首页 > 最新文献

Dialysis & Transplantation最新文献

英文 中文
Retracted Fenoldopam in critically ill patients with early renal dysfunction: A crossover study 非诺多巴在危重患者早期肾功能不全中的应用:一项交叉研究
Pub Date : 2011-03-08 DOI: 10.1002/dat.20538
Gian Paparcuri MD, Miguel Cobas MD, Maria De La Pena MD, Erik Barquist MD, Albert Varon MD

Retraction: The following article from Dialysis & Transplantation, 'Fenoldopam in critically ill patients with early renal dysfunction: A crossover study' by Gian Paparcuri, Miguel Cobas, Maria De La Pena, Erik Barquist and Albert Varon, published online on March 8, 2011 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), and in Volume 40, pp. 164-167, has been retracted through agreement between the first author, the Editors, Andrew Z. Fenves and Larry B. Melton, and Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The retraction has been agreed due to duplicate publication in another journal.

撤回:以下文章来自《透析》杂志移植:由Gian Paparcuri、Miguel Cobas、Maria De La Pena、Erik Barquist和Albert Varon撰写的“非诺多巴胺在早期肾功能不全危重患者中的应用:交叉研究”,于2011年3月8日在Wiley在线图书馆(wileyonlinelibrary.com)上发表,第40卷164-167页,经第一作者、编辑Andrew Z. Fenves和Larry B. Melton以及Wiley期刊公司同意,已被撤销。由于在另一个期刊上重复发表,撤回已被同意。
{"title":"Retracted Fenoldopam in critically ill patients with early renal dysfunction: A crossover study","authors":"Gian Paparcuri MD,&nbsp;Miguel Cobas MD,&nbsp;Maria De La Pena MD,&nbsp;Erik Barquist MD,&nbsp;Albert Varon MD","doi":"10.1002/dat.20538","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dat.20538","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Retraction: The following article from <i>Dialysis &amp; Transplantation</i>, 'Fenoldopam in critically ill patients with early renal dysfunction: A crossover study' by Gian Paparcuri, Miguel Cobas, Maria De La Pena, Erik Barquist and Albert Varon, published online on March 8, 2011 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), and in Volume 40, pp. 164-167, has been retracted through agreement between the first author, the Editors, Andrew Z. Fenves and Larry B. Melton, and Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The retraction has been agreed due to duplicate publication in another journal.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51012,"journal":{"name":"Dialysis & Transplantation","volume":"40 4","pages":"164-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dat.20538","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"51498353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
My most memorable patient 我最难忘的病人
Pub Date : 2011-03-08 DOI: 10.1002/dat.20549
John Larsen CHT

I have worked as a certified hemodialysis technologist/technician (CHT) for about 12 years, and have been in the medical field for almost 20. I've worked with many extraordinary patients over the years, but I have one particular patient who was very special to me—my dad.

Dad went into the hospital to have an aneurysm on his aorta removed. It had been there for years, and we all knew it. It was a triple “A” surgery (abdominal aortic aneurysm) that ended up with a fourth aneurysm found in his groin area that exploded throughout his left leg. To make a long story short, Dad lost circulation in his left leg which then had to be removed below the knee. Then what I thought was my worst nightmare occurred—his kidneys shut down. We had to make another traumatic decision, to start dialysis right away.

I helped set up the machine, and while stringing it I took measures and precautions beyond those I typically do with patients to ensure sterilization because, after all, this was my dad. The catheter placement wasn't the best, but I helped get the dialysis going and, as I sat there watching him, I knew Dad wouldn't want to live like that. But, I took every measure I could to make him comfortable, telling myself it was just an acute setting and that he would bounce back.

During this time that my father was ill, the company I work for had offered me a biomedical position—a job that would take me away from direct patient care—which I was considering. My dad and I were always close, and he was always my hero. He always listened to me and helped me make decisions about different things in my life, and I always went to him for advice. Sitting there with my dad in the hospital, I started to think about all of the patients in my dialysis facility—how they feel, all they go through as dialysis patients, and all of the tough decisions they have to make.

As I had in the past, I took this time talked to my dad about the opportunity, even though I wasn't sure he couldn't hear me as he lay there in the hospital bed. I told him about the offer and, even though he could not talk because of his ventilator, he raised his arm, put his hand on mine, and shook his head “no.” I said, “Dad, do you want me to stay with the patients?” And he nodded his head “yes.”.

This was a very moving moment for me, and I immediately decided to decline my company's offer and stay with patient care. When you set up patients every day, it's easy to become mechanical and just go through the motions. But I now look at every patient as if he or she is my dad, and am careful to string a machine and hook up every patient with the same care and precision as if my dad was in that chair.

My father passed away three years ago. I loved him very much, and I miss him terribly, but he helped me make a decision I've never been sorry for. Thank you, Dad. You were my favorite patient. Love, your son, John.

