Pub Date : 2023-12-01DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.12000
Giacomo Rossettini, Chad Cook, Alvisa Palese, Paolo Pillastrini, Andrea Turolla
SYNOPSIS: Artificial intelligence (AI), specifically large language models (LLMs), which focus on the interaction between computers and human language, can influence musculoskeletal rehabilitation management. AI chatbots (eg, ChatGPT, Microsoft Bing, and Google Bard) are a form of large language models designed to understand, interpret, and generate text similar to what is produced by humans. Since their release, chatbots have triggered controversy in the international scientific community, including when they have passed university exams, generated credible scientific abstracts, and shown potential for replacing humans in scientific roles. The controversies extend to the field of musculoskeletal rehabilitation. In this Viewpoint, we describe the potential applications and limitations, and recommended actions for education, clinical practice, and research when using AI chatbots for musculoskeletal rehabilitation management, aspects that may have similar implications for the broader health care community. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):1-7. Epub 14 September 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12000.
{"title":"Pros and Cons of Using Artificial Intelligence Chatbots for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Management.","authors":"Giacomo Rossettini, Chad Cook, Alvisa Palese, Paolo Pillastrini, Andrea Turolla","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.12000","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.12000","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>SYNOPSIS:</b> Artificial intelligence (AI), specifically large language models (LLMs), which focus on the interaction between computers and human language, can influence musculoskeletal rehabilitation management. AI chatbots (eg, ChatGPT, Microsoft Bing, and Google Bard) are a form of large language models designed to understand, interpret, and generate text similar to what is produced by humans. Since their release, chatbots have triggered controversy in the international scientific community, including when they have passed university exams, generated credible scientific abstracts, and shown potential for replacing humans in scientific roles. The controversies extend to the field of musculoskeletal rehabilitation. In this Viewpoint, we describe the potential applications and limitations, and recommended actions for education, clinical practice, and research when using AI chatbots for musculoskeletal rehabilitation management, aspects that may have similar implications for the broader health care community. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):1-7. Epub 14 September 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12000</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"728-734"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10598744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.12090
Giovanni E Ferreira, Joshua R Zadro, Adrian C Traeger, Caitlin P Jones, Courtney A West, Mary O'Keeffe, Hazel Jenkins, James McAuley, Christopher G Maher
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of adding pain science or ergonomics messages to guideline advice on feelings of reassurance and management intentions among people with acute low back pain (LBP). DESIGN: Three-arm parallel-group randomized experiment. METHODS: We recruited people with acute LBP (pain for ≤6 weeks) to participate in an online experiment. Participants were randomized at a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three groups: guideline advice alone or guideline advice with the addition of brief pain science or ergonomics messages. The intervention was delivered via prerecorded videos in all 3 groups. Coprimary outcomes were reassurance that (1) no serious condition is causing LBP and (2) continuing with daily activities is safe. Secondary outcomes were perceived risk of developing chronic pain, management intentions (bed rest, see a health professional, see a specialist, and imaging), credibility, and relevance of the advice in addressing the participant's concerns. RESULTS: Two thousand two hundred ninety-seven responses (99.3% of 2,313 randomized) were analyzed. Adding brief pain science or ergonomics messages to guideline advice did not change reassurance that LBP was not caused by serious disease. The addition of ergonomics advice provided worse reassurance that it is safe to continue with daily activities compared to guideline advice (mean difference [MD], -0.33; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.53). There was no difference between groups on management intentions. CONCLUSION: Adding pain science or ergonomics messages to guideline advice did not increase reassurance or change management intentions in people with acute LBP. Ergonomics messages may lead to reduced feelings of reassurance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12)1-11. Epub 26 September 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12090.
