Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie最新文献

Background: Geriatric patients requiring rehabilitation and admitted to short-term care after an acute inpatient hospital stay seldom receive rehabilitative services later. Rehabilitative short-term care (REKUP) supplements short-term care with rehabilitative measures, aiming to prevent functional restrictions and long-term care.

Study objective: To conduct a cost and cost-effectiveness analyses of REKUP and provide data for a nationwide rollout.

Material and methods: A non-randomized controlled prospective study was carried out. The intervention group (IG) was paired 1:2 with a control group (KG), resulting in the formation of three collectives with follow-up periods of either 30, 90 or 180 days (each with IG and KG). Using administrative claims data from the AOK Baden-Württemberg, the mean total costs from the perspective of the health insurance were calculated. A potential impact of the intervention on costs was analyzed using the difference in differences approach.

Results: The analysis comprised 129 patients (IG 43; KG 86). During the follow-up periods, the IG presented higher rates of rehabilitation and lower rates of long-term care and mortality. Regarding costs, no statistically significant differences were found between the IG and KG in any of the three collectives. For nursing care and medication costs, costs were significantly higher in the follow-up period for the KG, whereas costs for rehabilitation were significantly higher for the IG (p < 0.001).

Discussion: Patients receiving REKUP utilize rehabilitation services more often and have a lower likelihood of requiring nursing care or dying with no statistically significant differences in costs. There are potential advantages of REKUP in the target population, which warrant further investigation due to methodological limitations.

The enormous potential of cardiovascular prevention in terms of expanding the life span and health span is presently nowhere near being realized. The five classical cardiovascular risk factors body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol, tobacco smoking, and diabetes mellitus account for more than half of the cases of incident cardiovascular diseases. Cardiovascular prevention is also effective and adequate in seemingly healthy individuals aged 70 years or above, although the association of several cardiovascular risk factors with cardiovascular diseases is less pronounced in old age. The cardiovascular risk of seemingly healthy persons aged 70 years or above can validly be determined using the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation-Older Persons (SCORE2-OP), leading to risk-adjusted clear treatment recommendations. National and international guidelines advocate individualized cardiovascular prevention in several domains including diet, physical activity and risk factor management through to old age.

Cognitive disorders are multifaceted and the range of neuropsychological instruments is correspondingly extensive; however, most examiners have to limit themselves to a small selection in order to master them safely. In geriatric patients the various forms and stages of dementia dominate. Delirium must be distinguished from these as an acute life-threatening event. The personal and external medical history as well as clinical observation are the first steps in the assessment of cognition; the selection of test procedures is graduated and bears the patient's benefit in mind. When compiling a toolbox for use in one's own field of work, in addition to instruments focusing on different degrees of severity, alternatives should also be considered for use in the presence of comorbidities that reduce the validity (visual, hearing and fine motor disorders) and the examination situation should be taken into account.

Background: The presence of frailty in older patients increases the risk for adverse health events and for a loss of independence. Measures for the prevention of this geriatric syndrome should be incorporated into routine healthcare.

Objective: What types of interventions could be effective in the prevention of frailty and how can preventive strategies be successfully implemented?

Method: Narrative review article.

Results: The concept of frailty is multidimensional and potential starting points for a prevention of frailty can be found within different dimensions (e.g., dimensions of physical activity and nutrition, psychosocial dimension). Epidemiological analyses have identified factors that increase or decrease the risk for becoming frail. Evidence from randomized controlled trials that examined the effectiveness of specific interventions in the prevention of frailty is still limited. Based on the available data, interventions using physical exercise appear to be effective in preventing frailty. In primary care in Germany the frailty status of older patients is not yet routinely recorded, which impedes the identification of patients at risk (patients with pre-frailty) and the implementation of targeted preventive strategies. The Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) concept of the World Health Organization offers a potential approach to prevent frailty and to promote healthy ageing within the population.

Conclusion: The prevention of frailty is possible and reasonable. Comprehensive and targeted preventive strategies are yet to be implemented.

Background: Recognizing functional deficits early and counteracting them with a multimodal treatment concept is one of the most important tasks of general practitioners, who are usually the primary medical contact for geriatric patients.

Aim: Illustration of strategies for a biopsychosocial assessment of geriatric patients and for the creation of individually adapted prevention concepts in general practice.

