The One Health approach supports global health security by improving coordination, collaboration and communication at the human-animal-environment interface to address shared health threats such as zoonotic diseases, antimicrobial resistance, food safety and others. Over the past decade, country after country has implemented the One Health approach and demonstrated recognised benefits. However, in order to build sustainability of One Health in these efforts, One Health champions and implementers need to collect and provide government decision-makers with country-level data on One Health's impact to help justify policy decisions and resource allocations. Due to the broad, often seemingly all encompassing, nature of One Health in promoting synergies of multiple disciplines and sectors, the One Health community has faced difficulties in determining specific One Health impact indicators for formally evaluating One Health successes. In this paper, the author a) briefly reviews the ongoing commentary on the recognised benefits of the implementation of a One Health approach in the global health security context, b) discusses challenges in measuring the impact of One Health, and c) proposes possible solutions for evaluating the impact of One Health on global health security.
{"title":"Importance of a One Health approach in advancing global health security and the Sustainable Development Goals.","authors":"J. Sinclair","doi":"10.20506/rst.38.1.2949","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.38.1.2949","url":null,"abstract":"The One Health approach supports global health security by improving coordination, collaboration and communication at the human-animal-environment interface to address shared health threats such as zoonotic diseases, antimicrobial resistance, food safety and others. Over the past decade, country after country has implemented the One Health approach and demonstrated recognised benefits. However, in order to build sustainability of One Health in these efforts, One Health champions and implementers need to collect and provide government decision-makers with country-level data on One Health's impact to help justify policy decisions and resource allocations. Due to the broad, often seemingly all encompassing, nature of One Health in promoting synergies of multiple disciplines and sectors, the One Health community has faced difficulties in determining specific One Health impact indicators for formally evaluating One Health successes. In this paper, the author a) briefly reviews the ongoing commentary on the recognised benefits of the implementation of a One Health approach in the global health security context, b) discusses challenges in measuring the impact of One Health, and c) proposes possible solutions for evaluating the impact of One Health on global health security.","PeriodicalId":49596,"journal":{"name":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","volume":"15 1","pages":"145-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73650541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
H. T. Nguyen, H. T. Nguyen, T. T. Nguyen, M. Urabe, T. N. Pham, A. D. Dang, D. O. Afriyie, D. N. Tran, S. Otsu
Rabies is a fatal viral disease that causes an estimated 59,000 human deaths each year. The majority of these deaths occur in developing countries in Asia. Canine rabies is endemic to Vietnam, which is, however, moving towards the disease's elimination. Many countries, such as Vietnam, have invested tremendous resources in controlling rabies, highlighting the goal of regional and global elimination of this neglected disease. In Vietnam, rabies is recognised as one of five high-priority, zoonotic diseases by the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. Investment by the government and by international partners for rabies prevention and control has played a substantial role in reducing human rabies deaths from 404 cases in 1992 to 74 cases in 2017. The catalyst for this effort was the Prime Minister's creation of the National Rabies Program in 1996, which led to increased support and resources for rabies prevention and control. Interventions carried out since then include the expansion of post-exposure prophylaxis centres throughout the country, the introduction or revision of key legislation and guidelines, and improved multisectoral One Health collaboration. In addition, support from international partners, such as the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), the World Health Organization (WHO), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), has helped to increase awareness, manage dog populations more effectively, and improve Vietnam's surveillance and diagnostic capabilities. To pursue the goal of eliminating dog-mediated rabies in Vietnam, political commitment is crucial. Resources must be made available to enforce the regulations and guidelines that will enable Vietnam to achieve greater canine rabies vaccination coverage. In this paper, the authors provide an overview of the animal and human health systems in Vietnam, as well as past, current and future directions of rabies prevention and control.
