首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Psychology Review最新文献

英文 中文
Measurement tools for behaviours that challenge and behavioural function in people with intellectual disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and test-retest reliability 智障人士挑战行为和行为功能的测量工具:对内部一致性、评分者间可靠性和测试-再测可靠性的系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 12.8 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102434
Lauren Shelley , Chris Jones , Effie Pearson , Caroline Richards , Hayley Crawford , Arianna Paricos , Courtney Greenhill , Alixandra Woodhead , Joanne Tarver , Jane Waite

Behaviours that challenge (BtC) are common in people with intellectual disability (ID) and associated with negative long-term outcomes. Reliable characterisation of BtC and behavioural function is integral to person-centred interventions. This systematic review and meta-analytic study quantitatively synthesised the evidence-base for the internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and test-retest reliability of measures of BtC and behavioural function in people with ID (PROSPERO: CRD42021239042). Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO and MEDLINE were searched from inception to March 2024. Retrieved records (n = 3691) were screened independently to identify studies assessing eligible measurement properties in people with ID. Data extracted from 83 studies, across 29 measures, were synthesised in a series of random-effects meta-analyses. Subgroup analyses assessed the influence of methodological quality and study-level characteristics on pooled estimates. COSMIN criteria were used to evaluate the measurement properties of each measure. Pooled estimates ranged across measures: internal consistency (0.41–0.97), inter-rater reliability (0.29–0.93) and test-retest reliability (0.52–0.98). The quantity and quality of evidence varied substantially across measures; evidence was frequently unavailable or limited to a single study. Based on current evidence, candidate measures with the most evidence for internal consistency and reliability are discussed; however, continued assessment of measurement properties in ID populations is a key priority.

挑战行为(BtC)在智障人士(ID)中很常见,并与长期的不良后果相关。可靠地描述 BtC 和行为功能是以人为本的干预措施不可或缺的一部分。本系统综述和荟萃分析研究对智障人士 BtC 和行为功能测量的内部一致性、评分者间可靠性和测试-再测可靠性的证据基础进行了定量综合(PROSPERO:CRD42021239042)。检索了从开始到 2024 年 3 月的 Web of Science、Embase、PsycINFO 和 MEDLINE。对检索到的记录(n = 3691)进行了独立筛选,以确定对智障人士进行符合条件的测量属性评估的研究。对从 83 项研究中提取的 29 种测量数据进行了一系列随机效应荟萃分析。分组分析评估了方法学质量和研究水平特征对汇总估计值的影响。COSMIN 标准用于评估每种测量方法的测量属性。各测量指标的汇总估计值不尽相同:内部一致性(0.41-0.97)、评分者间可靠性(0.29-0.93)和测试-再测可靠性(0.52-0.98)。不同测量方法的证据数量和质量差别很大;证据往往不可用或仅限于一项研究。根据目前的证据,本文讨论了内部一致性和可靠性证据最多的候选测量指标;然而,继续评估智障人群的测量特性是当务之急。
{"title":"Measurement tools for behaviours that challenge and behavioural function in people with intellectual disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and test-retest reliability","authors":"Lauren Shelley ,&nbsp;Chris Jones ,&nbsp;Effie Pearson ,&nbsp;Caroline Richards ,&nbsp;Hayley Crawford ,&nbsp;Arianna Paricos ,&nbsp;Courtney Greenhill ,&nbsp;Alixandra Woodhead ,&nbsp;Joanne Tarver ,&nbsp;Jane Waite","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102434","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102434","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Behaviours that challenge (BtC) are common in people with intellectual disability (ID) and associated with negative long-term outcomes. Reliable characterisation of BtC and behavioural function is integral to person-centred interventions. This systematic review and meta-analytic study quantitatively synthesised the evidence-base for the internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and test-retest reliability of measures of BtC and behavioural function in people with ID (PROSPERO: CRD42021239042). Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO and MEDLINE were searched from inception to March 2024. Retrieved records (<em>n</em> = 3691) were screened independently to identify studies assessing eligible measurement properties in people with ID. Data extracted from 83 studies, across 29 measures, were synthesised in a series of random-effects meta-analyses. Subgroup analyses assessed the influence of methodological quality and study-level characteristics on pooled estimates. COSMIN criteria were used to evaluate the measurement properties of each measure. Pooled estimates ranged across measures: internal consistency (0.41–0.97), inter-rater reliability (0.29–0.93) and test-retest reliability (0.52–0.98). The quantity and quality of evidence varied substantially across measures; evidence was frequently unavailable or limited to a single study. Based on current evidence, candidate measures with the most evidence for internal consistency and reliability are discussed; however, continued assessment of measurement properties in ID populations is a key priority.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824000552/pdfft?md5=a913aeee5d92ff07a7f7b0ebf2955a34&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824000552-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140758843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The association between quality of therapeutic alliance and treatment outcomes in teletherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis 远程治疗中治疗联盟的质量与治疗效果之间的关系:系统回顾与荟萃分析
IF 12.8 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102430
Katie Aafjes-van Doorn , Daniel S. Spina , Sarah J. Horne , Vera Békés

Objective

The strength of the therapeutic alliance is widely understood to impact treatment outcomes, however, the alliance-outcome relationship in teletherapy has remained relatively unexamined. The aim of this meta-analysis is to systematically summarize the relationship between therapeutic alliance and treatment outcomes in teletherapy with adult patients conducted via videoconferencing or telephone.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of the databases PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, ProQuest Dissertation Databases, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and PubMed for studies published before June 26, 2023. We identified 31 studies with 34 independent samples (4862 participants).

