首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
A 10-Year Comparative Analysis of the Two Most Common Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Implants (Delta Xtend and SMR) in the New Zealand Joint Registry. 新西兰关节注册中心对两种最常见的反向全肩关节置换术植入物(Delta Xtend和SMR)的10年比较分析。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.009
Scott M Bolam, Adam Stoneham, Mei Lin Tay, Chris M A Frampton, Peter C Poon, Ryan Gao, Brendan Coleman, Adam Dalgleish

Hypothesis and background: As the incidence of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) continues to rise, better understanding of the long-term risks and complications is necessary to determine the best choice of implant. The majority (75%) of RTSA performed in New Zealand use either SMR (Systema Multiplana Randelli, Lima-LTO, Italy) or Delta Xtend (DePuy Synthes, USA). The aim of this registry-based study was to compare implant survival, risk of revision and reasons for revision between the two most frequently used RTSA prostheses: SMR and Delta Xtend.

Methods: Using data from the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1999 and 2022, we identified 5,891 patients who underwent RTSA using either SMR cementless (62.8%) or Delta Xtend prostheses (37.2%). Delta Xtend was sub-divided into cementless (31.4% of total) and cemented humeral stem (5.8% of total) sub-groups for analysis. Revision-free implant survival and functional outcomes (Oxford Shoulder Score [OSS] at 6-months, 5-years, and 10-years were adjusted by age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, indication, sex, and surgeon volum for between-group comparisons.

Results: Ten-year revision-free implant survival was 93.0%, 92.5%, and 95.8% for Delta Xtend cemented, Delta Xtend cementless and SMR, respectively. The Delta Xtend cemented implant had a two-fold higher adjusted revision risk compared to both the Delta Xtend cementless and the SMR cementless implants (Hazard Ratio [HR]=2.04, p=0.011; and HR=2.59, p<0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference between the Delta Xtend cementless and SMR cementless groups (HR=1.28, p=0.129). The Delta Xtend cemented group was significantly (p≤0.01) older, more co-morbid (ASA 3-4), female and indicated for fracture compared to other groups. The most common reason(s) for revision was aseptic loosening and infection for Delta Xtend cementless; aseptic loosening, instability/dislocation and infection for Delta Xtend cemented; and aseptic loosening alone for SMR cementless. Average OSS was significantly lower in Delta Xtend cemented compared to Delta Xtend cementless and SMR cementless at 6 months (30.8, 35.9 vs. 35.6, respectively, p<0.01) and 5 years (37.4, 40.7 vs. 39.5, respectively, p<0.01).

Conclusions: Overall, we found Delta Xtend cemented group had over two-fold the risk of revision compared to Delta Xtend cementless and SMR cementless groups, while there was no difference in revision risk between the Delta Xtend and SMR cementless prostheses. As the incidence of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) continues to rise, better understanding of the long-term risks and complications is necessary to determine the best choice of implant.

假设与背景:随着逆行全肩关节置换术(RTSA)的发生率持续上升,更好地了解长期风险和并发症是确定最佳植入物选择的必要条件。在新西兰进行的大多数RTSA(75%)使用SMR (Systema Multiplana Randelli, Lima-LTO,意大利)或Delta Xtend (DePuy Synthes,美国)。这项基于注册表的研究的目的是比较两种最常用的RTSA假体:SMR和Delta Xtend的种植体存活率、翻修风险和翻修原因。方法:使用1999年至2022年新西兰联合登记处的数据,我们确定了5,891例使用SMR无骨水泥(62.8%)或Delta Xtend假体(37.2%)进行RTSA的患者。Delta Xtend被细分为无骨水泥(31.4%)和骨水泥肱骨干(5.8%)亚组进行分析。在6个月、5年和10年时,根据年龄、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、适应证、性别和手术量调整无修复假体存活和功能结局(牛津肩关节评分[OSS])进行组间比较。结果:Delta Xtend骨水泥、Delta Xtend无骨水泥和SMR的10年无修复种植体存活率分别为93.0%、92.5%和95.8%。Delta Xtend骨水泥种植体的调整翻修风险比Delta Xtend无骨水泥种植体和SMR无骨水泥种植体高2倍(风险比[HR]=2.04, p=0.011;结论:总体而言,我们发现Delta Xtend骨水泥组的翻修风险是Delta Xtend无骨水泥组和SMR无骨水泥组的两倍以上,而Delta Xtend和SMR无骨水泥假体的翻修风险没有差异。随着逆行全肩关节置换术(RTSA)的发生率持续上升,更好地了解长期风险和并发症是确定最佳植入物选择的必要条件。
{"title":"A 10-Year Comparative Analysis of the Two Most Common Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Implants (Delta Xtend and SMR) in the New Zealand Joint Registry.","authors":"Scott M Bolam, Adam Stoneham, Mei Lin Tay, Chris M A Frampton, Peter C Poon, Ryan Gao, Brendan Coleman, Adam Dalgleish","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Hypothesis and background: </strong>As the incidence of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) continues to rise, better understanding of the long-term risks and complications is necessary to determine the best choice of implant. The majority (75%) of RTSA performed in New Zealand use either SMR (Systema Multiplana Randelli, Lima-LTO, Italy) or Delta Xtend (DePuy Synthes, USA). The aim of this registry-based study was to compare implant survival, risk of revision and reasons for revision between the two most frequently used RTSA prostheses: SMR and Delta Xtend.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1999 and 2022, we identified 5,891 patients who underwent RTSA using either SMR cementless (62.8%) or Delta Xtend prostheses (37.2%). Delta Xtend was sub-divided into cementless (31.4% of total) and cemented humeral stem (5.8% of total) sub-groups for analysis. Revision-free implant survival and functional outcomes (Oxford Shoulder Score [OSS] at 6-months, 5-years, and 10-years were adjusted by age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, indication, sex, and surgeon volum for between-group comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten-year revision-free implant survival was 93.0%, 92.5%, and 95.8% for Delta Xtend cemented, Delta Xtend cementless and SMR, respectively. The Delta Xtend cemented implant had a two-fold higher adjusted revision risk compared to both the Delta Xtend cementless and the SMR cementless implants (Hazard Ratio [HR]=2.04, p=0.011; and HR=2.59, p<0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference between the Delta Xtend cementless and SMR cementless groups (HR=1.28, p=0.129). The Delta Xtend cemented group was significantly (p≤0.01) older, more co-morbid (ASA 3-4), female and indicated for fracture compared to other groups. The most common reason(s) for revision was aseptic loosening and infection for Delta Xtend cementless; aseptic loosening, instability/dislocation and infection for Delta Xtend cemented; and aseptic loosening alone for SMR cementless. Average OSS was significantly lower in Delta Xtend cemented compared to Delta Xtend cementless and SMR cementless at 6 months (30.8, 35.9 vs. 35.6, respectively, p<0.01) and 5 years (37.4, 40.7 vs. 39.5, respectively, p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, we found Delta Xtend cemented group had over two-fold the risk of revision compared to Delta Xtend cementless and SMR cementless groups, while there was no difference in revision risk between the Delta Xtend and SMR cementless prostheses. As the incidence of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) continues to rise, better understanding of the long-term risks and complications is necessary to determine the best choice of implant.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142933303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic bony Bankart repair using the 'door-locking' technique: excellent bone healing with a low complication rate. 关节镜下“锁门”技术骨Bankart修复的临床和影像学结果:骨愈合良好,并发症发生率低。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.011
Qiangqiang Li, Peng Sun, Yu Zhang, Kai Fu, Jianghui Qin, Qing Jiang, Dongyang Chen

Background: Arthroscopic repair is recommended for patients with bony Bankart lesions to restore anterior shoulder stability and avoid recurrent glenohumeral instability. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients following arthroscopic bony Bankart repair using a single suture anchor fixation technique named the "door-locking" technique.