{"title":"Adding Brief Pain Science or Ergonomics Messages to Guideline Advice Did Not Increase Feelings of Reassurance in People With Acute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Experiment.","authors":"Giovanni E Ferreira, Joshua R Zadro, Adrian C Traeger, Caitlin P Jones, Courtney A West, Mary O'Keeffe, Hazel Jenkins, James McAuley, Christopher G Maher","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.12090","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.12090","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To investigate the effects of adding pain science or ergonomics messages to guideline advice on feelings of reassurance and management intentions among people with acute low back pain (LBP). <b>DESIGN:</b> Three-arm parallel-group randomized experiment. <b>METHODS:</b> We recruited people with acute LBP (pain for ≤6 weeks) to participate in an online experiment. Participants were randomized at a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three groups: guideline advice alone or guideline advice with the addition of brief pain science or ergonomics messages. The intervention was delivered via prerecorded videos in all 3 groups. Coprimary outcomes were reassurance that (1) no serious condition is causing LBP and (2) continuing with daily activities is safe. Secondary outcomes were perceived risk of developing chronic pain, management intentions (bed rest, see a health professional, see a specialist, and imaging), credibility, and relevance of the advice in addressing the participant's concerns. <b>RESULTS:</b> Two thousand two hundred ninety-seven responses (99.3% of 2,313 randomized) were analyzed. Adding brief pain science or ergonomics messages to guideline advice did not change reassurance that LBP was not caused by serious disease. The addition of ergonomics advice provided worse reassurance that it is safe to continue with daily activities compared to guideline advice (mean difference [MD], -0.33; 95% CI: 0.13, 0.53). There was no difference between groups on management intentions. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Adding pain science or ergonomics messages to guideline advice did not increase reassurance or change management intentions in people with acute LBP. Ergonomics messages may lead to reduced feelings of reassurance. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12)1-11. Epub 26 September 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.12090</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"769-779"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41179093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11993
Lina Holm Ingelsrud, Berend Terluin, Jonas Bloch Thorlund, Julie Rønne Pedersen, Ewa M Roos
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the change in minimal important change (MIC), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and treatment failure (TF) thresholds for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) from 3 to 12 months following arthroscopic meniscus surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We included patients from the Knee Arthroscopy Cohort Southern Denmark who had meniscus surgery between 2013 and 2015. We calculated the interpretation threshold values for MIC, PASS, and TF using an anchor-based adjusted predictive modeling method. Thresholds at 3 and 12 months postoperatively were compared to evaluate changes over time. RESULTS: The proportions of people who reported a clinically relevant improvement, or their symptoms being acceptable, increased by 10% to 15% points from 3 to 12 months after surgery. MIC thresholds for the 5 KOOS subscales remained stable from 3 to 12 months with statistically nonsignificant differences (95% confidence intervals) ranging from -0.3 (-3.0, 2.6) to -2.4 (-6.1, 1.3). All PASS thresholds except for quality of life (QOL) decreased by -6.5 (-11.8, -1.5) to -3.7 (-7.1, -0.4) points, indicating that higher symptom levels were accepted at 12 months. In contrast, the proportion reporting their treatment to have failed remained stable over time (19% and 17%). For QOL, a 7.4 (2.0, 13.2) higher TF threshold at 12 months suggested that improved QOL was required to not consider that the treatment had failed. CONCLUSION: More patients reported being improved at 1 year compared to at 3 months following meniscus surgery. The KOOS MIC thresholds were stable over time, whereas time-specific PASS values should be applied after meniscus surgery. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):685-702. Epub 3 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11993.