Results

The average weighted effect size was 0.15, p = .001, 95% CI [0.07, 0.24], k = 34.

reflecting a small effect of therapeutic alliance on mental health outcomes. There was significant heterogeneity in the effect sizes, which was driven by between-study differences in the alliance-outcome correlation. The alliance-outcome effect was larger when the alliance was measured late in treatment and when the outcome was measured from the patient's perspective.

Conclusion

Very few teletherapy treatment studies were identified that initially reported on alliance-outcome associations, underlining that this is an under-researched area. The association between alliance-teletherapy outcomes in this meta-analysis was small but significant, and somewhat weaker than the alliance-outcome associations reported for in-person treatments and other online interventions. This might indicate that there are other processes at play in teletherapy that explain variance of treatment outcomes, or that the therapist (and the relationship) has less influence on the treatment outcomes than in in-person therapy.

目的人们普遍认为治疗联盟的强度会影响治疗效果,然而,人们对远程治疗中治疗联盟与治疗效果之间的关系却相对缺乏研究。本荟萃分析旨在系统总结通过视频会议或电话对成年患者进行远程治疗时治疗联盟与治疗结果之间的关系。方法我们对 PsycINFO、PsycARTICLES、ProQuest Dissertation Databases、EMBASE、The Cochrane Library、MEDLINE、Google Scholar 和 PubMed 等数据库中 2023 年 6 月 26 日之前发表的研究进行了系统检索。结果平均加权效应大小为 0.15,p = .001,95% CI [0.07,0.24],k = 34.反映出治疗联盟对心理健康结果的影响较小。效应大小存在明显的异质性,这主要是由于不同研究之间在联盟-结果相关性方面存在差异。当联盟在治疗后期进行测量,且结果从患者的角度进行测量时,联盟-结果效应更大。在这项荟萃分析中,联盟与远程治疗结果之间的关联虽然很小,但却很显著,而且与所报告的面对面治疗和其他在线干预的联盟与结果之间的关联相比要弱一些。这可能表明,远程治疗中还有其他过程可以解释治疗结果的差异,或者治疗师(和治疗关系)对治疗结果的影响小于面对面治疗。
{"title":"The association between quality of therapeutic alliance and treatment outcomes in teletherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Katie Aafjes-van Doorn ,&nbsp;Daniel S. Spina ,&nbsp;Sarah J. Horne ,&nbsp;Vera Békés","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102430","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102430","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The strength of the therapeutic alliance is widely understood to impact treatment outcomes, however, the alliance-outcome relationship in teletherapy has remained relatively unexamined. The aim of this meta-analysis is to systematically summarize the relationship between therapeutic alliance and treatment outcomes in teletherapy with adult patients conducted via videoconferencing or telephone.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a systematic search of the databases PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, ProQuest Dissertation Databases, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and PubMed for studies published before June 26, 2023. We identified 31 studies with 34 independent samples (4862 participants).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average weighted effect size was 0.15, <em>p</em> = .001, 95% CI [0.07, 0.24], <em>k</em> = 34.</p><p>reflecting a small effect of therapeutic alliance on mental health outcomes. There was significant heterogeneity in the effect sizes, which was driven by between-study diffe<u>r</u>ences in the alliance-outcome correlation. The alliance-outcome effect was larger when the alliance was measured late in treatment and when the outcome was measured from the patient's perspective.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Very few teletherapy treatment studies were identified that initially reported on alliance-outcome associations, underlining that this is an under-researched area. The association between alliance-teletherapy outcomes in this meta-analysis was small but significant, and somewhat weaker than the alliance-outcome associations reported for in-person treatments and other online interventions. This might indicate that there are other processes at play in teletherapy that explain variance of treatment outcomes, or that the therapist (and the relationship) has less influence on the treatment outcomes than in in-person therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140605271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Basic processes and clinical applications of mental imagery in worry: A systematic review 忧虑心理想象的基本过程和临床应用:系统综述
IF 12.8 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102427
Lauren Stavropoulos , David D.J. Cooper , Sophie M. Champion , Luke Keevers , Jill M. Newby , Jessica R. Grisham

Background

In this systematic review, we aimed to synthesise existing research on the phenomenology of mental imagery among high worriers compared to healthy individuals, and to characterise the nature and effectiveness of existing imagery-related interventions in treatment of worry.

Methods

PsycInfo, CENTRAL, EMBASE, Medline, Medline Epub, and PubMed were searched for studies examining the relationship between worry/GAD and mental imagery, or interventions using imagery in treatment of worry/GAD. We assessed study quality and used qualitative narrative synthesis to comprehensively map study results.

Results

The search yielded 2589 abstracts that were assessed for eligibility independently by two authors. From this, 183 full texts were screened and 50 qualitatively synthesised. Twenty-seven reported an association between worry/GAD and an aspect of mental imagery. Here, overactive negative and worry imagery, and diminished positive future imagining, were associated with worry/GAD. Twenty-three studies reported an intervention. This literature suggested mixed findings regarding efficacy, including for imaginal exposure as an independent technique for GAD.

Conclusions

Findings support dysfunctional negative imagining and diminished positive prospective imagery in GAD. General imagining abilities remain intact, which is promising for efforts to utilise imagery in treatment. Further research is warranted to develop innovative clinical applications of imagery in treatment of GAD.

