Computers in Human Behavior最新文献_第2页

Exploring protective and risk factors for a positive sexting experience among young adults – insights from the SEX-THINK! Project 探索年轻人积极的性短信体验的保护和风险因素-来自性思考！项目

IF 8.9 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

Computers in Human Behavior

Pub Date : 2025-12-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2025.108901

Barbara Agueli , Immacolata Di Napoli , Marcella Autiero , Nicole Bellanca , Alice Lucarini

Nowadays sexuality is increasingly expressed through digital channels, with sexting being a widespread practice carrying complex relational and psychological implications. This work presents the SEX-THINK! project that, employing a mixed-method approach, explored this phenomenon among young Italians adults (18–30), examining its meanings, risks, and potentialities. In Study 1 (qualitative, N = 81), we conducted focus groups and applied grounded theory to inductively explore participants’ narratives and identify factors that can shape the quality of the sexting experiences. Results revealed ambivalent representations of sexting, which is not a negative experience per se, but rather can be shaped by a series of potentially protective and risk factors. Building on the insights from Study 1, Study 2 (quantitative, N = 584) tested a model that systematically considers both protective and risk factors associated with a positive sexting experience. Results suggest greater importance of protective factors, particularly related to relationship quality and online trust. Moreover, we found that female sexual objectification was significantly and positively associated with greater perceived quality of the sexting experience among men, but not women. This project offers both theoretical and practical contributions to digital sexuality education, emphasizing the importance of trust and mutual respect in online interactions.

如今，性行为越来越多地通过数字渠道表达，性短信是一种普遍的做法，带有复杂的关系和心理含义。这个作品展示了性——思考！该项目采用混合方法探讨了意大利年轻人（18-30岁）的这一现象，研究了其含义、风险和潜力。在研究1（定性，N = 81）中，我们进行了焦点小组讨论，并应用扎根理论来归纳探索参与者的叙述，并确定可以塑造性短信体验质量的因素。结果揭示了对性短信的矛盾表征，这本身并不是一种消极的体验，而是由一系列潜在的保护和风险因素塑造的。在研究1的基础上，研究2（定量，N = 584）测试了一个模型，该模型系统地考虑了与积极的性短信体验相关的保护因素和风险因素。结果表明，保护因素更为重要，尤其是与关系质量和在线信任相关的因素。此外，我们发现女性的性物化与男性对性短信体验的感知质量显著正相关，而女性则不然。该项目为数字化性教育提供了理论和实践上的贡献，强调了在线互动中信任和相互尊重的重要性。

{"title":"Exploring protective and risk factors for a positive sexting experience among young adults – insights from the SEX-THINK! Project","authors":"Barbara Agueli , Immacolata Di Napoli , Marcella Autiero , Nicole Bellanca , Alice Lucarini","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108901","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108901","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nowadays sexuality is increasingly expressed through digital channels, with sexting being a widespread practice carrying complex relational and psychological implications. This work presents the SEX-THINK! project that, employing a mixed-method approach, explored this phenomenon among young Italians adults (18–30), examining its meanings, risks, and potentialities. In Study 1 (qualitative, <em>N</em> = 81), we conducted focus groups and applied grounded theory to inductively explore participants’ narratives and identify factors that can shape the quality of the sexting experiences. Results revealed ambivalent representations of sexting, which is not a negative experience per se, but rather can be shaped by a series of potentially protective and risk factors. Building on the insights from Study 1, Study 2 (quantitative, <em>N</em> = 584) tested a model that systematically considers both protective and risk factors associated with a positive sexting experience. Results suggest greater importance of protective factors, particularly related to relationship quality and online trust. Moreover, we found that female sexual objectification was significantly and positively associated with greater perceived quality of the sexting experience among men, but not women. This project offers both theoretical and practical contributions to digital sexuality education, emphasizing the importance of trust and mutual respect in online interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 108901"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145884554","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Perceptions of sexualized deepfake abuse across three nations: An exploration of how victim gender and race shape attitudes towards deepfake abuse in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia 三个国家对性别化的深度假货滥用的看法：探讨受害者的性别和种族如何影响美国、英国和澳大利亚对深度假货滥用的态度

IF 8.9 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

Computers in Human Behavior

Pub Date : 2025-12-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2025.108899

Asia A. Eaton , Adrian J. Scott , Asher Flynn , Anastasia Powell

Despite a growing body of literature on various forms of image-based sexual abuse, little is known about public perceptions of sexualized deepfake abuse. In this three-nation, pre-registered experimental study with a sample of 1,925 adults from the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK), and Australia, we manipulated the race and gender of victims of sexualized deepfake abuse to examine perceptions of blame and harm. Specifically, we exposed participants to pre-tested, ethically digitally-generated, full-frontal nude images of Black, East Asian, and White women and men in a between participants design, and assessed the extent to which the victim and perpetrator were blamed for the creation and sharing of the image, and the extent to which the victim was seen as harmed by the creation and sharing of the image. The analyses revealed that: (1) female victims were perceived to experience more harm than male victims from both the creation and sharing of sexualized deepfakes; (2) male participants attributed less responsibility to perpetrators and less harm to victims for the creation and sharing of deepfakes; and (3) US participants were higher in attributions of victim blame and lower in perpetrator responsibility and victim harm than UK and Australian participants, for both the creation and sharing of sexualized deepfakes. Finally, (4) US participants demonstrated gendered racism in attributions of harm, perceiving less harm to the Black female victim than the white and Asian female victims for image creation. One implication of these findings is that intersectional training and education on IBSA may be useful for bystanders and service providers.