{"title":"Progress towards rabies control and elimination in Vietnam.","authors":"H. T. Nguyen, H. T. Nguyen, T. T. Nguyen, M. Urabe, T. N. Pham, A. D. Dang, D. O. Afriyie, D. N. Tran, S. Otsu","doi":"10.20506/rst.38.1.2953","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.38.1.2953","url":null,"abstract":"Rabies is a fatal viral disease that causes an estimated 59,000 human deaths each year. The majority of these deaths occur in developing countries in Asia. Canine rabies is endemic to Vietnam, which is, however, moving towards the disease's elimination. Many countries, such as Vietnam, have invested tremendous resources in controlling rabies, highlighting the goal of regional and global elimination of this neglected disease. In Vietnam, rabies is recognised as one of five high-priority, zoonotic diseases by the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. Investment by the government and by international partners for rabies prevention and control has played a substantial role in reducing human rabies deaths from 404 cases in 1992 to 74 cases in 2017. The catalyst for this effort was the Prime Minister's creation of the National Rabies Program in 1996, which led to increased support and resources for rabies prevention and control. Interventions carried out since then include the expansion of post-exposure prophylaxis centres throughout the country, the introduction or revision of key legislation and guidelines, and improved multisectoral One Health collaboration. In addition, support from international partners, such as the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), the World Health Organization (WHO), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), has helped to increase awareness, manage dog populations more effectively, and improve Vietnam's surveillance and diagnostic capabilities. To pursue the goal of eliminating dog-mediated rabies in Vietnam, political commitment is crucial. Resources must be made available to enforce the regulations and guidelines that will enable Vietnam to achieve greater canine rabies vaccination coverage. In this paper, the authors provide an overview of the animal and human health systems in Vietnam, as well as past, current and future directions of rabies prevention and control.","PeriodicalId":49596,"journal":{"name":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","volume":"47 1","pages":"199-212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82100223","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
R. Tangwangvivat, K. Boonyo, W. Toanan, S. Muangnoichareon, S. Na Nan, S. Iamsirithaworn, O. Prasarnphanich
Within the last decade, One Health has gained momentum in government agencies, academic institutions, intergovernmental organisations and civil society organisations within Thailand. One Health is an approach of multisectoral and multidisciplinary collaboration that connects human, animal and environmental health sectors to improve the health of all. In 2014, the Coordinating Unit for One Health (CUOH), based within the Thai Ministry of Public Health, was officially established to serve as a focal point within Thailand for One Health collaboration both domestically and internationally. The unit's main functions are to share data, information and resources, and to support One Health activities within the country. The CUOH Steering Committee meets regularly to provide technical and administrative guidance on the functions and directions of the CUOH. A memorandum of understanding on One Health, signed in 2016 by seven Ministries and the Thai Red Cross Society, has strengthened One Health collaboration and provides a formalised channel through which the CUOH can facilitate activities across Ministries and with non-governmental agencies in Thailand.
{"title":"Promoting the One Health concept: Thai Coordinating Unit for One Health.","authors":"R. Tangwangvivat, K. Boonyo, W. Toanan, S. Muangnoichareon, S. Na Nan, S. Iamsirithaworn, O. Prasarnphanich","doi":"10.20506/rst.38.1.2959","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.38.1.2959","url":null,"abstract":"Within the last decade, One Health has gained momentum in government agencies, academic institutions, intergovernmental organisations and civil society organisations within Thailand. One Health is an approach of multisectoral and multidisciplinary collaboration that connects human, animal and environmental health sectors to improve the health of all. In 2014, the Coordinating Unit for One Health (CUOH), based within the Thai Ministry of Public Health, was officially established to serve as a focal point within Thailand for One Health collaboration both domestically and internationally. The unit's main functions are to share data, information and resources, and to support One Health activities within the country. The CUOH Steering Committee meets regularly to provide technical and administrative guidance on the functions and directions of the CUOH. A memorandum of understanding on One Health, signed in 2016 by seven Ministries and the Thai Red Cross Society, has strengthened One Health collaboration and provides a formalised channel through which the CUOH can facilitate activities across Ministries and with non-governmental agencies in Thailand.","PeriodicalId":49596,"journal":{"name":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","volume":"1 1","pages":"271-278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86496171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
K. Errecaborde, C. Rist, D. A. Travis, V. Ragan, T. Potter, A. Pekol, K. Pelican, T. Dutcher
In a review of the literature surrounding One Health, cross-boundary collaboration, the science of teams, and interdisciplinary health competencies, many individual disciplines, and in some cases multidisciplinary research teams, have looked at the scholarship of collaboration and arrived at remarkably similar conclusions as to which factors and competencies support effective collaboration. However, conclusions on how to effectively evaluate collaboration are consistently lacking across the literature reviewed. Although important advances have been made recently in the area of evaluating One Health operations and outcomes, there is an opportunity to develop process-based performance measures for One Health collaboration and teamwork. Synthesising work on collaborative performance evaluation across multiple disciplinary and sectoral lanes and levels of collaborative analysis, the authors argue that, in addition to outcome-based One Health evaluation, the evaluation of One Health processes needs to be further refined and 'team' effectiveness needs to be evaluated at all levels of the health system: individual, organisational and network.