背景在这篇系统性综述中,我们旨在综合现有的关于高度焦虑者与健康人相比的心理意象现象学的研究,并描述现有的与意象相关的干预措施在治疗焦虑方面的性质和有效性。方法我们检索了PsycInfo、CENTRAL、EMBASE、Medline、Medline Epub和PubMed上关于焦虑/GAD与心理意象之间关系的研究,或使用意象治疗焦虑/GAD的干预措施。我们对研究质量进行了评估,并使用定性叙事综合法对研究结果进行了全面描绘。结果检索共获得 2589 篇摘要,由两位作者对这些摘要的资格进行了独立评估。从中筛选出 183 篇全文,并对其中 50 篇进行了定性综合。其中 27 篇报告了担忧/GAD 与心理想象的某个方面之间的联系。其中,过度活跃的消极和忧虑想象以及减少的积极未来想象与担忧/焦虑症有关。23 项研究报告了干预措施。结论研究结果表明,在 GAD 中,消极想象功能失调,积极的未来想象减少。一般想象能力保持完好,这对利用想象进行治疗很有帮助。我们有必要开展进一步的研究,以开发意象治疗 GAD 的创新性临床应用。
{"title":"Basic processes and clinical applications of mental imagery in worry: A systematic review","authors":"Lauren Stavropoulos ,&nbsp;David D.J. Cooper ,&nbsp;Sophie M. Champion ,&nbsp;Luke Keevers ,&nbsp;Jill M. Newby ,&nbsp;Jessica R. Grisham","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102427","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102427","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In this systematic review, we aimed to synthesise existing research on the phenomenology of mental imagery among high worriers compared to healthy individuals, and to characterise the nature and effectiveness of existing imagery-related interventions in treatment of worry.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>PsycInfo, CENTRAL, EMBASE, Medline, Medline Epub, and PubMed were searched for studies examining the relationship between worry/GAD and mental imagery, or interventions using imagery in treatment of worry/GAD. We assessed study quality and used qualitative narrative synthesis to comprehensively map study results.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The search yielded 2589 abstracts that were assessed for eligibility independently by two authors. From this, 183 full texts were screened and 50 qualitatively synthesised. Twenty-seven reported an association between worry/GAD and an aspect of mental imagery. Here, overactive negative and worry imagery, and diminished positive future imagining, were associated with worry/GAD. Twenty-three studies reported an intervention. This literature suggested mixed findings regarding efficacy, including for imaginal exposure as an independent technique for GAD.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Findings support dysfunctional negative imagining and diminished positive prospective imagery in GAD. General imagining abilities remain intact, which is promising for efforts to utilise imagery in treatment. Further research is warranted to develop innovative clinical applications of imagery in treatment of GAD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824000485/pdfft?md5=40242e025e94457dc3c0b63d2123e60a&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824000485-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140605270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examining domains of psychological flexibility and inflexibility as treatment mechanisms in acceptance and commitment therapy: A comprehensive systematic and meta-analytic review 将心理灵活性和不灵活性领域作为接受和承诺疗法的治疗机制进行研究:全面系统和元分析综述
IF 12.8 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102432
Jenna A. Macri, Ronald D. Rogge

The current systematic and meta-analytic review sought to integrate a growing number of studies examining dimensions of psychological flexibility as treatment mechanisms for Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). Analyses of 77 records (67 unique studies; Ntotal = 9123 participants) from comprehensive searches of multiple databases suggested that ACT interventions led to reduced inflexibility (i.e., lowered global inflexibility, lack of present moment awareness, cognitive fusion, experiential avoidance, self-as-content, & inaction) and increased flexibility (i.e., committed action/contact with values, global flexibility/acceptance, & defusion). Those changes remained significant when ACT was compared with waitlist or active treatments and were significantly linked to corresponding drops in psychological distress, supporting their roles as ACT treatment mechanisms. Moderation analyses revealed that the use of student samples, exclusion of clinically symptomatic individuals, and comparisons of ACT with other active treatments weakened these effects whereas offering ACT as an individual therapy and excluding individuals in extreme crisis (i.e., with suicidal ideation) strengthened them. The meta-analytic findings and systematic review suggested specific recommendations for future clinical work and research on ACT mechanisms: (1) Evaluate both psychological flexibility and inflexibility as distinct treatment mechanisms, (2) Evaluate specific dimensions of psychological flexibility/inflexibility as mechanisms with multidimensional scales (CompACT, MPFI), (3) Broaden treatment outcomes to include forms of wellbeing (peace of mind, vitality, connectedness), (4) Assess mechanisms and outcomes repeatedly throughout treatment to model the process of therapeutic change, (5) Investigate non-specific factors (therapeutic alliance, treatment adherence) as mechanisms, and (6) Explore treatment mechanisms in effectiveness studies.