Methods: From January 2017 to February 2024, a consecutive series of 22 patients with acute bony Bankart lesions underwent shoulder arthroscopy. The size of the fragment was measured using computed tomography (CT). The range of motion (ROM) and functional scores including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, and Rowe score were assessed preoperatively, immediately after the surgery, and at the final follow-up. The adequacy of reduction and union of the bony fragment were evaluated by CT postoperatively. Intra- and postoperative complications and patient satisfaction were evaluated.

Results: Four women and 18 men were included in the study, with an average age of 39.4 years (range, 21-68 years). The mean time from the initial injury to surgery was 16.5 days (range, 3-45 days). The average glenoid bone defect was 21.1% (range, 9%-45%). The operation time ranged from 45-150 minutes, with an average of 80.4 minutes. The mean duration of follow-up was 28.0 months (range, 4-54 months). The mean ASES score, UCLA score, and Rowe score improved from 42.1, 11.6, and 56.0 preoperatively to 91.8, 31.1, and 93.2 at the last follow-up, respectively (all P < 0.05). At the final follow-up, the ROM in terms of forward elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation was significantly improved compared with that before surgery. There was no recurrence of instability. No serious complications (e.g., infection, thrombosis, and re-dislocation) occurred. The postoperative CT scan showed adequate reduction and complete union of the bony fragment in 20 cases. However, the bony fragments were not anatomically reduced in two patients due to a large fragment size. All patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome.

Conclusion: The arthroscopic "door-locking" technique is a valid method for treating acute bony Bankart lesions with an intact capsular-labrum-ligament complex. This method has a low complication rate and is associated with high levels of patient satisfaction.

背景:推荐对Bankart骨性病变患者进行关节镜修复,以恢复肩关节前部的稳定性,避免复发性肩关节不稳定。本研究的目的是探讨关节镜下骨Bankart修复后患者的临床和影像学结果,采用单缝线锚定固定技术,称为“锁门”技术。方法:2017年1月至2024年2月,对22例急性骨性Bankart病变患者进行肩关节镜检查。使用计算机断层扫描(CT)测量碎片的大小。活动范围(ROM)和功能评分,包括美国肩关节外科医生(ASES)评分、加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)评分和Rowe评分,在术前、术后和最后随访时进行评估。术后通过CT评估骨碎片复位和愈合是否充分。评估手术内、术后并发症及患者满意度。结果:女性4例,男性18例,平均年龄39.4岁(21 ~ 68岁)。从初始损伤到手术的平均时间为16.5天(范围3-45天)。关节盂骨缺损平均为21.1%(范围9%-45%)。手术时间45 ~ 150分钟,平均80.4分钟。平均随访时间28.0个月(4 ~ 54个月)。平均as评分、UCLA评分、Rowe评分分别由术前的42.1、11.6、56.0提高至末次随访时的91.8、31.1、93.2,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在最后随访时,与术前相比,前仰、外旋和内旋活动度均有明显改善。没有再出现不稳定。无严重并发症(如感染、血栓形成、再脱位)发生。术后CT扫描显示20例骨碎片复位充分,完全愈合。然而,由于碎片大小较大,两例患者的骨碎片在解剖上没有减少。所有患者对治疗结果均满意或非常满意。结论:关节镜“锁门”技术是治疗具有完整囊-唇-韧带复合体的急性骨Bankart病变的有效方法。该方法并发症发生率低,患者满意度高。
{"title":"Clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic bony Bankart repair using the 'door-locking' technique: excellent bone healing with a low complication rate.","authors":"Qiangqiang Li, Peng Sun, Yu Zhang, Kai Fu, Jianghui Qin, Qing Jiang, Dongyang Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arthroscopic repair is recommended for patients with bony Bankart lesions to restore anterior shoulder stability and avoid recurrent glenohumeral instability. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients following arthroscopic bony Bankart repair using a single suture anchor fixation technique named the \"door-locking\" technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2017 to February 2024, a consecutive series of 22 patients with acute bony Bankart lesions underwent shoulder arthroscopy. The size of the fragment was measured using computed tomography (CT). The range of motion (ROM) and functional scores including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, and Rowe score were assessed preoperatively, immediately after the surgery, and at the final follow-up. The adequacy of reduction and union of the bony fragment were evaluated by CT postoperatively. Intra- and postoperative complications and patient satisfaction were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four women and 18 men were included in the study, with an average age of 39.4 years (range, 21-68 years). The mean time from the initial injury to surgery was 16.5 days (range, 3-45 days). The average glenoid bone defect was 21.1% (range, 9%-45%). The operation time ranged from 45-150 minutes, with an average of 80.4 minutes. The mean duration of follow-up was 28.0 months (range, 4-54 months). The mean ASES score, UCLA score, and Rowe score improved from 42.1, 11.6, and 56.0 preoperatively to 91.8, 31.1, and 93.2 at the last follow-up, respectively (all P < 0.05). At the final follow-up, the ROM in terms of forward elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation was significantly improved compared with that before surgery. There was no recurrence of instability. No serious complications (e.g., infection, thrombosis, and re-dislocation) occurred. The postoperative CT scan showed adequate reduction and complete union of the bony fragment in 20 cases. However, the bony fragments were not anatomically reduced in two patients due to a large fragment size. All patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The arthroscopic \"door-locking\" technique is a valid method for treating acute bony Bankart lesions with an intact capsular-labrum-ligament complex. This method has a low complication rate and is associated with high levels of patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142933343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Addition of PROMIS Pain Instruments to PROMIS Upper Extremity Physical Function Improves the Responsiveness of PROMIS scores compared to Legacy scores in patients undergoing Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study. 在全肩关节置换术患者中,将PROMIS疼痛器械加入到PROMIS上肢物理功能中,与Legacy评分相比,PROMIS评分的反应性得到改善:一项前瞻性研究。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.012
Paul V Romeo, Matthew G Alben, Aidan G Papalia, Tas Chowdhury, Andrew J Cecora, Dashaun Ragland, Young W Kwon, Joseph D Zuckerman, Mandeep S Virk

Introduction: Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) is increasingly being utilized across the United States as a patient reported outcome evaluation tool for a wide variety of musculoskeletal conditions. However, PROMIS Upper Extremity physical function (P-UE) has demonstrated limited responsiveness in the early postoperative period after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The aim of this study is to determine if addition of PROMIS Pain Interference (P-Interference) or Pain Intensity (P-Intensity) scores improve the ability to detect postoperative changes in the one-year postoperative period following TSA.

