首页 > 最新文献

American Psychologist最新文献

英文 中文
A workflow for human-centered machine-assisted hypothesis generation: Commentary on Banker et al. (2024). 以人为本的机器辅助假设生成工作流程:对 Banker 等人(2024 年)的评论。
IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001256
Alejandro Hermida Carrillo, Clemens Stachl, Sanaz Talaifar

Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to revolutionize a key aspect of the scientific process-hypothesis generation. Banker et al. (2024) investigate how GPT-3 and GPT-4 can be used to generate novel hypotheses useful for social psychologists. Although timely, we argue that their approach overlooks the limitations of both humans and LLMs and does not incorporate crucial information on the inquiring researcher's inner world (e.g., values, goals) and outer world (e.g., existing literature) into the hypothesis generation process. Instead, we propose a human-centered workflow (Hope et al., 2023) that recognizes the limitations and capabilities of both the researchers and LLMs. Our workflow features a process of iterative engagement between researchers and GPT-4 that augments-rather than displaces-each researcher's unique role in the hypothesis generation process. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

大型语言模型(LLM)有可能彻底改变科学过程的一个关键方面--假设的产生。Banker 等人(2024 年)研究了如何利用 GPT-3 和 GPT-4 生成对社会心理学家有用的新假设。虽然这种方法很及时,但我们认为,他们的方法忽视了人类和 LLM 的局限性,没有将探究研究者内心世界(如价值观、目标)和外部世界(如现有文献)的关键信息纳入假设生成过程。相反,我们提出了一种以人为本的工作流程(Hope et al.我们的工作流程以研究人员和 GPT-4 之间的迭代参与过程为特色,它增强而非取代了每位研究人员在假设生成过程中的独特角色。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"A workflow for human-centered machine-assisted hypothesis generation: Commentary on Banker et al. (2024).","authors":"Alejandro Hermida Carrillo, Clemens Stachl, Sanaz Talaifar","doi":"10.1037/amp0001256","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to revolutionize a key aspect of the scientific process-hypothesis generation. Banker et al. (2024) investigate how GPT-3 and GPT-4 can be used to generate novel hypotheses useful for social psychologists. Although timely, we argue that their approach overlooks the limitations of both humans and LLMs and does not incorporate crucial information on the inquiring researcher's inner world (e.g., values, goals) and outer world (e.g., existing literature) into the hypothesis generation process. Instead, we propose a human-centered workflow (Hope et al., 2023) that recognizes the limitations and capabilities of both the researchers and LLMs. Our workflow features a process of iterative engagement between researchers and GPT-4 that augments-rather than displaces-each researcher's unique role in the hypothesis generation process. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Machines, psychology, and hypothesis generation: Commentary on Banker et al. (2024). 机器、心理学和假设生成:对 Banker 等人(2024 年)的评论。
IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001258
Jonah Berger

Advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence are revolutionizing many aspects of human life, and as Banker et al. (2024) illustrate, generative artificial intelligence may also facilitate hypothesis generation in academic research. But while it is easy to imagine this idea generating some alarm (i.e., hypothesis generation may seem like the most creative, human part of research), their work actually raises an even more important question: Why should we believe that the current (human) method of hypothesis generation is somehow ideal in the first place? This article discusses the implications of their work and outlines how automated content analysis and machine learning can also help researchers determine what hypotheses deserve attention in the first place. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