我作为一名认证的血液透析技术人员/技术员(CHT)工作了大约12年,在医疗领域工作了近20年。多年来,我治疗过许多不同寻常的病人,但有一个病人对我来说非常特别——我的父亲。爸爸去医院切除了主动脉上的动脉瘤。它已经存在很多年了,我们都知道。这是一个三“a”手术(腹主动脉瘤),最终在他的腹股沟区域发现了第四个动脉瘤,并在他的左腿上爆炸。长话短说,爸爸的左腿失去了血液循环,不得不在膝盖以下进行手术。然后,我认为最可怕的噩梦发生了——他的肾脏停止了运转。我们不得不做另一个痛苦的决定,马上开始透析。我帮忙安装了机器,在安装机器的时候,我采取了一些措施和预防措施,这些措施和预防措施超出了我通常对病人所做的,以确保消毒,因为,毕竟,这是我父亲。导管的放置不是最好的,但我帮助透析进行,当我坐在那里看着他时,我知道爸爸不会想那样生活的。但是,我尽我所能让他舒服,告诉自己这只是一个急症,他会恢复过来的。在我父亲生病的那段时间里,我工作的公司给了我一个生物医学的职位——一个让我不再直接照顾病人的工作——我正在考虑这个职位。我爸爸和我一直很亲密,他一直是我心目中的英雄。他总是倾听我的意见,帮我做生活中不同事情的决定,我也总是向他寻求建议。和爸爸一起坐在医院里,我开始想到所有在我的透析设施里的病人——他们的感受,他们作为透析病人所经历的一切,以及他们必须做出的所有艰难决定。和过去一样,这次我跟爸爸谈了这个机会,尽管我不确定他躺在医院的病床上听不见我说的话。我告诉了他我的提议,尽管他戴着呼吸机不能说话,但他举起手臂,把手放在我的手上,摇了摇头,“不”。我说:“爸爸,你想让我陪着病人吗?”他点了点头,“是的。”这对我来说是一个非常感人的时刻,我立即决定拒绝公司的邀请,继续做病人护理工作。当你每天安排病人时,很容易变得机械,只是走过场。但现在我看着每一个病人,就好像他或她是我的父亲,我小心翼翼地把一台机器连接起来,把每一个病人都连接起来,就像我的父亲坐在那把椅子上一样小心和精确。我父亲三年前去世了。我非常爱他,也非常想念他,但他帮我做了一个我从未后悔过的决定。谢谢你,爸爸。你是我最喜欢的病人。爱你的儿子,约翰。
{"title":"My most memorable patient","authors":"John Larsen CHT","doi":"10.1002/dat.20549","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dat.20549","url":null,"abstract":"<p>I have worked as a certified hemodialysis technologist/technician (CHT) for about 12 years, and have been in the medical field for almost 20. I've worked with many extraordinary patients over the years, but I have one particular patient who was very special to me—my dad.</p><p>Dad went into the hospital to have an aneurysm on his aorta removed. It had been there for years, and we all knew it. It was a triple “A” surgery (abdominal aortic aneurysm) that ended up with a fourth aneurysm found in his groin area that exploded throughout his left leg. To make a long story short, Dad lost circulation in his left leg which then had to be removed below the knee. Then what I thought was my worst nightmare occurred—his kidneys shut down. We had to make another traumatic decision, to start dialysis right away.</p><p>I helped set up the machine, and while stringing it I took measures and precautions beyond those I typically do with patients to ensure sterilization because, after all, this was my dad. The catheter placement wasn't the best, but I helped get the dialysis going and, as I sat there watching him, I knew Dad wouldn't want to live like that. But, I took every measure I could to make him comfortable, telling myself it was just an acute setting and that he would bounce back.</p><p>During this time that my father was ill, the company I work for had offered me a biomedical position—a job that would take me away from direct patient care—which I was considering. My dad and I were always close, and he was always my hero. He always listened to me and helped me make decisions about different things in my life, and I always went to him for advice. Sitting there with my dad in the hospital, I started to think about all of the patients in my dialysis facility—how they feel, all they go through as dialysis patients, and all of the tough decisions they have to make.</p><p>As I had in the past, I took this time talked to my dad about the opportunity, even though I wasn't sure he couldn't hear me as he lay there in the hospital bed. I told him about the offer and, even though he could not talk because of his ventilator, he raised his arm, put his hand on mine, and shook his head “no.” I said, “Dad, do you want me to stay with the patients?” And he nodded his head “yes.”.</p><p>This was a very moving moment for me, and I immediately decided to decline my company's offer and stay with patient care. When you set up patients every day, it's easy to become mechanical and just go through the motions. But I now look at every patient as if he or she is my dad, and am careful to string a machine and hook up every patient with the same care and precision as if my dad was in that chair.</p><p>My father passed away three years ago. I loved him very much, and I miss him terribly, but he helped me make a decision I've never been sorry for. Thank you, Dad. You were my favorite patient. Love, your son, John.</p>","PeriodicalId":51012,"journal":{"name":"Dialysis & Transplantation","volume":"40 3","pages":"136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dat.20549","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"51498464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Excellent outcomes of renal transplantation in patients 70 years of age or older 70岁或以上患者肾移植的良好结果
Pub Date : 2011-03-08 DOI: 10.1002/dat.20545
James V. Guarrera MD, Benjamin Samstein MD, Fahad Aziz MD, Joan Kelly RN, Mark A. Hardy MD, Lloyd E. Ratner MD

BACKGROUND

The survival benefit of renal transplantation is well established. As the average life expectancy increases, so too will the average age of renal transplant patients.

METHODS

We reviewed our experience with renal transplantation in patients 70 years of age and older. Fifty patients aged 70 years and older were transplanted at our institution between 1997 and 2007. Demographics and outcomes were recorded retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean age of the cohort was 73.1 years (range, 70–80 years). Among the 50 transplanted allografts, 32 (64%) were from deceased donors, and 18 (36%) were from living donors. At last follow-up, 45 (90%) patients were alive and 43 (86%) grafts were functioning. Median survival was 6.42 years. Five patients (10%) died, three from sepsis, one from cytomegalovirus infection, and one from myocardial infarction and stroke. There was no difference in the frequency of diabetes or hypertension compared with younger recipients in our institution during the same time period. Mean serum creatinine levels at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years of fol-low-up were, respectively, 1.8 ± 0.97 (n = 41), 1.8 ± 1.3 (n = 33), 1.5 ± 0.4 (n = 25), 1.6 ± 0.45 (n = 16), and 1.5 ± 0.37 (n = 6) mg/dL. There were no statistically significant differences in acute cellular rejection between dif-ferent induction regimens. There were two grafts lost to rejection and fewer infections in the interleukin-2 receptor blocker group compared with the thymoglobulin group (p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Renal transplantation in patients 70 years of age and older is associated with excellent patient and graft survival, similar to rates in younger recipients. Advanced age should not be a contraindication to renal transplantation.

