American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics最新文献

{"title":"Patient-provider communication during consultations for elective dental procedures: A scoping review","authors":"Codey Pilgrim,&nbsp;Raisa Catunda,&nbsp;Paul Major,&nbsp;Arnaldo Perez-Garcia,&nbsp;Carlos Flores-Mir","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.07.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.07.014","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Patient-provider communication (PPC) is a critical component of patient-centered care. Original studies have examined specific factors related to PPC during consultations for elective dental procedures, but this evidence has yet to be comprehensively summarized. This scoping review aimed to understand better the extent and depth of the available literature regarding factors that influence PPC during consultations for elective dental procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The authors considered electronically available, English-language, original research published since 1990 assessing communication during consultations for elective dental procedures. Four electronic databases, Google Scholar, and reference lists of inclusions were searched until August 2023. No quality assessment was completed. Two independent researchers assessed article eligibility. Data were charted with a narrative review approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 37 studies were included. The most popular discipline studied was orthodontics. Prospective cohorts and cross-sectional were the most common study designs. Information recall, patient satisfaction, and patient comprehension were the most common outcome measures. Most studies employed questionnaires, surveys, or interviews for data collection. Nineteen factors related to PPC during elective dental consultations were identified and categorized into information delivery (4), patient-related (9), and provider-related factors (6).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This scoping review is the first to present a list of evidence-supported factors related to PPC in elective dental consultations. Identifying these factors is an important first step to better understanding their influence on PPC and designing interventions targeting those that may be modifiable. PPC during elective dental consultations is a dynamic, ongoing process. Several recommendations emerged that may help improve PPC, including appropriate information delivery, patient engagement, providing adequate time, and educating ourselves on approaches to PPC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":"166 5","pages":"Pages 413-422.e6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142037643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Short- and long-term effects of conventional and miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion on hard tissues using voxel-based superimposition of serial cone-beam computed tomography scans","authors":"Isaac Empson ,&nbsp;Marinho Del Santo Jr. ,&nbsp;Chia-Ling Kuo ,&nbsp;Manuel Lagravere Vich ,&nbsp;Dawei Liu ,&nbsp;Sumit Yadav ,&nbsp;Shivam Mehta","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.06.017","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.06.017","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The objective of this study was to evaluate the short-term and long-term hard-tissue changes with miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) and rapid palatal expansion (RPE) compared with a matched control group with voxel-based superimposition using 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>A total of 180 CBCT scans were analyzed for 60 patients with a mean age of 13.9 years at 3 time points: pretreatment (T1), postexpansion (T2), and posttreatment (T3). Patients were divided into 3 groups: MARPE, RPE, and controls. Voxel-based superimposition was performed for CBCTs from T1 to T2 and T1 to T3 using the anterior cranial base as a reference. The hard-tissue surfaces were extracted after the superimposition procedure. Nine landmarks were analyzed: nasion, A-point, pogonion, left and right alar bases, zygoma, and gonion. Within-group changes were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, including a random intercept per subject and the mixed effect of time (T1, T2, or T3) with test </span><em>P</em> values adjusted for multiple testing using Tukey’s method. Between-group changes were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, including a random intercept per subject and the mixed effects of time, group, and group × time interaction with <em>P</em> values adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamin-Hochberg false discovery rate method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the short term, both MARPE and RPE led to a significant downward movement of the right gonion and lateral movement of the right alar base compared with controls at T2 (<em>P</em> &lt;0.05). In addition, MARPE led to a significant downward movement of pogonion and left gonion. RPE led to a significant downward movement of the A-point and lateral movement of the left alar base compared with controls at T2 (<em>P</em> &lt;0.05). However, in the long-term, no changes were observed between the groups at T3.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There were significant differences in pogonion, alar base, and gonion between MARPE, RPE, and control groups in the short term. However, all the hard-tissue changes were transient, as there were no differences between the 3 groups in the long term.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":"166 5","pages":"Pages 445-457.e2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141753284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Status","authors":"Laurance Jerrold","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.08.