首页 > 最新文献

Agricultural & Environmental Letters最新文献

英文 中文
Missing the grassland for the cows: Scaling grass-finished beef production entails tradeoffs—Comment on “Grazed perennial grasslands can match current beef production while contributing to climate mitigation and adaptation” 为了奶牛而失去草原:扩大草产牛肉生产需要权衡——评论“放牧的多年生草地可以与目前的牛肉生产相匹配,同时有助于减缓和适应气候变化”
IF 2.6 4区 农林科学 Pub Date : 2022-07-11 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.20073
Matthew Hayek

In a recent commentary article, Randall Jackson (2022) claims that U.S. maize croplands currently growing cattle feed can be converted to perennial pastures without incurring either a loss of beef production or agricultural expansion. Grass-finished cattle fatten up slower and reach lower slaughter weights than grain-finished cattle (Pelletier et al., 2010). Therefore, to support present beef production using only pastures, more finishing cattle must be raised and slaughtered. The author recognizes this and attempts to quantify whether current maize production regions could instead grow sufficient perennial grasses and forages. He finds that an additional 7.6 million finishing cattle must be raised to produce exclusively grass-fed beef. He then calculates that 4.9 million ha of maize croplands growing cattle feed could, instead, grow sufficient grass to support these cattle.

However, the author makes a fundamental oversight—those 7.6 million additional finishing cattle must come from somewhere; they need mothers. Finishing cattle are supported on the “back end” by large cow-calf and stocker herds on pastures, who replace the current finishing cattle when they are slaughtered. Unlike pigs and chickens who can have many offspring per year, cows have long gestation periods of 9 mo, like humans, birthing at most one offspring each year. Cow gestation periods are so long and cattle maturity is so slow that cattle on pastures outnumber finishing cattle in feedlots by nearly five to one (Figure 1).

To raise 7.6 million more grass-finished cattle, U.S. ranchers would need to raise 7.7 million more cows, along with 7.8 million more calves and stocker cattle on pastures. Altogether, an exclusively grass-finished system requires 23.1 million (30%) more cattle to produce the same quantity of beef (Table 1), not 7.6 million (10%) more as the author models. We published these findings in a study that was cited by the author (Hayek & Garrett, 2018), but he missed this central finding.

Larger grass-finished cattle herds require additional resources. Optimistically, a maximum of 71% of current production could be met if the United States shifted its maize feed crops for finishing cattle to perennial forages (Hayek & Garrett, 2018). We assumed a similar potential forage yield on current maize croplands of 10.3 dry matter (DM) ha–1 yr–1, which lies within the author's range of 8–12 DM ha–1 yr–1. Maintaining these yields requires fertilizer inputs: we assumed forages were produced using conventional hay and alfalfa production, and the author's range of 8–12 DM ha–1 yr–1 is derived from a study of U.S. Upper Midwest pastures that applied fertilizer at a rate of 57 kg N ha–1 yr–1 (Oates et al., 2011). These findings are consistent with multiple other studies, which demonstrate that grass-f

在最近的一篇评论文章中,Randall Jackson(2022)声称,目前种植牛饲料的美国玉米田可以转变为多年生牧场,而不会造成牛肉生产或农业扩张的损失。草制成的牛比谷物制成的牛长得更慢,屠宰重量更低(Pelletier等人,2010年)。因此,为了支持目前仅使用牧场的牛肉生产,必须饲养和屠宰更多的精加工牛。作者认识到了这一点,并试图量化目前的玉米生产区是否可以种植足够的多年生草和牧草。他发现,为了生产纯草饲牛肉,还必须饲养760万头精加工牛。然后,他计算出,490万公顷种植牛饲料的玉米田可以种植足够的草来养活这些牛。然而,作者提出了一个根本性的疏忽——那760万头额外的肥牛一定来自某个地方;他们需要母亲。肥牛在“后端”由牧场上的大型小牛和畜牧群支撑,在屠宰时取代目前的肥牛。与每年可以生育许多后代的猪和鸡不同,奶牛的妊娠期很长,为9个月,与人类一样,每年最多生育一个后代。奶牛的妊娠期如此之长,成熟度如此之慢,以至于牧场上的牛比饲养场里的肥牛多出近五比一(图1)。
{"title":"Missing the grassland for the cows: Scaling grass-finished beef production entails tradeoffs—Comment on “Grazed perennial grasslands can match current beef production while contributing to climate mitigation and adaptation”","authors":"Matthew Hayek","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20073","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.20073","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In a recent commentary article, Randall Jackson (<span>2022</span>) claims that U.S. maize croplands currently growing cattle feed can be converted to perennial pastures without incurring either a loss of beef production or agricultural expansion. Grass-finished cattle fatten up slower and reach lower slaughter weights than grain-finished cattle (Pelletier et al., <span>2010</span>). Therefore, to support present beef production using only pastures, more finishing cattle must be raised and slaughtered. The author recognizes this and attempts to quantify whether current maize production regions could instead grow sufficient perennial grasses and forages. He finds that an additional 7.6 million finishing cattle must be raised to produce exclusively grass-fed beef. He then calculates that 4.9 million ha of maize croplands growing cattle feed could, instead, grow sufficient grass to support these cattle.</p><p>However, the author makes a fundamental oversight—those 7.6 million additional finishing cattle must come from somewhere; they need mothers. Finishing cattle are supported on the “back end” by large cow-calf and stocker herds on pastures, who replace the current finishing cattle when they are slaughtered. Unlike pigs and chickens who can have many offspring per year, cows have long gestation periods of 9 mo, like humans, birthing at most one offspring each year. Cow gestation periods are so long and cattle maturity is so slow that cattle on pastures outnumber finishing cattle in feedlots by nearly five to one (Figure 1).</p><p>To raise 7.6 million more grass-finished cattle, U.S. ranchers would need to raise 7.7 million more cows, along with 7.8 million more calves and stocker cattle on pastures. Altogether, an exclusively grass-finished system requires 23.1 million (30%) more cattle to produce the same quantity of beef (Table 1), not 7.6 million (10%) more as the author models. We published these findings in a study that was cited by the author (Hayek &amp; Garrett, <span>2018</span>), but he missed this central finding.</p><p>Larger grass-finished cattle herds require additional resources. Optimistically, a maximum of 71% of current production could be met if the United States shifted its maize feed crops for finishing cattle to perennial forages (Hayek &amp; Garrett, <span>2018</span>). We assumed a similar potential forage yield on current maize croplands of 10.3 dry matter (DM) ha<sup>–1</sup> yr<sup>–1</sup>, which lies within the author's range of 8–12 DM ha<sup>–1</sup> yr<sup>–1</sup>. Maintaining these yields requires fertilizer inputs: we assumed forages were produced using conventional hay and alfalfa production, and the author's range of 8–12 DM ha<sup>–1</sup> yr<sup>–1</sup> is derived from a study of U.S. Upper Midwest pastures that applied fertilizer at a rate of 57 kg N ha<sup>–1</sup> yr<sup>–1</sup> (Oates et al., <span>2011</span>). These findings are consistent with multiple other studies, which demonstrate that grass-f","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20073","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43017128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Post-harvest drone flights to measure weed growth and yield associations 收获后无人机飞行测量杂草生长和产量关联
IF 2.6 4区 农林科学 Pub Date : 2022-06-14 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.20081
Jarrod O. Miller, Amy L. Shober, Mark J. VanGessel

