首页 > 最新文献

American Psychologist最新文献

英文 中文
Stanley R. Graham (1926-2023). 斯坦利-R-格雷厄姆(1926-2023)。
IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001365
Daniel Kaplin

Memorializes Stanley R. Graham (1926-2023). In the late 1970s, Stanley Graham became president of the Association of Psychologists in Private Practice. During his presidency, he proposed merging with the APA. Ultimately, these efforts were successful, leading to the Division of Psychologists in Independent Practice (Division 42), and Stanley became its first president in 1982. During the end of the 1980s and entering the 1990s, the APA was at a crossroads. There was a real possibility that the APA would splinter into four distinct societies. During his presidency in 1990, Graham bridged this divide by helping with the creation of the science, education, public interest, and practice directorates. Stanley helped to unify this divide and to develop a sustaining organizational structure for the association. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

纪念斯坦利-格雷厄姆(Stanley R. Graham,1926-2023 年)。20 世纪 70 年代末,斯坦利-格雷厄姆成为私人执业心理学家协会主席。在担任主席期间,他提议与美国心理学会合并。最终,这些努力获得了成功,成立了独立执业心理学家分部(42 分部),斯坦利于 1982 年成为该分部的首任主席。20 世纪 80 年代末,进入 20 世纪 90 年代,美国心理学会正处于十字路口。美国心理学会很有可能分裂成四个不同的协会。在 1990 年担任主席期间,格雷厄姆帮助创建了科学、教育、公共利益和实践部门,从而弥合了这一分歧。斯坦利帮助统一了这一分歧,并为协会制定了一个可持续发展的组织结构。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Stanley R. Graham (1926-2023).","authors":"Daniel Kaplin","doi":"10.1037/amp0001365","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001365","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Memorializes Stanley R. Graham (1926-2023). In the late 1970s, Stanley Graham became president of the Association of Psychologists in Private Practice. During his presidency, he proposed merging with the APA. Ultimately, these efforts were successful, leading to the Division of Psychologists in Independent Practice (Division 42), and Stanley became its first president in 1982. During the end of the 1980s and entering the 1990s, the APA was at a crossroads. There was a real possibility that the APA would splinter into four distinct societies. During his presidency in 1990, Graham bridged this divide by helping with the creation of the science, education, public interest, and practice directorates. Stanley helped to unify this divide and to develop a sustaining organizational structure for the association. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142401646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nancy Elinor Adler (1946-2024). 南希-埃莉诺-阿德勒(1946-2024)。
IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-11 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001377
Elissa Sarah Epel

Nancy was born in Manhattan in 1946. As a young girl, she was charmed by books about the teenage detective Nancy Drew and felt the books gave her an indelible enthusiasm for solving mysteries. Nancy graduated from Wellesley College (1968) and received her PhD from Harvard (1973) in social psychology. An APA Fellow, Nancy is one of the most cited scientists (top 0.1%) in the world (2022, Clarivate). She was a pioneer who shaped several key movements, including defining the field of Health Psychology, and deepening global recognition of social determinants of health. She won numerous honors and awards, including the David Rall Medal from the National Academy of Medicine. Nancy died at 77 at her home, on January 4, 2024, surrounded by loving family. The UCSF Center for Health and Community is establishing an annual Nancy Elinor Adler Endowed Lectureship Award for scholars who "illuminate the field of social and health disparities and conduct meaningful interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