当前的系统性和荟萃分析综述试图整合越来越多的研究,这些研究将心理灵活性的各个层面作为接受与承诺疗法(ACT)的治疗机制。通过对多个数据库中的 77 项记录(67 项独特的研究;总人数 = 9123 名参与者)进行全面搜索,分析结果表明,接纳与承诺疗法干预可降低不灵活度(即降低整体不灵活度、缺乏当下意识、认知融合、经验回避、自我满足以及不作为),提高灵活性(即承诺行动/与价值观接触、整体灵活性/接纳以及化解)。在将 ACT 与等待治疗或积极治疗进行比较时,这些变化仍然很明显,并且与心理困扰的相应下降有明显联系,这支持了它们作为 ACT 治疗机制的作用。调节分析表明,使用学生样本、排除有临床症状的个体以及将 ACT 与其他积极疗法进行比较会削弱这些效果,而将 ACT 作为个体疗法并排除处于极端危机中的个体(即有自杀意念的个体)则会加强这些效果。荟萃分析结果和系统综述为今后的临床工作和 ACT 机制研究提出了具体建议:(1)将心理灵活性和非灵活性作为不同的治疗机制进行评估;(2)使用多维量表(CompACT、MPFI)将心理灵活性/非灵活性的特定维度作为机制进行评估;(3)扩大治疗结果的范围,使其包括各种形式的幸福感(心境平和、活力、连通性);(4)在整个治疗过程中反复评估机制和结果,以模拟治疗变化的过程;(5)将非特定因素(治疗联盟、治疗依从性)作为机制进行调查;(6)在有效性研究中探索治疗机制。
{"title":"Examining domains of psychological flexibility and inflexibility as treatment mechanisms in acceptance and commitment therapy: A comprehensive systematic and meta-analytic review","authors":"Jenna A. Macri,&nbsp;Ronald D. Rogge","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102432","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102432","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The current systematic and meta-analytic review sought to integrate a growing number of studies examining dimensions of psychological flexibility as treatment mechanisms for Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). Analyses of 77 records (67 unique studies; N<sub>total</sub> = 9123 participants) from comprehensive searches of multiple databases suggested that ACT interventions led to reduced inflexibility (i.e., lowered global inflexibility, lack of present moment awareness, cognitive fusion, experiential avoidance, self-as-content, &amp; inaction) and increased flexibility (i.e., committed action/contact with values, global flexibility/acceptance, &amp; defusion). Those changes remained significant when ACT was compared with waitlist or active treatments and were significantly linked to corresponding drops in psychological distress, supporting their roles as ACT treatment mechanisms. Moderation analyses revealed that the use of student samples, exclusion of clinically symptomatic individuals, and comparisons of ACT with other active treatments weakened these effects whereas offering ACT as an individual therapy and excluding individuals in extreme crisis (i.e., with suicidal ideation) strengthened them. The meta-analytic findings and systematic review suggested specific recommendations for future clinical work and research on ACT mechanisms: (1) Evaluate both psychological flexibility and inflexibility as distinct treatment mechanisms, (2) Evaluate specific dimensions of psychological flexibility/inflexibility as mechanisms with multidimensional scales (CompACT, MPFI), (3) Broaden treatment outcomes to include forms of wellbeing (peace of mind, vitality, connectedness), (4) Assess mechanisms and outcomes repeatedly throughout treatment to model the process of therapeutic change, (5) Investigate non-specific factors (therapeutic alliance, treatment adherence) as mechanisms, and (6) Explore treatment mechanisms in effectiveness studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140550886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adjustment and homesickness in hospitalised children: A systematic review 住院儿童的适应和思乡情绪:系统回顾
IF 12.8 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102431
Eleni Andrea Demetriou , Kelsie Anne Boulton , Michael Russell Bowden , Adam John Guastella

Children can experience significant distress during hospitalisation, as a result of the treatment process and due to psychosocial factors impacting their adjustment to the hospital environment. Such factors can contribute to negative outcomes for the child. Despite this, limited research focus has been placed on understanding the psychosocial factors that contribute to a child's distress to inform support strategies that can improve the experience of hospitalisation across paediatric conditions. The objectives of this review were to synthesise the qualitative and quantitative literature on psychosocial factors associated with hospital adjustment and to identify risk and protective factors that influence the adjustment process. The literature search (1980 to February 2024: CINAHL / Embase / Medline / PsychINFO and Web of Science databases) identified thirty-four studies. Poor hospital adjustment, anxiety, depression and homesickness, were reported by the majority of hospitalised children. Several demographic and psychosocial factors were identified in the quantitative synthesis to contribute to poor adjustment. Child age, temperament, attachment style, past negative hospital experiences, homesickness and fear cognitions, were all associated with adjustment to the hospital environment. Homesickness was identified as a particularly understudied and important construct. Theoretical and methodological considerations are discussed, and recommendations made for future research that can further support inpatient children and their families.

在住院期间,由于治疗过程和影响儿童适应医院环境的社会心理因素,儿童可能会经历巨大的痛苦。这些因素会对儿童造成负面影响。尽管如此,有关了解导致儿童痛苦的社会心理因素的研究却很有限,而这些因素可以为改善儿科住院体验的支持策略提供参考。本综述的目的是综合与住院适应相关的社会心理因素的定性和定量文献,并确定影响适应过程的风险和保护因素。文献检索(1980 年至 2024 年 2 月:CINAHL/Embase/Medline/PsychINFO和Web of Science数据库)共发现了34项研究。大多数住院儿童都报告了住院适应不良、焦虑、抑郁和想家等问题。定量综合研究发现了导致适应不良的几个人口和社会心理因素。儿童的年龄、性情、依恋方式、过去在医院的负面经历、思乡情绪和恐惧认知都与对医院环境的适应有关。思乡病被认为是一个研究不足的重要因素。本文讨论了理论和方法上的考虑因素,并为今后的研究提出了建议,以进一步支持住院儿童及其家庭。
{"title":"Adjustment and homesickness in hospitalised children: A systematic review","authors":"Eleni Andrea Demetriou ,&nbsp;Kelsie Anne Boulton ,&nbsp;Michael Russell Bowden ,&nbsp;Adam John Guastella","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102431","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102431","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Children can experience significant distress during hospitalisation, as a result of the treatment process and due to psychosocial factors impacting their adjustment to the hospital environment. Such factors can contribute to negative outcomes for the child. Despite this, limited research focus has been placed on understanding the psychosocial factors that contribute to a child's distress to inform support strategies that can improve the experience of hospitalisation across paediatric conditions. The objectives of this review were to synthesise the qualitative and quantitative literature on psychosocial factors associated with hospital adjustment and to identify risk and protective factors that influence the adjustment process. The literature search (1980 to February 2024: CINAHL / Embase / Medline / PsychINFO and Web of Science databases) identified thirty-four studies. Poor hospital adjustment, anxiety, depression and homesickness, were reported by the majority of hospitalised children. Several demographic and psychosocial factors were identified in the quantitative synthesis to contribute to poor adjustment. Child age, temperament, attachment style, past negative hospital experiences, homesickness and fear cognitions, were all associated with adjustment to the hospital environment. Homesickness was identified as a particularly understudied and important construct. Theoretical and methodological considerations are discussed, and recommendations made for future research that can further support inpatient children and their families.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824000527/pdfft?md5=662d1133905d9f97eb71226309dceb5c&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824000527-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140555198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Modifiable parental factors associated with the mental health of youth from immigrant families in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis 与高收入国家移民家庭青少年心理健康有关的可改变的父母因素:系统回顾与荟萃分析
IF 12.8 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102429
Sunita Bayyavarapu Bapuji , Ashlyn Hansen , Miriam H. Marembo , Patrick Olivier , Marie Bee Hui Yap