尽管关于各种形式的基于图像的性虐待的文献越来越多，但公众对深度性侵的看法却知之甚少。在这项预先注册的三国实验研究中，我们对1925名来自美国、英国和澳大利亚的成年人进行了抽样调查。我们对深度性侵受害者的种族和性别进行了操纵，以检验他们对指责和伤害的看法。具体来说，我们将参与者暴露在预先测试的、道德上数字化生成的、黑人、东亚和白人女性和男性的正面裸体图像中，并评估受害者和肇事者因图像的创作和分享而受到指责的程度，以及受害者因图像的创作和分享而被视为受到伤害的程度。分析结果表明：(1)女性受害者比男性受害者在性化深度假照片的创作和分享中受到的伤害更大；(2)男性参与者认为，在深度造假的制造和分享过程中，作案者的责任更小，受害者的伤害更小；(3)与英国和澳大利亚的参与者相比，美国参与者更倾向于将受害者归咎于他人，而将犯罪者的责任和受害者的伤害归咎于他人，无论是在制作和分享色情深度假照片方面。最后，(4)美国参与者在伤害归因上表现出性别种族主义，黑人女性受害者比白人和亚洲女性受害者在形象创造上感受到的伤害要小。这些发现的一个含义是，IBSA的交叉培训和教育可能对旁观者和服务提供者有用。

{"title":"Perceptions of sexualized deepfake abuse across three nations: An exploration of how victim gender and race shape attitudes towards deepfake abuse in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia","authors":"Asia A. Eaton , Adrian J. Scott , Asher Flynn , Anastasia Powell","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108899","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108899","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite a growing body of literature on various forms of image-based sexual abuse, little is known about public perceptions of sexualized deepfake abuse. In this three-nation, pre-registered experimental study with a sample of 1,925 adults from the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK), and Australia, we manipulated the race and gender of victims of sexualized deepfake abuse to examine perceptions of blame and harm. Specifically, we exposed participants to pre-tested, ethically digitally-generated, full-frontal nude images of Black, East Asian, and White women and men in a between participants design, and assessed the extent to which the victim and perpetrator were blamed for the creation and sharing of the image, and the extent to which the victim was seen as harmed by the creation and sharing of the image. The analyses revealed that: (1) female victims were perceived to experience more harm than male victims from both the creation and sharing of sexualized deepfakes; (2) male participants attributed less responsibility to perpetrators and less harm to victims for the creation and sharing of deepfakes; and (3) US participants were higher in attributions of victim blame and lower in perpetrator responsibility and victim harm than UK and Australian participants, for both the creation and sharing of sexualized deepfakes. Finally, (4) US participants demonstrated gendered racism in attributions of harm, perceiving less harm to the Black female victim than the white and Asian female victims for image creation. One implication of these findings is that intersectional training and education on IBSA may be useful for bystanders and service providers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 108899"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145884557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Bridging or broadening Gaps? AI-Assisted professional writing among native and non-native English Writers 缩小还是扩大差距？人工智能辅助专业写作的母语和非母语的英语作家

IF 8.9 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

Computers in Human Behavior

Pub Date : 2025-12-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2025.108897

Inyoung Shin , Hyesun Choung , Mina Choi

This study examines how AI influences existing differences in professional writing between native and non-native English writers (NEWs and NNEWs) in the United States, reflecting individuals’ task-related proficiency and language-based social positioning. We compare how these two groups integrate AI-generated content into their writing and include writing self-efficacy as a moderator to examine whether perceived task proficiency shapes the differences in AI use between the two groups. We also test an underlying social-psychological mechanism by examining the mediating role of perceived superiority: the extent to which participants judged the AI-generated text as better than their own writing. In an online experiment, 327 NEWs and NNEWs were recruited to write a job application cover letter for a hypothetical scenario. Participants were randomly assigned to receive AI-generated content written at either a simple or advanced lexical level and were asked to revise their letter as they chose, potentially incorporating the AI-generated content. Using natural language processing techniques, we measured the extent to which participants integrated AI-generated content. Findings show that NNEWs favored simpler content, while NEWs tended to incorporate advanced content. This difference was pronounced among those with lower writing self-efficacy. However, the perceived superiority of AI-generated text did not explain this pattern. These findings show that while AI can support lower-skilled groups in specific tasks, sociolinguistic gaps still remain even with AI-assistance. We conclude by calling for AI training frameworks that scaffold learning to address both proficiency gaps and social constraints.