南希 1946 年出生于曼哈顿。年少时,她就被少年侦探南希-德鲁(Nancy Drew)的书迷住了,觉得这些书给了她不可磨灭的解谜热情。南希 1968 年毕业于韦尔斯利学院,1973 年获得哈佛大学社会心理学博士学位。作为美国心理学会会员,南希是世界上被引用次数最多的科学家之一(前 0.1%)(2022 年,Clarivate)。她是一位先驱者,引领了多项重要运动,包括定义了健康心理学领域,加深了全球对健康的社会决定因素的认识。她赢得了无数荣誉和奖项,包括美国国家医学院颁发的大卫-拉尔奖章。2024 年 1 月 4 日,南希在家中去世,享年 77 岁,由她深爱的家人陪伴。加州大学旧金山分校健康与社区中心正在设立南希-埃莉诺-阿德勒年度捐赠讲座奖,以奖励那些 "照亮社会和健康差异领域并进行有意义的干预 "的学者。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Nancy Elinor Adler (1946-2024).","authors":"Elissa Sarah Epel","doi":"10.1037/amp0001377","DOIUrl":"10.1037/amp0001377","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nancy was born in Manhattan in 1946. As a young girl, she was charmed by books about the teenage detective Nancy Drew and felt the books gave her an indelible enthusiasm for solving mysteries. Nancy graduated from Wellesley College (1968) and received her PhD from Harvard (1973) in social psychology. An APA Fellow, Nancy is one of the most cited scientists (top 0.1%) in the world (2022, Clarivate). She was a pioneer who shaped several key movements, including defining the field of Health Psychology, and deepening global recognition of social determinants of health. She won numerous honors and awards, including the David Rall Medal from the National Academy of Medicine. Nancy died at 77 at her home, on January 4, 2024, surrounded by loving family. The UCSF Center for Health and Community is establishing an annual Nancy Elinor Adler Endowed Lectureship Award for scholars who \"illuminate the field of social and health disparities and conduct meaningful interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141591779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A quasi-experimental study examining the efficacy of multimodal bot screening tools and recommendations to preserve data integrity in online psychological research. 一项准实验研究,探讨多模式僵尸筛查工具的功效,以及在在线心理研究中维护数据完整性的建议。
IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-20 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001183
Melissa Simone, Cory J Cascalheira, Benjamin G Pierce

Bots are automated software programs that pose an ongoing threat to psychological research by invading online research studies and their increasing sophistication over time. Despite this growing concern, research in this area has been limited to bot detection in existing data sets following an unexpected encounter with bots. The present three-condition, quasi-experimental study aimed to address this gap in the literature by examining the efficacy of three types of bot screening tools across three incentive conditions ($0, $1, and $5). Data were collected from 444 respondents via Twitter advertisements between July and September 2021. The efficacy of five task-based (i.e., anagrams, visual search), question-based (i.e., attention checks, ReCAPTCHA), and data-based (i.e., consistency, metadata) tools was examined with Bonferroni-adjusted univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. In general, study results suggest that bot screening tools function similarly for participants recruited across incentive conditions. Moreover, the present analyses revealed heterogeneity in the efficacy of bot screening tool subtypes. Notably, the present results suggest that the least effective bot screening tools were among the most commonly used tools in existing literature (e.g., ReCAPTCHA). In sum, the study findings revealed highly effective and highly ineffective bot screening tools. Study design and data integrity recommendations for researchers are provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

机器人是一种自动化软件程序,它入侵在线研究,并随着时间的推移变得越来越复杂,从而对心理研究构成了持续的威胁。尽管这一问题日益受到关注,但该领域的研究仅限于在意外遭遇机器人后在现有数据集中进行机器人检测。本项三条件准实验研究旨在通过考察三种类型的僵尸筛选工具在三种激励条件(0 美元、1 美元和 5 美元)下的功效,填补文献中的这一空白。研究人员在 2021 年 7 月至 9 月期间通过 Twitter 广告从 444 名受访者处收集了数据。通过 Bonferroni-adjusted 单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,考察了五种基于任务(即猜谜语、视觉搜索)、基于问题(即注意力检查、ReCAPTCHA)和基于数据(即一致性、元数据)的工具的有效性。总体而言,研究结果表明,机器人筛查工具对不同激励条件下招募的参与者具有相似的功能。此外,本分析还揭示了机器人筛查工具亚型功效的异质性。值得注意的是,本研究结果表明,效果最差的机器人筛选工具属于现有文献中最常用的工具(如 ReCAPTCHA)。总之,研究结果揭示了高度有效和高度无效的僵尸筛选工具。本研究还为研究人员提供了研究设计和数据完整性方面的建议。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"A quasi-experimental study examining the efficacy of multimodal bot screening tools and recommendations to preserve data integrity in online psychological research.","authors":"Melissa Simone, Cory J Cascalheira, Benjamin G Pierce","doi":"10.1037/amp0001183","DOIUrl":"10.1037/amp0001183","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bots are automated software programs that pose an ongoing threat to psychological research by invading online research studies and their increasing sophistication over time. Despite this growing concern, research in this area has been limited to bot detection in existing data sets following an unexpected encounter with bots. The present three-condition, quasi-experimental study aimed to address this gap in the literature by examining the efficacy of three types of bot screening tools across three incentive conditions ($0, $1, and $5). Data were collected from 444 respondents via Twitter advertisements between July and September 2021. The efficacy of five <i>task-based</i> (i.e., anagrams, visual search), <i>question-based</i> (i.e., attention checks, ReCAPTCHA), and <i>data-based</i> (i.e., consistency, metadata) tools was examined with Bonferroni-adjusted univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. In general, study results suggest that bot screening tools function similarly for participants recruited across incentive conditions. Moreover, the present analyses revealed heterogeneity in the efficacy of bot screening tool subtypes. Notably, the present results suggest that the least effective bot screening tools were among the most commonly used tools in existing literature (e.g., ReCAPTCHA). In sum, the study findings revealed highly effective and highly ineffective bot screening tools. Study design and data integrity recommendations for researchers are provided. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10799166/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10077975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Facial recognition technology and human raters can predict political orientation from images of expressionless faces even when controlling for demographics and self-presentation. 即使在控制人口统计学和自我介绍的情况下,人脸识别技术和人类评分员也能从无表情的人脸图像中预测政治倾向。
IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-21 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001295
Michal Kosinski, Poruz Khambatta, Yilun Wang