背景:肾移植对生存的益处是公认的。随着平均寿命的增加,肾移植患者的平均年龄也会增加。方法我们回顾了70岁及以上患者肾移植的经验。1997年至2007年间,50例年龄在70岁及以上的患者在我院接受了肾移植。回顾性记录人口统计学和结果。结果队列患者平均年龄为73.1岁(70-80岁)。50例同种异体移植中,32例(64%)来自死亡供体,18例(36%)来自活体供体。最后随访,45例(90%)患者存活,43例(86%)移植物功能正常。中位生存期为6.42年。5例(10%)患者死亡,3例死于败血症,1例死于巨细胞病毒感染,1例死于心肌梗死和中风。在同一时期,与我们机构的年轻接受者相比,糖尿病或高血压的频率没有差异。随访3个月、6个月、1年、2年和3年的平均血清肌酐水平分别为1.8±0.97 (n = 41)、1.8±1.3 (n = 33)、1.5±0.4 (n = 25)、1.6±0.45 (n = 16)和1.5±0.37 (n = 6) mg/dL。不同诱导方案间急性细胞排斥反应差异无统计学意义。与胸腺球蛋白组相比,白细胞介素-2受体阻滞剂组有2例移植物因排斥而丢失,感染较少(p = NS)。结论:70岁及以上患者的肾移植与良好的患者和移植物存活率相关,与年轻受者相似。高龄不应成为肾移植的禁忌症。
{"title":"Excellent outcomes of renal transplantation in patients 70 years of age or older","authors":"James V. Guarrera MD,&nbsp;Benjamin Samstein MD,&nbsp;Fahad Aziz MD,&nbsp;Joan Kelly RN,&nbsp;Mark A. Hardy MD,&nbsp;Lloyd E. Ratner MD","doi":"10.1002/dat.20545","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dat.20545","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> BACKGROUND</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The survival benefit of renal transplantation is well established. As the average life expectancy increases, so too will the average age of renal transplant patients.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> METHODS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We reviewed our experience with renal transplantation in patients 70 years of age and older. Fifty patients aged 70 years and older were transplanted at our institution between 1997 and 2007. Demographics and outcomes were recorded retrospectively.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> RESULTS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The mean age of the cohort was 73.1 years (range, 70–80 years). Among the 50 transplanted allografts, 32 (64%) were from deceased donors, and 18 (36%) were from living donors. At last follow-up, 45 (90%) patients were alive and 43 (86%) grafts were functioning. Median survival was 6.42 years. Five patients (10%) died, three from sepsis, one from cytomegalovirus infection, and one from myocardial infarction and stroke. There was no difference in the frequency of diabetes or hypertension compared with younger recipients in our institution during the same time period. Mean serum creatinine levels at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years of fol-low-up were, respectively, 1.8 ± 0.97 (<i>n</i> = 41), 1.8 ± 1.3 (<i>n</i> = 33), 1.5 ± 0.4 (<i>n</i> = 25), 1.6 ± 0.45 (<i>n</i> = 16), and 1.5 ± 0.37 (<i>n</i> = 6) mg/dL. There were no statistically significant differences in acute cellular rejection between dif-ferent induction regimens. There were two grafts lost to rejection and fewer infections in the interleukin-2 receptor blocker group compared with the thymoglobulin group (<i>p</i> = NS).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> CONCLUSIONS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Renal transplantation in patients 70 years of age and older is associated with excellent patient and graft survival, similar to rates in younger recipients. Advanced age should not be a contraindication to renal transplantation.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51012,"journal":{"name":"Dialysis & Transplantation","volume":"40 3","pages":"124-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dat.20545","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"51498753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Research 101: Terms to help you understand research results 研究101:帮助你理解研究结果的术语
Pub Date : 2011-03-08 DOI: 10.1002/dat.20550
Dori Schatell MS, Peter Laird MD

Dialysis is a fast-moving field and new, important studies come out each month. When you understand some of these common research terms, you'll be better equipped to know what the results may mean for your patients.

透析是一个快速发展的领域,每个月都有新的重要研究出来。当你了解了这些常见的研究术语,你就能更好地了解这些结果对你的病人意味着什么。
{"title":"Research 101: Terms to help you understand research results","authors":"Dori Schatell MS,&nbsp;Peter Laird MD","doi":"10.1002/dat.20550","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dat.20550","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dialysis is a fast-moving field and new, important studies come out each month. When you understand some of these common research terms, you'll be better equipped to know what the results may mean for your patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51012,"journal":{"name":"Dialysis & Transplantation","volume":"40 3","pages":"133-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dat.20550","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"51498570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deceased-donor kidney transplant following ethylene glycol-induced brain death 乙二醇致脑死亡后的肾移植
Pub Date : 2011-03-08 DOI: 10.1002/dat.20537
Nicole Sifontis PharmD, Richard Kim MD, Mark Birkenbach MD, Iris Lee MD, Serban Constantinescu MD, Andreas Karachristos MD, Patricio Silva MD, John Daller MD