机器学习和人工智能的进步正在彻底改变人类生活的许多方面,正如Banker等人(2024年)所言,生成式人工智能也可以促进学术研究中的假设生成。不过,尽管很容易想象这一想法会引起一些恐慌(也就是说,假设生成似乎是研究中最具创造性、最人性化的部分),但他们的工作实际上提出了一个更重要的问题:我们为什么要相信目前(人类)提出假设的方法是最理想的?本文讨论了他们工作的意义,并概述了自动内容分析和机器学习如何帮助研究人员确定哪些假设首先值得关注。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Machines, psychology, and hypothesis generation: Commentary on Banker et al. (2024).","authors":"Jonah Berger","doi":"10.1037/amp0001258","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001258","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence are revolutionizing many aspects of human life, and as Banker et al. (2024) illustrate, generative artificial intelligence may also facilitate hypothesis generation in academic research. But while it is easy to imagine this idea generating some alarm (i.e., hypothesis generation may seem like the most creative, human part of research), their work actually raises an even more important question: Why should we believe that the current (human) method of hypothesis generation is somehow ideal in the first place? This article discusses the implications of their work and outlines how automated content analysis and machine learning can also help researchers determine what hypotheses deserve attention in the first place. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Machine-assisted social psychology hypothesis generation. 机器辅助社会心理学假设生成。
IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001222
Sachin Banker, Promothesh Chatterjee, Himanshu Mishra, Arul Mishra

Social psychology research projects begin with generating a testable idea that relies heavily on a researcher's ability to assimilate, recall, and accurately process available research findings. However, an exponential increase in new research findings is making the task of synthesizing ideas across the multitude of topics challenging, which could result in important overlooked research connections. In this research, we leverage the fact that social psychology research is based on verbal models and employ large natural language models to generate hypotheses that can aid social psychology researchers in developing new research hypotheses. We adopted two methodological approaches. In the first approach, we fine-tuned the third-generation generative pre-trained transformer (GPT-3) language model on thousands of abstracts published in more than 50 social psychology journals in the past 55 years as well as on preprint repositories (PsyArXiv). Social psychology experts rated model- and human-generated hypotheses similarly on the dimensions of clarity, originality, and impact. In the second approach, without fine-tuning, we generated hypotheses using GPT-4 and found that social psychology experts rated these generated hypotheses as higher in quality than human-generated hypotheses on dimensions of clarity, originality, impact, plausibility, and relevance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

社会心理学研究项目始于产生一个可检验的想法,这在很大程度上依赖于研究人员吸收、回忆和准确处理现有研究成果的能力。然而,新研究成果的指数级增长使得在众多主题中综合各种观点的任务变得极具挑战性,这可能会导致重要的研究联系被忽视。在这项研究中,我们利用社会心理学研究基于语言模型这一事实,采用大型自然语言模型来生成假设,从而帮助社会心理学研究人员开发新的研究假设。我们采用了两种方法论。在第一种方法中,我们在过去 55 年中 50 多种社会心理学期刊以及预印本库(PsyArXiv)中发表的数千篇摘要上对第三代生成预训练转换器(GPT-3)语言模型进行了微调。社会心理学专家对模型和人工生成的假设在清晰度、原创性和影响力方面的评分相似。第二种方法是不进行微调,我们使用 GPT-4 生成假设,结果发现社会心理学专家在清晰度、原创性、影响力、合理性和相关性等方面对这些生成的假设的质量评分均高于人工生成的假设。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Machine-assisted social psychology hypothesis generation.","authors":"Sachin Banker, Promothesh Chatterjee, Himanshu Mishra, Arul Mishra","doi":"10.1037/amp0001222","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001222","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social psychology research projects begin with generating a testable idea that relies heavily on a researcher's ability to assimilate, recall, and accurately process available research findings. However, an exponential increase in new research findings is making the task of synthesizing ideas across the multitude of topics challenging, which could result in important overlooked research connections. In this research, we leverage the fact that social psychology research is based on verbal models and employ large natural language models to generate hypotheses that can aid social psychology researchers in developing new research hypotheses. We adopted two methodological approaches. In the first approach, we fine-tuned the third-generation generative pre-trained transformer (GPT-3) language model on thousands of abstracts published in more than 50 social psychology journals in the past 55 years as well as on preprint repositories (PsyArXiv). Social psychology experts rated model- and human-generated hypotheses similarly on the dimensions of clarity, originality, and impact. In the second approach, without fine-tuning, we generated hypotheses using GPT-4 and found that social psychology experts rated these generated hypotheses as higher in quality than human-generated hypotheses on dimensions of clarity, originality, impact, plausibility, and relevance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Step-by-step to more creativity: The number of steps in everyday life is related to creative ideation performance. 一步一步提高创造力:日常生活中的步数与创造性思维表现有关。
IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-16 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001232
Christian Rominger, Andreas Fink, Bernhard Weber, Mathias Benedek, Corinna M Perchtold-Stefan, Andreas R Schwerdtfeger