Carefully standardized facial images of 591 participants were taken in the laboratory while controlling for self-presentation, facial expression, head orientation, and image properties. They were presented to human raters and a facial recognition algorithm: both humans (r = .21) and the algorithm (r = .22) could predict participants' scores on a political orientation scale (Cronbach's α = .94) decorrelated with age, gender, and ethnicity. These effects are on par with how well job interviews predict job success, or alcohol drives aggressiveness. The algorithm's predictive accuracy was even higher (r = .31) when it leveraged information on participants' age, gender, and ethnicity. Moreover, the associations between facial appearance and political orientation seem to generalize beyond our sample: The predictive model derived from standardized images (while controlling for age, gender, and ethnicity) could predict political orientation (r ≈ .13) from naturalistic images of 3,401 politicians from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. The analysis of facial features associated with political orientation revealed that conservatives tended to have larger lower faces. The predictability of political orientation from standardized images has critical implications for privacy, the regulation of facial recognition technology, and understanding the origins and consequences of political orientation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

在实验室中对 591 名参与者的面部图像进行了仔细的标准化处理,同时对自我介绍、面部表情、头部朝向和图像属性进行了控制。结果显示,人类(r = .21)和算法(r = .22)都能预测参与者在政治倾向量表上的得分(Cronbach's α = .94),但与年龄、性别和种族无关。这些效果与求职面试对工作成功的预测效果或酒精对攻击性的驱动效果相当。当算法利用参与者的年龄、性别和种族信息时,其预测准确度甚至更高(r = .31)。此外,面部外观与政治倾向之间的关联似乎超出了我们的样本范围:从标准化图像中得出的预测模型(同时控制年龄、性别和种族)可以从美国、英国和加拿大 3401 名政治家的自然图像中预测政治倾向(r ≈ .13)。对与政治倾向相关的面部特征的分析表明,保守派的脸型往往较大较低。从标准化图像中预测政治取向对隐私、面部识别技术的监管以及了解政治取向的起源和后果具有重要意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Facial recognition technology and human raters can predict political orientation from images of expressionless faces even when controlling for demographics and self-presentation.","authors":"Michal Kosinski, Poruz Khambatta, Yilun Wang","doi":"10.1037/amp0001295","DOIUrl":"10.1037/amp0001295","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carefully standardized facial images of 591 participants were taken in the laboratory while controlling for self-presentation, facial expression, head orientation, and image properties. They were presented to human raters and a facial recognition algorithm: both humans (r = .21) and the algorithm (<i>r</i> = .22) could predict participants' scores on a political orientation scale (Cronbach's α = .94) decorrelated with age, gender, and ethnicity. These effects are on par with how well job interviews predict job success, or alcohol drives aggressiveness. The algorithm's predictive accuracy was even higher (<i>r</i> = .31) when it leveraged information on participants' age, gender, and ethnicity. Moreover, the associations between facial appearance and political orientation seem to generalize beyond our sample: The predictive model derived from standardized images (while controlling for age, gender, and ethnicity) could predict political orientation (<i>r</i> ≈ .13) from naturalistic images of 3,401 politicians from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. The analysis of facial features associated with political orientation revealed that conservatives tended to have larger lower faces. The predictability of political orientation from standardized images has critical implications for privacy, the regulation of facial recognition technology, and understanding the origins and consequences of political orientation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140177211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Violence and aggression against educators and school personnel, retention, stress, and training needs: National survey results. 针对教育工作者和学校工作人员的暴力和侵害行为、留用、压力和培训需求:全国调查结果。
IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-30 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001348
Susan D McMahon, Frank C Worrell, Linda A Reddy, Andrew Martinez, Dorothy L Espelage, Ron A Astor, Eric M Anderman, Alberto Valido, Taylor Swenski, Andrew H Perry, Christopher M Dudek, Kailyn Bare