Drone flights are often only performed during the growing season, with no data collected once harvest has been completed, although they could be used to measure winter annual weed growth. Using a drone mounted with a multispectral sensor, we flew small plot corn (Zea mays L.) fertility, cover crop, and population studies at black layer and 0–14 d after harvest (DAH). Yields had positive correlations to normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) at black layer but often had negative correlations to corn yields 0–14 DAH. After harvest, NDVI could be associated with weed growth, and negative correlations to yield could point to reduced corn canopy allowing light to reach late-season weeds. In fertility studies, excess nitrogen appears to increase weed biomass after harvest, which can be easily identified through drone imagery. Flights should be performed after corn harvest as weed growth may provide additional insight into management decisions.

无人机飞行通常只在生长季节进行,在收获完成后没有收集数据,尽管它们可以用来测量冬季的年度杂草生长情况。利用安装有多光谱传感器的无人机,对小块玉米(Zea mays L.)的肥力、覆盖作物和种群在黑层和收获后0-14 d (DAH)进行了研究。玉米产量与黑色层归一化植被指数(NDVI)呈显著正相关,与0 ~ 14 DAH呈显著负相关。收获后,NDVI可能与杂草生长有关,而与产量的负相关可能表明玉米冠层减少,使光照能够照射到晚季杂草。在生育力研究中,过量的氮似乎会增加收获后的杂草生物量,这可以通过无人机图像很容易地识别出来。飞行应在玉米收获后进行,因为杂草的生长可能为管理决策提供额外的见解。
{"title":"Post-harvest drone flights to measure weed growth and yield associations","authors":"Jarrod O. Miller,&nbsp;Amy L. Shober,&nbsp;Mark J. VanGessel","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20081","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.20081","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Drone flights are often only performed during the growing season, with no data collected once harvest has been completed, although they could be used to measure winter annual weed growth. Using a drone mounted with a multispectral sensor, we flew small plot corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) fertility, cover crop, and population studies at black layer and 0–14 d after harvest (DAH). Yields had positive correlations to normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) at black layer but often had negative correlations to corn yields 0–14 DAH. After harvest, NDVI could be associated with weed growth, and negative correlations to yield could point to reduced corn canopy allowing light to reach late-season weeds. In fertility studies, excess nitrogen appears to increase weed biomass after harvest, which can be easily identified through drone imagery. Flights should be performed after corn harvest as weed growth may provide additional insight into management decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20081","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43995427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Overlooked tools for studying soil nitrogen depolymerization: Aminopeptidase assays using nitroanilide substrates 被忽视的研究土壤氮解聚的工具:使用硝基苯胺底物的氨基肽酶测定
IF 2.6 4区 农林科学 Pub Date : 2022-06-14 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.20079
Andrew J Margenot, Rachel C Daughtridge

Aminopeptidases are one of the extracellular hydrolytic enzymes that catalyze organic nitrogen (N) depolymerization and are commonly assayed using fluorogenic substrates. However, chromogenic substrates based on para-nitroaniline (pNA) developed for the study of aminopeptidases in the 1960s have been underutilized. To gauge the use of pNA substrates to assay soil aminopeptidases, a systematic literature review was conducted. We identified 61 studies that were nearly all limited to measuring leucine and/or glycine aminopeptidases, despite the commercial availability of at least six other aminopeptidase-specific pNA substrates. Assay parameters of scale (slurry vs. direct incubations), matrix type, buffer pH, substrate concentration, assay duration and temperature, termination, and colorimetry indicated a lack of standardization and a confusion of pNA with pNP substrates despite important differences in abiotic hydrolysis and absorbance maxima. Future studies should systematically evaluate and standardize these parameters and assess the sensitivity of other amino acid-specific aminopeptidases to carbon (C), N, and sulfur (S) cycling.