{"title":"Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Interpretation Thresholds at 3 and 12 Months After Arthroscopic Meniscal Surgery. What Changes, and What Stays the Same?","authors":"Lina Holm Ingelsrud, Berend Terluin, Jonas Bloch Thorlund, Julie Rønne Pedersen, Ewa M Roos","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11993","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11993","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To evaluate the change in minimal important change (MIC), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and treatment failure (TF) thresholds for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) from 3 to 12 months following arthroscopic meniscus surgery. <b>DESIGN:</b> Retrospective cohort study. <b>METHODS:</b> We included patients from the Knee Arthroscopy Cohort Southern Denmark who had meniscus surgery between 2013 and 2015. We calculated the interpretation threshold values for MIC, PASS, and TF using an anchor-based adjusted predictive modeling method. Thresholds at 3 and 12 months postoperatively were compared to evaluate changes over time. <b>RESULTS:</b> The proportions of people who reported a clinically relevant improvement, or their symptoms being acceptable, increased by 10% to 15% points from 3 to 12 months after surgery. MIC thresholds for the 5 KOOS subscales remained stable from 3 to 12 months with statistically nonsignificant differences (95% confidence intervals) ranging from -0.3 (-3.0, 2.6) to -2.4 (-6.1, 1.3). All PASS thresholds except for quality of life (QOL) decreased by -6.5 (-11.8, -1.5) to -3.7 (-7.1, -0.4) points, indicating that higher symptom levels were accepted at 12 months. In contrast, the proportion reporting their treatment to have failed remained stable over time (19% and 17%). For QOL, a 7.4 (2.0, 13.2) higher TF threshold at 12 months suggested that improved QOL was required to not consider that the treatment had failed. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> More patients reported being improved at 1 year compared to at 3 months following meniscus surgery. The KOOS MIC thresholds were stable over time, whereas time-specific PASS values should be applied after meniscus surgery. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):685-702. Epub 3 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11993</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"685-702"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41150639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Letter to the Editor-in-Chief in response to JOSPT article "The Relationship Between Neck Strength and Sports-Related Concussion in Team Sports: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis" by Garrett JM et al. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):726. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0204.
致主编的信,以回应JOSPT的文章“团队运动中颈部力量与运动相关脑震荡之间的关系:Meta分析的系统综述”,作者Garrett JM et al.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):726。doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0204。
{"title":"Asking the Right Question Is Key to Getting a Valuable Answer.","authors":"Matthew S Tenan","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.0204","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.0204","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Letter to the Editor-in-Chief in response to <i>JOSPT</i> article \"The Relationship Between Neck Strength and Sports-Related Concussion in Team Sports: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis\" by Garrett JM et al. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):726. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0204</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"53 11","pages":"726"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71428568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11835
Meghan L Critchley, Stephan Bonfield, Reed Ferber, Kati Pasanen, Sarah J Kenny
OBJECTIVE: To examine modifiable and nonmodifiable factors for associations with dance-related injury among preprofessional ballet dancers over 5 academic years. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Full-time preprofessional ballet dancers (n = 452; 399 female; median age [range], 15 years [11-21]) participated across 5 academic years at a vocational school. Participants completed baseline screening and online weekly injury questionnaires including dance exposure (hours/week). Zero-inflated Poisson regression models were used to examine associations between potential risk factors measured at baseline and self-reported dance-related injury. RESULTS: In count model coefficients, left one leg standing score (log coefficient estimate, -0.249 [95% CI: -0.478, -0.02]; P = .033) and right unipedal dynamic balance time (log coefficient estimate, -0.0294 [95% CI: -0.048, -0.01]; P>.001) carried a protective effect with increased years of training when adjusted for Athletic Coping Skills Inventory (ACSI) score. A significant association was found for left unipedal dynamic balance time and dance-related injury (log coefficient estimate, 0.013 [95% CI: 0.000, 0.026]; P = .045) when adjusted for years of training and ACSI score. There were no significant associations between dance-related injury and ankle and hip range of motion, active straight leg raise, or Y Balance Test measures. CONCLUSION: When adjusted for years of previous dance training and psychological coping skills, there was a significant association between limb-specific lumbopelvic control and dynamic balance tasks, as well as self-reported dance-related injury in preprofessional ballet. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):703-711. Epub 3 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11835.