{"title":"Evaluating One Health: the role of team science in multisectoral collaboration.","authors":"K. Errecaborde, C. Rist, D. A. Travis, V. Ragan, T. Potter, A. Pekol, K. Pelican, T. Dutcher","doi":"10.20506/rst.38.1.2960","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.38.1.2960","url":null,"abstract":"In a review of the literature surrounding One Health, cross-boundary collaboration, the science of teams, and interdisciplinary health competencies, many individual disciplines, and in some cases multidisciplinary research teams, have looked at the scholarship of collaboration and arrived at remarkably similar conclusions as to which factors and competencies support effective collaboration. However, conclusions on how to effectively evaluate collaboration are consistently lacking across the literature reviewed. Although important advances have been made recently in the area of evaluating One Health operations and outcomes, there is an opportunity to develop process-based performance measures for One Health collaboration and teamwork. Synthesising work on collaborative performance evaluation across multiple disciplinary and sectoral lanes and levels of collaborative analysis, the authors argue that, in addition to outcome-based One Health evaluation, the evaluation of One Health processes needs to be further refined and 'team' effectiveness needs to be evaluated at all levels of the health system: individual, organisational and network.","PeriodicalId":49596,"journal":{"name":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","volume":"41 1","pages":"279-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82384775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The capacity to effectively and efficiently address threats to public and animal health requires an adequately trained workforce. A prerequisite for this is an effective plan for building the capacity of both private and public health workers. Yet capacity building and workforce development within One Health collaboration remain challenging for a number of reasons, including competing priorities, sectorspecific funding and a lack of trust and communication across sectors. Practical considerations, such as differences in language and culture, and working across time zones and geography, also have a considerable influence. Consequently, previous attempts to build capacity have traditionally lacked the attributes necessary for effective development and sustainability, such as continuity and systematic coordination of the learning process. Through the presentation and analysis of two recently implemented workforce development programmes, the authors highlight effective characteristics of workforce initiatives to build capacity. Such programmes can play a strategic role in developing, coordinating and supporting systematic and sustainable training for One Health and Veterinary Services performance on a regional and global scale.