氨基肽酶是催化有机氮(N)解聚的细胞外水解酶之一,通常使用荧光底物进行测定。然而,20世纪60年代为研究氨肽酶而开发的基于对硝基苯胺(pNA)的显色底物尚未得到充分利用。为了评估pNA底物在测定土壤氨肽酶中的应用,进行了系统的文献综述。我们确定了61项研究,这些研究几乎都局限于测量亮氨酸和/或甘氨酸氨肽酶,尽管至少有六种其他氨肽酶特异性pNA底物可在商业上获得。规模(浆料与直接孵育)、基质类型、缓冲液pH、底物浓度、测定持续时间和温度、终止和比色法的测定参数表明,尽管在非生物水解和吸光度最大值方面存在重要差异,但pNA与pNP底物缺乏标准化和混淆。未来的研究应系统地评估和标准化这些参数,并评估其他氨基酸特异性氨肽酶对碳(C)、氮和硫(S)循环的敏感性。
{"title":"Overlooked tools for studying soil nitrogen depolymerization: Aminopeptidase assays using nitroanilide substrates","authors":"Andrew J Margenot,&nbsp;Rachel C Daughtridge","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20079","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.20079","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Aminopeptidases are one of the extracellular hydrolytic enzymes that catalyze organic nitrogen (N) depolymerization and are commonly assayed using fluorogenic substrates. However, chromogenic substrates based on <i>para</i>-nitroaniline (<i>p</i>NA) developed for the study of aminopeptidases in the 1960s have been underutilized. To gauge the use of <i>p</i>NA substrates to assay soil aminopeptidases, a systematic literature review was conducted. We identified 61 studies that were nearly all limited to measuring leucine and/or glycine aminopeptidases, despite the commercial availability of at least six other aminopeptidase-specific <i>p</i>NA substrates. Assay parameters of scale (slurry vs. direct incubations), matrix type, buffer pH, substrate concentration, assay duration and temperature, termination, and colorimetry indicated a lack of standardization and a confusion of <i>p</i>NA with <i>p</i>NP substrates despite important differences in abiotic hydrolysis and absorbance maxima. Future studies should systematically evaluate and standardize these parameters and assess the sensitivity of other amino acid-specific aminopeptidases to carbon (C), N, and sulfur (S) cycling.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20079","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42447096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
How can we estimate optimum fertilizer rates with accuracy and precision? 我们如何准确地估计最佳施肥量?
IF 2.6 4区 农林科学 Pub Date : 2022-06-02 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.20075
Fernando E. Miguez, Hanna Poffenbarger

For decades, agronomists have invested time and resources to identify the optimum nitrogen (N) rates for cereal crops. The most common method for estimating the agronomic optimum N rate (AONR) is to design a field experiment with several N fertilizer rates and fit a regression model to the yield observations. Here, we concentrate on its accuracy and precision given choices of experimental design and statistical analysis. Our first finding is that the choice of functional form has a large agronomic effect on the estimate of the AONR, and this depends on the data-generating model. Our second finding is that improving the precision and accuracy of AONR estimates will demand an increase in the number of N rates and replications. Finally, we propose that using either the best-fitting model or a weighted model is preferable to always choosing either the linear-plateau (negative bias) or quadratic-plateau (positive bias) models.

几十年来,农学家一直投入时间和资源来确定谷物作物的最佳氮(N)含量。估算农艺最佳施氮量(AONR)最常用的方法是设计一个具有几种施氮量的田间试验,并根据产量观测结果拟合回归模型。在这里,我们集中讨论了在实验设计和统计分析的选择下它的准确性和精密度。我们的第一个发现是,功能形式的选择对AONR的估计有很大的农艺影响,这取决于数据生成模型。我们的第二个发现是,提高AONR估计的精度和准确性将需要增加N速率和重复次数。最后,我们提出,使用最佳拟合模型或加权模型比总是选择线性平台(负偏差)或二次平台(正偏差)模型更可取。
{"title":"How can we estimate optimum fertilizer rates with accuracy and precision?","authors":"Fernando E. Miguez,&nbsp;Hanna Poffenbarger","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20075","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.20075","url":null,"abstract":"<p>For decades, agronomists have invested time and resources to identify the optimum nitrogen (N) rates for cereal crops. The most common method for estimating the agronomic optimum N rate (AONR) is to design a field experiment with several N fertilizer rates and fit a regression model to the yield observations. Here, we concentrate on its accuracy and precision given choices of experimental design and statistical analysis. Our first finding is that the choice of functional form has a large agronomic effect on the estimate of the AONR, and this depends on the data-generating model. Our second finding is that improving the precision and accuracy of AONR estimates will demand an increase in the number of N rates and replications. Finally, we propose that using either the best-fitting model or a weighted model is preferable to always choosing either the linear-plateau (negative bias) or quadratic-plateau (positive bias) models.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20075","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46443744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Seed size variability has implications for achieving cover cropping goals 种子大小变异性对实现覆盖种植目标具有影响
IF 2.6 4区 农林科学 Pub Date : 2022-05-30 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.20080
Natalie P. Lounsbury, Nicholas D. Warren, Julia Hobbie, Heather Darby, Matthew R. Ryan, David A. Mortensen, Richard G. Smith

