Respiratory Medicine and Research最新文献

Background

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is a standard of care for hypercapnic chronic respiratory failure (CRF). Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) frequently contributes to hypoventilation in CRF patients. CPAP improves hypercapnia in selected COPD and obese patients, like NIV. We aimed to describe the profile of patients switching from NIV to CPAP in a cohort of patients on long-term ventilation and to identify the factors associated with a successful switch.

Methods

In this case-control study, 88 consecutive patients who were candidates for a NIV-CPAP switch were compared with 266 controls among 394 ventilated patients treated at the Dijon University Hospital between 2015 and 2020. They followed a standardized protocol including a poly(somno)graphy recorded after NIV withdrawal for three nights. CPAP trial was performed if severe OSA was confirmed. Patients were checked for recurrent hypoventilation after 1 and 23[14–46] nights under CPAP.

Results

Patients were 53% males, median age 65 [56–74] years, and median BMI 34 [25–38.5] kg/m². Sixty four percent of patients were safely switched and remained on long-term CPAP. In multivariate analysis, the probability of a NIV-CPAP switch was correlated to older age (OR: 1.3 [1.01–1.06]), BMI (OR: 1.7 [1.03–1.12]), CRF etiology (OR for COPD: 20.37 [4.2–98,72], OR for obesity: 7.31 [1.58–33.74]), circumstances of NIV initiation (OR for acute exacerbation: 11.64 [2.03–66.62]), lower pressure support (OR: 0.90 [0.73–0.92]), lower baseline PaCO₂ (OR: 0.85 [0.80–0.91]) and lower compliance (OR: 0.76 [0.64–0.90]). Among 72 patients who went home under CPAP, pressure support level was the only factor associated with the outcome of the NIV-CPAP switch, even ^{after adjustment for BMI and age (p = 0.01}) with a non-linear correlation. Etiology of chronic respiratory failure, age, BMI, baseline PaCO₂, circumstances of NIV initiation, time under home NIV or NIV compliance were not predictive of the outcome of the NIV-CPAP switch.

Conclusions

A NIV-CPAP switch is possible in real life conditions in stable obese and COPD patients with underlying OSA.

Background

Studies have shown improvement in overall survival with anti-PD1/PD-L1 molecules in combination with cisplatin/carboplatin and etoposide as a first-line treatment for Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC). However, first-line efficacy remains limited and well below that observed in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Etoposide may have a detrimental effect on lymphocyte activation, which could explain the limited benefit of immunotherapy in the first line and the lack of benefit in the second line for patients previously exposed to high levels of etoposide.

Methods

We initiated a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase II study of a chemotherapy regimen with durvalumab, combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel for extensive disease SCLC. Eligible patients will receive durvalumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel every 3 weeks for up to 4 cycles, followed by durvalumab every 4 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 67 patients will be enrolled in this study, with a 12-month enrollment period and 36-month follow-up. The primary endpoint is Overall Survival (OS) rate at 12 months. Secondary endpoints are best response rate, OS, OS at 24- and 36 months, progression free survival (PFS), duration of response, quality of life and safety.

Results

This study aims to establish the efficacy of durvalumab combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with extensive disease Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Clinical trial registration

EU CT: 2023-504670-38-00.

Background

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) is a type of autoantibodies associated with vasculitis. ANCA positivity is commonly observed in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. 7%-10% of ANCA-positive ILD patients don't present any symptoms of systemic vasculitis and are termed ANCA-positive idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (ANCA-IIP). Some researchers propose that ANCA-IIP should be categorized as interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF), although the official ATS/ERS statements exclude ANCA-IIP from this classification. Whether ANCA-IIP should be categorized into the entity of IPAF is still debatable.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with ANCA-IIP and those with IPAF were analyzed in a retrospective study of ILD. The clinical outcomes were determined through pulmonary function tests (PFTs) after a one-year follow-up, as well as assessing all-cause mortality.

