断的评估可以对诸如无反应、伪耐药、治疗耐药、维持抗抑郁药物治疗期间临床效果丧失、心理治疗试验后未能达到缓解、部分缓解的抑郁症(即存在残留症状)等现象进行鉴别诊断。难治性抑郁症(TRD)的心理治疗方法的选择,特别是认知行为治疗、正念认知治疗和人际心理治疗,应遵循临床评估得出的适应症。因此,对TRD的治疗可以概念化为对包括症状、社会心理因素、生活方式和心理健康在内的不同组成部分采取综合治疗方法。
{"title":"The clinical inadequacy of the concept of treatment-resistant depression: Innovative strategies in assessment and psychotherapeutic management","authors":"Jenny Guidi ,&nbsp;Giovanni A. Fava","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102616","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102616","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pharmacological strategies have been developed for patients with major depressive disorder who fail to respond to standard drug treatment. The current clinical approach primarily relies on counting episodes that fulfill specific criteria and regards non-pharmacological strategies as of marginal value, despite their recognized importance in treating depression. Most attention is devoted to treatment-resistant patients' characteristics rather than to the process related to therapeutic management. However, how the patient experiences the treatment process, his/her interaction with the physician/therapist and significant others, and the patient's role in treatment plan (self-management) are all essential therapeutic components. A broader evaluation of factors related to the patient (e.g., illness denial, psychological reactance, demoralization), the therapy (e.g., clinician's attitude, behavioral toxicity of antidepressants), the environment (e.g., allostatic load/overload and health-damaging behaviors), and morbidity (e.g., medical and psychiatric comorbidity) is warranted. Assessment based on clinimetric methods (i.e., staging, macro-analysis) and clinical judgment allow a differential diagnosis of phenomena such as non-response, pseudo-resistance, treatment resistance, loss of clinical effect during maintenance antidepressant treatment, failure to achieve remission after a psychotherapy trial, partially remitted depression (i.e., presence of residual symptoms). Choice of the psychotherapeutic approach for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), particularly cognitive-behavioral therapy, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy, should follow the indications derived from clinical assessment. Treatment of TRD can thus be conceptualized as an integrated therapeutic approach to different components encompassing symptoms, psychosocial factors, lifestyle and psychological well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 102616"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144329492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A scoping review of psychosocial suicide prevention interventions among adults: Clinical trial factors, predictors, mediators, and moderators in randomized controlled trials 成人心理社会自杀预防干预的范围综述:随机对照试验中的临床试验因素、预测因子、中介因子和调节因子
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-06-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102614
Jaclyn C. Kearns , Craig P. Polizzi , Julia Naganuma-Carreras , Kyle J. Bourassa , Tate F. Halverson , Rokas Perskaudas , Nathan A. Kimbrel , Alejandro Interian , Robert M. Bossarte , Bryann B. DeBeer , Joseph I. Constans , Melissa E. Dichter , Steven K. Dobscha , Marianne Goodman , Mark Ilgen , Richard R. Owen , Brian P. Marx

Objective

There has been a proliferation of psychosocial interventions to prevent suicide over the past several decades with varying levels of benefit. We conducted a comprehensive scoping review to synthesize our knowledge of the effectiveness, strengths, and limitations of these interventions among adults. We focused on important aspects of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including internal and external validity, outcome measurement, and exclusion criteria. We examined predictors, mediators, and moderators associated with suicide outcomes.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted for RCTs of psychosocial suicide prevention interventions with adults, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines.

Results

We identified 141 publications and 131 were unique RCTs. Publications had some concerns with risk of bias (internal validity); publications had moderate or high external validity. A quarter of RCTs excluded older adults (60 years or older) and individuals with psychotic symptoms/features and bipolar disorder/symptoms despite the fact that these groups are at elevated risk for suicide death. Forty-one publications (29.1 % of total publications) examined predictors, mediators, and moderators of suicide outcomes. Sixteen (11.3 % of total publications) publications included predictors, two (1.4 %) included mediators, 11 (7.8 %) included posttreatment mediators, and 16 (11.3 %) included moderators. Participant gender/sex, marital status, and race did not moderate treatment effects. Mixed results may be due to insufficient statistical power to test predictor, mediator, and moderator hypotheses.