We report on a deceased-donor kidney transplant following ethylene glycol-induced brain death. The donor was a 53-year-old man with a history of depression who presented to the emergency department after drinking a “cocktail amount” of windshield wiper fluid each day for the past 3 weeks. Upon presentation he became unresponsive and suffered a seizure. Fomepizole 1.2 g IV followed by emergent hemodialysis was initiated as indicated for acute treat-ment of ethylene glycol poisoning. Unfortunately, the patient never regained consciousness and progressed to brain death. At the time of procurement his urine output was over 250 mL/h, and serum creatinine was 2.2 mg/dL. Renal biopsy following procurement revealed minimal tubule injury without evidence of intratubular oxalate crystals. The kidney recipient was a 76-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease secondary to diabetes and hypertension. Cold ischemia time was 31 hours, 45 minutes. The only postoperative complication was delayed graft function and one episode of mild acute cellular rejection 7 weeks post transplant that resolved with IV methylprednisolone. Two years post transplant the patient continues to do well clinically with a baseline serum creatinine of 2.5 mg/dL.

我们报告一例因乙二醇致脑死亡而死亡的供体肾移植病例。供体是一名53岁的男性,有抑郁症病史,在过去3周内每天饮用“鸡尾酒量”的雨刷液后到急诊室就诊。在介绍后,他变得没有反应并癫痫发作。作为乙二醇中毒急性治疗的适应症,开始使用福美唑1.2 g静脉滴注,随后进行紧急血液透析。不幸的是,病人再也没有恢复意识,进展为脑死亡。在采购时,他的尿量超过250 mL/h,血清肌酐为2.2 mg/dL。肾穿刺后的肾活检显示小管损伤很小,没有小管内草酸盐结晶的证据。肾脏受体是一名76岁的妇女,患有继发于糖尿病和高血压的终末期肾脏疾病。冷缺血时间31小时45分钟。唯一的术后并发症是移植物功能延迟和移植后7周发生一次轻度急性细胞排斥反应,经静脉注射甲基强的松龙解决。移植后两年,患者的临床表现继续良好,基线血清肌酐为2.5 mg/dL。
{"title":"Deceased-donor kidney transplant following ethylene glycol-induced brain death","authors":"Nicole Sifontis PharmD,&nbsp;Richard Kim MD,&nbsp;Mark Birkenbach MD,&nbsp;Iris Lee MD,&nbsp;Serban Constantinescu MD,&nbsp;Andreas Karachristos MD,&nbsp;Patricio Silva MD,&nbsp;John Daller MD","doi":"10.1002/dat.20537","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dat.20537","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We report on a deceased-donor kidney transplant following ethylene glycol-induced brain death. The donor was a 53-year-old man with a history of depression who presented to the emergency department after drinking a “cocktail amount” of windshield wiper fluid each day for the past 3 weeks. Upon presentation he became unresponsive and suffered a seizure. Fomepizole 1.2 g IV followed by emergent hemodialysis was initiated as indicated for acute treat-ment of ethylene glycol poisoning. Unfortunately, the patient never regained consciousness and progressed to brain death. At the time of procurement his urine output was over 250 mL/h, and serum creatinine was 2.2 mg/dL. Renal biopsy following procurement revealed minimal tubule injury without evidence of intratubular oxalate crystals. The kidney recipient was a 76-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease secondary to diabetes and hypertension. Cold ischemia time was 31 hours, 45 minutes. The only postoperative complication was delayed graft function and one episode of mild acute cellular rejection 7 weeks post transplant that resolved with IV methylprednisolone. Two years post transplant the patient continues to do well clinically with a baseline serum creatinine of 2.5 mg/dL.</p>","PeriodicalId":51012,"journal":{"name":"Dialysis & Transplantation","volume":"40 3","pages":"126-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dat.20537","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"51498310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Amino acid removal in high-flow and conventional continuous hemodiafiltration 高流量和常规连续血液滤过中的氨基酸去除
Pub Date : 2011-03-08 DOI: 10.1002/dat.20546
Kazushige Oishi MD, Satoshi Hagiwara MD, PhD, Satoko Koga MD, Satoshi Kawabe MD, Takahiro Uno MD, PhD, Koji Goto MD, PhD, Takayuki Noguchi MD, PhD

OBJECTIVE

Continuous hemodiafiltration is frequently used in intensive care as renal replacement therapy for acute kidney damage. Recent studies have shown that increased flow rates can effectively increase survival. However, continuous hemodiafiltration also removes essential small molecules such as amino acids.

METHODS

We compared amino acid loss between conventional (normal-flow) and high-flow continuous hemodia-filtration in 17 patients admitted to the intensive care unit for conditions such as sepsis. Patients were randomly divided into a normal-flow group (dialysate flow, 500 mL/min; filtrate flow, 300 mL/min; and blood flow, 80 mL/min) and a high-flow group (dialysate flow, 1,500 mL/min; filtrate flow, 900 mL/min; blood flow, 100 mL/min). Blood samples were collected immediately prior to continuous hemodiafi initiation, and at 2 and 6 hours after con-tinuous hemodiafiltration initiation. In addition, blood and filtrate were collected from the circuit in front of and behind the continuous hemodiafiltration dialyzer.