Aggression and violence against educators and school personnel have raised public health concerns that require attention from researchers, policymakers, and training providers in U.S. schools. School aggression and violence have negative effects on school personnel health and retention and on student achievement and development. In partnership with several national organizations, the American Psychological Association (APA) Task Force on Violence Against Educators and School Personnel administered two national, multi-informant, cross-sectional surveys. Time 1 data were collected in 2020-2021 from 14,966 respondents; participants reflected on their experiences of violence and aggression before COVID-19 and during COVID-19 restrictions in this survey. One year later, in 2022, 11,814 respondents completed the Time 2 survey after COVID-19 restrictions ended. Participants included teachers, school psychologists, social workers, counselors, staff members, and administrators from all 50 states and Puerto Rico. Rates of violence and aggression directed against educators by students, parents, colleagues, and administrators were substantial before COVID-19, were lower during COVID-19 restrictions, and returned to prepandemic levels or higher after COVID-19 restrictions. After COVID-19 restrictions, 22%-80% of respondents reported verbal or threatening aggression, and 2%-56% of respondents reported physical violence at least once during the year, varying by stakeholder role and aggressor. Rates of intentions to quit the profession ranged from 21% to 43% during COVID-19 restrictions (2020-2021) and from 23% to 57% after COVID-19 restrictions (2021-2022), varying by stakeholder role. Participants across roles reported substantial rates of anxiety and stress, especially during and after COVID-19 restrictions, and identified specific training needs. Implications for theory, research, training, and policy are presented. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