It is common to use mass-based units (e.g., kg ha–1) to describe cover crop seeding rates. However, this convention obscures important information about seed size and resulting plant density in the field, which may be linked to cover crop performance and ecosystem services. Seed counts of 27 lots of commercially available winter rye (Secale cereale L.) spanned a wide range from 28,000 to 50,000 seeds kg–1. If the lots with the lowest and highest seed counts were seeded at a common mass-based seeding rate of 125 kg ha–1, it would result in a nearly twofold difference in density-based seeding rate, or 3.0 and 5.6 million live seeds ha–1. Including density-based metrics such as live seeds per area and resulting in-field plant density in research will help advance our understanding of cover crop management, and these efforts will make it easier for farmers and policymakers to tailor cover cropping practices for specific goals.

通常使用以质量为基础的单位(例如,kg ha-1)来描述覆盖作物的播种率。然而,这种惯例掩盖了种子大小和由此产生的田间植物密度的重要信息,这些信息可能与覆盖作物的生产性能和生态系统服务有关。27批市售的冬季黑麦(Secale cereale L.)种子数量从28,000到50,000粒/ kg不等。如果种子数量最少和最高的地块以125 kg ha-1的共同质量播种率播种,则基于密度的播种率相差近两倍,即300万和560万粒活种子ha-1。在研究中纳入基于密度的指标,如每面积活种和由此产生的田间植物密度,将有助于增进我们对覆盖作物管理的理解,这些努力将使农民和决策者更容易为特定目标量身定制覆盖作物实践。
{"title":"Seed size variability has implications for achieving cover cropping goals","authors":"Natalie P. Lounsbury,&nbsp;Nicholas D. Warren,&nbsp;Julia Hobbie,&nbsp;Heather Darby,&nbsp;Matthew R. Ryan,&nbsp;David A. Mortensen,&nbsp;Richard G. Smith","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20080","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.20080","url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is common to use mass-based units (e.g., kg ha<sup>–1</sup>) to describe cover crop seeding rates. However, this convention obscures important information about seed size and resulting plant density in the field, which may be linked to cover crop performance and ecosystem services. Seed counts of 27 lots of commercially available winter rye (<i>Secale cereale</i> L.) spanned a wide range from 28,000 to 50,000 seeds kg<sup>–1</sup>. If the lots with the lowest and highest seed counts were seeded at a common mass-based seeding rate of 125 kg ha<sup>–1</sup>, it would result in a nearly twofold difference in density-based seeding rate, or 3.0 and 5.6 million live seeds ha<sup>–1</sup>. Including density-based metrics such as live seeds per area and resulting in-field plant density in research will help advance our understanding of cover crop management, and these efforts will make it easier for farmers and policymakers to tailor cover cropping practices for specific goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20080","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"51338370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Can soil health explain grain quality? A case study of a corn field in Texas 土壤健康能解释粮食质量吗?得克萨斯州玉米地的案例研究
IF 2.6 4区 农林科学 Pub Date : 2022-05-26 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.20078
Kabindra Adhikari, Douglas R. Smith, Chad Hajda, Phillip R. Owens

Studies show a strong relationship between soil health and crop yield, but those relating soil health and grain quality are limited. We studied the relationship between soil health and grain protein and oil content from a corn (Zea mays L.) field in Texas. Protein and oil content data were collected in the field with a CropScan monitor. Soil health values were measured at 202 locations using the Haney Soil Health Tool. We first mapped protein and oil content using apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) and 14 terrain attributes as predictors, and we then quantified the relationship with data from sample locations. Soil health was positively correlated with protein and oil content, but the relationship was rather weak. Soil health accounted for up to 13% of the variability in protein (p < .001) and between 2 and 17% in oil content (p < .1) depending on soil map unit. Their spatial distribution was mostly influenced by elevation, ECa, and wetness index. We do not recommend estimating grain protein and oil content with the Haney Soil Health Tool; however, we suggest investigating such relationship across different soil and agronomic conditions for further verification.

