Academic Pediatrics最新文献

Objective: Coordination to get everyone in the room at the same time for family-centered rounds (FCR) is challenging. The objective of this study was to determine if using a virtual queue that notifies nurses and families in real time when to expect the rounding team could impact their presence on rounds.

Methods: We observed rounds on two neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) teams for 6 weeks before and after implementation of a novel rounding software, Q-rounds, that shares real-time updates on when the team will arrive and allows families to répondez s'il vous plaît (RSVP) to join remotely when they cannot be there in person. Observers collected metrics pertinent to FCR including nurse and family presence (in-person or remotely) and duration of rounds and used Chi-square and two group t-tests for analysis.

Results: Rounds were observed for 165 patient encounters pre-implementation and 179 patient encounters post-implementation, with an average rounding duration of 10.3 minutes (SD 6.5) and 10.4 minutes (SD 6.3) per patient respectively (P = 0.91). The proportion of nurses who were present for the entirety of the rounding discussion increased from 18.8% to 58.2% (P < 0.001). Family presence on rounds increased from 20.0% (95% CI, 13.9-26.1) to 43.0% (95% CI, 35.8-50.3; P < 0.001). The percentage of families that participated in rounds remotely increased from 15.2% to 55.8% (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: This observational study showed that the use of a novel rounding software was associated with a significant increase in family presence for rounds and nurse presence for the entirety of rounds without increasing rounding duration.

Objective: We assessed adolescent relationship abuse (ARA) prevalence and ARA intervention acceptability and perceived benefit among hospitalized adolescents and young adults (AYA).

Methods: This was a planned secondary analysis of a cross-sectional survey exploring sexual and reproductive health among a convenience sample of AYA (14-25 years) hospitalized in medical/surgical units at two Midwest children's hospitals. Survey items assessed history of dating, lifetime prevalence of four types of ARA (physical abuse, sexual abuse, reproductive coercion, sexual exploitation), and demographics.

Results: Among 324 participants, 72.5% reported dating and, among those with history of dating, 17% reported one or more types of ARA. ARA was more common among those who reported foregone health care in the preceding 12 months. There was no difference in likelihood of dating and ARA between those with and without a chronic health condition. Approximately half felt it is helpful for clinicians to discuss dating relationships with adolescents (58.6%) and acceptable to do this during a hospitalization (50.6%). Conversations with clinicians about dating relationships were more likely to be reported helpful by those who had dated (63.9% reporting dating vs 50.6% not reporting dating, P 0.04) and those who reported prior ARA (79.5% reporting ARA vs 60.4% not reporting ARA, P 0.02).

Conclusions: Hospitalization may represent a unique opportunity to support healthy AYA dating relationships. Further work is needed to further explore acceptability and feasibility of such interventions.

Objectives: Our objectives were to examine the following: physician survey response rates across a 20-year period; the impact of a token incentive on response rates; whether survey nonresponse bias is present and if it is associated with response rate; and the impact of a token incentive on nonresponse bias.

Methods: We utilized data from 68 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) pediatrician surveys from 2000 to 2019 and an AAP administrative database, which included information for both respondents and non-respondents (target sample). Linear regression examined response rates over time. To assess nonresponse bias, a t-test or Wilcoxon rank test compared respondents and the target sample by age, gender, and US Census region. Linear regression or Spearman correlation examined the association of response rate and nonresponse bias. Interrupted time series analyses tested the introduction of a $2 token incentive on both response rates and nonresponse bias.

Results: Overall mean survey response rate was 56.2%. Response rates declined across survey years (β = -0.58, P < 0.001). The $2 incentive generated an 8.7% response rate increase (P < 0.001). The respondent groups had more female pediatricians than the target samples (62.5% vs 60.1%, P < 0.001). Age nonresponse bias was associated with lower response rates (β = -0.47, P < 0.001). The $2 incentive was associated with nonresponse bias shifts toward older, away from female, and away from Northeastern respondents.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates an overall decline in pediatrician survey response rates and a meaningful impact of a token incentive on response rates and nonresponse bias, underscoring the importance of measuring nonresponse bias whenever possible.

Objective: To explore how Sesame Workshop resources are perceived by Latino families with economic hardship and to highlight approaches for early heart healthy routine promotion.

Methods: We performed a purposive sampling of Latina mothers (n = 40) with young children experiencing economic hardship. Using an interview guide informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we recorded Spanish and English semistructured interviews, which were translated and transcribed verbatim. Partnering with Sesame Workshop, we iteratively incorporated Sesame Resources into interviews to query for acceptability. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we coded transcripts through textual analysis until saturation, prioritizing in vivo coding to capture participant voices.

Results: We constructed 3 themes. Parents connected with resources that 1) Reflect lived and multicultural experiences containing recognizable family scenes that can serve as tools to transfer a parent's own early routines or cultural rituals to their child. They appreciated resources that 2) Engage caregivers and children together, featuring elements for both children and adult caregivers with activities to highlight important caregivers and encourage shared play. Participants also reflected on how 3) Routines amplify family strengths and foster resilient reactions with feelings of decreased stress when daily practices become routines, promoting resilient reactions and supporting long-term goals when facing setbacks.