Methods: Patients who were indicated for and elected to undergo TSA between 2020-2022 were prospectively enrolled. Prospective data was collected for patient surveys (ASES, SST, WOOS, P-UE, P-Interference and P-Intensity) at the 2-week, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month timepoints. Instrument responsiveness for each PROM was evaluated using the effect size (ES; Cohen d). Responsiveness was defined by the absolute values of each measurement, previously reported as small (0.2), medium (0.5), or large (0.8). Statistical analysis (two sample t-tests and Fisher's tests) was performed using R studio version 4.2.3 (Boston, MA, USA).

Results: A total of 127 subjects were enrolled in this study. All survey instruments demonstrated large responsiveness (>0.8) at 3, 6 and 12-months. P-Intensity was the only instrument to demonstrate large responsiveness at 2-weeks with its addition to P-UE showing an improved responsiveness at all time points. Moreover, the addition of P-Intensity had a lower response burden at all time points when compared to the legacy measures (ASES, SST and OSS) at all time points albeit no difference to ASES (p=0.55) at 12-months after surgery. P-Interference, and other legacy scores demonstrated large responsiveness starting at 6-weeks postoperatively.

Conclusion: The responsiveness of PROMIS UE can be improved by coupling the outcome measure to P-Intensity scores with a significantly lower response burden when compared to the legacy measures evaluated at nearly all time points.

简介:患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)在美国越来越多地被用作各种肌肉骨骼疾病的患者报告结果评估工具。然而,PROMIS上肢物理功能(P-UE)在全肩关节置换术(TSA)术后早期的反应性有限。本研究的目的是确定增加PROMIS疼痛干扰(P-Interference)或疼痛强度(P-Intensity)评分是否能提高TSA术后一年内检测术后变化的能力。方法:前瞻性纳入2020-2022年适应症和选择接受TSA的患者。在2周、6周、3个月、6个月和12个月的时间点收集前瞻性数据进行患者调查(asa、SST、wos、P-UE、p -干扰和p -强度)。使用效应量(ES)评估每个PROM的仪器响应性;响应性由每次测量的绝对值定义,以前报道为小(0.2)、中(0.5)或大(0.8)。使用R studio 4.2.3版(Boston, MA, USA)进行统计分析(两个样本t检验和Fisher检验)。结果:本研究共纳入127名受试者。在第3个月和第12个月时,所有调查工具都显示出较大的响应性(>.8)。p -强度是唯一在2周时表现出较大反应的工具,P-UE的增加在所有时间点都显示出改善的反应性。此外,在手术后12个月,与遗留措施(asas、SST和OSS)相比,p强度的增加在所有时间点的反应负担都较低,尽管与asas没有差异(p=0.55)。p -干扰和其他遗留评分显示,从术后6周开始有较大的反应性。结论:与几乎所有时间点评估的遗留措施相比,通过将结果测量与p -强度评分相结合,PROMIS UE的反应性可以得到改善,反应负担显著降低。
{"title":"Addition of PROMIS Pain Instruments to PROMIS Upper Extremity Physical Function Improves the Responsiveness of PROMIS scores compared to Legacy scores in patients undergoing Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.","authors":"Paul V Romeo, Matthew G Alben, Aidan G Papalia, Tas Chowdhury, Andrew J Cecora, Dashaun Ragland, Young W Kwon, Joseph D Zuckerman, Mandeep S Virk","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.012","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) is increasingly being utilized across the United States as a patient reported outcome evaluation tool for a wide variety of musculoskeletal conditions. However, PROMIS Upper Extremity physical function (P-UE) has demonstrated limited responsiveness in the early postoperative period after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The aim of this study is to determine if addition of PROMIS Pain Interference (P-Interference) or Pain Intensity (P-Intensity) scores improve the ability to detect postoperative changes in the one-year postoperative period following TSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who were indicated for and elected to undergo TSA between 2020-2022 were prospectively enrolled. Prospective data was collected for patient surveys (ASES, SST, WOOS, P-UE, P-Interference and P-Intensity) at the 2-week, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month timepoints. Instrument responsiveness for each PROM was evaluated using the effect size (ES; Cohen d). Responsiveness was defined by the absolute values of each measurement, previously reported as small (0.2), medium (0.5), or large (0.8). Statistical analysis (two sample t-tests and Fisher's tests) was performed using R studio version 4.2.3 (Boston, MA, USA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 127 subjects were enrolled in this study. All survey instruments demonstrated large responsiveness (>0.8) at 3, 6 and 12-months. P-Intensity was the only instrument to demonstrate large responsiveness at 2-weeks with its addition to P-UE showing an improved responsiveness at all time points. Moreover, the addition of P-Intensity had a lower response burden at all time points when compared to the legacy measures (ASES, SST and OSS) at all time points albeit no difference to ASES (p=0.55) at 12-months after surgery. P-Interference, and other legacy scores demonstrated large responsiveness starting at 6-weeks postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The responsiveness of PROMIS UE can be improved by coupling the outcome measure to P-Intensity scores with a significantly lower response burden when compared to the legacy measures evaluated at nearly all time points.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142933305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of Mental Health Disorders on Outcomes Following Shoulder Arthroplasty. 肩关节置换术后心理健康障碍对预后的影响
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.008
Stanley Liu, Andrew Gaetano, Andrew Chen, Krishin Shivdasani, Ashley MacConnell, Nickolas Garbis, Dane Salazar

Background: There is conflicting evidence on the impact of mental health on postoperative outcomes following total joint arthroplasty. Specific to shoulder arthroplasty there is a lack of data investigating the correlation between mental health and surgical outcomes. Most studies have focused on patient-reported outcome measures, while few have explored objective clinical outcomes. Additionally, studies that do explore clinical outcomes often fail to control for comorbidities. The purpose of this study is to determine if the presence of a mental health condition is associated with poorer outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty when accounting for covariates.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent primary shoulder arthroplasty between 2007 and 2022 at a single institution. Mental health diagnoses assessed included disorders associated with depression, anxiety, trauma, alcohol-use disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizoid disorders. Multivariable regression modeling was used to control for confounding variables and assess the likelihood of adverse clinical outcomes for patients with mental health disorders. Patient-reported outcome measures were also collected and compared.

Results: 1169 patients underwent shoulder arthroplasty between January 2007 and September 2023 at our institution. After controlling for covariates, all-cause readmission within 90 days was found to be significantly associated with alcohol-related disorders (OR = 3.22 [95% CI, 1.30-7.23], p = .007) and bipolar disorders (OR = 4.21 [95% CI, .88-15.58], p = .043).

Conclusion: After adjusting for covariates, alcohol-related and bipolar disorders may be associated with increased risk of 90-day readmission after shoulder arthroplasty, but further investigation is necessary in order to better assess these effects. No associations were found between any mental health disorders and 90-day reoperation of the same joint, 365-day mortality, or patient-reported outcomes.