{"title":"Transforming the One Health workforce: lessons learned from initiatives in Africa, Asia and Latin America.","authors":"M. K. O'brien, A. M. Perez, K. Errecaborde","doi":"10.20506/rst.38.1.2956","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.38.1.2956","url":null,"abstract":"The capacity to effectively and efficiently address threats to public and animal health requires an adequately trained workforce. A prerequisite for this is an effective plan for building the capacity of both private and public health workers. Yet capacity building and workforce development within One Health collaboration remain challenging for a number of reasons, including competing priorities, sectorspecific funding and a lack of trust and communication across sectors. Practical considerations, such as differences in language and culture, and working across time zones and geography, also have a considerable influence. Consequently, previous attempts to build capacity have traditionally lacked the attributes necessary for effective development and sustainability, such as continuity and systematic coordination of the learning process. Through the presentation and analysis of two recently implemented workforce development programmes, the authors highlight effective characteristics of workforce initiatives to build capacity. Such programmes can play a strategic role in developing, coordinating and supporting systematic and sustainable training for One Health and Veterinary Services performance on a regional and global scale.","PeriodicalId":49596,"journal":{"name":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","volume":"58 1","pages":"239-250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74698593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J. Stratton, E. Tagliaro, J. Weaver, D. M. Sherman, M. Carron, A. Di Giacinto, V. Sharandak, F. Caya
Animals, and the health systems which ensure their protection, play a vital role in the security and economic and social well-being of humanity, and are therefore a key component of the One Health concept. For global and national health security, prevention is better than cure, and targeting 'risk at source' in animal populations is a vital strategy in safeguarding the planet from risks of emerging zoonoses and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Neglected zoonoses - such as rabies and brucellosis - continue to have a significant global impact on human health and are also best managed at their animal source. The World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) has built international consensus on the principles of good governance and the quality of Veterinary Services, which are incorporated within its international standards. The OIE has a proven track record in the provision of Member Country support based on these standards, especially since the advent of its flagship Performance of Veterinary Services (PVS) Pathway programme in 2006-2007. To date, approximately 140 countries have benefited from the structured and sustainable process of animal health systems evaluation and planning afforded by the PVS Pathway. The PVS Tool, the basic methodology upon which the PVS Pathway is based, addresses One Health by evaluating the Veterinary Authority's ability to coordinate with other Competent Authorities that have a role to play in One Health, most notably public health, food safety, and environmental authorities. Despite the undoubted success of the PVS Pathway, the OIE felt that it was time to consider how the programme might be developed to adapt to new challenges. Consequently, during 2017-2018, the OIE embarked on a process of PVS evolution, during which it carried out extensive consultation and further tailored the PVS Pathway to a changing global context. These improvements, which include both fundamental adaptations to the PVS Pathway methods and the development of new PVS Pathway activities targeting topics such as multisectoral collaboration, rabies and AMR, have further strengthened and embedded the One Health approach within the PVS Pathway.
{"title":"Performance of Veterinary Services Pathway evolution and One Health aspects.","authors":"J. Stratton, E. Tagliaro, J. Weaver, D. M. Sherman, M. Carron, A. Di Giacinto, V. Sharandak, F. Caya","doi":"10.20506/rst.38.1.2961","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.38.1.2961","url":null,"abstract":"Animals, and the health systems which ensure their protection, play a vital role in the security and economic and social well-being of humanity, and are therefore a key component of the One Health concept. For global and national health security, prevention is better than cure, and targeting 'risk at source' in animal populations is a vital strategy in safeguarding the planet from risks of emerging zoonoses and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Neglected zoonoses - such as rabies and brucellosis - continue to have a significant global impact on human health and are also best managed at their animal source. The World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) has built international consensus on the principles of good governance and the quality of Veterinary Services, which are incorporated within its international standards. The OIE has a proven track record in the provision of Member Country support based on these standards, especially since the advent of its flagship Performance of Veterinary Services (PVS) Pathway programme in 2006-2007. To date, approximately 140 countries have benefited from the structured and sustainable process of animal health systems evaluation and planning afforded by the PVS Pathway. The PVS Tool, the basic methodology upon which the PVS Pathway is based, addresses One Health by evaluating the Veterinary Authority's ability to coordinate with other Competent Authorities that have a role to play in One Health, most notably public health, food safety, and environmental authorities. Despite the undoubted success of the PVS Pathway, the OIE felt that it was time to consider how the programme might be developed to adapt to new challenges. Consequently, during 2017-2018, the OIE embarked on a process of PVS evolution, during which it carried out extensive consultation and further tailored the PVS Pathway to a changing global context. These improvements, which include both fundamental adaptations to the PVS Pathway methods and the development of new PVS Pathway activities targeting topics such as multisectoral collaboration, rabies and AMR, have further strengthened and embedded the One Health approach within the PVS Pathway.","PeriodicalId":49596,"journal":{"name":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","volume":"14 1","pages":"291-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81352272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Infectious diseases are known to disproportionately affect the poorer sectors of society, particularly those living in low- and middle-income countries. These vulnerable populations battle disease, debt, loss of livelihood and reduced economic well-being with consequences that extend to their families, communities, livestock and the environment. A strong One Health approach is acknowledged as a successful way of enhancing current capacity for the prevention and control of emerging infectious diseases. Furthermore, it is also an effective way to address the multifaceted nuances of poverty. In recognising the interconnectedness of human and animal health with the health of our shared environment, One Health offers a valuable framework to prevent and control emerging infectious diseases through collaboration, coordination and communication across the various sectors involved. In recent years, as examples of One Health implementation have been documented and assessed, the linkages between One Health interventions and poverty alleviation have become more obvious. One Health interventions have the potential to reduce the economic burden of disease and create more efficient systems and approaches that generate higher savings, both direct and indirect, at the human-animal-environment interface. This paper describes aspects of this potential in detail. Although, at present, examples of the relationship between One Health and poverty alleviation are few, they are compelling. The authors believe that they provide persuasive evidence to encourage governments and policy-makers to employ the One Health approach in their efforts to alleviate poverty. Measuring the impact of this link between One Health and poverty alleviation has its constraints since appropriate metrics are still evolving. However, this paper hopes to establish the wisdom of recognising the role that One Health can play in reducing poverty, as well as its capacity to enhance existing policy frameworks.