Parental factors play a major role in youth mental health and many youth in high-income countries have at least one overseas-born parent. It is, hence, important to understand how immigrant parenting is associated with youth mental health in high-income countries. Following PRISMA guidelines, this review sought to identify modifiable parental factors to inform parenting interventions to prevent mental health problems in youth aged 0–18 years whose parents migrated voluntarily for economic reasons from low and middle-income countries to high-income countries.

Sixteen parental factors were identified from 56 studies that were associated with five outcomes – youth self-esteem (k = 17), general stress (k = 4), acculturative stress (k = 4), anxiety symptoms (k = 9), and depressive symptoms (k = 41). A sound evidence base was found for one or more of these outcomes associated with protective factors – caring and supportive parenting and parental monitoring; and risk factors – parent-youth acculturative and general conflict, parental withdrawal, interparental conflict, and parent mental health problems.

This systematic review and meta-analysis identified immigrant parental factors that have robust associations with youth mental health outcomes. These findings can be used to inform parenting interventions and support immigrant parents in preventing youth mental health problems.

父母因素在青少年心理健康中扮演着重要角色,而在高收入国家,许多青少年的父母中至少有一人在海外出生。因此,了解移民养育子女与高收入国家青少年心理健康的关系非常重要。根据PRISMA指南,本综述试图找出可改变的父母因素,以指导父母对0-18岁、父母因经济原因自愿从中低收入国家移民到高收入国家的青少年采取干预措施,预防其出现心理健康问题。本系统综述和荟萃分析确定了与青少年心理健康结果密切相关的移民父母因素。这些研究结果可用于指导育儿干预措施,支持移民父母预防青少年心理健康问题。
{"title":"Modifiable parental factors associated with the mental health of youth from immigrant families in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Sunita Bayyavarapu Bapuji ,&nbsp;Ashlyn Hansen ,&nbsp;Miriam H. Marembo ,&nbsp;Patrick Olivier ,&nbsp;Marie Bee Hui Yap","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102429","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102429","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Parental factors play a major role in youth mental health and many youth in high-income countries have at least one overseas-born parent. It is, hence, important to understand how immigrant parenting is associated with youth mental health in high-income countries. Following PRISMA guidelines, this review sought to identify modifiable parental factors to inform parenting interventions to prevent mental health problems in youth aged 0–18 years whose parents migrated voluntarily for economic reasons from low and middle-income countries to high-income countries.</p><p>Sixteen parental factors were identified from 56 studies that were associated with five outcomes – youth self-esteem (<em>k</em> = 17), general stress (<em>k</em> = 4), acculturative stress (<em>k</em> = 4), anxiety symptoms (<em>k</em> = 9), and depressive symptoms (<em>k</em> = 41). A sound evidence base was found for one or more of these outcomes associated with protective factors – caring and supportive parenting and parental monitoring; and risk factors – parent-youth acculturative and general conflict, parental withdrawal, interparental conflict, and parent mental health problems.</p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis identified immigrant parental factors that have robust associations with youth mental health outcomes. These findings can be used to inform parenting interventions and support immigrant parents in preventing youth mental health problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824000503/pdfft?md5=95cd15ca0680be23052fcde9d861b26c&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824000503-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140621026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A meta-analysis of cognitive reappraisal and personal resilience 认知再评价与个人复原力的荟萃分析
IF 12.8 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102428
Alexander D. Stover, Josh Shulkin, Andrew Lac, Timothy Rapp

Cognitive reappraisal, an adaptive emotion regulation strategy that involves subjectively reinterpreting stressful and adverse experiences in a more positive manner, can enhance personal resilience. Personal resilience is a constellation of attributes that facilitate successful coping and an expeditious return to adaptive functioning after exposure to stress or adversity. This meta-analysis evaluated the association between cognitive reappraisal and personal resilience. A systematic and exhaustive search identified 64 independent samples from 55 studies (N = 29,824) that examined the correlation between cognitive reappraisal and personal resilience. A random-effects model revealed a positive summary effect (r = 0.47, p < .001), indicating that higher cognitive reappraisal was associated with higher personal resilience. Six potential meta-moderators were tested: culture, age, name of the cognitive reappraisal measure, name of the personal resilience measure, study design, and publication period. After two extreme effect size outliers were omitted, tests of publication bias did not reveal any publication bias in this line of research. This quantitative synthesis offers compelling evidence showing that cognitive reappraisal skills operate as a protective strategy against stress and adversity and, therefore, enhance personal resilience. The protective benefits of cognitive reappraisal in relation to personal resilience are relatively robust, as the correlations were statistically significant for all subgroups in the meta-moderation analyses.