针对教育工作者和学校工作人员的侵犯和暴力行为已经引起了公共健康问题,需要美国学校的研究人员、政策制定者和培训机构予以关注。校园侵害和暴力对学校工作人员的健康和留任以及学生的成绩和发展都有负面影响。美国心理学会(APA)暴力侵害教育工作者和学校工作人员问题特别工作组与多个全国性组织合作,开展了两项全国性的多信息横断面调查。第一阶段的数据是在 2020-2021 年从 14966 名受访者中收集的;受访者在此次调查中反映了他们在 COVID-19 之前和 COVID-19 限制期间遭受暴力和侵害的经历。一年后,即 2022 年,11,814 名受访者在 COVID-19 限制结束后完成了时间 2 调查。参与者包括来自美国 50 个州和波多黎各的教师、学校心理学家、社会工作者、辅导员、工作人员和行政人员。在 COVID-19 之前,学生、家长、同事和行政人员针对教育工作者的暴力和攻击行为的发生率很高,在 COVID-19 限制期间发生率较低,而在 COVID-19 限制之后则恢复到流行前的水平或更高。在 COVID-19 限制措施实施后,22%-80% 的受访者报告在一年中至少遭受过一次口头或威胁性攻击,2%-56% 的受访者报告在一年中至少遭受过一次肢体暴力,因利益相关者的角色和攻击者而异。在 COVID-19 限制期间(2020-2021 年)和 COVID-19 限制之后(2021-2022 年),因利益相关者角色的不同,有意退出该行业的比例分别为 21% 至 43%,23% 至 57%。不同角色的参与者都报告了大量的焦虑和压力,尤其是在 COVID-19 限制期间和之后,并指出了具体的培训需求。本文介绍了对理论、研究、培训和政策的启示。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Violence and aggression against educators and school personnel, retention, stress, and training needs: National survey results.","authors":"Susan D McMahon, Frank C Worrell, Linda A Reddy, Andrew Martinez, Dorothy L Espelage, Ron A Astor, Eric M Anderman, Alberto Valido, Taylor Swenski, Andrew H Perry, Christopher M Dudek, Kailyn Bare","doi":"10.1037/amp0001348","DOIUrl":"10.1037/amp0001348","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aggression and violence against educators and school personnel have raised public health concerns that require attention from researchers, policymakers, and training providers in U.S. schools. School aggression and violence have negative effects on school personnel health and retention and on student achievement and development. In partnership with several national organizations, the American Psychological Association (APA) Task Force on Violence Against Educators and School Personnel administered two national, multi-informant, cross-sectional surveys. Time 1 data were collected in 2020-2021 from 14,966 respondents; participants reflected on their experiences of violence and aggression before COVID-19 and during COVID-19 restrictions in this survey. One year later, in 2022, 11,814 respondents completed the Time 2 survey after COVID-19 restrictions ended. Participants included teachers, school psychologists, social workers, counselors, staff members, and administrators from all 50 states and Puerto Rico. Rates of violence and aggression directed against educators by students, parents, colleagues, and administrators were substantial before COVID-19, were lower during COVID-19 restrictions, and returned to prepandemic levels or higher after COVID-19 restrictions. After COVID-19 restrictions, 22%-80% of respondents reported verbal or threatening aggression, and 2%-56% of respondents reported physical violence at least once during the year, varying by stakeholder role and aggressor. Rates of intentions to quit the profession ranged from 21% to 43% during COVID-19 restrictions (2020-2021) and from 23% to 57% after COVID-19 restrictions (2021-2022), varying by stakeholder role. Participants across roles reported substantial rates of anxiety and stress, especially during and after COVID-19 restrictions, and identified specific training needs. Implications for theory, research, training, and policy are presented. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141179902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ascribing understanding to ourselves and others. 把理解归于自己和他人。
IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-27 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001244
David R Olson

We commonly attribute an understanding of language to others including very young infants, and, more controversially, to other animals and computers. Although we adults attribute or "ascribe" understanding to very young children, only in the late preschool years do the children themselves begin to ascribe understanding to themselves and others a competence that comes with learning the meaning of the word "understand." It is argued that ascription of understanding to others allows the creation of shared belief while self-ascription allows one to introspect on one's understanding: to know that one understands, to understand expressions that young children would simply reject as false, and to understand hypotheticals and counterfactuals. This competence applies to both understanding spoken expressions and reading comprehension. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