Conclusions: An interdisciplinary partnership leveraged strengths of pediatric practitioners and Sesame Workshop to align future initiatives with the values and priorities of mothers of young children at risk for early obesity. Resultant themes inform strategies to promote heart healthy routines and relational health in young children with economic hardship.

Objective: Pediatric coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination rates remain low in rural areas. A strong clinician recommendation improves vaccine uptake, but the pediatric COVID-19 vaccine recommendation practices of rural primary care clinicians have not been reported. Our objectives were to describe, among rural Colorado pediatric clinicians: 1) recommendation practices for COVID-19 vaccine compared to influenza and school-entry required vaccines, and 2) personal attitudes.

Methods: From July to October 2023, surveys were distributed to clinicians in rural Colorado identified as pediatric vaccine providers in counties designated as rural through the Colorado Immunization Information System using mail and email.

Results: Of 89 survey respondents, 37% of clinicians strongly recommended COVID-19 vaccines for children 6 months-5 years old, compared to 79% for influenza (P = 0.05) and 92% for school-entry required vaccines (P = 0.04). For children 6-11 and 12-17 years old, 43% and 44% of clinicians strongly recommended COVID-19 vaccines, respectively, compared to 71% and 70% for influenza (P < 0.01), and 91% for school-entry required vaccines (P < 0.01). Forty four percent of clinicians agreed that COVID-19 vaccines are important for pediatric patients. The most common clinician-perceived challenges to discussing pediatric COVID-19 vaccines included a lack of parent interest in more information (76% "somewhat" or "strongly" agree), lack of ability to change parents' minds (71%), and concerns that the vaccines are too political (40%).

Conclusions: Most rural Colorado clinicians do not strongly recommend pediatric COVID-19 vaccines compared to influenza and school-entry required vaccines. Efforts to improve pediatric COVID-19 vaccine uptake should aim to strengthen clinicians' recommendations of these vaccines.

Objective: Our objectives were to evaluate for any cluster patterns of youth suicide deaths and characterize the level of child opportunity in the communities where suicide deaths occurred.

Methods: Decedents <18 years were identified from San Diego County Medical Examiner death reports from 2000 to 2020. We mapped decedents' residential Zone Improvement Plan (ZIP) codes and calculated suicide rates per 10,000 youths. ZIP codes identified in overlapping spatial statistical approaches - the spatial scan statistic and Local Moran with Empirical Bayes (EB) rates - were considered a cluster for the final analysis. We obtained Child Opportunity Index (COI) scores for each ZIP code to determine if there were differences in: 1) ZIP codes with suicide deaths compared to ZIPs with no deaths 2) differences in distribution of suicide death rates across quintiles of COI.

Results: Scan statistic identified 25 ZIP codes within a cluster (RR 2.6, P = 0.00066). Local Moran with EB rates identified two ZIP codes as a high-high cluster (P < 0.05). The location identified as a cluster in both approaches was in Alpine. The median COI for ZIP codes with suicide deaths was higher at 63.5 (IQR 38-83) compared to 47 (IQR 22.5-75.5) for ZIP codes without suicide deaths. There was a significant difference in suicide rates between Very Low and Moderate levels of Overall opportunity (P = .013).

Conclusion: We identified a cluster of youth suicides in one of the most populous counties in the country. These findings serve to inform policies and prevention programs that aim to mitigate youth suicide mortality.

Objective: Suicide risk identified via universal screening in health care settings is associated with subsequent suicidal behavior and is an important prevention strategy. The prevalence of positive suicide risk screening among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth in the emergency department (ED) has not been described. The current study examined the association between gender identity and suicide risk screening results, adjusted for other demographic and clinical characteristics.

Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study of electronic medical record data from ED visits November 2019-August 2022 in an urban academic children's hospital. Participants were youth ages 8-25 who received the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions suicide risk screening tool.

Results: Of 12,112 ED visits with suicide risk screening performed (42% male, median age 14 [12,16]), 24% had positive screens. Of 565 visits by TGD youth, 78.1% had positive screens, and 9.5% had active suicidal ideation. Compared to visits by cisgender females, the adjusted odds of positive screens were 5.35 times higher (95% CI 3.99, 7.18) among visits by TGD youth and 0.45 times lower (95% CI 0.40, 0.52) among visits by cisgender males. Compared to visits by cisgender females, the adjusted odds of active suicidal ideation were higher for cisgender males (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.07, 1.68) but did not significantly differ for TGD youth.

Conclusions: TGD youth have high rates of positive suicide risk screening in the ED, demonstrating substantial mental health needs. Opportunities may be available to improve detection, evidence-based brief interventions, and linkage to mental health services for this population.