RESULTS

We found that amino acid removal was significantly higher in the high-flow group and that amino acids were removed into the filtrates in proportion to their plasma concentrations. Furthermore, plasma amino acid con-centrations also tended to decrease with the length of time continuous hemodiafiltration was performed. Given that large amounts of amino acid are removed during continuous hemodiafiltration, plasma amino acid levels should be monitored when prolonged continuous hemodiafiltration is performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Amino acid loss is particularly high during high-flow continuous hemodiafiltration, suggesting that it may be necessary to shorten the duration of high-flow continuous hemodiafiltration or supplement patients with sufficient amounts of amino acids.

目的持续血液滤过术是重症监护急性肾损害患者常用的肾脏替代疗法。最近的研究表明,增加流量可以有效地提高生存率。然而,持续血液滤过也会去除必需的小分子,如氨基酸。方法:我们比较了17例因脓毒症等疾病入住重症监护病房的患者在常规(正常流量)和高流量连续血液滤过之间的氨基酸损失。患者随机分为正常流量组(透析液流量500 mL/min;滤液流量:300 mL/min;大流量组(透析液流量1500 mL/min;滤液流量900 mL/min;血流量100 mL/min)。在连续血液滤过开始前立即采集血样,在连续血液滤过开始后2和6小时采集血样。此外,在连续血液滤过透析器前后回路采集血液和滤液。结果:高流量组氨基酸去除率显著提高,氨基酸去除率与血浆浓度成正比。此外,血浆氨基酸浓度也随持续血液滤过时间的延长而降低。鉴于在连续血液滤过过程中大量氨基酸被去除,当进行长时间连续血液滤过时,应监测血浆氨基酸水平。结论高流量连续血液滤过过程中氨基酸损失特别高,提示有必要缩短高流量连续血液滤过时间或补充足量氨基酸。
{"title":"Amino acid removal in high-flow and conventional continuous hemodiafiltration","authors":"Kazushige Oishi MD,&nbsp;Satoshi Hagiwara MD, PhD,&nbsp;Satoko Koga MD,&nbsp;Satoshi Kawabe MD,&nbsp;Takahiro Uno MD, PhD,&nbsp;Koji Goto MD, PhD,&nbsp;Takayuki Noguchi MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/dat.20546","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dat.20546","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> OBJECTIVE</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Continuous hemodiafiltration is frequently used in intensive care as renal replacement therapy for acute kidney damage. Recent studies have shown that increased flow rates can effectively increase survival. However, continuous hemodiafiltration also removes essential small molecules such as amino acids.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> METHODS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We compared amino acid loss between conventional (normal-flow) and high-flow continuous hemodia-filtration in 17 patients admitted to the intensive care unit for conditions such as sepsis. Patients were randomly divided into a normal-flow group (dialysate flow, 500 mL/min; filtrate flow, 300 mL/min; and blood flow, 80 mL/min) and a high-flow group (dialysate flow, 1,500 mL/min; filtrate flow, 900 mL/min; blood flow, 100 mL/min). Blood samples were collected immediately prior to continuous hemodiafi initiation, and at 2 and 6 hours after con-tinuous hemodiafiltration initiation. In addition, blood and filtrate were collected from the circuit in front of and behind the continuous hemodiafiltration dialyzer.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> RESULTS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We found that amino acid removal was significantly higher in the high-flow group and that amino acids were removed into the filtrates in proportion to their plasma concentrations. Furthermore, plasma amino acid con-centrations also tended to decrease with the length of time continuous hemodiafiltration was performed. Given that large amounts of amino acid are removed during continuous hemodiafiltration, plasma amino acid levels should be monitored when prolonged continuous hemodiafiltration is performed.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> CONCLUSIONS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Amino acid loss is particularly high during high-flow continuous hemodiafiltration, suggesting that it may be necessary to shorten the duration of high-flow continuous hemodiafiltration or supplement patients with sufficient amounts of amino acids.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51012,"journal":{"name":"Dialysis & Transplantation","volume":"40 3","pages":"110-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dat.20546","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"51498384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The D&T Report D&T报告
Pub Date : 2011-03-08 DOI: 10.1002/dat.20551

As the worldwide burden of renal disease increases, it appears that the public's willingness to donate their organs is also growing: According to a 2009 survey by L.D. Horvat, MD and colleagues in the Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes Re-search (DONOR) Network, rates of living donor kidney transplantation have steadily risen in most regions of the world, increasing its global significance as a treatment option for kidney failure. In 2006, the latest year for which numbers are available, 27,000 live-donor transplants were performed around the world. As shown in Table I, Americans donated the greatest number of kidneys in absolute terms, but Saudi Arabians were most altruistic on a perpopulation basis.1

However, the supply of available kidneys from both live and deceased donors still falls greatly short of demand. In 2006, there were roughly 70,000 people on the wait list for organ donors in the United States alone, according to the U.S Renal Data Service. Similar scenarios exist in other countries. Currently, more than 50% of transplanted kidneys in the U.S. are from deceased donors and approximately 90% of these recipients would have undergone dialysis for three to five years prior to receiving that deceased- donor organ. 2

Many of the attempts to increase organ availability focus on broadening the donor pool. In trends such as expanded-criteria donors (ECD) and donation after cardiac death (DCD), kidneys are taken from people who are older and whose health may not be as good as standard-criteria donors (SCD), but whose organsmight still be viable for patients who are themselves older or sicker than average. The blessings associated with ECD kidneys are mixed: Patients who receive those organs live longer than people who remain on dialysis, but not as long as patients transplanted with SCD kidneys. In fact, compared with dialysis, the projected average number of added life-years associated with an SCD kidney is 10 years, but only 5.1 years for an ECD organ. The differences become especially stark with the passage of time: at 5 years post-transplant, average patient survival is 82% with SCD organs and only 70% with ECD organs, and graft survival is 65% and 49%, respectively. No such differences exist in comparisons between donation after brain death (DBD) and DCDkidneys. 2