我们通常把理解语言的能力归因于他人,包括非常年幼的婴儿,更有争议的是,我们把理解语言的能力归因于其他动物和计算机。虽然我们成年人认为或“归因于”非常年幼的孩子的理解能力,但只有在学龄前的最后几年,孩子们自己才开始认为理解自己和他人是一种能力,这种能力伴随着学习“理解”这个词的含义而来。有人认为,将理解归因于他人可以创造共同的信念,而自我归因于可以让一个人反思自己的理解:知道自己理解,理解年幼的孩子会简单地拒绝为错误的表达,并理解假设和反事实。这种能力既适用于理解口语表达,也适用于阅读理解。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Ascribing understanding to ourselves and others.","authors":"David R Olson","doi":"10.1037/amp0001244","DOIUrl":"10.1037/amp0001244","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We commonly attribute an understanding of language to others including very young infants, and, more controversially, to other animals and computers. Although we adults attribute or \"ascribe\" understanding to very young children, only in the late preschool years do the children themselves begin to ascribe understanding to themselves and others a competence that comes with learning the meaning of the word \"understand.\" It is argued that ascription of understanding to others allows the creation of shared belief while self-ascription allows one to introspect on one's understanding: to know that one understands, to understand expressions that young children would simply reject as false, and to understand hypotheticals and counterfactuals. This competence applies to both understanding spoken expressions and reading comprehension. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138446692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
White ≠ European (American): Commentary on the American Psychological Association's updated Inclusive Language Guide. 白人≠欧洲人(美国人):对美国心理学协会更新的《包容性语言指南》的评论。
IF 16.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001353
Ursula Moffitt,Linda P Juang
The American Psychological Association (APA) released the second edition of the Inclusive Language Guide in late 2023. One aspect of this guide that was not updated from the previous version was the recommendation for authors to use either "White" or "European (nationality)" when "writing about people of European ancestry." In this commentary, we argue that "white" and "European" or "European American," for instance, are not terms that can or should be used interchangeably. Although most individuals racialized as white have European ancestry, it is generally not their ethnic heritage that is most impactful for their opportunities and experiences, but their perceived and ascribed inclusion in whiteness. Regardless of the research topic, employing the term "European (American)" rather than "white" obscures whiteness and the concomitant role of systemic racism shaping the lives of all individuals, including those racialized as white. Moreover, using the terms "white" and "European (American)" interchangeably implies that only people racialized as white can be European, masking the history and current reality of millions of Europeans of color. Labels that limit being European to those racialized as white perpetuate othering and uphold a hierarchy where being white is the only acceptable embodiment of being European. With racism on the rise in Europe, it is important for researchers to recognize the power of the language we use. We suggest that APA and scholars following APA style consider the implications of these terms and not use them interchangeably, as doing so reinforces inequity across the globe. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
美国心理学会(APA)于 2023 年底发布了第二版《包容性语言指南》。该指南与上一版相比没有更新的一个方面是,建议作者在 "撰写关于欧洲血统的人 "时使用 "白人 "或 "欧洲人(国籍)"。在这篇评论中,我们认为 "白人 "和 "欧洲人 "或 "欧美人 "等词语不能或不应该互换使用。虽然大多数被种族化为白人的人都有欧洲血统,但对他们的机会和经历影响最大的通常不是他们的种族遗产,而是他们对白人身份的认知和归属。无论研究主题如何,使用 "欧洲人(美国人)"而非 "白人 "一词都会掩盖白种人的身份,以及系统性种族主义在塑造所有人(包括那些被种族化为白人的人)生活中所起的相应作用。此外,交替使用 "白人 "和 "欧洲人(美国人)"这两个词意味着只有被种族化为白人的人才能成为欧洲人,从而掩盖了数百万有色人种欧洲人的历史和现实。将 "欧洲人 "仅限于那些被种族化为白人的人的标签使 "他者化 "永久化,并维护了一种等级制度,即白人是 "欧洲人 "唯一可接受的体现。随着种族主义在欧洲的抬头,研究人员必须认识到我们所使用的语言的力量。我们建议 APA 和遵循 APA 风格的学者考虑这些术语的含义,不要交替使用这些术语,因为这样做会强化全球范围内的不平等。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"White ≠ European (American): Commentary on the American Psychological Association's updated Inclusive Language Guide.","authors":"Ursula Moffitt,Linda P Juang","doi":"10.1037/amp0001353","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001353","url":null,"abstract":"The American Psychological Association (APA) released the second edition of the Inclusive Language Guide in late 2023. One aspect of this guide that was not updated from the previous version was the recommendation for authors to use either \"White\" or \"European (nationality)\" when \"writing about people of European ancestry.\" In this commentary, we argue that \"white\" and \"European\" or \"European American,\" for instance, are not terms that can or should be used interchangeably. Although most individuals racialized as white have European ancestry, it is generally not their ethnic heritage that is most impactful for their opportunities and experiences, but their perceived and ascribed inclusion in whiteness. Regardless of the research topic, employing the term \"European (American)\" rather than \"white\" obscures whiteness and the concomitant role of systemic racism shaping the lives of all individuals, including those racialized as white. Moreover, using the terms \"white\" and \"European (American)\" interchangeably implies that only people racialized as white can be European, masking the history and current reality of millions of Europeans of color. Labels that limit being European to those racialized as white perpetuate othering and uphold a hierarchy where being white is the only acceptable embodiment of being European. With racism on the rise in Europe, it is important for researchers to recognize the power of the language we use. We suggest that APA and scholars following APA style consider the implications of these terms and not use them interchangeably, as doing so reinforces inequity across the globe. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142436377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On editor bias and transparency: Reply to Cowan (2024), King (2024), and Thurston and Noor (2024). 关于编辑的偏见和透明度:答复 Cowan (2024)、King (2024) 以及 Thurston 和 Noor (2024)。
IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001316
Donald Sharpe