Conclusion

This review highlighted RCT aspects (e.g., exclusion of older adults and individuals with serious mental illness, improving suicide outcome measurement) that may be beneficial to consider in future RCTs. Additional research on predictors, mediators, and moderators is needed.
在过去的几十年里,预防自杀的心理社会干预措施激增,并取得了不同程度的效果。我们进行了一项全面的范围综述,以综合我们对这些干预措施在成人中的有效性、优势和局限性的了解。我们关注随机对照试验(RCTs)的重要方面,包括内部和外部效度、结果测量和排除标准。我们检查了与自杀结果相关的预测因子、调节因子和调节因子。
{"title":"A scoping review of psychosocial suicide prevention interventions among adults: Clinical trial factors, predictors, mediators, and moderators in randomized controlled trials","authors":"Jaclyn C. Kearns ,&nbsp;Craig P. Polizzi ,&nbsp;Julia Naganuma-Carreras ,&nbsp;Kyle J. Bourassa ,&nbsp;Tate F. Halverson ,&nbsp;Rokas Perskaudas ,&nbsp;Nathan A. Kimbrel ,&nbsp;Alejandro Interian ,&nbsp;Robert M. Bossarte ,&nbsp;Bryann B. DeBeer ,&nbsp;Joseph I. Constans ,&nbsp;Melissa E. Dichter ,&nbsp;Steven K. Dobscha ,&nbsp;Marianne Goodman ,&nbsp;Mark Ilgen ,&nbsp;Richard R. Owen ,&nbsp;Brian P. Marx","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102614","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102614","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>There has been a proliferation of psychosocial interventions to prevent suicide over the past several decades with varying levels of benefit. We conducted a comprehensive scoping review to synthesize our knowledge of the effectiveness, strengths, and limitations of these interventions among adults. We focused on important aspects of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including internal and external validity, outcome measurement, and exclusion criteria. We examined predictors, mediators, and moderators associated with suicide outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted for RCTs of psychosocial suicide prevention interventions with adults, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 141 publications and 131 were unique RCTs. Publications had some concerns with risk of bias (internal validity); publications had moderate or high external validity. A quarter of RCTs excluded older adults (60 years or older) and individuals with psychotic symptoms/features and bipolar disorder/symptoms despite the fact that these groups are at elevated risk for suicide death. Forty-one publications (29.1 % of total publications) examined predictors, mediators, and moderators of suicide outcomes. Sixteen (11.3 % of total publications) publications included predictors, two (1.4 %) included mediators, 11 (7.8 %) included posttreatment mediators, and 16 (11.3 %) included moderators. Participant gender/sex, marital status, and race did not moderate treatment effects. Mixed results may be due to insufficient statistical power to test predictor, mediator, and moderator hypotheses.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review highlighted RCT aspects (e.g., exclusion of older adults and individuals with serious mental illness, improving suicide outcome measurement) that may be beneficial to consider in future RCTs. Additional research on predictors, mediators, and moderators is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 102614"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144279048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Better together: The importance of brain health in the relationship between stress regulation, social connection and lifestyle in promoting mental health and well-being 更好地在一起:大脑健康在压力调节、社会联系和生活方式之间的关系中的重要性,以促进心理健康和福祉
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-06-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102611
Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt, Riet Vergauwe, Chris Baeken, Matias M. Pulopulos, Rudi De Raedt
Regulating stress effectively has a profound impact on our well-being and is known to be significantly interrelated to our social connections, as well as healthy lifestyle behaviors. However, the complex mechanisms through which these components are associated with maintaining well-being remain enigmatic.
We propose a theoretical interrelated framework for which the maintenance of brain health assumes a central role. This involves the adaptive functionality of neural circuits associated with regulating emotions, self-control, and the ability to derive pleasure from rewards or enjoyable experiences. As a result, based on brain health as a central condition, we explore how different dimensions of social connections directly impact stress regulation, or indirectly through brain health. Furthermore, we delve into how lifestyle choices indirectly affect stress regulation, mediated by their impact on brain health. Reciprocally, our lifestyle choices are wired by our social connections, reinforcing the significant role of brain health.
In the context of this conceptual framework, it is emphasized that psychotherapeutic interventions need to expand beyond the sole concentration on psychological processes. It is imperative to focus on interconnected biopsychosocial components known to positively enhance brain health, and hence to enhance the capacity of psychotherapy to significantly amplify mental health and well-being.
有效地调节压力对我们的幸福有着深远的影响,并且与我们的社会关系以及健康的生活方式行为有着重要的关联。然而,这些成分与维持健康相关的复杂机制仍然是个谜。我们提出了一个相互关联的理论框架,其中大脑健康的维护承担了核心作用。这涉及到与调节情绪、自我控制以及从奖励或愉快经历中获得快乐的能力相关的神经回路的适应性功能。因此,基于大脑健康作为中心条件,我们探索社会关系的不同维度如何直接影响压力调节,或间接影响大脑健康。此外,我们深入研究了生活方式的选择如何间接影响压力调节,通过它们对大脑健康的影响来调节。反过来,我们选择的生活方式也与我们的社会关系密切相关,从而强化了大脑健康的重要作用。在这个概念框架的背景下,强调心理治疗干预需要扩展到超越心理过程的唯一集中。必须把重点放在相互关联的生物心理社会因素上,这些因素已知能积极促进大脑健康,从而提高心理治疗的能力,显著增强心理健康和福祉。
{"title":"Better together: The importance of brain health in the relationship between stress regulation, social connection and lifestyle in promoting mental health and well-being","authors":"Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt,&nbsp;Riet Vergauwe,&nbsp;Chris Baeken,&nbsp;Matias M. Pulopulos,&nbsp;Rudi De Raedt","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102611","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102611","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Regulating stress effectively has a profound impact on our well-being and is known to be significantly interrelated to our social connections, as well as healthy lifestyle behaviors. However, the complex mechanisms through which these components are associated with maintaining well-being remain enigmatic.</div><div>We propose a theoretical interrelated framework for which the maintenance of brain health assumes a central role. This involves the adaptive functionality of neural circuits associated with regulating emotions, self-control, and the ability to derive pleasure from rewards or enjoyable experiences. As a result, based on brain health as a central condition, we explore how different dimensions of social connections directly impact stress regulation, or indirectly through brain health. Furthermore, we delve into how lifestyle choices indirectly affect stress regulation, mediated by their impact on brain health. Reciprocally, our lifestyle choices are wired by our social connections, reinforcing the significant role of brain health.</div><div>In the context of this conceptual framework, it is emphasized that psychotherapeutic interventions need to expand beyond the sole concentration on psychological processes. It is imperative to focus on interconnected biopsychosocial components known to positively enhance brain health, and hence to enhance the capacity of psychotherapy to significantly amplify mental health and well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 102611"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144272449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative effects of different physical exercises on cognitive function and intervention adherence in older adults with cognitive impairment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis 不同体育锻炼对老年认知障碍患者认知功能和干预依从性的影响:系统综述和网络荟萃分析
IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Pub Date : 2025-05-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102604
Geng Li , Gesi Teng , Weikun Zhang , Tao Song , Yafen Li , Ziqin Wang , Antao Chen