背景:关于心理健康对全关节置换术后预后的影响,有相互矛盾的证据。具体到肩关节置换术,缺乏调查心理健康和手术结果之间相关性的数据。大多数研究都集中在患者报告的结果测量上,而很少有研究探索客观的临床结果。此外,探索临床结果的研究往往不能控制合并症。本研究的目的是确定当考虑协变量时,是否存在精神健康状况与肩关节置换术后较差的结果相关。方法:回顾性分析2007年至2022年间在一家机构接受原发性肩关节置换术的患者。评估的心理健康诊断包括与抑郁、焦虑、创伤、酒精使用障碍、双相情感障碍和精神分裂障碍相关的疾病。多变量回归模型用于控制混杂变量,并评估精神健康障碍患者不良临床结果的可能性。还收集和比较了患者报告的结果测量值。结果:2007年1月至2023年9月,1169例患者在我院接受了肩关节置换术。在控制了相关变量后,发现90天内的全因再入院与酒精相关障碍(OR = 3.22 [95% CI, 1.30-7.23], p = 0.007)和双相情感障碍(OR = 4.21 [95% CI, 0.88 -15.58], p = 0.043)显著相关。结论:在调整协变量后,酒精相关和双相情感障碍可能与肩关节置换术后90天再入院风险增加有关,但为了更好地评估这些影响,需要进一步的研究。未发现任何精神健康障碍与同一关节90天再手术、365天死亡率或患者报告的结果之间存在关联。
{"title":"Impact of Mental Health Disorders on Outcomes Following Shoulder Arthroplasty.","authors":"Stanley Liu, Andrew Gaetano, Andrew Chen, Krishin Shivdasani, Ashley MacConnell, Nickolas Garbis, Dane Salazar","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is conflicting evidence on the impact of mental health on postoperative outcomes following total joint arthroplasty. Specific to shoulder arthroplasty there is a lack of data investigating the correlation between mental health and surgical outcomes. Most studies have focused on patient-reported outcome measures, while few have explored objective clinical outcomes. Additionally, studies that do explore clinical outcomes often fail to control for comorbidities. The purpose of this study is to determine if the presence of a mental health condition is associated with poorer outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty when accounting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent primary shoulder arthroplasty between 2007 and 2022 at a single institution. Mental health diagnoses assessed included disorders associated with depression, anxiety, trauma, alcohol-use disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizoid disorders. Multivariable regression modeling was used to control for confounding variables and assess the likelihood of adverse clinical outcomes for patients with mental health disorders. Patient-reported outcome measures were also collected and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1169 patients underwent shoulder arthroplasty between January 2007 and September 2023 at our institution. After controlling for covariates, all-cause readmission within 90 days was found to be significantly associated with alcohol-related disorders (OR = 3.22 [95% CI, 1.30-7.23], p = .007) and bipolar disorders (OR = 4.21 [95% CI, .88-15.58], p = .043).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After adjusting for covariates, alcohol-related and bipolar disorders may be associated with increased risk of 90-day readmission after shoulder arthroplasty, but further investigation is necessary in order to better assess these effects. No associations were found between any mental health disorders and 90-day reoperation of the same joint, 365-day mortality, or patient-reported outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142933360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk factors for atraumatic isolated subscapularis tear: glenoid retroversion. 创伤性孤立肩胛下肌撕裂的风险因素:蝶鞍反转
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.09.024
Hyung Bin Park, Gyu-Min Lee, Ji Yong Gwark, Nitesh Gahlot, Jae-Boem Na

Background: Subscapularis tendon (SSC) tears have recently become an area of current research focus. However, the risk factors for atraumatic isolated SSC tears, particularly anatomical factors, remain poorly determined. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the associated factors contributing to isolated SSC tears.

Methods: This study involved single shoulders of 605 subjects drawn from a cohort of rural residents. The inclusion criteria required each subject to sign an informed consent document and to have a complete clinical evaluation. The exclusion criteria comprised the absence of a complete magnetic resonance imaging study, current medication use that might have affected serum lipid levels, a history of shoulder trauma or surgery, and the presence of osteoarthritis, calcific tendinitis, frozen shoulder, or superior or posterosuperior rotator cuff tear. Diagnoses of isolated SSC tear were based on magnetic resonance imaging findings. Logistic regression analysis was conducted using demographic, physical, social, anatomical, comorbidities, and serological parameters. Anatomical variables included the supraspinatus fossa glenoid angle on axial (SGAX), a method to measure glenoid version, coracohumeral distance on axial and sagittal plans, and coracoid index. When multicollinearity among studied variables was detected, separate multivariable analyses were performed to address this issue, with each analysis including only one of those multicollinear variables along with the other significant variables obtained from univariate analyses.

Results: Among anatomical variables, coracohumeral distance on axial and sagittal planes, as well as the coracoid index, did not show significant associations. However, SGAX, an index of glenoid version, was found to be significantly associated with atraumatic isolated SSC tears. Greater glenoid retroversion is significantly associated with atraumatic isolated SSC tears, along with age, waist circumference, dominant side involvement, manual labor, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and biceps tendon injury (P ≤ .013).

Conclusions: The SGAX, serving as an index for glenoid version, is an independently associated factor for atraumatic isolated subscapularis tendon tears, with greater glenoid retroversion being an anatomical risk factor for these tears, along with overuse-related factors such as dominant-side involvement and manual labor, as well as metabolic factors such as obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and biceps tendon injury.