Cowan's (2024), King's (2024), and Thurston and Noor's (2024) commentaries on my article (Sharpe, 2024) find us in agreement on many matters relating to editor transparency and bias. Where we disagree is in the extent of change required and the rationale behind undertaking that change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Cowan(2024 年)、King(2024 年)、Thurston 和 Noor(2024 年)对我的文章(Sharpe, 2024 年)的评论发现,我们在有关编辑透明度和偏见的许多问题上意见一致。我们的分歧在于所需的变革程度以及进行变革的理由。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"On editor bias and transparency: Reply to Cowan (2024), King (2024), and Thurston and Noor (2024).","authors":"Donald Sharpe","doi":"10.1037/amp0001316","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001316","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cowan's (2024), King's (2024), and Thurston and Noor's (2024) commentaries on my article (Sharpe, 2024) find us in agreement on many matters relating to editor transparency and bias. Where we disagree is in the extent of change required and the rationale behind undertaking that change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142401645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robert (Bob) Anthony Altemeyer (1940-2024). 罗伯特-安东尼-阿尔特迈耶(1940-2024)。
IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-11 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001390
Gordon Hodson

Robert (Bob) Anthony Altemeyer (June 6, 1940-February 7, 2024) was an influential social psychologist who also shaped personality and political psychology. Born in St. Louis, Missouri, Bob was educated at Yale (undergraduate) and Carnegie-Mellon (graduate). Following a 2-year stint at Doane College in Nebraska, he established his career at the University of Manitoba (Winnipeg, Canada) from 1968 to 2008. In 1986, Bob was awarded the prestigious American Association for the Advancement of Science Prize for Behavioral Science Research, largely for his development of the right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) construct. Whereas the authoritarian personality construct developed by Adorno and colleagues in the 1950s was rooted in psychodynamics, Bob drew on social learning principles and conceptualized authoritarianism as both an attitudinal orientation and trait. Not all of Bob's ideas held true, such as the social learning underpinnings that he proposed for RWA. But true to his inquisitive nature, he wrote that he would be excited to learn of RWA's strong heritable components if uncovered (as they later were). An anticonformist to the core, Bob published almost exclusively in books despite the field prioritizing journal articles, typically as sole author and working with few collaborators, and writing about complex ideas with rather informal and unconventional language. His legacy is proof that fighting the odds and remaining authentic, rather than chasing conventions and norms, can leave an indelible mark on science. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