认知再评价是一种适应性情绪调节策略,它涉及以更积极的方式主观地重新解释压力和不利经历,可以增强个人复原力。个人复原力是指在面临压力或逆境后,能够促进成功应对并迅速恢复适应性功能的一系列属性。本荟萃分析评估了认知再评价与个人复原力之间的关联。通过系统而详尽的搜索,我们从55项研究(N = 29,824)中找到了64个独立样本,这些样本研究了认知再评价与个人复原力之间的相关性。随机效应模型显示了一个正的总结效应(r = 0.47, p <.001),表明认知再评价越高,个人复原力越高。对六个潜在的元调节因子进行了测试:文化、年龄、认知再评价指标名称、个人复原力指标名称、研究设计和出版时间。在剔除了两个极端效应大小异常值之后,对发表偏差的测试并未发现该研究方向存在任何发表偏差。本定量综述提供了令人信服的证据,表明认知重评技能是一种抵御压力和逆境的保护性策略,因此可以增强个人抗逆力。认知重评对个人复原力的保护性益处是相对稳健的,因为在元模式分析中,所有亚组的相关性在统计学上都是显著的。
{"title":"A meta-analysis of cognitive reappraisal and personal resilience","authors":"Alexander D. Stover,&nbsp;Josh Shulkin,&nbsp;Andrew Lac,&nbsp;Timothy Rapp","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102428","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102428","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cognitive reappraisal, an adaptive emotion regulation strategy that involves subjectively reinterpreting stressful and adverse experiences in a more positive manner, can enhance personal resilience. Personal resilience is a constellation of attributes that facilitate successful coping and an expeditious return to adaptive functioning after exposure to stress or adversity. This meta-analysis evaluated the association between cognitive reappraisal and personal resilience. A systematic and exhaustive search identified 64 independent samples from 55 studies (<em>N</em> = 29,824) that examined the correlation between cognitive reappraisal and personal resilience. A random-effects model revealed a positive summary effect (<em>r</em> = 0.47, <em>p</em> &lt; .001), indicating that higher cognitive reappraisal was associated with higher personal resilience. Six potential meta-moderators were tested: culture, age, name of the cognitive reappraisal measure, name of the personal resilience measure, study design, and publication period. After two extreme effect size outliers were omitted, tests of publication bias did not reveal any publication bias in this line of research. This quantitative synthesis offers compelling evidence showing that cognitive reappraisal skills operate as a protective strategy against stress and adversity and, therefore, enhance personal resilience. The protective benefits of cognitive reappraisal in relation to personal resilience are relatively robust, as the correlations were statistically significant for all subgroups in the meta-moderation analyses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140638523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cultural challenges for adapting behavioral intervention frameworks: A critical examination from a cultural psychology perspective 调整行为干预框架的文化挑战:从文化心理学角度进行批判性研究
IF 12.8 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102425
Ronald Fischer , Yuki Bailey , Megha Shankar , Nadia Safaeinili , Johannes A. Karl , Adam Daly , Finley Ngarangi Johnson , Taylor Winter , Hitaua Arahanga-Doyle , Ririwai Fox , Amina Abubakar , Donna Michelle Zulman

We introduce the bias and equivalence framework to highlight how concepts, methods, and tools from cultural psychology can contribute to successful cultural adaptation and implementation of behavioral interventions. To situate our contribution, we provide a review of recent cultural adaptation research and existing frameworks. We identified 68 different frameworks that have been cited when reporting cultural adaptations and highlight three major adaptation dimensions that can be used to differentiate adaptations. Regarding effectiveness, we found an average effect size of zr = 0.24 (95%CI 0.20, 0.29) in 24 meta-analyses published since 2014, but also substantive differences across domains and unclear effects of the extent of cultural adaptations. To advance cultural adaptation efforts, we outline a framework that integrates key steps from previous cultural adaptation frameworks and highlight how cultural bias and equivalence considerations in conjunction with community engagement help a) in the diagnosis of behavioral or psychological problems, b) identification of possible interventions, c) the selection of specific mechanisms of behavior change, d) the specification and documentation of dose effects and thresholds for diagnosis, e) entry and exit points within intervention programs, and f) cost-benefit-sustainability discussions. We provide guiding questions that may help researchers when adapting interventions to novel cultural contexts.

