首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics最新文献

英文 中文
Improving Comprehension of Consent Forms in Online Research: An Empirical Test of Four Interventions. 提高在线研究中对同意书的理解:对四种干预措施的实证检验。
IF 1.7 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-14 DOI: 10.1177/15562646251321132
Naomi K Grant, Leah K Hamilton, Jenalyn M Ormita

Informed consent is a guiding ethical principle when conducting research involving human participants. Yet, consent forms are often skimmed or ignored, jeopardizing informed consent. In two experiments, we test four interventions designed to encourage participants to read online consent forms more carefully. Experiment 1 employed a 2 (length: short or long) by 2 (timing: fixed or free) by 2 (quiz: present or absent) between-participants design. We measured instruction-following and comprehension of the consent form. Results showed that fixed timing and a quiz led to greater instruction-following, but consent form length had no effect. Experiment 2 employed a 2 (length: short or long) by 3 (delivery format: live, audiovisual, standard written) between-participants design. Once again, length had no effect, but both live and audiovisual formats increased instruction-following and comprehension. We recommend that researchers consider using fixed timing, adding a quiz, and/or using alternative delivery formats to help participants make an informed decision.

在进行涉及人类参与者的研究时,知情同意是一项指导道德原则。然而,知情同意书往往被略读或忽视,危及知情同意。在两个实验中,我们测试了四种干预措施,旨在鼓励参与者更仔细地阅读在线同意书。实验1采用2(长度:短或长)× 2(时间:固定或自由)× 2(测验:出席或缺席)的被试设计。我们测量了他们对同意书的理解程度。结果表明,固定的时间和测验能让学生更好地遵循指示,但同意书的长度没有影响。实验2采用2(长度:短或长)× 3(传递形式:现场、视听、标准书面)的参与者间设计。再一次,长度没有影响,但现场和视听形式都增加了指令遵循和理解。我们建议研究人员考虑使用固定的时间,增加测验,和/或使用替代的交付格式来帮助参与者做出明智的决定。
{"title":"Improving Comprehension of Consent Forms in Online Research: An Empirical Test of Four Interventions.","authors":"Naomi K Grant, Leah K Hamilton, Jenalyn M Ormita","doi":"10.1177/15562646251321132","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15562646251321132","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Informed consent is a guiding ethical principle when conducting research involving human participants. Yet, consent forms are often skimmed or ignored, jeopardizing informed consent. In two experiments, we test four interventions designed to encourage participants to read online consent forms more carefully. Experiment 1 employed a 2 (length: short or long) by 2 (timing: fixed or free) by 2 (quiz: present or absent) between-participants design. We measured instruction-following and comprehension of the consent form. Results showed that fixed timing and a quiz led to greater instruction-following, but consent form length had no effect. Experiment 2 employed a 2 (length: short or long) by 3 (delivery format: live, audiovisual, standard written) between-participants design. Once again, length had no effect, but both live and audiovisual formats increased instruction-following and comprehension. We recommend that researchers consider using fixed timing, adding a quiz, and/or using alternative delivery formats to help participants make an informed decision.</p>","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"46-54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048739/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143626714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identifying Strategies for Strengthening Behavioral and Social Science Research Study Conduct. 确定加强行为和社会科学研究学习行为的策略。
IF 1.7 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI: 10.1177/15562646241302396
Susan L Murphy, Timothy C Guetterman, Elizabeth K Haro, Sana Shakour

Behavioral and social science research (BSSR) studies are less stringently regulated compared to drug and device studies. At our university, internal quality assurance activities revealed BSSR studies have more, but similar, issues compared to other studies. However, most institutional resources are tailored to support drug and device research, leaving an evidence gap regarding effective strategies for fostering rigorous BSSR study conduct. Two campus units partnered to undertake a two-phase study. First, we characterized compliance issues based on BSSR study audit data. Second, we conducted interviews with behavioral researchers and others to discuss contributors to compliance issues and potential mitigating strategies. Through thematic analysis, we identified problems at that can be addressed at individual, study team, and university systems levels. Study results outline potential strategies to reduce compliance issues.