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":"166 5","pages":"Pages 503-507"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142569198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Directory: AAO Officers and Organizations","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S0889-5406(24)00415-3","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S0889-5406(24)00415-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":"166 5","pages":"Page 511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142571968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"November 2024 Continuing Education","authors":"Dr Allen H. Moffitt (CE Editor)","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.09.004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":"166 5","pages":"Pages 508.e1-508.e2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142571967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Accountability counts","authors":"Peter M. Greco","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.08.001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":"166 5","pages":"Page 412"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142568887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Analysis of predicted and achieved root angulation changes in teeth adjacent to maxillary premolar extraction sites in patients treated with the Invisalign appliance","authors":"Abirami Thilagalavanian,&nbsp;Tony Weir,&nbsp;Maurice J. Meade","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.06.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.06.014","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study aimed to investigate the expression of root angulation in canine, premolar, and first molar teeth adjacent to first and second premolar extraction sites in the maxilla after treatment with an initial series of Invisalign aligners (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with at least 1 first and/or second premolar extraction in the maxilla and satisfying strict selection criteria were evaluated. Digital models representing pretreatment, predicted, and posttreatment were obtained from Align Technology’s digital interface, ClinCheck. The Geomagic Control X (version 2017.0.3; 3D systems, Rock Hill, NC) software facility was used to determine and compare the root angulation of adjacent canine, premolar, and first molar teeth at different time points.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The predicted angulation of teeth was significantly different (<em>P</em> &lt;0.02) than that achieved in most patients. When adjacent teeth roots were planned to tip away from the extraction site, there was an overexpression of the movement. When teeth roots were planned to tip into the extraction site, underexpression occurred, and movement was in the opposite direction in some instances. There was no difference in root angulation outcomes according to the prescribed number of aligners, 1- or 2-week wear protocols, and sex (<em>P</em> &gt;0.05). Attachments were influential in controlling angulation in first-premolar extractions (<em>P</em> = 0.05), but optimized attachments were not any more effective than conventional attachments (<em>P</em> &gt;0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The achieved root angulation in teeth adjacent to premolar extraction sites in the maxilla after treatment with an initial series of Invisalign aligners differed significantly from that predicted. Attachments play a minor role in the predictability of root angulation outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":"166 5","pages":"Pages 423-432"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141789672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Long-term survival of 57 premolars consecutively transplanted to premolar sites","authors":"Teitur Jonsson ,&nbsp;Hafdis B. Jonsdottir ,&nbsp;Thor Aspelund ,&nbsp;Asgeir Sigurdsson ,&nbsp;Thorarinn J. Sigurdsson","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.07.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The objective of this study was to report the long-term outcome of autotransplantation of premolars to other premolar recipient sites.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The sample was limited to adolescents seeking orthodontic treatment, and all had 1 or 2 premolars transplanted to a recipient site in which a premolar was congenitally missing. The transplantations were performed between 1980 and 2008, comprising 29 premolars in 22 males and 28 premolars in 22 females. Systematic clinical and radiographic follow-up varied from 1 year to 36.8 years, with a mean observation time of 18.9 years and a median of 19.2 years. Of the 57 transplanted teeth, 52 were subjected to orthodontic forces.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 9 of 57 teeth (15.8%) were lost during the observation period, and 8 of 9 lost teeth had been functional for at least 9 years posttransplantation. Of the 48 surviving transplants, 6 did not meet the criteria for success, giving an overall success rate of 73.7%. Complications were diagnosed within 5 years from the transplantation in 4 of 57 teeth (7.0%) and later in 11 of 57 (19.3%). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve shows that the complication-free proportion of transplants decreased at a constant rate over the observation time. The average survival time, taking censoring into account during follow-up of 36.8 years, was estimated as 28.5 years. The complications in the 15 teeth were classified into 4 categories: periapical lesions (6 teeth), inflammatory resorption (5 teeth), abrupt fracture (2 teeth), and ankylosis (2 teeth).