Aim: Sudden cardiac death occurs mainly outside of the hospital, placing witnesses in a pivotal role to intervene and enhance the survival. We aim to investigate its potential psychological repercussions on both the patient and the witness.
Outcomes: Incidence of acute stress disorder and/or post-traumatic stress disorder among patients and their relatives at 3 and 6 months following sudden cardiac death.
Methods: All patients admitted for resuscitated sudden cardiac death at our institution between 2019 to 2021 were screened. Within 15 days following resuscitated sudden cardiac death, both the patients and one of their relatives underwent face-to-face interviews with dedicated questionnaires. At 3-6 months post-event, participants were contacted by phone to complete the questionnaires.
Results: Twenty-two patients (6 females, 51±11yo) and 23 relatives (13 females, 49±15yo) were included. The reason for sudden cardiac death was ischemic (n=9/22) or dilated cardiomyopathies (n=5/22), idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (n=4/22) or others (4/22). Relatives exhibited a higher magnitude of acute stress compared to patients (26±25 vs 48±20, P<0.001). Five persons were lost to follow-up (2 patients and 3 relatives). Nevertheless, 4/20 (20%) patients and 3/20 (15%) relatives were diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder.
Conclusions: Post-traumatic stress disorder in patients/relatives is frequent after resuscitated sudden cardiac death (20 to 15%). It is crucial to maintain close vigilance since patients remain susceptible to the future onset of post-traumatic stress disorder, even when they manifest milder symptoms of acute stress. Offering early interventions for relatives may serve as a preventive measure.
Introduction: Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) affects 1 to 3% of the general population and up to 20% of psychiatric inpatients. It is characterized by emotional dysregulation, impaired interpersonal relationships, and impulsive behaviors. This systematic review aims to identify psychopathological mechanisms, comorbidities, and gender differences associated with violence in BPD.
Methods: This review followed PRISMA guidelines and included studies published in English or French with no time restriction. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed and Ovid using the search equation: ((violence [MeSH Terms]) or (aggression [MeSH Terms])) and (borderline personality disorder [MeSH Terms]) and (psychiatry). Of 502 initial publications, 28 were included in the final analysis.
Results: Aggressiveness in BPD was found to be associated with emotional dysregulation and impulsivity, influencing violent behaviors (β=0.25 to 0.52). Comorbidities such as bipolar disorder, substance use, or co-occurring personality disorders exacerbated aggression (OR=2.1 to 3.2). Suicidal and self-harming behaviors affected 78% of adolescents and 73% of adults with BPD. Women accounted for 75% of BPD diagnoses and presented more self-directed aggression (suicide, self-harm), whereas men more frequently exhibited outwardly directed aggression. Finally, childhood trauma and dysfunctional family environments were seen as major predictors of aggressive and suicidal behaviors in adulthood (OR=3.9 to 5.8).
Conclusion: Findings highlighted the central role of emotional dysregulation, impulsivity, and early trauma in BPD-related aggression. Clinical implications include the need for targeted therapies (e.g., DBT, MBT), early screening for trauma, and gender-sensitive approaches. This review underscores the interaction between biological, psychological, and social factors in BPD-associated violence and calls for personalized interventions and the integration of longitudinal research designs.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between psychoeducation for relatives (PER) following a first-episode psychosis (FEP), as well as the impact of this PER on the mental health of these relatives.
Methods: We conducted an observational study of patients who experienced a FEP and underwent psychoeducation (PE) about it (FEP - PE). We divided the sample into two groups according to the achievement of PER. The assessment of post-FEP outcome was based on subsequent diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, or major depressive episode, as well as subsequent hospitalization in a mental health unit. Mental health of relatives was assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y (STAI-Y1 and 2), and the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS).
Results: We enrolled 51 patients, 28 of whom had at least one relative who had benefited from PER. We found no significant association between PER and outcome after FEP. We found a positive and significant effect of PER on relatives' anxiety. The effect on depressive symptoms and well-being was positive but not significant.
Conclusions: This study found promising results regarding the psychological impact of PE for relatives of patients with an FEP but no significant impact on the evolution of the FEP. This work suggests the extension of PE to improve the mental health of relatives and further studies regarding the effect on the evolution of FEP.