Research indicated an association of acute and chronic physical activity with creative ideation performance. However, no study to date applied ecologically valid ambulatory methods with the potential to generalize these positive relationships to everyday life contexts. This study assessed acute and chronic physical activity (i.e., number of steps assessed via acceleration sensors) as well as creative ideation performance (in the verbal and figural domain) with an ecological momentary assessment approach in a sample of 157 young adults. We found that both single bouts of walking and walking regularly were associated with more original verbal ideas. Positive affect did not mediate this association; however, for figural creativity, the indirect path of acute physical activity via acute positive affect was significant. Although the relationship between walking and creativity seems to be domain-specific, the study findings suggest that the positive effects of physical activity on creativity transfer to everyday life contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

研究表明,急性和慢性体育活动与创造性思维表现有关。然而,迄今为止还没有研究应用生态学上有效的动态方法,有可能将这些积极的关系推广到日常生活环境中。本研究采用生态瞬时评估方法评估了157名年轻人的急性和慢性身体活动(即通过加速度传感器评估的步数)以及创造性思维表现(在语言和图形领域)。我们发现,无论是单次散步还是定期散步,都与更有创意的语言想法有关。积极情绪并未介导这种关联;然而,对于图形创造力,急性身体活动通过急性积极影响的间接路径是显著的。虽然散步和创造力之间的关系似乎是特定领域的,但研究结果表明,体育活动对创造力的积极影响可以转移到日常生活环境中。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Step-by-step to more creativity: The number of steps in everyday life is related to creative ideation performance.","authors":"Christian Rominger, Andreas Fink, Bernhard Weber, Mathias Benedek, Corinna M Perchtold-Stefan, Andreas R Schwerdtfeger","doi":"10.1037/amp0001232","DOIUrl":"10.1037/amp0001232","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research indicated an association of acute and chronic physical activity with creative ideation performance. However, no study to date applied ecologically valid ambulatory methods with the potential to generalize these positive relationships to everyday life contexts. This study assessed acute and chronic physical activity (i.e., number of steps assessed via acceleration sensors) as well as creative ideation performance (in the verbal and figural domain) with an ecological momentary assessment approach in a sample of 157 young adults. We found that both single bouts of walking and walking regularly were associated with more original verbal ideas. Positive affect did not mediate this association; however, for figural creativity, the indirect path of acute physical activity via acute positive affect was significant. Although the relationship between walking and creativity seems to be domain-specific, the study findings suggest that the positive effects of physical activity on creativity transfer to everyday life contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136399849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The future of large language models in social science research: Reply to Berger (2024) and Carrillo et al. (2024). 社会科学研究中大型语言模型的未来:回复 Berger (2024) 和 Carrillo 等人 (2024)。
IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001287
Sachin Banker, Promothesh Chatterjee, Himanshu Mishra, Arul Mishra

In their commentaries, Berger (2024) and Carrillo et al. (2024) raise several thoughtful questions regarding machine-assisted hypothesis generation in the social sciences. We discuss their ideas and build upon them. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Berger (2024) 和 Carrillo 等人 (2024) 在他们的评论中就社会科学中的机器辅助假设生成提出了几个深思熟虑的问题。我们将讨论他们的观点,并在此基础上加以改进。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"The future of large language models in social science research: Reply to Berger (2024) and Carrillo et al. (2024).","authors":"Sachin Banker, Promothesh Chatterjee, Himanshu Mishra, Arul Mishra","doi":"10.1037/amp0001287","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001287","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In their commentaries, Berger (2024) and Carrillo et al. (2024) raise several thoughtful questions regarding machine-assisted hypothesis generation in the social sciences. We discuss their ideas and build upon them. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142298912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evidence-based practice in psychology: Context, guidelines, and action. 心理学中的循证实践:背景、指导和行动。
IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-20 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001253
Timothy P Melchert, Raquel W Halfond, Nayla R Hamdi, Lynn F Bufka, Steven D Hollon, Michael J Cuttler