{"title":"Opportunities for One Health policies to reduce poverty.","authors":"M. Kakkar, A. Chauhan, T. Bahl, M. Rahi","doi":"10.20506/rst.38.1.2948","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.38.1.2948","url":null,"abstract":"Infectious diseases are known to disproportionately affect the poorer sectors of society, particularly those living in low- and middle-income countries. These vulnerable populations battle disease, debt, loss of livelihood and reduced economic well-being with consequences that extend to their families, communities, livestock and the environment. A strong One Health approach is acknowledged as a successful way of enhancing current capacity for the prevention and control of emerging infectious diseases. Furthermore, it is also an effective way to address the multifaceted nuances of poverty. In recognising the interconnectedness of human and animal health with the health of our shared environment, One Health offers a valuable framework to prevent and control emerging infectious diseases through collaboration, coordination and communication across the various sectors involved. In recent years, as examples of One Health implementation have been documented and assessed, the linkages between One Health interventions and poverty alleviation have become more obvious. One Health interventions have the potential to reduce the economic burden of disease and create more efficient systems and approaches that generate higher savings, both direct and indirect, at the human-animal-environment interface. This paper describes aspects of this potential in detail. Although, at present, examples of the relationship between One Health and poverty alleviation are few, they are compelling. The authors believe that they provide persuasive evidence to encourage governments and policy-makers to employ the One Health approach in their efforts to alleviate poverty. Measuring the impact of this link between One Health and poverty alleviation has its constraints since appropriate metrics are still evolving. However, this paper hopes to establish the wisdom of recognising the role that One Health can play in reducing poverty, as well as its capacity to enhance existing policy frameworks.","PeriodicalId":49596,"journal":{"name":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","volume":"43 1","pages":"135-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90497987","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
K Pelican, S J Salyer, C Barton Behravesh, G Belot, M Carron, F Caya, S De La Rocque, K M Errecaborde, G Lamielle, F Latronico, K W Macy, B Mouille, E Mumford, S Shadomy, J R Sinclair, T Dutcher
Multisectoral, One Health collaboration is essential for addressing national and international health threats that arise at the human-animal-environment interface. Thanks to the efforts of multiple organisations, countries now have an array of One Health tools available to assess capacities within and between sectors, plan and prioritise activities, and strengthen multisectoral, One Health coordination, communication, and collaboration. By doing so, they are able to address health threats at the human-animal-environment interface, including emerging zoonotic and infectious diseases, more efficiently. However, to ensure optimal outcomes for the countries using these One Health tools, the partners responsible for implementation should regularly collaborate and share information such as implementation timelines, results and lessons learned, so that one process can inform the next. This paper presents a consensus framework on how commonly implemented One Health tools might align to best support countries in strengthening One Health systems. Twelve One Health tools were selected based on their high implementation rates, authors' experience with these tools and their focus on multisectoral, One Health coordination. Through a four-step process, the authors: a) jointly carried out a landscape analysis of One Health tools, using a Cloudbased spreadsheet to share the unique characteristics and applications of each tool; b) performed an implementation analysis to identify and share implementation dynamics and identify respective outcomes and synergies; c) jointly created a consensus conceptual model of how the authors suggest the tools might logically work together; and d) extrapolated from steps 1-3 an agreed-upon overarching conceptual framework for how current and future One Health tools could be categorised to best support One Health system strengthening at the national level. Highlighted One Health tools