背景:肩胛下肌腱(SSC)撕裂最近已成为当前研究的一个重点领域。然而,非创伤性孤立性 SSC 撕裂的危险因素,尤其是解剖学因素,仍未得到充分确定。因此,本研究旨在确定导致孤立性 SSC 撕裂的相关因素:本研究涉及从农村居民中抽取的 605 名受试者的单肩。纳入标准要求每位受试者签署知情同意书,并接受完整的临床评估。排除标准包括未进行完整的核磁共振成像检查、正在服用可能会影响血清脂质水平的药物、有肩部外伤或手术史、患有骨关节炎、钙化性肌腱炎、肩周炎、肩袖上部或后上方撕裂。孤立性 SSC 撕裂的诊断是基于核磁共振成像结果。利用人口统计学、体格、社会、解剖、合并症和血清学参数进行了逻辑回归分析。解剖学变量包括冈上肌窝盂角轴位(SGAX),这是一种测量盂成形度的方法,轴位和矢状位上的肱骨角距离,以及角弓反张指数。当发现研究变量之间存在多重共线性时,就会分别进行多变量分析来解决这一问题,每次分析只包括其中一个多重共线性变量以及单变量分析得出的其他重要变量:在解剖变量中,轴向和矢状面上的肱骨间距以及冠状面指数没有显示出显著的关联性。然而,SGAX(盂成形指数)与非创伤性孤立性SSC撕裂有显著相关性。除了年龄、腰围、优势侧受累、体力劳动、糖尿病、代谢综合征和肱二头肌肌腱损伤外,更大的盂后凸与创伤性孤立性SSC撕裂也有显著相关性(P≤0.013):结论:SGAX作为盂成形指数,是创伤性孤立性肩胛下肌腱撕裂的一个独立相关因素,盂后倾越大是此类撕裂的一个解剖学风险因素,此外还有过度使用相关因素,如优势侧参与和体力劳动,以及代谢因素,如肥胖、糖尿病、代谢综合征和肱二头肌肌腱损伤。
{"title":"Risk factors for atraumatic isolated subscapularis tear: glenoid retroversion.","authors":"Hyung Bin Park, Gyu-Min Lee, Ji Yong Gwark, Nitesh Gahlot, Jae-Boem Na","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.09.024","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.09.024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subscapularis tendon (SSC) tears have recently become an area of current research focus. However, the risk factors for atraumatic isolated SSC tears, particularly anatomical factors, remain poorly determined. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the associated factors contributing to isolated SSC tears.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved single shoulders of 605 subjects drawn from a cohort of rural residents. The inclusion criteria required each subject to sign an informed consent document and to have a complete clinical evaluation. The exclusion criteria comprised the absence of a complete magnetic resonance imaging study, current medication use that might have affected serum lipid levels, a history of shoulder trauma or surgery, and the presence of osteoarthritis, calcific tendinitis, frozen shoulder, or superior or posterosuperior rotator cuff tear. Diagnoses of isolated SSC tear were based on magnetic resonance imaging findings. Logistic regression analysis was conducted using demographic, physical, social, anatomical, comorbidities, and serological parameters. Anatomical variables included the supraspinatus fossa glenoid angle on axial (SGAX), a method to measure glenoid version, coracohumeral distance on axial and sagittal plans, and coracoid index. When multicollinearity among studied variables was detected, separate multivariable analyses were performed to address this issue, with each analysis including only one of those multicollinear variables along with the other significant variables obtained from univariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among anatomical variables, coracohumeral distance on axial and sagittal planes, as well as the coracoid index, did not show significant associations. However, SGAX, an index of glenoid version, was found to be significantly associated with atraumatic isolated SSC tears. Greater glenoid retroversion is significantly associated with atraumatic isolated SSC tears, along with age, waist circumference, dominant side involvement, manual labor, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and biceps tendon injury (P ≤ .013).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SGAX, serving as an index for glenoid version, is an independently associated factor for atraumatic isolated subscapularis tendon tears, with greater glenoid retroversion being an anatomical risk factor for these tears, along with overuse-related factors such as dominant-side involvement and manual labor, as well as metabolic factors such as obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and biceps tendon injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142693874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is The "Sling Effect" of the Conjoint Tendon in Latarjet Procedures Real? A Systematic Review and Descriptive Synthesis of Controlled Laboratory and Comparative Clinical Studies. Latarjet手术中联合肌腱的“吊索效应”是真实的吗?对照实验室和比较临床研究的系统综述和描述性综合。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.007
Kevin A Hao, Timothy R Buchanan, Victoria E Bindi, Jonathon J Dang, Arman Tabarestani, Justin Leal, Kevin W Farmer, Ryan P Roach, Xinning Li, Bradley S Schoch, Joseph J King, Keegan M Hones

Background: The Latarjet procedure is considered the gold standard for treating patients with anterior shoulder instability in the presence of critical glenoid bone loss. Proponents of the Latarjet contend that its efficacy is in-part attributable to the "sling effect" of the conjoint tendon; however, recent studies have demonstrated similar restoration of anterior stability in patients undergoing free bone block (FBB) procedures. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the biomechanical and clinical evidence for the sling effect.

Methods: A systematic review was performed per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried separately for (1) controlled laboratory studies comparing the restoration of anterior stability with and without an intact, tensioned conjoint tendon and (2) comparative clinical studies comparing patient outcomes after Latarjet versus a FBB procedure. A descriptive synthesis of the controlled laboratory studies and a quantitative meta-analysis of comparative clinical studies was performed.

Results: Six controlled laboratory studies and four comparative clinical studies were included. Four of the laboratory studies supported the presence of a sling effect, whereas two studies concluded there was no added effect; however, their data trended in favor of improved anterior stability with the sling effect. Meta-analysis of the four comparative clinical studies demonstrated no difference between Latarjet and FBB for any range of motion measure, outcome score, or the odds of recurrent instability (Odds ratio: 0.83, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-3.52), which is concordant with the findings of each individual study.

Conclusion: While both Latarjet and FBB procedures are efficacious in restoring stability, our critical review of the literature suggests that the reduction in anterior translation attributed to the "sling effect" in biomechanical cadaveric studies is not clinically relevant when sufficient anterior glenoid bone has been restored.

背景:Latarjet手术被认为是治疗存在严重肩关节骨丢失的前肩不稳患者的金标准。Latarjet的支持者认为其疗效部分归因于关节肌腱的“吊索效应”;然而,最近的研究表明,在接受游离骨阻滞(FBB)手术的患者中,前路稳定性的恢复类似。本系统综述的目的是评估吊索效应的生物力学和临床证据。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价。PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science和Cochrane分别查询了(1)对照实验室研究,比较了在完整拉伸的联合肌腱和不完整拉伸的情况下前路稳定性的恢复;(2)比较临床研究,比较了Latarjet和FBB手术后患者的结果。进行了对照实验室研究的描述性综合和比较临床研究的定量荟萃分析。结果:包括6项对照实验室研究和4项比较临床研究。其中四项实验室研究支持吊带效应的存在,而两项研究得出结论,没有额外的影响;然而,他们的数据倾向于支持通过吊带效应改善前路稳定性。四项比较临床研究的荟萃分析显示,Latarjet和FBB在任何活动范围测量、结局评分或复发不稳定的几率方面均无差异(优势比:0.83,95%可信区间:0.20-3.52),这与每个单独研究的结果一致。结论:虽然Latarjet和FBB手术在恢复稳定性方面都是有效的,但我们对文献的批判性回顾表明,在生物力学尸体研究中,由于“吊带效应”导致的前平移减少在足够的前盂骨恢复后并不具有临床意义。
{"title":"Is The \"Sling Effect\" of the Conjoint Tendon in Latarjet Procedures Real? A Systematic Review and Descriptive Synthesis of Controlled Laboratory and Comparative Clinical Studies.","authors":"Kevin A Hao, Timothy R Buchanan, Victoria E Bindi, Jonathon J Dang, Arman Tabarestani, Justin Leal, Kevin W Farmer, Ryan P Roach, Xinning Li, Bradley S Schoch, Joseph J King, Keegan M Hones","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Latarjet procedure is considered the gold standard for treating patients with anterior shoulder instability in the presence of critical glenoid bone loss. Proponents of the Latarjet contend that its efficacy is in-part attributable to the \"sling effect\" of the conjoint tendon; however, recent studies have demonstrated similar restoration of anterior stability in patients undergoing free bone block (FBB) procedures. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the biomechanical and clinical evidence for the sling effect.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried separately for (1) controlled laboratory studies comparing the restoration of anterior stability with and without an intact, tensioned conjoint tendon and (2) comparative clinical studies comparing patient outcomes after Latarjet versus a FBB procedure. A descriptive synthesis of the controlled laboratory studies and a quantitative meta-analysis of comparative clinical studies was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six controlled laboratory studies and four comparative clinical studies were included. Four of the laboratory studies supported the presence of a sling effect, whereas two studies concluded there was no added effect; however, their data trended in favor of improved anterior stability with the sling effect. Meta-analysis of the four comparative clinical studies demonstrated no difference between Latarjet and FBB for any range of motion measure, outcome score, or the odds of recurrent instability (Odds ratio: 0.83, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-3.52), which is concordant with the findings of each individual study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While both Latarjet and FBB procedures are efficacious in restoring stability, our critical review of the literature suggests that the reduction in anterior translation attributed to the \"sling effect\" in biomechanical cadaveric studies is not clinically relevant when sufficient anterior glenoid bone has been restored.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142933362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Utility of Radiographs for Asymptomatic Patients Following Primary Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. x线片在初次解剖和反向全肩关节置换术后无症状患者中的应用。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.010
David H Jung, Vincent Buckman, Nicholas A Carola, Darlington Nwaudo, Nicholas H Maassen, Lewis L Shi