我们介绍了偏差和等效框架,以强调文化心理学的概念、方法和工具如何有助于成功的文化适应和行为干预措施的实施。为了对我们的贡献进行定位,我们对最近的文化适应研究和现有框架进行了回顾。我们确定了 68 个在报告文化适应时被引用的不同框架,并强调了可用于区分适应的三个主要适应维度。关于有效性,我们发现自 2014 年以来发表的 24 项元分析的平均效应大小为 zr = 0.24(95%CI 0.20,0.29),但不同领域之间也存在实质性差异,文化适应程度的影响也不明确。为了推进文化适应工作,我们概述了一个框架,该框架整合了以往文化适应框架中的关键步骤,并强调了文化偏差和等效性考虑因素与社区参与相结合如何帮助 a) 诊断行为或心理问题;b) 识别可能的干预措施;c) 选择特定的行为改变机制;d) 剂量效应和诊断阈值的规范和记录;e) 干预项目中的进入点和退出点;以及 f) 成本效益-可持续性讨论。我们提出的指导性问题可以帮助研究人员根据新的文化背景调整干预措施。
{"title":"Cultural challenges for adapting behavioral intervention frameworks: A critical examination from a cultural psychology perspective","authors":"Ronald Fischer ,&nbsp;Yuki Bailey ,&nbsp;Megha Shankar ,&nbsp;Nadia Safaeinili ,&nbsp;Johannes A. Karl ,&nbsp;Adam Daly ,&nbsp;Finley Ngarangi Johnson ,&nbsp;Taylor Winter ,&nbsp;Hitaua Arahanga-Doyle ,&nbsp;Ririwai Fox ,&nbsp;Amina Abubakar ,&nbsp;Donna Michelle Zulman","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102425","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102425","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We introduce the bias and equivalence framework to highlight how concepts, methods, and tools from cultural psychology can contribute to successful cultural adaptation and implementation of behavioral interventions. To situate our contribution, we provide a review of recent cultural adaptation research and existing frameworks. We identified 68 different frameworks that have been cited when reporting cultural adaptations and highlight three major adaptation dimensions that can be used to differentiate adaptations. Regarding effectiveness, we found an average effect size of <em>z</em><sub><em>r</em></sub> <em>= 0</em>.24 (95%CI 0.20, 0.29) in 24 meta-analyses published since 2014, but also substantive differences across domains and unclear effects of the extent of cultural adaptations. To advance cultural adaptation efforts, we outline a framework that integrates key steps from previous cultural adaptation frameworks and highlight how cultural bias and equivalence considerations in conjunction with community engagement help a) in the diagnosis of behavioral or psychological problems, b) identification of possible interventions, c) the selection of specific mechanisms of behavior change, d) the specification and documentation of dose effects and thresholds for diagnosis, e) entry and exit points within intervention programs, and f) cost-benefit-sustainability discussions. We provide guiding questions that may help researchers when adapting interventions to novel cultural contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140548857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychological wellbeing in parents of children with Down syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis 唐氏综合征患儿父母的心理健康:系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 12.8 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102426
T.L. Rutter , R.P. Hastings , C.A. Murray , N. Enoch , S. Johnson , C. Stinton

We report a review examining the psychological wellbeing of parents of children with Down syndrome (DS) relative to that of parents of typically developing (TD) children. A systematic search identified 57 relevant studies, which were synthesised meta-analytically. Relative to their counterparts with TD children, mothers and fathers of children with DS reported higher levels of parenting stress (mothers: g = 0.57, 95% CI [0.33, 0.81]; fathers: g = 0.40, [0.24, 0.56]), depressive symptoms (mothers: g = 0.42, [0.23, 0.61]; fathers: g = 0.25, [0.02, 0.48]) and psychological distress (mothers: g = 0.45, [0.30, 0.60]; fathers: g = 0.63, [0.26, 0.99]). Small effects were found for anxiety for mothers (g = 0.16, [0.03, 0.29]), with no differences for fathers (g = 0.03, [−0.25, 0.32]). No group differences were found for positive impact of parenting (mothers: g = −0.09, [−0.25, 0.07]; fathers: g = −0.04, [−0.30, 0.22]), while evidence concerning other positive wellbeing outcomes was limited. No significant moderating effects of child age range, country income level, or group differences in parental education level were identified, but limited subgroup analyses were possible. Raising a child with DS may be associated with elevated stress, depressive symptoms, and psychological distress for mothers and fathers. However, levels of parenting reward appear equivalent to those experienced by parents raising TD children.

我们对唐氏综合症(DS)患儿父母的心理健康与发育正常(TD)患儿父母的心理健康进行了回顾性研究。通过系统检索,我们发现了 57 项相关研究,并对这些研究进行了元分析综合。与 TD 儿童的父母相比,唐氏综合症儿童的母亲和父亲报告的养育压力水平更高(母亲:g = 0.57,95% CI [0.33,0.81];父亲:g = 0.40,[0.24,0.56])、抑郁症状(母亲:g = 0.42,[0.23,0.61];父亲:g = 0.25,[0.02,0.48])和心理困扰(母亲:g = 0.45,[0.30,0.60];父亲:g = 0.63,[0.26,0.99])。焦虑对母亲的影响较小(g = 0.16,[0.03,0.29]),对父亲则无差异(g = 0.03,[-0.25,0.32])。在养育子女的积极影响方面没有发现群体差异(母亲:g = -0.09,[-0.25,0.07];父亲:g = -0.04,[-0.30,0.22]),而有关其他积极幸福结果的证据有限。没有发现儿童年龄范围、国家收入水平或父母教育水平的群体差异有明显的调节作用,但可以进行有限的亚组分析。抚养 DS 患儿可能会给母亲和父亲带来更大的压力、抑郁症状和心理困扰。然而,养育子女的回报水平似乎与养育TD儿童的父母的回报水平相当。
{"title":"Psychological wellbeing in parents of children with Down syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"T.L. Rutter ,&nbsp;R.P. Hastings ,&nbsp;C.A. Murray ,&nbsp;N. Enoch ,&nbsp;S. Johnson ,&nbsp;C. Stinton","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102426","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102426","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We report a review examining the psychological wellbeing of parents of children with Down syndrome (DS) relative to that of parents of typically developing (TD) children. A systematic search identified 57 relevant studies, which were synthesised meta-analytically. Relative to their counterparts with TD children, mothers and fathers of children with DS reported higher levels of parenting stress (mothers: <em>g</em> <em>=</em> 0.57, 95% CI [0.33, 0.81]; fathers: <em>g</em> <em>=</em> 0.40, [0.24, 0.56]), depressive symptoms (mothers: <em>g</em> <em>=</em> 0.42, [0.23, 0.61]; fathers: <em>g</em> <em>=</em> 0.25, [0.02, 0.48]) and psychological distress (mothers: <em>g</em> <em>=</em> 0.45, [0.30, 0.60]; fathers: <em>g</em> <em>=</em> 0.63, [0.26, 0.99]). Small effects were found for anxiety for mothers (<em>g</em> <em>=</em> 0.16, [0.03, 0.29]), with no differences for fathers (<em>g</em> <em>=</em> 0.03, [−0.25, 0.32]). No group differences were found for positive impact of parenting (mothers: <em>g</em> <em>=</em> −0.09, [−0.25, 0.07]; fathers: <em>g</em> <em>=</em> −0.04, [−0.30, 0.22]), while evidence concerning other positive wellbeing outcomes was limited. No significant moderating effects of child age range, country income level, or group differences in parental education level were identified, but limited subgroup analyses were possible. Raising a child with DS may be associated with elevated stress, depressive symptoms, and psychological distress for mothers and fathers. However, levels of parenting reward appear equivalent to those experienced by parents raising TD children.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824000473/pdfft?md5=ece56f372b7d8f3c858fe66774e8ca7d&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824000473-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140638522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The future of psychological treatments: The Marburg Declaration 心理治疗的未来:马尔堡宣言
IF 12.8 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102417
Winfried Rief , Gordon J.G. Asmundson , Richard A. Bryant , David M. Clark , Anke Ehlers , Emily A. Holmes , Richard J. McNally , Carmem B. Neufeld , Sabine Wilhelm , Adam C. Jaroszewski , Max Berg , Anke Haberkamp , Stefan G. Hofmann , the PsyChange consortium