include the States Parties Annual Reporting Tool under the International Health Regulations (IHR), the World Organisation for Animal Health Performance of Veterinary Services (PVS) Pathway, the Joint External Evaluation process, IHR/PVS National Bridging Workshops, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention One Health Zoonotic Disease Prioritization Tool, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Laboratory Mapping Tool, the FAO Assessment Tool for Laboratories and Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Systems, the FAO Surveillance Evaluation Tool, the One Health Systems Mapping and Analysis Resource Toolkit, the National Action Plan for Health Security, and IHR Monitoring and Evaluation Framework tools for After Action Reviews and Simulation Exercises. A new guidance document entitled, Taking a Multisectoral, One Health Approach: A Tripartite Guide to Addressing Zoonotic Diseases in Countries was also included as a framework that provides guidance to support the implementation of the outputs of the tools described.
{"title":"Synergising tools for capacity assessment and One Health operationalisation.","authors":"K Pelican, S J Salyer, C Barton Behravesh, G Belot, M Carron, F Caya, S De La Rocque, K M Errecaborde, G Lamielle, F Latronico, K W Macy, B Mouille, E Mumford, S Shadomy, J R Sinclair, T Dutcher","doi":"10.20506/rst.38.1.2942","DOIUrl":"10.20506/rst.38.1.2942","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multisectoral, One Health collaboration is essential for addressing national and international health threats that arise at the human-animal-environment interface. Thanks to the efforts of multiple organisations, countries now have an array of One Health tools available to assess capacities within and between sectors, plan and prioritise activities, and strengthen multisectoral, One Health coordination, communication, and collaboration. By doing so, they are able to address health threats at the human-animal-environment interface, including emerging zoonotic and infectious diseases, more efficiently. However, to ensure optimal outcomes for the countries using these One Health tools, the partners responsible for implementation should regularly collaborate and share information such as implementation timelines, results and lessons learned, so that one process can inform the next. This paper presents a consensus framework on how commonly implemented One Health tools might align to best support countries in strengthening One Health systems. Twelve One Health tools were selected based on their high implementation rates, authors' experience with these tools and their focus on multisectoral, One Health coordination. Through a four-step process, the authors: a) jointly carried out a landscape analysis of One Health tools, using a Cloudbased spreadsheet to share the unique characteristics and applications of each tool; b) performed an implementation analysis to identify and share implementation dynamics and identify respective outcomes and synergies; c) jointly created a consensus conceptual model of how the authors suggest the tools might logically work together; and d) extrapolated from steps 1-3 an agreed-upon overarching conceptual framework for how current and future One Health tools could be categorised to best support One Health system strengthening at the national level. Highlighted One Health tools include the States Parties Annual Reporting Tool under the International Health Regulations (IHR), the World Organisation for Animal Health Performance of Veterinary Services (PVS) Pathway, the Joint External Evaluation process, IHR/PVS National Bridging Workshops, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention One Health Zoonotic Disease Prioritization Tool, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Laboratory Mapping Tool, the FAO Assessment Tool for Laboratories and Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Systems, the FAO Surveillance Evaluation Tool, the One Health Systems Mapping and Analysis Resource Toolkit, the National Action Plan for Health Security, and IHR Monitoring and Evaluation Framework tools for After Action Reviews and Simulation Exercises. A new guidance document entitled, Taking a Multisectoral, One Health Approach: A Tripartite Guide to Addressing Zoonotic Diseases in Countries was also included as a framework that provides guidance to support the implementation of the outputs of the tools described.</p>","PeriodicalId":49596,"journal":{"name":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","volume":"61 6","pages":"71-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8046509/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72634613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-12-01DOI: 10.20506/RST.ISSUE.36.3.2709