Material and methods: Literature research on the theoretical background of the most important prevention approaches for geriatric patients as well as considerations on their relevance and implementation in daily practice.

Results: For geriatric patients prevention measures should be implemented simultaneously on all four prevention levels. The main objective is promoting physical and mental exercise. The risks of immobility, depression, cognitive decline, malnutrition and, last but not least, polypharmacy are of particular importance.

Conclusion: Geriatric patients represent a very heterogeneous group. In order to be able to take individual preventive action, a multidimensional assessment of key factors for maintaining functionality and relative health is required, even though chronic conditions may already exist.

Background: Geriatric patients in subacute inpatient care (SC) with rehabilitation needs after hospitalization seldom utilize rehabilitative services and are often transitioned to long-term care (LTC), suggesting that their care in SC can be optimized.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitative subacute inpatient care (REKUP) in improving the care of geriatric patients in SC with rehabilitation needs after hospitalization.

Methods: The study was conducted as a nonrandomized intervention trial with an historical control group (CG). The intervention group (IG: n = 49) received REKUP (activating therapeutic care, functional rehabilitative therapy, psychosocial services, medical care), while the CG (n = 57) received usual care during SC. Primary outcomes were transition to inpatient rehabilitation, home, and LTC, deteriorated care setting, care level, and mortality within 3 months after SC. Secondary outcomes were functional, motor and psychological variables.

Results: The transition rate to inpatient rehabilitation (82% vs. 37%) and home (86% vs. 65%) was higher (p < 0.05) in the IG than in the CG. The proportion of persons utilizing LTC (12% vs. 35%) and with deteriorated care setting (35% vs. 60%) was lower (p < 0.01) in the IG than in the CG. The Barthel Index, visual analogue scale of the EQ-5D, and numerical pain scale improved (p < 0.05) during the SC stay in the IG but not in the CG.

Discussion: REKUP as a new care model for SC promotes the transition to inpatient rehabilitation, reduces the utilization of LTC and improves the chances of returning home and achieving greater independence in geriatric patients with rehabilitation needs after hospitalization.

Background: Orthogeriatric comanagement of older patients with hip fractures has been proven to provide significant benefits concerning functional status, readmissions, nursing home placement, in-hospital complications and mortality. Medication management in older individuals is a cornerstone in orthogeriatric comanagement. The aim of the study was to analyze the extent of overprescription and undertreatment in older trauma patients.

Methods: Personal and medical data of consecutively admitted older trauma patients were analyzed. Evaluation of medication was conducted according to the Fit fOR The Aged (FORTA) criteria. Data were retrieved from an ongoing observational study on the incidence of delirium in surgical patients.

Results: A total of 492 patients were enrolled. There were 374 cases of overprescription and 575 cases of undertreatment. Only 78 (16%) patients had neither overprescription nor undertreatment on admission. Overprescription and undertreatment were most prevalent in cardiovascular disease. Undertreatment was most prevalent concerning osteoporosis. The number of prescribed drugs correlated with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (r = 0.478, p < 0.001), age (r = 0.122; p < 0.01), anticholinergic burden (r = 0.528, p < 0.001), FORTA score (r = 0.352, p < 0.001), and overtreatment (r = 0.492, p < 0.001), but not with undertreatment. Undertreatment also correlated with age (r = 0.172, p < 0.001) and overtreatment (r = 0.364, p < 0.01). The FORTA score correlated significantly with age (r = 0.159, p < 0.001), anticholinergic burden (ACB) score (r = 0.496, p < 0.001), Katz index (r = -0.119, p < 0.01), IADL score (r = -0.243, p < 0.001), and clinical frailty scale (CFS, r = 0.23, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The high numbers of overprescription and undertreatment in older trauma patients underlines the need for orthogeriatric comanagement. Besides the evaluation of multimorbidity and geriatric problems, drug management is a core topic. Future studies should investigate the impact of medication management on outcome parameters such as quality of life, functional status, and mortality. A benefit can be expected.

The geriatric assessment is a basic requirement and a key quality parameter in geriatric care. An increasing number of older patients are presenting to emergency or central admission departments and discharge units in hospitals. For this reason, and in view of the time-critical decision-making requirements in this setting, digital applications of basic geriatric assessment data are becoming increasingly more important for the high-quality follow-up care of geriatric patients.