A science-based approach to understanding health and disease emerged gradually over the past two centuries, while the modern evidence-based approach to health care emerged only about a half-century ago. The evidence-based approach to practice in health service psychology (HSP) gained significant traction after the American Psychological Association (APA) adopted it as policy in 2005, and in 2021, APA approved the first comprehensive set of guidelines for practicing HSP in an evidence-based manner. Several authors of this 2021 set of guidelines along with an additional subject matter expert wrote the current article. This article outlines the development of evidence-based practice in psychology, discusses the strengths and weaknesses of each of the three components of evidence-based practice (i.e., best available research, clinical expertise, and patient characteristics, culture, and preferences), and highlights the complexity involved in integrating related considerations during clinical decision making. The article then discusses strategies for the systematic application of this approach in HSP to improve the effectiveness of behavioral health care and strengthen population health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

以科学为基础的理解健康和疾病的方法在过去两个世纪中逐渐出现,而以证据为基础的现代卫生保健方法仅在大约半个世纪前出现。2005年,美国心理学会(APA)将以证据为基础的卫生服务心理学(HSP)实践方法作为一项政策,并于2021年批准了第一套以证据为基础的卫生服务心理学实践指南。这篇2021年指南的几位作者以及另一位主题专家撰写了这篇文章。本文概述了心理学中循证实践的发展,讨论了循证实践的三个组成部分(即最佳可用研究、临床专业知识、患者特征、文化和偏好)的优缺点,并强调了在临床决策过程中整合相关考虑因素所涉及的复杂性。然后,本文讨论了在HSP中系统应用该方法的策略,以提高行为卫生保健的有效性,加强人群健康。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Evidence-based practice in psychology: Context, guidelines, and action.","authors":"Timothy P Melchert, Raquel W Halfond, Nayla R Hamdi, Lynn F Bufka, Steven D Hollon, Michael J Cuttler","doi":"10.1037/amp0001253","DOIUrl":"10.1037/amp0001253","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A science-based approach to understanding health and disease emerged gradually over the past two centuries, while the modern evidence-based approach to health care emerged only about a half-century ago. The evidence-based approach to practice in health service psychology (HSP) gained significant traction after the American Psychological Association (APA) adopted it as policy in 2005, and in 2021, APA approved the first comprehensive set of guidelines for practicing HSP in an evidence-based manner. Several authors of this 2021 set of guidelines along with an additional subject matter expert wrote the current article. This article outlines the development of evidence-based practice in psychology, discusses the strengths and weaknesses of each of the three components of evidence-based practice (i.e., best available research, clinical expertise, and patient characteristics, culture, and preferences), and highlights the complexity involved in integrating related considerations during clinical decision making. The article then discusses strategies for the systematic application of this approach in HSP to improve the effectiveness of behavioral health care and strengthen population health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138048216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Purpose in life: A resolution on the definition, conceptual model, and optimal measurement. 人生的目的:关于定义、概念模型和最佳衡量的决议。
IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-20 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001223
Todd B Kashdan, Fallon R Goodman, Patrick E McKnight, Bradley Brown, Ruba Rum

Theoretically, purpose serves as a basic dimension of healthy psychological functioning and an important protective factor from psychopathology. Theory alone, however, is insufficient to answer critical questions about human behavior and functioning; we require empirical evidence that explores the parameters of purpose with respect to measurement, prediction, and modification. Here, we provide empirically supported insights about how purpose can operate as a beneficial outcome (e.g., marker of well-being), a predictor or mechanism that accounts for benefits that a person derives (such as from an intervention), or a moderator that offers insight into when benefits arise. Advancing the study of purpose requires careful consideration of how purpose is conceptualized, manipulated, and measured across the lifespan. Our aim is to help scientists understand, specify, and conduct high-quality studies of purpose in life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

