Failure to find hydrocarbon prospects in the Solway Basin region has resulted in a lack of research into the local Sherwood Sandstone Group petrography, reservoir quality and depositional history compared to the analogous southern reservoirs in the EISB which will be utilized for carbon storage. A detailed petrographic study is presented which aims to understand if the Solway Firth could have similar utility. The Permo–Triassic Sherwood Sandstone Group is believed to be deposited in depocentres connected during the Early Triassic by the extensive ‘Budleighensis’ fluvial system. Here, the Solway and Carlisle basins are proposed as terminal sites for this endorheic system, with the Lower Triassic Annan Sandstone Formation ascribed to the distal region of a fluvial distributary zone and the overlying Kirklinton Sandstone Formation thought to mark a transition to a basinal zone, depositing aeolian sandstones and locally associated playa lake facies. Fluid inclusion, stable isotope burial history modelling and field observations have been used to assess the relative timing and importance of different diagenetic cements. Early diagenetic cements include grain-rimming haematite and patchy calcite cement, especially in the Annan Sandstone Formation. Later burial diagenesis sees further calcite cement, quartz overgrowths and, restricted to the Kirklinton Sandstone Formation, ferroan dolomite. Porosity and permeability show significant differences between fluvial Annan and aeolian Kirklinton facies associations. Despite the finer grain size, a reservoir with excellent porosity and permeability as well as no hydrocarbon charging or legacy hydrocarbon extraction is persevered, suggesting the Solway Basin could be a secure CO2 storage site.
This article is part of the Energy Geoscience Series available at https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/energy-geoscience-series
Supplementary material: An overview of the primary and secondary data collected and utilised in this study, as well as raw data values are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5906677
Many basins in Indonesia such as the North Sumatra, South Sumatra and Lower Kutai are highly overpressured. As a result, some wells have experienced drilling problems resulting in termination. In the literature, an empirical relationship such as Eaton has historically often been used to interpret pore pressure. In this paper, we take an alternative approach, one based on deterministic models.
Herein, we use Bowers’ and Dutta's equations to calculate the contributions of loading and unloading to the overall overpressure. Due to the advantages of the density log, the contributions of loading and unloading can be discriminated. By applying these methods, we suggest that in the North Sumatra Basin, unloading is caused by clay diagenesis. In the others, gas generation is significant.
The analysis also reveals that the unloading parameter (U) in the North Sumatra and South Sumatra basins is different than that of U in the Lower Kutai Basin. This suggests that mudrock in the overpressure zone in the Sumatran basins is more elastic than that in the Lower Kutai Basin, which appears to be more plastic in behaviour.
Thematic collection: This article is part of the Geopressure collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/geopressure
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：