Background: Radiographs are frequently obtained after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) to confirm implant placement and follow the status of the bone and prostheses; however, standardization of their use is lacking. There are concerns regarding frequent use of radiographs due to their cost and patient radiation exposure. The aim of this study is to assess the postoperative radiograph frequency and efficacy in primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. We hypothesize that multiple radiographs taken beyond the initial 2-week postoperative interval are of uncertain benefit for both primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasties, regardless of the presence of symptoms.

Methods: A retrospective chart and imaging review was conducted on all patients who underwent primary TSA between 2014 and 2021, with documentation of at least 2 years of follow-up. All available postoperative radiographs, radiologist interpretations, and clinic notes were followed up for 2 years after the date of surgery, or until another surgery was performed within the 2-year timeframe. Radiographs were assessed for component positioning, fractures, loosening, and dislocation. Clinic notes were also checked for changes in patient management. Patients were grouped by surgery type (anatomic/reverse).

Results: A total of 213 patients (234 surgeries) were identified (55 anatomic TSA, 179 reverse TSA). The mean number of radiographs within the first 2 years of surgery was 3.6 for anatomic TSA and 4.0 for reverse TSA. 166 patients were asymptomatic and had only 3 positive X-rays and zero revision rate in the first 2 years. No changes in management were implemented based on these routine radiographs. 68 surgeries were symptomatic, of which 21 had positive X-rays. Of this subgroup, 19 (90.5%) underwent revision.

Conclusion: Routine radiographs are overused and typically do not lead to any changes in asymptomatic patients in the first 2 years after TSA. For patients experiencing pain or limited range of motion, ongoing assessment using additional X-rays, CT scans, or other diagnostic tests is recommended for effective monitoring.

背景:全肩关节置换术(TSA)后经常需要x线片来确认植入物的位置,并跟踪骨和假体的状态;然而,它们的使用缺乏标准化。由于x光片的费用和患者的辐射暴露,人们对频繁使用x光片感到担忧。本研究的目的是评估原发性解剖和反向全肩关节置换术的术后x线片频率和疗效。我们假设,无论症状是否存在,术后最初2周间隔以外的多次x线片对原发性解剖和反向全肩关节置换术的益处都不确定。方法:对2014年至2021年间接受原发性TSA的所有患者进行回顾性图表和影像学回顾,并进行至少2年的随访记录。所有可用的术后x线片、放射科医生解释和临床记录在手术后随访2年,或直到在2年内进行另一次手术。x线片评估部件定位、骨折、松动和脱位。还检查了门诊记录,以了解患者管理的变化。患者按手术类型(解剖/反向)分组。结果:共发现213例患者(234例手术),其中解剖TSA 55例,反向TSA 179例。手术前2年内解剖TSA的平均x线片次数为3.6次,反向TSA的平均x线片次数为4.0次。166例患者无症状,前2年仅有3次x线阳性,复查率为零。在这些常规x线片的基础上,没有实施任何管理改变。68例手术有症状,其中21例x光阳性。在该亚组中,19例(90.5%)接受了翻修。结论:常规x线片被过度使用,通常不会导致无症状患者在TSA后的前2年内发生任何变化。对于出现疼痛或活动范围受限的患者,建议使用额外的x光片、CT扫描或其他诊断测试进行持续评估,以进行有效监测。
{"title":"Utility of Radiographs for Asymptomatic Patients Following Primary Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.","authors":"David H Jung, Vincent Buckman, Nicholas A Carola, Darlington Nwaudo, Nicholas H Maassen, Lewis L Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiographs are frequently obtained after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) to confirm implant placement and follow the status of the bone and prostheses; however, standardization of their use is lacking. There are concerns regarding frequent use of radiographs due to their cost and patient radiation exposure. The aim of this study is to assess the postoperative radiograph frequency and efficacy in primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. We hypothesize that multiple radiographs taken beyond the initial 2-week postoperative interval are of uncertain benefit for both primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasties, regardless of the presence of symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart and imaging review was conducted on all patients who underwent primary TSA between 2014 and 2021, with documentation of at least 2 years of follow-up. All available postoperative radiographs, radiologist interpretations, and clinic notes were followed up for 2 years after the date of surgery, or until another surgery was performed within the 2-year timeframe. Radiographs were assessed for component positioning, fractures, loosening, and dislocation. Clinic notes were also checked for changes in patient management. Patients were grouped by surgery type (anatomic/reverse).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 213 patients (234 surgeries) were identified (55 anatomic TSA, 179 reverse TSA). The mean number of radiographs within the first 2 years of surgery was 3.6 for anatomic TSA and 4.0 for reverse TSA. 166 patients were asymptomatic and had only 3 positive X-rays and zero revision rate in the first 2 years. No changes in management were implemented based on these routine radiographs. 68 surgeries were symptomatic, of which 21 had positive X-rays. Of this subgroup, 19 (90.5%) underwent revision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routine radiographs are overused and typically do not lead to any changes in asymptomatic patients in the first 2 years after TSA. For patients experiencing pain or limited range of motion, ongoing assessment using additional X-rays, CT scans, or other diagnostic tests is recommended for effective monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142933364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do We Need to Reconsider How We Gauge Success After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty? A Study of Thresholds Optimized for Patient Satisfaction Using the Simple Shoulder Test. 我们是否需要重新考虑解剖性全肩关节置换术成功与否的标准?使用简单肩部测试优化患者满意度阈值的研究。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.013
Noah J Quinlan, Suhas P Dasari, Behnam Sharareh, James G Levins, Anastasia J Whitson, Frederick A Matsen, Jason E Hsu

Background: Clinically important improvement after total shoulder arthroplasty is often assessed with shoulder-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) quantifying reduction in pain and restoration in function. It is unclear if commonly utilized threshold such as minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), or patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), represent optimal improvement from the patients' perspective. The objectives of this study were to utilize the Simple Shoulder Test to: 1) compare commonly utilized thresholds for change in score and final score to thresholds optimized to patient satisfaction using receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and 2) determine the impact of using different thresholds on reporting of independent predictors of successful outcome in terms of patient satisfaction.