Although psychological treatments are broadly recognized as evidence-based interventions for various mental disorders, challenges remain. For example, a substantial proportion of patients receiving such treatments do not fully recover, and many obstacles hinder the dissemination, implementation, and training of psychological treatments. These problems require those in our field to rethink some of our basic models of mental disorders and their treatments, and question how research and practice in clinical psychology should progress. To answer these questions, a group of experts of clinical psychology convened at a Think-Tank in Marburg, Germany, in August 2022 to review the evidence and analyze barriers for current and future developments. After this event, an overview of the current state-of-the-art was drafted and suggestions for improvements and specific recommendations for research and practice were integrated. Recommendations arising from our meeting cover further improving psychological interventions through translational approaches, improving clinical research methodology, bridging the gap between more nomothetic (group-oriented) studies and idiographic (person-centered) decisions, using network approaches in addition to selecting single mechanisms to embrace the complexity of clinical reality, making use of scalable digital options for assessments and interventions, improving the training and education of future psychotherapists, and accepting the societal responsibilities that clinical psychology has in improving national and global health care. The objective of the Marburg Declaration is to stimulate a significant change regarding our understanding of mental disorders and their treatments, with the aim to trigger a new era of evidence-based psychological interventions.

尽管心理治疗被广泛认为是治疗各种精神障碍的循证干预措施,但挑战依然存在。例如,相当一部分接受此类治疗的患者并没有完全康复,心理治疗的推广、实施和培训也面临着许多障碍。这些问题要求我们的从业人员重新思考精神障碍及其治疗的一些基本模式,并质疑临床心理学的研究和实践应该如何发展。为了回答这些问题,一群临床心理学专家于 2022 年 8 月在德国马尔堡召开了一次智囊团会议,回顾证据并分析当前和未来发展的障碍。会后,我们起草了一份当前最先进技术的概述,并整合了改进意见以及对研究和实践的具体建议。会议提出的建议包括:通过转化方法进一步改进心理干预;改进临床研究方法;弥合更多唯名论(以群体为导向)研究与唯实论(以个人为中心)决策之间的差距;除了选择单一机制外,还使用网络方法来应对临床现实的复杂性;利用可扩展的数字选项进行评估和干预;改进对未来心理治疗师的培训和教育;以及接受临床心理学在改善国家和全球医疗保健方面所承担的社会责任。马尔堡宣言》的目标是促使我们对精神障碍及其治疗的理解发生重大变化,从而开创一个循证心理干预的新时代。
{"title":"The future of psychological treatments: The Marburg Declaration","authors":"Winfried Rief ,&nbsp;Gordon J.G. Asmundson ,&nbsp;Richard A. Bryant ,&nbsp;David M. Clark ,&nbsp;Anke Ehlers ,&nbsp;Emily A. Holmes ,&nbsp;Richard J. McNally ,&nbsp;Carmem B. Neufeld ,&nbsp;Sabine Wilhelm ,&nbsp;Adam C. Jaroszewski ,&nbsp;Max Berg ,&nbsp;Anke Haberkamp ,&nbsp;Stefan G. Hofmann ,&nbsp;the PsyChange consortium","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102417","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102417","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although psychological treatments are broadly recognized as evidence-based interventions for various mental disorders, challenges remain. For example, a substantial proportion of patients receiving such treatments do not fully recover, and many obstacles hinder the dissemination, implementation, and training of psychological treatments. These problems require those in our field to rethink some of our basic models of mental disorders and their treatments, and question how research and practice in clinical psychology should progress. To answer these questions, a group of experts of clinical psychology convened at a Think-Tank in Marburg, Germany, in August 2022 to review the evidence and analyze barriers for current and future developments. After this event, an overview of the current state-of-the-art was drafted and suggestions for improvements and specific recommendations for research and practice were integrated. Recommendations arising from our meeting cover further improving psychological interventions through translational approaches, improving clinical research methodology, bridging the gap between more nomothetic (group-oriented) studies and idiographic (person-centered) decisions, using network approaches in addition to selecting single mechanisms to embrace the complexity of clinical reality, making use of scalable digital options for assessments and interventions, improving the training and education of future psychotherapists, and accepting the societal responsibilities that clinical psychology has in improving national and global health care. The objective of the Marburg Declaration is to stimulate a significant change regarding our understanding of mental disorders and their treatments, with the aim to trigger a new era of evidence-based psychological interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824000382/pdfft?md5=a3e906532cbf234b0da834412c77e021&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824000382-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140403299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1