本研究考察了人工智能如何影响美国母语和非母语英语作家（NEWs和NNEWs）在专业写作方面存在的差异，反映了个人的任务相关熟练程度和基于语言的社会定位。我们比较了这两组人如何将人工智能生成的内容整合到他们的写作中，并将写作自我效能作为调节因素，以检验感知任务熟练程度是否影响了两组人在人工智能使用方面的差异。我们还通过检查感知优势的中介作用来测试潜在的社会心理机制：参与者判断人工智能生成的文本比他们自己写的更好的程度。在一项在线实验中，327家新闻和NNEWs被招募来为一个假设的场景写求职信。参与者被随机分配接收人工智能生成的内容，这些内容要么是简单的，要么是高级的词汇水平，并被要求随意修改他们的信件，可能会融入人工智能生成的内容。使用自然语言处理技术，我们测量了参与者整合人工智能生成内容的程度。调查结果显示，NNEWs更喜欢简单的内容，而NEWs则倾向于包含高级内容。这种差异在写作自我效能较低的人身上表现得尤为明显。然而，人工智能生成文本的感知优势并不能解释这种模式。这些发现表明，虽然人工智能可以在特定任务中支持低技能群体，但即使有人工智能的帮助，社会语言差距仍然存在。最后，我们呼吁建立人工智能培训框架，支持学习，以解决熟练程度差距和社会约束。

{"title":"Bridging or broadening Gaps? AI-Assisted professional writing among native and non-native English Writers","authors":"Inyoung Shin , Hyesun Choung , Mina Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108897","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108897","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how AI influences existing differences in professional writing between native and non-native English writers (NEWs and NNEWs) in the United States, reflecting individuals’ task-related proficiency and language-based social positioning. We compare how these two groups integrate AI-generated content into their writing and include writing self-efficacy as a moderator to examine whether perceived task proficiency shapes the differences in AI use between the two groups. We also test an underlying social-psychological mechanism by examining the mediating role of perceived superiority: the extent to which participants judged the AI-generated text as better than their own writing. In an online experiment, 327 NEWs and NNEWs were recruited to write a job application cover letter for a hypothetical scenario. Participants were randomly assigned to receive AI-generated content written at either a simple or advanced lexical level and were asked to revise their letter as they chose, potentially incorporating the AI-generated content. Using natural language processing techniques, we measured the extent to which participants integrated AI-generated content. Findings show that NNEWs favored simpler content, while NEWs tended to incorporate advanced content. This difference was pronounced among those with lower writing self-efficacy. However, the perceived superiority of AI-generated text did not explain this pattern. These findings show that while AI can support lower-skilled groups in specific tasks, sociolinguistic gaps still remain even with AI-assistance. We conclude by calling for AI training frameworks that scaffold learning to address both proficiency gaps and social constraints.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 108897"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145884555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Choose to think: Nudging towards privacy informed decisions at the app download stage 选择思考：在应用下载阶段对隐私做出明智的决定

IF 8.9 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

Computers in Human Behavior

Pub Date : 2025-12-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2025.108895

Jennifer Klütsch , Verena Zimmermann , Sabine J. Schlittmeier

Downloading apps can pose significant privacy risks to users. While users are aware that their data is privacy-sensitive, they often do not read the privacy information provided. To support informed privacy decisions at the app download stage, we evaluated a two-stage nudge intervention in our scenario-based online study with 209 German-speaking Clickworker participants. In Stage 1, we examined whether nudges (color, reminder, social minority, social majority), compared to a control condition, can increase users’ engagement with privacy information in the app store. Once they have decided to engage, we examined how the recommendation of friends (vs. the app store) and the privacy rating (low vs. high) of a hybrid nudge with additional privacy information affected the subsequent download decision in Stage 2. Due to almost perfect separation in Stage 2, Bayesian logistic regressions were conducted. Our results found no evidence that any particular type of nudge increased the likelihood of users to engage with privacy information in Stage 1. Yet, all nudges, including the control condition, led high percentages of participants to click more about data protection (between 48.81% and 64.13%), with the subsequent privacy information in Stage 2 being considered a particularly important decision criterion for them. A “mere-exposure” and “foot-in-the-door” effect in our two-stage approach are discussed as possible explanations. Based on our findings, we derive recommendations for the design of privacy nudges that can be implemented by the app store or personal privacy assistants to promote informed privacy decisions.

下载应用程序可能会给用户带来重大的隐私风险。虽然用户知道他们的数据是隐私敏感的，但他们通常不会阅读所提供的隐私信息。为了在应用下载阶段支持知情的隐私决策，我们在基于场景的在线研究中评估了两阶段的助推干预，研究对象是209名讲德语的Clickworker参与者。在第一阶段，我们检验了与控制条件相比，轻推（游戏邦注：如颜色、提醒、社交少数派、社交多数）是否能够提高用户对应用商店隐私信息的参与度。一旦他们决定参与其中，我们便会在第二阶段检查好友推荐（相对于应用商店）以及带有额外隐私信息的混合推动的隐私评级（低与高）是如何影响随后的下载决定的。由于阶段2几乎完全分离，因此进行了贝叶斯逻辑回归。我们的研究结果没有发现任何证据表明，在第一阶段，任何特定类型的轻推都会增加用户参与隐私信息的可能性。然而，所有的推动，包括控制条件，导致高百分比的参与者点击更多关于数据保护（48.81%至64.13%），在第二阶段的后续隐私信息被认为是一个特别重要的决策标准。在我们的两阶段方法中，“仅仅暴露”和“脚踏实地”效应作为可能的解释进行了讨论。根据我们的研究结果，我们得出了隐私推动设计的建议，这些建议可以由应用商店或个人隐私助理实施，以促进知情的隐私决策。