研究表明,土壤健康与作物产量之间存在密切关系,但与土壤健康和粮食质量相关的研究有限。我们研究了德克萨斯州玉米田土壤健康与谷物蛋白质和油脂含量之间的关系。蛋白质和油含量数据是用CropScan监测仪在现场收集的。使用Haney土壤健康工具对202个地点的土壤健康值进行了测量。我们首先使用表观电导率(ECa)和14个地形属性作为预测因子绘制蛋白质和石油含量图,然后量化与样本位置数据的关系。土壤健康与蛋白质和油脂含量呈正相关,但相关性较弱。土壤健康占蛋白质变异性的13%(p<.001),含油量的2%至17%(p<.1),具体取决于土壤图单位。它们的空间分布主要受海拔、ECa和湿度指数的影响。我们不建议使用哈尼土壤健康工具来估计谷物蛋白质和油脂含量;然而,我们建议在不同的土壤和农艺条件下调查这种关系,以便进一步验证。
{"title":"Can soil health explain grain quality? A case study of a corn field in Texas","authors":"Kabindra Adhikari,&nbsp;Douglas R. Smith,&nbsp;Chad Hajda,&nbsp;Phillip R. Owens","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20078","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.20078","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Studies show a strong relationship between soil health and crop yield, but those relating soil health and grain quality are limited. We studied the relationship between soil health and grain protein and oil content from a corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) field in Texas. Protein and oil content data were collected in the field with a CropScan monitor. Soil health values were measured at 202 locations using the Haney Soil Health Tool. We first mapped protein and oil content using apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) and 14 terrain attributes as predictors, and we then quantified the relationship with data from sample locations. Soil health was positively correlated with protein and oil content, but the relationship was rather weak. Soil health accounted for up to 13% of the variability in protein (<i>p</i> &lt; .001) and between 2 and 17% in oil content (<i>p</i> &lt; .1) depending on soil map unit. Their spatial distribution was mostly influenced by elevation, ECa, and wetness index. We do not recommend estimating grain protein and oil content with the Haney Soil Health Tool; however, we suggest investigating such relationship across different soil and agronomic conditions for further verification.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20078","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44917131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Soil health within transitions from irrigation to limited irrigation and dryland management 从灌溉过渡到有限灌溉和旱地管理的土壤健康
IF 2.6 4区 农林科学 Pub Date : 2022-05-16 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.20077
Krishna B. Bhandari, Veronica Acosta-Martínez, Lumarie Pérez-Guzmán, Charles P. West

The decline in groundwater supply in the Texas High Plains is forcing some growers to convert center-pivot irrigated cropland to dryland production. Transitioning toward reduced water input can lead to declines in soil health. We assessed short-term changes in soil health indicators in two transition scenarios: (a) from high irrigation method to low irrigation method (center pivot to subsurface drip) and (b) from high irrigation method to dryland (center pivot to dryland), in comparison to continuous center-pivot management. We monitored changes in chemical and biological indicators in four fields for each transition scenario and in three pivot-irrigated fields. There were declines in soil water content, potassium (K), sodium (Na), and soil organic carbon with transition from irrigation to reduced irrigation and dryland. Severe drought in the final year revealed reduced amounts of multi-enzyme activities, total ester-linked fatty acid methyl ester (EL-FAME), and total fungi. Transitioning to low water-input management in this environment complicates efforts to maintain microbial components of soil health. Longer-term comparisons are needed to detect slow changes in soil health indicators on producers’ fields.

得克萨斯州高平原地下水供应的减少迫使一些种植者将中心灌溉农田转为旱地生产。向减少水输入过渡可能会导致土壤健康状况下降。我们评估了两种过渡情景下土壤健康指标的短期变化:(a)从高灌溉方法到低灌溉方法(中心枢轴到地下滴灌),以及(b)与连续中心枢轴管理相比,从高灌溉方式到旱地(中心枢轴至旱地)。我们监测了每种过渡情景下四块田地和三块枢轴灌溉田地的化学和生物指标变化。随着从灌溉向减少灌溉和旱地的过渡,土壤含水量、钾(K)、钠(Na)和土壤有机碳都有所下降。最后一年的严重干旱显示多酶活性、总酯连接脂肪酸甲酯(EL‐FAME)和总真菌数量减少。在这种环境中向低水输入管理过渡,使维持土壤健康的微生物成分的工作变得复杂。需要进行长期比较,以发现生产者田地土壤健康指标的缓慢变化。
{"title":"Soil health within transitions from irrigation to limited irrigation and dryland management","authors":"Krishna B. Bhandari,&nbsp;Veronica Acosta-Martínez,&nbsp;Lumarie Pérez-Guzmán,&nbsp;Charles P. West","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20077","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.20077","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The decline in groundwater supply in the Texas High Plains is forcing some growers to convert center-pivot irrigated cropland to dryland production. Transitioning toward reduced water input can lead to declines in soil health. We assessed short-term changes in soil health indicators in two transition scenarios: (a) from high irrigation method to low irrigation method (center pivot to subsurface drip) and (b) from high irrigation method to dryland (center pivot to dryland), in comparison to continuous center-pivot management. We monitored changes in chemical and biological indicators in four fields for each transition scenario and in three pivot-irrigated fields. There were declines in soil water content, potassium (K), sodium (Na), and soil organic carbon with transition from irrigation to reduced irrigation and dryland. Severe drought in the final year revealed reduced amounts of multi-enzyme activities, total ester-linked fatty acid methyl ester (EL-FAME), and total fungi. Transitioning to low water-input management in this environment complicates efforts to maintain microbial components of soil health. Longer-term comparisons are needed to detect slow changes in soil health indicators on producers’ fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20077","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46874839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Quantitative comparison of the storage protein distribution in glandless and glanded cottonseeds 无腺体棉籽与有腺体棉籽贮藏蛋白分布的定量比较
IF 2.6 4区 农林科学 Pub Date : 2022-05-11 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.20076
Zhongqi He, Dunhua Zhang, Christopher P. Mattison

Glanded (Gd) cottonseed (Gossypium hirsutum L.) contains scattered gossypol glands. Glandless (Gl) cottonseed is a new type of seed containing only trace levels of gossypol. This work quantitatively compared the content and migration pattern of Gd and Gl protein isolates. Both protein samples were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-gel electrophoresis, and the protein gel bands were separated into seven partitions for peptide mass spectroscopic analysis. While multiple peptide fragments (isoformers) of vicilin and legumin proteins were present in both samples, the percentage of vicilins in total seed protein was higher in Gd (74.9%) than in Gl (63.4%). In contrast, legumin proteins were more abundant in Gl (30.4%) than Gd (23.6%). Minor protein components such as lipid-related oleosins and vicilin-like antimicrobial peptides 2-2 were also observed at a relatively higher incidence in Gl compared with Gd, potentially reflecting a need for increased protein-related defense capability in the absence of gossypol against natural predators or adverse growth environment.