Oie
{"title":"Plurithematic issue - Scientific and Technical Review, Vol. 36 (3)","authors":"Oie","doi":"10.20506/RST.ISSUE.36.3.2709","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20506/RST.ISSUE.36.3.2709","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49596,"journal":{"name":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","volume":"3 1","pages":"736-1052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79198320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2017-01-04DOI: 10.20506/rst.issue.36.1.2604
M. MacLeod, D. Moran
This Review allows the presentation of what is currently considered best practice in the use of economics in animal health, and it looks at where economics could be incorporated into animal health investments and programmes to ensure that the allocation of resources is both proportionate and timely. Understanding the socio-economic circumstances in which animal diseases emerge, are maintained and spread, is both a part of economic impact assessments and a basis for multidisciplinary assessments of animal health interventions. Such assessments need to consider animal welfare and take into account the value that society places on this important aspect of animal care. In addition to changes in public attitudes towards animal health and welfare, there has been a shift in the way the world uses and views economics. The neo-classical basis of economic assessment is under scrutiny and alternative views of how to assess people’s behaviour have been proposed. These are applicable to an animal health context and need to be explored if economics is to add value to animal disease management and to overall leadership on animal health and welfare policies and standards. Vol. 36 (1), April 2017, Trilingual ISBN 978-92-95108-30-1 29.7 x 21 cm, approx. 350 pp. Ref.: R 36 (1), Price: 70 €
本审查报告介绍了目前被认为在动物卫生中使用经济学的最佳做法，并探讨了在哪些方面可以将经济学纳入动物卫生投资和规划，以确保资源的分配既相称又及时。了解动物疾病出现、维持和传播的社会经济环境，既是经济影响评估的一部分，也是对动物卫生干预措施进行多学科评估的基础。这样的评估需要考虑动物福利，并考虑到社会对动物护理这一重要方面的重视。除了公众对动物健康和福利的态度发生变化外，世界使用和看待经济学的方式也发生了变化。经济评估的新古典主义基础正在受到审视，关于如何评估人们行为的其他观点也已被提出。如果经济学要为动物疾病管理和对动物健康和福利政策及标准的全面领导增加价值，这些原则适用于动物健康背景，需要加以探索。36(1)， 2017年4月，TrilingualISBN 978-92-95108-30-129.7 x 21厘米，约。350页，ref: R 36 (1)， Price: 70€
{"title":"Integrating livestock health measures into marginal abatement cost curves: -EN- -FR- L’intégration des paramètres de santé du bétail dans les courbes de coût marginal d’abattement -ES- Incluir parámetros de salud pecuaria en las curvas del costo marginal de reducción","authors":"M. MacLeod, D. Moran","doi":"10.20506/rst.issue.36.1.2604","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.issue.36.1.2604","url":null,"abstract":"This Review allows the presentation of what is currently considered best practice in the use of economics in animal health, and it looks at where economics could be incorporated into animal health investments and programmes to ensure that the allocation of resources is both proportionate and timely.\u0000\u0000Understanding the socio-economic circumstances in which animal diseases emerge, are maintained and spread, is both a part of economic impact assessments and a basis for multidisciplinary assessments of animal health interventions. Such assessments need to consider animal welfare and take into account the value that society places on this important aspect of animal care.\u0000In addition to changes in public attitudes towards animal health and welfare, there has been a shift in the way the world uses and views economics. The neo-classical basis of economic assessment is under scrutiny and alternative views of how to assess people’s behaviour have been proposed. These are applicable to an animal health context and need to be explored if economics is to add value to animal disease management and to overall leadership on animal health and welfare policies and standards.\u0000\u0000Vol. 36 (1), April 2017, Trilingual\u0000ISBN 978-92-95108-30-1\u000029.7 x 21 cm, approx. 350 pp.\u0000Ref.: R 36 (1), Price: 70 €","PeriodicalId":49596,"journal":{"name":"Revue Scientifique et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties","volume":"44 1","pages":"97-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6,"publicationDate":"2017-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74897809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：