{"title":"Choose to think: Nudging towards privacy informed decisions at the app download stage","authors":"Jennifer Klütsch , Verena Zimmermann , Sabine J. Schlittmeier","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108895","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108895","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Downloading apps can pose significant privacy risks to users. While users are aware that their data is privacy-sensitive, they often do not read the privacy information provided. To support informed privacy decisions at the app download stage, we evaluated a two-stage nudge intervention in our scenario-based online study with 209 German-speaking Clickworker participants. In Stage 1, we examined whether nudges (color, reminder, social minority, social majority), compared to a control condition, can increase users’ engagement with privacy information in the app store. Once they have decided to engage, we examined how the recommendation of friends (vs. the app store) and the privacy rating (low vs. high) of a hybrid nudge with additional privacy information affected the subsequent download decision in Stage 2. Due to almost perfect separation in Stage 2, Bayesian logistic regressions were conducted. Our results found no evidence that any particular type of nudge increased the likelihood of users to engage with privacy information in Stage 1. Yet, all nudges, including the control condition, led high percentages of participants to click <em>more about data protection</em> (between 48.81% and 64.13%), with the subsequent privacy information in Stage 2 being considered a particularly important decision criterion for them. A “mere-exposure” and “foot-in-the-door” effect in our two-stage approach are discussed as possible explanations. Based on our findings, we derive recommendations for the design of privacy nudges that can be implemented by the app store or personal privacy assistants to promote informed privacy decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 108895"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145790367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Negative perceptions of outsourcing to artificial intelligence 对外包给人工智能的负面看法

IF 8.9 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

Computers in Human Behavior

Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2025.108894

Scott Claessens, Pierce Veitch, Jim A.C. Everett

As artificial intelligence (AI) tools become increasingly integrated into daily life, people are beginning to outsource not only professional tasks but also socio-relational ones. Large language models like ChatGPT can generate wedding vows, speeches, and personal messages, raising questions about how individuals who use AI for such tasks are perceived by others. In this paper, we conduct six pre-registered studies with British participants (N = 3935) to understand how people view those who expend less effort by outsourcing tasks to AI in different ways. We highlight a tradeoff between efficiency and inferred moral character, authenticity, and value: outsourcing makes us think more negatively about not only the person and their motivations, but also the outsourced work itself. Importantly, this effect is not uniform. Reduced effort does not consistently lead to domain-general negative character perceptions across all tasks, but has particularly negative effects for outsourcing socio-relational tasks. Our results suggest that reduced effort is important not only because people value time and energy spent, but because expending less effort through outsourcing signals second-order perceptions that people are being less authentic and care less about the task. Our research highlights how relying on AI shapes our perceptions of the user, raising key philosophical questions about efficiency, authenticity, and social ties in a world filled with AI-mediated interactions.

随着人工智能（AI）工具越来越多地融入日常生活，人们不仅开始外包专业任务，还开始外包社会关系任务。像ChatGPT这样的大型语言模型可以生成婚礼誓词、演讲和个人信息，这引发了一个问题，即其他人如何看待使用人工智能完成这些任务的人。在本文中，我们对英国参与者（N = 3935）进行了六项预先注册的研究，以了解人们如何看待那些通过以不同方式将任务外包给人工智能而花费较少精力的人。我们强调了效率与推断出的道德品质、真实性和价值之间的权衡：外包使我们不仅对人和他们的动机有更消极的看法，而且对外包工作本身也有更消极的看法。重要的是，这种效果不是均匀的。减少的努力并不总是导致所有任务的领域普遍的负面性格感知，但对外包社会关系任务有特别的负面影响。我们的研究结果表明，减少工作量很重要，不仅因为人们重视所花费的时间和精力，而且因为通过外包减少工作量会发出二阶感知信号，即人们不那么真实，不那么关心任务。我们的研究强调了依赖人工智能如何塑造我们对用户的看法，在一个充满人工智能介导的互动的世界里，提出了关于效率、真实性和社会关系的关键哲学问题。

{"title":"Negative perceptions of outsourcing to artificial intelligence","authors":"Scott Claessens, Pierce Veitch, Jim A.C. Everett","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108894","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108894","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As artificial intelligence (AI) tools become increasingly integrated into daily life, people are beginning to outsource not only professional tasks but also socio-relational ones. Large language models like ChatGPT can generate wedding vows, speeches, and personal messages, raising questions about how individuals who use AI for such tasks are perceived by others. In this paper, we conduct six pre-registered studies with British participants (N = 3935) to understand how people view those who expend less effort by outsourcing tasks to AI in different ways. We highlight a tradeoff between efficiency and inferred moral character, authenticity, and value: outsourcing makes us think more negatively about not only the person and their motivations, but also the outsourced work itself. Importantly, this effect is not uniform. Reduced effort does not consistently lead to domain-general negative character perceptions across all tasks, but has particularly negative effects for outsourcing socio-relational tasks. Our results suggest that reduced effort is important not only because people value time and energy spent, but because expending less effort through outsourcing signals second-order perceptions that people are being less authentic and care less about the task. Our research highlights how relying on AI shapes our perceptions of the user, raising key philosophical questions about efficiency, authenticity, and social ties in a world filled with AI-mediated interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 108894"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145790366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Think twice, scroll once: Encouraging critical reflection as a shield against health misinformation and overgeneralized messaging by social media influencers 三思而后行，滚动一次：鼓励批判性反思，以抵御社交媒体影响者的健康错误信息和过度概括的信息

