Introduction: The primary objective of this study was to assess the 3-dimensional position of the mandibular canal (MC) in different craniofacial patterns to know about the safe placement of temporary skeletal anchorage devices using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The secondary objectives were to assess sex differences and correlate the MC position with various factors.
Methods: This prospective, observational study was conducted on 90 patients, divided into 3 groups based on the sagittal pattern: skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III. Similarly, based on the growth pattern of the patients, the sample was divided into 3 groups: horizontal, average, and vertical growth pattern. The skeletal and growth patterns were assessed using lateral cephalograms, and the position of the MC was assessed using CBCT. The position of the MC was assessed in 3 regions: the distal surface of the second molar (region 1), the interdental area between the first and second molars (region 2), and the interdental area between the first molar and second premolar (region 3). Data were subjected to statistical analysis.
Results: The statistically significant differences were noticed in the buccolingual position of MC in regions 2 and 3 in different skeletal patterns, whereas no statistically significant differences were noticed for the superoinferior position. In region 1, the MC was positioned closest to the alveolar crest among vertical growers. No statistically significant sex differences were observed between groups. A statistically significant positive correlation was observed between the buccolingual position of the MC and the skeletal pattern.
Conclusions: It is essential to know the 3-dimensional position of the MC in different craniofacial patterns using CBCT for safe placement of temporary skeletal anchorage devices.
Introduction: A novel method was established for the staging of midpalatal suture (MPS) ossification based on a pseudocoloring stack of anterior and posterior MPS coronal slices obtained by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Methods: CBCT scans of 240 subjects aged 5-35 years were pseudocolor processed. The slice thickness of stacked anterior and posterior coronal observation planes was set at 5.0 mm. The ossification status of both anterior or posterior MPS was classified as the tunnel, partially ossified, or ossified type. MPSs were classified into 5 stages: stage I, anterior and posterior MPSs are the tunnel type; stage II, anterior and posterior MPSs are the tunnel and partially ossified type, respectively; stage III, anterior and posterior MPSs are the partially ossified type; stage IV, anterior and posterior MPSs are the tunnel or partially ossified type and ossified type, respectively; and stage V, anterior and posterior MPSs are the ossified type. The weighted κ value was used to assess the intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement of the MPS classifications.
Results: Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of the proposed staging method was substantial. The largest proportions of patients aged 5-15 years and 16-35 years were classified as stages I and III, respectively. Among adults, 31.0% of males and 7.1% of females were classified as stage I or II.
Conclusions: The pseudocolor imaging technique and the stack of CBCT slices provide relatively intuitive and comprehensive information on MPS ossification. The novel classification of MPS ossification is expected to serve as an indication of the necessity of surgical intervention for maxillary expansion treatment.
Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate maxillary dental midline shifts and mandibular asymmetries created in different amounts and directions on photographs taken from 7 different angles by different groups and to determine acceptable esthetic limits.
Methods: Photographs of a female model in a social smile position were taken from 7 different angles (0° [frontal], 15°, 30°, and 45° on the right and left sides) and digitally modified for maxillary dental and mandibular midline deviations at specified degrees using Adobe Photoshop. To enable participants to evaluate the photographs sequentially, the photographs were transformed into videos using Adobe Premiere Pro software. The videos were rated by 188 participants (48 orthodontists; 49 dentists; 45 esthetic, plastic, and reconstructive surgeons; and 46 laypersons) using the visual analog scale (VAS) in a survey. An analysis of variance test was used to compare VAS scores among raters, and the Bonferroni test was used to compare VAS scores among the groups.
Results: The threshold for the acceptability of maxillary dental midline shifts was 2 mm for orthodontists; dentists; and esthetic, plastic, and reconstructive surgeons but 4 mm for laypersons. Although laypersons were unable to perceive changes in mandibular asymmetry between 0°-6°, the threshold was 3° for other groups. For participants in which mandibular asymmetries and maxillary dental midline shifts were in opposite directions, the threshold for all groups was 6°. For participants in which lower jaw asymmetries and maxillary dental midline shifts were in the same direction, the threshold value for orthodontists was 6°. Other groups could not perceive variables related to asymmetry.
Conclusions: More sensitive esthetic assessments can be made by evaluating smile esthetics from different angles. Mandibular asymmetries are considered more esthetically acceptable than maxillary dental midline shifts. In mandibular asymmetry and maxillary dental midline shifts, deviations in the same direction are more esthetically acceptable than deviations in opposite directions. Orthodontists are able to notice small changes in mandibular asymmetry.
Introduction: This study evaluated the dentoskeletal effects of miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction, which included a mandibular anchorage bar and a night facemask in adolescents.
Methods: A total of 20 growing patients with Class III malocclusion and maxillary deficiency were treated with a hybrid hyrax expander with 2 miniscrews in the maxilla and a mandibular anchor bar supported in 2 miniscrews in the anterior region of the mandible. Class III elastics were used from the maxillary first molars to the mandibular anchorage bar, joining the mandibular miniscrews installed between permanent incisors and canines. The variables that met the presuppositions of a parametric analysis were analyzed using the paired t test, and the remaining variables were analyzed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon paired test.
Results: The final sample included 17 subjects (4 females and 13 males; initial age, 12.3 ± 1.2 years). The results demonstrated a significant increase in Wits appraisal (mm), ANB (°), SNA (°), N perp-A (mm), Co-A (mm), Co-Gn (mm), AFAI (mm), molar relationship (mm), overjet (mm), U6-vertical Pt (mm), L1-NB (mm) and U1-L1 (°) (P <0.05).
Conclusions: The study showed that miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction associated with facemasks and mandibular anchorage bars produces positive skeletal effects in adolescents while also favoring the control of dental effects.