Since 1996, some surgeons have transplanted both kidneys from donors who are particularly marginal. Dualkidney transplants (DKTs) now account for about 2% of all renal transplants performed in the U.S., or about 320 transplants per year. The criteria for a DKT donor is relatively loose, as long as the donor does not have cancer orAIDS. For example, in a DKT procedure performed at the University of Kansas Hospital in Kansas City last November, the donor was 75 at the time of death and had a history of hypertension and stroke. In this case, the recipient was 88 years old and also hypertensive. Such a patient would p

近年来,人们对患者的标准也进行了更仔细的研究。正如医学博士塞拉斯·诺曼(Silas Norman)在2009年的一篇《美国医学杂志》(D&T)的论文中指出的那样,自1997年以来,等待就诊的患者的平均年龄有所增加,其中50岁及以上患者的增长尤为明显。结果,“接受同种异体器官移植的患者死亡率显著增加,同时移植后的存活率也在下降。”目前的分配方法没有跟上这一现实,因此,到2007年,该系统“不公平,缺乏可预测性,并且没有有效利用捐赠肾脏的潜在寿命年”。目前的系统也被证明不再符合1984年国家器官移植法案(NOTA)或器官获取和移植网络(OPTN)最终规则的部分内容,这两个指导美国器官分配的指令。为了跟上不断变化的患者情况,OPTN肾脏移植委员会提出了肾脏分配评分(KAS)来取代旧的分配系统。与目前的系统一样,KAS将支持一定水平的面板反应性抗体(PRA)。然而,目前的系统主要允许SCD或ECD器官,KAS将使用计算的供体特征指数(DPI)来确定同种异体移植的存活时间。KAS也会从维持性透析开始计算等待时间,而不是像目前那样,当患者处于积极的等待名单时。KAS最具争议的方面是改变了目前主要的医学考虑,即HLA匹配。有了KAS,这将被移植后寿命年(LYFT)的计算所取代:移植了特定已故捐赠者的肾脏的患者预期寿命与未移植的患者预期寿命之差。LYFT将从一个复杂的方程中推导出来,其中包括供体和受体因素,以及对生活质量的调整。LYFT受到了医生和患者权益组织的批评,因为它似乎建议将病情较重的老年患者与病情较重的老年捐赠者配对,这让人担心这些患者会得到质量较差的肾脏。然而,医学博士拉里·梅尔顿(Larry Melton)指出,一些年轻患者有太多的合共病,他们的预期寿命可能与相对健康的老年人相同或更短。美国卫生与公众服务部民权办公室的官员正在审查KAS,以确定它是否违反了反对年龄歧视的法律。与此同时,人们仍在继续寻找一种合乎道德、公平的方式来扩大器官供应。接受肾移植的患者在接受数月或数年的透析后,可以享受移植所提供的独立性和(近乎)正常生活的回归。毫不奇怪,移植失败会造成巨大的心理和临床损失。“这对病人来说可能是毁灭性的,因为他们最初会经历类似的否认和愤怒的步骤,就像一个人被告知所爱的人去世一样,”医学博士、俄亥俄州克利夫兰凯斯西储大学肾病学和高血压学助理教授肯尼斯·博兹亚克说。一般来说,与继续透析或移植物存活的患者相比,移植物丢失(DAGL)后再次透析的患者生存率和生活质量降低。大多数DAGL患者在移植前已经进行了较长时间的透析,因此他们长期暴露于尿毒症及其相关并发症中。移植失败后,再加上器官排斥反应的炎症后果。这些患者的感染相关败血症发生率很高,他们通常需要导管进行静脉通路。所有这一切都是在回归透析所带来的情感损失之外的。戴安娜·黑德利-贝尔对这个过程有所了解。1981年,她接受了已故捐赠者的移植手术,并享受了18年的肾脏。1999年,她感染了肺炎,她需要的强效抗生素导致移植失败。不情愿地,她回到中心透析。移植失败时,她的丈夫也生病了,她几乎是独自抚养13岁的儿子;她的日常生活已经很有压力了,由于重新透析,她的生活方式和健康状况发生了变化,这让她几乎无法忍受。这也许并不奇怪,死亡率急剧上升的病人群体在恢复透析的第一年。腹膜透析(PD)的吸引力之一是它为患者提供了与肾移植相同的独立性和自由度。然而,直到最近,由于担心腹膜炎等不良副作用,临床医生一直不愿向dagl患者提供这种选择。
{"title":"The D&T Report","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/dat.20551","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dat.20551","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As the worldwide burden of renal disease increases, it appears that the public's willingness to donate their organs is also growing: According to a 2009 survey by L.D. Horvat, MD and colleagues in the Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes Re-search (DONOR) Network, rates of living donor kidney transplantation have steadily risen in most regions of the world, increasing its global significance as a treatment option for kidney failure. In 2006, the latest year for which numbers are available, 27,000 live-donor transplants were performed around the world. As shown in Table I, Americans donated the greatest number of kidneys in absolute terms, but Saudi Arabians were most altruistic on a perpopulation basis.<span>1</span>\u0000 </p><p>However, the supply of available kidneys from both live and deceased donors still falls greatly short of demand. In 2006, there were roughly 70,000 people on the wait list for organ donors in the United States alone, according to the U.S Renal Data Service. Similar scenarios exist in other countries. Currently, more than 50% of transplanted kidneys in the U.S. are from deceased donors and approximately 90% of these recipients would have undergone dialysis for three to five years prior to receiving that deceased- donor organ. <span>2</span></p><p>Many of the attempts to increase organ availability focus on broadening the donor pool. In trends such as expanded-criteria donors (ECD) and donation after cardiac death (DCD), kidneys are taken from people who are older and whose health may not be as good as standard-criteria donors (SCD), but whose organsmight still be viable for patients who are themselves older or sicker than average. The blessings associated with ECD kidneys are mixed: Patients who receive those organs live longer than people who remain on dialysis, but not as long as patients transplanted with SCD kidneys. In fact, compared with dialysis, the projected average number of added life-years associated with an SCD kidney is 10 years, but only 5.1 years for an ECD organ. The differences become especially stark with the passage of time: at 5 years post-transplant, average patient survival is 82% with SCD organs and only 70% with ECD organs, and graft survival is 65% and 49%, respectively. No such differences exist in comparisons between donation after brain death (DBD) and DCDkidneys. <span>2</span></p><p>Since 1996, some surgeons have transplanted both kidneys from donors who are particularly marginal. Dualkidney transplants (DKTs) now account for about 2% of all renal transplants performed in the U.S., or about 320 transplants per year. The criteria for a DKT donor is relatively loose, as long as the donor does not have cancer orAIDS. For example, in a DKT procedure performed at the University of Kansas Hospital in Kansas City last November, the donor was 75 at the time of death and had a history of hypertension and stroke. In this case, the recipient was 88 years old and also hypertensive. Such a patient would p","PeriodicalId":51012,"journal":{"name":"Dialysis & Transplantation","volume":"40 3","pages":"96-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dat.20551","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"137807225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Post-renal transplant plasma cell dyscrasia presenting as retroperitoneal plasmacytoma: A case report and literature review 肾移植后浆细胞增生表现为腹膜后浆细胞瘤:1例报告及文献复习
Pub Date : 2011-03-08 DOI: 10.1002/dat.20539
Mahvish Muzaffar MD, Rekha Chaudhary MD, Xin Li MD, Shobha Ratnam MD