{"title":"Relationships Between Common Preseason Screening Measures and Dance-Related Injuries in Preprofessional Ballet Dancers.","authors":"Meghan L Critchley, Stephan Bonfield, Reed Ferber, Kati Pasanen, Sarah J Kenny","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11835","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11835","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To examine modifiable and nonmodifiable factors for associations with dance-related injury among preprofessional ballet dancers over 5 academic years. <b>DESIGN:</b> Prospective cohort study. <b>METHODS:</b> Full-time preprofessional ballet dancers (n = 452; 399 female; median age [range], 15 years [11-21]) participated across 5 academic years at a vocational school. Participants completed baseline screening and online weekly injury questionnaires including dance exposure (hours/week). Zero-inflated Poisson regression models were used to examine associations between potential risk factors measured at baseline and self-reported dance-related injury. <b>RESULTS:</b> In count model coefficients, left one leg standing score (log coefficient estimate, -0.249 [95% CI: -0.478, -0.02]; <i>P</i> = .033) and right unipedal dynamic balance time (log coefficient estimate, -0.0294 [95% CI: -0.048, -0.01]; <i>P</i>>.001) carried a protective effect with increased years of training when adjusted for Athletic Coping Skills Inventory (ACSI) score. A significant association was found for left unipedal dynamic balance time and dance-related injury (log coefficient estimate, 0.013 [95% CI: 0.000, 0.026]; <i>P</i> = .045) when adjusted for years of training and ACSI score. There were no significant associations between dance-related injury and ankle and hip range of motion, active straight leg raise, or Y Balance Test measures. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> When adjusted for years of previous dance training and psychological coping skills, there was a significant association between limb-specific lumbopelvic control and dynamic balance tasks, as well as self-reported dance-related injury in preprofessional ballet. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):703-711. Epub 3 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11835</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"703-711"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41122766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11853
Chad E Cook, Geronimo Bejarano, Jennifer Reneker, Andrew D Vigotsky, Daniel L Riddle
SYNOPSIS: Responder analyses are methods for analyzing randomized controlled trials, which purport to identify individuals or subgroups of study participants who experienced a "clinically meaningful" improvement from a treatment. Unfortunately, responder analyses have numerous methodological shortcomings, which preclude inferences concerning individual response to treatments and, thus, adoption into clinical practice. In this Viewpoint, we summarize 2 major limitations of responder analyses: (1) their thresholds of success involve arbitrary criteria and (2) responder analyses do not capture true individual treatment effects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(XX):1-3. Epub: 20 June 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11853.
{"title":"Responder Analyses: A Methodological Mess.","authors":"Chad E Cook, Geronimo Bejarano, Jennifer Reneker, Andrew D Vigotsky, Daniel L Riddle","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11853","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11853","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>SYNOPSIS:</b> Responder analyses are methods for analyzing randomized controlled trials, which purport to identify individuals or subgroups of study participants who experienced a \"clinically meaningful\" improvement from a treatment. Unfortunately, responder analyses have numerous methodological shortcomings, which preclude inferences concerning individual response to treatments and, thus, adoption into clinical practice. In this Viewpoint, we summarize 2 major limitations of responder analyses: (1) their thresholds of success involve arbitrary criteria and (2) responder analyses do not capture true individual treatment effects. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(XX):1-3. Epub: 20 June 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11853</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"0 9","pages":"652-654"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9796221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.0204-R
Joel M Garrett, Kerry Peek, Daniel J Hoek, Marco Mastrorocco, Thomas B McGuckian
Author response to the JOSPT Letter to the Editor-in-Chief "Asking the Right Question is Key to Getting a Valuable Answer" J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):726-727. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0204-R.
{"title":"Reply to \"Asking the Right Question Is Key to Getting a Valuable Answer\".","authors":"Joel M Garrett, Kerry Peek, Daniel J Hoek, Marco Mastrorocco, Thomas B McGuckian","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.0204-R","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.0204-R","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Author response to the <i>JOSPT</i> Letter to the Editor-in-Chief \"Asking the Right Question is Key to Getting a Valuable Answer\" <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):726-727. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0204-R</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"53 11","pages":"726-727"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71428570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11984
Travis Haber, Michelle Hall, Fiona Dobson, Belinda J Lawford, Fiona McManus, Karen E Lamb, Rana S Hinman
OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of diagnostic labels and their explanations on people's beliefs about managing hip pain. DESIGN: Online randomized controlled trial involving 626 participants. METHODS: Participants aged ≥45 years with and without hip pain considered a hypothetical scenario (initial doctor consultation for hip pain). They were randomized to receive a diagnostic label and explanation of (1) hip osteoarthritis, (2) persistent hip pain, or (3) hip degeneration. Primary outcomes were the beliefs (1) exercise would damage the hip and (2) surgery is necessary at some stage (scales, 0 = definitely would not/unnecessary, 10 = definitely would/necessary). Secondary outcomes included beliefs about other treatments and care providers. RESULTS: Compared to hip degeneration, participants who were allocated to hip osteoarthritis and persistent hip pain believed exercise was less damaging (mean difference -1.3 [95% CI: -1.9, -0.7] and -1.8 [-2.3, -1.2], respectively) and surgery less necessary (-1.5 [-2.1, -1.0] and -2.2 [-2.7, -1.6], respectively). Compared to hip osteoarthritis, participants who were allocated to persistent hip pain believed surgery was less necessary (-0.7 [-1.2, -0.1]), but not that exercise was less damaging (-0.5 [-1.1, 0.1]). Compared to hip degeneration, participants who were allocated to hip osteoarthritis and persistent hip pain were less concerned about their hip and believed exercise and care from an exercise and sports physician, rheumatologist, or physiotherapist would be more helpful, and care from an orthopaedic surgeon less helpful. CONCLUSIONS: People who were allocated a diagnostic label and explanation of hip osteoarthritis or persistent hip pain believed exercise was less damaging and surgery less necessary for a hip problem than hip degeneration. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):673-684. Epub 5 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11984.