IF 8.9 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

Computers in Human Behavior

Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2025.108896

Jaroslava Kaňková, Jörg Matthes

Social media influencers (SMIs) are central actors in today's digital environments, shaping young people's beliefs and attitudes. Yet, their messaging often contains misleading claims. This study examines the effects of two types of misleading communication by SMIs, misinformation and overgeneralized messaging, and tests an intervention designed to foster critical evaluation of this content. We conducted a 3 (message: misinformation vs. overgeneralized vs. correct) × 2 (intervention: present vs. absent) mixed-design online experiment using realistic TikTok videos, with Gen Z participants (18–25 years old) and a two-week follow-up (Nw₁ = 562; Nw₂ = 370). Both misinformation and overgeneralized content undermined message credibility, belief accuracy, source trustworthiness, and parasocial relationships. The intervention largely reduced susceptibility to misinformation, but these effects diminished over time. For overgeneralized messaging, the intervention's effects were minimal and short-lived. This suggests that while critical reflection provides short-term protection against misinformation, its effects do not extend to subtler forms of misleading content.

社交媒体影响者（SMIs）是当今数字环境中的核心角色，塑造着年轻人的信仰和态度。然而，他们的信息往往包含误导性的说法。本研究考察了两种类型的SMIs误导性传播的影响，错误信息和过度概括的消息传递，并测试了旨在促进对该内容进行批判性评估的干预措施。我们使用真实的TikTok视频进行了3（信息：错误信息vs.过度概括vs.正确）x2（干预：在场vs.缺席）混合设计在线实验，Z世代参与者（18-25岁）和为期两周的随访（Nw1 = 562; Nw2 = 370）。错误信息和过度概括的内容都会破坏信息的可信度、信念的准确性、来源的可信度和副社会关系。干预在很大程度上降低了人们对错误信息的敏感性，但随着时间的推移，这些影响逐渐减弱。对于过度一般化的信息，干预的效果是最小的和短暂的。这表明，虽然批判性反思提供了针对错误信息的短期保护，但其效果并没有扩展到更微妙的误导性内容形式。

{"title":"Think twice, scroll once: Encouraging critical reflection as a shield against health misinformation and overgeneralized messaging by social media influencers","authors":"Jaroslava Kaňková, Jörg Matthes","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108896","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108896","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social media influencers (SMIs) are central actors in today's digital environments, shaping young people's beliefs and attitudes. Yet, their messaging often contains misleading claims. This study examines the effects of two types of misleading communication by SMIs, misinformation and overgeneralized messaging, and tests an intervention designed to foster critical evaluation of this content. We conducted a 3 (message: misinformation vs. overgeneralized vs. correct) × 2 (intervention: present vs. absent) mixed-design online experiment using realistic TikTok videos, with Gen Z participants (18–25 years old) and a two-week follow-up (<em>N</em>w<sub>1</sub> = 562; <em>N</em>w<sub>2</sub> = 370). Both misinformation and overgeneralized content undermined message credibility, belief accuracy, source trustworthiness, and parasocial relationships. The intervention largely reduced susceptibility to misinformation, but these effects diminished over time. For overgeneralized messaging, the intervention's effects were minimal and short-lived. This suggests that while critical reflection provides short-term protection against misinformation, its effects do not extend to subtler forms of misleading content.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 108896"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145840173","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Risk profiles for the perpetration of non-consensual sharing of sexual content among Spanish adolescents: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study 西班牙青少年非自愿分享性内容的风险概况：一项横断面和纵向研究

IF 8.9 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

Computers in Human Behavior

Pub Date : 2025-12-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2025.108889

Estrella Durán-Guerrero, Virginia Sánchez-Jiménez, Noelia Muñoz-Fernández

Non-consensual sharing of sexual content (NCS) represents a growing form of online sexual harassment, with significant prevalence among adolescents. This study examines, through a person-centered approach, the sociocognitive, emotional, and behavioral factors associated with NCS perpetration cross-sectionally and longitudinally. A total of 509 Spanish adolescents (49.5 % girls, average age = 14.98) participated at two time points: at baseline and six months later. At baseline, three risk profiles were identified: the “adjusted” profile (n = 433, 85 %): characterized by low levels of pro-sexual harassment attitudes and online sexual harassment perpetration, and high levels of emotions of moral responsibility; the “morally responsible, but aggressive” profile (n = 61, 12 %) characterized by moderate levels of pro-sexual harassment attitudes and emotions of moral responsibility, and moderate-high levels of online sexual harassment perpetration; and the “unemotional and aggressive” profile (n = 15, 3 %) characterized by moderate levels of pro-sexual harassment attitudes, high levels of online sexual harassment perpetration, and low levels of emotions of moral responsibility. Controlling for gender and age, belonging to the “morally responsible, but aggressive” and “unemotional and aggressive” profiles were associated with higher levels of NCS perpetration cross-sectionally (R² = 0.257) and longitudinally (R² = 0.171). Adolescents (mainly boys) who were involved in online sexual harassment behaviors, justifying them, and failing to feel any guilt in response to situations of this kind, were more likely to engage in NCS. The findings and practical implications are discussed.