从理论上讲,目的是健康心理功能的一个基本维度,也是心理病理学的一个重要保护因素。然而,理论本身不足以回答有关人类行为和功能的关键问题;我们需要经验证据来探索与测量、预测和修改相关的目的参数。在这里,我们提供了经验支持的见解,关于目的如何作为一个有益的结果(例如,幸福的标志),一个预测者或机制,说明一个人获得的利益(例如,从干预中),或一个调解员,提供洞察何时出现利益。推进对目标的研究需要仔细考虑目标是如何在整个生命周期中被概念化、操纵和衡量的。我们的目标是帮助科学家理解、明确和开展高质量的生活目的研究。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Purpose in life: A resolution on the definition, conceptual model, and optimal measurement.","authors":"Todd B Kashdan, Fallon R Goodman, Patrick E McKnight, Bradley Brown, Ruba Rum","doi":"10.1037/amp0001223","DOIUrl":"10.1037/amp0001223","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Theoretically, purpose serves as a basic dimension of healthy psychological functioning and an important protective factor from psychopathology. Theory alone, however, is insufficient to answer critical questions about human behavior and functioning; we require empirical evidence that explores the parameters of purpose with respect to measurement, prediction, and modification. Here, we provide empirically supported insights about how purpose can operate as a beneficial outcome (e.g., marker of well-being), a predictor or mechanism that accounts for benefits that a person derives (such as from an intervention), or a moderator that offers insight into when benefits arise. Advancing the study of purpose requires careful consideration of how purpose is conceptualized, manipulated, and measured across the lifespan. Our aim is to help scientists understand, specify, and conduct high-quality studies of purpose in life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138048217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adversarial collaboration: An undervalued approach in behavioral science. 对抗性合作:行为科学中一种被低估的方法。
IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001391
Stephen J Ceci, Cory J Clark, Lee Jussim, Wendy M Williams

Open Science initiatives such as preregistration, publicly available procedures and data, and power analyses have rightly been lauded for increasing the reliability of findings. However, a potentially equally important initiative-aimed at increasing the validity of science-has largely been ignored. Adversarial collaborations (ACs) refer to team science in which members are chosen to represent diverse (and even contradictory) perspectives and hypotheses, with or without a neutral team member to referee disputes. Here, we provide background about ACs and argue that they are effective, essential, and underutilized. We explain how and why ACs can enhance both the reliability and validity of science and why their benefit extends beyond the realm of team science to include venues such as fact-checking, wisdom of crowds, journal reviewing, and sequential editing. Improving scientific validity would increase the efficacy of policy and interventions stemming from behavioral science research, and over time, it could help salvage the reputation of our discipline because its products would be perceived as resulting from a serious, open-minded consideration of diverse views. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