{"title":"Effects of Hip Pain Diagnostic Labels and Their Explanations on Beliefs About Hip Pain and How to Manage It: An Online Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Travis Haber, Michelle Hall, Fiona Dobson, Belinda J Lawford, Fiona McManus, Karen E Lamb, Rana S Hinman","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11984","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11984","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVES:</b> To compare the effects of diagnostic labels and their explanations on people's beliefs about managing hip pain. <b>DESIGN:</b> Online randomized controlled trial involving 626 participants. <b>METHODS:</b> Participants aged ≥45 years with and without hip pain considered a hypothetical scenario (initial doctor consultation for hip pain). They were randomized to receive a diagnostic label and explanation of (1) <i>hip osteoarthritis</i>, (2) <i>persistent hip pain</i>, or (3) <i>hip degeneration</i>. Primary outcomes were the beliefs (1) exercise would damage the hip and (2) surgery is necessary at some stage (scales, 0 = definitely would not/unnecessary, 10 = definitely would/necessary). Secondary outcomes included beliefs about other treatments and care providers. <b>RESULTS:</b> Compared to <i>hip degeneration</i>, participants who were allocated to <i>hip osteoarthritis</i> and <i>persistent hip pain</i> believed exercise was less damaging (mean difference -1.3 [95% CI: -1.9, -0.7] and -1.8 [-2.3, -1.2], respectively) and surgery less necessary (-1.5 [-2.1, -1.0] and -2.2 [-2.7, -1.6], respectively). Compared to hip osteoarthritis, participants who were allocated to <i>persistent hip pain</i> believed surgery was less necessary (-0.7 [-1.2, -0.1]), but not that exercise was less damaging (-0.5 [-1.1, 0.1]). Compared to hip degeneration, participants who were allocated to <i>hip osteoarthritis</i> and <i>persistent hip pain</i> were less concerned about their hip and believed exercise and care from an exercise and sports physician, rheumatologist, or physiotherapist would be more helpful, and care from an orthopaedic surgeon less helpful. <b>CONCLUSIONS:</b> People who were allocated a diagnostic label and explanation of hip osteoarthritis or persistent hip pain believed exercise was less damaging and surgery less necessary for a hip problem than hip degeneration. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):673-684. Epub 5 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11984</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"673-684"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41151245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2023.11858
Louise Drysdale, Zara Gomes, Liam Toohey, Kate Pumpa, Phil Newman
OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidence rate, frequency, severity, recurrence, and burden of musculoskeletal injury in professional ballet. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiological (retrospective). METHODS: Professional dancers (n = 73, 40 females, 33 males) provided consent for retrospective review of musculoskeletal injury data. Medical-attention injuries were reported to and recorded by onsite physiotherapists between January 2018 and December 2021. Time-loss injuries were any injury that prevented a dancer from taking a full part in all dance-related activities for >1 day. Injuries were classified using the OSICS-10.1 system. Injury incidence rates (IIRs; injuries/1000 h), severity, recurrence, and burden were calculated. RESULTS: Nine hundred and fifty-three medical-attention injuries were recorded in 72 (98%) dancers at an IIR of 2.79/1000 h (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.62-2.98). 706 were time-loss injuries, which were reported in 70 dancers at an IIR of 2.07/1000 h (95% CI: 1.92, 2.23). Overuse injuries represented 53% of medical-attention injuries. The most frequently injured body area and tissue/pathology were thoracic facet joint (n = 63/953, 7%) and ankle synovitis/impingement (n = 62/953, 6%). Bone stress injuries (BSIs) were the most severe with the highest median time loss (135 days, interquartile range [IQR] 181) followed by fractures (72.5 days, IQR 132). The injuries with the highest burden were tibial BSIs (13 days lost/1000 h; 95% CI: 13, 14). Jumping and lifting were the most frequently reported injury mechanisms. CONCLUSION: Almost all dancers required medical attention for at least one injury during the surveillance period. Approximately 74% of injuries resulted in time loss. BSIs and ankle synovitis/impingement were of high burden, and a high proportion of BSIs were recurrent. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):712-722. Epub 14 September 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11858.
