Discretionary lane-changing behavior, a prevalent expressway phenomenon, necessitates driver-centric analysis. Existing studies often assume perfect rationality, neglecting bounded rationality. This work divides decisions into perception and judgment phases. For perception, stated preference surveys and data-driven methods evaluate how drivers’ attention allocation and cognitive limits shape decisions. During judgment, cumulative prospect theory with logistic regression models heterogeneous reference points, achieving >90% accuracy—10% higher than expected utility models. Sensitivity analysis reveals: 1) 17% increased lane-changing propensity when risk aversion falls below loss sensitivity; 2) Loss aversion dominance in suboptimal lanes; 3) Systematic underestimation of high-probability events via probability distortion. These results quantitatively establish bounded rationality’s cognitive mechanisms in driving, offering theoretical foundations for human-machine collaborative systems and traffic management strategies addressing cognitive constraints. The dual-phase framework enhances behavioral realism while maintaining computational tractability in driving simulations.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