预注册、公开程序和数据以及功率分析等开放科学举措因其提高了研究结果的可靠性而理所当然地受到了赞誉。然而,一项潜在的旨在提高科学有效性的同样重要的举措却在很大程度上被忽视了。对抗性合作(ACs)指的是团队科学,在这种合作中,团队成员被选来代表不同的(甚至是相互矛盾的)观点和假设,无论是否有中立的团队成员来裁判争议。在此,我们将介绍合作研究的背景,并指出合作研究是有效的、必不可少的,但却未得到充分利用。我们解释了交流如何以及为什么能够提高科学的可靠性和有效性,以及为什么交流的益处超出了团队科学的范畴,还包括事实核查、群众智慧、期刊审阅和顺序编辑等领域。提高科学的有效性将提高源于行为科学研究的政策和干预措施的有效性,而且随着时间的推移,这将有助于挽回我们学科的声誉,因为其产品将被视为是认真、虚心地考虑不同观点的结果。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
{"title":"Adversarial collaboration: An undervalued approach in behavioral science.","authors":"Stephen J Ceci, Cory J Clark, Lee Jussim, Wendy M Williams","doi":"10.1037/amp0001391","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001391","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Open Science initiatives such as preregistration, publicly available procedures and data, and power analyses have rightly been lauded for increasing the <i>reliability</i> of findings. However, a potentially equally important initiative-aimed at increasing the <i>validity</i> of science-has largely been ignored. Adversarial collaborations (ACs) refer to team science in which members are chosen to represent diverse (and even contradictory) perspectives and hypotheses, with or without a neutral team member to referee disputes. Here, we provide background about ACs and argue that they are effective, essential, and underutilized. We explain how and why ACs can enhance both the reliability and validity of science and why their benefit extends beyond the realm of team science to include venues such as fact-checking, wisdom of crowds, journal reviewing, and sequential editing. Improving scientific validity would increase the efficacy of policy and interventions stemming from behavioral science research, and over time, it could help salvage the reputation of our discipline because its products would be perceived as resulting from a serious, open-minded consideration of diverse views. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141989207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Broadening the evidentiary basis for clinical practice guidelines: Recommendations from qualitative psychotherapy researchers. 拓宽临床实践指南的证据基础:定性心理疗法研究人员的建议。
IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001363
Heidi M Levitt, Andreas Hamburger, Clara E Hill, John McLeod, Antonio Pascual-Leone, Ladislav Timulak, Michael B Buchholz, Joerg Frommer, Jairo Fuertes, Shigeru Iwakabe, Claudio Martínez, Zenobia Morrill, Sarah Knox, Phil Langer, J Christopher Muran, Hanne Weie Oddli, Tomáš Řiháček, Alemka Tomicic, Rivka Tuval-Mashiach

To improve the provision of psychotherapy, many countries have now established clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of specific disorders and mental health concerns. These guidelines have typically been based on evidence from meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials with minimal consideration of findings from qualitative research designs. This said, there has been growing interest in incorporating qualitative research in guideline development processes from both stakeholders and guideline development bodies. In this international collaboration, 19 qualitative psychotherapy researchers from 10 countries articulated the benefits of including qualitative findings within the guideline development process and generated recommendations for guideline developers. The underlying question of this report was "Why and how should qualitative research be used in efforts to develop guidance for psychotherapy practice?" The advantages of reviewing qualitative findings included the ability to identify treatment patterns at the level of in-session dynamics, cultural contexts, interpersonal relationships, and internal experiences, thereby creating guidance that is responsive to clients' needs in the moment-to-moment therapy process. Recommendations are offered at the systemic level (e.g., guideline formation processes, methods of education, research funding priorities). Also, methodological advice is offered for guideline developers when selecting to incorporate qualitative research in the implementation of an expanded guideline development process. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