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Overall, premolar transplants in all stages of root formation have high success and survival rates. Transplants with complications may survive temporarily and preserve critical arch space and alveolar bone. Transplants with normal healing may have latent weaknesses that can eventually affect long-term survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":"166 5","pages":"Pages 480-489.e3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141876640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Mesiodistal tip expression of mandibular anterior teeth in patients with mandibular incisor extraction treated with Invisalign aligners","authors":"Laura Truong ,&nbsp;Tony Weir ,&nbsp;Hien Nguyen ,&nbsp;Elissa Freer ,&nbsp;Desmond Ong","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.07.016","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.07.016","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Extraction of a single mandibular incisor may be prescribed in conjunction with clear aligner orthodontic treatment. The accuracy of therapeutic mesiodistal tooth positioning for the remaining mandibular anterior teeth for such patients has not been comprehensively evaluated. This retrospective study compared the predicted and achieved mesiodistal tooth movements in the mandibular anterior region for patients treated with Invisalign (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif), along with the influence of aligner attachments and the frequency of aligner change.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A sample of 83 subjects who had undergone Invisalign treatment with a single mandibular incisor extraction was collected from an existing database. The pretreatment tooth positions, the predicted mesiodistal tooth movement, and the achieved outcomes were measured for the remaining mandibular anterior teeth using Geomagic Control X metrology software (3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC). The predicted and achieved mesiodistal tip movements were analyzed and compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Regression analysis revealed significant differences (<em>P</em> &lt;0.001) between the predicted and achieved mesiodistal tooth positioning for incisors and canines. For every degree of predicted incisor mesiodistal tip, 78.89% of this tip was achieved (<em>R</em>² = 0.4901). For every degree of predicted canine tip, 54.16% was clinically expressed (<em>R</em>² = 0.5965). The accuracy of mesiodistal tip expression was not significantly affected by the prescribed number of aligners, 1-week vs 2-week aligner change protocols, or the presence of attachments (<em>P</em> &gt;0.05). In addition, incisors were less likely to express the correct direction of the mesiodistal tip predicted than canines (<em>P</em> = 0.020).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A shortfall between the predicted and clinically achieved expression of mesiodistal tooth movement with Invisalign was found for the anterior teeth after a mandibular incisor extraction. The number of aligners, duration of aligner wear, and specific attachment designs were not found to significantly influence the accuracy of the achieved mesiodistal tip movements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":"166 6","pages":"Pages 538-548"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142479951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Potential for bracket bonding errors based on tray accuracy and fit: Evaluation of 6 photopolymer resins for indirect bonding trays","authors":"Eugine Yim ,&nbsp;Jing Liu ,&nbsp;Sung-Hwan Choi ,&nbsp;Chooryung J. Chung ,&nbsp;Kee-Joon Lee ,&nbsp;Sang-Bae Lee ,&nbsp;Ki Beom Kim ,&nbsp;Jung-Yul Cha","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.08.005","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.08.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>We assessed the accuracy and fit of 3-dimensional (3D)-printed indirect bonding (IDB) trays fabricated using various photopolymer resin materials.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A maxillary plaster model and 60 plaster replicas were created. IDB trays with arbitrary bracket configurations were 3D-printed using 3 hard resins (Amber [AB], TC85DAC [TC], Orthoflex [OF]) and 3 soft resins (IBT [IT], IDB2 [ID], and MED625FLX [MD]). A reference plaster model with a computer-aided design-designed IDB tray attached with nonfunctional, arbitrary bracket configurations on the buccal surface serving as reference points for measurement was superimposed on scanned plaster replicas holding 3D-printed trays to assess transfer accuracy and clinically acceptable error. Printing accuracy was assessed by comparing computer-aided design trays to printed trays, and tray fit was measured by the gap volume between the tray and plaster replica using a Fit-Checker (GC Corp, Tokyo, Japan).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six tray groups showed significant linear transfer errors, particularly in the vertical direction (0.15 mm [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.10-1.15]; <em>P</em> = 0.004). The OF group exhibited the largest vertical error (0.27 mm [95% CI, 0.19-0.35]), whereas the ID group had the smallest (0.10 mm [95% CI, 0.06-0.14]). Angular errors did not exhibit significant differences across the groups. Linear precision error was the highest in OF, followed by ID, TC, and MD, then AB and IT (<em>P</em> &lt;0.001). Of all tray groups, 90.1% and 68.8% met the clinically acceptable linear (&lt;0.25 mm) and angular errors (1°).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Linear errors, particularly vertical errors, are more material-dependent than angular errors. Gap volume alone was not a reliable predictor of IDB tray accuracy. Therefore, material-specific designs are needed to control the optimal fit and facilitate precise bracket placement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":"166 6","pages":"Pages 595-607"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142479952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}