未经同意分享性内容（NCS）是一种日益增长的网络性骚扰形式，在青少年中尤为普遍。本研究通过以人为本的方法，横断面和纵向研究了与NCS犯罪相关的社会认知、情感和行为因素。共有509名西班牙青少年（49.5%为女孩，平均年龄为14.98岁）在基线和6个月后两个时间点参与了研究。在基线上，确定了三种风险概况：“调整”概况（n = 433, 85%）：其特点是支持性骚扰的态度和网络性骚扰行为水平较低，道德责任情绪水平较高；“有道德责任，但有攻击性”的群体（n = 61,12 %），其特征是支持性骚扰的态度和道德责任情绪处于中等水平，网络性骚扰的实施处于中高水平；“非情绪化和攻击性”组（n = 15.3%）的特征是支持性骚扰的态度水平中等，网络性骚扰行为水平较高，道德责任情绪水平较低。在性别和年龄的控制下，属于“道德上负责，但有攻击性”和“不情绪化和有攻击性”的人在横断面上（R2 = 0.257）和纵向上（R2 = 0.171）与较高的NCS犯罪水平相关。青少年（主要是男孩）参与网络性骚扰行为，为其辩护，并且在这种情况下没有感到任何内疚，更有可能参与NCS。讨论了研究结果和实际意义。

{"title":"Risk profiles for the perpetration of non-consensual sharing of sexual content among Spanish adolescents: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study","authors":"Estrella Durán-Guerrero, Virginia Sánchez-Jiménez, Noelia Muñoz-Fernández","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108889","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108889","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Non-consensual sharing of sexual content (NCS) represents a growing form of online sexual harassment, with significant prevalence among adolescents. This study examines, through a person-centered approach, the sociocognitive, emotional, and behavioral factors associated with NCS perpetration cross-sectionally and longitudinally. A total of 509 Spanish adolescents (49.5 % girls, average age = 14.98) participated at two time points: at baseline and six months later. At baseline, three risk profiles were identified: the “adjusted” profile (<em>n</em> = 433, 85 %): characterized by low levels of pro-sexual harassment attitudes and online sexual harassment perpetration, and high levels of emotions of moral responsibility; the “morally responsible, but aggressive” profile (<em>n</em> = 61, 12 %) characterized by moderate levels of pro-sexual harassment attitudes and emotions of moral responsibility, and moderate-high levels of online sexual harassment perpetration; and the “unemotional and aggressive” profile (<em>n</em> = 15, 3 %) characterized by moderate levels of pro-sexual harassment attitudes, high levels of online sexual harassment perpetration, and low levels of emotions of moral responsibility. Controlling for gender and age, belonging to the “morally responsible, but aggressive” and “unemotional and aggressive” profiles were associated with higher levels of NCS perpetration cross-sectionally (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.257) and longitudinally (<em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0.171). Adolescents (mainly boys) who were involved in online sexual harassment behaviors, justifying them, and failing to feel any guilt in response to situations of this kind, were more likely to engage in NCS. The findings and practical implications are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 108889"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145737240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

For whom does online social support matter most? Exploring the joint moderating roles of depressive symptoms and physical functioning in the relationship between online social support and quality of life 网络社会支持对谁最重要？探讨抑郁症状和身体功能在网络社会支持与生活质量关系中的共同调节作用

IF 8.9 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

Computers in Human Behavior

Pub Date : 2025-12-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2025.108893

Juwon Hwang

Social support is a critical determinant of well-being, but its benefits may not be uniform across individuals. As more people connect online, it is important to understand when and for whom online social support is most beneficial. This study investigates how online social support relates to quality of life, focusing on the moderating roles of depressive symptoms and physical functioning, and compares these effects to a parallel model of offline social support. In both cases, social support was operationalized as perceived emotional support. Using a U.S. sample of 2650 adults, we test moderation in separate models for online and offline support. Results show that online support is positively associated with quality of life, with stronger effects for individuals experiencing higher depressive symptoms and lower physical functioning. A three-way interaction reveals that online support's benefits are most pronounced for those with both high depressive symptoms and low physical functioning. In contrast, offline support was also positively associated with quality of life and interacted significantly with depressive symptoms, but not with physical functioning or the three-way combination. Findings contribute to social compensation theory by showing that online environments provide especially effective support for individuals facing compounded psychological and physical challenges.