与药物和器械研究相比,行为和社会科学研究(BSSR)的研究没有那么严格的监管。在我校的内部质量保证活动中发现,与其他研究相比,BSSR研究存在更多但相似的问题。然而,大多数机构资源都是为支持药物和器械研究而量身定制的,在培养严格的BSSR研究行为的有效策略方面留下了证据缺口。两个校园单位合作进行了两阶段的研究。首先,我们基于BSSR研究审计数据对合规问题进行了表征。其次,我们对行为研究人员和其他人进行了访谈,以讨论导致依从性问题的因素和潜在的缓解策略。通过专题分析,我们发现了可以在个人、学习团队和大学系统层面解决的问题。研究结果概述了减少依从性问题的潜在策略。
{"title":"Identifying Strategies for Strengthening Behavioral and Social Science Research Study Conduct.","authors":"Susan L Murphy, Timothy C Guetterman, Elizabeth K Haro, Sana Shakour","doi":"10.1177/15562646241302396","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15562646241302396","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Behavioral and social science research (BSSR) studies are less stringently regulated compared to drug and device studies. At our university, internal quality assurance activities revealed BSSR studies have more, but similar, issues compared to other studies. However, most institutional resources are tailored to support drug and device research, leaving an evidence gap regarding effective strategies for fostering rigorous BSSR study conduct. Two campus units partnered to undertake a two-phase study. First, we characterized compliance issues based on BSSR study audit data. Second, we conducted interviews with behavioral researchers and others to discuss contributors to compliance issues and potential mitigating strategies. Through thematic analysis, we identified problems at that can be addressed at individual, study team, and university systems levels. Study results outline potential strategies to reduce compliance issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"29-37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048268/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142848153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validating the Attitudes Toward Plagiarism Scale and Examining the Interrelationships among its Constructs. 抄袭态度量表的验证及其构念间的相互关系。
IF 1.7 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI: 10.1177/15562646251327541
Md Atikuzzaman, S M Zabed Ahmed

This study validates the Attitudes Toward Plagiarism (ATP) scale and investigates the interrelationships among its three constructs: positive attitudes, negative attitudes, and subjective norms regarding plagiarism. Data were collected from 720 students across two universities in Bangladesh. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on data from one university (n = 412), followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on data from another university (n = 308). The EFA extracted 20 items from the original 29-item ATP scale, while the CFA retained a 17-item version. Both analyses confirmed the ATP's original three-factor structure. Pearson's correlation and structural equation modeling (SEM) were performed using the total sample (n = 720) to examine the relationships among the constructs. The results of Pearson's correlation showed significant positive correlations among the ATP constructs. SEM analysis revealed that subjective norms significantly influenced positive attitudes, and positive attitudes significantly mediated the relationship between subjective norms and negative attitudes toward plagiarism.

本研究对抄袭态度(ATP)量表进行了验证,并探讨了其三个构式:对抄袭的积极态度、消极态度和主观规范之间的相互关系。数据收集自孟加拉国两所大学的720名学生。对一所大学(n = 412)的数据进行探索性因子分析(EFA),然后对另一所大学(n = 308)的数据进行验证性因子分析(CFA)。EFA从原来的29项ATP量表中提取了20项,而CFA保留了17项的版本。两种分析都证实了ATP原来的三因子结构。使用总样本(n = 720)进行Pearson相关和结构方程模型(SEM)来检验结构之间的关系。Pearson相关分析结果显示ATP结构之间存在显著正相关。SEM分析发现,主观规范显著影响学生对抄袭行为的积极态度,积极态度显著中介主观规范与消极态度之间的关系。
{"title":"Validating the Attitudes Toward Plagiarism Scale and Examining the Interrelationships among its Constructs.","authors":"Md Atikuzzaman, S M Zabed Ahmed","doi":"10.1177/15562646251327541","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15562646251327541","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study validates the Attitudes Toward Plagiarism (ATP) scale and investigates the interrelationships among its three constructs: positive attitudes, negative attitudes, and subjective norms regarding plagiarism. Data were collected from 720 students across two universities in Bangladesh. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on data from one university (<i>n </i>= 412), followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on data from another university (<i>n </i>= 308). The EFA extracted 20 items from the original 29-item ATP scale, while the CFA retained a 17-item version. Both analyses confirmed the ATP's original three-factor structure. Pearson's correlation and structural equation modeling (SEM) were performed using the total sample (<i>n </i>= 720) to examine the relationships among the constructs. The results of Pearson's correlation showed significant positive correlations among the ATP constructs. SEM analysis revealed that subjective norms significantly influenced positive attitudes, and positive attitudes significantly mediated the relationship between subjective norms and negative attitudes toward plagiarism.</p>","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"71-83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143651692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Characteristics, Motivations, and Preferences of Healthy Volunteers in Phase I Clinical Trials in Sweden. 瑞典I期临床试验中健康志愿者的特征、动机和偏好
IF 1.7 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI: 10.1177/15562646241309142
Erik Rein-Hedin, Mårten Schultzberg, Folke Sjöberg, Fredrik Huss