罗伯特-安东尼-阿尔特迈耶(Robert (Bob) Anthony Altemeyer,1940 年 6 月 6 日-2024 年 2 月 7 日)是一位颇具影响力的社会心理学家,他还塑造了人格心理学和政治心理学。鲍勃出生于密苏里州圣路易斯市,曾就读于耶鲁大学(本科)和卡内基-梅隆大学(研究生)。在内布拉斯加州杜恩学院学习两年后,他于 1968 年至 2008 年在马尼托巴大学(加拿大温尼伯)开始了自己的职业生涯。1986 年,鲍勃获得了著名的美国科学促进会行为科学研究奖,这主要归功于他对右翼威权主义(RWA)结构的开发。阿多诺(Adorno)及其同事在 20 世纪 50 年代提出的威权主义人格建构源于心理动力学,而鲍勃则借鉴了社会学习原理,将威权主义概念化为一种态度取向和特质。鲍勃的观点并不都是正确的,比如他为 RWA 提出的社会学习基础。不过,他还是秉承了自己好奇的天性,在信中写道,如果发现 RWA 有很强的遗传因素,他会非常兴奋(后来确实发现了)。鲍勃是一个极度反传统的人,尽管该领域优先考虑期刊论文,但他几乎只在书本上发表文章,而且通常是作为唯一作者,很少与人合作,用相当非正式和非常规的语言来书写复杂的观点。他的遗产证明,与困难作斗争,保持真实,而不是追逐传统和规范,可以在科学界留下不可磨灭的印记。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Robert (Bob) Anthony Altemeyer (1940-2024).","authors":"Gordon Hodson","doi":"10.1037/amp0001390","DOIUrl":"10.1037/amp0001390","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robert (Bob) Anthony Altemeyer (June 6, 1940-February 7, 2024) was an influential social psychologist who also shaped personality and political psychology. Born in St. Louis, Missouri, Bob was educated at Yale (undergraduate) and Carnegie-Mellon (graduate). Following a 2-year stint at Doane College in Nebraska, he established his career at the University of Manitoba (Winnipeg, Canada) from 1968 to 2008. In 1986, Bob was awarded the prestigious American Association for the Advancement of Science Prize for Behavioral Science Research, largely for his development of the right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) construct. Whereas the authoritarian personality construct developed by Adorno and colleagues in the 1950s was rooted in psychodynamics, Bob drew on social learning principles and conceptualized authoritarianism as both an attitudinal orientation and trait. Not all of Bob's ideas held true, such as the social learning underpinnings that he proposed for RWA. But true to his inquisitive nature, he wrote that he would be excited to learn of RWA's strong heritable components if uncovered (as they later were). An anticonformist to the core, Bob published almost exclusively in books despite the field prioritizing journal articles, typically as sole author and working with few collaborators, and writing about complex ideas with rather informal and unconventional language. His legacy is proof that fighting the odds and remaining authentic, rather than chasing conventions and norms, can leave an indelible mark on science. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141591780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An exploration of physics envy with implications for desiderata of psychology theories. 探索物理嫉妒对心理学理论理想的影响。
IF 16.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001416
David Trafimow,Klaus Fiedler
There is a trepidation, anxiety, or intuition, which has persisted for more than a century, that psychology theories are less anchored in fundamental laws than physics theories. Rather than attempt to refute the concern, the present work accepts it and tries out candidate explanations. These pertain to empirical laws, parsimony, scope, reductionism, falsifiability, mathematical operations (multiplication vs. addition), internal coherence, ceteris paribus stipulations, and purposeful omission of relevant factors (idealization). The conceptions underlying these explanations are not strictly independent, but they point to different distinctive features that might account for the unequal status of physics and psychological science and to different means of improving contemporary psychology. Although the available evidence for or against these candidate explanations is scarce and relies mainly on a few telling examples, we conclude that the last of our candidate explanations-reliance on idealized universes-works best and leads to the most insights about what psychology might learn from physics and what research strategies might foster the ideal of theory-driven psychological science in the future. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
一个多世纪以来,一直存在着一种惶恐、焦虑或直觉,即心理学理论不如物理学理论那样扎根于基本规律。本著作没有试图反驳这种担忧,而是接受了它,并尝试了一些候选解释。这些解释涉及经验法则、简约性、范围、还原论、可证伪性、数学运算(乘法与加法)、内部一致性、"比照适用 "规定以及有目的地忽略相关因素(理想化)。这些解释所依据的概念并非严格意义上的独立,但它们指出了可能导致物理学和心理科学地位不平等的不同特点,以及改进当代心理学的不同方法。虽然支持或反对这些候选解释的现有证据很少,而且主要依赖于几个有说服力的例子,但我们得出的结论是,我们的最后一个候选解释--对理想化宇宙的依赖--是最有效的,而且最能让我们了解心理学可以从物理学中学到什么,以及什么样的研究策略可以在未来促进理论驱动型心理科学的理想。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
{"title":"An exploration of physics envy with implications for desiderata of psychology theories.","authors":"David Trafimow,Klaus Fiedler","doi":"10.1037/amp0001416","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001416","url":null,"abstract":"There is a trepidation, anxiety, or intuition, which has persisted for more than a century, that psychology theories are less anchored in fundamental laws than physics theories. Rather than attempt to refute the concern, the present work accepts it and tries out candidate explanations. These pertain to empirical laws, parsimony, scope, reductionism, falsifiability, mathematical operations (multiplication vs. addition), internal coherence, ceteris paribus stipulations, and purposeful omission of relevant factors (idealization). The conceptions underlying these explanations are not strictly independent, but they point to different distinctive features that might account for the unequal status of physics and psychological science and to different means of improving contemporary psychology. Although the available evidence for or against these candidate explanations is scarce and relies mainly on a few telling examples, we conclude that the last of our candidate explanations-reliance on idealized universes-works best and leads to the most insights about what psychology might learn from physics and what research strategies might foster the ideal of theory-driven psychological science in the future. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142324986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Psychologist
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1