社会支持是幸福的关键决定因素，但它的好处可能因人而异。随着越来越多的人在网上联系，了解何时以及对谁来说在线社会支持是最有益的是很重要的。本研究探讨了在线社会支持与生活质量的关系，重点关注抑郁症状和身体功能的调节作用，并将这些影响与线下社会支持的平行模型进行了比较。在这两种情况下，社会支持都被操作化为感知情感支持。我们以美国2650名成年人为样本，在在线和离线支持的不同模型中测试了适度性。结果表明，在线支持与生活质量呈正相关，对抑郁症状较重、身体功能较差的人有更强的影响。一项三方互动显示，在线支持的好处对那些抑郁症状严重、身体功能低下的人最为明显。相比之下，离线支持也与生活质量呈正相关，并与抑郁症状显著相互作用，但与身体功能或三方组合无关。研究结果表明，网络环境为面临复杂心理和生理挑战的个人提供了特别有效的支持，这有助于社会补偿理论。

{"title":"For whom does online social support matter most? Exploring the joint moderating roles of depressive symptoms and physical functioning in the relationship between online social support and quality of life","authors":"Juwon Hwang","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108893","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108893","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social support is a critical determinant of well-being, but its benefits may not be uniform across individuals. As more people connect online, it is important to understand when and for whom online social support is most beneficial. This study investigates how online social support relates to quality of life, focusing on the moderating roles of depressive symptoms and physical functioning, and compares these effects to a parallel model of offline social support. In both cases, social support was operationalized as perceived emotional support. Using a U.S. sample of 2650 adults, we test moderation in separate models for online and offline support. Results show that online support is positively associated with quality of life, with stronger effects for individuals experiencing higher depressive symptoms and lower physical functioning. A three-way interaction reveals that online support's benefits are most pronounced for those with both high depressive symptoms and low physical functioning. In contrast, offline support was also positively associated with quality of life and interacted significantly with depressive symptoms, but not with physical functioning or the three-way combination. Findings contribute to social compensation theory by showing that online environments provide especially effective support for individuals facing compounded psychological and physical challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 108893"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145737239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Altered uncertainty processing during adaptive learning in internet gaming disorder 网络游戏障碍自适应学习中不确定性加工的改变

IF 8.9 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

Computers in Human Behavior

Pub Date : 2025-12-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2025.108882

Yi-Xu Pang , Lei Zhang , Yuan-Wei Yao , Marc N. Potenza , Lu Liu

Internet gaming disorder (IGD) is characterized by difficulty in stopping online gaming behaviors despite negative consequences. The symptoms may reflect deficits in adaptive learning related to uncertainty representations of changing environments. However, how individuals with IGD process uncertainty information during probabilistic learning has rarely been assessed. A total of 78 participants, including 38 IGD participants and 40 healthy control subjects (HCs), completed a probabilistic learning task, in which reward probabilities and probability reversals were manipulated to create an uncertain environment. Overall and trial-by-trial-based uncertainty indices were estimated using computational modelling. The IGD group showed lower prediction accuracy and a higher proportion of choice switches, as compared to HCs. Computational modeling identified an interaction between task probability difference level and group in trial-based uncertainty. Moreover, the probability-difference-induced uncertainty in the IGD group was associated with poorer task performance. The results suggest that impaired probabilistic learning performance under uncertainty in IGD participants may contribute to insensitivity to environmental changes, which may have a negative impact on their daily choices. The findings highlight a novel, quantifiable approach to advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying learning deficits in IGD.

网络游戏障碍（IGD）的特征是尽管有负面影响，但仍难以停止网络游戏行为。这些症状可能反映了与变化环境的不确定性表征相关的适应性学习缺陷。然而，IGD个体在概率学习过程中如何处理不确定性信息却很少被评估。78名参与者，包括38名IGD参与者和40名健康对照组（hc），完成了一个概率学习任务，在这个任务中，操纵奖励概率和概率逆转来创造一个不确定的环境。使用计算模型估计总体和逐个试验的不确定性指数。与hc相比，IGD组的预测准确性较低，选择开关的比例较高。计算模型确定了在基于试验的不确定性中任务概率差异水平和组之间的相互作用。此外，IGD组的概率差异引起的不确定性与较差的任务表现有关。结果表明，IGD参与者在不确定性下的概率学习表现受损可能导致对环境变化不敏感，这可能对他们的日常选择产生负面影响。研究结果强调了一种新的、可量化的方法来促进对IGD学习缺陷机制的理解。

{"title":"Altered uncertainty processing during adaptive learning in internet gaming disorder","authors":"Yi-Xu Pang , Lei Zhang , Yuan-Wei Yao , Marc N. Potenza , Lu Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108882","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108882","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Internet gaming disorder (IGD) is characterized by difficulty in stopping online gaming behaviors despite negative consequences. The symptoms may reflect deficits in adaptive learning related to uncertainty representations of changing environments. However, how individuals with IGD process uncertainty information during probabilistic learning has rarely been assessed. A total of 78 participants, including 38 IGD participants and 40 healthy control subjects (HCs), completed a probabilistic learning task, in which reward probabilities and probability reversals were manipulated to create an uncertain environment. Overall and trial-by-trial-based uncertainty indices were estimated using computational modelling. The IGD group showed lower prediction accuracy and a higher proportion of choice switches, as compared to HCs. Computational modeling identified an interaction between task probability difference level and group in trial-based uncertainty. Moreover, the probability-difference-induced uncertainty in the IGD group was associated with poorer task performance. The results suggest that impaired probabilistic learning performance under uncertainty in IGD participants may contribute to insensitivity to environmental changes, which may have a negative impact on their daily choices. The findings highlight a novel, quantifiable approach to advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying learning deficits in IGD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 108882"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145790368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Mapping the symptom structure of internet gaming disorder among adolescents: Insights from network and Bayesian graph analyses 描绘青少年网络游戏障碍的症状结构：来自网络和贝叶斯图分析的见解