This study examined the characteristics, experiences, motivations, and preferences of healthy volunteers participating in Phase I clinical trials in Sweden. A descriptive, cross-sectional survey was conducted among 135 healthy volunteers who had participated in at least one Phase I clinical trial from 2021 to 2024. Volunteers considered trial personnel, financial compensation, and regulatory review and approval as highly important factors in their decision to participate. Willingness to participate varied depending on trial characteristics, with greater reluctance for trials involving discomfort or perceived higher risks. Experiences, motivations, and preferences were comparable irrespective of age, gender, occupation, or income. Participants had disproportionately low incomes but reported financial satisfaction comparable to the general population. Unlike findings in other regions, there was no overrepresentation of migrants or the unemployed. Insights from this study can help guide trial design considerations to facilitate equitable recruitment and reduce the burden of participation.

本研究考察了在瑞典参加一期临床试验的健康志愿者的特征、经历、动机和偏好。研究人员对135名健康志愿者进行了一项描述性横断面调查,这些志愿者在2021年至2024年期间至少参加了一项I期临床试验。志愿者认为,试验人员、经济补偿、监管审查和批准是他们决定参加试验的重要因素。受试者的参与意愿因试验特点而异,对于不舒服或风险较高的试验,受试者更不愿意参与。无论年龄、性别、职业或收入如何,经历、动机和偏好都具有可比性。参与者的收入低得不成比例,但报告的财务满意度与一般人群相当。与其他地区的调查结果不同,该地区的移民或失业人数并未过多。本研究的见解可以帮助指导试验设计考虑,以促进公平招募和减轻参与负担。
{"title":"Characteristics, Motivations, and Preferences of Healthy Volunteers in Phase I Clinical Trials in Sweden.","authors":"Erik Rein-Hedin, Mårten Schultzberg, Folke Sjöberg, Fredrik Huss","doi":"10.1177/15562646241309142","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15562646241309142","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the characteristics, experiences, motivations, and preferences of healthy volunteers participating in Phase I clinical trials in Sweden. A descriptive, cross-sectional survey was conducted among 135 healthy volunteers who had participated in at least one Phase I clinical trial from 2021 to 2024. Volunteers considered trial personnel, financial compensation, and regulatory review and approval as highly important factors in their decision to participate. Willingness to participate varied depending on trial characteristics, with greater reluctance for trials involving discomfort or perceived higher risks. Experiences, motivations, and preferences were comparable irrespective of age, gender, occupation, or income. Participants had disproportionately low incomes but reported financial satisfaction comparable to the general population. Unlike findings in other regions, there was no overrepresentation of migrants or the unemployed. Insights from this study can help guide trial design considerations to facilitate equitable recruitment and reduce the burden of participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"59-70"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12052933/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143048453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How Making Consent Procedures More Interactive can Improve Informed Consent: An Experimental Study and Replication. 让同意程序更具互动性如何改善知情同意:实验研究与复制》。
IF 1.7 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1177/15562646241280208
Marije Aan Het Rot, Ineke Wessel

Prospective research participants do not always retain information provided during consent procedures. This may be relatively common in online research and is considered particularly problematic when the research carries risks. Clinical psychology studies using the trauma film paradigm, which aims to elicit an emotional response, provide an example. In the two studies presented here, 112-126 participants were informed they would be taking part in an online study using a variant of this paradigm. The information was provided across five digital pages using either a standard or an interactive format. In both studies, compared to the control condition, participants in the interactive condition showed more retention of information. However, this was only found for information about which they had been previously asked via the interactive format. Therefore, the impact of adding interactivity to digital study information was limited. True informed consent for an online study may require additional measures.

潜在的研究参与者并不总能保留在同意程序中提供的信息。这种情况在在线研究中可能比较常见,当研究具有风险时,这种情况尤其容易出现问题。临床心理学研究中使用的创伤影片范例就是一个例子,该范例旨在激发参与者的情绪反应。在本文介绍的两项研究中,112-126 名参与者被告知他们将参加一项使用该范式变体的在线研究。研究采用标准格式或互动格式,通过五个数字页面提供信息。在这两项研究中,与对照组相比,互动组的参与者对信息的保留率更高。不过,这只适用于之前通过互动形式询问过的信息。因此,在数字研究信息中增加互动性的影响是有限的。在线研究的真正知情同意可能需要额外的措施。
{"title":"How Making Consent Procedures More Interactive can Improve Informed Consent: An Experimental Study and Replication.","authors":"Marije Aan Het Rot, Ineke Wessel","doi":"10.1177/15562646241280208","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15562646241280208","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prospective research participants do not always retain information provided during consent procedures. This may be relatively common in online research and is considered particularly problematic when the research carries risks. Clinical psychology studies using the trauma film paradigm, which aims to elicit an emotional response, provide an example. In the two studies presented here, 112-126 participants were informed they would be taking part in an online study using a variant of this paradigm. The information was provided across five digital pages using either a standard or an interactive format. In both studies, compared to the control condition, participants in the interactive condition showed more retention of information. However, this was only found for information about which they had been previously asked via the interactive format. Therefore, the impact of adding interactivity to digital study information was limited. True informed consent for an online study may require additional measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"38-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048734/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142082433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Medical Students' Views on Their Experience of Applying to Research Ethics Committees: A Qualitative Study. 医学生对申请科研伦理委员会经验的看法:一项质性研究。
IF 1.7 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI: 10.1177/15562646241301824
Abdullah Yıldız, Ayşe Kurtoğlu, Berna Arda