带腺体的棉子(Gossypium hirsutum L.)含有分散的棉酚腺体。无腺体(Gl)棉籽是一种仅含微量棉酚的新型棉籽。本工作定量比较了Gd和Gl分离蛋白的含量和迁移模式。对两种蛋白质样品进行十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)凝胶电泳,并将蛋白质凝胶带分为七个部分进行肽质谱分析。虽然在两个样品中都存在vicilin和legumin蛋白的多个肽片段(异构体),但vicilin在总种子蛋白中的百分比在Gd中(74.9%)高于在Gl中(63.4%)。相反,legumin蛋白在Gl(30.4%)中比Gd(23.6%)更丰富。与Gd相比,在Gl中也观察到次要蛋白质成分,如脂质相关的油蛋白和vicilin样抗菌肽2‐2的发生率相对较高,这可能反映了在缺乏棉酚的情况下,需要提高蛋白质相关防御能力,以对抗天敌或不利的生长环境。
{"title":"Quantitative comparison of the storage protein distribution in glandless and glanded cottonseeds","authors":"Zhongqi He,&nbsp;Dunhua Zhang,&nbsp;Christopher P. Mattison","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20076","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.20076","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Glanded (Gd) cottonseed (<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i> L.) contains scattered gossypol glands. Glandless (Gl) cottonseed is a new type of seed containing only trace levels of gossypol. This work quantitatively compared the content and migration pattern of Gd and Gl protein isolates. Both protein samples were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-gel electrophoresis, and the protein gel bands were separated into seven partitions for peptide mass spectroscopic analysis. While multiple peptide fragments (isoformers) of vicilin and legumin proteins were present in both samples, the percentage of vicilins in total seed protein was higher in Gd (74.9%) than in Gl (63.4%). In contrast, legumin proteins were more abundant in Gl (30.4%) than Gd (23.6%). Minor protein components such as lipid-related oleosins and vicilin-like antimicrobial peptides 2-2 were also observed at a relatively higher incidence in Gl compared with Gd, potentially reflecting a need for increased protein-related defense capability in the absence of gossypol against natural predators or adverse growth environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20076","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49236068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Hybrid breeding and cultivar diversity in rice production in China 中国水稻生产中的杂交育种与品种多样性
IF 2.6 4区 农林科学 Pub Date : 2022-05-10 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.20074
Min Huang

This study determined the effect of hybrid breeding on cultivar diversity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) production in China. The results showed that hybrid breeding led to increases in the Shannon index of cultivar diversity by 29–184% during the period 2011–2015 compared with the period 1986–1990 for 10 major hybrid rice-producing provinces in China. There was a significant exponential relationship between the Shannon index of cultivar diversity and the number of hybrid cultivars and the total number of cultivars across the 10 provinces and the two 5-yr periods. The results of this study also demonstrate that hybrid rice breeding resulted in a cultivar diversity that came close to saturation in some provinces, such as Anhui, Hunan, Jiangxi, and Sichuan, and highlight the urgent need for a reconsideration of the development of hybrid rice industrialization in China to avoid wasting resources caused by overbreeding.

研究了杂交育种对我国水稻品种多样性的影响。结果表明,2011年至2015年期间,与1986年至1990年期间相比,杂交育种使中国10个主要杂交水稻生产省份的香农品种多样性指数增加了29–184%。在10个省和两个5年期内,品种多样性的香农指数与杂交品种数量和品种总数之间存在显著的指数关系。本研究结果还表明,在安徽、湖南、江西和四川等一些省份,杂交水稻育种导致品种多样性接近饱和,并强调迫切需要重新考虑中国杂交水稻产业化的发展,以避免过度繁殖造成资源浪费。
{"title":"Hybrid breeding and cultivar diversity in rice production in China","authors":"Min Huang","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20074","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ael2.20074","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study determined the effect of hybrid breeding on cultivar diversity in rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.) production in China. The results showed that hybrid breeding led to increases in the Shannon index of cultivar diversity by 29–184% during the period 2011–2015 compared with the period 1986–1990 for 10 major hybrid rice-producing provinces in China. There was a significant exponential relationship between the Shannon index of cultivar diversity and the number of hybrid cultivars and the total number of cultivars across the 10 provinces and the two 5-yr periods. The results of this study also demonstrate that hybrid rice breeding resulted in a cultivar diversity that came close to saturation in some provinces, such as Anhui, Hunan, Jiangxi, and Sichuan, and highlight the urgent need for a reconsideration of the development of hybrid rice industrialization in China to avoid wasting resources caused by overbreeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20074","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44067070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Thanks to our 2021 reviewers 感谢我们2021年的评审员
IF 2.6 4区 农林科学 Pub Date : 2022-04-29 DOI: 10.1002/ael2.20072

Maintaining the editorial standards of a scientific journal is an important responsibility because the publications of a society are one of its major services to its members. This task can only be accomplished with the advice of a large number of colleagues who are invited to review manuscripts. Their critical comments and helpful suggestions have played a major part in making Agricultural & Environmental Letters a success. The members of the Agricultural & Environmental Letters Editorial Board express their thanks to all those scientists who reviewed manuscripts in 2021. We extend our apologies and thanks to those reviewers whose names have been inadvertently omitted from this list.