Methods: This study included 406 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) patients from a longitudinally maintained database with two-year follow-up. Surveys included the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) and a satisfaction questionnaire. SST thresholds were calculated by commonly described techniques for MCID, SCB, %MPI (percentage of maximal possible improvement), and PASS. ROC curves were constructed to determine the optimal threshold of SST change in score (Change-ROC), final SST score (Final-ROC), and %MPI (%MPI-ROC) based on patient satisfaction. Youden's index (J) was calculated to determine each threshold's performance in maximizing sensitivity and specificity. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine predictors of surpassing selected threshold values.

Results: The thresholds with the highest Youden's index correlating best with patient satisfaction were %MPI-ROC (aTSA 61%, J=0.49; RnR 63% J=0.64) and Final-ROC (aTSA 9.5, J=0.48; RnR 9.5 J=0.60). Commonly utilized thresholds including MCID of 2.0 (J=0.21) and SCB of 2.7 (2.7) had the lowest Youden's index of the thresholds studied. Characteristics predictive of success varied substantially based on selected threshold.

Conclusions: Current thresholds commonly utilized to gauge success after aTSA have limited ability to predict success based on patient satisfaction using the Simple Shoulder Test. Given that focus in healthcare value is shifting towards patient satisfaction, optimal thresholds utilized to measure success after shoulder arthroplasty may require reconsideration.

背景:全肩关节置换术后的临床重要改善通常通过肩部特异性患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)来评估,量化疼痛减轻和功能恢复。目前尚不清楚通常使用的阈值,如最小临床重要差异(MCID)、实质性临床获益(SCB)或患者可接受症状状态(PASS),从患者的角度来看是否代表最佳改善。本研究的目的是利用简单肩部测试:1)比较常用的评分变化阈值和最终评分阈值与使用受试者手术特征(ROC)曲线分析优化的患者满意度阈值;2)确定使用不同阈值对患者满意度成功结局独立预测因子报告的影响。方法:本研究包括406例解剖性全肩关节置换术(aTSA)患者,随访时间为两年。调查包括简单肩部测试(SST)和满意度问卷。SST阈值通过常用的MCID、SCB、%MPI(最大可能改善百分比)和PASS技术计算。构建ROC曲线,根据患者满意度确定SST评分变化(change -ROC)、最终SST评分(final -ROC)和%MPI (%MPI-ROC)的最佳阈值。计算约登指数(J),以确定每个阈值在最大化灵敏度和特异性方面的表现。进行多变量分析以确定超过选定阈值的预测因子。结果:与患者满意度相关的约登指数最高的阈值为%MPI-ROC (aTSA 61%, J=0.49;RnR 63% J=0.64)和Final-ROC (aTSA 9.5, J=0.48;RnR 9.5 J=0.60)。常用的阈值MCID为2.0 (J=0.21), SCB为2.7(2.7),约登指数在所有阈值中最低。预测成功的特征根据所选择的阈值有很大的不同。结论:目前常用的用于评估aTSA术后成功的阈值,基于简单肩部测试的患者满意度来预测成功的能力有限。鉴于医疗保健价值的焦点正转向患者满意度,用于衡量肩关节置换术后成功的最佳阈值可能需要重新考虑。
{"title":"Do We Need to Reconsider How We Gauge Success After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty? A Study of Thresholds Optimized for Patient Satisfaction Using the Simple Shoulder Test.","authors":"Noah J Quinlan, Suhas P Dasari, Behnam Sharareh, James G Levins, Anastasia J Whitson, Frederick A Matsen, Jason E Hsu","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinically important improvement after total shoulder arthroplasty is often assessed with shoulder-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) quantifying reduction in pain and restoration in function. It is unclear if commonly utilized threshold such as minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), or patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), represent optimal improvement from the patients' perspective. The objectives of this study were to utilize the Simple Shoulder Test to: 1) compare commonly utilized thresholds for change in score and final score to thresholds optimized to patient satisfaction using receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and 2) determine the impact of using different thresholds on reporting of independent predictors of successful outcome in terms of patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 406 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) patients from a longitudinally maintained database with two-year follow-up. Surveys included the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) and a satisfaction questionnaire. SST thresholds were calculated by commonly described techniques for MCID, SCB, %MPI (percentage of maximal possible improvement), and PASS. ROC curves were constructed to determine the optimal threshold of SST change in score (Change-ROC), final SST score (Final-ROC), and %MPI (%MPI-ROC) based on patient satisfaction. Youden's index (J) was calculated to determine each threshold's performance in maximizing sensitivity and specificity. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine predictors of surpassing selected threshold values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The thresholds with the highest Youden's index correlating best with patient satisfaction were %MPI-ROC (aTSA 61%, J=0.49; RnR 63% J=0.64) and Final-ROC (aTSA 9.5, J=0.48; RnR 9.5 J=0.60). Commonly utilized thresholds including MCID of 2.0 (J=0.21) and SCB of 2.7 (2.7) had the lowest Youden's index of the thresholds studied. Characteristics predictive of success varied substantially based on selected threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current thresholds commonly utilized to gauge success after aTSA have limited ability to predict success based on patient satisfaction using the Simple Shoulder Test. Given that focus in healthcare value is shifting towards patient satisfaction, optimal thresholds utilized to measure success after shoulder arthroplasty may require reconsideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142933350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Access to shoulder arthroplasty in Australia: A balance of regulation, surveillance, and monitored efficacy to maximize patient outcome and optimum care. 澳大利亚肩关节置换术的可及性--兼顾监管、监督和疗效监测,最大限度地提高患者疗效和最佳护理。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.042
Michael J Sandow, David R J Gill

Prosthetic arthroplasty has emerged as a major contributor to the management of shoulder disorders. This paper outlines the situation in Australia regarding the process by which shoulder replacement devices are made available. Although entry of joint replacement devices to the Australian market is relatively unrestricted, they must be first approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration-based on safety and efficacy-to be legally used. In addition, to obtain a private insurance rebate (Prescribed List) and thus be commercially viable, the Federal Department of Health and Aged Care requires a more stringent benchmark of comparative clinical effectiveness and value for money. The AOANJRR (Australian Orthopaedic Associate National Joint Replacement Registry) records the implantation and possible revision of virtually all (>98%) major joint arthroplasties in Australia and plays an important role in informing surgeons about their implant selection, but also in identifying and highlighting devices with a higher than anticipated rate of revision. Although the increased cost of health care is placing pressure on health care systems around the world, in Australia, access to shoulder arthroplasty remains relatively unrestricted-but carefully controlled and monitored.