Results

27 patients with ANCA-IIP and 143 patients with IPAF were analyzed from a cohort of 995 patients with ILD. Patients in the ANCA-IIP group had an older age and a high proportion of males compared to those in the IPAF group. PFT results at baseline were similar between the two groups, except for a better FEV1% in the ANCA-IIP group. Glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive therapy improved pulmonary function in patients with IPAF, but it continued to deteriorate after one year of treatment in the ANCA-IIP group. Furthermore, the all-cause mortality rate was significantly higher in the ANCA-IIP group than in the IPAF group (22.2% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.017).

Conclusion

The responses to glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive therapy differ between the ANCA-IIP and IPAF groups, leading to divergent prognoses. Therefore, it is inappropriate to classify ANCA-IIP as part of IPAF.

Background

Most lung cancers are diagnosed at an advanced stage and therefore have a poor prognosis. One major challenge is to choose the most adapted sampling technique to obtain a rapid pathological diagnosis so as to start treatment as early as possible. A growing number of techniques have been developed in recent years. This study sought to assess the diagnostic efficiency of each, along with the respective duration of the diagnostic pathways.

Methods

This retrospective, bicentric, observational study enrolled patients with inoperable lung cancer (stage III or IV) diagnosed in 2018–2019. Diagnostic efficiency was assessed based on the different examinations performed to achieve a precise diagnosis (pathology, immunohistochemistry, and/or molecular biology). The time between the first medical contact and treatment initiation was also assessed.

Results

Overall, 625 patients were included (median age 67 years; men 67 %; adenocarcinoma 55 %). The most frequent examinations were bronchial endoscopy (n = 469, 75 %), followed by metastasis biopsy (n = 137, 21.9 %) and guided transthoracic core-needle biopsy (TCNB) (n = 116, 18.6 %). 372 patients had only one procedure (59.5 %), mainly bronchial endoscopy (n = 217, 34.7 %) and metastasis biopsy (n = 71, 11 %). The most efficient examination was thoracic surgery (surgical pleural biopsy, (n = 32, 100 %); mediastinoscopy (n = 26, 96.3 %); surgical pulmonary biopsy (n = 14, 93.3 %). The second most efficient examination was metastasis biopsy (n = 126, 94 %) followed by guided TCNB (n = 108, 93.1 %). The median time from first medical contact to first examination was 4 days (interquartile range 25 %–75 % 1–8). The median time from first medical contact to pathological result was 17 days (10–34). The median time from first medical contact to treatment start was 48 days (30–69).

Conclusions

In order to make an accurate and rapid diagnosis of lung cancer, it is crucial to choose the most appropriate technique. Bronchial endoscopy remains the first-line examination for central lesions, as it is efficient and easily accessible. Guided TCNB and metastasis biopsy are the preferred techniques for peripheral lesions. The choice of the diagnostic technique should be part of a multidisciplinary approach and a dedicated pathway to optimize initial management.

Background

Nebulized Hypertonic saline (HS) and positive expiratory pressure device (PEP) are often used in patients with bronchiectasis. We sought to describe the clinical characteristics in patients using HS and PEP, utilizing a large national database registry.

Methods

Data from the US Bronchiectasis and NTM Research Registry were used in this study. Patients with a diagnosis of bronchiectasis were included. Eligible patients were assigned to one of four mutually exclusive groups: HS only, PEP only, HS & PEP, or no airway clearance or mucoactive agent. Descriptive statistics were computed for the overall study population and stratified by the four groups. One-way ANOVA and chi-square tests were used to test the difference in the means in continuous variables and the association between categorical variables (respectively) across the four groups.

Results

A total of 2195 patients were included. Of those with bronchiectasis and a productive cough, a greater number of patients utilized HS only vs PEP only (17.5 % vs 9.1 %, p < 0.001). Similar association was found in those with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (22.3 % HS only vs 6.5 % PEP only, p < 0.001). There was a higher number of patients who used HS and PEP therapy in combination vs PEP therapy alone (25.0 % vs 9.1 %, p = 0.002), in those with a productive cough.

Conclusions

In patients with bronchiectasis and a productive cough or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, HS is used more often than PEP alone. There is a need for further analysis to compare these two modalities and explore the factors influencing their utilization.