Background

Physical exercise is increasingly recognized as a beneficial nonpharmacological intervention for cognitive impairment in older adults; however, comparative evidence regarding the optimal exercise type and its sustainability remains unclear. This study aimed to compare and rank different exercise modalities based on their effects on cognition and intervention adherence among older adults (≥60 years) with cognitive impairment.

Methods

This systematic review, preregistered in PROSPERO (CRD42024497896), systematically searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, PubMed, and SPORTDiscus databases through February 1, 2024, with an updated search on March 16, 2025, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two reviewers independently screened and evaluated eligible studies assessing the effects of physical exercise interventions on global cognition and adherence among older adults aged ≥60 years with cognitive impairment. Secondary outcomes included follow-up global cognition, cognitive subdomains, activities of daily living (ADL), physical function, and neuropsychiatric symptoms. A network meta-analysis using a frequentist framework was conducted. Interventions were ranked according to the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA), and a two-dimensional cluster ranking plot was used to identify the optimal intervention balancing cognitive improvement and adherence.

Results

Our network meta-analysis evaluated 128 qualified RCTs involving 12,403 older adults (≥60 years) with cognitive impairment. Mind-body exercise emerged as the most effective intervention, demonstrating the greatest improvements in global cognition (SUCRA = 95.9 %; SMD = 0.91; 95 % CI: 0.65–1.16) and significantly higher adherence (SUCRA = 93.6 %; OR = 1.31; 95 % CI: 1.02–1.68) compared to controls. Aerobic, resistance, and multicomponent exercises also improved cognition significantly, but adherence was comparatively lower. Mind-body exercise additionally showed consistent benefits across cognitive subdomains, functional outcomes and follow-up global cognition.