人工关节置换术已成为治疗肩关节疾病的主要手段。本文概述了澳大利亚肩关节置换器械的上市程序。虽然关节置换器械进入澳大利亚市场相对不受限制,但必须首先获得治疗用品管理局(TGA)基于安全性和有效性的批准,才能合法使用。此外,为了获得私人保险回扣(处方清单),从而实现商业上的可行性,联邦卫生与老年护理部对临床效果比较和性价比的基准要求更为严格。AOANJRR(澳大利亚骨科协会全国关节置换登记处)1 记录了澳大利亚几乎所有(>98%)主要关节置换术的植入情况和可能的翻修情况,在为外科医生提供植入物选择信息方面发挥着重要作用,同时也能识别和突出翻修率高于预期的器械。虽然医疗成本的增加给世界各地的医疗系统带来了压力,但在澳大利亚,肩关节置换术的使用仍相对不受限制,但会受到严格控制和监测。
{"title":"Access to shoulder arthroplasty in Australia: A balance of regulation, surveillance, and monitored efficacy to maximize patient outcome and optimum care.","authors":"Michael J Sandow, David R J Gill","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.042","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.042","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prosthetic arthroplasty has emerged as a major contributor to the management of shoulder disorders. This paper outlines the situation in Australia regarding the process by which shoulder replacement devices are made available. Although entry of joint replacement devices to the Australian market is relatively unrestricted, they must be first approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration-based on safety and efficacy-to be legally used. In addition, to obtain a private insurance rebate (Prescribed List) and thus be commercially viable, the Federal Department of Health and Aged Care requires a more stringent benchmark of comparative clinical effectiveness and value for money. The AOANJRR (Australian Orthopaedic Associate National Joint Replacement Registry) records the implantation and possible revision of virtually all (>98%) major joint arthroplasties in Australia and plays an important role in informing surgeons about their implant selection, but also in identifying and highlighting devices with a higher than anticipated rate of revision. Although the increased cost of health care is placing pressure on health care systems around the world, in Australia, access to shoulder arthroplasty remains relatively unrestricted-but carefully controlled and monitored.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"328-331"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142299743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of the open Latarjet procedure on shoulder kinematics and periscapular muscle activity 3 months postoperatively. 开放式 Latarjet 手术对术后三个月肩关节运动学和肩胛周围肌肉活动的影响。
IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.037
Matthieu Degot, Isabelle Rogowski, Yoann Blache, Lionel Neyton

Background: The debate surrounding the influence of the open Latarjet procedure on postoperative scapular motions persists, and there is no evidence regarding its effects on periscapular muscle activation. This study aimed to assess the short-term influence of the open Latarjet procedure on scapular kinematics and periscapular muscle activity during arm raising and lowering based on comparisons between patients and healthy athletes.

Methods: 22 healthy male athletes and 22 male athletes scheduled for glenohumeral stabilization surgery by the open Latarjet procedure were included. Scapular kinematics, periscapular muscle activities, and shoulder-related quality of life were recorded before surgery and 3 months postoperatively for the Latarjet group. For the healthy group, same assessments were performed 3 months apart. Bilateral differences in both scapular kinematics and periscapular muscle activation ratios and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) index were defined as dependent variables.

Results: Scapular kinematics of the operated shoulder, namely scapular upward/downward rotation, internal/external rotation, and anterior/posterior tilt recorded between 20° and 120° of humerothoracic elevation, showed no alterations 3 months after surgery (P > .05) and did not differ from those observed in healthy athletes (P > .05). Similarly, all periscapular muscle activations were not different within time and between groups (P > .05). The WOSI index of the operated shoulder was significantly improved postoperatively (871.9 ± 443.7 vs. 1346.3 ± 552.3) but remained higher than the WOSI indices of the nonoperated shoulder or those of the healthy group (52.7 ± 75.6).

Conclusions: This study emphasizes the short-term effects of the open Latarjet procedure, demonstrating an improvement in the shoulder-related quality of life 3 months after surgery. Notably, during this period, both kinematics and periscapular muscle activity remained consistent and similar to the patterns observed for healthy athletes.

背景:围绕开放式Latarjet手术对术后肩胛骨运动的影响的争论一直存在,而关于其对肩胛周围肌肉激活的影响却没有证据。本研究旨在通过对患者和健康运动员进行比较,评估开放式Latarjet手术在手臂抬起和放下时对肩胛骨运动学和肩胛周围肌肉活动的短期影响。在手术前和术后3个月,对Latarjet组的肩胛运动学、肩胛周围肌肉活动和肩部相关生活质量进行记录。对于健康组,同样的评估在术后3个月进行。双侧肩胛骨运动学和肩胛周围肌肉激活率的差异以及西安大略省肩关节不稳定(WOSI)指数被定义为因变量:手术后3个月,肩胛骨运动学,即肩胛骨上/下旋转、内/外旋转和前/后倾斜,在肱骨胸廓抬高20°至120°之间的记录没有变化(P>0.05),与健康运动员的记录也没有差异(P>0.05)。同样,所有肩胛周围肌肉的激活在不同时间和不同组别之间也没有差异(p>0.05)。手术组肩关节的 WOSI 指数在术后明显改善(871.9 ± 443.7 vs. 1346.3 ± 552.3),但仍高于未手术组或健康组的 WOSI 指数(52.7±75.6):本研究强调了开放式Latarjet手术的短期效果,表明术后3个月肩部相关生活质量有所改善。值得注意的是,在此期间,运动学和肩胛周围肌肉活动均保持一致,与健康运动员的活动模式相似。
{"title":"Effects of the open Latarjet procedure on shoulder kinematics and periscapular muscle activity 3 months postoperatively.","authors":"Matthieu Degot, Isabelle Rogowski, Yoann Blache, Lionel Neyton","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.037","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The debate surrounding the influence of the open Latarjet procedure on postoperative scapular motions persists, and there is no evidence regarding its effects on periscapular muscle activation. This study aimed to assess the short-term influence of the open Latarjet procedure on scapular kinematics and periscapular muscle activity during arm raising and lowering based on comparisons between patients and healthy athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>22 healthy male athletes and 22 male athletes scheduled for glenohumeral stabilization surgery by the open Latarjet procedure were included. Scapular kinematics, periscapular muscle activities, and shoulder-related quality of life were recorded before surgery and 3 months postoperatively for the Latarjet group. For the healthy group, same assessments were performed 3 months apart. Bilateral differences in both scapular kinematics and periscapular muscle activation ratios and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) index were defined as dependent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scapular kinematics of the operated shoulder, namely scapular upward/downward rotation, internal/external rotation, and anterior/posterior tilt recorded between 20° and 120° of humerothoracic elevation, showed no alterations 3 months after surgery (P > .05) and did not differ from those observed in healthy athletes (P > .05). Similarly, all periscapular muscle activations were not different within time and between groups (P > .05). The WOSI index of the operated shoulder was significantly improved postoperatively (871.9 ± 443.7 vs. 1346.3 ± 552.3) but remained higher than the WOSI indices of the nonoperated shoulder or those of the healthy group (52.7 ± 75.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study emphasizes the short-term effects of the open Latarjet procedure, demonstrating an improvement in the shoulder-related quality of life 3 months after surgery. Notably, during this period, both kinematics and periscapular muscle activity remained consistent and similar to the patterns observed for healthy athletes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"e22-e34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140862971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1