The scope of medical training has expanded to encompass clinical skills and the ability to conduct and interpret scientific research. Therefore, medical students must develop an awareness of research and publication ethics to advance in their careers. This study aimed to understand medical students' perceptions of their first encounter with a research ethics committee. Qualitative methods were used to conduct three focus group interviews with students, and the data were thematically analysed. Findings revealed that the students had limited knowledge prior to their encounters, initially found the experience instructive yet challenging and negative, and later recognised its value. Students suggested enhancements to the practical and functional aspects of ethics committees and emphasised the need for ethics counselling in research.

医学培训的范围已扩大到包括临床技能以及进行和解释科学研究的能力。因此,医学生必须培养研究和出版伦理意识,才能在职业生涯中取得进步。本研究旨在了解医学生对他们第一次遇到研究伦理委员会的看法。采用定性方法对学生进行了三次焦点小组访谈,并对数据进行了主题分析。调查结果显示,学生们在接触之前的知识有限,最初觉得这种经历具有启发性,但具有挑战性和消极,后来认识到它的价值。学生建议加强伦理委员会的实践和功能,并强调在研究中需要伦理咨询。
{"title":"Medical Students' Views on Their Experience of Applying to Research Ethics Committees: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Abdullah Yıldız, Ayşe Kurtoğlu, Berna Arda","doi":"10.1177/15562646241301824","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15562646241301824","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The scope of medical training has expanded to encompass clinical skills and the ability to conduct and interpret scientific research. Therefore, medical students must develop an awareness of research and publication ethics to advance in their careers. This study aimed to understand medical students' perceptions of their first encounter with a research ethics committee. Qualitative methods were used to conduct three focus group interviews with students, and the data were thematically analysed. Findings revealed that the students had limited knowledge prior to their encounters, initially found the experience instructive yet challenging and negative, and later recognised its value. Students suggested enhancements to the practical and functional aspects of ethics committees and emphasised the need for ethics counselling in research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"18-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142781532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Putting an Ethics Training Program Online: It May Be More Complicated Than We Think. 把道德培训项目放到网上:它可能比我们想象的要复杂。
IF 1.7 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-19 DOI: 10.1177/15562646251313577
Cheryl K Stenmark

This project evaluated the online implementation of a Responsible Conduct of Research/Professional Ethics Training for graduate students. The program was offered as a video-streamed remote, real-time training with an in-person option. Effectiveness of the remote program was evaluated using multiple measures: perceptions of ethical dilemmas, ethical decision-making, and reactions to the training. Pre-post training comparisons indicated participants' scores were lower after training on some outcomes. Results comparing training modalities suggest post-training reductions in scores were largely driven by remote participants. In-person participants performed significantly better on several measures compared to remote participants. All participants had favorable reactions to the program. Results suggest that putting an ethics training online may require an innovative approach to program development, better planning and preparation by the training institution, and more research, to determine the most effective way to proceed.