Conclusions

All physical exercise modalities significantly improved cognition, yet mind-body exercise was identified as the optimal intervention, exhibiting superior cognitive effects, adherence, and related functional benefits. These findings can guide clinicians in developing evidence-based exercise prescriptions tailored specifically to older adults with cognitive impairment.
体育锻炼越来越被认为是老年人认知障碍的一种有益的非药物干预手段;然而,关于最佳运动类型及其可持续性的比较证据仍不清楚。本研究旨在比较不同运动方式对认知障碍老年人(≥60岁)认知和干预依从性的影响并进行排名。方法本系统综述在PROSPERO预注册(CRD42024497896),于2024年2月1日系统检索MEDLINE、Web of Science、Scopus、PsycINFO、PubMed和SPORTDiscus数据库,并于2025年3月16日更新检索,以确定随机对照试验(RCTs)。两名评论者独立筛选和评估了符合条件的研究,评估了体育锻炼干预对60岁以上认知障碍老年人整体认知和依从性的影响。次要结局包括随访的整体认知、认知子域、日常生活活动(ADL)、身体功能和神经精神症状。使用频率学框架进行网络元分析。根据累积排名曲线(SUCRA)对干预措施进行排名,并采用二维聚类排名图来确定平衡认知改善和依从性的最优干预措施。我们的网络荟萃分析评估了128项合格的随机对照试验,涉及12,403名认知障碍老年人(≥60岁)。身心锻炼是最有效的干预措施,在全球认知方面表现出最大的改善(supra = 95.9%;smd = 0.91;95% CI: 0.65-1.16)和更高的依从性(SUCRA = 93.6%;or = 1.31;95% CI: 1.02-1.68)。有氧运动、阻力运动和多组分运动也能显著改善认知,但依从性相对较低。此外,身心锻炼在认知子领域、功能结果和后续的整体认知方面显示出一致的益处。结论所有的体育锻炼方式都能显著改善认知,身心运动被认为是最佳的干预方式,表现出更好的认知效果、依从性和相关的功能益处。这些发现可以指导临床医生开发专门针对有认知障碍的老年人的循证运动处方。
{"title":"Comparative effects of different physical exercises on cognitive function and intervention adherence in older adults with cognitive impairment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Geng Li ,&nbsp;Gesi Teng ,&nbsp;Weikun Zhang ,&nbsp;Tao Song ,&nbsp;Yafen Li ,&nbsp;Ziqin Wang ,&nbsp;Antao Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102604","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102604","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Physical exercise is increasingly recognized as a beneficial nonpharmacological intervention for cognitive impairment in older adults; however, comparative evidence regarding the optimal exercise type and its sustainability remains unclear. This study aimed to compare and rank different exercise modalities based on their effects on cognition and intervention adherence among older adults (≥60 years) with cognitive impairment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This systematic review, preregistered in PROSPERO (CRD42024497896), systematically searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, PubMed, and SPORTDiscus databases through February 1, 2024, with an updated search on March 16, 2025, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two reviewers independently screened and evaluated eligible studies assessing the effects of physical exercise interventions on global cognition and adherence among older adults aged ≥60 years with cognitive impairment. Secondary outcomes included follow-up global cognition, cognitive subdomains, activities of daily living (ADL), physical function, and neuropsychiatric symptoms. A network meta-analysis using a frequentist framework was conducted. Interventions were ranked according to the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA), and a two-dimensional cluster ranking plot was used to identify the optimal intervention balancing cognitive improvement and adherence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our network meta-analysis evaluated 128 qualified RCTs involving 12,403 older adults (≥60 years) with cognitive impairment. Mind-body exercise emerged as the most effective intervention, demonstrating the greatest improvements in global cognition (SUCRA = 95.9 %; SMD = 0.91; 95 % CI: 0.65–1.16) and significantly higher adherence (SUCRA = 93.6 %; OR = 1.31; 95 % CI: 1.02–1.68) compared to controls. Aerobic, resistance, and multicomponent exercises also improved cognition significantly, but adherence was comparatively lower. Mind-body exercise additionally showed consistent benefits across cognitive subdomains, functional outcomes and follow-up global cognition.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>All physical exercise modalities significantly improved cognition, yet mind-body exercise was identified as the optimal intervention, exhibiting superior cognitive effects, adherence, and related functional benefits. These findings can guide clinicians in developing evidence-based exercise prescriptions tailored specifically to older adults with cognitive impairment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 102604"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144203479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1