Adeli, Ardeshir, USDA, United States

Akula, Umakanth, ICAR-Indian Institute of Millets Research, Hyderabad, India

Archer, David, USDA-ARS-NGPRL, Mandan, North Dakota, United States

Arzani, Ahmad, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran

Barcellos, Diego

Barnes, Ed, Cotton Inc., Cary, North Carolina, United States

Berti, Marisol, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Bir, Courtney, Oklahoma State University System, Stillwater, Oklahoma, United States

Buda, Anthony, USDA-ARS, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States

Chatterjee, Amitava, Oxford, Mississippi, United States

Culman, Steven, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio, United States

Daigh, Aaron, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, United States

De Guzman, Christian, University of Arkansas System, Stuttgart, Arkansas, United States

Delhom, Chris, USDA-ARS Mid South Area, United States

Dick, Warren, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, United States

Dorau, Kristof, Universität zu Köln

Eagle, Alison, Environmental Defense Fund, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Feleke, Shiferaw, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania

Franzluebbers, Alan, USDA, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Ganie, Zahoor

Goos, R., NDSU, Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Govindasamy, Prabhu, Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, India

Graham, Jennifer, US Geological Survey Northeast Region, United States

Grusak, Mike, USDA-ARS Plains Area, Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Guillen-Portal, Fernando, Texas A and M University College Station, College Station, Texas, United States

Haden, Ryan, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, United States

Hadrich, Joleen, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States

Hall, Clifford

He, Zhongqi, USDA-ARS, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Houser, Matthew, Indiana University System, Bloomington, Indiana, United States