本项目评估了研究生负责任的研究行为/职业道德培训的在线实施情况。该计划以视频流远程实时培训的形式提供,并提供面对面培训的选项。使用多种方法评估远程课程的有效性:对道德困境的感知、道德决策和对培训的反应。训练前后的比较表明,训练后参与者在某些结果上的得分较低。比较训练方式的结果表明,训练后分数的降低主要是由远程参与者驱动的。与远程参与者相比,现场参与者在几项指标上的表现明显更好。所有的参与者都对这个项目反应良好。结果表明,将道德培训放在网上可能需要一种创新的项目开发方法,培训机构更好的规划和准备,以及更多的研究,以确定最有效的方式进行。
{"title":"Putting an Ethics Training Program Online: It May Be More Complicated Than We Think.","authors":"Cheryl K Stenmark","doi":"10.1177/15562646251313577","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15562646251313577","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This project evaluated the online implementation of a Responsible Conduct of Research/Professional Ethics Training for graduate students. The program was offered as a video-streamed remote, real-time training with an in-person option. Effectiveness of the remote program was evaluated using multiple measures: perceptions of ethical dilemmas, ethical decision-making, and reactions to the training. Pre-post training comparisons indicated participants' scores were lower after training on some outcomes. Results comparing training modalities suggest post-training reductions in scores were largely driven by remote participants. In-person participants performed significantly better on several measures compared to remote participants. All participants had favorable reactions to the program. Results suggest that putting an ethics training online may require an innovative approach to program development, better planning and preparation by the training institution, and more research, to determine the most effective way to proceed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"6-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143015386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Searching for Evidence-Based Interventions When Infant Malnutrition Persists in the Setting of Support for Exclusive Breastfeeding. 在支持纯母乳喂养的情况下,寻找婴儿营养不良的循证干预措施。
IF 1.7 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI: 10.1177/15562646241301823
Valerie J Flaherman, Victoria Nankabirwa, Amy Sarah Ginsburg
{"title":"Searching for Evidence-Based Interventions When Infant Malnutrition Persists in the Setting of Support for Exclusive Breastfeeding.","authors":"Valerie J Flaherman, Victoria Nankabirwa, Amy Sarah Ginsburg","doi":"10.1177/15562646241301823","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15562646241301823","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"57-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143366708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Joint Editorial: Informed Consent and AI Transcription of Qualitative Data. 联合社论:定性数据的知情同意和人工智能转录。
IF 1.7 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI: 10.1177/15562646241296712
Gabrielle Samuel, Doug Wassenaar
{"title":"Joint Editorial: Informed Consent and AI Transcription of Qualitative Data.","authors":"Gabrielle Samuel, Doug Wassenaar","doi":"10.1177/15562646241296712","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15562646241296712","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"3-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048736/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142734390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Considerations for the Design of Informed Consent in Digital Health Research: Participant Perspectives. 数字健康研究中知情同意设计的考虑因素:参与者的观点。
IF 1.7 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-14 DOI: 10.1177/15562646241290078
Brian J McInnis, Ramona Pindus, Daniah Kareem, Camille Nebeker

The research team, prospective participants, and written materials all influence the success of the informed consent process. As digital health research becomes more prevalent, new challenges for successful informed consent are introduced. This exploratory research utilized a human centered design process in which 19 people were enrolled to participate in one of four online focus-groups. Participants discussed their experiences with informed consent, preferences for receiving study information and ideas about alternative consent approaches. Data were analyzed using qualitative methods. Six major themes and sixteen sub-themes were identified that included study information that prospective participants would like to receive, preferences for accessing information and a desire to connect with research team members. Specific to digital health, participants expressed a need to understand how the technologies worked and how the volume of granular personal information would be collected, stored, and shared.

研究团队、潜在参与者和书面材料都会影响知情同意程序的成功与否。随着数字健康研究的日益普及,成功获得知情同意也面临着新的挑战。这项探索性研究采用了以人为本的设计流程,招募了 19 人参加四个在线焦点小组中的一个。参与者讨论了他们在知情同意方面的经验、接收研究信息的偏好以及对其他同意方式的看法。我们采用定性方法对数据进行了分析。确定了六大主题和十六个次主题,其中包括潜在参与者希望获得的研究信息、获取信息的偏好以及与研究团队成员联系的愿望。具体到数字健康,参与者表示需要了解这些技术是如何工作的,以及如何收集、存储和共享大量的细粒度个人信息。
{"title":"Considerations for the Design of Informed Consent in Digital Health Research: Participant Perspectives.","authors":"Brian J McInnis, Ramona Pindus, Daniah Kareem, Camille Nebeker","doi":"10.1177/15562646241290078","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15562646241290078","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The research team, prospective participants, and written materials all influence the success of the informed consent process. As digital health research becomes more prevalent, new challenges for successful informed consent are introduced. This exploratory research utilized a human centered design process in which 19 people were enrolled to participate in one of four online focus-groups. Participants discussed their experiences with informed consent, preferences for receiving study information and ideas about alternative consent approaches. Data were analyzed using qualitative methods. Six major themes and sixteen sub-themes were identified that included study information that prospective participants would like to receive, preferences for accessing information and a desire to connect with research team members. Specific to digital health, participants expressed a need to understand how the technologies worked and how the volume of granular personal information would be collected, stored, and shared.</p>","PeriodicalId":50211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"175-185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588507/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142479534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1