{"title":"Musculoskeletal Injury in an Australian Professional Ballet Company, 2018-2021: 953 Medical-Attention and 706 Time-Loss Injuries Over 4 Years.","authors":"Louise Drysdale, Zara Gomes, Liam Toohey, Kate Pumpa, Phil Newman","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11858","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11858","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVES:</b> To describe the incidence rate, frequency, severity, recurrence, and burden of musculoskeletal injury in professional ballet. <b>STUDY DESIGN:</b> Descriptive epidemiological (retrospective). <b>METHODS:</b> Professional dancers (n = 73, 40 females, 33 males) provided consent for retrospective review of musculoskeletal injury data. Medical-attention injuries were reported to and recorded by onsite physiotherapists between January 2018 and December 2021. Time-loss injuries were any injury that prevented a dancer from taking a full part in all dance-related activities for >1 day<i>.</i> Injuries were classified using the OSICS-10.1 system. Injury incidence rates (IIRs; injuries/1000 h), severity, recurrence, and burden were calculated. <b>RESULTS:</b> Nine hundred and fifty-three medical-attention injuries were recorded in 72 (98%) dancers at an IIR of 2.79/1000 h (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.62-2.98). 706 were time-loss injuries, which were reported in 70 dancers at an IIR of 2.07/1000 h (95% CI: 1.92, 2.23). Overuse injuries represented 53% of medical-attention injuries. The most frequently injured body area and tissue/pathology were thoracic facet joint (n = 63/953, 7%) and ankle synovitis/impingement (n = 62/953, 6%). Bone stress injuries (BSIs) were the most severe with the highest median time loss (135 days, interquartile range [IQR] 181) followed by fractures (72.5 days, IQR 132). The injuries with the highest burden were tibial BSIs (13 days lost/1000 h; 95% CI: 13, 14). Jumping and lifting were the most frequently reported injury mechanisms. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Almost all dancers required medical attention for at least one injury during the surveillance period. Approximately 74% of injuries resulted in time loss. BSIs and ankle synovitis/impingement were of high burden, and a high proportion of BSIs were recurrent. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):712-722. Epub 14 September 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11858</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"712-722"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10233030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gabriel Peixoto Leão Almeida, João Felipe Miranda Rios
Letter to the Editor-in-Chief in response to JOSPT article "Are changes in dynamic knee movement control related to changes in pain or function in people with knee disorders?" by Nunes GS, de Moraes WSLA, de Souza Sampaio V, et al. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):1. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0203.
{"title":"Lower-Limb Kinematics and Clinical Outcomes: Correlation Does Not Imply Causality.","authors":"Gabriel Peixoto Leão Almeida, João Felipe Miranda Rios","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.0203","DOIUrl":"10.2519/jospt.2023.0203","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Letter to the Editor-in-Chief in response to <i>JOSPT</i> article \"Are changes in dynamic knee movement control related to changes in pain or function in people with knee disorders?\" by Nunes GS, de Moraes WSLA, de Souza Sampaio V, et al. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(11):1. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0203</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"0 11","pages":"723"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41155736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}