Huggins, Trevis, USDA-ARS Southeast Area, Stuttgart, Arkansas, United States

<
保持科学期刊的编辑标准是一项重要的责任,因为一个学会的出版物是其为会员提供的主要服务之一。这项任务只有在大量受邀审阅手稿的同事的建议下才能完成。他们的批评性意见和有益的建议对我国农业科学技术的发展起到了重要作用;《环保快报》获得成功。农业及农业组织的成员;《环境快报》编委会感谢所有在2021年审阅手稿的科学家。我们向那些名字被无意中从这份名单中省略的评审员表示歉意和感谢。Adeli,Ardeshir,美国农业部,美国Kula,Umakanth,ICAR-Indian Millets Research Institute,Hyderabad,IndiaArcher,David,USDA-ARS-NGPRL,Mandan,North Dakota,美国阿尔扎尼,Ahmad,伊斯法罕理工大学,Isfahan,伊朗伊斯兰共和国Barcellos,DiegoBarnes,Ed,Cotton股份有限公司,Cary,North Carolina,United States,美国北达科他州比尔、考特尼、俄克拉荷马州立大学系统、斯蒂尔沃特、俄克拉何马州布达、安东尼、USDA-ARS、宾夕法尼亚州大学公园、美国查特吉、阿米塔瓦、牛津、密西西比州、美国库曼、史蒂文、俄亥俄州农业研究与发展中心、俄亥俄州伍斯特,美国德古兹曼,克里斯蒂安,阿肯色大学系统,斯图加特,阿肯色州,美国德霍姆,克里斯,USDA-ARS中南部地区,美国迪克,沃伦,俄亥俄州立大学,伍斯特,俄亥俄州,美国多劳,克里斯托夫,科恩伊格尔大学,艾莉森,环境保护基金,北卡罗来纳州罗利,坦桑尼亚联合共和国达累斯萨拉姆国际热带农业研究所Franzluebers,Alan,美国农业部,北卡罗来纳州罗利市,美国Ganie,ZahoorGoos,R.,NDSU,北达科他州法戈,美国Govindasamy,Prabhu,印度草原和饲料研究所,Jhansi,IndiaGraham,Jennifer,美国地质调查局东北地区,美国Grusak,Mike,USDA-ARS平原地区,法戈,北达科他州,美国Guillen Portal,Fernando,德克萨斯州农工大学学院站,德克萨斯州学院站,美国哈登,瑞安,俄亥俄州立大学,俄亥俄州伍斯特,美国哈德里希,乔琳,明尼苏达大学,明尼苏达州圣保罗,美国霍尔,CliffordHe,中启,USDA-ARS,新奥尔良,路易斯安那州,美国Houser,Matthew,印第安纳大学系统,印第安纳州布卢明顿,美国哈金斯,特雷维斯,USDA-ARS东南地区,斯图加特,阿肯色州,美国Jha,Gaurav,加州大学戴维斯,加利福尼亚州,美国Jones,Jessica L.,美国食品,美国Jungers,Jacob,明尼苏达大学,圣保罗,明尼苏达州,美国,康奈尔大学,伊萨卡,纽约,美国Kiniry,Jim,USDA-ARS,得克萨斯州坦普尔,美国Koehler Cole,Katja,内布拉斯加大学林肯,内布拉斯加州,美国Kolka,Randy,美国农业部林务局,大急流城,明尼苏达州,美国Kusi,Nana,弗吉尼亚州立大学,弗吉尼亚州彼得堡,美国Lamba,Jasmeet,奥本大学,阿拉巴马州奥本,美国Lehman,R.,USDA-ARS,布鲁金斯,南达科他州,美国Lewis,Katie,德克萨斯A&amp;M AgriLife Research,Halfway,Texas,UnitedStatesLi,ChenhuiLi,XiaofeiLindsey,Alexander,Ohio State University,Columbus,Ohio,UnitedStates Lobry de Bruyn,Lisa Malone,Robert,USDA-ARS,Ames,Iowa,UnitedStatesMcKnight,BenjemanMiranda,Carrie,North Dakota State University,Fargo,North Da科塔州,Randy,明尼苏达大学扩展分校,美国明尼苏达州摩尔黑德。’Brien,Peter,USDA-ARS国家农业与环境实验室,美国爱荷华州埃姆斯。Reja,Fernando Panchbai,Ajay,国际水稻研究所,内罗毕,KenyaPlastina,Alejandro,爱荷华州州立大学,艾奥瓦州埃姆斯。Power,Rebecca,威斯康星大学,威斯康星州麦迪逊,美国邱,湖北省粮食产业协同创新中心,中国Rabenhorst,Marty Ray,Ram,Prairie View A&amp;M大学,Prairie View,德克萨斯州,美国Ruark,Matthew,威斯康星大学,威斯康星麦迪逊,美国Ruiz Diaz,Dorivar,堪萨斯州立大学,曼哈顿,堪萨斯州,美国Sauvadet,MarieSchlossberg,Maxim,宾夕法尼亚州立大学。 ,宾夕法尼亚大学帕克分校,美国森古普塔,阿迪蒂,亚利桑那大学,亚利桑那州图森市,美国辛,哈里,Fort Valley州立大学,Fort谷,佐治亚州,美国陶,海鹰,华盛顿州立大学,华盛顿州普尔曼,美国迪德尔,埃苏巴勒,Debre Markos大学农业与自然资源学院,美国联邦农业与自然科学部,美国密西西比州Thompson,Laura,内布拉斯加大学林肯分校,美国内布拉斯加福尔斯市Unruh,Bryan,佛罗里达大学Jay,佛罗里达州,美国von Haden,Adam,伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校,伊利诺伊州厄巴纳,美国White,Paul,美国农业部农业研究服务中心,路易斯安那州侯马,美国Wills,SkyeYousef,Lina,阿拉伯联合酋长国马斯达尔市马斯达尔科技学院张,海林,俄克拉荷马州立大学,美国俄克拉荷马州斯蒂尔沃特
{"title":"Thanks to our 2021 reviewers","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20072","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Maintaining the editorial standards of a scientific journal is an important responsibility because the publications of a society are one of its major services to its members. This task can only be accomplished with the advice of a large number of colleagues who are invited to review manuscripts. Their critical comments and helpful suggestions have played a major part in making <i>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Letters</i> a success. The members of the <i>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Letters</i> Editorial Board express their thanks to all those scientists who reviewed manuscripts in 2021. We extend our apologies and thanks to those reviewers whose names have been inadvertently omitted from this list.</p><p>Adeli, Ardeshir, USDA, United States</p><p>Akula, Umakanth, ICAR-Indian Institute of Millets Research, Hyderabad, India</p><p>Archer, David, USDA-ARS-NGPRL, Mandan, North Dakota, United States</p><p>Arzani, Ahmad, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran</p><p>Barcellos, Diego</p><p>Barnes, Ed, Cotton Inc., Cary, North Carolina, United States</p><p>Berti, Marisol, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, United States</p><p>Bir, Courtney, Oklahoma State University System, Stillwater, Oklahoma, United States</p><p>Buda, Anthony, USDA-ARS, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States</p><p>Chatterjee, Amitava, Oxford, Mississippi, United States</p><p>Culman, Steven, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio, United States</p><p>Daigh, Aaron, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, United States</p><p>De Guzman, Christian, University of Arkansas System, Stuttgart, Arkansas, United States</p><p>Delhom, Chris, USDA-ARS Mid South Area, United States</p><p>Dick, Warren, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, United States</p><p>Dorau, Kristof, Universität zu Köln</p><p>Eagle, Alison, Environmental Defense Fund, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States</p><p>Feleke, Shiferaw, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania</p><p>Franzluebbers, Alan, USDA, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States</p><p>Ganie, Zahoor</p><p>Goos, R., NDSU, Fargo, North Dakota, United States</p><p>Govindasamy, Prabhu, Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, India</p><p>Graham, Jennifer, US Geological Survey Northeast Region, United States</p><p>Grusak, Mike, USDA-ARS Plains Area, Fargo, North Dakota, United States</p><p>Guillen-Portal, Fernando, Texas A and M University College Station, College Station, Texas, United States</p><p>Haden, Ryan, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, United States</p><p>Hadrich, Joleen, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States</p><p>Hall, Clifford</p><p>He, Zhongqi, USDA-ARS, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States</p><p>Houser, Matthew, Indiana University System, Bloomington, Indiana, United States</p><p>Huggins, Trevis, USDA-ARS Southeast Area, Stuttgart, Arkansas, United States</p><","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20072","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71985478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Agricultural & Environmental Letters
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1