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a rare but potentially fatal complication of organ transplanta-tion. Most cases of PTLD represent Epstein Barr virus (EBV)-related B-cell disease in a setting of pharmacological immunosuppression. Post-transplant plasma cell dyscrasia is very rare, and post-transplant plasma cell dyscrasia with extramedullary plasmacytoma is extremely rare. We report here a case of the latter, which to our knowledge is the fourth such reported case in the English literature. A 22-year-old man developed post-transplant plasma cell dyscrasia 20 years after a renal transplant while on immunosuppression. His presentation included retroperitoneal plasmacytoma, which is very rare and is probably the first case in a renal transplant patient. The patient is in complete remission 1 year after receiving five cycles of bortezomib and dexamethasone.

移植后淋巴细胞增生性疾病(PTLD)是一种罕见但可能致命的器官移植并发症。大多数PTLD病例代表eb病毒(EBV)相关的b细胞疾病在药理学免疫抑制的设置。移植后浆细胞增生非常罕见,移植后浆细胞增生合并髓外浆细胞瘤更是极为罕见。我们在这里报告了后者的一个病例,据我们所知,这是在英语文献中报告的第四个这样的病例。一名22岁的男性在接受免疫抑制治疗20年后发生肾移植后浆细胞病变。他的报告包括腹膜后浆细胞瘤,这是非常罕见的,可能是第一例肾移植患者。患者在接受5个疗程的硼替佐米和地塞米松治疗后1年完全缓解。
{"title":"Post-renal transplant plasma cell dyscrasia presenting as retroperitoneal plasmacytoma: A case report and literature review","authors":"Mahvish Muzaffar MD,&nbsp;Rekha Chaudhary MD,&nbsp;Xin Li MD,&nbsp;Shobha Ratnam MD","doi":"10.1002/dat.20539","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dat.20539","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a rare but potentially fatal complication of organ transplanta-tion. Most cases of PTLD represent Epstein Barr virus (EBV)-related B-cell disease in a setting of pharmacological immunosuppression. Post-transplant plasma cell dyscrasia is very rare, and post-transplant plasma cell dyscrasia with extramedullary plasmacytoma is extremely rare. We report here a case of the latter, which to our knowledge is the fourth such reported case in the English literature. A 22-year-old man developed post-transplant plasma cell dyscrasia 20 years after a renal transplant while on immunosuppression. His presentation included retroperitoneal plasmacytoma, which is very rare and is probably the first case in a renal transplant patient. The patient is in complete remission 1 year after receiving five cycles of bortezomib and dexamethasone.</p>","PeriodicalId":51012,"journal":{"name":"Dialysis & Transplantation","volume":"40 3","pages":"130-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dat.20539","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"51497953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
BK virus infection after renal transplantation 肾移植术后BK病毒感染
Pub Date : 2011-03-08 DOI: 10.1002/dat.20544
Puneet Sood MD, Sundaram Hariharan MD

In this review, we will discuss updates in diagnosis, treatment, and primary prevention, as well as unresolved issues and future directions for BK virus nephropathy in renal transplant patients.