IF 8.9 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL

Computers in Human Behavior

Pub Date : 2025-12-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2025.108890

Firoj Al-Mamun , Moneerah Mohammad ALmerab , Mohammed A. Mamun

Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD) has become an emerging public health concern among adolescents, particularly in low-resource setting. Despite growing international interest, little is known about how IGD symptoms interact and reinforce one another in these contexts. This study aimed to elucidate the symptom structure of IGD among Bangladeshi adolescents. Specifically, to (i) estimate the undirected network structure of IGD symptoms, (ii) identify central and predictable symptoms, (iii) examine gender-based differences in network structure, and (iv) explore directional symptom pathways using Bayesian Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs). A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1030 secondary school students in northern Bangladesh. Data were collected using the nine-item Internet Gaming Disorder Scale–Short Form (IGDS9-SF), while both regularized partial correlation networks and DAGs were estimated to examine symptom associations and potential directional pathways. Subgroup comparisons by gender were conducted using the Network Comparison Test (NCT). The undirected network revealed strong conditional associations among core IGD symptoms, particularly between Preoccupation, Tolerance, and Withdrawal. Centrality analyses identified Give Up Activities, Withdrawal, and Preoccupation as the most structurally important symptoms, and predictability estimates indicated strong local symptom connectivity. The NCT showed no significant differences in network structure or global strength between males and females. DAG analysis highlighted Withdrawal as a likely initiating symptom, with strong probable directional paths toward Tolerance, Loss of Control, and Continued Use. These findings provide symptom-level insights into IGD's psychopathological structure and offer guidance for targeted, school-based mental health interventions in resource-constrained settings.

网络游戏障碍（IGD）已成为青少年中一个新兴的公共卫生问题，特别是在资源匮乏的环境中。尽管国际上的兴趣越来越大，但对于这些情况下IGD症状如何相互作用和相互加强知之甚少。本研究旨在阐明孟加拉国青少年IGD的症状结构。具体来说，要(i)估计IGD症状的无向网络结构，（ii）识别中心和可预测的症状，（iii）检查网络结构中基于性别的差异，以及（iv）使用贝叶斯有向无环图（dag）探索定向症状途径。对孟加拉国北部1030名中学生进行了横断面调查。数据使用9项网络游戏障碍量表（IGDS9-SF）收集，同时估计正则化部分相关网络和dag来检查症状关联和潜在的定向途径。使用网络比较测试（NCT）按性别进行亚组比较。无定向网络揭示了核心IGD症状之间强烈的条件关联，特别是在专注、耐受性和戒断之间。中心性分析确定了放弃活动、戒断和专注是结构上最重要的症状，可预测性估计表明了很强的局部症状连通性。NCT显示男性和女性在网络结构和整体强度上没有显著差异。DAG分析强调了戒断可能是一种初始症状，有很强的可能的方向路径，导致耐受性，失去控制，并继续使用。这些发现为IGD的精神病理结构提供了症状层面的见解，并为资源受限环境下有针对性的、以学校为基础的心理健康干预提供了指导。

{"title":"Mapping the symptom structure of internet gaming disorder among adolescents: Insights from network and Bayesian graph analyses","authors":"Firoj Al-Mamun , Moneerah Mohammad ALmerab , Mohammed A. Mamun","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108890","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.chb.2025.108890","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD) has become an emerging public health concern among adolescents, particularly in low-resource setting. Despite growing international interest, little is known about how IGD symptoms interact and reinforce one another in these contexts. This study aimed to elucidate the symptom structure of IGD among Bangladeshi adolescents. Specifically, to (i) estimate the undirected network structure of IGD symptoms, (ii) identify central and predictable symptoms, (iii) examine gender-based differences in network structure, and (iv) explore directional symptom pathways using Bayesian Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs). A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1030 secondary school students in northern Bangladesh. Data were collected using the nine-item Internet Gaming Disorder Scale–Short Form (IGDS9-SF), while both regularized partial correlation networks and DAGs were estimated to examine symptom associations and potential directional pathways. Subgroup comparisons by gender were conducted using the Network Comparison Test (NCT). The undirected network revealed strong conditional associations among core IGD symptoms, particularly between <em>Preoccupation</em>, <em>Tolerance</em>, and <em>Withdrawal</em>. Centrality analyses identified <em>Give Up Activities</em>, <em>Withdrawal</em>, and <em>Preoccupation</em> as the most structurally important symptoms, and predictability estimates indicated strong local symptom connectivity. The NCT showed no significant differences in network structure or global strength between males and females. DAG analysis highlighted <em>Withdrawal</em> as a likely initiating symptom, with strong probable directional paths toward <em>Tolerance</em>, <em>Loss of Control</em>, and <em>Continued Use</em>. These findings provide symptom-level insights into IGD's psychopathological structure and offer guidance for targeted, school-based mental health interventions in resource-constrained settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 108890"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145737243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0