Background

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a bronchoscopic procedure for patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, but randomized controlled studies of its efficacy in severe asthma with frequent exacerbations are lacking. The current aim was to assess BT efficacy in this patient population.

Methods

Thirty patients with asthma (GINA 5) who had experienced at least four severe exacerbations in the preceding year were randomized to BT (n = 15) or control groups (n = 15). All patients had four follow-up visits over the following 15 months, corresponding to 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the last procedure for the BT group. The primary outcome was number of exacerbations at 15 months after inclusion (i.e. 12 months after bronchial thermoplasty).

Results

All but three patients had received an asthma biologic without receiving benefit. In the year preceding enrollment, patients in the BT group had an average of five exacerbations, compared with six among controls. For patients in the BT group, oral steroid intake was 9.3 mg/d, compared with 11.0 mg/d among controls. The BT group had 1.58 fewer severe exacerbations (mean, 6.09) compared with controls (mean, 8.28) in the 12-month period after the therapy (p = 0.047). Oral steroid intake during follow-up after BT was significantly lower in the BT group (ratio vs controls: 0.61; p = 0.0002). Quality-of-life measures between inclusion and the last visit were significantly improved in the BT group, but not among controls. Few mild to moderate adverse events were reported, and all were controlled within days.

Conclusion

In patients with severe asthma and frequent severe exacerbations, BT significantly decreased the rate of severe exacerbations and oral steroid intake and led to improved quality of life during the 15 months after inclusion. BT appears to offer a therapeutic option for severe asthma with frequent exacerbations.

Background

Refractory chronic cough (RCC) patients typically complain of a dry cough. Sputum production in these patients has rarely been described in the literature. However, sputum production in RCC may be common, troublesome and particularly challenging to manage.

Aims

We aimed to characterise patients referred to our regional specialist cough clinic who have significant sputum production (≥1 teaspoon of sputum daily) and compare their demographics, symptomatology and investigation results to those presenting with a dry RCC.

Methods

A retrospective case note analysis of all consecutive referrals to a tertiary cough clinic identified as having a productive cough (≥1 teaspoon of sputum daily) was performed over a 12-month period. They were compared to a paired number of patients with dry RCC.

Results

Patients with productive cough represented nearly a quarter (98/398, 24.6 %) of new patient referrals to the clinic. Demographic information, symptomatology and investigation results were comparable to those with a dry RCC. Over a third, 35.8 % of patients with a productive cough reported expectorating an egg-cupful of sputum or more a day. Nearly half, 40% of those with high volume sputum production (≥egg-cupful daily) had both a normal CT thorax and normal spirometry.

Conclusions

Patients with RCC can expectorate significant volumes of sputum in the absence of underlying lung disease. This group have similar demographics to those with dry RCC. This is the first piece of work to our knowledge to describe this cohort. Future work needs to acknowledge this forgotten phenotype to ensure that they receive comprehensive evaluation and evidenced based treatment.

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is frequent among patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) and can persist despite the optimal correction of respiratory events (apnea, hypopnea and respiratory efforts), using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or mandibular advancement device. Symptoms like apathy and fatigue may be mistaken for EDS. In addition, EDS has multi-factorial origin, which makes its evaluation complex. The marketing authorization [Autorisation de Mise sur le Marché (AMM)] for two wake-promoting agents (solriamfetol and pitolisant) raises several practical issues for clinicians. This consensus paper presents recommendations of good clinical practice to identify and evaluate EDS in this context, and to manage and follow-up the patients. It was conducted under the mandate of the French Societies for sleep medicine and for pneumology [Société Française de Recherche et de Médecine du Sommeil (SFRMS) and Société de Pneumologie de Langue Française (SPLF)]. A management algorithm is suggested, as well as a list of conditions during which the patient should be referred to a sleep center or a sleep specialist. The benefit/risk balance of a wake-promoting drug in residual EDS in OSAHS patients must be regularly reevaluated, especially in elderly patients with increased cardiovascular and psychiatric disorders risks. This consensus is based on the scientific knowledge at the time of the publication and may be revised according to their evolution.