在这篇综述中,我们将讨论肾移植患者BK病毒肾病的诊断、治疗和一级预防的最新进展,以及尚未解决的问题和未来的方向。
{"title":"BK virus infection after renal transplantation","authors":"Puneet Sood MD,&nbsp;Sundaram Hariharan MD","doi":"10.1002/dat.20544","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dat.20544","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this review, we will discuss updates in diagnosis, treatment, and primary prevention, as well as unresolved issues and future directions for BK virus nephropathy in renal transplant patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51012,"journal":{"name":"Dialysis & Transplantation","volume":"40 3","pages":"102-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dat.20544","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"137807226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Analysis of some risk factors of coronary and valvular calcification in peritoneal dialysis 腹膜透析中冠状动脉和瓣膜钙化的危险因素分析
Pub Date : 2011-03-08 DOI: 10.1002/dat.20547
Lucyna Janicka MD, PhD, Dariusz Duma MD, PhD, Agnieszka M. Grzebalska MD, PhD, Elzbieta Czekajska-Chehab MD, PhD, Andrzej Drop MD, PhD, Grzegorz Staskiewicz MD, PhD, Krzysztof Janicki MD, PhD, Janusz Solski MD, PhD, Andrzej Książek MD, PhD

OBJECTIVE

Our study was performed to analyze risk factors for coronary artery calcification (CAC) and valvular calcification (VC) in peritoneally dialyzed patients, as well as the frequency of fatal cardiovascular complications.

METHODS

The study was performed on 102 peritoneal dialyzed patients (mean time of dialysis: 37.3 ± 23 months). Patients were divided depending on the severity of calcification into three groups: A, lack of calcification; B, CAC up to 400 mm3; and C, CAC >400 mm3. CAC and VC were measured by means of computed tomography. The following risk factors for CAC and VC were analyzed: age, gender, time of peritoneal dialysis, and levels of calcium, phosphates, calcium × phosphorus product (Ca × P), C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, fetuin-A, and parathormone (PTH).

RESULTS

Positive correlation was found between CAC and VC expressed by Agatston and volumetric score, and serum levels of CRP and fibrinogen and patient age. In patients with CAC and VC, serum levels of phosphorus and Ca × P were significantly higher; however, such significance was not observed in patients with CAC only. Serum fetuin-A was decreased in all study groups, and was significantly lower in patients with CAC and VC than in patients with CAC only. Cardiovascular complications were significantly more frequent and mortality was higher in group C than in groups A and B.

CONCLUSIONS

In peritoneally dialyzed patients, CAC accompanied by VC is a high risk factor for mortality resulting from cardiovascular complications.

目的分析腹膜透析患者冠状动脉钙化(CAC)和瓣膜钙化(VC)的危险因素及致死性心血管并发症的发生频率。方法对102例腹膜透析患者(平均透析时间:37.3±23个月)进行研究。根据钙化的严重程度将患者分为三组:A组,缺乏钙化;B、CAC可达400mm3;C, CAC >400 mm3。通过计算机断层扫描测量CAC和VC。分析CAC和VC的危险因素:年龄、性别、腹膜透析时间、钙、磷酸盐、钙×磷产物(Ca × P)、c反应蛋白(CRP)、纤维蛋白原、胎儿素a、甲状旁腺激素(PTH)水平。结果CAC、VC的Agatston表达与容积评分呈正相关,血清CRP、纤维蛋白原水平与患者年龄呈正相关。CAC和VC患者血清磷、钙×磷水平显著升高;然而,仅在CAC患者中没有观察到这种意义。在所有研究组中,血清胎蛋白a均降低,且合并CAC和VC的患者血清胎蛋白a明显低于仅合并CAC的患者。C组心血管并发症发生率明显高于A、b组,死亡率明显高于A、b组。结论腹膜透析患者CAC合并VC是心血管并发症死亡的高危因素。
{"title":"Analysis of some risk factors of coronary and valvular calcification in peritoneal dialysis","authors":"Lucyna Janicka MD, PhD,&nbsp;Dariusz Duma MD, PhD,&nbsp;Agnieszka M. Grzebalska MD, PhD,&nbsp;Elzbieta Czekajska-Chehab MD, PhD,&nbsp;Andrzej Drop MD, PhD,&nbsp;Grzegorz Staskiewicz MD, PhD,&nbsp;Krzysztof Janicki MD, PhD,&nbsp;Janusz Solski MD, PhD,&nbsp;Andrzej Książek MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/dat.20547","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dat.20547","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> OBJECTIVE</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our study was performed to analyze risk factors for coronary artery calcification (CAC) and valvular calcification (VC) in peritoneally dialyzed patients, as well as the frequency of fatal cardiovascular complications.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> METHODS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The study was performed on 102 peritoneal dialyzed patients (mean time of dialysis: 37.3 ± 23 months). Patients were divided depending on the severity of calcification into three groups: A, lack of calcification; B, CAC up to 400 mm<sup>3</sup>; and C, CAC &gt;400 mm<sup>3</sup>. CAC and VC were measured by means of computed tomography. The following risk factors for CAC and VC were analyzed: age, gender, time of peritoneal dialysis, and levels of calcium, phosphates, calcium × phosphorus product (Ca × P), C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, fetuin-A, and parathormone (PTH).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> RESULTS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Positive correlation was found between CAC and VC expressed by Agatston and volumetric score, and serum levels of CRP and fibrinogen and patient age. In patients with CAC and VC, serum levels of phosphorus and Ca × P were significantly higher; however, such significance was not observed in patients with CAC only. Serum fetuin-A was decreased in all study groups, and was significantly lower in patients with CAC and VC than in patients with CAC only. Cardiovascular complications were significantly more frequent and mortality was higher in group C than in groups A and B.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> CONCLUSIONS</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In peritoneally dialyzed patients, CAC accompanied by VC is a high risk factor for mortality resulting from cardiovascular complications.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51012,"journal":{"name":"Dialysis & Transplantation","volume":"40 3","pages":"118-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/dat.20547","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"51498430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Dialysis & Transplantation
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1