为了更好地提供心理治疗,许多国家现已制定了治疗特定疾病和心理健康问题的临床实践指南。这些指南通常以随机临床试验的元分析证据为基础,很少考虑定性研究设计的结果。尽管如此,利益相关者和指南制定机构对将定性研究纳入指南制定过程的兴趣与日俱增。在这次国际合作中,来自 10 个国家的 19 位定性心理治疗研究人员阐述了将定性研究结果纳入指南制定过程的益处,并为指南制定者提出了建议。这份报告的基本问题是:"在制定心理治疗实践指南的过程中,为什么以及如何使用定性研究?回顾定性研究结果的优势包括:能够在会话动态、文化背景、人际关系和内在体验的层面上识别治疗模式,从而制定出能够在治疗过程中时刻满足客户需求的指南。在系统层面(如指南制定过程、教育方法、研究资金优先次序)提出建议。此外,还为指南制定者在选择将定性研究纳入扩大的指南制定过程时提供了方法建议。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Broadening the evidentiary basis for clinical practice guidelines: Recommendations from qualitative psychotherapy researchers.","authors":"Heidi M Levitt, Andreas Hamburger, Clara E Hill, John McLeod, Antonio Pascual-Leone, Ladislav Timulak, Michael B Buchholz, Joerg Frommer, Jairo Fuertes, Shigeru Iwakabe, Claudio Martínez, Zenobia Morrill, Sarah Knox, Phil Langer, J Christopher Muran, Hanne Weie Oddli, Tomáš Řiháček, Alemka Tomicic, Rivka Tuval-Mashiach","doi":"10.1037/amp0001363","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001363","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To improve the provision of psychotherapy, many countries have now established clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of specific disorders and mental health concerns. These guidelines have typically been based on evidence from meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials with minimal consideration of findings from qualitative research designs. This said, there has been growing interest in incorporating qualitative research in guideline development processes from both stakeholders and guideline development bodies. In this international collaboration, 19 qualitative psychotherapy researchers from 10 countries articulated the benefits of including qualitative findings within the guideline development process and generated recommendations for guideline developers. The underlying question of this report was \"Why and how should qualitative research be used in efforts to develop guidance for psychotherapy practice?\" The advantages of reviewing qualitative findings included the ability to identify treatment patterns at the level of in-session dynamics, cultural contexts, interpersonal relationships, and internal experiences, thereby creating guidance that is responsive to clients' needs in the moment-to-moment therapy process. Recommendations are offered at the systemic level (e.g., guideline formation processes, methods of education, research funding priorities). Also, methodological advice is offered for guideline developers when selecting to incorporate qualitative research in the implementation of an expanded guideline development process. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141972041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Donald N. Bersoff (1939-2024). 唐纳德-N-贝尔索夫(1939-2024)。
IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI: 10.1037/amp0001401
Kirk Heilbrun, David DeMatteo, Naomi E Goldstein

This article memorializes Donald N. Bersoff (1939-2024), who provided a foundational influence on the development of American law-psychology and served as the 2013 president of the American Psychological Association (APA). Don had a long and meaningful career as a psychologist and a lawyer. One of Don's greatest interests was in training psychologist-lawyers who would make meaningful contributions to either field. After a decade as APA general counsel, he was recruited to direct the law-psychology program at Hahnemann University and Villanova School of Law. He was elected as the president of the APA in 2013; two of the major themes of his presidency involved encouraging service to military veterans and their families, and promoting diversity within the ranks of psychology to better serve an increasingly diverse population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

本文纪念唐纳德-贝尔索夫(Donald N. Bersoff,1939-2024 年),他对美国法律心理学的发展产生了奠基性的影响,并曾担任美国心理学会 (APA) 2013 年主席。作为一名心理学家和律师,唐的职业生涯漫长而有意义。唐最大的兴趣之一是培养能在这两个领域做出有意义贡献的心理学家-律师。在担任美国心理学会总顾问十年后,他受聘指导哈内曼大学和维拉诺瓦法学院的法律心理学课程。他于 2013 年当选为美国心理学会主席;他担任主席期间的两大主题是鼓励为退伍军人及其家人提供服务,以及促进心理学队伍的多元化,以便更好地为日益多元化的人群服务。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
{"title":"Donald N. Bersoff (1939-2024).","authors":"Kirk Heilbrun, David DeMatteo, Naomi E Goldstein","doi":"10.1037/amp0001401","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001401","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article memorializes Donald N. Bersoff (1939-2024), who provided a foundational influence on the development of American law-psychology and served as the 2013 president of the American Psychological Association (APA). Don had a long and meaningful career as a psychologist and a lawyer. One of Don's greatest interests was in training psychologist-lawyers who would make meaningful contributions to either field. After a decade as APA general counsel, he was recruited to direct the law-psychology program at Hahnemann University and Villanova School of Law. He was elected as the president of the APA in 2013; two of the major themes of his presidency involved encouraging service to military veterans and their families, and promoting diversity within the ranks of psychology to better serve an increasingly diverse population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141890588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Psychologist
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1